1
|
Structural and mechanistic basis of reiterative transcription initiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2022; 119:2115746119. [PMID: 35082149 PMCID: PMC8812562 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2115746119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Reiterative transcription initiation, observed at promoters that contain homopolymeric sequences at the transcription start site, generates RNA products having 5' sequences noncomplementary to the DNA template. Here, using crystallography and cryoelectron microscopy to define structures, protein-DNA photocrosslinking to map positions of RNAP leading and trailing edges relative to DNA, and single-molecule DNA nanomanipulation to assess RNA polymerase (RNAP)-dependent DNA unwinding, we show that RNA extension in reiterative transcription initiation 1) occurs without DNA scrunching; 2) involves a short, 2- to 3-bp, RNA-DNA hybrid; and 3) generates RNA that exits RNAP through the portal by which scrunched nontemplate-strand DNA exits RNAP in standard transcription initiation. The results establish that, whereas RNA extension in standard transcription initiation proceeds through a scrunching mechanism, RNA extension in reiterative transcription initiation proceeds through a slippage mechanism, with slipping of RNA relative to DNA within a short RNA-DNA hybrid, and with extrusion of RNA from RNAP through an alternative RNA exit.
Collapse
|
2
|
Shin Y, Hedglin M, Murakami KS. Structural basis of reiterative transcription from the pyrG and pyrBI promoters by bacterial RNA polymerase. Nucleic Acids Res 2020; 48:2144-2155. [PMID: 31965171 PMCID: PMC7039003 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz1221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2019] [Revised: 12/17/2019] [Accepted: 01/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Reiterative transcription is a non-canonical form of RNA synthesis by RNA polymerase in which a ribonucleotide specified by a single base in the DNA template is repetitively added to the nascent RNA transcript. We previously determined the X-ray crystal structure of the bacterial RNA polymerase engaged in reiterative transcription from the pyrG promoter, which contains eight poly-G RNA bases synthesized using three C bases in the DNA as a template and extends RNA without displacement of the promoter recognition σ factor from the core enzyme. In this study, we determined a series of transcript initiation complex structures from the pyrG promoter using soak–trigger–freeze X-ray crystallography. We also performed biochemical assays to monitor template DNA translocation during RNA synthesis from the pyrG promoter and in vitro transcription assays to determine the length of poly-G RNA from the pyrG promoter variants. Our study revealed how RNA slips on template DNA and how RNA polymerase and template DNA determine length of reiterative RNA product. Lastly, we determined a structure of a transcript initiation complex at the pyrBI promoter and proposed an alternative mechanism of RNA slippage and extension requiring the σ dissociation from the core enzyme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yeonoh Shin
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Center for RNA Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
| | - Mark Hedglin
- Department of Chemistry, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
| | - Katsuhiko S Murakami
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Center for RNA Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bervoets I, Charlier D. Diversity, versatility and complexity of bacterial gene regulation mechanisms: opportunities and drawbacks for applications in synthetic biology. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2019; 43:304-339. [PMID: 30721976 PMCID: PMC6524683 DOI: 10.1093/femsre/fuz001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2018] [Accepted: 01/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Gene expression occurs in two essential steps: transcription and translation. In bacteria, the two processes are tightly coupled in time and space, and highly regulated. Tight regulation of gene expression is crucial. It limits wasteful consumption of resources and energy, prevents accumulation of potentially growth inhibiting reaction intermediates, and sustains the fitness and potential virulence of the organism in a fluctuating, competitive and frequently stressful environment. Since the onset of studies on regulation of enzyme synthesis, numerous distinct regulatory mechanisms modulating transcription and/or translation have been discovered. Mostly, various regulatory mechanisms operating at different levels in the flow of genetic information are used in combination to control and modulate the expression of a single gene or operon. Here, we provide an extensive overview of the very diverse and versatile bacterial gene regulatory mechanisms with major emphasis on their combined occurrence, intricate intertwinement and versatility. Furthermore, we discuss the potential of well-characterized basal expression and regulatory elements in synthetic biology applications, where they may ensure orthogonal, predictable and tunable expression of (heterologous) target genes and pathways, aiming at a minimal burden for the host.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Indra Bervoets
- Research Group of Microbiology, Department of Bioengineering Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Daniel Charlier
- Research Group of Microbiology, Department of Bioengineering Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Charlier D, Nguyen Le Minh P, Roovers M. Regulation of carbamoylphosphate synthesis in Escherichia coli: an amazing metabolite at the crossroad of arginine and pyrimidine biosynthesis. Amino Acids 2018; 50:1647-1661. [PMID: 30238253 PMCID: PMC6245113 DOI: 10.1007/s00726-018-2654-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2018] [Accepted: 09/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
