Central venous lines in neonates: a study of 2186 catheters

Correcting Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Placement by External Manipulation of the Upper Limb Extremity

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) play a critical role in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), facilitating treatment in premature and critically ill neonates. However, achieving optimal PICC placement can present challenges, requiring meticulous monitoring and adjustment. Here, we describe the case of a 52-day-old, 1.9 kg preterm infant in the NICU requiring a central venous catheter for antibiotics and antifungals. Despite initial insertion into the basilic vein of the right forearm, imaging revealed the catheter's deviation into the right internal jugular vein. Leveraging the influence of arm position on catheter tip depth, external manipulation of the infant's right arm successfully repositioned the catheter tip into the superior vena cava (SVC). This case highlights the significant impact of arm positioning on PICC placement and underscores the efficacy of external extremity manipulation as a simple, non-invasive technique to adjust catheter position. Such innovative strategies offer promising alternatives to invasive interventions, emphasizing the importance of dynamic monitoring and adjustment techniques in neonatal PICC management.

Umbilically and Peripherally Inserted Thin Central Venous Catheters Have Similar Risks of Complications in Very Low-Birth-Weight Infants

Catheter complications can be life-threatening in very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants. We retrospectively evaluated non-elective removals of the first thin (1-2F) umbilical vein catheters (tUVCs (n = 92)) and peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs (n = 103)) among 195 VLBW infants. Catheters were removed non-electively in 78 infants (40%), typically due to suspected infection (n = 42) or catheter dislocation (n = 30). Infants with complications had lower birth weights and gestational ages than others. The frequencies and causes of catheter removal were similar in the tUVC and PICC groups. Thirty-one infants had true catheter infections. The number of infections/1000 catheter days was higher in the tUVC group than in the PICC group. In a multivariable analysis, gestational age was associated with catheter infection, but catheter type was not. The odds of catheter complications decreased with increasing gestational age, but no clear association with thin catheter type was found.

Closed intravenous systems for central vascular access: A difference maker for CLABSI rates in neonates?

BACKGROUND

Infants in neonatal units are susceptible to numerous potential iatrogenic risks. One key concern is central line-associated blood stream infection (CLABSI). To ensure patient safety and reduce the incidence of CLABSI toward zero, numerous evidence-based clinical interventions and product innovations have been implemented. Nevertheless, sustaining zero CLABSI for sustained periods remains challenging.

AIM

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact on CLABSI rates of introducing a preassembled closed intravenous (IV) administration set in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational analysis of routinely collected anonymized IV therapy infection data in a NICU. The study period was from January 2019 through June 2020.

RESULTS

Nine-hundred eighty five patients with a Epicutaneo-Caval Catheter (ECC) were included (456 legacy IV set, 529 closed IV set). Patient demographics were comparable between the two groups. ECC dwell time was the only IV characteristic associated (p = 0.04) with CLABSI. Mann-Whitney U-test demonstrated significant differences between the two sets for CLABSI complication events (p = 0.031). Prior to using the closed IV administration sets (January 2019-September 2019) the mean monthly CLABSI rate was 2.87 (/1000 device days). This figure declined to 0.22 (/1000 device days) afterwards (October 2019-June 2020). Zero CLABSIs were observed during January to June 2020.

CONCLUSIONS

Utilization of a pre-assembled closed IV administration set was associated with a reduction in CLABSI rates. The study results suggest that using a pre-assembled closed IV set concurrently with evidence-based central line infection control interventions can help attain extended periods of zero CLABSI.

