Piccolo NuA4-catalyzed acetylation of nucleosomal histones: critical roles of an Esa1 Tudor/chromo barrel loop and an Epl1 enhancer of polycomb A (EPcA) basic region

The Tudor-knot Domain of KAT5 Regulates Nucleosomal Substrate Acetylation

The lysine acetyltransferase KAT5 is a pivotal enzyme responsible for catalyzing histone H4 acetylation in cells. In addition to its indispensable HAT domain, KAT5 also encompasses a conserved Tudor-knot domain at its N-terminus. However, the function of this domain remains elusive, with conflicting findings regarding its role as a histone reader. In our study, we have employed a CRISPR tiling array approach and unveiled the Tudor-knot motif as an essential domain for cell survival. The Tudor-knot domain does not bind to histone tails and is not required for KAT5's chromatin occupancy. However, its absence leads to a global reduction in histone acetylation, accompanied with genome-wide alterations in gene expression that consequently result in diminished cell viability. Mechanistically, we find that the Tudor-knot domain regulates KAT5's HAT activity on nucleosomes by fine-tuning substrate accessibility. In summary, our study uncovers the Tudor-knot motif as an essential domain for cell survival and reveals its critical role in modulating KAT5's catalytic efficiency on nucleosome and KAT5-dependent transcriptional programs critical for cell viability.

Structure of the NuA4 histone acetyltransferase complex

Nucleosome acetyltransferase of H4 (NuA4), one of two major histone acetyltransferase complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae specifically acetylates histone H2A and H4, resulting in increased transcriptional activity. Here we present a 3.8-4.0 Å resolution structure of the NuA4 complex from cryoelectron microscopy and associated biochemical studies. The determined structure comprises six subunits and appropriately 5,000 amino acids, with a backbone formed by subunits Eaf1 and Eaf2 spanning from an Actin-Arp4 module to a platform subunit Tra1. Seven subunits are missing from the cryo-EM map. The locations of missing components, Yaf9, and three subunits of the Piccolo module Esa1, Yng2, and Eaf6 were determined. Biochemical studies showed that the Piccolo module and the complete NuA4 exhibit comparable histone acetyltransferase activities, but the Piccolo module binds to nucleosomes, whereas the complete NuA4 does not. The interaction lifetime of NuA4 and nucleosome is evidently short, possibly because of subunits of the NuA4 complex that diminish the affinity of the Piccolo module for the nucleosome, enabling rapid movement from nucleosome to nucleosome.

Structure of the NuA4 acetyltransferase complex bound to the nucleosome

Deoxyribonucleic acid in eukaryotes wraps around the histone octamer to form nucleosomes¹, the fundamental unit of chromatin. The N termini of histone H4 interact with nearby nucleosomes and play an important role in the formation of high-order chromatin structure and heterochromatin silencing^2-4. NuA4 in yeast and its homologue Tip60 complex in mammalian cells are the key enzymes that catalyse H4 acetylation, which in turn regulates chromatin packaging and function in transcription activation and DNA repair^5-10. Here we report the cryo-electron microscopy structure of NuA4 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae bound to the nucleosome. NuA4 comprises two major modules: the catalytic histone acetyltransferase (HAT) module and the transcription activator-binding (TRA) module. The nucleosome is mainly bound by the HAT module and is positioned close to a polybasic surface of the TRA module, which is important for the optimal activity of NuA4. The nucleosomal linker DNA carrying the upstream activation sequence is oriented towards the conserved, transcription activator-binding surface of the Tra1 subunit, which suggests a potential mechanism of NuA4 to act as a transcription co-activator. The HAT module recognizes the disk face of the nucleosome through the H2A-H2B acidic patch and nucleosomal DNA, projecting the catalytic pocket of Esa1 to the N-terminal tail of H4 and supporting its function in selective acetylation of H4. Together, our findings illustrate how NuA4 is assembled and provide mechanistic insights into nucleosome recognition and transcription co-activation by a HAT.

TDRD5 Is Required for Spermatogenesis and Oogenesis in Locusta migratoria

Tudor family proteins exist in all eukaryotic organisms and play a role in many cellular processes by recognizing and binding to proteins with methylated arginine or lysine residues. TDRD5, a member of Tudor domain-containing proteins (TDRDs), has been implicated in the P-element-induced wimpy testis-interacting RNA (piRNA) pathway and germ cell development in some model species, but little is known about its function in other species. Therefore, we identified and characterized LmTDRD5, the TDRD5 ortholog in Locusta migratoria, a hemimetabolous pest. The LmTdrd5 gene has 19 exons that encode a protein possessing a single copy of the Tudor domain and three LOTUS domains at its N-terminus. qRT-PCR analysis revealed a high LmTdrd5 expression level in genital glands. Using RNA interference, LmTdrd5 knockdown in males led to a lag in meiosis phase transition, decreased spermatid elongation and sperm production, and downregulated the expression of the two germ cell-specific transcription factors, LmCREM and LmACT, as well as the sperm tail marker gene LmQrich2.LmTdrd5 knockdown in females reduced the expression levels of vitellogenin (Vg) and Vg receptor (VgR) and impaired ovarian development and oocyte maturation, thus decreasing the hatchability rate. These results demonstrate that LmTdrd5 is essential for germ cell development and fertility in locusts, indicating a conserved function for TDRD5.

Identification of an Immunogenic Medulloblastoma-Specific Fusion Involving EPC2 and GULP1

Medulloblastoma is the most common malignant brain tumor in children. Immunotherapy is yet to demonstrate dramatic results in medulloblastoma, one reason being the low rate of mutations creating new antigens in this entity. In tumors with low mutational burden, gene fusions may represent a source of tumor-specific neoantigens. Here, we reviewed the landscape of fusions in medulloblastoma and analyzed their predicted immunogenicity. Furthermore, we described a new in-frame fusion protein identified by RNA-Seq. The fusion involved two genes on chromosome 2 coding for the enhancer of polycomb homolog 2 (EPC2) and GULP PTB domain containing engulfment adaptor 1 (GULP1) respectively. By qRT-PCR analysis, the fusion was detected in 3 out of 11 medulloblastoma samples, whereby 2 samples were from the same patients obtained at 2 different time points (initial diagnosis and relapse), but not in other pediatric brain tumor entities. Cloning of the full-length sequence indicated that the fusion protein contains the N-terminal enhancer of polycomb-like domain A (EPcA) of EPC2 and the coiled-coil domain of GULP1. In silico analyses predicted binding of the neoantigen-derived peptide to HLA-A*0201. A total of 50% of the fusions described in the literature were also predicted to produce an immunogenic peptide. The EPC2-GULP1 fusion peptide was able to induce a de novo T cell response characterized by interferon gamma release of CD8⁺ cytotoxic T cells in vitro. While the functional relevance of this fusion in medulloblastoma biology remains to be clarified, our data support an immunotherapeutic approach for pediatric medulloblastoma patients carrying the EPC2-GULP1 fusion and other immunogenic fusions.

Approaches to Study Native Chromatin-Modifying Complex Activities and Functions

The modification of histones—the structural components of chromatin—is a central topic in research efforts to understand the mechanisms regulating genome expression and stability. These modifications frequently occur through associations with multisubunit complexes, which contain active enzymes and additional components that orient their specificity and read the histone modifications that comprise epigenetic signatures. To understand the functions of these modifications it is critical to study the enzymes and substrates involved in their native contexts. Here, we describe experimental approaches to purify native chromatin modifiers complexes from mammalian cells and to produce recombinant nucleosomes that are used as substrates to determine the activity of the complex. In addition, we present a novel approach, similar to the yeast anchor-away system, to study the functions of essential chromatin modifiers by quickly inducing their depletion from the nucleus. The step-by-step protocols included will help standardize these approaches in the research community, enabling convincing conclusions about the specificities and functions of these crucial regulators of the eukaryotic genome.

Transcription shapes genome-wide histone acetylation patterns

Histone acetylation is a ubiquitous hallmark of transcription, but whether the link between histone acetylation and transcription is causal or consequential has not been addressed. Using immunoblot and chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing in S. cerevisiae, here we show that the majority of histone acetylation is dependent on transcription. This dependency is partially explained by the requirement of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) for the interaction of H4 histone acetyltransferases (HATs) with gene bodies. Our data also confirms the targeting of HATs by transcription activators, but interestingly, promoter-bound HATs are unable to acetylate histones in the absence of transcription. Indeed, HAT occupancy alone poorly predicts histone acetylation genome-wide, suggesting that HAT activity is regulated post-recruitment. Consistent with this, we show that histone acetylation increases at nucleosomes predicted to stall RNAPII, supporting the hypothesis that this modification is dependent on nucleosome disruption during transcription. Collectively, these data show that histone acetylation is a consequence of RNAPII promoting both the recruitment and activity of histone acetyltransferases.

Molecular Architecture of the Essential Yeast Histone Acetyltransferase Complex NuA4 Redefines Its Multimodularity

Conserved from yeast to humans, the NuA4 histone acetyltransferase is a large multisubunit complex essential for cell viability through the regulation of gene expression, genome maintenance, metabolism, and cell fate during development and stress. How the different NuA4 subunits work in concert with one another to perform these diverse functions remains unclear, and addressing this central question requires a comprehensive understanding of NuA4's molecular architecture and subunit organization. We have determined the structure of fully assembled native yeast NuA4 by single-particle electron microscopy. Our data revealed that NuA4 adopts a trilobal overall architecture, with each of the three lobes constituted by one or two functional modules. By performing cross-linking coupled to mass spectrometry analysis and in vitro protein interaction studies, we further mapped novel intermolecular interfaces within NuA4. Finally, we combined these new data with other known structural information of NuA4 subunits and subassemblies to construct a multiscale model to illustrate how the different NuA4 subunits and modules are spatially arranged. This model shows that the multiple chromatin reader domains are clustered together around the catalytic core, suggesting that NuA4's multimodular architecture enables it to engage in multivalent interactions with its nucleosome substrate.

Structural and mechanistic insights into regulation of HBO1 histone acetyltransferase activity by BRPF2

HBO1, a member of the MYST family of histone acetyltransferases (HATs), is required for global acetylation of histone H3K14 and embryonic development. It functions as a catalytic subunit in multisubunit complexes comprising a BRPF1/2/3 or JADE1/2/3 scaffold protein, and two accessory proteins. BRPF2 has been shown to be important for the HAT activity of HBO1 toward H3K14. Here we demonstrated that BRPF2 can regulate the HAT activity of HBO1 toward free H3 and H4, and nucleosomal H3. Particularly, a short N-terminal region of BRPF2 is sufficient for binding to HBO1 and can potentiate its activity toward H3K14. The crystal structure of the HBO1 MYST domain in complex with this segment of BRPF2 together with the biochemical and cell biological data revealed the key residues responsible for the HBO1–BRPF2 interaction. Our structural and functional data together indicate that the N-terminal region of BRPF2 plays an important role in the binding of HBO1 and a minor role in the binding of nucleosomes, which provide new mechanistic insights into the regulation of the HAT activity of HBO1 by BRPF2.

Critical genomic regulation mediated by Enhancer of Polycomb

Enhancer of Polycomb (EPC) was first identified for its contributions to development in Drosophila and was soon-thereafter purified as a subunit of the NuA4/TIP60 acetyltransferase complex. Since then, EPC has often been left in the shadows as an essential, yet non-catalytic subunit of NuA4/TIP60; however, its deep conservation and disease association make clear that it warrants additional attention. In fact, recent studies in yeast demonstrated that its Enhancer of Polycomb, Epl1, was just as important for gene expression and acetylation as is the catalytic subunit of NuA4. Despite its conservation, studies of EPC have often remained siloed between organisms. Here, our goal is to provide a cohesive view of the current state of the EPC literature as it stands among the major model organisms in which it has been studied. EPC is involved in multiple processes, beginning with its cardinal role in regulating global and targeted histone acetylation. EPC also frequently serves as an important interaction partner in these basic cellular functions, as well as in multicellular development, such as in hematopoiesis and skeletal muscle differentiation, and in human disease. Taken together, a unifying theme from these studies highlights EPC as a critical genomic regulator.

