Malondialdehyde as an Important Key Factor of Molecular Mechanisms of Vascular Wall Damage under Heart Diseases Development

This mini review is devoted to a specific issue: the role of malondialdehyde (MDA)-a secondary product of free radical lipid peroxidation-in the molecular mechanisms of the formation of primary atherosclerotic vascular wall lesions. The principal difference between this review and the available literature is that it discusses in detail the important role in atherogenesis not of "oxidized" LDL (i.e., LDL particles containing lipohydroperoxides), but of LDL particles chemically modified by the natural low-molecular weight dicarbonyl MDA. To confirm this, we consider the data obtained by us earlier, indicating that "atherogenic" are not LDL oxidized as a result of free radical lipoperoxidation and containing lipohydroperoxy derivatives of phospholipids in the outer layer of particles, but LDL whose apoprotein B-100 has been modified due to the chemical reaction of terminal lysine residue amino groups of the apoB-100 with the aldehyde groups of the MDA (Maillard reaction). In addition, we present our original data proving that MDA injures endothelial glycocalyx that suppress the ability of the endothelium to control arterial tone according to changes in wall shear stress. In summary, this mini review for the first time exhaustively discloses the key role of MDA in atherogenesis.

Dicarbonyl-Dependent Modification of LDL as a Key Factor of Endothelial Dysfunction and Atherosclerotic Vascular Wall Damage

The review presents evidence that the main damage to the vascular wall occurs not from the action of “oxidized” LDL, which contain hydroperoxy acyls in the phospholipids located in their outer layer, but from the action of LDL particles whose apoprotein B-100 is chemically modified with low molecular weight dicarbonyls, such as malondialdehyde, glyoxal, and methylglyoxal. It has been argued that dicarbonyl-modified LDL, which have the highest cholesterol content, are particularly “atherogenic”. High levels of dicarbonyl-modified LDL have been found to be characteristic of some mutations of apoprotein B-100. Based on the reviewed data, we hypothesized a common molecular mechanism underlying vascular wall damage in atherosclerosis and diabetes mellitus. The important role of oxidatively modified LDL in endothelial dysfunction is discussed in detail. In particular, the role of the interaction of the endothelial receptor LOX-1 with oxidatively modified LDL, which leads to the expression of NADPH oxidase, which in turn generates superoxide anion radical, is discussed. Such hyperproduction of ROS can cause destruction of the glycocalyx, a protective layer of endotheliocytes, and stimulation of apoptosis in these cells. On the whole, the accumulated evidence suggests that carbonyl modification of apoprotein B-100 of LDL is a key factor responsible for vascular wall damage leading to atherogenesis and endothelial dysfunction. Possible ways of pharmacological correction of free radical processes in atherogenesis and diabetogenesis are also discussed.

Effect of Sulodexide on Circulating Blood Cells in Patients with Mild COVID-19

Background. Despite the fact that COVID-19 usually manifests with severe pneumonia, there is a growing body of evidence that life-threatening multiorgan damage is caused by vascular and hemostatic abnormalities. Since there is no established therapy, assessing antithrombotics is indeed important. Sulodexide, a compound derived from porcine intestinal mucosa is a mixture of fast-moving heparin fraction (80%) and dermatan sulfate (20%), is approved in Europe and currently in trials for COVID-19 indication. Methods. This single-center, prospective, observational study included 28 patients with mild COVID-19 hospitalized in the Central Clinical Hospital of the Presidential Administration of the Russian Federation. Patients in the control group (n = 14) were treated using routine therapy according to current guidelines, while patients in the experimental group (n = 14) had the routine treatment supplemented with daily intravenous injections of sulodexide in 600-unit doses. Scanning electron microscopy was utilized to examine the blood specimens derived from the cubital vein at admission and at 10 days after hospitalization, which was approximately the average duration of patients’ treatment in the hospital (11.6 ± 0.4 days). Results. Sulodexide significantly (by 40%) diminished the score of circulating endothelial cells, potentially indicating its antiviral endothelium-protective properties. It also prevented the extra activation of the platelets and the formation of erythrocytic sludges. Among patients in the control group, the share of activated platelets rose from 37 ± 5% to 45 ± 6% (p = 0.04) over the course of the study period, whereas among patients in the experimental group, the share of activated platelets remained practically unchanged (43 ± 6% vs. 38 ± 4%, p = 0.22). The score of erythrocytic sludges in the control group remained practically the same (4.8 ± 1.1 at admission vs. 3.9 ± 0.9 after 10 days, p = 0.67), whereas in the experimental group, it significantly decreased (from 5.7 ± 1.7 to 2.4 ± 0.9, p = 0.03). Conclusions. Sulodexide is able to defend endothelium, normalize blood, and, seemingly, prevent thrombosis. Therefore, it may be considered as a promising and effective agent for the treatment of patients with mild COVID-19. Broader randomized trials are needed to assess whether the observed findings will transform into sustained long-term clinical benefit.