The Role of Ultrasound in Epicutaneo-Caval Catheter Insertion in Neonates: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Future Perspectives

Chest and abdominal X-rays after the insertion of an epicutaneo-caval catheter in infants are the standard method of checking the tip location in many neonatal intensive care units. The role of ultrasound in the tip location of the epicutaneo-caval catheter in neonates has been the subject of many recent studies. This systematic review investigates the accuracy of epicutaneo-caval catheter tip location by comparing ultrasound and conventional radiology. We performed a systematic literature search in multiple databases. The selection of studies yielded nineteen articles. The systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis). The analyses showed that ultrasound is a better imaging technique for epicutaneo-caval catheter tip location in the neonatal intensive care unit than conventional radiology. By improving operator training and selecting a standardized echography protocol, ultrasound could become the gold standard for visualizing the epicutaneo-caval catheter tip in the neonatal intensive care unit. This would have some important benefits: (1) increased accuracy in tip location (2); a more rapid use of the central venous access (3); and a significant reduction in radiation exposure.

Tamponade and massive pleural effusions secondary to peripherally inserted central catheter in neonates-A complication to be aware of

Background

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) are frequently used in neonatal intensive care units (NICU) to assist premature and critically ill neonates. Massive pleural effusions, pericardial effusions, and cardiac tamponade secondary to PICC are extremely uncommon but have potentially fatal consequences.

Objective

This study investigates the incidence of tamponade, large pleural, and pericardial effusions secondary to peripherally inserted central catheters in a neonatal intensive care unit at a tertiary care center over a 10-year period. It explores possible etiologies behind such complications and suggests preventative measures.

Study design

Retrospective analysis of neonates who were admitted to the NICU at the AUBMC between January 2010 and January 2020, and who required insertion of PICC. Neonates who developed tamponade, large pleural, or pericardial effusions secondary to PICC insertion were investigated.

Results

Four neonates developed significant life-threatening effusions. Urgent pericardiocentesis and chest tube placement were required in two and one patients, respectively. No fatalities were encountered.

Conclusion

The abrupt onset of hemodynamic instability without an obvious cause in any neonate with PICC in situ should raise suspicion of pleural or pericardial effusions. Timely diagnosis through bedside ultrasound, and prompt aggressive intervention are critical.

The incidence and mortality rate of catheter-related neonatal pericardial effusion: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUD

Neonatal pericardial effusion (PCE) is one of the most severe complications of central catheters in neonates with its rapid progression and high mortality. We aim to estimate the overall incidence and mortality of catheter-related neonatal PCE, more importantly, to identify possible predictors for clinical reference.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, china national knowledge infrastructure, Wanfang Data, and Sinomed databases for subject words "central catheter," "neonate," "pericardial effusion" and their random words till June 8, 2020. This meta-analysis is based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Possible predictors of occurrences and deaths were extracted and assessed cooperatively. The pooled incidence rate of catheter-related neonatal PCE was calculated using a random effects model.

RESULTS

Twenty-one cohort studies and 99 cases were eligible. Pooled incidence is 3·8‰[2.2‰, 6.7‰]. Polyurethane catheters generate significantly more neonatal PCE than silicone counterparts (P < .01). 27% of the patients die. The mortality of patients with bradycardia is higher than others (P < .05). Catheters with a guidewire result in more deaths than umbilical venous catheter (UVC) and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) (P < .05). Without pericardiocentesis, mortality increases (P < .01). The difference of deaths between reposition and removing the catheter is insignificant (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Central catheters in Seldinger Technique (with a guidewire) put neonates at greater risk of PCE and consequent death. Silicone catheters excel at avoiding deadly catheter-related PCE, which could be a better choice in neonatal intensive care units (NICU). When catheter-related PCE occurs, timely diagnosis and pericardiocentesis save lives.

Fatal iatrogenic cardiac tamponade due to central venous catheterization

Fatal adverse events caused by any health professional as consequence of malpractice are uncommon. In this work, the authors report a fatal cardiac tamponade associated with a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) by the right jugular vein that perforated the right atrium of the heart. The diagnosis of cardiac tamponade was not detected in hospital during the intrapericardial infusion of total parenteral nutrition and was only registered during the autopsy. The postmortem examination showed a milky liquid inside the pericardial cavity compatible with the total parenteral nutrition administered. The catheter in its migration in the cardiac chambers, mechanically perforated the inner wall of the endocardium between the trabeculae carneae, continued its course between the myocardial fibers until it was externalized. In conclusion, cardiac tamponade, although it is an extremely rare medical complication, has a high risk of fatality specially if peripheral rather than central veins were cannulated.

