An aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase complex in Escherichia coli

The mARS complex: a critical mediator of immune regulation and homeostasis

Over the course of evolution, many proteins have undergone adaptive structural changes to meet the increasing homeostatic regulatory demands of multicellularity. Aminoacyl tRNA synthetases (aaRS), enzymes that catalyze the attachment of each amino acid to its cognate tRNA, are such proteins that have acquired new domains and motifs that enable non-canonical functions. Through these new domains and motifs, aaRS can assemble into large, multi-subunit complexes that enhance the efficiency of many biological functions. Moreover, because the complexity of multi-aminoacyl tRNA synthetase (mARS) complexes increases with the corresponding complexity of higher eukaryotes, a contribution to regulation of homeostatic functions in multicellular organisms is hypothesized. While mARS complexes in lower eukaryotes may enhance efficiency of aminoacylation, little evidence exists to support a similar role in chordates or other higher eukaryotes. Rather, mARS complexes are reported to regulate multiple and variegated cellular processes that include angiogenesis, apoptosis, inflammation, anaphylaxis, and metabolism. Because all such processes are critical components of immune homeostasis, it is important to understand the role of mARS complexes in immune regulation. Here we provide a conceptual analysis of the current understanding of mARS complex dynamics and emerging mARS complex roles in immune regulation, the increased understanding of which should reveal therapeutic targets in immunity and immune-mediated disease.

A proteome-wide map of chaperone-assisted protein refolding in a cytosol-like milieu

The journey by which proteins navigate their energy landscapes to their native structures is complex, involving (and sometimes requiring) many cellular factors and processes operating in partnership with a given polypeptide chain's intrinsic energy landscape. The cytosolic environment and its complement of chaperones play critical roles in granting many proteins safe passage to their native states; however, it is challenging to interrogate the folding process for large numbers of proteins in a complex background with most biophysical techniques. Hence, most chaperone-assisted protein refolding studies are conducted in defined buffers on single purified clients. Here, we develop a limited proteolysis-mass spectrometry approach paired with an isotope-labeling strategy to globally monitor the structures of refolding Escherichia coli proteins in the cytosolic medium and with the chaperones, GroEL/ES (Hsp60) and DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE (Hsp70/40). GroEL can refold the majority (85%) of the E. coli proteins for which we have data and is particularly important for restoring acidic proteins and proteins with high molecular weight, trends that come to light because our assay measures the structural outcome of the refolding process itself, rather than binding or aggregation. For the most part, DnaK and GroEL refold a similar set of proteins, supporting the view that despite their vastly different structures, these two chaperones unfold misfolded states, as one mechanism in common. Finally, we identify a cohort of proteins that are intransigent to being refolded with either chaperone. We suggest that these proteins may fold most efficiently cotranslationally, and then remain kinetically trapped in their native conformations.

Nonrefoldability is Pervasive Across the E. coli Proteome

Decades of research on protein folding have primarily focused on a subset of small proteins that can reversibly refold from a denatured state. However, these studies have generally not been representative of the complexity of natural proteomes, which consist of many proteins with complex architectures and domain organizations. Here, we introduce an experimental approach to probe protein refolding kinetics for whole proteomes using mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Our study covers the majority of the soluble E. coli proteome expressed during log-phase growth, and among this group, we find that one-third of the E. coli proteome is not intrinsically refoldable on physiological time scales, a cohort that is enriched with certain fold-types, domain organizations, and other biophysical features. We also identify several properties and fold-types that are correlated with slow refolding on the minute time scale. Hence, these results illuminate when exogenous factors and processes, such as chaperones or cotranslational folding, might be required for efficient protein folding.