In all organisms, carbamoylphosphate (CP) is a precursor common to the synthesis of arginine and pyrimidines. In Escherichia coli and most other Gram-negative bacteria, CP is produced by a single enzyme, carbamoylphosphate synthase (CPSase), encoded by the carAB operon. This particular situation poses a question of basic physiological interest: what are the metabolic controls coordinating the synthesis and distribution of this high-energy substance in view of the needs of both pathways? The study of the mechanisms has revealed unexpected moonlighting gene regulatory activities of enzymes and functional links between mechanisms as diverse as gene regulation and site-specific DNA recombination. At the level of enzyme production, various regulatory mechanisms were found to cooperate in a particularly intricate transcriptional control of a pair of tandem promoters. Transcription initiation is modulated by an interplay of several allosteric DNA-binding transcription factors using effector molecules from three different pathways (arginine, pyrimidines, purines), nucleoid-associated factors (NAPs), trigger enzymes (enzymes with a second unlinked gene regulatory function), DNA remodeling (bending and wrapping), UTP-dependent reiterative transcription initiation, and stringent control by the alarmone ppGpp. At the enzyme level, CPSase activity is tightly controlled by allosteric effectors originating from different pathways: an inhibitor (UMP) and two activators (ornithine and IMP) that antagonize the inhibitory effect of UMP. Furthermore, it is worth noticing that all reaction intermediates in the production of CP are extremely reactive and unstable, and protected by tunneling through a 96 Å long internal channel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Charlier
- Research Group of Microbiology, Department of Bio-engineering Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Phu Nguyen Le Minh
- Research Group of Microbiology, Department of Bio-engineering Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Martine Roovers
- LABIRIS Institut de Recherches, Av. Emile Gryson 1, 1070, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jha RK, Tare P, Nagaraja V. Regulation of the gyr operon of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by overlapping promoters, DNA topology, and reiterative transcription. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2018; 501:877-884. [PMID: 29775608 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.05.067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2018] [Accepted: 05/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
DNA gyrase introduces negative supercoils into DNA to maintain topological homeostasis. The genes encoding gyrase, gyrB and gyrA, form a dicistronic operon in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) and other actinobacteria. Earlier work indicated that DNA relaxation stimulates the expression of the gyr genes, a phenomenon termed relaxation-stimulated transcription (RST). The present study addresses the underlying mechanism of gyr operon regulation. The operon is regulated by overlapping and divergently oriented promoters located upstream of gyrB. The principal promoter, PgyrB1, drives transcription of the operon, while a weak "reverse" promoter, PgyrR, transcribes in opposite direction. We demonstrate that PgyrR plays a role in fine tuning gyr gene expression by reiterative transcription (RT), a regulatory mechanism hitherto not found in Mtb. In vitro transcription assays showed that RT at PgyrR depended on the negatively supercoiled state of the DNA template. The principal promoter, PgyrB1, was also sensitive to DNA supercoiling, but it was stimulated by DNA relaxation. Moreover, RNA polymerase binding to the promoter was efficient at PgyrB1 when template DNA was relaxed, whereas binding to PgyrR was preferred when DNA was supercoiled. Thus, a collaboration between RST and RT governs the regulation of the gyr operon; the differing sensitivity of the two overlapping promoters to superhelix density explains how gyrase expression responds to changes in supercoiling to determine the efficiency of transcription initiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajiv Kumar Jha
- Department of Microbiology and Cell Biology, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, 560012, India
| | - Priyanka Tare
- Department of Microbiology and Cell Biology, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, 560012, India
| | - Valakunja Nagaraja
- Department of Microbiology and Cell Biology, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, 560012, India; Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Bangalore, 560064, India.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
X-ray crystal structure of a reiterative transcription complex reveals an atypical RNA extension pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017; 114:8211-8216. [PMID: 28652344 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1702741114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Reiterative transcription is a noncanonical form of RNA synthesis in which a nucleotide specified by a single base in the DNA template is repetitively added to the nascent transcript. Here we determined the crystal structure of an RNA polymerase, the bacterial enzyme from Thermus thermophilus, engaged in reiterative transcription during transcription initiation at a promoter resembling the pyrG promoter of Bacillus subtilis The structure reveals that the reiterative transcript detours from the dedicated RNA exit channel and extends toward the main channel of the enzyme, thereby allowing RNA extension without displacement of the promoter recognition σ-factor. Nascent transcripts containing reiteratively added G residues are eventually extended by nonreiterative transcription, revealing an atypical pathway for the formation of a transcription elongation complex.
