The TACAN4TGCA motif upstream from the -35 region in the sigma70-sigmaS-dependent Pm promoter of the TOL plasmid is the minimum DNA segment required for transcription stimulation by XylS regulators

Regulation of the expression level of transcription factor XylS reveals new functional insight into its induction mechanism at the Pm promoter

BACKGROUND

XylS is the positive regulator of the inducible Pm promoter, originating from Pseudomonas putida, where the system controls a biochemical pathway involved in degradation of aromatic hydrocarbons, which also act as inducers. The XylS/Pm positive regulator/promoter system is used for recombinant gene expression and the output from Pm is known to be sensitive to the intracellular XylS concentration.

RESULTS

By constructing a synthetic operon consisting of xylS and luc, the gene encoding luciferase, relative XylS expression levels could be monitored indirectly at physiological concentrations. Expression of XylS from inducible promoters allowed control over a more than 800-fold range, however, the corresponding output from Pm covered only an about five-fold range. The maximum output from Pm could not be increased by introducing more copies of the promoter in the cells. Interestingly, a previously reported XylS variant (StEP-13), known to strongly stimulate expression from Pm, caused the same maximum activity from Pm as wild-type XylS at high XylS expression levels. Under uninduced conditions expression from Pm also increased as a function of XylS expression levels, and at very high concentrations the maximum activity from Pm was the same as in the presence of inducer.

CONCLUSION

According to our proposed model, which is in agreement with current knowledge, the regulator, XylS, can exist in three states: monomers, dimers, and aggregates. Only the dimers are active and able to induce expression from Pm. Their maximum intracellular concentration and the corresponding output from Pm are limited by the concentration-dependent conversion into inactive aggregates. Maximization of the induction ratio at Pm can be obtained by expression of XylS at the level where aggregation occurs, which might be exploited for recombinant gene expression. The results described here also indicate that there might exist variants of XylS which can exist at higher active dimer concentrations and thus lead to increased expression levels from Pm.

AntR-mediated bidirectional activation of antA and antR, anthranilate degradative genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Bidirectional activation of transcription is a peculiar regulation mode of gene expression. In this study, we show that genes involved in the metabolism of anthranilate, a precursor of biosynthesis of tryptophan and Pseudomonas quinolone signal (PQS) are regulated by this bidirectional activation of transcription. Anthranilate is degraded by anthranilate dioxygenase complex encoded by antABC operon, and AntR, a LysR-type regulator encoded by antR activates the transcription of antABC operon in the presence of anthranilate. In P. aeruginosa, antABC and antR are divergently located and AntR binds to the intergenic region between antA and antR to activate the antABC transcription. In this study, we determined the transcriptional start site of the antA promoter (antA(p)) and AntR-responsive elements (AREs) in P. aeruginosa. The upstream deletion analysis of antA(p) and in vitro gel shift assay with purified AntR showed that there are two AREs at -194 to -148 and -88 to -47 regions. We also found that AntR activates antR promoter (antR(p)) in the opposite direction and both AREs are important in the bidirectional activation of antA(p) and antR(p). Two AREs have different binding affinities to AntR and the strength of transcriptional activation was dramatically asymmetric depending on the direction. We suggest that the different affinities of two AREs may explain the asymmetry of the bidirectional activation by AntR.

Sequential XylS-CTD binding to the Pm promoter induces DNA bending prior to activation

XylS protein, a member of the AraC family of transcriptional regulators, comprises a C-terminal domain (CTD) involved in DNA binding and an N-terminal domain required for effector binding and protein dimerization. In the absence of benzoate effectors, the N-terminal domain behaves as an intramolecular repressor of the DNA binding domain. To date, the poor solubility properties of the full-length protein have restricted XylS analysis to genetic approaches in vivo. To characterize the molecular consequences of XylS binding to its operator, we used a recombinant XylS-CTD variant devoid of the N-terminal domain. The resulting protein was soluble and monomeric in solution and activated transcription from its cognate promoter in an effector-independent manner. XylS binding sites in the Pm promoter present an intrinsic curvature of 35 degrees centered at position -42 within the proximal site. Gel retardation and DNase footprint analysis showed XylS-CTD binding to Pm occurred sequentially: first a XylS-CTD monomer binds to the proximal site overlapping the RNA polymerase binding sequence to form complex I. This first event increased Pm bending to 50 degrees and was followed by the binding of the second monomer, which further increased the observed global curvature to 98 degrees. This generated a concomitant shift in the bending center to a region centered at position -51 when the two sites were occupied (complex II). We propose a model in which DNA structure and binding sequences strongly influence XylS binding events previous to transcription activation.