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase complexes in evolution

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are essential enzymes for interpreting the genetic code. They are responsible for the proper pairing of codons on mRNA with amino acids. In addition to this canonical, translational function, they are also involved in the control of many cellular pathways essential for the maintenance of cellular homeostasis. Association of several of these enzymes within supramolecular assemblies is a key feature of organization of the translation apparatus in eukaryotes. It could be a means to control their oscillation between translational functions, when associated within a multi-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase complex (MARS), and nontranslational functions, after dissociation from the MARS and association with other partners. In this review, we summarize the composition of the different MARS described from archaea to mammals, the mode of assembly of these complexes, and their roles in maintenance of cellular homeostasis.

Exploring the evolutionary diversity and assembly modes of multi-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase complexes: lessons from unicellular organisms

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) are ubiquitous and ancient enzymes, mostly known for their essential role in generating aminoacylated tRNAs. During the last two decades, many aaRSs have been found to perform additional and equally crucial tasks outside translation. In metazoans, aaRSs have been shown to assemble, together with non-enzymatic assembly proteins called aaRSs-interacting multifunctional proteins (AIMPs), into so-called multi-synthetase complexes (MSCs). Metazoan MSCs are dynamic particles able to specifically release some of their constituents in response to a given stimulus. Upon their release from MSCs, aaRSs can reach other subcellular compartments, where they often participate to cellular processes that do not exploit their primary function of synthesizing aminoacyl-tRNAs. The dynamics of MSCs and the expansion of the aaRSs functional repertoire are features that are so far thought to be restricted to higher and multicellular eukaryotes. However, much can be learnt about how MSCs are assembled and function from apparently 'simple' organisms. Here we provide an overview on the diversity of these MSCs, their composition, mode of assembly and the functions that their constituents, namely aaRSs and AIMPs, exert in unicellular organisms.

Archaeal aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases interact with the ribosome to recycle tRNAs

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRS) are essential enzymes catalyzing the formation of aminoacyl-tRNAs, the immediate precursors for encoded peptides in ribosomal protein synthesis. Previous studies have suggested a link between tRNA aminoacylation and high-molecular-weight cellular complexes such as the cytoskeleton or ribosomes. However, the structural basis of these interactions and potential mechanistic implications are not well understood. To biochemically characterize these interactions we have used a system of two interacting archaeal aaRSs: an atypical methanogenic-type seryl-tRNA synthetase and an archaeal ArgRS. More specifically, we have shown by thermophoresis and surface plasmon resonance that these two aaRSs bind to the large ribosomal subunit with micromolar affinities. We have identified the L7/L12 stalk and the proteins located near the stalk base as the main sites for aaRS binding. Finally, we have performed a bioinformatics analysis of synonymous codons in the Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus genome that supports a mechanism in which the deacylated tRNAs may be recharged by aaRSs bound to the ribosome and reused at the next occurrence of a codon encoding the same amino acid. These results suggest a mechanism of tRNA recycling in which aaRSs associate with the L7/L12 stalk region to recapture the tRNAs released from the preceding ribosome in polysomes.

Making proteins green; biosynthesis of chlorophyll-binding proteins in cyanobacteria

Chlorophyll (Chl) is an essential component of the photosynthetic apparatus. Embedded into Chl-binding proteins, Chl molecules play a central role in light harvesting and charge separation within the photosystems. It is critical for the photosynthetic cell to not only ensure the synthesis of a sufficient amount of new Chl-binding proteins but also avoids any misbalance between apoprotein synthesis and the formation of potentially phototoxic Chl molecules. According to the available data, Chl-binding proteins are translated on membrane bound ribosomes and their integration into the membrane is provided by the SecYEG/Alb3 translocon machinery. It appears that the insertion of Chl molecules into growing polypeptide is a prerequisite for the correct folding and finishing of Chl-binding protein synthesis. Although the Chl biosynthetic pathway is fairly well-described on the level of enzymatic steps, a link between Chl biosynthesis and the synthesis of apoproteins remains elusive. In this review, I summarize the current knowledge about this issue putting emphasis on protein-protein interactions. I present a model of the Chl biosynthetic pathway organized into a multi-enzymatic complex and physically attached to the SecYEG/Alb3 translocon. Localization of this hypothetical large biosynthetic centre in the cyanobacterial cell is also discussed as well as regulatory mechanisms coordinating the rate of Chl and apoprotein synthesis.

