Gene-Based Diagnosis of Tuberculosis from Oral Swabs with a New Generation Pathogen Enrichment Technique

Diagnostic accuracy of oral swab for detection of pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a significant concern in terms of public health, necessitating the timely and accurate diagnosis to impede its advancement. The utilization of oral swab analysis (OSA) presents a promising approach for diagnosing pulmonary TB by identifying Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) within oral epithelial cells. Due to disparities in the diagnostic performance of OSA reported in the original studies, we conducted a meticulous meta-analysis to comprehensively assess the diagnostic efficacy of OSA in pulmonary TB.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive investigation across multiple databases, namely PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, Chinese BioMedical Literature Database (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI), and Wanfang China Science and Technology Journal Database to identify relevant studies. Out search query utilized the following keywords: oral swab, buccal swab, tongue swab, tuberculosis, and TB. Subsequently, we employed STATA 16.0 to compute the combined sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio for both the overall and subgroup analyses.

Results

Our findings indicated that OSA has a combined sensitivity of 0.67 and specificity of 0.95 in individuals with pulmonary TB. Subgroup analysis further revealed that among adult individuals with pulmonary TB, the sensitivity and specificity of OSA were 0.73 and 0.93, respectively. In HIV-negative individuals with pulmonary TB, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.68 and 0.98, respectively. The performance of OSA in detecting pulmonary TB correlated with the bacteria load in sputum. Additionally, the sensitivity for diagnosing pulmonary TB using tongue specimens was higher (0.75, 95% CI: 0.65-0.83) compared to cheek specimens (0.52, 95% CI: 0.34-0.70), while both types of specimens demonstrated high specificity.

Conclusions

To conclude, oral swabs serve as a promising alternative for diagnosing pulmonary TB, especially in adult patients. In addition, tongue swabs yield better sensitivity than cheek swabs to identify pulmonary TB patients.

Systematic review registration

identifier: CRD42023421357.

Oral swabs with a rapid molecular diagnostic test for pulmonary tuberculosis in adults and children: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Tuberculosis is a leading cause of infectious disease mortality worldwide, but diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis remains challenging. Oral swabs are a promising non-sputum alternative sample type for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of oral swabs to detect pulmonary tuberculosis in adults and children and suggest research implications.

METHODS

In this systematic review, we searched published and preprint studies from Jan 1, 2000, to July 5, 2022, from eight databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Science Citation Index, medRxiv, bioRxiv, Global Index Medicus, and Google Scholar). We included diagnostic accuracy studies including cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies in adults and children from which we could extract or derive sensitivity and specificity of oral swabs as a sample type for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis against a sputum microbiological (nucleic acid amplification test [NAAT] on sputum or culture) or composite reference standard.

FINDINGS

Of 550 reports identified by the search, we included 16 eligible reports (including 20 studies and 3083 participants) that reported diagnostic accuracy estimates on oral swabs for pulmonary tuberculosis. Sensitivity on oral swabs ranged from 36% (95% CI 26-48) to 91% (80-98) in adults and 5% (1-14) to 42% (23-63) in children. Across all studies, specificity ranged from 66% (95% CI 52-78) to 100% (97-100), with most studies reporting specificity of more than 90%. Meta-analysis was not performed because of sampling and testing heterogeneity.

INTERPRETATION

Sensitivity varies in both adults and children when diverse methods are used. Variability in sampling location, swab type, and type of NAAT used in accuracy studies limits comparison. Although data are suggestive that high accuracy is achievable using oral swabs with molecular testing, more research is needed to define optimal methods for using oral swabs as a specimen for tuberculosis detection. The current data suggest that tongue swabs and swab types that collect increased biomass might have increased sensitivity. We would recommend that future studies use these established methods to continue to refine sample processing to maximise sensitivity.

FUNDING

Bill and Melinda Gates foundation (INV-045721) and FIND (Netherlands Enterprise Agency on behalf of the Minister for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation [NL-GRNT05] and KfW Development Bank, German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [KFW-TBBU01/02]).

Accuracy of upper respiratory tract samples to diagnose Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary tuberculosis due to Mycobacterium tuberculosis can be challenging to diagnose when sputum samples cannot be obtained, which is especially problematic in children and older people. We systematically appraised the performance characteristics and diagnostic accuracy of upper respiratory tract sampling for diagnosing active pulmonary tuberculosis.

