1
|
Kurniawan F, Chakraborty A, Oishi HZ, Liu M, Arif MK, Chen D, Prasanth R, Lin YC, Olalaye G, Prasanth KV, Prasanth SG. Phosphorylation of Orc6 During Mitosis Regulates DNA Replication and Ribosome Biogenesis. Mol Cell Biol 2024; 44:289-301. [PMID: 38867464 PMCID: PMC11253883 DOI: 10.1080/10985549.2024.2356880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024] Open
Abstract
The human Origin Recognition Complex (ORC) is required not only for the initiation of DNA replication, but is also implicated in diverse cellular functions, including chromatin organization, centrosome biology, and cytokinesis. The smallest subunit of ORC, Orc6, is poorly conserved amongst eukaryotes. Recent studies from our laboratory have suggested that human Orc6 is not required for replication licensing, but is needed for S-phase progression. Further, ATR-dependent phosphorylation of Orc6 at T229 is implicated in DNA damage response during S-phase. In this study, we demonstrate that the CDK-dependent phosphorylation of Orc6 at T195 occurs during mitosis. While the phosphorylation at T195 does not seem to be required to exit mitosis, cells expressing the phosphomimetic T195E mutant of Orc6 impede S-phase progression. Moreover, the phosphorylated form of Orc6 associates with ORC more robustly, and Orc6 shows enhanced association with the ORC outside of G1, supporting the view that Orc6 may prevent the role of Orc1-5 in licensing outside of G1. Finally, Orc6 and the phosphorylated Orc6 localize to the nucleolar organizing centers and regulate ribosome biogenesis. Our results suggest that phosphorylated Orc6 at T195 prevents replication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fredy Kurniawan
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, USA
| | - Arindam Chakraborty
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, USA
| | - Humayra Z. Oishi
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, USA
| | - Minxue Liu
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, USA
| | - Mariam K. Arif
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, USA
| | - David Chen
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Yo-Chuen Lin
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, USA
| | - Godwin Olalaye
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, USA
| | - Kannanganattu V. Prasanth
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, USA
- Cancer Center, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, USA
| | - Supriya G. Prasanth
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, USA
- Cancer Center, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yan THK, Wu Z, Kwok ACM, Wong JTY. Knockdown of Dinoflagellate Condensin CcSMC4 Subunit Leads to S-Phase Impediment and Decompaction of Liquid Crystalline Chromosomes. Microorganisms 2020; 8:microorganisms8040565. [PMID: 32295294 PMCID: PMC7232253 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8040565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2020] [Revised: 03/30/2020] [Accepted: 04/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Dinoflagellates have some of the largest genomes, and their liquid-crystalline chromosomes (LCCs) have high degrees of non-nucleosomal superhelicity with cation-mediated DNA condensation. It is currently unknown if condensins, pentameric protein complexes containing structural maintenance of chromosomes 2/4, commonly involved in eukaryotic chromosomes condensation in preparation for M phase, may be involved in the LCC structure. We find that CcSMC4p (dinoflagellate SMC4 homolog) level peaked at S/G2 phase, even though LCCs do not undergo global-decondensation for replication. Despite the differences in the chromosomal packaging system, heterologous CcSMC4p expression suppressed conditional lethality of the corresponding fission yeast mutant, suggesting conservation of some canonical condensin functions. CcSMC4p-knockdown led to sustained expression of the S-phase marker PCNAp, S-phase impediment, and distorted nuclei in the early stage of CcSMC4p depletion. Prolonged CcSMC4p-knockdown resulted in aneuploidal cells and nuclear swelling with increasing LCC decompaction-decondensation. Cumulatively, our data suggested CcSMC4p function was required for dinoflagellate S-phase progression, and we propose that condensin-mediated higher-order compaction provisioning is involved in the provision of local rigidity for the replisome.
Collapse
|
3
|
Parker MW, Botchan MR, Berger JM. Mechanisms and regulation of DNA replication initiation in eukaryotes. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 2017; 52:107-144. [PMID: 28094588 DOI: 10.1080/10409238.2016.1274717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 130] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Cellular DNA replication is initiated through the action of multiprotein complexes that recognize replication start sites in the chromosome (termed origins) and facilitate duplex DNA melting within these regions. In a typical cell cycle, initiation occurs only once per origin and each round of replication is tightly coupled to cell division. To avoid aberrant origin firing and re-replication, eukaryotes tightly regulate two events in the initiation process: loading of the replicative helicase, MCM2-7, onto chromatin by the origin recognition complex (ORC), and subsequent activation of the helicase by its incorporation into a complex known as the CMG. Recent work has begun to reveal the details of an orchestrated and sequential exchange of initiation factors on DNA that give rise to a replication-competent complex, the replisome. Here, we review the molecular mechanisms that underpin eukaryotic DNA replication initiation - from selecting replication start sites to replicative helicase loading and activation - and describe how these events are often distinctly regulated across different eukaryotic model organisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew W Parker
- a Department of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry , Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore , MD , USA
| | - Michael R Botchan
- b Department of Molecular and Cell Biology , University of California Berkeley , Berkeley , CA , USA
| | - James M Berger
- a Department of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry , Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore , MD , USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Plasma membrane/cell wall perturbation activates a novel cell cycle checkpoint during G1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016; 113:6910-5. [PMID: 27274080 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1523824113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Cellular wound healing or the repair of plasma membrane/cell wall damage (plasma membrane damage) occurs frequently in nature. Although various cellular perturbations, such as DNA damage, spindle misalignment, and impaired daughter cell formation, are monitored by cell cycle checkpoint mechanisms in budding yeast, whether plasma membrane damage is monitored by any of these checkpoints remains to be addressed. Here, we define the mechanism by which cells sense membrane damage and inhibit DNA replication. We found that the inhibition of DNA replication upon plasma membrane damage requires GSK3/Mck1-dependent degradation of Cdc6, a component of the prereplicative complex. Furthermore, the CDK inhibitor Sic1 is stabilized in response to plasma membrane damage, leading to cell integrity maintenance in parallel with the Mck1-Cdc6 pathway. Cells defective in both Cdc6 degradation and Sic1 stabilization failed to grow in the presence of plasma membrane damage. Taking these data together, we propose that plasma membrane damage triggers G1 arrest via Cdc6 degradation and Sic1 stabilization to promote the cellular wound healing process.