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase complexes: molecular multitasking revealed

The accurate synthesis of proteins, dictated by the corresponding nucleotide sequence encoded in mRNA, is essential for cell growth and survival. Central to this process are the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs), which provide amino acid substrates for the growing polypeptide chain in the form of aminoacyl-tRNAs. The aaRSs are essential for coupling the correct amino acid and tRNA molecules, but are also known to associate in higher order complexes with proteins involved in processes beyond translation. Multiprotein complexes containing aaRSs are found in all three domains of life playing roles in splicing, apoptosis, viral assembly, and regulation of transcription and translation. An overview of the complexes aaRSs form in all domains of life is presented, demonstrating the extensive network of connections between the translational machinery and cellular components involved in a myriad of essential processes beyond protein synthesis.

An aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase:elongation factor complex for substrate channeling in archaeal translation

Translation requires the specific attachment of amino acids to tRNAs by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) and the subsequent delivery of aminoacyl-tRNAs to the ribosome by elongation factor 1 alpha (EF-1α). Interactions between EF-1α and various aaRSs have been described in eukaryotes, but the role of these complexes remains unclear. To investigate possible interactions between EF-1α and other cellular components, a yeast two-hybrid screen was performed for the archaeon Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus. EF-1α was found to form a stable complex with leucyl-tRNA synthetase (LeuRS; K_D = 0.7 μM). Complex formation had little effect on EF-1α activity, but increased the k_cat for Leu-tRNA^Leu synthesis ∼8-fold. In addition, EF-1α co-purified with the archaeal multi-synthetase complex (MSC) comprised of LeuRS, LysRS and ProRS, suggesting the existence of a larger aaRS:EF-1α complex in archaea. These interactions between EF-1α and the archaeal MSC contribute to translational fidelity both by enhancing the aminoacylation efficiencies of the three aaRSs in the complex and by coupling two stages of translation: aminoacylation of cognate tRNAs and their subsequent channeling to the ribosome.

Peroxin Pex21p interacts with the C-terminal noncatalytic domain of yeast seryl-tRNA synthetase and forms a specific ternary complex with tRNA(Ser)

The seryl-tRNA synthetase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae interacts with the peroxisome biogenesis-related factor Pex21p. Several deletion mutants of seryl-tRNA synthetase were constructed and inspected for their ability to interact with Pex21p in a yeast two-hybrid assay, allowing mapping of the synthetase domain required for complex assembly. Deletion of the 13 C-terminal amino acids abolished Pex21p binding to seryl-tRNA synthetase. The catalytic parameters of purified truncated seryl-tRNA synthetase, determined in the serylation reaction, were found to be almost identical to those of the native enzyme. In vivo loss of interaction with Pex21p was confirmed in vitro by coaffinity purification. These data indicate that the C-terminally appended domain of yeast seryl-tRNA synthetase does not participate in substrate binding, but instead is required for association with Pex21p. We further determined that Pex21p does not directly bind tRNA, and nor does it possess a tRNA-binding motif, but it instead participates in the formation of a specific ternary complex with seryl-tRNA synthetase and tRNA(Ser), strengthening the interaction of seryl-tRNA synthetase with its cognate tRNA(Ser).

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The size distribution of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase activity was investigated in cell extracts prepared from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bio-Gel A-5M chromatography of 105,000 g supernatants separated isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase activity into three peaks, with apparent molecular masses (Da) of about 100,000, 350,000 and 10(6) or greater. Similar results were obtained with synthetases specific for glutamic acid, serine and tyrosine. Sucrose-density-gradient centrifugation of yeast supernatants also provided evidence for the existence of synthetase complexes. These data provide the first evidence for the existence of a high-molecular-mass aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase complex in yeast, perhaps similar to those reported in higher eukaryotes.

