Amphotropic murine leukemia virus entry is determined by specific combinations of residues from receptor loops 2 and 4

Residues 28 to 39 of the Extracellular Loop 1 of Chicken Na+/H+ Exchanger Type I Mediate Cell Binding and Entry of Subgroup J Avian Leukosis Virus

Chicken Na⁺/H⁺ exchanger type I (chNHE1), a multispan transmembrane protein, is a cellular receptor of the subgroup J avian leukosis virus (ALV-J). To identify the functional determinants of chNHE1 responsible for the ALV-J receptor activity, a series of chimeric receptors was created by exchanging the extracellular loops (ECL) of human NHE1 (huNHE1) and chNHE1 and by ECL replacement with a hemagglutinin (HA) tag. These chimeric receptors then were used in binding and entry assays to map the minimal ALV-J gp85-binding domain of chNHE1. We show that ECL1 of chNHE1 (chECL1) is the critical functional ECL that interacts directly with ALV-J gp85; ECL3 is also involved in ALV-J gp85 binding. Amino acid residues 28 to 39 of the N-terminal membrane-proximal region of chECL1 constitute the minimal domain required for chNHE1 binding of ALV-J gp85. These residues are sufficient to mediate viral entry into ALV-J nonpermissive cells. Point mutation analysis revealed that A30, V33, W38, and E39 of chECL1 are the key residues mediating the binding between chNHE1 and ALV-J gp85. Further, the replacement of residues 28 to 39 of huNHE1 with the corresponding chNHE1 residues converted the nonfunctional ALV-J receptor huNHE1 to a functional one. Importantly, soluble chECL1 and huECL1 harboring chNHE1 residues 28 to 39 both could effectively block ALV-J infection. Collectively, our findings indicate that residues 28 to 39 of chNHE1 constitute a domain that is critical for receptor function and mediate ALV-J entry.IMPORTANCE chNHE1 is a cellular receptor of ALV-J, a retrovirus that causes infections in chickens and serious economic losses in the poultry industry. Until now, the domains determining the chNHE1 receptor function remained unknown. We demonstrate that chECL1 is critical for receptor function, with residues 28 to 39 constituting the minimal functional domain responsible for chNHE1 binding of ALV-J gp85 and efficiently mediating ALV-J cell entry. These residues are located in the membrane-proximal region of the N terminus of chECL1, suggesting that the binding site of ALV-J gp85 on chNHE1 is probably located on the apex of the molecule; the receptor-binding mode might be different from that of retroviruses. We also found that soluble chECL1, as well as huECL1 harboring chNHE1 residues 28 to 39, effectively blocked ALV-J infection. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the ALV-J infection mechanism and also provide new insights into the control strategies for ALV-J infection.

Mapping of the minimal inorganic phosphate transporting unit of human PiT2 suggests a structure universal to PiT-related proteins from all kingdoms of life

BACKGROUND

The inorganic (Pi) phosphate transporter (PiT) family comprises known and putative Na(+)- or H(+)-dependent Pi-transporting proteins with representatives from all kingdoms. The mammalian members are placed in the outer cell membranes and suggested to supply cells with Pi to maintain house-keeping functions. Alignment of protein sequences representing PiT family members from all kingdoms reveals the presence of conserved amino acids and that bacterial phosphate permeases and putative phosphate permeases from archaea lack substantial parts of the protein sequence when compared to the mammalian PiT family members. Besides being Na(+)-dependent P(i) (NaP(i)) transporters, the mammalian PiT paralogs, PiT1 and PiT2, also are receptors for gamma-retroviruses. We have here exploited the dual-function of PiT1 and PiT2 to study the structure-function relationship of PiT proteins.

