Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam, Ceftazidime-Avibactam, and Cefiderocol against Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Recovered at a German University Hospital

Global prevalence of cefiderocol non-susceptibility in Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cefiderocol is a last resort option for carbapenem-resistant (CR) Gram-negative bacteria, especially metallo-β-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and CR Acinetobacter baumannii. Monitoring global levels of cefiderocol non-susceptibility (CFDC-NS) is important.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically collate and examine studies investigating in vitro CFDC-NS and estimate the global prevalence of CFDC-NS against major Gram-negative pathogens.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed and Scopus, up to May 2023.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Eligible were studies reporting CFDC-NS in Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii, or Stenotrophomonas maltophilia clinical isolates.

RISK-OF-BIAS ASSESSMENT

Two independent reviewers extracted study data and assessed the risk of bias on the population, setting, and measurement (susceptibility testing) domains.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Binomial-Normal mixed-effects models were applied to estimate CFDC-NS prevalence by species, coresistance phenotype, and breakpoint definition (EUCAST, CLSI, and FDA). Sources of heterogeneity were investigated by subgroup and meta-regression analyses.

RESULTS

In all, 78 studies reporting 82 035 clinical isolates were analysed (87% published between 2020 and 2023). CFDC-NS prevalence (EUCAST breakpoints) was low overall but varied by species (S. maltophilia 0.4% [95% CI 0.2-0.7%], Enterobacterales 3.0% [95% CI 1.5-6.0%], P. aeruginosa 1.4% [95% CI 0.5-4.0%]) and was highest for A. baumannii (8.8%, 95% CI 4.9-15.2%). CFDC-NS was much higher in CR Enterobacterales (12.4%, 95% CI 7.3-20.0%) and CR A. baumannii (13.2%, 95% CI 7.8-21.5%), but relatively low for CR P. aeruginosa (3.5%, 95% CI 1.6-7.8%). CFDC-NS was exceedingly high in New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (38.8%, 95% CI 22.6-58.0%), New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-producing A. baumannii (44.7%, 95% CI 34.5-55.4%), and ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant Enterobacterales (36.6%, 95% CI 22.7-53.1%). CFDC-NS varied considerably with breakpoint definition, predominantly among CR bacteria. Additional sources of heterogeneity were single-centre investigations and geographical regions.

CONCLUSIONS

CFDC-NS prevalence is low overall, but alarmingly high for specific CR phenotypes circulating in some institutions or regions. Continuous surveillance and updating of global CFDC-NS estimates are imperative while cefiderocol is increasingly introduced into clinical practice. The need to harmonize EUCAST and CLSI breakpoints was evident.

In vitro activity of cefiderocol and comparator antibiotics against multidrug-resistant non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli

Background

This study evaluated the in vitro activity of cefiderocol, ceftazidime/avibactam, and aztreonam/avibactam against clinically important multidrug-resistant non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli.

Methods

Bacteraemic isolates of 126 multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (MDRAB), 110 imipenem-resistant Pseudamoas aeruginosa [including 14 difficult-to-treat resistant P. aeruginosa (DTRPA)], 45 beta-lactam-non-susceptible Burkholderia cepacia complex (BCC), 47 levofloxacin or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole-non-susceptible Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and 22 ciprofloxacin-non-susceptible Elizabethkingia spp. collected between 2019 and 2021 were subjected to MIC determination for cefiderocol, ceftazidime/avibactam and aztreonam/avibactam.

Results

The MIC50/90s of cefiderocol for drug-resistant A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa, BCC, S. maltophilia and Elizabethkingia spp. were 0.25/2, 0.25/1, ≤0.06/≤0.06, ≤0.06/0.25 and >32/>32 mg/L, respectively. Cefiderocol inhibited 94.4% (119/126) of MDRAB, 100% of imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa, 100% of DTRPA and 100% of BCC at an MIC ≤4 mg/L, and 97.9% (46/47) of S. maltophilia at ≤1 mg/L. Ceftazidime/avibactam inhibited 76.4% (84/110) of imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa, 21.4% (3/14) of DTRPA and 68.9% (31/45) of BCC at an MIC ≤8 mg/L. Aztreonam/avibactam had MIC50/90s of 16/>32, 8/16 and 4/8 mg/L for imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa, BCC and S. maltophilia, respectively. At ≤8 mg/L, aztreonam/avibactam inhibited 7.1% (1/14) of DTRPA and 93.6% (44/47) of S. maltophilia isolates. Elizabethkingia spp. demonstrated high MICs for cefiderocol, ceftazidime/avibactam and aztreonam/avibactam, with all MIC50s and MIC90s > 32 mg/L.

Conclusion

Cefiderocol may serve as an alternative treatment for multidrug-resistant A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa, BCC and S. maltophilia when other antibiotics have been ineffective or intolerable. The role of ceftazidime/avibactam and aztreonam/avibactam in the management of BCC or S. maltophilia infections warrants further investigation.

Case Commentary: Successful Use of Cefepime/Zidebactam (WCK 5222) as a Salvage Therapy for the Treatment of Disseminated Extensively Drug-Resistant New Delhi Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection in an Adult Patient with Acute T-Cell Leukemia

Multidrug-resistant/extensively drug-resistant (MDR/XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) are critical antimicrobial resistance threats. Despite their increasing prevalence, treatment options for metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing PA are limited, especially for New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM) producers. Pending further clinical studies, this case provides support for limited-scope use of cefepime-zidebactam for treating disseminated infections secondary to NDM-producing XDR PA. Susceptibilities should be tested and/or alternative regimens considered when treating isolates with alternative MBLs or increased efflux pump expression because some in vitro data suggest associated loss of cefepime-zidebactam susceptibility.

Cefiderocol Treatment for Patients with Multidrug- and Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections in the Compassionate Use Program

Cefiderocol is an option for infections caused by multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, but its in vitro activity against these isolates and its clinical effectiveness for isolates with MICs of >1 μg/mL is unclear. We investigated the in vitro activity of cefiderocol against P. aeruginosa isolates collected from patients treated with cefiderocol through the compassionate use program and assessed physician-reported clinical response and 28-day all-cause mortality by cefiderocol MIC values. P. aeruginosa isolates underwent susceptibility testing to cefiderocol and comparator agents by using reference broth microdilution. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA; susceptible, ≤1 μg/mL) and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI; susceptible, ≤4 μg/mL) cefiderocol breakpoints were applied. Additionally, molecular characterization of β-lactamase genes was performed. Clinical response and vital status were reported by treating physicians. Forty-six patients with P. aeruginosa infections were evaluated. Twenty-nine (63%) and 42 (91%) isolates were susceptible to cefiderocol using FDA and CLSI breakpoints, respectively. Thirty-seven (80%) and 32 (70%) isolates were not susceptible to ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam, respectively. The clinical response rate was 69% (20/29) with a cefiderocol MIC of ≤1 μg/mL, 69% (9/13) with a cefiderocol MIC of 2 to 4 μg/mL, and 100% (4/4) with an MIC of ≥8 μg/mL, while day 28 all-cause mortality rates were 23% (6/26; MIC ≤ 1 μg/mL), 33% (4/12; MIC, 2 to 4 μg/mL), and 0% (0/4; MIC ≥8 μg/mL), respectively. Cefiderocol was active in vitro against most P. aeruginosa isolated from patients with limited or no alternative therapies. Patients with cefiderocol MICs of 2 to 4 μg/mL did not have significantly worse outcomes than those with MICs of ≤1 μg/mL.

Abundant diversity of accessory genetic elements and associated antimicrobial resistance genes in pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from a single Chinese hospital

OBJECTIVES

Pseudomonas aeruginosa has intrinsic antibiotic resistance and the strong ability to acquire additional resistance genes. However, a limited number of investigations provide detailed modular structure dissection and evolutionary analysis of accessory genetic elements (AGEs) and associated resistance genes (ARGs) in P. aeruginosa isolates. The objective of this study is to reveal the prevalence and transmission characteristics of ARGs by epidemiological investigation and bioinformatics analysis of AGEs of P. aeruginosa isolates taken from a Chinese hospital.

METHODS

Draft-genome sequencing was conducted for P. aeruginosa clinical isolates (n = 48) collected from a single Chinese hospital between 2019 and 2021. The clones of P. aeruginosa isolates, type 3 secretion system (T3SS)-related virulotypes, and the resistance spectrum were identified using multilocus sequence typing (MLST), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and antimicrobial susceptibility tests. In addition, 17 of the 48 isolates were fully sequenced. An extensive modular structure dissection and genetic comparison was applied to AGEs of the 17 sequenced P. aeruginosa isolates.

RESULTS

From the draft-genome sequencing, 13 STs were identified, showing high genetic diversity. BLAST search and PCR detection of T3SS genes (exoT, exoY, exoS, and exoU) revealed that the exoS+/exoU- virulotype dominated. At least 69 kinds of acquired ARGs, involved in resistance to 10 different categories of antimicrobials, were identified in the 48 P. aeruginosa isolates. Detailed genetic dissection and sequence comparisons were applied to 25 AGEs from the 17 isolates, together with five additional prototype AGEs from GenBank. These 30 AGEs were classified into five groups -- integrative and conjugative elements (ICEs), unit transposons, Inc_pPBL16 plasmids, Inc_p60512-IMP plasmids, and Inc_pPA7790 plasmids.