Collapse
|
5
|
Deshmukh AS, Agarwal M, Dhar SK. Regulation of DNA replication proteins in parasitic protozoans: possible role of CDK-like kinases. Curr Genet 2016; 62:481-6. [PMID: 26780367 DOI: 10.1007/s00294-015-0562-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2015] [Revised: 12/26/2015] [Accepted: 12/28/2015] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Regulatory roles of CDKs in fundamental processes including cell cycle progression and transcription are well conserved in metazoans. This family of proteins has undergone significant evolutionary divergence and specialization. Several CDK-like kinases have been identified and characterized in parasitic protozoans. However, clear functional role and physiological relevance of these proteins in protozoans still remain elusive. In continuation with the recent finding that CDK-like protein PfPK5 regulates important DNA replication protein like origin recognition complex subunit 1 in Plasmodium falciparum, here we have discussed the emerging significance of CDK1/2 homologs in DNA replication of parasitic protozoans. In fact, involvement of these proteins in crucial cellular processes projects them as potential drug targets. The possibilities that CDKs offer as potential therapeutic targets in controlling parasite progression have also been explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Meetu Agarwal
- Special Centre for Molecular Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India
| | - Suman Kumar Dhar
- Special Centre for Molecular Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Deshmukh AS, Agarwal M, Mehra P, Gupta A, Gupta N, Doerig CD, Dhar SK. Regulation of Plasmodium falciparum Origin Recognition Complex subunit 1 (PfORC1) function through phosphorylation mediated by CDK-like kinase PK5. Mol Microbiol 2015; 98:17-33. [PMID: 26094711 DOI: 10.1111/mmi.13099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/18/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Plasmodium falciparum Origin Recognition Complex subunit 1 (PfORC1) has been implicated in DNA replication and var gene regulation. While the C-terminus is involved in DNA replication, the specific role of N-terminus has been suggested in var gene regulation in a Sir2-dependent manner. PfORC1 is localized at the nuclear periphery, where the clustering of chromosomal ends at the early stage of parasite development may be crucial for the regulation of subtelomeric var gene expression. Upon disassembly of telomeric clusters at later stages of parasite development, ORC1 is distributed in the nucleus and parasite cytoplasm where it may be required for its other cellular functions including DNA replication. The level of ORC1 decreases dramatically at the late schizont stage. The mechanisms that mediate regulation of PfORC1 function are largely unknown. Here we show, by the use of recombinant proteins and of transgenic parasites expressing wild type or mutant forms of ORC1, that phosphorylation of the PfORC1-N terminal domain by the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) PfPK5 abolishes DNA-binding activity and leads to changes in subcellular localization and proteasome-mediated degradation of the protein in schizonts. These results reveal that PfORC1 phosphorylation by a CDK is central to the regulation of important biological functions like DNA replication and var gene silencing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhijit S Deshmukh
- Special Centre for Molecular Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.,National Institute of Animal Biotechnology, Hyderabad, India
| | - Meetu Agarwal
- Special Centre for Molecular Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India
| | - Parul Mehra
- Special Centre for Molecular Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India
| | - Ashish Gupta
- Special Centre for Molecular Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India
| | - Nidhi Gupta
- Special Centre for Molecular Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India
| | - Christian D Doerig
- Department of Microbiology, School of Biomedical sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Suman Kumar Dhar
- Special Centre for Molecular Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lee KY, Bae JS, Yoon S, Hwang DS. Dephosphorylation of Orc2 by protein phosphatase 1 promotes the binding of the origin recognition complex to chromatin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2014; 448:385-9. [PMID: 24792176 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.04.109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2014] [Accepted: 04/22/2014] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Phosphorylation of Orc2, one of the six subunits of the origin recognition complex (ORC), by cyclin A/CDK2 during S phase leads to the dissociation of Orc2, Orc3, Orc4, and Orc5 subunits (Orc2-5) from human chromatin and replication origins. Dephosphorylation of the phosphorylated Orc2 by protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) is accompanied by the binding of the dissociated subunits to chromatin. Here we show that PP1 physically interacts with Orc2. The binding of PP1 to Orc2 and the dephosphorylation of Orc2 by PP1 occurred in a cell cycle-dependent manner through an interaction with 119-KSVSF-123, which is the consensus motif for the binding of PP1, of Orc2. The dephosphorylation of Orc2 by PP1 is required for the binding of Orc2 to chromatin. These results support that PP1 dephosphorylates Orc2 to promote the binding of ORC to chromatin and replication origins for the subsequent round of the cell cycle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyung Yong Lee
- Department of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Republic of Korea
| | - June Sung Bae
- Department of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Republic of Korea
| | - Sangwook Yoon
- Department of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Republic of Korea
| | - Deog Su Hwang
- Department of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
DNA replication is tightly controlled in eukaryotic cells to ensure that an exact copy of the genetic material is inherited by both daughter cells. Oscillating waves of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) and anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) activities provide a binary switch that permits the replication of each chromosome exactly once per cell cycle. Work from several organisms has revealed a conserved strategy whereby inactive replication complexes are assembled onto DNA during periods of low CDK and high APC activity but are competent to execute genome duplication only when these activities are reversed. Periods of high CDK and low APC/C serve an essential function by blocking reassembly of replication complexes, thereby preventing rereplication. Higher eukaryotes have evolved additional CDK-independent mechanisms for preventing rereplication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khalid Siddiqui
- Cancer Research UK, London Research Institute, Clare Hall Laboratories, South Mimms, Herts EN6 3LD, United Kingdom
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pease BN, Huttlin EL, Jedrychowski MP, Talevich E, Harmon J, Dillman T, Kannan N, Doerig C, Chakrabarti R, Gygi SP, Chakrabarti D. Global analysis of protein expression and phosphorylation of three stages of Plasmodium falciparum intraerythrocytic development. J Proteome Res 2013; 12:4028-45. [PMID: 23914800 DOI: 10.1021/pr400394g] [Citation(s) in RCA: 131] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
During asexual intraerythrocytic development, Plasmodium falciparum diverges from the paradigm of the eukaryotic cell cycles by undergoing multiple rounds of DNA replication and nuclear division without cytokinesis. A better understanding of the molecular switches that coordinate a myriad of events for the progression of the parasite through the intraerythrocytic developmental stages will be of fundamental importance for rational design of intervention strategies. To achieve this goal, we performed isobaric tag-based quantitative proteomics and phosphoproteomics analyses of three developmental stages in the Plasmodium asexual cycle and identified 2767 proteins, 1337 phosphoproteins, and 6293 phosphorylation sites. Approximately 34% of identified proteins and 75% of phosphorylation sites exhibit changes in abundance as the intraerythrocytic cycle progresses. Our study identified 43 distinct phosphorylation motifs and a range of potential MAPK/CDK substrates. Further analysis of phosphorylated kinases identified 30 protein kinases with 126 phosphorylation sites within the kinase domain or in N- or C-terminal tails. Many of these phosphorylations are likely CK2-mediated. We define the constitutive and regulated expression of the Plasmodium proteome during the intraerythrocytic developmental cycle, offering an insight into the dynamics of phosphorylation during asexual cycle progression. Our system-wide comprehensive analysis is a major step toward defining kinase-substrate pairs operative in various signaling networks in the parasite.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany N Pease
- Burnett School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida 32826, United States
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
One of the fundamental challenges facing the cell is to accurately copy its genetic material to daughter cells. When this process goes awry, genomic instability ensues in which genetic alterations ranging from nucleotide changes to chromosomal translocations and aneuploidy occur. Organisms have developed multiple mechanisms that can be classified into two major classes to ensure the fidelity of DNA replication. The first class includes mechanisms that prevent premature initiation of DNA replication and ensure that the genome is fully replicated once and only once during each division cycle. These include cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)-dependent mechanisms and CDK-independent mechanisms. Although CDK-dependent mechanisms are largely conserved in eukaryotes, higher eukaryotes have evolved additional mechanisms that seem to play a larger role in preventing aberrant DNA replication and genome instability. The second class ensures that cells are able to respond to various cues that continuously threaten the integrity of the genome by initiating DNA-damage-dependent "checkpoints" and coordinating DNA damage repair mechanisms. Defects in the ability to safeguard against aberrant DNA replication and to respond to DNA damage contribute to genomic instability and the development of human malignancy. In this article, we summarize our current knowledge of how genomic instability arises, with a particular emphasis on how the DNA replication process can give rise to such instability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarek Abbas
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hua H, Namdar M, Ganier O, Gregan J, Méchali M, Kearsey SE. Sequential steps in DNA replication are inhibited to ensure reduction of ploidy in meiosis. Mol Biol Cell 2013; 24:578-87. [PMID: 23303250 PMCID: PMC3583662 DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e12-11-0825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Reduction in ploidy in meiosis is assumed to be due to a block to the licensing step (Mcm helicase association with replication origins). When the licensing block is subverted, replication is still only partial due to inefficient elongation replication forks. This might constitute an additional level of replication regulation. Meiosis involves two successive rounds of chromosome segregation without an intervening S phase. Exit from meiosis I is distinct from mitotic exit, in that replication origins are not licensed by Mcm2-7 chromatin binding, but spindle disassembly occurs during a transient interphase-like state before meiosis II. The absence of licensing is assumed to explain the block to DNA replication, but this has not been formally tested. Here we attempt to subvert this block by expressing the licensing control factors Cdc18 and Cdt1 during the interval between meiotic nuclear divisions. Surprisingly, this leads only to a partial round of DNA replication, even when these factors are overexpressed and effect clear Mcm2-7 chromatin binding. Combining Cdc18 and Cdt1 expression with modulation of cyclin-dependent kinase activity, activation of Dbf4-dependent kinase, or deletion of the Spd1 inhibitor of ribonucleotide reductase has little additional effect on the extent of DNA replication. Single-molecule analysis indicates this partial round of replication results from inefficient progression of replication forks, and thus both initiation and elongation replication steps may be inhibited in late meiosis. In addition, DNA replication or damage during the meiosis I–II interval fails to arrest meiotic progress, suggesting absence of checkpoint regulation of meiosis II entry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Hua
- Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ikui AE, Rossio V, Schroeder L, Yoshida S. A yeast GSK-3 kinase Mck1 promotes Cdc6 degradation to inhibit DNA re-replication. PLoS Genet 2012; 8:e1003099. [PMID: 23236290 PMCID: PMC3516531 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2011] [Accepted: 10/01/2012] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Cdc6p is an essential component of the pre-replicative complex (pre-RC), which binds to DNA replication origins to promote initiation of DNA replication. Only once per cell cycle does DNA replication take place. After initiation, the pre-RC components are disassembled in order to prevent re-replication. It has been shown that the N-terminal region of Cdc6p is targeted for degradation after phosphorylation by Cyclin Dependent Kinase (CDK). Here we show that Mck1p, a yeast homologue of GSK-3 kinase, is also required for Cdc6 degradation through a distinct mechanism. Cdc6 is an unstable protein and is accumulated in the nucleus only during G1 and early S-phase in wild-type cells. In mck1 deletion cells, CDC6p is stabilized and accumulates in the nucleus even in late S phase and mitosis. Overexpression of Mck1p induces rapid Cdc6p degradation in a manner dependent on Threonine-368, a GSK-3 phosphorylation consensus site, and SCF(CDC4). We show evidence that Mck1p-dependent degradation of Cdc6 is required for prevention of DNA re-replication. Loss of Mck1 activity results in synthetic lethality with other pre-RC mutants previously implicated in re-replication control, and these double mutant strains over-replicate DNA within a single cell cycle. These results suggest that a GSK3 family protein plays an unexpected role in preventing DNA over-replication through Cdc6 degradation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We propose that both CDK and Mck1 kinases are required for Cdc6 degradation to ensure a tight control of DNA replication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy E Ikui
- Department of Biology, Brooklyn College, The City University of New York, Brooklyn, New York, United States of America.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gidvani RD, Sudmant P, Li G, DaSilva LF, McConkey BJ, Duncker BP, Ingalls BP. A quantitative model of the initiation of DNA replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae predicts the effects of system perturbations. BMC SYSTEMS BIOLOGY 2012; 6:78. [PMID: 22738223 PMCID: PMC3439281 DOI: 10.1186/1752-0509-6-78] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2012] [Accepted: 06/05/2012] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background Eukaryotic cell proliferation involves DNA replication, a tightly regulated process mediated by a multitude of protein factors. In budding yeast, the initiation of replication is facilitated by the heterohexameric origin recognition complex (ORC). ORC binds to specific origins of replication and then serves as a scaffold for the recruitment of other factors such as Cdt1, Cdc6, the Mcm2-7 complex, Cdc45 and the Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase complex. While many of the mechanisms controlling these associations are well documented, mathematical models are needed to explore the network’s dynamic behaviour. We have developed an ordinary differential equation-based model of the protein-protein interaction network describing replication initiation. Results The model was validated against quantified levels of protein factors over a range of cell cycle timepoints. Using chromatin extracts from synchronized Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cultures, we were able to monitor the in vivo fluctuations of several of the aforementioned proteins, with additional data obtained from the literature. The model behaviour conforms to perturbation trials previously reported in the literature, and accurately predicts the results of our own knockdown experiments. Furthermore, we successfully incorporated our replication initiation model into an established model of the entire yeast cell cycle, thus providing a comprehensive description of these processes. Conclusions This study establishes a robust model of the processes driving DNA replication initiation. The model was validated against observed cell concentrations of the driving factors, and characterizes the interactions between factors implicated in eukaryotic DNA replication. Finally, this model can serve as a guide in efforts to generate a comprehensive model of the mammalian cell cycle in order to explore cancer-related phenotypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohan D Gidvani
- Department of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lee KY, Bang SW, Yoon SW, Lee SH, Yoon JB, Hwang DS. Phosphorylation of ORC2 protein dissociates origin recognition complex from chromatin and replication origins. J Biol Chem 2012; 287:11891-8. [PMID: 22334659 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m111.338467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
During the late M to the G(1) phase of the cell cycle, the origin recognition complex (ORC) binds to the replication origin, leading to the assembly of the prereplicative complex for subsequent initiation of eukaryotic chromosome replication. We found that the cell cycle-dependent phosphorylation of human ORC2, one of the six subunits of ORC, dissociates ORC2, -3, -4, and -5 (ORC2-5) subunits from chromatin and replication origins. Phosphorylation at Thr-116 and Thr-226 of ORC2 occurs by cyclin-dependent kinase during the S phase and is maintained until the M phase. Phosphorylation of ORC2 at Thr-116 and Thr-226 dissociated the ORC2-5 from chromatin. Consistent with this, the phosphomimetic ORC2 protein exhibited defective binding to replication origins as well as to chromatin, whereas the phosphodefective protein persisted in binding throughout the cell cycle. These results suggest that the phosphorylation of ORC2 dissociates ORC from chromatin and replication origins and inhibits binding of ORC to newly replicated DNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyung Yong Lee
- Department of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Song B, Liu XS, Liu X. Polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1): an Unexpected Player in DNA Replication. Cell Div 2012; 7:3. [PMID: 22309699 PMCID: PMC3359159 DOI: 10.1186/1747-1028-7-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2011] [Accepted: 02/06/2012] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Regulation of cell cycle progression is important for the maintenance of genome integrity, and Polo-like kinases (Plks) have been identified as key regulators of this process. It is well established that Polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) plays critical roles in mitosis but little is known about its functions at other stages of the cell cycle. Here we summarize the functions of Plk1 during DNA replication, focusing on the molecular events related to Origin Recognition Complex (ORC), the complex that is essential for the initiation of DNA replication. Within the context of Plk1 phosphorylation of Orc2, we also emphasize regulation of Orc2 in different organisms. This review is intended to provide some insight into how Plk1 coordinates DNA replication in S phase with chromosome segregation in mitosis, and orchestrates the cell cycle as a whole.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bing Song
- Department of Biochemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Raman K, Wagner A. Evolvability and robustness in a complex signalling circuit. MOLECULAR BIOSYSTEMS 2011; 7:1081-92. [PMID: 21225054 DOI: 10.1039/c0mb00165a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Biological systems at various levels of organisation exhibit robustness, as well as phenotypic variability or evolvability, the ability to evolve novel phenotypes. We still know very little about the relationship between robustness and phenotypic variability at levels of organisation beyond individual macromolecules, and especially for signalling circuits. Here, we examine multiple alternate topologies of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae target-of-rapamycin (TOR) signalling circuit, in order to understand the circuit's robustness and phenotypic variability. We consider each of the topological variants a genotype, a set of alternative interactions between TOR circuit components. Two genotypes are neighbours in genotype space if they can be reached from each other by a single small genetic change. Each genotype (topology) has a signalling phenotype, which we define via the concentration trajectories of key signalling molecules. We find that the circuits we study can produce almost 300 different phenotypes. The number of genotypes with a given phenotype varies very widely among these phenotypes. Some phenotypes have few associated genotypes. Others have many genotypes that form genotype networks extending far through genotype space. A minority of phenotypes accounts for the vast majority of genotypes. Importantly, we find that these phenotypes tend to have large genotype networks, greater robustness and a greater ability to produce novel phenotypes. Thus, over a broad range of phenotypic robustness, robustness facilitates phenotypic variability in our study system. Our observations show parallels to studies on macromolecules, suggesting that similar principles might govern robustness and phenotypic variability in biological systems. Our approach points a way towards mapping genotype spaces in complex circuitry, and it exposes some challenges such mapping faces.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karthik Raman
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Control of cell cycle progression by phosphorylation of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) substrates. Biosci Rep 2010; 30:243-55. [DOI: 10.1042/bsr20090171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The eukaryotic cell cycle is a fundamental evolutionarily conserved process that regulates cell division from simple unicellular organisms, such as yeast, through to higher multicellular organisms, such as humans. The cell cycle comprises several phases, including the S-phase (DNA synthesis phase) and M-phase (mitotic phase). During S-phase, the genetic material is replicated, and is then segregated into two identical daughter cells following mitotic M-phase and cytokinesis. The S- and M-phases are separated by two gap phases (G1 and G2) that govern the readiness of cells to enter S- or M-phase. Genetic and biochemical studies demonstrate that cell division in eukaryotes is mediated by CDKs (cyclin-dependent kinases). Active CDKs comprise a protein kinase subunit whose catalytic activity is dependent on association with a regulatory cyclin subunit. Cell-cycle-stage-dependent accumulation and proteolytic degradation of different cyclin subunits regulates their association with CDKs to control different stages of cell division. CDKs promote cell cycle progression by phosphorylating critical downstream substrates to alter their activity. Here, we will review some of the well-characterized CDK substrates to provide mechanistic insights into how these kinases control different stages of cell division.