Coordination of catalytic activities within enzyme complexes

If two enzymes are physically and permanently associated as a bi-enzyme complex and if these enzymes catalyze non-consecutive chemical reactions, either of these reactions may inhibit or activate the other. If these reactions belong to two different metabolic cycles, the functioning of one of these cycles will control the fine tuning of the other. Thus simple kinetic considerations lead to the conclusion that, owing to the spatial organization of enzymes as multimolecular complexes, a fine tuning and a coordination of different metabolic networks, or cycles, may be exerted. It thus appears that channelling of reaction intermediates within a multienzyme complex does not represent the only functional advantage brought about by this type of spatial molecular organization.

High-molecular-weight forms of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and tRNA modification enzymes in Escherichia coli

The presence of high-molecular-weight complexes of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases in Escherichia coli has been reported (C. L. Harris, J. Bacteriol. 169:2718-2723, 1987). In the current study, Bio-Gel A-5M gel chromatography of 105,000 x g supernatant preparations from E. coli Q13 indicated high molecular weights for both tRNA methylase (300,000) and tRNA sulfurtransferase (450,000). These tRNA modification enzymes did not appear to exist in the same multienzymic complex. On the other hand, 4-thiouridine sulfurtransferase eluted with aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase activity on Bio-Gel A-5M, and both of these activities were cosedimented after further centrifugation of cell supernatants at 160,000 x g for 18 h. Despite this evidence for association of the sulfurtransferase with the synthetase complex, isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase and tRNA sulfurtransferase were totally resolved from each other by DEAE-Sephacel chromatography. Subsequent gel chromatography showed little change in their elution positions on agarose. Hence, either nonspecific aggregation occurred here, or the modification enzymes studied are not members of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase complex in E. coli. These findings do suggest that some bacterial tRNA modification enzymes are present in multiprotein complexes of high molecular weight.

Mechanism of mupirocin transport into sensitive and resistant bacteria

Pseudomonic acid A (mupirocin) blocks protein synthesis in bacteria by inhibition of bacterial isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase. [16, 17-3H]mupirocin, isolated from a methionine auxotroph of Pseudomonas fluorescens, was used to study transport of this antibiotic into sensitive and resistant strains of Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli. The transport of mupirocin into sensitive bacteria was energy independent and temperature dependent (decreased uptake at lower temperatures), indicating non-carrier-mediated passive diffusion. Uptake was also saturable with time or increasing antibiotic concentration. The saturable intracellular binding site, most likely the target isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase as determined by the amount of bound mupirocin (2,700 to 3,100 molecules per cell), caused concentration of the antibiotic within the cell. E. coli transformed with a plasmid containing ileS overproduced the target enzyme and demonstrated greater accumulation of mupirocin than a strain containing a control plasmid. The concentrations needed to half saturate (Kd) these binding sites in B. subtilis and S. aureus were 35 and 7 nM, respectively. In gram-positive organisms trained for mupirocin resistance, uptake was not saturable with increasing antibiotic concentration, and intra- and extracellular concentrations of drug equilibrated with time. Kinetic analysis of crude isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase from trained and untrained B. subtilis strains revealed differences in apparent Ki for mupirocin (resistant strain SB23T, Ki = 71.1 nM; sensitive strain SB23, Ki = 33.5 nM), while the Km for isoleucine remained unchanged (2.7 to 2.9 microM). A Km of 0.4 micromolar isoleucine and Ki of 24 nM mupirocin was demonstrated for isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase from sensitive S. aureus 730a, while no isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase activity was detected in extracts of resistance-trained S. aureus 3000 even at 40 micromolar isoleucine, suggesting instability of the enzyme. Free isoleucine pools differed between sensitive (0.26 micromolar) and resistance-trained (1.06 micromolar) S. aureus. Our results demonstrate that (i) mupirocin enters cells by passive diffusion, (ii) mupirocin concentrates in sensitive bacteria due to binding to isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase, and (iii) resistance to mupirocin involves restricted access to the binding site of isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase.