Effect of altered spacing between uhpT promoter elements on transcription activation

Identification of regulatory targets for the bacterial Nus factor complex

Nus factors are broadly conserved across bacterial species, and are often essential for viability. A complex of five Nus factors (NusB, NusE, NusA, NusG and SuhB) is considered to be a dedicated regulator of ribosomal RNA folding, and has been shown to prevent Rho-dependent transcription termination. Here, we identify an additional cellular function for the Nus factor complex in Escherichia coli: repression of the Nus factor-encoding gene, suhB. This repression occurs primarily by translation inhibition, followed by Rho-dependent transcription termination. Thus, the Nus factor complex can prevent or promote Rho activity depending on the gene context. Conservation of putative NusB/E binding sites upstream of Nus factor genes suggests that Nus factor autoregulation occurs in many bacterial species. Additionally, many putative NusB/E binding sites are also found upstream of other genes in diverse species, and we demonstrate Nus factor regulation of one such gene in Citrobacter koseri. We conclude that Nus factors have an evolutionarily widespread regulatory function beyond ribosomal RNA, and that they are often autoregulatory.

Regulatory mechanism of the three-component system HptRSA in glucose-6-phosphate uptake in Staphylococcus aureus

Glucose-6-phosphate (G6P) is a common alternative carbon source for various bacteria, and its uptake usually relies on the hexose phosphate antiporter UhpT. In the human pathogenic bacterium Staphylococcus aureus, the ability to utilize different nutrients, particularly alternative carbon source uptake in glucose-limiting conditions, is essential for its fitness in the host environment during the infectious process. It has been reported that G6P uptake in S. aureus is regulated by the three-component system HptRSA. When G6P is provided as the only carbon source, HptRSA could sense extracellular G6P and activate uhpT expression to facilitate G6P utilization. However, the regulatory mechanism of HptRSA is still unclear. In this study, we further investigated the HptRSA system in S. aureus. First, we confirmed that HptRSA is necessary for the normal growth of this pathogen in chemically defined medium with G6P supplementation, and we discovered that HptRSA could exclusively sense extracellular G6P compared to the other organophosphates we tested. Next, using isothermal titration calorimetry, we found that HptA could bind to G6P, suggesting that it may be the G6P sensor. After that experiment, using an electrophoresis mobility shift assay, we verified that the response regulator HptR could directly bind to the uhpT promoter and identified a putative binding site from -67 to -96-bp. Subsequently, we created different point mutations in the putative binding site and revealed that the entire 30-bp sequence is essential for HptR regulation. In summary, we unveiled the regulatory mechanism of the HptRSA system in S. aureus, HptA most likely functions as the G6P sensor, and HptR could implement its regulatory function by directly binding to a conserved, approximately 30-bp sequence in the uhpT promoter.

Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Impact of Acquired and Intrinsic Fosfomycin Resistance

Bacterial infections caused by antibiotic-resistant isolates have become a major health problem in recent years, since they are very difficult to treat, leading to an increase in morbidity and mortality. Fosfomycin is a broad-spectrum bactericidal antibiotic that inhibits cell wall biosynthesis in both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. This antibiotic has a unique mechanism of action and inhibits the initial step in peptidoglycan biosynthesis by blocking the enzyme, MurA. Fosfomycin has been used successfully for the treatment of urinary tract infections for a long time, but the increased emergence of antibiotic resistance has made fosfomycin a suitable candidate for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens, especially in combination with other therapeutic partners. The acquisition of fosfomycin resistance could threaten the reintroduction of this antibiotic for the treatment of bacterial infection. Here, we analyse the mechanism of action and molecular mechanisms for the development of fosfomycin resistance, including the modification of the antibiotic target, reduced antibiotic uptake and antibiotic inactivation. In addition, we describe the role of each pathway in clinical isolates.

Different requirements for σ Region 4 in BvgA activation of the Bordetella pertussis promoters P(fim3) and P(fhaB)

Bordetella pertussis BvgA is a global response regulator that activates virulence genes, including adhesin-encoding fim3 and fhaB. At the fhaB promoter, P(fhaB), a BvgA binding site lies immediately upstream of the -35 promoter element recognized by Region 4 of the σ subunit of RNA polymerase (RNAP). We demonstrate that σ Region 4 is required for BvgA activation of P(fhaB), a hallmark of Class II activation. In contrast, the promoter-proximal BvgA binding site at P(fim3) includes the -35 region, which is composed of a tract of cytosines that lacks specific sequence information. We demonstrate that σ Region 4 is not required for BvgA activation at P(fim3). Nonetheless, Region 4 mutations that impair its typical interactions with core and with the -35 DNA affect P(fim3) transcription. Hydroxyl radical cleavage using RNAP with σD581C-FeBABE positions Region 4 near the -35 region of P(fim3); cleavage using RNAP with α276C-FeBABE or α302C-FeBABE also positions an α subunit C-terminal domain within the -35 region, on a different helical face from the promoter-proximal BvgA~P dimer. Our results suggest that the -35 region of P(fim3) accommodates a BvgA~P dimer, an α subunit C-terminal domain, and σ Region 4. Molecular modeling suggests how BvgA, σ Region 4, and α might coexist within this DNA in a conformation that suggests a novel mechanism of activation.

