Structured and Dynamic Disordered Domains Regulate the Activity of a Multifunctional Anti-σ Factor

The functional differences between paralogous regulators define the control of the General Stress Response in Sphingopyxis granuli TFA

Sphingopyxis granuli TFA is a contaminant degrading alphaproteobacterium that responds to adverse conditions by inducing the general stress response (GSR), an adaptive response that controls the transcription of a variety of genes to overcome adverse conditions. The core GSR regulators (the response regulator PhyR, the anti‐σ factor NepR and the σ factor EcfG) are duplicated in TFA, being PhyR1 and PhyR2, NepR1 and NepR2 and EcfG1 and EcfG2. Based on multiple genetic, phenotypical and biochemical evidences including in vitro transcription assays, we have assigned distinct functional features to each paralogue and assessed their contribution to the GSR regulation, dictating its timing and the intensity. We show that different stress signals are differentially integrated into the GSR by PhyR1 and PhyR2, therefore producing different levels of GSR activation. We demonstrate in vitro that both NepR1 and NepR2 bind EcfG1 and EcfG2, although NepR1 produces a more stable interaction than NepR2. Conversely, NepR2 interacts with phosphorylated PhyR1 and PhyR2 more efficiently than NepR1. We propose an integrative model where NepR2 would play a dual negative role: it would directly inhibit the σ factors upon activation of the GSR and it would modulate the GSR activity indirectly by titrating the PhyR regulators.

Extracytoplasmic Function σ Factors as Tools for Coordinating Stress Responses

The ability of bacterial core RNA polymerase (RNAP) to interact with different σ factors, thereby forming a variety of holoenzymes with different specificities, represents a powerful tool to coordinately reprogram gene expression. Extracytoplasmic function σ factors (ECFs), which are the largest and most diverse family of alternative σ factors, frequently participate in stress responses. The classification of ECFs in 157 different groups according to their phylogenetic relationships and genomic context has revealed their diversity. Here, we have clustered 55 ECF groups with experimentally studied representatives into two broad classes of stress responses. The remaining 102 groups still lack any mechanistic or functional insight, representing a myriad of systems yet to explore. In this work, we review the main features of ECFs and discuss the different mechanisms controlling their production and activity, and how they lead to a functional stress response. Finally, we focus in more detail on two well-characterized ECFs, for which the mechanisms to detect and respond to stress are complex and completely different: Escherichia coli RpoE, which is the best characterized ECF and whose structural and functional studies have provided key insights into the transcription initiation by ECF-RNAP holoenzymes, and the ECF15-type EcfG, the master regulator of the general stress response in Alphaproteobacteria.

Modulation of Response Regulator CheY Reaction Kinetics by Two Variable Residues That Affect Conformation

Microorganisms and plants utilize two-component systems to regulate adaptive responses to changing environmental conditions. Sensor kinases detect stimuli and alter their autophosphorylation activity accordingly. Signal propagation occurs via the transfer of phosphoryl groups from upstream kinases to downstream response regulator proteins. Removal of phosphoryl groups from the response regulator typically resets the system. Members of the same protein family may catalyze phosphorylation and dephosphorylation reactions with different efficiencies, exhibiting rate constants spanning many orders of magnitude to accommodate response time scales from milliseconds to days. We previously found that variable positions one or two residues to the C-terminal side of the conserved Asp phosphorylation site (D+2) or Thr/Ser (T+1/T+2) in response regulators alter reaction kinetics by direct interaction with phosphodonor or phosphoacceptor molecules. Here, we explore the kinetic effects of amino acid substitutions at the two positions immediately C-terminal to the conserved Lys (K+1/K+2) in the model Escherichia coli response regulator CheY. We measured CheY autophosphorylation and autodephosphorylation rate constants for 27 pairs of K+1/K+2 residues that represent 84% of naturally occurring response regulators. Effects on autodephosphorylation were modest, but autophosphorylation rate constants varied by 2 orders of magnitude, suggesting that the K+1/K+2 positions influence reaction kinetics by altering the conformational spectrum sampled by CheY at equilibrium. Additional evidence supporting this indirect mechanism includes the following: the effect on autophosphorylation rate constants is independent of the phosphodonor, the autophosphorylation rate constants and dissociation constants for the phosphoryl group analog BeF₃ ^- are inversely correlated, and the K+1/K+2 positions are distant from the phosphorylation site.IMPORTANCE We have identified five variable positions in response regulators that allow the rate constants of autophosphorylation and autodephosporylation reactions each to be altered over 3 orders of magnitude in CheY. The distributions of variable residue combinations across response regulator subfamilies suggest that distinct mechanisms associated with different variable positions allow reaction rates to be tuned independently during evolution for diverse biological purposes. This knowledge could be used in synthetic-biology applications to adjust the properties (e.g., background noise and response duration) of biosensors and may allow prediction of response regulator reaction kinetics from the primary amino acid sequence.