Roles of effectors in XylS-dependent transcription activation: intramolecular domain derepression and DNA binding

XylS, an AraC family protein, activates transcription from the benzoate degradation pathway Pm promoter in the presence of a substrate effector such as 3-methylbenzoate (3MB). We developed a procedure to obtain XylS-enriched preparations which proved suitable to analyze its activation mechanism. XylS showed specific 3MB-independent binding to its target operator, which became strictly 3MB dependent in a dimerization-defective mutant. We demonstrated that the N-terminal domain of the protein can make linker-independent interactions with the C-terminal domain and inhibit its capacity to bind DNA. Interactions are hampered in the presence of 3MB effector. We propose two independent roles for 3MB in XylS activation: in addition to its known influence favoring protein dimerization, the effector is able to modify XylS conformation to trigger N-terminal domain intramolecular derepression. We also show that activation by XylS involves RNA polymerase recruitment to the Pm promoter as demonstrated by chromatin immunoprecipitation assays. RNA polymerase switching in Pm transcription was reproduced in in vitro transcription assays. All sigma(32)-, sigma(38)-, and sigma(70)-dependent RNA polymerases were able to carry out Pm transcription in a rigorous XylS-dependent manner, as demonstrated by the formation of open complexes only in the presence of the regulator.

Members of the IclR family of bacterial transcriptional regulators function as activators and/or repressors

Members of the IclR family of regulators are proteins with around 250 residues. The IclR family is best defined by a profile covering the effector binding domain. This is supported by structural data and by a number of mutants showing that effector specificity lies within a pocket in the C-terminal domain. These regulators have a helix-turn-helix DNA binding motif in the N-terminal domain and bind target promoters as dimers or as a dimer of dimers. This family comprises regulators acting as repressors, activators and proteins with a dual role. Members of the IclR family control genes whose products are involved in the glyoxylate shunt in Enterobacteriaceae, multidrug resistance, degradation of aromatics, inactivation of quorum-sensing signals, determinants of plant pathogenicity and sporulation. No clear consensus exists on the architecture of DNA binding sites for IclR activators: the MhpR binding site is formed by a 15-bp palindrome, but the binding sites of PcaU and PobR are three perfect 10-bp sequence repetitions forming an inverted and a direct repeat. IclR-type positive regulators bind their promoter DNA in the absence of effector. The mechanism of repression differs among IclR-type regulators. In most of them the binding sites of RNA polymerase and the repressor overlap, so that the repressor occludes RNA polymerase binding. In other cases the repressor binding site is distal to the RNA polymerase, so that the repressor destabilizes the open complex.

RNA polymerase holoenzymes can share a single transcription start site for the Pm promoter. Critical nucleotides in the -7 to -18 region are needed to select between RNA polymerase with sigma38 or sigma32

The Pm promoter of the benzoate meta-cleavage pathway is transcribed with E sigma32 or E sigma38 according to the growth phase, with an identical transcriptional start site. To investigate sequence determinants in the interaction between either of the two RNA polymerases and Pm, all possible single mutants between positions -7 and -18 were generated, and the activity in the exponential and stationary phases of the resulting mutant promoters was compared. The results precisely delimited a -10 element between positions -7 and -12 (TAGGCT), which defined a promoter sharing nucleotides with both sigma38 and sigma32 consensus. The first two and the last positions of this hexamer were crucial for recognition by both polymerases. Position -10 was the only one specifically recognized by E sigma38, whereas positions -8, -9, and the C-track between positions -14 and -17 were important for specific E sigma32 recognition. Western blots showed that sigma32 was only detectable in the exponential phase, and sigma38 appeared in the early stationary phase. In the rpoH mutant KY1429, sigma38 was already present in the exponential growth phase both free and bound to the RNA polymerase core, in good correlation with the transcription levels found. Pm seems to be optimized for recognition by sigma32 as an initial response to the addition of effector to the medium and allows binding of the adaptable sigma38-dependent RNA polymerase in the stationary phase. XylS is always required for Pm transcription. Therefore, the mechanism that controls Pm expression involves specific nucleotide sequences, the abundance of free and core-bound sigma32 and sigma38 factors during growth, and the presence of the regulator activated by an effector.

Inferring the genetic network ofm-xylene metabolism through expression profiling of thexylgenes ofPseudomonas putidamt-2

A subgenomic array of structural and regulatory genes of the TOL plasmid pWW0 of Pseudomonas putida mt-2 has been constructed to sort out the interplay between m-xylene catabolism and the environmental stress brought about by this aromatic chemical. To this end, xyl sequences were spotted along with groups of selected P. putida genes, the transcription of which become descriptors of distinct physiological conditions. The expression of the TOL pathway in response to pathway substrates was thus profiled, uncovering a regulatory network that overcomes and expands the predictions made by projecting known data from individual promoters. First, post-transcriptional checks appear to mitigate the burden caused by non-productive induction of the TOL operons. Second, the fate of different segments of the polycistronic mRNAs from the upper and lower TOL operons varies depending on the metabolism of their inducers. Finally, m-xylene triggers a noticeable heat shock, the onset of which does interfere with optimal expression of catabolic genes. These results reveal a degree of regulatory partnership between TOL plasmid-encoded functions and host physiology that go beyond transcription initiation control.

Bacterial transcriptional regulators for degradation pathways of aromatic compounds

Human activities have resulted in the release and introduction into the environment of a plethora of aromatic chemicals. The interest in discovering how bacteria are dealing with hazardous environmental pollutants has driven a large research community and has resulted in important biochemical, genetic, and physiological knowledge about the degradation capacities of microorganisms and their application in bioremediation, green chemistry, or production of pharmacy synthons. In addition, regulation of catabolic pathway expression has attracted the interest of numerous different groups, and several catabolic pathway regulators have been exemplary for understanding transcription control mechanisms. More recently, information about regulatory systems has been used to construct whole-cell living bioreporters that are used to measure the quality of the aqueous, soil, and air environment. The topic of biodegradation is relatively coherent, and this review presents a coherent overview of the regulatory systems involved in the transcriptional control of catabolic pathways. This review summarizes the different regulatory systems involved in biodegradation pathways of aromatic compounds linking them to other known protein families. Specific attention has been paid to describing the genetic organization of the regulatory genes, promoters, and target operon(s) and to discussing present knowledge about signaling molecules, DNA binding properties, and operator characteristics, and evidence from regulatory mutants. For each regulator family, this information is combined with recently obtained protein structural information to arrive at a possible mechanism of transcription activation. This demonstrates the diversity of control mechanisms existing in catabolic pathways.

XylS activator and RNA polymerase binding sites at the Pm promoter overlap

Transcription from the TOL plasmid meta-cleavage pathway operon, Pm, depends on the XylS protein being activated by a benzoate effector. The XylS binding sites are two imperfect 5'-TGCAN(6)GGNTA-3' direct repeats located between positions -70/-56 and -49/-35 [González-Pérez et al. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 2286-2290]. An intrinsic bending of 40 degrees, which is not essential for transcription, is centered at position -43. We have determined the potential overlap between the XylS and RNA polymerase binding sites. The insertion of 2 or more bp between C and T at positions -37 and -36 abolished transcription activation by the wild-type XylS and by XylSS229I, a mutant with increased affinity for the XylS binding sites. In contrast, a 1-bp insertion at -37 was permissible, although when in addition to the 1-bp insertion at -37 the mutant promoter had a point mutation at the XylS binding site (C-47-->T), transcription was abolished with the wild-type XylS protein, but not with XylSS229I. The overlap between the proximal XylS binding site and the -35 region recognized by RNA polymerase at positions -35 and -36 appears to be critical for transcription.