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
We review literature on the metabolism of ribo- and deoxyribonucleotides, nucleosides, and nucleobases in Escherichia coli and Salmonella,including biosynthesis, degradation, interconversion, and transport. Emphasis is placed on enzymology and regulation of the pathways, at both the level of gene expression and the control of enzyme activity. The paper begins with an overview of the reactions that form and break the N-glycosyl bond, which binds the nucleobase to the ribosyl moiety in nucleotides and nucleosides, and the enzymes involved in the interconversion of the different phosphorylated states of the nucleotides. Next, the de novo pathways for purine and pyrimidine nucleotide biosynthesis are discussed in detail.Finally, the conversion of nucleosides and nucleobases to nucleotides, i.e.,the salvage reactions, are described. The formation of deoxyribonucleotides is discussed, with emphasis on ribonucleotidereductase and pathways involved in fomation of dUMP. At the end, we discuss transport systems for nucleosides and nucleobases and also pathways for breakdown of the nucleobases.
Collapse
|
8
|
Rosinski-Chupin I, Sauvage E, Sismeiro O, Villain A, Da Cunha V, Caliot ME, Dillies MA, Trieu-Cuot P, Bouloc P, Lartigue MF, Glaser P. Single nucleotide resolution RNA-seq uncovers new regulatory mechanisms in the opportunistic pathogen Streptococcus agalactiae. BMC Genomics 2015; 16:419. [PMID: 26024923 PMCID: PMC4448216 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-015-1583-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2015] [Accepted: 04/27/2015] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Streptococcus agalactiae, or Group B Streptococcus, is a leading cause of neonatal infections and an increasing cause of infections in adults with underlying diseases. In an effort to reconstruct the transcriptional networks involved in S. agalactiae physiology and pathogenesis, we performed an extensive and robust characterization of its transcriptome through a combination of differential RNA-sequencing in eight different growth conditions or genetic backgrounds and strand-specific RNA-sequencing. Results Our study identified 1,210 transcription start sites (TSSs) and 655 transcript ends as well as 39 riboswitches and cis-regulatory regions, 39 cis-antisense non-coding RNAs and 47 small RNAs potentially acting in trans. Among these putative regulatory RNAs, ten were differentially expressed in response to an acid stress and two riboswitches sensed directly or indirectly the pH modification. Strikingly, 15% of the TSSs identified were associated with the incorporation of pseudo-templated nucleotides, showing that reiterative transcription is a pervasive process in S. agalactiae. In particular, 40% of the TSSs upstream genes involved in nucleotide metabolism show reiterative transcription potentially regulating gene expression, as exemplified for pyrG and thyA encoding the CTP synthase and the thymidylate synthase respectively. Conclusions This comprehensive map of the transcriptome at the single nucleotide resolution led to the discovery of new regulatory mechanisms in S. agalactiae. It also provides the basis for in depth analyses of transcriptional networks in S. agalactiae and of the regulatory role of reiterative transcription following variations of intra-cellular nucleotide pools. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-015-1583-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle Rosinski-Chupin
- Institut Pasteur, Unité de Biologie des Bactéries Pathogènes à Gram Positif, 28 rue du Docteur Roux, 75724,, Paris Cedex 15, France. .,CNRS UMR 3525, Paris, France.
| | - Elisabeth Sauvage
- Institut Pasteur, Unité de Biologie des Bactéries Pathogènes à Gram Positif, 28 rue du Docteur Roux, 75724,, Paris Cedex 15, France. .,CNRS UMR 3525, Paris, France.
| | - Odile Sismeiro
- Institut Pasteur, Transcriptome and Epigenome Platform, 28 rue du Docteur Roux, 75724,, Paris Cedex 15, France.