RESULTS

We show that the human PiT2 histidine, H(502), and the human PiT1 glutamate, E(70),--both conserved in eukaryotic PiT family members--are critical for P(i) transport function. Noticeably, human PiT2 H(502) is located in the C-terminal PiT family signature sequence, and human PiT1 E(70) is located in ProDom domains characteristic for all PiT family members.A human PiT2 truncation mutant, which consists of the predicted 10 transmembrane (TM) domain backbone without a large intracellular domain (human PiT2ΔR(254)-V(483)), was found to be a fully functional P(i) transporter. Further truncation of the human PiT2 protein by additional removal of two predicted TM domains together with the large intracellular domain created a mutant that resembles a bacterial phosphate permease and an archaeal putative phosphate permease. This human PiT2 truncation mutant (human PiT2ΔL(183)-V(483)) did also support P(i) transport albeit at very low levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that the overall structure of the P(i)-transporting unit of the PiT family proteins has remained unchanged during evolution. Moreover, in combination, our studies of the gene structure of the human PiT1 and PiT2 genes (SLC20A1 and SLC20A2, respectively) and alignment of protein sequences of PiT family members from all kingdoms, along with the studies of the dual functions of the human PiT paralogs show that these proteins are excellent as models for studying the evolution of a protein's structure-function relationship.

Identification of two distinct structural regions in a human porcine endogenous retrovirus receptor, HuPAR2, contributing to function for viral entry

BACKGROUND

Of the three subclasses of Porcine Endogenous Retrovirus (PERV), PERV-A is able to infect human cells via one of two receptors, HuPAR1 or HuPAR2. Characterizing the structure-function relationships of the two HuPAR receptors in PERV-A binding and entry is important in understanding receptor-mediated gammaretroviral entry and contributes to evaluating the risk of zoonosis in xenotransplantation.

RESULTS

Chimeras of the non-permissive murine PAR and the permissive HuPAR2, which scanned the entire molecule, revealed that the first 135 amino acids of HuPAR2 are critical for PERV-A entry. Within this critical region, eighteen single residue differences exist. Site-directed mutagenesis used to map single residues confirmed the previously identified L109 as a binding and infectivity determinant. In addition, we identified seven residues contributing to the efficiency of PERV-A entry without affecting envelope binding, located in multiple predicted structural motifs (intracellular, extracellular and transmembrane). We also show that expression of HuPAR2 in a non-permissive cell line results in an average 11-fold higher infectivity titer for PERV-A compared to equal expression of HuPAR1, although PERV-A envelope binding is similar. Chimeras between HuPAR-1 and -2 revealed that the region spanning amino acids 152-285 is responsible for the increase of HuPAR2. Fine mapping of this region revealed that the increased receptor function required the full sequence rather than one or more specific residues.

CONCLUSION

HuPAR2 has two distinct structural regions. In one region, a single residue determines binding; however, in both regions, multiple residues influence receptor function for PERV-A entry.

Mapping of equine lentivirus receptor 1 residues critical for equine infectious anemia virus envelope binding

The equine lentivirus receptor 1 (ELR1), a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) protein family, has been identified as a functional receptor for equine infectious anemia virus (EIAV). Toward defining the functional interactions between the EIAV SU protein (gp90) and its ELR1 receptor, we mapped the gp90 binding domain of ELR1 by a combination of binding and functional assays using the EIAV SU gp90 protein and various chimeric receptor proteins derived from exchanges between the functional ELR1 and the nonbinding homolog, mouse herpesvirus entry mediator (murine HveA). Complementary exchanges of the respective cysteine-rich domains (CRD) between the ELR1 and murine HveA proteins revealed CRD1 as the predominant determinant of functional gp90 binding to ELR1 and also to a chimeric murine HveA protein expressed on the surface of transfected Cf2Th cells. Mutations of individual amino acids in the CRD1 segment of ELR1 and murine HveA indicated the Leu70 in CRD1 as essential for functional binding of EIAV gp90 and for virus infection of transduced Cf2Th cells. The specificity of the EIAV SU binding domain identified for the ELR1 receptor is fundamentally identical to that reported previously for functional binding of feline immunodeficiency virus SU to its coreceptor CD134, another TNFR protein. These results indicate unexpected common features of the specific mechanisms by which diverse lentiviruses can employ TNFR proteins as functional receptors.