METHODS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Cinahl, Web of Science, Global Health, and Global Health Archive databases for studies published between database inception and Dec 6, 2022 that reported on the accuracy of upper respiratory tract sampling for tuberculosis diagnosis compared with microbiological testing of sputum or gastric aspirate reference standard. We included studies that evaluated the accuracy of upper respiratory tract sampling (laryngeal swabs, nasopharyngeal aspirate, oral swabs, saliva, mouth wash, nasal swabs, plaque samples, and nasopharyngeal swabs) to be tested for microbiological diagnosis of tuberculous (by culture and nucleic acid amplification tests) compared with a reference standard using either sputum or gastric lavage for a microbiological test. We included cohort, case-control, cross-sectional, and randomised controlled studies that recruited participants from any community or clinical setting. We excluded post-mortem studies. We used a random-effects meta-analysis with a bivariate hierarchical model to estimate pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostics odds ratio (DOR; odds of a positive test with disease relative to without), stratified by sampling method. We assessed bias using QUADAS-2 criteria. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021262392).

FINDINGS

We screened 10 159 titles for inclusion, reviewed 274 full texts, and included 71, comprising 119 test comparisons published between May 13, 1933, and Dec 19, 2022, in the systematic review (53 in the meta-analysis). For laryngeal swabs, pooled sensitivity was 57·8% (95% CI 50·5-65·0), specificity was 93·8% (88·4-96·8), and DOR was 20·7 (11·1-38·8). Nasopharyngeal aspirate sensitivity was 65·2% (52·0-76·4), specificity was 97·9% (96·0-99·0), and DOR was 91·0 (37·8-218·8). Oral swabs sensitivity was 56·7% (44·3-68·2), specificity was 91·3% (CI 81·0-96·3), and DOR was 13·8 (5·6-34·0). Substantial heterogeneity in diagnostic accuracy was found, probably due to differences in reference and index standards.

INTERPRETATION

Upper respiratory tract sampling holds promise to expand access to tuberculosis diagnosis. Exploring historical methods using modern microbiological techniques might further increase options for alternative sample types. Prospective studies are needed to optimise accuracy and utility of sampling methods in clinical practice.

FUNDING

UK Medical Research Council, Wellcome, and UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office.

Diagnostic Yield of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests in Oral Samples for Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The diagnostic accuracy of oral specimen nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) for pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) remains controversial. We performed a systematic review according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, including studies that reported the diagnostic yield of NAATs in oral samples for PTB diagnosis. The pooled estimates, including those of sensitivity and specificity, were calculated, and a meta-regression was performed to investigate heterogeneity, which was determined using χ² and I² tests. A total of 23 articles were included, and the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve of NAATs in oral samples for PTB diagnosis were 50% (95% CI, 37%-63%), 97% (95% CI, 93%-99%), and 0.89 (95% CI, 86%-92%; I ² = 99%; chi-square, 169.61; P < .001), respectively. Our data demonstrated that NAATs using oral samples have a less satisfactory sensitivity and high specificity for PTB diagnosis. However, due to significant heterogeneity, such as heterogeneity in age, the results should be interpreted with caution.

Multicenter Testing of a Simple Molecular Diagnostic System for the Diagnosis of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis

Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) is a communicable disease and still remains a threat to common health. Thus, early diagnosis and treatment are required to prevent the spread of infection. Despite the recent advances in molecular diagnostic systems, the commonly used MTB diagnostic tools are laboratory-based assays, such as mycobacterial culture, MTB PCR, and Xpert MTB/RIF. To address this limitation, point-of-care testing (POCT)-based molecular diagnostic technologies capable of sensitive and accurate detection even in environments with limited sources are needed. In this study, we propose simple tuberculosis (TB) molecular diagnostic assay by combining sample preparation and DNA-detection steps. The sample preparation is performed using a syringe filter with amine-functionalized diatomaceous earth and homobifunctional imidoester. Subsequently, the target DNA is detected by quantitative PCR (polymerase chain reaction). The results can be obtained within 2 h from samples with large volumes, without any additional instruments. The limit of detection of this system is 10 times higher than those of conventional PCR assays. We validated the clinical utility of the proposed method in 88 sputum samples obtained from four hospitals in the Republic of Korea. Overall, the sensitivity of this system was superior to those of other assays. Therefore, the proposed system can be useful for MTB diagnosis in limited-resource settings.