Cooperativity in signal transfer through the Uhp system of Escherichia coli

The UhpABC regulatory system in enterobacteria controls the expression of the hexose phosphate transporter UhpT. Signaling is initiated through sensing of extracellular glucose 6-phosphate by membrane-bound UhpC, which in turn modulates the histidine-protein kinase UhpB. Together with the cytoplasmic response regulator UhpA, they constitute a typical two-component regulatory system based on His-to-Asp phosphoryl transfer. Activated (i.e., phosphorylated) UhpA binds to the promoter region of uhpT, resulting in initiation of transcription. We have investigated the contribution of transmembrane signaling (through UhpBC) and intracellular activation (through UhpA) to the overall Uhp response (UhpT expression) in vivo. UhpA activation could be made independent of transmembrane signaling when (Delta)uhpBC cells were grown on pyruvate. Inorganic phosphate interfered with glucose 6-phosphate-dependent, UhpBC-mediated, as well as pyruvate-mediated activation of UhpA. The relationship between the concentration of inducer (glucose 6-phosphate) and the Uhp induction rate was nonhyperbolic, indicating positive cooperativity. The degree of cooperativity was affected by the carbon or energy source available to the cells for growth. As pyruvate-mediated activation of UhpA in (Delta)uhpBC cells could result in considerably stronger UhpT expression than glucose 6-phosphate-dependent activation through UhpBC, the observed positive cooperativity for the overall pathway in wild-type cells may reflect the previously described cooperative binding of UhpA to the uhpT promoter (J. L. Dahl et al., J. Biol. Chem. 272:1910-1919, 1997).

Synergistic transcriptional activation by one regulatory protein in response to two metabolites

BenM is a LysR-type bacterial transcriptional regulator that controls aromatic compound degradation in Acinetobacter sp. ADP1. Here, in vitro transcription assays demonstrated that two metabolites of aromatic compound catabolism, benzoate and cis,cis-muconate, act synergistically to activate gene expression. The level of BenM-regulated benA transcription was significantly higher in response to both compounds than the combined levels due to each alone. These compounds also were more effective together than they were individually in altering the DNase I footprint patterns of BenM-DNA complexes. This type of dual-inducer synergy provides great potential for rapid and large modulations of gene expression and may represent an important, and possibly widespread, feature of transcriptional control.

Mutational scanning and affinity cleavage analysis of UhpA-binding sites in the Escherichia coli uhpT promoter

UhpA, a member of the NarL family of response regulators, activates transcription of the Escherichia coli uhpT gene for the sugar phosphate transporter UhpT in response to extracellular glucose-6-phosphate. UhpA binds with different affinities to adjacent regions in the uhpT promoter, termed the strong-binding (S) region from -80 to -50 and the weak-binding (W) region from -50 to -32. Transcription activation by UhpA is stimulated by the catabolite gene activator protein (CAP)-cyclic AMP complex and depends on the C-terminal domains of the RNA polymerase RpoA and RpoD subunits. Because single-base substitutions in the UhpA-binding region had little effect on promoter activity, nucleotide substitutions in successive 4-bp blocks throughout this region were examined for their effects on promoter activation and UhpA binding. Changes in three of four blocks within the W region substantially impaired the ability of UhpA to bind to this region, to drive expression of a uhpT-lacZ reporter, and to support UhpA-dependent in vitro transcription. These W region variant promoters were strongly stimulated by CAP. Changes in several parts of the S region impaired UhpA binding to both the S and W regions and decreased promoter activity in vivo and in vitro. Thus, binding of UhpA to the W region is crucial for UhpA-dependent activation and depends on occupancy of the S region. None of these substitutions eliminated promoter function. The orientation of UhpA-binding sites was assessed by the affinity cleavage method. The iron chelate FeBABE [iron (S)-1-(p-bromoacetamidobenzyl) EDTA] was covalently attached to engineered cysteine residues near the DNA-binding region in UhpA. Hydroxyl radicals generated by the iron chelate attached at position 187 resulted in DNA strand cleavages in two clusters of sites located in the middle of the S and W regions. These results are consistent with the binding of two dimers of UhpA. Each dimer binds to an inverted repeat of monomer-binding sites with the consensus sequence CCTGRR, where R is A or G, and each is separated by 6 bp. It is likely that members of the NarL family bind to dyad targets, in contrast to the binding of OmpR family response regulators to direct-repeat targets.