The TIP60 Complex Regulates Bivalent Chromatin Recognition by 53BP1 through Direct H4K20me Binding and H2AK15 Acetylation

The NuA4/TIP60 acetyltransferase complex is a key regulator of genome expression and stability. Here we identified MBTD1 as a stable subunit of the complex, and we reveal that, via a histone reader domain for H4K20me1/2, MBTD1 allows TIP60 to associate with specific gene promoters and to promote the repair of DNA double-strand breaks by homologous recombination. It was previously suggested that TIP60-dependent acetylation of H4 regulates binding of the non-homologous end joining factor 53BP1, which engages chromatin through simultaneous binding of H4K20me2 and H2AK15ub. We find that the TIP60 complex regulates association of 53BP1 partly by competing for H4K20me2 and by regulating H2AK15ub. Ubiquitylation of H2AK15 by RNF168 inhibits chromatin acetylation by TIP60, while this residue can be acetylated by TIP60 in vivo, blocking its ubiquitylation. Altogether, these results uncover an intricate mechanism orchestrated by the TIP60 complex to regulate 53BP1-dependent repair through competitive bivalent binding and modification of chromatin.

Chromatin Regulation by the NuA4 Acetyltransferase Complex Is Mediated by Essential Interactions Between Enhancer of Polycomb (Epl1) and Esa1

Enzymes that modify and remodel chromatin act in broadly conserved macromolecular complexes. One key modification is the dynamic acetylation of histones and other chromatin proteins by opposing activities of acetyltransferase and deacetylase complexes. Among acetyltransferases, the NuA4 complex containing Tip60 or its Saccharomyces cerevisiae ortholog Esa1 is of particular significance because of its roles in crucial genomic processes including DNA damage repair and transcription. The catalytic subunit Esa1 is essential, as are five noncatalytic NuA4 subunits. We found that of the noncatalytic subunits, deletion of Enhancer of polycomb (Epl1), but not the others, can be bypassed by loss of a major deacetylase complex, a property shared by Esa1 Noncatalytic complex subunits can be critical for complex assembly, stability, genomic targeting, substrate specificity, and regulation. Understanding the essential role of Epl1 has been previously limited, a limitation now overcome by the discovery of its bypass suppression. Here, we present a comprehensive in vivo study of Epl1 using the powerful tool of suppression combined with transcriptional and mutational analyses. Our results highlight functional parallels between Epl1 and Esa1 and further illustrate that the structural role of Epl1 is important for promotion of Esa1 activity. This conclusion is strengthened by our dissection of Epl1 domains required in vivo for interaction with specific NuA4 subunits, histone acetylation, and chromatin targeting. These results provide new insights for the conserved, essential nature of Epl1 and its homologs, such as EPC1/2 in humans, which is frequently altered in cancers.

Combined Action of Histone Reader Modules Regulates NuA4 Local Acetyltransferase Function but Not Its Recruitment on the Genome

Recognition of histone marks by reader modules is thought to be at the heart of epigenetic mechanisms. These protein domains are considered to function by targeting regulators to chromosomal loci carrying specific histone modifications. This is important for proper gene regulation as well as propagation of epigenetic information. The NuA4 acetyltransferase complex contains two of these reader modules, an H3K4me3-specific plant homeodomain (PHD) within the Yng2 subunit and an H3K36me2/3-specific chromodomain in the Eaf3 subunit. While each domain showed a close functional interaction with the respective histone mark that it recognizes, at the biochemical level, genetic level (as assessed with epistatic miniarray profile screens), and phenotypic level, cells with the combined loss of both readers showed greatly enhanced phenotypes. Chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with next-generation sequencing experiments demonstrated that the Yng2 PHD specifically directs H4 acetylation near the transcription start site of highly expressed genes, while Eaf3 is important downstream on the body of the genes. Strikingly, the recruitment of the NuA4 complex to these loci was not significantly affected. Furthermore, RNA polymerase II occupancy was decreased only under conditions where both PHD and chromodomains were lost, generally in the second half of the gene coding regions. Altogether, these results argue that methylated histone reader modules in NuA4 are not responsible for its recruitment to the promoter or coding regions but, rather, are required to orient its acetyltransferase catalytic site to the methylated histone 3-bearing nucleosomes in the surrounding chromatin, cooperating to allow proper transition from transcription initiation to elongation.