Complex general stress response regulation in Sphingomonas melonis Fr1 revealed by transcriptional analyses

The general stress response (GSR) represents an important trait to survive in the environment by leading to multiple stress resistance. In alphaproteobacteria, the GSR is under the transcriptional control of the alternative sigma factor EcfG. Here we performed transcriptome analyses to investigate the genes controlled by EcfG of Sphingomonas melonis Fr1 and the plasticity of this regulation under stress conditions. We found that EcfG regulates genes for proteins that are typically associated with stress responses. Moreover, EcfG controls regulatory proteins, which likely fine-tune the GSR. Among these, we identified a novel negative GSR feedback regulator, termed NepR2, on the basis of gene reporter assays, phenotypic analyses, and biochemical assays. Transcriptional profiling of signaling components upstream of EcfG under complex stress conditions showed an overall congruence with EcfG-regulated genes. Interestingly however, we found that the GSR is transcriptionally linked to the regulation of motility and biofilm formation via the single domain response regulator SdrG and GSR-activating histidine kinases. Altogether, our findings indicate that the GSR in S. melonis Fr1 underlies a complex regulation to optimize resource allocation and resilience in stressful and changing environments.

A Single-Domain Response Regulator Functions as an Integrating Hub To Coordinate General Stress Response and Development in Alphaproteobacteria

The alphaproteobacterial general stress response is governed by a conserved partner-switching mechanism that is triggered by phosphorylation of the response regulator PhyR. In the model organism Caulobacter crescentus, PhyR was proposed to be phosphorylated by the histidine kinase PhyK, but biochemical evidence in support of such a role of PhyK is missing. Here, we identify a single-domain response regulator, MrrA, that is essential for general stress response activation in C. crescentus We demonstrate that PhyK does not function as a kinase but accepts phosphoryl groups from MrrA and passes them on to PhyR, adopting the role of a histidine phosphotransferase. MrrA is phosphorylated by at least six histidine kinases that likely serve as stress sensors. MrrA also transfers phosphate to LovK, a histidine kinase involved in C. crescentus holdfast production and attachment, which also negatively regulates the general stress response. We show that LovK together with the response regulator LovR acts as a phosphate sink to redirect phosphate flux away from the PhyKR branch. In agreement with the biochemical data, an mrrA mutant is unable to activate the general stress response and shows a hyperattachment phenotype, which is linked to decreased expression of the major holdfast inhibitory protein HfiA. We propose that MrrA serves as a central phosphorylation hub that coordinates the general stress response with C. crescentus development and other adaptive behaviors. The characteristic bow-tie architecture of this phosphorylation network with MrrA as the central knot may expedite the evolvability and species-specific niche adaptation of this group of bacteria.IMPORTANCE Two-component systems (TCSs) consisting of a histidine kinase and a cognate response regulator are predominant signal transduction systems in bacteria. To avoid cross talk, TCSs are generally thought to be highly insulated from each other. However, this notion is based largely on studies of the HisKA subfamily of histidine kinases, while little information is available for the HWE and HisKA2 subfamilies. The latter have been implicated in the alphaproteobacterial general stress response. Here, we show that in the model organism Caulobacter crescentus an atypical FATGUY-type single-domain response regulator, MrrA, is highly promiscuous in accepting and transferring phosphoryl groups from and to multiple up- and downstream kinases, challenging the current view of strictly insulated TCSs. Instead, we propose that FATGUY response regulators have evolved in alphaproteobacteria as central phosphorylation hubs to broadly sample information and distribute phosphoryl groups between the general stress response pathway and other TCSs, thereby coordinating multiple cellular behaviors.

Regulation of σ factors by conserved partner switches controlled by divergent signalling systems

Partner-Switching Systems (PSS) are widespread regulatory systems, each comprising a kinase-anti-σ, a phosphorylatable anti-σ antagonist and a phosphatase module. The anti-σ domain quickly sequesters or delivers the target σ factor according to the phosphorylation state of the anti-σ antagonist induced by environmental signals. The PSS components are proteins alone or merged to other domains probably to adapt to the input signals. PSS are involved in major cellular processes including stress response, sporulation, biofilm formation and pathogenesis. Surprisingly, the target σ factors are often unknown and the sensing modules acting upstream from the PSS diverge according to the bacterial species. Indeed, they belong to either two-component systems or complex pathways as the stressosome or Chemosensory Systems (CS). Based on a phylogenetic analysis, we propose that the sensing module in Gram-negative bacteria is often a CS.

Allosteric control of a bacterial stress response system by an anti-σ factor

Bacterial signal transduction systems commonly use receiver (REC) domains, which regulate adaptive responses to the environment as a function of their phosphorylation state. REC domains control cell physiology through diverse mechanisms, many of which remain understudied. We have defined structural features that underlie activation of the multi-domain REC protein, PhyR, which functions as an anti-anti-σ factor and regulates transcription of genes required for stress adaptation and host-microbe interactions in Alphaproteobacteria. Though REC phosphorylation is necessary for PhyR function in vivo, we did not detect expected changes in inter-domain interactions upon phosphorylation by solution X-ray scattering. We sought to understand this result by defining additional molecular requirements for PhyR activation. We uncovered specific interactions between unphosphorylated PhyR and an intrinsically disordered region (IDR) of the anti-σ factor, NepR, by solution NMR spectroscopy. Our data support a model whereby nascent NepR(IDR)-PhyR interactions and REC phosphorylation coordinately impart the free energy to shift PhyR to an open, active conformation that binds and inhibits NepR. This mechanism ensures PhyR is activated only when NepR and an activating phosphoryl signal are present. Our study provides new structural understanding of the molecular regulatory logic underlying a conserved environmental response system.