| | - Adrien Villain
- Institut Pasteur, Unité de Biologie des Bactéries Pathogènes à Gram Positif, 28 rue du Docteur Roux, 75724,, Paris Cedex 15, France. .,CNRS UMR 3525, Paris, France.
| | - Violette Da Cunha
- Institut Pasteur, Unité de Biologie des Bactéries Pathogènes à Gram Positif, 28 rue du Docteur Roux, 75724,, Paris Cedex 15, France. .,CNRS UMR 3525, Paris, France.
| | - Marie-Elise Caliot
- Institut Pasteur, Unité de Biologie des Bactéries Pathogènes à Gram Positif, 28 rue du Docteur Roux, 75724,, Paris Cedex 15, France.
| | - Marie-Agnès Dillies
- Institut Pasteur, Transcriptome and Epigenome Platform, 28 rue du Docteur Roux, 75724,, Paris Cedex 15, France.
| | - Patrick Trieu-Cuot
- Institut Pasteur, Unité de Biologie des Bactéries Pathogènes à Gram Positif, 28 rue du Docteur Roux, 75724,, Paris Cedex 15, France.
| | - Philippe Bouloc
- Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), CEA, CNRS, Université Paris-Sud, bâtiment 400, 91405, Orsay, France.
| | - Marie-Frédérique Lartigue
- Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), CEA, CNRS, Université Paris-Sud, bâtiment 400, 91405, Orsay, France. .,Université de Tours, UMR1282 Infectiologie et Santé Publique, F-37000, Tours, France. .,CHRU de Tours, F-37044, Tours, France. .,INRA, UMR1282 Infectiologie et Santé Publique, F-37380, Nouzilly, France.
| | - Philippe Glaser
- Institut Pasteur, Unité de Biologie des Bactéries Pathogènes à Gram Positif, 28 rue du Docteur Roux, 75724,, Paris Cedex 15, France. .,CNRS UMR 3525, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Transcription start site sequence and spacing between the -10 region and the start site affect reiterative transcription-mediated regulation of gene expression in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 2014; 196:2912-20. [PMID: 24891446 DOI: 10.1128/jb.01753-14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Reiterative transcription is a reaction catalyzed by RNA polymerase, in which nucleotides are repetitively added to the 3' end of a nascent transcript due to upstream slippage of the transcript without movement of the DNA template. In Escherichia coli, the expression of several operons is regulated through mechanisms in which high intracellular levels of UTP promote reiterative transcription that adds extra U residues to the 3' end of a nascent transcript during transcription initiation. Immediately following the addition of one or more extra U residues, the nascent transcripts are released from the transcription initiation complex, thereby reducing the level of gene expression. Therefore, gene expression can be regulated by internal UTP levels, which reflect the availability of external pyrimidine sources. The magnitude of gene regulation by these mechanisms varies considerably, even when control mechanisms are analogous. These variations apparently are due to differences in promoter sequences. One of the operons regulated (in part) by UTP-sensitive reiterative transcription in E. coli is the carAB operon, which encodes the first enzyme in the pyrimidine nucleotide biosynthetic pathway. In this study, we used the carAB operon to examine the effects of nucleotide sequence at and near the transcription start site and spacing between the start site and -10 region of the promoter on reiterative transcription and gene regulation. Our results indicate that these variables are important determinants in establishing the extent of reiterative transcription, levels of productive transcription, and range of gene regulation.