A phosphorylation site mutant of OmpR reveals different binding conformations at ompF and ompC

In Escherichia coli, the two-component regulatory system that controls the expression of outer membrane porins in response to environmental osmolarity consists of the sensor kinase EnvZ and the response regulator OmpR. Phosphorylated OmpR activates expression of the OmpF porin at low osmolarity, and at high osmolarity represses ompF transcription and activates expression of OmpC. We have characterized a substitution in the amino-terminal phosphorylation domain of OmpR, T83I, its phenotype is OmpF(-) OmpC(-). The mutant protein is not phosphorylated by small molecule phosphodonors such as acetyl phosphate and phosphoramidate, but it is phosphorylated by the cognate kinase EnvZ. Interestingly, the active site T83I substitution alters the DNA binding properties of the carboxyl-terminal effector domain. DNase I protection assays indicate that DNA binding by the mutant protein is similar to wild-type OmpR at the ompF promoter, but at ompC, the pattern of protection is different from OmpR. Our results indicate that all three of the OmpR binding sites at the ompC promoter must be filled in order to activate gene expression. Furthermore, it appears that OmpR-phosphate must adopt different conformations when bound at ompF and ompC. A model is presented to account for the reciprocal regulation of OmpF and OmpC porin expression.

Glucose-6-phosphate-dependent phosphoryl flow through the Uhp two-component regulatory system

Expression of the UhpT sugar-phosphate transporter in Escherichia coli is regulated at the transcriptional level via the UhpABC signalling cascade. Sensing of extracellular glucose 6-phosphate (G6P), by membrane-bound UhpC, modulates a second membrane-bound protein, UhpB, resulting in autophosphorylation of a conserved histidine residue in the cytoplasmic (transmitter) domain of the latter. Subsequently, this phosphoryl group is transferred to a conserved aspartate residue in the response-regulator UhpA, which then initiates uhpT transcription, via binding to the uhpT promoter region. This study demonstrates the hypothesized transmembrane signal transfer in an ISO membrane set-up, i.e. in a suspension of UhpBC-enriched membrane vesicles, UhpB autophosphorylation is stimulated, in the presence of [gamma-(32)P]ATP, upon intra-vesicular sensing of G6P by UhpC. Subsequently, upon addition of UhpA, very rapid and transient UhpA phosphorylation takes place. When P approximately UhpA is added to G6P-induced UhpBC-enriched membrane vesicles, rapid UhpA dephosphorylation occurs. So, in the G6P-activated state, UhpB phosphatase activity dominates over kinase activity, even in the presence of saturating amounts of G6P. This may imply that maximal in vivo P approximately UhpA levels are low and/or that, to keep sufficient P approximately UhpA accumulated to induce uhpT transcription, the uhpT promoter DNA itself is involved in stabilization/sequestration of P approximately UhpA.

The histidine kinase domain of UhpB inhibits UhpA action at the Escherichia coli uhpT promoter

The histidine kinase (HK) component of many two-component regulatory systems exhibits regulated ability to phosphorylate itself and to participate in transfer of phosphate to and from its cognate response regulator. The signaling system that controls expression of the UhpT sugar phosphate transporter in Escherichia coli in response to external glucose 6-phosphate includes the HK protein UhpB and the polytopic membrane protein UhpC, a UhpT homolog which is required for responsiveness to an inducer and activation of UhpB. The existence of a UhpBC signaling complex is suggested by the requirement for UhpC for the activity of certain constitutively active variants of UhpB, the dominance and epistasis relationships of uhp alleles, and the finding that expression of UhpB in excess of UhpC has a strong dominant-negative effect. Expression of a hybrid protein containing the cytoplasmic C-terminal half of UhpB fused to glutathione S-transferase (GST) also interfered with Uhp signaling. This interference phenotype could not result solely from the phosphatase activity of UhpB, because interference affected both overexpressed UhpA and UhpA variants which are active in the absence of phosphorylation. Variant forms of UhpB which were active in the absence of UhpC carried amino acid substitutions near motifs conserved in HK proteins. The GST fusion protein inhibited the ability of UhpA to bind and activate transcription at the uhpT promoter. Unlike the wild-type situation, a GST fusion variant carrying one of the UhpB-activating substitutions, R324C, displayed autokinase activity and phosphate transfer to UhpA but retained the ability to sequester UhpA when it was altered in the conserved residues important for phosphate transfer. Thus, the default state of UhpB is kinase off, and activation of its phosphate transfer activity requires either the action of UhpC or the occurrence of certain mutations in UhpB. The interference phenotype shown by UhpB in excess of UhpC appears to include the binding and sequestration of UhpA.