Residues 137 and 153 at the N terminus of the XylS protein influence the effector profile of this transcriptional regulator and the sigma factor used by RNA polymerase to stimulate transcription from its cognate promoter

The 321-residue XylS and XylS1 proteins, encoded by the pWW0 and pWW53 plasmids respectively, differ in only 5 residues at positions 4, 53, 90, 137, and 153. As a result, the effector profile of XylS is wider than that of XylS1, and XylS mediates higher levels of transcription from its cognate-regulatable promoter than does XylS1. We generated a series of XylS-pWW0 mutants and found that the single mutants Asp-137-->Glu and His-153-->Asn exhibited an activation pattern different from that of the wild-type regulator. In the double-mutant XylSD137E,H153N the effector profile for benzoates was similar to that of XylS1. This suggests that these two residues are crucial for effector recognition and regulator activation to stimulate transcription. XylS-dependent transcription from its cognate promoter is mediated by RNA polymerase with sigma(32) or sigma(38), whereas XylS1 uses RNA polymerase with sigma(32) or sigma(70). We also found that point mutations at positions 137 and 153 of XylS led RNA polymerase to mediate transcription with sigma(70) rather than with sigma(38), as demonstrated by primer extension analysis in a sigma(70)-thermosensitive background proficient and deficient in sigma(38). This suggests that a positive transcriptional regulator can choose the RNA polymerase complex that mediates transcription from a given promoter.

Residues 137 and 153 of XylS influence contacts with the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit

XylS and XylS1 are transcriptional regulators that stimulate transcription from the Pm promoter for the meta-cleavage pathway operon for alkylbenzoate degradation. These regulators that differ in five amino acids interact with alpha-CTD domain of RNA polymerase. These interactions take place preferentially through residues 291 in XylS and 289 in XylS1. Substitution at position 137 and 153 in XylS influence the interactions with alpha-CTD because single and double mutants in these positions turned preferential interactions to residue 289.

Interactions of the XylS regulators with the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit influence the expression level from the cognate Pm promoter

The Pseudomonas putida meta-cleavage operon encodes the enzymes for the catabolism of alkylbenzoates. Activation of meta-operon transcription is mediated by the XylS protein which, upon activation by effectors, binds two sites between -70 and -35 with respect to the main transcription initiation point at the Pm promoter. Two naturally occurring regulators, XylS and XylS1, that differ by only five amino acids, have been analyzed with regard to potential interactions of these positive regulators with the C-terminal domain of the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase (alpha-CTD). For these studies we expressed a derivative of alpha deprived of the entire C-terminal domain (alpha-Delta235) and found that expression from Pm with XylS or XylS1 was significantly decreased. To discern whether alpha-CTD activation depended on interactions with DNA and/or XylS proteins we tested a large collection of alanine substitutions within alpha-CTD. Most substitutions that had an effect on XylS and XylS1-dependent transcription were located in or adjacent to helix 1 and 4, which are known to be involved in alpha-CTD interactions with DNA. Two alanine substitutions in helix 3 (residues 287 and 291) identified a putative region of alpha-CTD/XylS regulator interactions.

Genetic evidence that transcription activation by RhaS involves specific amino acid contacts with sigma 70

RhaS activates transcription of the Escherichia coli rhaBAD and rhaT operons in response to L-rhamnose and is a member of the AraC/XylS family of transcription activators. We wished to determine whether sigma(70) might be an activation target for RhaS. We found that sigma(70) K593 and R599 appear to be important for RhaS activation at both rhaBAD and rhaT, but only at truncated promoters lacking the binding site for the second activator, CRP. To determine whether these positively charged sigma(70) residues might contact RhaS, we constructed alanine substitutions at negatively charged residues in the C-terminal domain of RhaS. Substitutions at four RhaS residues, E181A, D182A, D186A, and D241A, were defective at both truncated promoters. Finally, we assayed combinations of the RhaS and sigma(70) substitutions and found that RhaS D241 and sigma(70) R599 met the criteria for interacting residues at both promoters. Molecular modeling suggests that sigma(70) R599 is located in very close proximity to RhaS D241; hence, this work provides the first evidence for a specific residue within an AraC/XylS family protein that may contact sigma(70). More than 50% of AraC/XylS family members have Asp or Glu at the position of RhaS D241, suggesting that this interaction with sigma(70) may be conserved.