CONCLUSION

This study provides a broad-scale and deeper genomics understanding of P. aeruginosa isolates taken from a single Chinese hospital. The isolates collected are characterized by high genetic diversity, high virulence, and multiple drug resistance. The AGEs in P. aeruginosa chromosomes and plasmids, as important genetic platforms for the spread of ARGs, contribute to enhancing the adaptability of P. aeruginosa in hospital settings.

In Vivo Development of Aztreonam Resistance in Meropenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Owing to Overexpression of the blaPDC-16

The rapid acquisition of antibiotic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa has been a complex problem in clinics. Two meropenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates were collected from the same patient on May 24, 2021, and June 4, 2021, respectively. The first was susceptible to aztreonam, while the second displayed resistance. This study aimed to identify the genetic differences between two P. aeruginosa isolates and uncover alterations formed by the within-host bacterial evolution leading to aztreonam resistance during therapy. Strains were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing using the broth microdilution method. Genomic DNAs were obtained to identify their genetic differences. The relative mRNA levels of β-lactam-resistance genes were determined by real-time PCR. Both isolates belonged to ST 773 high-risk clones with the same antibiotic resistance genes, eliminating the possibility of horizontally obtaining resistance genes. Reverse transcription (RT)-PCR results showed that the blaPDC-16 mRNA level in the second one was about 1,500 times higher than that in the first one. When 3-aminophenyl boronic acid was added, the second strain recovered its susceptibility to aztreonam, which confirmed that the overexpression of blaPDC-16 was the main reason for the isolate's resistance to aztreonam. Compared to the first strain, the second showed a single amino acid substitution in AmpR located upstream of blaPDC-16, which may contribute to the upregulation of blaPDC-16 and lead to aztreonam resistance. AmpR plays an essential role in regulating antibiotic resistance in P. aeruginosa, and there is a need to be alert to clinical treatment failures associated with mutations in ampR. IMPORTANCE Pseudomonas aeruginosa is notorious for being highly resistant to antimicrobial agents. In this study, two P. aeruginosa strains isolated from the same patient with different susceptibility to aztreonam were used to illustrate the within-host resistance evolution process of P. aeruginosa. Both isolates, which belonged to a ST773 high-risk clone, had the same β-lactam resistance genes (blaPDC-16, blaIMP-45, blaOXA-1, and blaOXA-395), which means the second isolate might have been derived from the first isolate by gaining aztreonam resistance via mutations associated with aztreonam resistance relative genes. Subsequently, we found that mutation in ampR may be the cause of aztreonam resistance in the second isolate. Mutation in ampR leads to its loss of control over blaPDC-16, allowing overexpression of blaPDC-16 and further resistance to aztreonam. This study revealed that ampR plays an essential role in regulating antibiotic resistance in P. aeruginosa. There is a need to be alert to clinical treatment failures associated with mutations in ampR.

Cefiderocol Efficacy in a Real-Life Setting: Single-Centre Retrospective Study

The current carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria (CR-GN) treatment guidelines lack strong evidence about cefiderocol (CFD) efficacy against CR-GN, especially CRAB. The study's purpose is to evaluate the effectiveness of CFD in a real-life setting. We made a single-center retrospective study of 41 patients who received CFD in our hospital for several CR-GN infections. Bloodstream infections (BSI) affected 43.9% (18/41) of patients, while CRAB affected 75.6% (31/41) of isolated CR-GN patients. Thirty-days (30-D) all-causes mortality affected 36.6% (15/41) of patients, while end-of-treatment (EOT) clinical cure affected 56.1% (23/41). Finally, microbiological eradication at EOT affected 56.1% (23/41) of patients. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that septic shock is an independent factor associated with mortality. Subgroup analyses showed no difference in CFD effectiveness between monotherapy and combination therapy.

Alternatives Therapeutic Approaches to Conventional Antibiotics: Advantages, Limitations and Potential Application in Medicine

Resistance to antimicrobials and particularly multidrug resistance is one of the greatest challenges in the health system nowadays. The continual increase in the rates of antimicrobial resistance worldwide boosted by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic poses a major public health threat. Different approaches have been employed to minimize the effect of resistance and control this threat, but the question still lingers as to their safety and efficiency. In this context, new anti-infectious approaches against multidrug resistance are being examined. Use of new antibiotics and their combination with new β-lactamase inhibitors, phage therapy, antimicrobial peptides, nanoparticles, and antisense antimicrobial therapeutics are considered as one such promising approach for overcoming bacterial resistance. In this review, we provide insights into these emerging alternative therapies that are currently being evaluated and which may be developed in the future to break the progression of antimicrobial resistance. We focus on their advantages and limitations and potential application in medicine. We further highlight the importance of the combination therapy approach, wherein two or more therapies are used in combination in order to more effectively combat infectious disease and increasing access to quality healthcare. These advances could give an alternate solution to overcome antimicrobial drug resistance. We eventually hope to provide useful information for clinicians who are seeking solutions to the problems caused by antimicrobial resistance.