Protection of the general stress response σS factor by the CrsR regulator allows a rapid and efficient adaptation of Shewanella oneidensis

To cope with environmental stresses, bacteria have evolved various strategies, including the general stress response (GSR). GSR is governed by an alternative transcriptional σ factor named σ^S (RpoS) that associates with RNA polymerase and controls the expression of numerous genes. Previously, we have reported that posttranslational regulation of σ^S in the aquatic bacterium Shewanella oneidensis involves the CrsR-CrsA partner-switching regulatory system, but the exact mechanism by which CrsR and CrsA control σ^S activity is not completely unveiled. Here, using a translational gene fusion, we show that CrsR sequesters and protects σ^S during the exponential growth phase and thus enables rapid gene activation by σ^S as soon as the cells enter early stationary phase. We further demonstrate by an in vitro approach that this protection is mediated by the anti-σ domain of CrsR. Structure-based alignments of CsrR orthologs and other anti-σ factors identified a CsrR-specific region characteristic of a new family of anti-σ factors. We found that CrsR is conserved in many aquatic proteobacteria, and most of the time it is associated with CrsA. In conclusion, our results suggest that CsrR-mediated protection of σ^S during exponential growth enables rapid adaptation of S. oneidensis to changing and stressful growth conditions, and this ability is probably widespread among aquatic proteobacteria.

Brucella abortus ΔrpoE1 confers protective immunity against wild type challenge in a mouse model of brucellosis

The Brucella abortus general stress response (GSR) system regulates activity of the alternative sigma factor, σ(E1), which controls transcription of approximately 100 genes and is required for persistence in a BALB/c mouse chronic infection model. We evaluated the host response to infection by a B. abortus strain lacking σ(E1) (ΔrpoE1), and identified pathological and immunological features that distinguish ΔrpoE1-infected mice from wild-type (WT), and that correspond with clearance of ΔrpoE1 from the host. ΔrpoE1 infection was indistinguishable from WT in terms of splenic bacterial burden, inflammation and histopathology up to 6weeks post-infection. However, Brucella-specific serum IgG levels in ΔrpoE1-infected mice were 5 times higher than WT by 4weeks post-infection, and remained significantly higher throughout the course of a 12-week infection. Total IgG and Brucella-specific IgG levels peaked strongly in ΔrpoE1-infected mice at 6weeks, which correlated with reduced splenomegaly and bacterial burden relative to WT-infected mice. Given the difference in immune response to infection with wild-type and ΔrpoE1, we tested whether ΔrpoE1 confers protective immunity to wild-type challenge. Mice immunized with ΔrpoE1 completely resisted WT infection and had significantly higher serum titers of Brucella-specific IgG, IgG2a and IFN-γ after WT challenge relative to age-matched naïve mice. We conclude that immunization of BALB/c mice with the B. abortus GSR pathway mutant, ΔrpoE1, elicits an adaptive immune response that confers significant protective immunity against WT infection.

Basis of Mutual Domain Inhibition in a Bacterial Response Regulator

Information transmission in biological signaling networks is commonly considered to be a unidirectional flow of information between protein partners. According to this view, many bacterial response regulator proteins utilize input receiver (REC) domains to "switch" functional outputs, using REC phosphorylation to shift pre-existing equilibria between inactive and active conformations. However, recent data indicate that output domains themselves also shift such equilibria, implying a "mutual inhibition" model. Here we use solution nuclear magnetic resonance to provide a mechanistic basis for such control in a PhyR-type response regulator. Our structure of the isolated, non-phosphorylated REC domain surprisingly reveals a fully active conformation, letting us identify structural and dynamic changes imparted by the output domain to inactivate the full-length protein. Additional data reveal transient structural changes within the full-length protein, facilitating activation. Our data provide a basis for understanding the changes that REC and output domains undergo to set a default "inactive" state.

General Stress Signaling in the Alphaproteobacteria

The Alphaproteobacteria uniquely integrate features of two-component signal transduction and alternative σ factor regulation to control transcription of genes that ensure growth and survival across a range of stress conditions. Research over the past decade has led to the discovery of the key molecular players of this general stress response (GSR) system, including the sigma factor σ(EcfG), its anti-σ factor NepR, and the anti-anti-σ factor PhyR. The central molecular event of GSR activation entails aspartyl phosphorylation of PhyR, which promotes its binding to NepR and thereby releases σ(EcfG) to associate with RNAP and direct transcription. Recent studies are providing a new understanding of complex, multilayered sensory networks that activate and repress this central protein partner switch. This review synthesizes our structural and functional understanding of the core GSR regulatory proteins and highlights emerging data that are defining the systems that regulate GSR transcription in a variety of species.