Mutational analysis of the highly conserved C-terminal residues of the XylS protein, a member of the AraC family of transcriptional regulators

The XylS protein of the TOL plasmid of Pseudomonas putida belongs to the so-called AraC/XylS family of regulators, that includes more than 100 different bacterial proteins. A conserved stretch of about 100 amino acids is present at the C-terminal end. This conserved region is believed to contain seven alpha-helices, including two helix-turn-helix (HTH) DNA binding motifs (alpha(2)-T-alpha(3) and alpha(5)-Talpha-(6)), connected by a linker alpha-helix (alpha(4)), and two flanking alpha-helices (alpha(1) and alpha(7)). The second HTH motif is the region with the highest homology in the proteins of the family, with certain residues showing almost 90% identity. We have constructed XylS single mutants in the most conserved residues and have analysed their ability to stimulate transcription from its cognate promoter, Pm, fused to 'lacZ. The analysis revealed that mutations in the alpha(5)-helix conserved residues had little effect on the XylS transcriptional activity, whereas the distribution of polarity in the alpha(6)-helix was important for the activity. The strongest effect of the mutations was observed in conserved residues located outside the DNA binding domain, namely, Gly-290 in the turn between the two helices, Pro-309 located downstream of alpha(6), and Leu-313, in the small last helix alpha(7), that seems to play an important role in the activation of RNA-polymerase. Our analysis shows that conservation of amino acids in the family reflects structural requirements rather than functionality in specific DNA interactions.

Pm promoter expression mutants and their use in broad-host-range RK2 plasmid vectors

By coupling the Pm/xylS promoter system to minimal replicons of the broad-host-range plasmid RK2 we recently showed that such vectors are useful for both high- and low-level inducible expression of cloned genes in gram-negative bacteria. In this report, we extend this potential by identifying point mutations in or near the -10 transcriptional region of Pm. Point mutations leading to gene-independent enhancements of expression levels of the induced state or reduced background expression levels were identified using Escherichia coli as a host. By combining these mutations an additive effect in expression levels from the constructed Pm was observed. The highest induced expression level was obtained by inserting an E. coli consensus sigma70 - 10 recognition region. Most of the remaining activities in the reduced-background mutations appeared to originate from a transcriptional start site other than Pm. The effects of some of these mutations were also analyzed in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and were found to act similarly, but less pronounced in this host.

Parameters affecting gene expression from the Pm promoter in gram-negative bacteria

The Pm promoter inserted chromosomally or in broad-host-range replicons based on plasmid RSF1010 or RK2 are useful systems for both high- and low-level expression of cloned genes in several gram-negative bacterial species. The positive Pm regulator XylS is activated by certain substituted benzoic acid derivatives, and here we show that these effectors induce expression of Pm at similar relative ranking levels in both Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa However, the kinetics of expression was not the same in the two organisms. Different carbon sources and dissolved oxygen levels displayed limited effects on expression, but surprisingly the pH of the growth medium was found to be of major importance. By combining the effects of genetic and environmental parameters, expression from Pm could be varied over a ten-thousand- to a hundred-thousand-fold continuous range, and as an example of its applications we showed that Pm can be used to control the xanthan biosynthesis in Xanthomonas campestris.

Critical nucleotides in the upstream region of the XylS-dependent TOL meta-cleavage pathway operon promoter as deduced from analysis of mutants

The Pm promoter, dependent on TOL plasmid XylS regulator, which is activated by benzoate effectors, drives transcription of the meta-cleavage pathway for the metabolism of alkylbenzoates. This promoter is unique in that in vivo transcription is mediated by RNA-polymerase with different sigma factors. In vivo footprinting analysis shows that XylS interacted with nucleotides in the -40 to -70 region. In vivo and in vitro methylation of Pm shows extensive methylation of T at position -42 in the bottom strand, suggesting that it represents a key distortion point that may favor XylS/RNA polymerase interactions. Methylation of T-42 was highest in cells bearing XylS and in the presence of an effector. Gs in the -47 to -61 region appeared to be more protected in cells harboring XylS in the presence than in the absence of the effector. Almost 100 mutants in the Pm region between -41 and -78 were generated; transcriptional analysis of these mutants defined the XylS target as two direct repeats with the sequence TGCAN6GGNCA. These motifs cover the -70 to -56 and the -49 to -35 regions. Single point mutations revealed that nucleotides located at -49 to -46 and at -59, -60, -62, and -70 are the most critical for appropriate XylS-Pm interactions.