The NuA4 Core Complex Acetylates Nucleosomal Histone H4 through a Double Recognition Mechanism

NuA4 catalyzes the acetylation of nucleosomes at histone H4, which is a well-established epigenetic event, controlling many genomic processes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Here we report the crystal structures of the NuA4 core complex and a cryoelectron microscopy structure with the nucleosome. The structures show that the histone-binding pocket of the enzyme is rearranged, suggesting its activation. The enzyme binds the histone tail mainly through the target lysine residue, with a preference for a small residue at the -1 position. The complex engages the nucleosome at the dish face and orients its catalytic pocket close to the H4 tail to achieve selective acetylation. The combined data reveal a space-sequence double recognition mechanism of the histone tails by a modifying enzyme in the context of the nucleosome.

Combined Interactions of Plant Homeodomain and Chromodomain Regulate NuA4 Activity at DNA Double-Strand Breaks

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) represent one of the most threatening lesions to the integrity of genomes. In yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, NuA4, a histone acetylation complex, is recruited to DSBs, wherein it acetylates histones H2A and H4, presumably relaxing the chromatin and allowing access to repair proteins. Two subunits of NuA4, Yng2 and Eaf3, can interact in vitro with methylated H3K4 and H3K36 via their plant homeodomain (PHD) and chromodomain. However, the roles of the two domains and how they interact in a combinatorial fashion are still poorly characterized. In this study, we generated mutations in the PHD and chromodomain that disrupt their interaction with methylated H3K4 and H3K36. We demonstrate that the combined mutations in both the PHD and chromodomain impair the NuA4 recruitment, reduce H4K12 acetylation at the DSB site, and confer sensitivity to bleomycin that induces DSBs. In addition, the double mutant cells are defective in DSB repair as judged by Southern blot and exhibit prolonged activation of phospho-S129 of H2A. Cells harboring the H3K4R, H3K4R, K36R, or set1Δ set2Δ mutant that disrupts H3K4 and H3K36 methylation also show very similar phenotypes to the PHD and chromodomain double mutant. Our results suggest that multivalent interactions between the PHD, chromodomain, and methylated H3K4 and H3K36 act in a combinatorial manner to recruit NuA4 and regulate the NuA4 activity at the DSB site.

Site specificity analysis of Piccolo NuA4-mediated acetylation for different histone complexes

We have a limited understanding of the site specificity of multi-subunit lysine acetyltransferase (KAT) complexes for histone-based substrates, especially in regards to the different complexes formed during nucleosome assembly. Histone complexes could be a major factor in determining the acetylation specificity of KATs. In the present study, we utilized a label-free quantitative MS-based method to determine the site specificity of acetylation catalysed by Piccolo NuA4 on (H3/H4)2 tetramer, tetramer bound DNA (tetrasome) and nucleosome core particle (NCP). Our results show that Piccolo NuA4 can acetylate multiple lysine residues on these three histone complexes, of which NCP is the most favourable, (H3/H4)2 tetramer is the second and tetrasome is the least favourable substrate for Piccolo NuA4 acetylation. Although Piccolo NuA4 preferentially acetylates histone H4 (H4K12), the site specificity of the enzyme is altered with different histone complex substrates. Our results show that before nucleosome assembly is complete, H3K14 specificity is almost equal to that of H4K12 and DNA-histone interactions suppress the acetylation ability of Piccolo NuA4. These data suggest that the H2A/H2B dimer could play a critical role in the increase in acetylation specificity of Piccolo NuA4 for NCP. This demonstrates that histone complex formation can alter the acetylation preference of Piccolo NuA4. Such findings provide valuable insight into regulating Piccolo NuA4 specificity by modulating chromatin dynamics and in turn manipulating gene expression.