Use of different but overlapping determinants in a retrovirus receptor accounts for non-reciprocal interference between xenotropic and polytropic murine leukemia viruses

Background

Retrovirus infection depends on binding of the retroviral envelope (Env) protein to specific cell-surface protein receptors. Interference, or superinfection resistance, is a frequent consequence of retroviral infection, and occurs when newly-synthesized Env binds to receptor proteins resulting in a block to entry by retroviruses that use the same receptors. Three groups of viruses demonstrate a non-reciprocal pattern of interference (NRI), which requires the existence of both a common receptor utilized by all viruses within the group, and a specific receptor that is used by a subset of viruses. In the case of amphotropic and 10A1 murine leukemia viruses (MLV), the common and specific receptors are the products of two related genes. In the case of avian sarcoma and leukosis virus types B, D, and E, the two receptors are distinct protein products of a single gene. NRI also occurs between xenotropic and polytropic MLV. The common receptor, Xpr1, has been identified, but a specific receptor has yet to be described.

Results

Using chimeric receptor proteins and interference studies, we have identified a region of Xpr1 that is uniquely utilized by xenotropic MLV and show that this receptor domain is required for non-reciprocal interference.

Conclusion

We propose a novel pattern of receptor usage by xenotropic and polytropic MLV to explain the NRI observed between these viruses. We propose that the specific and common receptor determinants for xenotropic and polytropic viruses are simultaneously present in discreet domains of a single Xpr1 protein.

Evolutionary and experimental analyses of inorganic phosphate transporter PiT family reveals two related signature sequences harboring highly conserved aspartic acids critical for sodium-dependent phosphate transport function of human PiT2

The mammalian members of the inorganic phosphate (P(i)) transporter (PiT) family, the type III sodium-dependent phosphate (NaP(i)) transporters PiT1 and PiT2, have been assigned housekeeping P(i) transport functions and are suggested to be involved in chondroblastic and osteoblastic mineralization and ectopic calcification. The PiT family members are conserved throughout all kingdoms and use either sodium (Na+) or proton (H+) gradients to transport P(i). Sequence logo analyses revealed that independent of their cation dependency these proteins harbor conserved signature sequences in their N- and C-terminal ends with the common core consensus sequence GANDVANA. With the exception of 10 proteins from extremophiles all 109 proteins analyzed carry an aspartic acid in one or both of the signature sequences. We changed either of the highly conserved aspartates, Asp28 and Asp506, in the N- and C-terminal signature sequences, respectively, of human PiT2 to asparagine and analyzed P(i) uptake function in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Both mutant proteins were expressed at the cell surface of the oocytes but exhibited knocked out NaP(i) transport function. Human PiT2 is also a retroviral receptor and we have previously shown that this function can be exploited as a control for proper processing and folding of mutant proteins. Both mutant transporters displayed wild-type receptor functions implying that their overall architecture is undisturbed. Thus the presence of an aspartic acid in either of the PiT family signature sequences is critical for the Na+-dependent P(i) transport function of human PiT2. The conservation of the aspartates among proteins using either Na+- or H+-gradients for P(i) transport suggests that they are involved in H+-dependent P(i) transport as well. Current results favor a membrane topology model in which the N- and C-terminal PiT family signature sequences are positioned in intra- and extracellular loops, respectively, suggesting that they are involved in related functions on either side of the membrane. The present data are in agreement with a possible role of the signature sequences in translocation of cations.

The central half of Pit2 is not required for its function as a retroviral receptor

The type III sodium-dependent phosphate (NaPi) cotransporter, Pit2, is a receptor for amphotropic murine leukemia virus (A-MuLV) and 10A1 MuLV. In order to determine what is sufficient for Pit2 receptor function, a deletion mutant lacking about the middle half of the protein was made. The mutant supported entry for both viruses, unequivocally narrowing down the identification of the sequence that is sufficient to specify the receptor functions of Pit2 to its N-terminal 182 amino acids and C-terminal 170 amino acids.

