Effect of adenovirus infection on expression of human histone genes

Identification of specific cellular genes up-regulated late in adenovirus type 12 infection

The infection of human cells by adenoviruses leads to a gradual reduction in the activity of host cell functions while viral gene expression progresses in a regulated way. We used the DNA microarray technique to determine the transcriptional activity profiles of cellular genes upon infection with adenovirus type 12 (Ad12). The microarray data were validated by quantitative real-time PCR for genes which showed significant alterations after Ad12 infection. At 12 h postinfection, there is a striking up-regulation between 10- and 30-fold in the expression of the G1P2, IFIT1, and IFIT2 cellular immune response genes compared to mock-infected cells. At later stages of infection, when the majority of regulated cellular genes has been turned down, a limited number of cellular genes exhibit increased activities by factors of 3 or less. These genes belong to the signal transduction or transcriptional regulator classes or are active in protein degradation, like ANPEP, an aminopeptidase. The SCD and CYP2S1 genes function in lipid metabolism. The eucaryotic translation initiation factor 4 is up-regulated, and one of the major histocompatibility complex genes is diminished in activity. For two of the genes, one up-regulated (CTSF gene) and one down-regulated (CYR61 gene), alterations in gene activity were confirmed at the protein level by Western blotting experiments. Increased genetic activity of cellular genes late in adenovirus infection has not been reported previously and demonstrates that Ad12 has a sustained control of host cell gene expression well into the late phase of infection.

Modifications in molecular mechanisms associated with control of cell cycle regulated human histone gene expression during differentiation

Histone proteins are preferentially synthesized during the S-phase of the cell cycle, and the temporal and functional coupling of histone gene expression with DNA replication is mediated at both the transcriptional and posttranscriptional levels. The genes are transcribed throughout the cell cycle, and a 3-5-fold enhancement in the rate of transcription occurs during the first 2 h following initiation of DNA synthesis. Control of histone mRNA stability also accounts for some of the 20-100fold increase in cellular histone mRNA levels during S-phase and for the rapid and selective degradation of the mRNAs at the natural completion of DNA replication or when DNA synthesis is inhibited. Two segments of the proximal promoter, designated Sites I and II, influence the specificity and rate of histone gene transcription. Occupancy of Sites I and II during all periods of the cell cycle by three transacting factors (HiNF-A, HiNF-C, and HiNF-D) suggests that these protein-DNA interactions are responsible for the constitutive transcription of histone genes. Binding of HiNF-D in Site II is selectively lost, whereas occupancy of Site I by HiNF-A and -C persists when histone gene transcription is down regulated when cells terminally differentiate. These results are consistent with a primary role for interactions of HiNF-D with a proximal promoter element in rendering cell growth regulated human histone genes transcribable in proliferating cells.

Adenovirus transcriptional complexes contain EIa encoded tumour antigens physically bound to cellular proteins

Adenovirus type 12 transcriptional complexes were isolated from cells during the early phase of infection. Sedimentation analysis identified a fast sedimenting complex type I and a slow sedimenting complex type II. Both complexes made virus specific RNA complementary to all the early genes and both contained viral DNA, which in type II but not in type I had nucleosome like configuration. Analysis of the proteins of the complexes with antiserum against Ad 12 EIa-beta-galactosidase fusion protein expressed in E. coli demonstrated the following: (a) type I complex contained EIa 45 K protein, which co-precipitated with cellular proteins of mol. wt. 42, 58, and 60 K, (b) type II complex contained EIa 47 K protein, which co-precipitated with major cellular proteins of 35, 40-46 K and minor proteins of 58, 60, 68, 76, 86, and 120-150 K. Association of EIa specific and cellular proteins to transcriptional complexes was sensitive to both 1 M NaCl and DNAse I indicating the DNA binding nature of these proteins. Treatment of transcriptional complexes with 1 M NaCl or DNase I released EIa proteins, which still remained strongly bound to cellular proteins. These findings suggested that EIa proteins bind to viral DNA and that this binding is probably mediated by cellular proteins.