Eaf1p Is Required for Recruitment of NuA4 in Targeting TFIID to the Promoters of the Ribosomal Protein Genes for Transcriptional Initiation In Vivo

NuA4 (nucleosome acetyltransferase of H4) promotes transcriptional initiation of TFIID (a complex of TBP and TBP-associated factors [TAFs])-dependent ribosomal protein genes involved in ribosome biogenesis. However, it is not clearly understood how NuA4 regulates the transcription of ribosomal protein genes. Here, we show that NuA4 is recruited to the promoters of ribosomal protein genes, such as RPS5, RPL2B, and RPS11B, for TFIID recruitment to initiate transcription, and the recruitment of NuA4 to these promoters is impaired in the absence of its Eaf1p component. Intriguingly, impaired NuA4 recruitment in a Δeaf1 strain depletes recruitment of TFIID (a TAF-dependent form of TBP) but not the TAF-independent form of TBP to the promoters of ribosomal protein genes. However, in the absence of NuA4, SAGA (Spt-Ada-Gcn5-acetyltransferase) is involved in targeting the TAF-independent form of TBP to the promoters of ribosomal protein genes for transcriptional initiation. Thus, NuA4 plays an important role in targeting TFIID to the promoters of ribosomal protein genes for transcriptional initiation in vivo. Such a function is mediated via its targeted histone acetyltransferase activity. In the absence of NuA4, ribosomal protein genes lose TFIID dependency and become SAGA dependent for transcriptional initiation. Collectively, these results provide significant insights into the regulation of ribosomal protein gene expression and, hence, ribosome biogenesis and functions.

Histone target selection within chromatin: an exemplary case of teamwork

Histone modifiers like acetyltransferases, methyltransferases, and demethylases are critical regulators of most DNA-based nuclear processes, de facto controlling cell cycle progression and cell fate. These enzymes perform very precise post-translational modifications on specific histone residues, which in turn are recognized by different effector modules/proteins. We now have a better understanding of how these enzymes exhibit such specificity. As they often reside in multisubunit complexes, they use associated factors to target their substrates within chromatin structure and select specific histone mark-bearing nucleosomes. In this review, we cover the current understanding of how histone modifiers select their histone targets. We also explain how different experimental approaches can lead to conflicting results about the histone specificity and function of these enzymes.

Synthetic chromatin approaches to probe the writing and erasing of histone modifications

Posttranslational modifications (PTMs) of chromatin are involved in gene regulation, thereby contributing to cell differentiation, lineage determination, and organism development. Discrete chromatin states are established by the action of a large set of enzymes that catalyze the deposition, propagation, and removal of histone PTMs, thereby modulating gene expression. Given their central role in determining and maintaining cellular phenotype, as well as in controlling chromatin processes such as DNA repair, the dysregulation of these enzymes can have serious consequences, and can result in cancer and neurodegenerative diseases. Thus, such chromatin regulator proteins are promising drug targets. However, they are often present in large, modular protein complexes that specifically recognize target chromatin regions and exhibit intricate regulation through preexisting histone marks. This renders the study of their enzymatic mechanisms complex. Recent developments in the chemical production of defined chromatin substrates show great promise for improving our understanding of the activity of chromatin regulator complexes at the molecular level. Herein I discuss examples highlighting the application of synthetic chromatin to study the enzymatic mechanisms and regulatory pathways of these crucial protein complexes in detail, with potential implications for assay development in pharmacological research.

Exchange of associated factors directs a switch in HBO1 acetyltransferase histone tail specificity

Histone acetyltransferases (HATs) assemble into multisubunit complexes in order to target distinct lysine residues on nucleosomal histones. Here, we characterize native HAT complexes assembled by the BRPF family of scaffold proteins. Their plant homeodomain (PHD)-Zn knuckle-PHD domain is essential for binding chromatin and is restricted to unmethylated H3K4, a specificity that is reversed by the associated ING subunit. Native BRPF1 complexes can contain either MOZ/MORF or HBO1 as catalytic acetyltransferase subunit. Interestingly, while the previously reported HBO1 complexes containing JADE scaffold proteins target histone H4, the HBO1-BRPF1 complex acetylates only H3 in chromatin. We mapped a small region to the N terminus of scaffold proteins responsible for histone tail selection on chromatin. Thus, alternate choice of subunits associated with HBO1 can switch its specificity between H4 and H3 tails. These results uncover a crucial new role for associated proteins within HAT complexes, previously thought to be intrinsic to the catalytic subunit.