Collapse
|
10
|
Turnbough CL. Regulation of gene expression by reiterative transcription. Curr Opin Microbiol 2011; 14:142-7. [PMID: 21334966 DOI: 10.1016/j.mib.2011.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2010] [Accepted: 01/28/2011] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Gene regulation involves many different types of transcription control mechanisms, including mechanisms based on reiterative transcription in which nucleotides are repetitively added to the 3' end of a nascent transcript due to upstream transcript slippage. In these mechanisms, reiterative transcription is typically modulated by interactions between RNA polymerase and its nucleoside triphosphate substrates without the involvement of regulatory proteins. This review describes the current state of knowledge of gene regulation involving reiterative transcription. It focuses on the methods by which reiterative transcription is controlled and emphasizes the different fates of transcripts produced by this reaction. The review also includes a discussion of possible new and fundamentally different mechanisms of gene regulation that rely on conditional reiterative transcription.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles L Turnbough
- Department of Microbiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294-2170, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Regulation of pyrimidine biosynthetic gene expression in bacteria: repression without repressors. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2008; 72:266-300, table of contents. [PMID: 18535147 DOI: 10.1128/mmbr.00001-08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 148] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
SUMMARY DNA-binding repressor proteins that govern transcription initiation in response to end products generally regulate bacterial biosynthetic genes, but this is rarely true for the pyrimidine biosynthetic (pyr) genes. Instead, bacterial pyr gene regulation generally involves mechanisms that rely only on regulatory sequences embedded in the leader region of the operon, which cause premature transcription termination or translation inhibition in response to nucleotide signals. Studies with Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis pyr genes reveal a variety of regulatory mechanisms. Transcription attenuation via UTP-sensitive coupled transcription and translation regulates expression of the pyrBI and pyrE operons in enteric bacteria, whereas nucleotide effects on binding of the PyrR protein to pyr mRNA attenuation sites control pyr operon expression in most gram-positive bacteria. Nucleotide-sensitive reiterative transcription underlies regulation of other pyr genes. With the E. coli pyrBI, carAB, codBA, and upp-uraA operons, UTP-sensitive reiterative transcription within the initially transcribed region (ITR) leads to nonproductive transcription initiation. CTP-sensitive reiterative transcription in the pyrG ITRs of gram-positive bacteria, which involves the addition of G residues, results in the formation of an antiterminator RNA hairpin and suppression of transcription attenuation. Some mechanisms involve regulation of translation rather than transcription. Expression of the pyrC and pyrD operons of enteric bacteria is controlled by nucleotide-sensitive transcription start switching that produces transcripts with different potentials for translation. In Mycobacterium smegmatis and other bacteria, PyrR modulates translation of pyr genes by binding to their ribosome binding site. Evidence supporting these conclusions, generalizations for other bacteria, and prospects for future research are presented.
Collapse
|
12
|
Rapoport AE, Trifonov EN. Excessive clustering of third codon position pyrimidines in prokaryotes. J Biomol Struct Dyn 2008; 25:647-53. [PMID: 18399698 DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2008.10507211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
The third codon positions are generally thought to be largely neutral, allowing for synonymous mutations. To see how much the third positions are loaded in general we analyzed the sequences of the nucleotides in the third positions. Simple word count analysis revealed excessive clustering of pyrimidines in the third position sequences of prokaryotic mRNA. The clusters have a clear tendency to follow one after another at characteristic distance of 25-30 triplets. Thus, the third codon positions do carry a rather strong message. Possible connection with loop-fold structure of proteins and (cotranslational) protein folding is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra E Rapoport
- Genome Diversity Center, Institute of Evolution, University of Haifa, Haifa 31905, Israel.
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cameron AD, Volar M, Bannister LA, Redfield RJ. RNA secondary structure regulates the translation of sxy and competence development in Haemophilus influenzae. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36:10-20. [PMID: 17981840 PMCID: PMC2248739 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkm915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2007] [Revised: 10/04/2007] [Accepted: 10/07/2007] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The sxy (tfoX) gene product is the central regulator of DNA uptake by naturally competent gamma-proteobacteria such as Haemophilus influenzae, Vibrio cholerae and probably Escherichia coli. However, the mechanisms regulating sxy gene expression are not understood despite being key to understanding the physiological role of DNA uptake. We have isolated mutations in H. influenzae sxy that greatly elevate translation and thus cause competence to develop in otherwise non-inducing conditions (hypercompetence). In vitro nuclease analysis confirmed the existence of an extensive secondary structure at the 5' end of sxy mRNA that sequesters the ribosome-binding site and start codon in a stem-loop. All of the hypercompetence mutations reduced mRNA base pairing, and one was shown to cause a global destabilization that increased translational efficiency. Conversely, mutations engineered to add mRNA base pairs strengthened the secondary structure, resulting in reduced translational efficiency and greatly reduced competence for genetic transformation. Transfer of wild-type cells to starvation medium improved translational efficiency of sxy while independently triggering the sugar starvation regulator (CRP) to stimulate transcription at the sxy promoter. Thus, mRNA secondary structure is responsive to conditions where DNA uptake will be favorable, and transcription of sxy is simultaneously enhanced if CRP activation signals that energy supplies are limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew D.S. Cameron
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology and Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Milica Volar
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology and Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Laura A. Bannister
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology and Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Rosemary J. Redfield
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology and Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Elsholz AKW, Jørgensen CM, Switzer RL. The number of G residues in the Bacillus subtilis pyrG initially transcribed region governs reiterative transcription-mediated regulation. J Bacteriol 2006; 189:2176-80. [PMID: 17158658 PMCID: PMC1855758 DOI: 10.1128/jb.01611-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Derepression of pyrG expression in Bacillus subtilis involves CTP-sensitive reiterative transcription, which introduces up to 11 extra G residues at the 5' ends of pyrG transcripts. Insertion of three or more additional Gs at the 5' end of the pyrG initially transcribed region abolished reiterative transcription and caused constitutive expression.