Adenovirus type 2 activates cell cycle-dependent genes that are a subset of those activated by serum

We have studied a panel of 10 genes and cDNA sequences that are expressed in a cell cycle-dependent manner in different types of cells from different species and that are inducible by different mitogens. These include five sequences (c-myc, 4F1, 2F1, 2A9, and KC-1) that are preferentially expressed in the early part of the G1 phase, three genes (ornithine decarboxylase, p53, and c-rasHa) preferentially expressed in middle or late G1, and two genes (thymidine kinase and histone H3) preferentially expressed in the S phase of the cell cycle. We have studied the expression of these genes in nonpermissive (tsAF8) and semipermissive (Swiss 3T3) cells infected with adenovirus type 2. Under the conditions of these experiments, adenovirus type 2 infection stimulates cellular DNA synthesis in both tsAF8 and 3T3 cells. However, four of the five early G1 genes (c-myc, 4F1, KC-1, and 2A9) and one of the late G1 genes (c-ras) are not induced by adenovirus infection, although they are strongly induced by serum. The other sequences (2F1, ornithine decarboxylase, p53, thymidine kinase, and histone H3) are activated by both adenovirus and serum. We conclude that the cell cycle-dependent genes activated by adenovirus 2 are a subset of the cell cycle-dependent genes activated by serum. The data suggest that the mechanisms by which serum and adenovirus induce cellular DNA synthesis are not identical.

Regulation of protein synthesis in virus-infected animal cells

This chapter summarizes the structural features that govern the translation of viral mRNAs: where the synthesis of a protein starts and ends, how many proteins can be produced from one mRNA, and how efficiently. It focuses on the interplay between viral and cellular mRNAs and the translational machinery. That interplay, together with the intrinsic structure of viral mRNAs, determines the patterns of translation in infected cells. It also points out some possibilities for translational regulation that can only be glimpsed at present, but are likely to come into focus in the future. The mechanism of selecting the initiation site for protein synthesis appears to follow a single formula. The translational machinery displays a certain flexibility that is exploited more frequently by viral than by cellular mRNAs. Although some of the parameters that determine efficiency have been identified, how efficiently a given mRNA will be translated cannot be predicted by summing the known parameters.

Adenovirus type 2 activates cell cycle-dependent genes that are a subset of those activated by serum

We have studied a panel of 10 genes and cDNA sequences that are expressed in a cell cycle-dependent manner in different types of cells from different species and that are inducible by different mitogens. These include five sequences (c-myc, 4F1, 2F1, 2A9, and KC-1) that are preferentially expressed in the early part of the G1 phase, three genes (ornithine decarboxylase, p53, and c-rasHa) preferentially expressed in middle or late G1, and two genes (thymidine kinase and histone H3) preferentially expressed in the S phase of the cell cycle. We have studied the expression of these genes in nonpermissive (tsAF8) and semipermissive (Swiss 3T3) cells infected with adenovirus type 2. Under the conditions of these experiments, adenovirus type 2 infection stimulates cellular DNA synthesis in both tsAF8 and 3T3 cells. However, four of the five early G1 genes (c-myc, 4F1, KC-1, and 2A9) and one of the late G1 genes (c-ras) are not induced by adenovirus infection, although they are strongly induced by serum. The other sequences (2F1, ornithine decarboxylase, p53, thymidine kinase, and histone H3) are activated by both adenovirus and serum. We conclude that the cell cycle-dependent genes activated by adenovirus 2 are a subset of the cell cycle-dependent genes activated by serum. The data suggest that the mechanisms by which serum and adenovirus induce cellular DNA synthesis are not identical.