Collapse
|
18
|
Rehman MA, Yankulov K. The dual role of autonomously replicating sequences as origins of replication and as silencers. Curr Genet 2009; 55:357-63. [PMID: 19633981 DOI: 10.1007/s00294-009-0265-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2009] [Revised: 07/10/2009] [Accepted: 07/11/2009] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Autonomously replicating sequences (ARSs) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae have been extensively characterized as both origins of DNA replication and as chromatin repressors/silencers. It has been conclusively shown that the origin and the silencer activities of ARS are substantially, but not entirely interchangeable and that they are modulated by position effects and chromatin environment. It remains unclear how these two quite divergent functions of ARS co-exist. This perspective focuses on recent advances, which have shown that slight differences in ARSs can modulate their affinity for origin recognition complex and their activity as silencers or origins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Attiq Rehman
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Beltrao P, Trinidad JC, Fiedler D, Roguev A, Lim WA, Shokat KM, Burlingame AL, Krogan NJ. Evolution of phosphoregulation: comparison of phosphorylation patterns across yeast species. PLoS Biol 2009; 7:e1000134. [PMID: 19547744 PMCID: PMC2691599 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 161] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2008] [Accepted: 05/12/2009] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Analysis of the phosphoproteomes and the gene interaction networks of divergent yeast species defines the relative contribution of changes in protein phosphorylation pathways to the generation of phenotypic diversity. The extent by which different cellular components generate phenotypic diversity is an ongoing debate in evolutionary biology that is yet to be addressed by quantitative comparative studies. We conducted an in vivo mass-spectrometry study of the phosphoproteomes of three yeast species (Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Candida albicans, and Schizosaccharomyces pombe) in order to quantify the evolutionary rate of change of phosphorylation. We estimate that kinase–substrate interactions change, at most, two orders of magnitude more slowly than transcription factor (TF)–promoter interactions. Our computational analysis linking kinases to putative substrates recapitulates known phosphoregulation events and provides putative evolutionary histories for the kinase regulation of protein complexes across 11 yeast species. To validate these trends, we used the E-MAP approach to analyze over 2,000 quantitative genetic interactions in S. cerevisiae and Sc. pombe, which demonstrated that protein kinases, and to a greater extent TFs, show lower than average conservation of genetic interactions. We propose therefore that protein kinases are an important source of phenotypic diversity. Natural selection at a population level requires phenotypic diversity, which at the molecular level arises by mutation of the genome of each individual. What kinds of changes at the level of the DNA are most important for the generation of phenotypic differences remains a fundamental question in evolutionary biology. One well-studied source of phenotypic diversity is mutation in gene regulatory regions that results in changes in gene expression, but what proportion of phenotypic diversity is due to such mutations is not entirely clear. We investigated the relative contribution to phenotypic diversity of mutations in protein-coding regions compared to mutations in gene regulatory sequences. Given the important regulatory role played by phosphorylation across biological systems, we focused on mutations in protein-coding regions that alter protein–protein interactions involved in the binding of kinases to their substrate proteins. We studied the evolution of this “phosphoregulation” by analyzing the in vivo complement of phosphorylated proteins (the “phosphoproteome”) in three highly diverged yeast species—the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the pathogenic yeast Candida albicans, and the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe—and integrating those data with existing data on thousands of known genetic interactions from S. cerevisiae and Sc. pombe. We show that kinase–substrate interactions are altered at a rate that is at most two orders of magnitude slower than the alteration of transcription factor (TF)–promoter interactions, whereas TFs and kinases both show a faster than average rate of functional divergence estimated by the cross-species analysis of genetic interactions. Our data provide a quantitative estimate of the relative frequencies of different kinds of functionally relevant mutations and demonstrate that, like mutations in gene regulatory regions, mutations that result in changes in kinase–substrate interactions are an important source of phenotypic diversity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Beltrao
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
- California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
- * E-mail: (PB); (NJK)
| | - Jonathan C. Trinidad
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Dorothea Fiedler
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Assen Roguev
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
- California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Wendell A. Lim
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
- Cell Propulsion Laboratory (a National Institutes of Health Nanomedicine Development Center), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Kevan M. Shokat
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Alma L. Burlingame
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Nevan J. Krogan
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
- California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
- * E-mail: (PB); (NJK)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Rampakakis E, Arvanitis DN, Di Paola D, Zannis-Hadjopoulos M. Metazoan origins of DNA replication: regulation through dynamic chromatin structure. J Cell Biochem 2009; 106:512-20. [PMID: 19173303 DOI: 10.1002/jcb.22070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
DNA replication in eukaryotes is initiated at multiple replication origins distributed over the entire genome, which are normally activated once per cell cycle. Due to the complexity of the metazoan genome, the study of metazoan replication origins and their activity profiles has been less advanced than in simpler genome systems. DNA replication in eukaryotes involves many protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions, occurring in multiple stages. As in prokaryotes, control over the timing and frequency of initiation is exerted at the initiation site. A prerequisite for understanding the regulatory mechanisms of eukaryotic DNA replication is the identification and characterization of the cis-acting sequences that serve as replication origins and the trans-acting factors (proteins) that interact with them. Furthermore, in order to understand how DNA replication may become deregulated in malignant cells, the distinguishing features between normal and malignant origins of DNA replication as well as the proteins that interact with them must be determined. Based on advances that were made using simple genome model systems, several proteins involved in DNA replication have been identified. This review summarizes the current findings about metazoan origins of DNA replication and their interacting proteins as well as the role of chromatin structure in their regulation. Furthermore, progress in origin identification and isolation procedures as well as potential mechanisms to inhibit their activation in cancer development and progression are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Rampakakis
- Department of Biochemistry, Goodman Cancer Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Shultz RW, Lee TJ, Allen GC, Thompson WF, Hanley-Bowdoin L. Dynamic localization of the DNA replication proteins MCM5 and MCM7 in plants. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY 2009; 150:658-69. [PMID: 19357199 PMCID: PMC2689970 DOI: 10.1104/pp.109.136614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2009] [Accepted: 04/02/2009] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Genome integrity in eukaryotes depends on licensing mechanisms that prevent loading of the minichromosome maintenance complex (MCM2-7) onto replicated DNA during S phase. Although the principle of licensing appears to be conserved across all eukaryotes, the mechanisms that control it vary, and it is not clear how licensing is regulated in plants. In this work, we demonstrate that subunits of the MCM2-7 complex are coordinately expressed during Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) development and are abundant in proliferating and endocycling tissues, indicative of a role in DNA replication. We show that endogenous MCM5 and MCM7 proteins are localized in the nucleus during G1, S, and G2 phases of the cell cycle and are released into the cytoplasmic compartment during mitosis. We also show that MCM5 and MCM7 are topologically constrained on DNA and that the MCM complex is stable under high-salt conditions. Our results are consistent with a conserved replicative helicase function for the MCM complex in plants but not with the idea that plants resemble budding yeast by actively exporting the MCM complex from the nucleus to prevent unauthorized origin licensing and rereplication during S phase. Instead, our data show that, like other higher eukaryotes, the MCM complex in plants remains in the nucleus throughout most of the cell cycle and is only dispersed in mitotic cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Randall W Shultz
- Department of Molecular and Structural Biochemistry , North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7651, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Clarey MG, Botchan M, Nogales E. Single particle EM studies of the Drosophila melanogaster origin recognition complex and evidence for DNA wrapping. J Struct Biol 2008; 164:241-9. [PMID: 18824234 PMCID: PMC2640233 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2008.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2008] [Revised: 08/13/2008] [Accepted: 08/15/2008] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Hyperphosphorylation of the Drosophila melanogaster origin recognition complex (DmORC) by cyclin dependent kinases (CDKs) allows nucleotide binding but inhibits the ATPase activity of Orc1, and ablates the ATP-dependent interaction of ORC with DNA. Here we present single particle electron microscopy (EM) studies of ORC bound to nucleotide in both the dephosphorylated and hyper-phosphorylated states. 3D image reconstructions show that nucleotide binding gives rise to an analogous conformation independent of phosphorylation state. At the intermediate resolution achieved in our studies, ATP promotes changes along the toroidal core of the complex with negligible differences contributed by phosphorylation. Thus, hyperphosphorylation of DmORC does not induce meso-scale rearrangement of the ORC structure. To better understand ORC's role in origin remodeling, we performed atomic force microscopy (AFM) studies that show the contour length of a 688bp linear DNA fragment shortens by the equivalent of approximately 130bp upon ORC binding. This data, coupled with previous studies that showed a linking number change in circular DNA upon ORC binding, suggests that ORC may wrap the DNA in a manner akin to DnaA. Based on existing data and our structures, we propose a subunit arrangement for the AAA+ and winged helix domains, and in addition, speculate on a path of the 133bp of DNA around the ORC complex.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan G Clarey