Collapse
|
15
|
Hook-Barnard I, Johnson XB, Hinton DM. Escherichia coli RNA polymerase recognition of a sigma70-dependent promoter requiring a -35 DNA element and an extended -10 TGn motif. J Bacteriol 2006; 188:8352-9. [PMID: 17012380 PMCID: PMC1698240 DOI: 10.1128/jb.00853-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2006] [Accepted: 09/25/2006] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Escherichia coli sigma70-dependent promoters have typically been characterized as either -10/-35 promoters, which have good matches to both the canonical -10 and the -35 sequences or as extended -10 promoters (TGn/-10 promoters), which have the TGn motif and an excellent match to the -10 consensus sequence. We report here an investigation of a promoter, P(minor), that has a nearly perfect match to the -35 sequence and has the TGn motif. However, P(minor) contains an extremely poor sigma70 -10 element. We demonstrate that P(minor) is active both in vivo and in vitro and that mutations in either the -35 or the TGn motif eliminate its activity. Mutation of the TGn motif can be compensated for by mutations that make the -10 element more canonical, thus converting the -35/TGn promoter to a -35/-10 promoter. Potassium permanganate footprinting on the nontemplate and template strands indicates that when polymerase is in a stable (open) complex with P(minor), the DNA is single stranded from positions -11 to +4. We also demonstrate that transcription from P(minor) incorporates nontemplated ribonucleoside triphosphates at the 5' end of the P(minor) transcript, which results in an anomalous assignment for the start site when primer extension analysis is used. P(minor) represents one of the few -35/TGn promoters that have been characterized and serves as a model for investigating functional differences between these promoters and the better-characterized -10/-35 and extended -10 promoters used by E. coli RNA polymerase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- India Hook-Barnard
- Gene Expression and Regulation Section, Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bldg. 8, Room 2A-13, Bethesda, MD 20892-0830, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Withey JH, Dirita VJ. Vibrio cholerae ToxT independently activates the divergently transcribed aldA and tagA genes. J Bacteriol 2005; 187:7890-900. [PMID: 16291662 PMCID: PMC1291258 DOI: 10.1128/jb.187.23.7890-7900.2005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The Vibrio cholerae ToxT regulon includes the genes encoding cholera toxin (CT) and the toxin-coregulated pilus (TCP), which are the major virulence factors required for causing cholera disease and colonizing the upper small intestine of the host, respectively. The genes encoding CT, ctxAB, and the genes encoding the components of the TCP, tcpA to tcpJ, are organized within operons, upstream of which are DNA binding sites for the transcriptional activator ToxT. ToxT is a member of the large AraC/XylS family of transcriptional regulators and also activates transcription of five other genes whose roles in V. cholerae pathogenesis, if any, are poorly understood. acfA and acfD are divergently transcribed genes required for efficient colonization of the intestine. Transcriptional activation of acfA and acfD requires a pair of central ToxT binding sites in an inverted-repeat configuration for ToxT-directed transcription of both genes. tcpI has an unknown role in pathogenesis. aldA and tagA are divergently transcribed genes that also have unknown roles in pathogenesis. In this study, we map the aldA and tagA promoters and identify the ToxT binding sites upstream of each gene. Our results suggest that two ToxT binding sites in an inverted-repeat configuration are required for ToxT-directed transcription of tagA and that a single ToxT binding site is required for ToxT-directed transcription of aldA. Furthermore, to direct transcription of tagA and aldA, ToxT uses independent binding regions upstream of each gene, in contrast to what we previously found for the divergently transcribed acfA and acfD genes, which share ToxT binding sites between the two genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey H Withey
- Unit for Laboratory Animal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, 48109-0614, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Semenova E, Minakhin L, Bogdanova E, Nagornykh M, Vasilov A, Heyduk T, Solonin A, Zakharova M, Severinov K. Transcription regulation of the EcoRV restriction-modification system. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33:6942-51. [PMID: 16332697 PMCID: PMC1310966 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gki998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
When a plasmid containing restriction–modification (R–M) genes enters a naïve host, unmodified host DNA can be destroyed by restriction endonuclease. Therefore, expression of R–M genes must be regulated to ensure that enough methyltransferase is produced and that host DNA is methylated before the endonuclease synthesis begins. In several R–M systems, specialized Control (C) proteins coordinate expression of the R and the M genes. C proteins bind to DNA sequences called C-boxes and activate expression of their cognate R genes and inhibit the M gene expression, however the mechanisms remain undefined. Here, we studied the regulation of gene expression in the C protein-dependent EcoRV system. We map the divergent EcoRV M and R gene promoters and we define the site of C protein-binding that is sufficient for activation of the EcoRV R transcription.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ekaterina Semenova