The incidence of pericardial effusion requiring intervention in infants with a history of umbilical catheter placement: the US national database

OBJECTIVES

To assess the association of umbilical catheters (UC) placement with pericardial effusion (PCE) in newborn infants.

STUDY DESIGN

We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample dataset. We compared prevalence of PCE in infants with UC versus those without in three subpopulations: infants with birth weight (BW) > 2500 g or GA > 34 weeks, preterm infants with BW < 1500 g, and term infants with congenital heart disease (CHD) using regression analysis methods while controlling for clinical and demographic variables.

RESULT

First analysis included a weighted sample of 22,751,313 infants with no hydrops fetalis. Of them, 1869 neonates (0.01%) had PCE. Pericardial effusion was found in 0.17% of infants with only UAC, 0.21% of infants with only UVC and 0.29% of infants with both catheters with an adjusted odds ratios (aOR) (1.5, CI:1.2-1.9), (2.3, CI:1.7-2.9), and (2.9, CI:2.4-3.6), p < 0.001, respectively. Similar findings were found in infants <1500 g and in those with CHD.

CONCLUSION

Umbilical Catheter placement is associated with increased risk for pericardial effusion.

[Operation and management guidelines for peripherally inserted central catheter in neonates (2021)]

Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) has been widely used in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in recent years, but there are potential risks for complications related to PICC. Based on the current evidence in China and overseas, the operation and management guidelines for PICC in neonates were developed by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) in order to help the NICU staff to regulate the operation and management of PICC.

[Operation and management guidelines for peripherally inserted central catheter in neonates (2021)]

Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) has been widely used in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in recent years, but there are potential risks for complications related to PICC. Based on the current evidence in China and overseas, the operation and management guidelines for PICC in neonates were developed by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) in order to help the NICU staff to regulate the operation and management of PICC.

The efficacy and safety of peripheral intravenous parenteral nutrition vs 10% glucose in preterm infants born 30 to 33 weeks' gestation: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Preterm infants born 30 to 33 weeks' gestation often require early support with intravenous fluids because of respiratory distress, hypoglycemia or feed intolerance. When full feeds are anticipated to be reached within the first week, risks associated with intravenous delivery mode and type must be carefully considered. Recommendations are for parenteral nutrition to be infused via central venous lines (because of the high osmolarity), however, given the risks associated with central lines, clinicians may opt for 10% glucose via peripheral venous catheter when the need is short-term. We therefore compare a low osmolarity peripheral intravenous parenteral nutrition (P-PN) solution with peripheral intravenous 10% glucose on growth rate in preterm infants born 30 to 33 weeks' gestation.

METHODS

In this parallel group, single centre, superiority, non-blinded, randomised controlled trial, 92 (P-PN 42, control 50) infants born 30+ 0 to 33+ 6 weeks' gestation, were randomised within 24 h of age, to receive either P-PN (8% glucose, 30 g/L amino acids, 500 IU/L heparin and SMOFlipid®) or a control of peripheral intravenous 10% glucose. Both groups received enteral feeds according to hospital protocol. The primary outcome was rate of weight gain from birth to 21 days of age.

