A comparison of findings on parents' and teachers' questionnaires, and detailed ophthalmic and psychological assessments

Validity of vision screening program conducted by preschool teachers: An interventional study

Background

Clear vision is crucial for effective learning among preschool children. Hence, early detection of vision impairment and prompt treatment are required to improve prognosis. Currently, limited information is available, and no program exists to screen for vision impairment among preschoolers in Bangladesh. This study aimed to validate the KieVision™ Preschool Vision Screening Kit, translated into the Bengali language, to improve vision impairment detection among preschool children.

Methods

In this prospective case-control study, 60 preschool teachers from Chittagong were randomly selected. The study group was trained to conduct vision screening among preschool children using the translated kit, whereas the control group was trained using the Chittagong Eye Infirmary and Training Complex (CEITC) School Teachers' Training Module. Fifteen preschool children aged 4-6 years were screened by each preschool teacher and again by the optometrist.

Results

Sixty preschool teachers screened 900 children. The results showed a higher validity of vision screening findings by the preschool teachers in the study group (sensitivity, 68.00%; specificity, 92.75%) than in the control group (sensitivity 47.37%, specificity 70.39%). The level of agreement between the preschool teachers and optometrists was high for all tests (first-order agreement coefficient [AC1] ≥ 0.80 in the study group). The sensitivity and specificity of the visual acuity test for the study group were 59.65% and 94.15%, respectively, while in the control group it was 13.33% and 62.54%, respectively. A similar trend was noted in the general observation component and Hirschberg's test.

Conclusions

The Bengali Language KieVision™ Preschool Vision Screening Kit can be used effectively by preschool teachers in vision screening programs to improve the identification of vision impairment among preschool children in Bangladesh.

Parent-reported health in extremely preterm and extremely low-birthweight children at age 8 years compared with comparison children born at term

AIM

Extremely preterm and extremely low-birthweight (EP/ELBW) children (<28 completed weeks' gestation; birthweight <1000g) have a high risk of long-term adverse outcomes. Clinical developmental surveillance is difficult to achieve for all of these children. Our aim was to study the ability of two parent-completed questionnaires to differentiate health status of EP/ELBW children from that of a comparison group of children born at term, and to screen EP/ELBW children for disability compared with the ability of a multidisciplinary clinical assessment.

METHOD

A geographic cohort of 189 EP/ELBW children (100 males, 89 females) and a comparison group of 173 term children (92 males, 81 females) born in 1997 were assessed at the age of 8 years using parent questionnaires (the Child Health Questionnaire [CHQ] and the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 [HUI2]) and a multidisciplinary clinical assessment. The questionnaires and clinical assessment were compared with respect to their ability to differentiate between the health status of EP/ELBW children and children born at term and also to identify children with a disability.

RESULTS

The HUI2 was better than the CHQ at differentiating the health status of EP/ELBW and comparison children. Moderate and severe disability status were identified by the HUI2 with sensitivity ranging from 86 to 97%, specificity from 60 to 64%, positive predictive values from 34 to 39%, and negative predictive values from 95 to 99%.

INTERPRETATION

The HUI2 had suitable sensitivity and specificity to be used as a developmental screening tool for EP/ELBW children, but the CHQ did not. Given its low positive predictive values, however, the HUI2 should be viewed with caution as a final outcome measure for intervention trials, and would be better used to identify at-risk children who need a definitive clinical assessment.