Amino acid residues Tyr-67, Asn-72, and Asp-73 of the TVB receptor are important for subgroup E avian sarcoma and leukosis virus interaction

The chicken TVB(S1) protein serves as the cellular receptor for the cytopathic subgroups B and D avian sarcoma and leukosis viruses (ASLVs) as well as for the non-cytopathic subgroup E ASLV. Previous studies had mapped the subgroup B viral interaction determinants to a region that was located between residues 32 and 46 of TVB(S1) [J. Virol. 76 (2002) 5404]. To gain a greater insight into ASLV Env-receptor interactions and the possible role of these interactions in viral cytopathic effects, we employed a homolog-scanning mutagenesis approach to identify amino acid residues important for subgroup E viral receptor function by exchanging amino acid residues between TVB(S1) and its human homolog, DR5. These studies identified residues Tyr-67, Asn-72, and Asp-73 of TVB(S1) as important subgroup E viral interaction determinants. Intriguingly, these three residues are conserved between TVB(S1) and DR5, demonstrating that the human protein contains critical subgroup E viral interaction determinants, but in this context, they cannot support viral entry. These data confirm that the molecular determinants of the TVB receptor required for subgroup E viral entry are completely distinct from those used by subgroup B viruses.

Identification of an extracellular domain within the human PiT2 receptor that is required for amphotropic murine leukemia virus binding

Human PiT2 (PiT2) is a multiple-membrane-spanning protein that functions as a type III sodium phosphate cotransporter and as the receptor for amphotropic murine leukemia virus (A-MuLV). Human PiT1 (PiT1), another type III sodium phosphate cotransporter, is a highly related protein that functions as a receptor for gibbon ape leukemia virus but not for A-MuLV. The ability of PiT1 and PiT2 to function as discrete viral receptors with unique properties presumably is reflected in critical residue differences between these two proteins. Early efforts to map the region(s) within PiT2 that is important for virus binding and/or entry relied on infection results obtained with PiT1-PiT2 chimeric cDNAs expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHOK1) cells. These attempts to localize the PiT2 virus-binding site were hampered because they were based on infectivity, not binding, assays, and therefore, receptors that bound but failed to facilitate virus entry could not be distinguished from receptors that did not bind virus. Using a more accurate topological model for PiT2 as well as an A-MuLV receptor-binding assay, we have identified extracellular domain one (ECD1) of the human PiT2 receptor as being important for A-MuLV binding and infection.

Cell surface receptors for gammaretroviruses

Evidence obtained during the last few years has greatly extended our understanding of the cell surface receptors that mediate infections of retroviruses and has provided many surprising insights. In contrast to other cell surface components such as lectins or proteoglycans that influence infections indirectly by enhancing virus adsorption onto specific cells, the true receptors induce conformational changes in the viral envelope glycoproteins that are essential for infection. One surprise is that all of the cell surface receptors for gamma-retroviruses are proteins that have multiple transmembrane (TM) sequences, compatible with their identification in known instances as transporters for important solutes. In striking contrast, almost all other animal viruses use receptors that exclusively have single TM sequences, with the sole proven exception we know of being the coreceptors used by lentiviruses. This evidence strongly suggests that virus genera have been prevented because of their previous evolutionary adaptations from switching their specificities between single-TM and multi-TM receptors. This evidence also implies that gamma-retroviruses formed by divergent evolution from a common origin millions of years ago and that individual viruses have occasionally jumped between species (zoonoses) while retaining their commitment to using the orthologous receptor of the new host. Another surprise is that many gamma-retroviruses use not just one receptor but pairs of closely related receptors as alternatives. This appears to have enhanced viral survival by severely limiting the likelihood of host escape mutations. All of the receptors used by gamma-retroviruses contain hypervariable regions that are often heavily glycosylated and that control the viral host range properties, consistent with the idea that these sequences are battlegrounds of virus-host coevolution. However, in contrast to previous assumptions, we propose that gamma-retroviruses have become adapted to recognize conserved sites that are important for the receptor's natural function and that the hypervariable sequences have been elaborated by the hosts as defense bulwarks that surround the conserved viral attachment sites. Previously, it was believed that binding to receptors directly triggers a series of conformational changes in the viral envelope glycoproteins that culminate in fusion of the viral and cellular membranes. However, new evidence suggests that gamma-retroviral association with receptors triggers an obligatory interaction or cross-talk between envelope glycoproteins on the viral surface. If this intermediate step is prevented, infection fails. Conversely, in several circumstances this cross-talk can be induced in the absence of a cell surface receptor for the virus, in which case infection can proceed efficiently. This new evidence strongly implies that the role of cell surface receptors in infections of gamma-retroviruses (and perhaps of other enveloped animal viruses) is more complex and interesting than was previously imagined. Recently, another gammaretroviral receptor with multiple transmembrane sequences was cloned. See Prassolov, Y., Zhang, D., Ivanov, D., Lohler, J., Ross, S.R., and Stocking, C. Sodium-dependent myo-inositol transporter 1 is a receptor for Mus cervicolor M813 murine leukemia virus.