- Waksman Institute for Microbiology, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mosrin-Huaman C, Turnbough CL, Rahmouni AR. Translocation of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase against a protein roadblock in vivo highlights a passive sliding mechanism for transcript elongation. Mol Microbiol 2004; 51:1471-81. [PMID: 14982639 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2003.03926.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Current models for transcription elongation infer that RNA polymerase (RNAP) moves along the template by a passive sliding mechanism that takes advantage of random lateral oscillations in which single basepair sliding movements interconvert the elongation complex between pre- and post-translocated states. Such passive translocational equilibrium was tested in vivo by a systematic change in the templated NTP that is to be incorporated by RNAP, which is temporarily roadblocked by the lac repressor. Our results show that, under these conditions that hinder the forward movement of the polymerase, the elongation complex is able to extend its RNA chain one nucleotide further when the incoming NTP is a kinetically favoured substrate (i.e. low K(m)). The addition of an extra nucleotide destabilizes the repressor-operator roadblock leading to an increase in transcriptional readthrough. Similar results are obtained when the incoming NTPs are less kinetically favoured substrates (i.e. high K(m)s) by specifically increasing their intracellular concentrations. Altogether, these in vivo data are consistent with a passive sliding model in which RNAP forward translocation is favoured by NTP binding. They also suggest that fluctuations in the intracellular NTP pools may play a key role in gene regulation at the transcript elongation level.
Collapse
|
19
|
Meng Q, Turnbough CL, Switzer RL. Attenuation control of pyrG expression in Bacillus subtilis is mediated by CTP-sensitive reiterative transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101:10943-8. [PMID: 15252202 PMCID: PMC503723 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0403755101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
In Bacillus subtilis and other Gram-positive bacteria, pyrimidine-mediated regulation of the pyrG gene, which encodes CTP synthetase, occurs through an attenuation mechanism involving an intrinsic transcription terminator in the pyrG leader region. Low intracellular levels of CTP prevent termination at the attenuator by a mechanism that requires the nontemplate strand sequence GGGC at the pyrG transcription initiation site (first G =+1) and the leader transcript sequence GCUCCC located at the 5' end of the terminator RNA hairpin. In this study, we demonstrate that reiterative transcription adds G residues (up to at least 10) to the 5' end of pyrG transcripts when B. subtilis cells are starved for pyrimidines but not when cells are grown with excess cytidine. Regulated repetitive addition of G residues, as well as pyrimidine-mediated pyrG regulation, requires the sequence GGGC or GGGT at the start of pyrG transcription. Mutational insertion of four extra G residues at the 5' end of the pyrG transcript (i.e., 5'-GGGGGGGC) results in constitutive pyrG expression. We propose that the incorporation of extra G residues by reiterative transcription at the wild-type promoter occurs when normal transcription elongation is stalled at position +4 by low levels of the incoming substrate, CTP, during pyrimidine limitation. The poly(G) extensions on the 5' ends of pyrG transcripts act to prevent transcription attenuation by base pairing with the sequence CUCCCUUUC located in the 5' strand of the terminator hairpin. This control mechanism is likely to operate in other Gram-positive bacteria containing similar pyrG leader sequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi Meng
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 61801, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Caporale LH. Natural selection and the emergence of a mutation phenotype: an update of the evolutionary synthesis considering mechanisms that affect genome variation. Annu Rev Microbiol 2004; 57:467-85. [PMID: 14527288 DOI: 10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.090855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Most descriptions of evolution assume that all mutations are completely random with respect to their potential effects on survival. However, much like other phenotypic variations that affect the survival of the descendants, intrinsic variations in the probability, type, and location of genetic change can feel the pressure of natural selection. From site-specific recombination to changes in polymerase fidelity and repair of DNA damage, an organism's gene products affect what genetic changes occur in its genome. Through the action of natural selection on these gene products, potentially favorable mutations can become more probable than random. With examples from variation in bacterial surface proteins to the vertebrate immune response, it is clear that a great deal of genetic change is better than "random" with respect to its potential effect on survival. Indeed, some potentially useful mutations are so probable that they can be viewed as being encoded implicitly in the genome. An updated evolutionary theory includes emergence, under selective pressure, of genomic information that affects the probability of different classes of mutation, with consequences for genome survival.