- Molecular & Cell Biology Department, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Nielsen O, Løbner-Olesen A. Once in a lifetime: strategies for preventing re-replication in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. EMBO Rep 2008; 9:151-6. [PMID: 18246107 DOI: 10.1038/sj.embor.2008.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2007] [Accepted: 01/03/2008] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
DNA replication is an extremely accurate process and cells have evolved intricate control mechanisms to ensure that each region of their genome is replicated only once during S phase. Here, we compare what is known about the processes that prevent re-replication in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells by using the model organisms Escherichia coli and Schizosaccharomyces pombe as examples. Although the underlying molecular details are different, the logic behind the control mechanisms is similar. For example, after initiation, crucial molecules required for the loading of replicative helicases in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes are inactivated until the next cell cycle. Furthermore, in both systems the beta-clamp of the replicative polymerase associates with enzymatic activities that contribute to the inactivation of the helicase loaders. Finally, recent studies suggest that the control mechanism that prevents re-replication in both systems also increases the synthesis of DNA building blocks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olaf Nielsen
- Department of Molecular Biology, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, DK-2200 Copenhagen K, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Devault A, Gueydon E, Schwob E. Interplay between S-cyclin-dependent kinase and Dbf4-dependent kinase in controlling DNA replication through phosphorylation of yeast Mcm4 N-terminal domain. Mol Biol Cell 2008; 19:2267-77. [PMID: 18321994 DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e07-06-0614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Cyclin-dependent (CDK) and Dbf4-dependent (DDK) kinases trigger DNA replication in all eukaryotes, but how these kinases cooperate to regulate DNA synthesis is largely unknown. Here, we show that budding yeast Mcm4 is phosphorylated in vivo during S phase in a manner dependent on the presence of five CDK phosphoacceptor residues within the N-terminal domain of Mcm4. Mutation to alanine of these five sites (mcm4-5A) abolishes phosphorylation and decreases replication origin firing efficiency at 22 degrees C. Surprisingly, the loss of function mcm4-5A mutation confers cold and hydroxyurea sensitivity to DDK gain of function conditions (mcm5/bob1 mutation or DDK overexpression), implying that phosphorylation of Mcm4 by CDK somehow counteracts negative effects produced by ectopic DDK activation. Deletion of the S phase cyclins Clb5,6 is synthetic lethal with mcm4-5A and mimics its effects on DDK up mutants. Furthermore, we find that Clb5 expressed late in the cell cycle can still suppress the lethality of clb5,6Delta bob1 cells, whereas mitotic cyclins Clb2, 3, or 4 expressed early cannot. We propose that the N-terminal extension of eukaryotic Mcm4 integrates regulatory inputs from S-CDK and DDK, which may play an important role for the proper assembly or stabilization of replisome-progression complexes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alain Devault
- Institut de Génétique Moléculaire de Montpellier, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unité Mixte de Recherche 5535, Institut Fédératif de Recherche 122, 34293 Montpellier, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Mickle KL, Oliva A, Huberman JA, Leatherwood J. Checkpoint effects and telomere amplification during DNA re-replication in fission yeast. BMC Mol Biol 2007; 8:119. [PMID: 18154680 PMCID: PMC2265721 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2199-8-119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2007] [Accepted: 12/21/2007] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although much is known about molecular mechanisms that prevent re-initiation of DNA replication on newly replicated DNA during a single cell cycle, knowledge is sparse regarding the regions that are most susceptible to re-replication when those mechanisms are bypassed and regarding the extents to which checkpoint pathways modulate re-replication. We used microarrays to learn more about these issues in wild-type and checkpoint-mutant cells of the fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Results We found that over-expressing a non-phosphorylatable form of the replication-initiation protein, Cdc18 (known as Cdc6 in other eukaryotes), drove re-replication of DNA sequences genome-wide, rather than forcing high level amplification of just a few sequences. Moderate variations in extents of re-replication generated regions spanning hundreds of kilobases that were amplified (or not) ~2-fold more (or less) than average. However, these regions showed little correlation with replication origins used during S phase. The extents and locations of amplified regions in cells deleted for the checkpoint genes encoding Rad3 (ortholog of human ATR and budding yeast Mec1) and Cds1 (ortholog of human Chk2 and budding yeast Rad53) were similar to those in wild-type cells. Relatively minor but distinct effects, including increased re-replication of heterochromatic regions, were found specifically in cells lacking Rad3. These might be due to Cds1-independent roles for Rad3 in regulating re-replication and/or due to the fact that cells lacking Rad3 continued to divide during re-replication, unlike wild-type cells or cells lacking Cds1. In both wild-type and checkpoint-mutant cells, regions near telomeres were particularly susceptible to re-replication. Highly re-replicated telomere-proximal regions (50–100 kb) were, in each case, followed by some of the least re-replicated DNA in the genome. Conclusion The origins used, and the extent of replication fork progression, during re-replication are largely independent of the replication and DNA-damage checkpoint pathways mediated by Cds1 and Rad3. The fission yeast pattern of telomere-proximal amplification adjacent to a region of under-replication has also been seen in the distantly-related budding yeast, which suggests that subtelomeric sequences may be a promising place to look for DNA re-replication in other organisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie L Mickle
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, SUNY at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York 11794-5222, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Regulatory evolution in proteins by turnover and lineage-specific changes of cyclin-dependent kinase consensus sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007; 104:17713-8. [PMID: 17978194 PMCID: PMC2077061 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0700997104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Evolutionary change in gene regulation is a key mechanism underlying the genetic component of organismal diversity. Here, we study evolution of regulation at the posttranslational level by examining the evolution of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) consensus phosphorylation sites in the protein subunits of the pre-replicative complex (RC). The pre-RC, an assembly of proteins formed during an early stage of DNA replication, is believed to be regulated by CDKs throughout the animals and fungi. Interestingly, although orthologous pre-RC components often contain clusters of CDK consensus sites, the positions and numbers of sites do not seem conserved. By analyzing protein sequences from both distantly and closely related species, we confirm that consensus sites can turn over rapidly even when the local cluster of sites is preserved, consistent with the notion that precise positioning of phosphorylation events is not required for regulation. We also identify evolutionary changes in the clusters of sites and further examine one replication protein, Mcm3, where a cluster of consensus sites near a nucleocytoplasmic transport signal is confined to a specific lineage. We show that the presence or absence of the cluster of sites in different species is associated with differential regulation of the transport signal. These findings suggest that the CDK regulation of MCM nuclear localization was acquired in the lineage leading to Saccharomyces cerevisiae after the divergence with Candida albicans. Our results begin to explore the dynamics of regulatory evolution at the posttranslational level and show interesting similarities to recent observations of regulatory evolution at the level of transcription.
Collapse
|
27
|
Zellner E, Herrmann T, Schulz C, Grummt F. Site-specific interaction of the murine pre-replicative complex with origin DNA: assembly and disassembly during cell cycle transit and differentiation. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:6701-13. [PMID: 17916579 PMCID: PMC2175324 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkm555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Eukaryotic DNA replication initiates at origins of replication by the assembly of the highly conserved pre-replicative complex (pre-RC). However, exact sequences for pre-RC binding still remain unknown. By chromatin immunoprecipitation we identified in vivo a pre-RC-binding site within the origin of bidirectional replication in the murine rDNA locus. At this sequence, ORC1, -2, -4 and -5 are bound in G1 phase and at the G1/S transition. During S phase, ORC1 is released. An ATP-dependent and site-specific assembly of the pre-RC at origin DNA was demonstrated in vitro using partially purified murine pre-RC proteins in electrophoretic mobility shift assays. By deletion experiments the sequence required for pre-RC binding was confined to 119 bp. Nucleotide substitutions revealed that two 9 bp sequence elements, CTCGGGAGA, are essential for the binding of pre-RC proteins to origin DNA within the murine rDNA locus. During myogenic differentiation of C2C12 cells, we demonstrated a reduction of ORC1 and ORC2 by immunoblot analyses. ChIP analyses revealed that ORC1 completely disappears from chromatin of terminally differentiated myotubes, whereas ORC2, -4 and -5 still remain associated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth Zellner
- Institute of Biochemistry, Biocenter at the University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, D-97074 Würzburg, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Arias EE, Walter JC. Strength in numbers: preventing rereplication via multiple mechanisms in eukaryotic cells. Genes Dev 2007; 21:497-518. [PMID: 17344412 DOI: 10.1101/gad.1508907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 313] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
In eukaryotic cells, prereplication complexes (pre-RCs) are assembled on chromatin in the G1 phase, rendering origins of DNA replication competent to initiate DNA synthesis. When DNA replication commences in S phase, pre-RCs are disassembled, and multiple initiations from the same origin do not occur because new rounds of pre-RC assembly are inhibited. In most experimental organisms, multiple mechanisms that prevent pre-RC assembly have now been identified, and rereplication within the same cell cycle can be induced through defined perturbations of these mechanisms. This review summarizes the diverse array of inhibitory pathways used by different organisms to prevent pre-RC assembly, and focuses on the challenge of understanding how in any one cell type, various mechanisms cooperate to strictly enforce once per cell cycle regulation of DNA replication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily E Arias
- Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, 240 Longwood Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Legouras I, Xouri G, Dimopoulos S, Lygeros J, Lygerou Z. DNA replication in the fission yeast: robustness in the face of uncertainty. Yeast 2007; 23:951-62. [PMID: 17072888 DOI: 10.1002/yea.1416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
DNA replication, the process of duplication of a cell's genetic content, must be carried out with great precision every time the cell divides, so that genetic information is preserved. Control mechanisms must ensure that every base of the genome is replicated within the allocated time (S-phase) and only once per cell cycle, thereby safeguarding genomic integrity. In eukaryotes, replication starts from many points along the chromosome, termed origins of replication, and then proceeds continuously bidirectionally until an opposing moving fork is encountered. In contrast to bacteria, where a specific site on the genome serves as an origin in every cell division, in most eukaryotes origin selection appears highly stochastic: many potential origins exist, of which only a subset is selected to fire in any given cell, giving rise to an apparently random distribution of initiation events across the genome. Origin states change throughout the cell cycle, through the ordered formation and modification of origin-associated multisubunit protein complexes. State transitions are governed by fluctuations of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) activity and guards in these transitions ensure system memory. We present here DNA replication dynamics, emphasizing recent data from the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, and discuss how robustness may be ensured in spite of (or even assisted by) system randomness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis Legouras
- School of Medicine, Laboratory of General Biology, University of Patras, Rio, Patras, Greece
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Honey S, Futcher B. Roles of the CDK phosphorylation sites of yeast Cdc6 in chromatin binding and rereplication. Mol Biol Cell 2007; 18:1324-36. [PMID: 17267692 PMCID: PMC1838967 DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e06-06-0544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cdc6 protein is crucial for DNA replication. In the absence of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) activity, Cdc6 binds to replication origins, and loads Mcm proteins. In the presence of CDK activity, Cdc6 does not bind to origins, and this helps prevent rereplication. CDK activity affects Cdc6 function by multiple mechanisms: CDK activity affects transcription of CDC6, degradation of Cdc6, nuclear import of Cdc6, and binding of Cdc6 to Clb2. Here we examine some of these mechanisms individually. We find that when Cdc6 is forced into the nucleus during late G1 or S, it will not substantially reload onto chromatin no matter whether its CDK sites are present or not. In contrast, at a G2/M nocodazole arrest, Cdc6 will reload onto chromatin if and only if its CDK sites have been removed. Trace amounts of nonphosphorylatable Cdc6 are dominant lethal in strains bearing nonphosphorylatable Orc2 and Orc6, apparently because of rereplication. This synthetic dominant lethality occurs even in strains with wild-type MCM genes. Nonphosphorylatable Cdc6, or Orc2 and Orc6, sensitize cells to rereplication caused by overexpression of various replication initiation proteins such as Dpb11 and Sld2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sangeet Honey
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-5222
| | - Bruce Futcher
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-5222
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
The origin recognition complex (ORC), a heteromeric six-subunit protein, is a central component for eukaryotic DNA replication. The ORC binds to DNA at replication origin sites in an ATP-dependent manner and serves as a scaffold for the assembly of other key initiation factors. Sequence rules for ORC-DNA binding appear to vary widely. In budding yeast the ORC recognizes specific ori elements, however, in higher eukaryotes origin site selection does not appear to depend on the specific DNA sequence. In metazoans, during cell cycle progression, one or more of the ORC subunits can be modified in such a way that ORC activity is inhibited until mitosis is complete and a nuclear membrane is assembled. In addition to its well-documented role in the initiation of DNA replication, the ORC is also involved in other cell functions. Some of these activities directly link cell cycle progression with DNA replication, while other functions seem distinct from replication. The function of ORCs in the establishment of transcriptionally repressed regions is described for many species and may be a conserved feature common for both unicellular eukaryotes and metazoans. ORC subunits were found at centrosomes, at the cell membranes, at the cytokinesis furrows of dividing cells, as well as at the kinetochore. The exact mechanism of these localizations remains to be determined, however, latest results support the idea that ORC proteins participate in multiple aspects of the chromosome inheritance cycle. In this review, we discuss the participation of ORC proteins in various cell functions, in addition to the canonical role of ORC in initiating DNA replication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Igor N Chesnokov
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Green BM, Morreale RJ, Ozaydin B, Derisi JL, Li JJ. Genome-wide mapping of DNA synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals that mechanisms preventing reinitiation of DNA replication are not redundant. Mol Biol Cell 2006; 17:2401-14. [PMID: 16481397 PMCID: PMC1446083 DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e05-11-1043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
To maintain genomic stability, reinitiation of eukaryotic DNA replication within a single cell cycle is blocked by multiple mechanisms that inactivate or remove replication proteins after G1 phase. Consistent with the prevailing notion that these mechanisms are redundant, we previously showed that simultaneous deregulation of three replication proteins, ORC, Cdc6, and Mcm2-7, was necessary to cause detectable bulk re-replication in G2/M phase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In this study, we used microarray comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) to provide a more comprehensive and detailed analysis of re-replication. This genome-wide analysis suggests that reinitiation in G2/M phase primarily occurs at a subset of both active and latent origins, but is independent of chromosomal determinants that specify the use and timing of these origins in S phase. We demonstrate that re-replication can be induced within S phase, but differs in amount and location from re-replication in G2/M phase, illustrating the dynamic nature of DNA replication controls. Finally, we show that very limited re-replication can be detected by microarray CGH when only two replication proteins are deregulated, suggesting that the mechanisms blocking re-replication are not redundant. Therefore we propose that eukaryotic re-replication at levels below current detection limits may be more prevalent and a greater source of genomic instability than previously appreciated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian M Green
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-2200, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Zhu W, Abbas T, Dutta A. DNA replication and genomic instability. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2006; 570:249-79. [PMID: 18727504 DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-3764-3_9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Wenge Zhu
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Li KG, Yang JS, Attia K, Su W, He GM, Qian XY. Cloning and characterization of OsORC2, a new member of rice origin recognition complex. Biotechnol Lett 2005; 27:1355-9. [PMID: 16215849 DOI: 10.1007/s10529-005-0937-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2005] [Accepted: 07/11/2005] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
In eukaryotic cells, the origin recognition complex (ORC) governs the initiation site of DNA replication and formation of the prereplication complex. The isolation, characterization and tissue-specific expression of a putative ORC subunit 2 (OsORC2) in Oryza sativa is described here. A novel cDNA fragment encoding rice ORC2 was isolated by screening the subtractive library, which had a higher expression level in inflorescence meristem than in shoot apical meristem. The full-length cDNA of rice ORC2 was obtained by the method of rapid amplification of cDNA ends, which contained an 1140 bp open reading frame encoding a 379 amino acid polypeptide. Sequence alignment shows that there is a high homology between the deduced amino sequence of OsORC2 and maize ORC2 (85%). The tissue-specific expression pattern of OsORC2 reveals that it is abundant in roots, seedling and inflorescence meristem, while its expression level is much lower in mature leaves and shoot.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ke-Gui Li
- Institute of Genetics, State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Blow JJ, Tanaka TU. The chromosome cycle: coordinating replication and segregation. Second in the cycles review series. EMBO Rep 2005; 6:1028-34. [PMID: 16264427 PMCID: PMC1371039 DOI: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2005] [Accepted: 08/25/2005] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
During the cell-division cycle, chromosomal DNA must initially be precisely duplicated and then correctly segregated to daughter cells. The accuracy of these two events is maintained by two interlinked cycles: the replication licensing cycle, which ensures precise duplication of DNA, and the cohesion cycle, which ensures correct segregation. Here we provide a general overview of how these two systems are coordinated to maintain genetic stability during the cell cycle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Julian Blow
- University of Dundee, Wellcome Trust Biocentre, Dow Street, Dundee DD1 5EH, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Remus D, Blanchette M, Rio DC, Botchan MR. CDK phosphorylation inhibits the DNA-binding and ATP-hydrolysis activities of the Drosophila origin recognition complex. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:39740-51. [PMID: 16188887 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m508515200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Faithful propagation of eukaryotic chromosomes usually requires that no DNA segment be replicated more than once during one cell cycle. Cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks) are critical for the re-replication controls that inhibit the activities of components of the pre-replication complexes (pre-RCs) following origin activation. The origin recognition complex (ORC) initiates the assembly of pre-RCs at origins of replication and Cdk phosphorylation of ORC is important for the prevention of re-initiation. Here we show that Drosophila melanogaster ORC (DmORC) is phosphorylated in vivo and is a substrate for Cdks in vitro. Cdk phosphorylation of DmORC subunits DmOrc1p and DmOrc2p inhibits the intrinsic ATPase activity of DmORC without affecting ATP binding to DmOrc1p. Moreover, Cdk phosphorylation inhibits the ATP-dependent DNA-binding activity of DmORC in vitro, thus identifying a novel determinant for DmORC-DNA interaction. DmORC is a substrate for both Cdk2 x cyclin E and Cdk1 x cyclin B in vitro. Such phosphorylation of DmORC by Cdk2 x cyclin E, but not by Cdk1 x cyclin B, requires an "RXL" motif in DmOrc1p. We also identify casein kinase 2 (CK2) as a kinase activity in embryonic extracts targeting DmORC for modification. CK2 phosphorylation does not affect ATP hydrolysis by DmORC but modulates the ATP-dependent DNA-binding activity of DmORC. These results suggest molecular mechanisms by which Cdks may inhibit ORC function as part of re-replication control and show that DmORC activity may be modulated in response to phosphorylation by multiple kinases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk Remus