HeLa cell beta-tubulin gene transcription is stimulated by adenovirus 5 in parallel with viral early genes by an E1a-dependent mechanism

We report that the rate of transcription of cellular beta-tubulin genes increases during the early phase of adenovirus infection of HeLa cells, with kinetics very similar to those routinely found for viral genes. This activation depends upon adenovirus early region E1a, which encodes products that activate early virus transcription. To compare the responses of viral and cellular genes to E1a, we infected HeLa cells with dl312, a transcriptionally inactive deletion mutant that lacks a functional E1a gene. We then superinfected the cells with a helper virus, dl327, which encodes active E1a products, and measured changes in the rates of transcription of various cell and viral genes. Early region E3 of dl312 was activated 0 to 6 h postinfection and then repressed at 8 h postinfection, thus reproducing the two-step kinetics characteristic of a wild-type infection. Synthesis of beta-tubulin nuclear RNA was also transiently induced two- to six-fold, rising and falling in a manner similar to E3 transcription. An increase in helper virus multiplicity gave an increase in beta-tubulin stimulation, but dl312 alone, even at a high multiplicity of infection, gave no induction, confirming the requirement for E1a. beta-Actin nuclear RNA was actively synthesized before infection, but it was not further stimulated by the virus. Cellular beta-globin gene transcription was not stimulated by the virus, although transcription of a transfected beta-globin plasmid was induced by the virus or from a cotransfected E1a expression plasmid. We conclude that adenovirus 5 can stimulate beta-tubulin gene transcription. We discuss the significance for the viral life cycle of viral stimulation of cell genes and consider possible mechanisms in the light of the results obtained with beta-actin and beta-tubulin.

HeLa cell beta-tubulin gene transcription is stimulated by adenovirus 5 in parallel with viral early genes by an E1a-dependent mechanism

We report that the rate of transcription of cellular beta-tubulin genes increases during the early phase of adenovirus infection of HeLa cells, with kinetics very similar to those routinely found for viral genes. This activation depends upon adenovirus early region E1a, which encodes products that activate early virus transcription. To compare the responses of viral and cellular genes to E1a, we infected HeLa cells with dl312, a transcriptionally inactive deletion mutant that lacks a functional E1a gene. We then superinfected the cells with a helper virus, dl327, which encodes active E1a products, and measured changes in the rates of transcription of various cell and viral genes. Early region E3 of dl312 was activated 0 to 6 h postinfection and then repressed at 8 h postinfection, thus reproducing the two-step kinetics characteristic of a wild-type infection. Synthesis of beta-tubulin nuclear RNA was also transiently induced two- to six-fold, rising and falling in a manner similar to E3 transcription. An increase in helper virus multiplicity gave an increase in beta-tubulin stimulation, but dl312 alone, even at a high multiplicity of infection, gave no induction, confirming the requirement for E1a. beta-Actin nuclear RNA was actively synthesized before infection, but it was not further stimulated by the virus. Cellular beta-globin gene transcription was not stimulated by the virus, although transcription of a transfected beta-globin plasmid was induced by the virus or from a cotransfected E1a expression plasmid. We conclude that adenovirus 5 can stimulate beta-tubulin gene transcription. We discuss the significance for the viral life cycle of viral stimulation of cell genes and consider possible mechanisms in the light of the results obtained with beta-actin and beta-tubulin.

Is human histone gene expression autogenously regulated?

It has been well documented that core and H1 histone mRNAs accumulate in a manner which closely parallels the initiation of DNA synthesis and histone protein synthesis, suggesting that the onset of histone gene expression early during S phase is at least in part transcriptionally mediated. In fact, it appears that throughout S phase the synthesis of histone proteins is modulated by the availability of histone mRNAs. On the other hand, the stability of histone mRNAs and the destabilization of histone mRNAs when DNA replication is completed or inhibited are highly selective, tightly coupled and largely post-transcriptionally controlled. We present a model to account for histone mRNA turnover whereby the natural or inhibitor-induced termination of DNA replication results in an immediate loss of high affinity binding sites for newly synthesized histone proteins which in turn brings about a transient accumulation of unbound histones. These unbound histones could modify the histone translation complex, via interactions with polysomal histone mRNAs, in such a manner as to render histone mRNAs accessible to cellular ribonucleases. This type of mechanism would be operative solely at the post-transcriptional level and would be compatible with the rapid, RNA synthesis-independent destabilization of histone mRNAs which occurs following inhibition of DNA replication, as well as with the requirement for protein synthesis for histone mRNA destabilization to be initiated.