Multidrug resistance following expression of the Escherichia coli marA gene in Mycobacterium smegmatis

Expression of the Escherichia coli multiple antibiotic resistance marA gene cloned in Mycobacterium smegmatis produced increased resistance to multiple antimicrobial agents, including rifampin, isoniazid, ethambutol, tetracycline, and chloramphenicol. Cloned marR or marA cloned in the antisense direction had no effect. Resistance changes were lost with spontaneous loss of the plasmid bearing marA. A MarA mutant protein, having an insertional mutation within either of its two alpha-helices of the first putative helix-turn-helix domain, failed to produce the multiresistance phenotype in E. coli and M. smegmatis, indicating that this region is critical for MarA function. These results strongly suggest that E. coli marA functions in M. smegmatis and that a mar-like regulatory system exists in this organism.

Arac/XylS family of transcriptional regulators

The ArC/XylS family of prokaryotic positive transcriptional regulators includes more than 100 proteins and polypeptides derived from open reading frames translated from DNA sequences. Members of this family are widely distributed and have been found in the gamma subgroup of the proteobacteria, low- and high-G + C-content gram-positive bacteria, and cyanobacteria. These proteins are defined by a profile that can be accessed from PROSITE PS01124. Members of the family are about 300 amino acids long and have three main regulatory functions in common: carbon metabolism, stress response, and pathogenesis. Multiple alignments of the proteins of the family define a conserved stretch of 99 amino acids usually located at the C-terminal region of the regulator and connected to a nonconserved region via a linker. The conserved stretch contains all the elements required to bind DNA target sequences and to activate transcription from cognate promoters. Secondary analysis of the conserved region suggests that it contains two potential alpha-helix-turn-alpha-helix DNA binding motifs. The first, and better-fitting motif is supported by biochemical data, whereas existing biochemical data neither support nor refute the proposal that the second region possesses this structure. The phylogenetic relationship suggests that members of the family have recruited the nonconserved domain(s) into a series of existing domains involved in DNA recognition and transcription stimulation and that this recruited domain governs the role that the regulator carries out. For some regulators, it has been demonstrated that the nonconserved region contains the dimerization domain. For the regulators involved in carbon metabolism, the effector binding determinants are also in this region. Most regulators belonging to the AraC/XylS family recognize multiple binding sites in the regulated promoters. One of the motifs usually overlaps or is adjacent to the -35 region of the cognate promoters. Footprinting assays have suggested that these regulators protect a stretch of up to 20 bp in the target promoters, and multiple alignments of binding sites for a number of regulators have shown that the proteins recognize short motifs within the protected region.

Transcriptional control of the Pseudomonas TOL plasmid catabolic operons is achieved through an interplay of host factors and plasmid-encoded regulators

The xyl genes of Pseudomonas putida TOL plasmid that specify catabolism of toluene and xylenes are organized in four transcriptional units: the upper-operon xylUWCAMBN for conversion of toluene/xylenes into benzoate/alkylbenzoates; the meta-operon xylXYZLTEGFJQKIH, which encodes the enzymes for further conversion of these compounds into Krebs cycle intermediates; and xylS and xylR, which are involved in transcriptional control. The XylS and XylR proteins are members of the XylS/AraC and NtrC families, respectively, of transcriptional regulators. The xylS gene is constitutively expressed at a low level from the Ps2 promoter. The XylS protein is activated by interaction with alkylbenzoates, and this active form stimulates transcription from Pm by sigma70- or sigmaS-containing RNA polymerase (the meta loop). The xylR gene is also expressed constitutively. The XylR protein, which in the absence of effectors binds in a nonactive form to target DNA sequences, is activated by aromatic hydrocarbons and ATP; it subsequently undergoes multimerization and structural changes that result in stimulation of transcription from Pu of the upper operon. This latter process is assisted by the IHF protein and mediated by sigma54-containing RNA polymerase. Once activated, the XylR protein also stimulates transcription from the Ps1 promoter of xylS without interfering with expression from Ps2. This process is assisted by the HU protein and is mediated by sigma54-containing RNA polymerase. As a consequence of hyperexpression of the xylS gene, the XylS protein is hyperproduced and stimulates transcription from Pm even in the absence of effectors (the cascade loop). The two sigma54-dependent promoters are additionally subject to global (catabolite repression) control.