Two highly conserved glutamate residues critical for type III sodium-dependent phosphate transport revealed by uncoupling transport function from retroviral receptor function

Type III sodium-dependent phosphate (NaP(i)) cotransporters, Pit1 and Pit2, have been assigned housekeeping P(i) transport functions and suggested involved in chondroblastic and osteoblastic mineralization and ectopic calcification. Both proteins exhibit dual function, thus, besides being transporters, they also serve as receptors for several gammaretroviruses. We here show that it is possible to uncouple transport and receptor functions of a type III NaP(i) cotransporter and thus exploit the retroviral receptor function as a control for proper processing and folding of mutant proteins. Thus exchanging two putative transmembranic glutamate residues in human Pit2, Glu(55) and Glu(575), with glutamine or with lysine severely impaired or knocked out, respectively, P(i) transport function, but left viral receptor function undisturbed. Both glutamates are conserved in type III NaP(i) cotransporters, in fungal NaP(i) cotransporters PHO-4 and Pho89, and in other known or putative phosphate permeases from a number of species and are the first residues shown to be critical for type III NaP(i) cotransport. Their putative transmembranic positions together with the presented data are consistent with Glu(55) and Glu(575) being parts of a cation liganding site or playing roles in conformational changes associated with substrate transport. Finally, the results also show that Pit2 retroviral receptor function per se is not dependent on Pit2 P(i) transport function.

Genetic and biochemical analyses of receptor and cofactor determinants for T-cell-tropic feline leukemia virus infection

Entry by retroviruses is mediated through interactions between the viral envelope glycoprotein and the host cell receptor(s). We recently identified two host cell proteins, FeLIX and Pit1, that are necessary for infection by cytopathic, T-cell-tropic feline leukemia viruses (FeLV-T). Pit1 is a classic multiple transmembrane protein used as a receptor by several other simple retroviruses, including subgroup B FeLV (FeLV-B), and FeLIX is a secreted cellular protein expressed from endogenous FeLV-related sequences (enFeLV). FeLIX is nearly identical to FeLV-B envelope sequences that encode the N-terminal half of the viral surface unit (SU), because these FeLV-B sequences are acquired by recombination with enFeLV. FeLV-B SUs can functionally substitute for FeLIX in mediating FeLV-T infection. Both of these enFeLV-derived cofactors can efficiently facilitate FeLV-T infection only of cells expressing Pit1, not of cells expressing the related transport protein Pit2. We therefore have used chimeric Pit1/Pit2 receptors to map the determinants for cofactor binding and FeLV-T infection. Three distinct determinants appear to be required for cofactor-dependent infection by FeLV-T. We also found that Pit1 sequences within these same domains were required for binding by FeLIX to the Pit receptor. In contrast, these determinants were not all required for receptor binding by the FeLV-B SU cofactors used in this study. These data indicate that cofactor binding is not sufficient for FeLV-T infection and suggest that there may be a direct interaction between FeLV-T and the Pit1 receptor.