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Division of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3204, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
May NR, Thomer M, Murnen KF, Calvi BR. Levels of the origin-binding protein Double parked and its inhibitor Geminin increase in response to replication stress. J Cell Sci 2005; 118:4207-17. [PMID: 16141238 DOI: 10.1242/jcs.02534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The regulation of a pre-replicative complex (pre-RC) at origins ensures that the genome is replicated only once per cell cycle. Cdt1 is an essential component of the pre-RC that is rapidly degraded at G1-S and also inhibited by Geminin (Gem) protein to prevent re-replication. We have previously shown that destruction of the Drosophila homolog of Cdt1, Double-parked (Dup), at G1-S is dependent upon cyclin-E/CDK2 and important to prevent re-replication and cell death. Dup is phosphorylated by cyclin-E/Cdk2, but this direct phosphorylation was not sufficient to explain the rapid destruction of Dup at G1-S. Here, we present evidence that it is DNA replication itself that triggers rapid Dup destruction. We find that a range of defects in DNA replication stabilize Dup protein and that this stabilization is not dependent on ATM/ATR checkpoint kinases. This response to replication stress was cell-type specific, with neuroblast stem cells of the larval brain having the largest increase in Dup protein. Defects at different steps in replication also increased Dup protein during an S-phase-like amplification cell cycle in the ovary, suggesting that Dup stabilization is sensitive to DNA replication and not an indirect consequence of a cell-cycle arrest. Finally, we find that cells with high levels of Dup also have elevated levels of Gem protein. We propose that, in cycling cells, Dup destruction is coupled to DNA replication and that increased levels of Gem balance elevated Dup levels to prevent pre-RC reformation when Dup degradation fails.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noah R May
- Department of Genetics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 415 Curie Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6145, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
To ensure its duplication, chromosomal DNA must be precisely duplicated in each cell cycle, with no sections left unreplicated, and no sections replicated more than once. Eukaryotic cells achieve this by dividing replication into two non-overlapping phases. During late mitosis and G1, replication origins are 'licensed' for replication by loading the minichromosome maintenance (Mcm) 2-7 proteins to form a pre-replicative complex. Mcm2-7 proteins are then essential for initiating and elongating replication forks during S phase. Recent data have provided biochemical and structural insight into the process of replication licensing and the mechanisms that regulate it during the cell cycle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Julian Blow
- Wellcome Trust Biocentre, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Sun N, Jang J, Lee S, Kim S, Lee S, Hoe KL, Chung KS, Kim DU, Yoo HS, Won M, Song KB. The first two-dimensional reference map of the fission yeast,Schizosaccharomyces pombe proteins. Proteomics 2005; 5:1574-9. [PMID: 15800968 DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200401053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Cytosolic proteins of Schizosaccharomyces pombe were separated by two-dimensional (2-D) gel electrophoresis, to construct the first 2-D reference map. In the pI range 4-7, more than 500 spots were detected by silver staining, and 70 different proteins corresponding to 111 spots were identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry and tandem mass spectrometry, where necessary. In the pI range 6-9, approximately 330 spots were detected, and 31 proteins corresponding to 38 spots were identified by mass spectrometry. More than 50% of the identified proteins were involved in amino acid, carbohydrate or nucleotide metabolism, and energy production. A second large group of identified proteins comprises heat shock and other stress related proteins and chaperones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Namkyu Sun
- Laboratory of Protein Chemistry, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, South Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Stillman B. Origin recognition and the chromosome cycle. FEBS Lett 2005; 579:877-84. [PMID: 15680967 DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 110] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2004] [Revised: 12/10/2004] [Accepted: 12/10/2004] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Prior to the initiation of DNA replication, chromosomes must establish a biochemical mark that permits the recruitment in S phase of the DNA replication machinery that copies DNA. The process of chromosome replication in eukaryotes also must be coordinated with segregation of the duplicated chromosomes to daughter cells during mitosis. Protein complexes that utilize ATP coordinate events at origins of DNA replication and later they participate in the initiation of DNA replication. In eukaryotes, some of these proteins also play a part in later processes that ensure accurate inheritance of chromosomes in mitosis, including spindle attachment of chromosomes, accurate duplication of centrosomes and cytokinesis. A perspective of how ATP-dependent proteins accomplish this task in eukaryotes is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruce Stillman
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1 Bungtown Road, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Saxena S, Dutta A. Geminin-Cdt1 balance is critical for genetic stability. Mutat Res 2005; 569:111-21. [PMID: 15603756 DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2004.05.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2004] [Accepted: 05/04/2004] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
A cell limits its DNA replication activity to once per cell division cycle to maintain its genomic integrity. Studies in a variety of organisms are elucidating how these controls are exercised. Key amongst these is the regulation of replication initiator proteins such as Cdt1. Cdt1 is present in cells in G1 phase where it is required for initiation of replication. Once origins have fired, Cdt1 is either exported out of the nucleus or degraded, thereby preventing another round of replication. Higher eukaryotes have evolved another redundant mechanism, an inhibitor called geminin, to restrain Cdt1 activity. Studies in multiple organisms have shown that unregulated Cdt1 activity stimulates overreplication of the genome. Interestingly, the same seems to be true when geminin is depleted. The imbalance in the activities of these proteins causes the activation of key checkpoint proteins, the ATM/ATR kinases and the tumor suppressor, p53. This review proposes that a balance between Cdt1 and geminin is important for maintaining genomic stability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandeep Saxena
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
Eukaryotic genomes are replicated from large numbers of replication origins distributed on multiple chromosomes. The activity of these origins must be coordinated so that the entire genome is efficiently and accurately replicated yet no region of the genome is ever replicated more than once. The past decade has seen significant advances in understanding how the initiation of DNA replication is regulated by key cell-cycle regulators, including the cyclin dependent kinases (CDKs) and the anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C). The assembly of essential prereplicative complexes (pre-RCs) at origins only occurs when CDK activity is low and APC/C activity is high. Origin firing, however, can only occur when the APC/C is inactivated and CDKs become active. This two step mechanism ensures that no origin can fire more than once in a cell cycle. In all eukaryotes tested, CDKs can contribute to the inhibition of pre-RC assembly. This inhibition is characterised both by high degrees of redundancy and evolutionary plasticity. Geminin plays a crucial role in inhibiting licensing in metazoans and, like cyclins, is inactivated by the APC/C. Strategies involved in preventing re-replication in different organisms will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John F X Diffley
- Cancer Research UK London Research Institute, Clare Hall Laboratories, South Mimms, Hertfordshire EN6 3LD, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Machida YJ, Dutta A. Cellular Checkpoint Mechanisms Monitoring Proper Initiation of DNA Replication. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:6253-6. [PMID: 15591064 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.r400037200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Yuichi J Machida
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Tsuyama T, Tada S, Watanabe S, Seki M, Enomoto T. Licensing for DNA replication requires a strict sequential assembly of Cdc6 and Cdt1 onto chromatin in Xenopus egg extracts. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33:765-75. [PMID: 15687385 PMCID: PMC548366 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gki226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Replication origins are licensed for a single initiation event by the loading of Mcm2-7 proteins during late mitosis and G1. Sequential associations of origin recognition complex, Cdc6 and Mcm2-7 are essential for completion of the licensing. Although Cdt1 also binds to the chromatin when the licensing reaction takes place, whether the binding is a requirement for Cdt1 to function is unclear. To analyze the relevance of the chromatin association of Cdt1, we carried out chromatin transfer experiments using either immunodepleted Xenopus egg extracts or purified proteins. Licensing assay and immunoblotting analyses indicated that Cdt1 could only license DNA replication and load Mcm2-7 onto DNA when it binds to chromatin that has already associated with Cdc6. These results provide evidence supporting that Cdc6 and Cdt1 must bind to chromatin in a strict order for DNA licensing to occur.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shusuke Tada
- To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +81 22 217 6876; Fax: +81 22 217 6873;
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Casper JM, Kemp MG, Ghosh M, Randall GM, Vaillant A, Leffak M. The c-myc DNA-unwinding element-binding protein modulates the assembly of DNA replication complexes in vitro. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:13071-83. [PMID: 15653697 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m404754200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