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
Promoter escape is the last stage of transcription initiation when RNA polymerase, having initiated de novo phosphodiester bond synthesis, must begin to relinquish its hold on promoter DNA and advance to downstream regions (DSRs) of the template. In vitro, this process is marked by the release of high levels of abortive transcripts at most promoters, reflecting the high instability of initial transcribing complexes (ITCs) and indicative of the existence of barriers to the escape process. The high abortive initiation level is the result of the existence of unproductive ITCs that carry out repeated initiation and abortive release without escaping the promoter. The formation of unproductive ITCs is a widespread phenomenon, but it occurs to different extent on different promoters. Quantitative analysis of promoter mutations suggests that the extent and pattern of abortive initiation and promoter escape is determined by the sequence of promoter elements, both in the promoter recognition region (PRR) and the initial transcribed sequence (ITS). A general correlation has been found that the stronger the promoter DNA-polymerase interaction, the poorer the ability of RNA polymerase to escape the promoter. In gene regulation, promoter escape can be the rate-limiting step for transcription initiation. An increasing number of regulatory proteins are known to exert their control at this step. Examples are discussed with an emphasis on the diverse mechanisms involved. At the molecular level, the X-ray crystal structures of RNA polymerase and its various transcription complexes provide the framework for understanding the functional data on abortive initiation and promoter escape. Based on structural and biochemical evidence, a mechanism for abortive initiation and promoter escape is described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lilian M Hsu
- Program in Biochemistry, Mount Holyoke College, South Hadley, MA 01075, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Barker MM, Gourse RL. Regulation of rRNA transcription correlates with nucleoside triphosphate sensing. J Bacteriol 2001; 183:6315-23. [PMID: 11591676 PMCID: PMC100125 DOI: 10.1128/jb.183.21.6315-6323.2001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
We have previously shown that the activity of the Escherichia coli rRNA promoter rrnB P1 in vitro depends on the concentration of the initiating nucleotide, ATP, and can respond to changes in ATP pools in vivo. We have proposed that this nucleoside triphosphate (NTP) sensing might contribute to regulation of rRNA transcription. To test this model, we have measured the ATP requirements for transcription from 11 different rrnB P1 core promoter mutants in vitro and compared them with the regulatory responses of the same promoters in vivo. The seven rrnB P1 variants that required much lower ATP concentrations than the wild-type promoter for efficient transcription in vitro were defective for response to growth rate changes in vivo (growth rate-dependent regulation). In contrast, the four variants requiring high ATP concentrations in vitro (like the wild-type promoter) were regulated with the growth rate in vivo. We also observed a correlation between NTP sensing in vitro and the response of the promoters in vivo to deletion of the fis gene (an example of homeostatic control), although this relationship was not as tight as for growth rate-dependent regulation. We conclude that the kinetic features responsible for the high ATP concentration dependence of the rrnB P1 promoter in vitro are responsible, at least in part, for the promoter's regulation in vivo, consistent with the model in which rrnB P1 promoter activity can be regulated by changes in NTP pools in vivo (or by hypothetical factors that work at the same kinetic steps that make the promoter sensitive to NTPs).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M M Barker
- Department of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|