Transmembrane topology of PiT-2, a phosphate transporter-retrovirus receptor

PiT-1 and PiT-2 are related multiple transmembrane proteins which function as sodium-dependent phosphate transporters and as the cell receptors of several oncoretroviruses. Two copies of a homology domain that is found in distantly related species assign these proteins to a large family of phosphate transporters. A current membrane topology model of PiT-1 and PiT-2 predicts 10 transmembrane domains. However, the validity of this model has not been addressed experimentally. We addressed this issue by a comprehensive study of human PiT-2. Evidence was obtained for glycosylation of asparagine 81. Epitope tagging showed that the N- and C-terminal extremities are extracellular. The orientation of C-terminal-truncation mutants expressed in cell-free translation assays and incorporated into microsomal membranes was examined by immunoprecipitation. Data were interpreted with respect to previous knowledge about retrovirus binding sites, to the existence of repeated homology domains, and to predictions made in family members. A model in which PiT-2 has 12 transmembrane domains and extracellular N- and C-terminal extremities is proposed. This model, which differs significantly from previous predictions about PiT-2 topology, may be useful for further investigations of PiT-2 interactions with other proteins and for the understanding of PiT-2 transporter and virus receptor functions.

A 13-amino-acid Pit1-specific loop 4 sequence confers feline leukemia virus subgroup B receptor function upon Pit2

Feline leukemia virus subgroup B (FeLV-B) and gibbon ape leukemia virus (GALV) utilize the human protein Pit1 but not the related protein, Pit2, as receptor. A stretch of 9 amino acids, named region A, was identified in the putative fourth extracellular loop of Pit1 (residues 550 through 558) as critical for FeLV-B and GALV receptor function. However, the presence of Pit1 region A did not confer receptor function for FeLV-B upon Pit2, while it did so for GALV. We have here shown that the presence of two Pit1-specific loop 4 residues (tyrosine 546 and valine 548) in addition to Pit1 region A is sufficient to make Pit2 an efficient FeLV-B receptor; that is, a stretch of 13 amino acids encompassing all loop 4 amino acid differences between Pit1 and Pit2 comprises a C-terminal determinant for FeLV-B receptor function. Thus, the same limited receptor region is sufficient to confer receptor function for both viruses upon Pit2.

A comprehensive approach to mapping the interacting surfaces of murine amphotropic and feline subgroup B leukemia viruses with their cell surface receptors

Because mutations in envelope glycoproteins of retroviruses or in their cell surface receptors can eliminate function by multiple mechanisms, it has been difficult to unambiguously identify sites for their interactions by site-directed mutagenesis. Recently, we developed a gain-of-function approach to overcome this problem. Our strategy relies on the fact that feline leukemia virus subgroup B (FeLV-B) and amphotropic murine leukemia virus (A-MLV) have closely related gp70 surface envelope glycoproteins and use related Na(+)-dependent phosphate symporters, Pit1 and Pit2, respectively, as their receptors. We previously observed that FeLV-B/A-MLV envelope glycoprotein chimeras spliced between the variable regions VRA and VRB were unable to use Pit1 or Pit2 as a receptor but could efficiently use specific Pit1/Pit2 chimeras. The latter study suggested that the VRA of A-MLV and FeLV-B functionally interact with the presumptive extracellular loops 4 and 5 (ECL4 and -5) of their respective receptors, whereas VRB interacts with ECL2. We also found that FeLV-B gp70 residues F60 and P61 and A-MLV residues Y60 and V61 in the first disulfide-bonded loop of VRA were important for functional interaction with the receptor's ECL4 or -5. We have now extended this approach to identify additional VRA and VRB residues that are involved in receptor recognition. Our studies imply that FeLV-B VRA residues F60 and P61 interact with the Pit1 ECL5 region, whereas VRA residues 66 to 78 interact with Pit1 ECL4. Correspondingly, A-MLV VRA residues Y60 and V61 interact with the Pit2 ECL5 region, whereas residues 66 to 78 interact with Pit2 ECL4. Similar studies that focused on the gp70 VRB implicated residues 129 to 139 as contributing to specific interactions with the receptor ECL2. These results identify three regions of gp70 that interact in a specific manner with distinct portions of their receptors, thereby providing a map of the functionally interacting surfaces.