The presence of DNA-unwinding elements (DUEs) at eukaryotic replicators has raised the question of whether these elements contribute to origin activity by their intrinsic helical instability, as protein-binding sites, or both. We used the human c-myc DUE as bait in a yeast one-hybrid screen and identified a DUE-binding protein, designated DUE-B, with a predicted mass of 23.4 kDa. Based on homology to yeast proteins, DUE-B was previously classified as an aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase; however, the human protein is approximately 60 amino acids longer than its orthologs in yeast and worms and is primarily nuclear. In vivo, chromatin-bound DUE-B localized to the c-myc DUE region. DUE-B levels were constant during the cell cycle, although the protein was preferentially phosphorylated in cells arrested early in S phase. Inhibition of DUE-B protein expression slowed HeLa cell cycle progression from G1 to S phase and induced cell death. DUE-B extracted from HeLa cells or expressed from baculovirus migrated as a dimer during gel filtration and co-purified with ATPase activity. In contrast to endogenous DUE-B, baculovirus-expressed DUE-B efficiently formed high molecular mass complexes in Xenopus egg and HeLa extracts. In Xenopus extracts, baculovirus-expressed DUE-B inhibited chromatin replication and replication protein A loading in the presence of endogenous DUE-B, suggesting that differential covalent modification of these proteins can alter their effect on replication. Recombinant DUE-B expressed in HeLa cells restored replication activity to egg extracts immunodepleted with anti-DUE-B antibody, suggesting that DUE-B plays an important role in replication in vivo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John M Casper
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Wright State University School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio 45435, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Arias EE, Walter JC. Replication-dependent destruction of Cdt1 limits DNA replication to a single round per cell cycle in Xenopus egg extracts. Genes Dev 2004; 19:114-26. [PMID: 15598982 PMCID: PMC540230 DOI: 10.1101/gad.1255805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 163] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
In eukaryotes, prereplication complexes (pre-RCs) containing ORC, Cdc6, Cdt1, and MCM2-7 are assembled on chromatin in the G1 phase. In S phase, when DNA replication initiates, pre-RCs are disassembled, and new pre-RC assembly is restricted until the following G1 period. As a result, DNA replication is limited to a single round per cell cycle. One inhibitor of pre-RC assembly, geminin, was discovered in Xenopus, and it binds and inactivates Cdt1 in S phase. However, removal of geminin from Xenopus egg extracts is insufficient to cause rereplication, suggesting that other safeguards against rereplication exist. Here, we show that Cdt1 is completely degraded by ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis during the course of the first round of DNA replication in Xenopus egg extracts. Degradation depends on Cdk2/Cyclin E, Cdc45, RPA, and polymerase alpha, demonstrating a requirement for replication initiation. Cdt1 is ubiquitinated on chromatin, and this process also requires replication initiation. Once replication has initiated, Cdk2/Cyclin E is dispensable for Cdt1 degradation. When fresh Cdt1 is supplied after the first round of DNA replication, significant rereplication results, and rereplication is enhanced in the absence of geminin. Our results identify a replication-dependent proteolytic pathway that targets Cdt1 and that acts redundantly with geminin to inactivate Cdt1 in S phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily E Arias
- Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Green BM, Li JJ. Loss of rereplication control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae results in extensive DNA damage. Mol Biol Cell 2004; 16:421-32. [PMID: 15537702 PMCID: PMC539184 DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e04-09-0833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
To maintain genome stability, the entire genome of a eukaryotic cell must be replicated once and only once per cell cycle. In many organisms, multiple overlapping mechanisms block rereplication, but the consequences of deregulating these mechanisms are poorly understood. Here, we show that disrupting these controls in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae rapidly blocks cell proliferation. Rereplicating cells activate the classical DNA damage-induced checkpoint response, which depends on the BRCA1 C-terminus checkpoint protein Rad9. In contrast, Mrc1, a checkpoint protein required for recognition of replication stress, does not play a role in the response to rereplication. Strikingly, rereplicating cells accumulate subchromosomal DNA breakage products. These rapid and severe consequences suggest that even limited and sporadic rereplication could threaten the genome with significant damage. Hence, even subtle disruptions in the cell cycle regulation of DNA replication may predispose cells to the genomic instability associated with tumorigenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian M Green
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-2200, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Uchiyama M, Wang TSF. The B-subunit of DNA polymerase alpha-primase associates with the origin recognition complex for initiation of DNA replication. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24:7419-34. [PMID: 15314153 PMCID: PMC506996 DOI: 10.1128/mcb.24.17.7419-7434.2004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2004] [Revised: 04/28/2004] [Accepted: 06/07/2004] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The B-subunit (p70/Pol12p) of the DNA polymerase alpha-primase (Polalpha-primase) complex is thought to have a regulatory role in an early stage of S phase. We generated a panel of fission yeast thermosensitive mutants of the B-subunit (termed Spb70) to investigate its role in initiation of DNA replication by genetic and biochemical approaches. Here, we show that the fission yeast Spb70 genetically interacts and coprecipitates with origin recognition complex proteins Orp1/Orc1 and Orp2/Orc2 and primase coupling subunit Spp2/p58. A fraction of Spb70 associates with Orp2 on chromatin throughout the cell cycle independent of the other subunits of Polalpha-primase. Furthermore, primase Spp2/p58 subunit preferentially associates with the unphosphorylated Orp2, and the association requires Spb70. Mutations in orp2+ that abolish or mimic the Cdc2 phosphorylation of Orp2 suppress or exacerbate the thermosensitivity of the spb70 mutants, respectively, indicating that an unphosphorylated Orp2 promotes an Spb70-dependent replication event. Together, these results indicate that the chromatin-bound B-subunit in association with origin recognition complex mediates recruiting Polalpha-primase complex onto replication origins in G1 pre-Start through an interaction with primase Spp2/p58 subunit. Our results thus suggest a role for the recruited Polalpha-primase in the initiation of both leading and lagging strands at the replication origins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masashi Uchiyama
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, MED CTR R-272, Stanford, CA 94305-5324, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Thomer M, May NR, Aggarwal BD, Kwok G, Calvi BR. Drosophila double-parked is sufficient to induce re-replication during development and is regulated by cyclin E/CDK2. Development 2004; 131:4807-18. [PMID: 15342466 DOI: 10.1242/dev.01348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
It is important that chromosomes are duplicated only once per cell cycle. Over-replication is prevented by multiple mechanisms that block the reformation of a pre-replicative complex (pre-RC) onto origins in S and G2 phase. We have investigated the developmental regulation of Double-parked (Dup) protein, the Drosophila ortholog of Cdt1, a conserved and essential pre-RC component found in human and other organisms. We find that phosphorylation and degradation of Dup protein at G1/S requires cyclin E/CDK2. The N terminus of Dup, which contains ten potential CDK phosphorylation sites, is necessary and sufficient for Dup degradation during S phase of mitotic cycles and endocycles. Mutation of these ten phosphorylation sites, however, only partially stabilizes the protein, suggesting that multiple mechanisms ensure Dup degradation. This regulation is important because increased Dup protein is sufficient to induce profound rereplication and death of developing cells. Mis-expression has different effects on genomic replication than on developmental amplification from chorion origins. The C terminus alone has no effect on genomic replication, but it is better than full-length protein at stimulating amplification. Mutation of the Dup CDK sites increases genomic re-replication, but is dominant negative for amplification. These two results suggest that phosphorylation regulates Dup activity differently during these developmentally specific types of DNA replication. Moreover, the ability of the CDK site mutant to rapidly inhibit BrdU incorporation suggests that Dup is required for fork elongation during amplification. In the context of findings from human and other cells, our results indicate that stringent regulation of Dup protein is critical to protect genome integrity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marguerite Thomer
- Department of Genetics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6145, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Li CJ, Vassilev A, DePamphilis ML. Role for Cdk1 (Cdc2)/cyclin A in preventing the mammalian origin recognition complex's largest subunit (Orc1) from binding to chromatin during mitosis. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24:5875-86. [PMID: 15199143 PMCID: PMC480893 DOI: 10.1128/mcb.24.13.5875-5886.2004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The eukaryotic origin recognition complex (ORC) selects the genomic sites where prereplication complexes are assembled and DNA replication begins. In proliferating mammalian cells, ORC activity appears to be regulated by reducing the affinity of the Orc1 subunit for chromatin during S phase and then preventing reformation of a stable ORC-chromatin complex until mitosis is completed and a nuclear membrane is assembled. Here we show that part of the mechanism by which this is accomplished is the selective association of Orc1 with Cdk1 (Cdc2)/cyclin A during the G(2)/M phase of cell division. This association accounted for the appearance in M-phase cells of hyperphosphorylated Orc1 that was subsequently dephosphorylated during the M-to-G(1) transition. Moreover, inhibition of Cdk activity in metaphase cells resulted in rapid binding of Orc1 to chromatin. However, chromatin binding was not mediated through increased affinity of Orc1 for Orc2, suggesting that additional events are involved in the assembly of functional ORC-chromatin sites. These results reveal that the same cyclin-dependent protein kinase that initiates mitosis in mammalian cells also concomitantly inhibits assembly of functional ORC-chromatin sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cong-jun Li
- Growth Biology Laboratory, Animal and Natural Resources Institute, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland 20705, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|