RESULTS

The rate of weight gain was significantly increased in P-PN infants compared with control (P-PN, n = 42, 18.7, SD 6.6 g/d vs control, n = 50, 14.8, SD 6.0 g/d; adjusted mean difference 3.9 g/d, 95% CI 1.3 to 6.6; P = 0.004), with the effect maintained to discharge home. Days to regain birthweight were significantly reduced and length gain significantly increased in P-PN infants. One infant in the P-PN group had a stage 3 extravasation which rapidly resolved. Blood urea nitrogen and triglyceride levels were significantly higher in the P-PN group in the first week of life, but there were no instances of abnormally high levels. There were no significant differences in any other clinical or biochemical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

P-PN improves the rate of weight gain to discharge home in preterm infants born 30 to 33 weeks gestation compared with peripheral intravenous 10% glucose.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12616000925448 . Registered 12 July 2016.

Neonatal management of prenatally suspected coarctation of the aorta

OBJECTIVES

(a) To determine the false-positive rate among newborns with prenatally suspected coarctation of the aorta (CoA) within the UCLA Health system, (b) to compare patient and maternal interventions and outcomes between false-positive cases and normal controls, and (c) to determine the timing of clinical presentation of CoA.

METHODS

We performed a single-center, retrospective case control study of all fetuses with suspected isolated CoA who underwent both fetal echocardiographic evaluation and subsequent delivery at UCLA between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2018. Maternal and neonatal medical records were reviewed for demographic and clinical data, for cases of suspected CoA and for controls. A separate review of our institution's surgical database was performed to identify characteristics of all patients (neonatal and pediatric) with isolated CoA who underwent surgical repair during the same time period.

RESULTS

Among the 50 fetal cases of isolated suspected CoA who delivered at our institution, 47 patients (94%) were found to be normal (false positives). Compared with normal controls, patients with suspected CoA were more likely to have delayed maternal bonding, delayed feeding, admission to the intensive care unit, performance of neonatal echocardiograms, initiation of intravenous fluids and initiation of prostaglandin E1, and a longer length of hospital stay. Among the 38 patients undergoing CoA repair at our institution during the study period, four patients were prenatally diagnosed and no patient presented clinically with symptoms before 48 hours after delivery.

CONCLUSION

Compared with normal controls, patients with prenatally suspected coarctation are more likely to have delayed maternal bonding, delayed feeding, more frequent neonatal echocardiograms, and longer length of hospital stay. Further refinement of neonatal management may improve postnatal care.

Risk factors for peripherally inserted central catheter complications in neonates

OBJECTIVE

To determine factors associated with nonelective PICC removal and complications.

STUDY DESIGN

Overall, 1234 PICCs were placed in 918 hospitalized infants <45 weeks postmenstrual age. Outcomes studied include nonelective PICC removal (removal prior to completion of therapy) and line complications. Univariate and multivariate mixed-effects logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the associations between potential predictor variables and clinical outcomes RESULTS: Nonelective PICC removal occurred in 28.4% and complications in 34.4% of infants. Nonelective removal (p < 0.001) and complications (p = 0.006) occurred more often with upper than lower extremity PICCs. Malposition in the first 72 h (p = 0.0009) and over time (p = 0.0003) were more common in upper extremity PICCS; however, upper extremity PICCs were associated with a decreased incidence of phlebitis, edema, and perfusion changes (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one-third of PICCs were associated with complications. When feasible, lower extremity PICCs should be placed as they may be associated with fewer complications.

Percutaneous retrieval of fractured intravascular catheters in premature infants

BACKGROUND

Premature infants often require long-term indwelling intravascular catheters. Occasionally, catheters fracture and migrate into cardiovascular structures, risking perforation, infection, thrombosis, and interference with cardiac and valve function. This case series describes our experience with percutaneous retrieval of broken intravascular catheters.

METHODS

A gooseneck micro-snare was used to retrieve fractured catheters in four premature infants, weighing between 840 and 1930 grams.

RESULTS

All procedures were successful without complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Gooseneck-snare retrieval of broken indwelling intravascular catheters can be performed safely and successfully in premature infants even those that weigh less than 1000 grams.

Complications of upper extremity versus lower extremity placed peripherally inserted central catheters in neonatal intensive care units: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the risks of catheter-related complications between peripherally inserted central catheters placed via the upper and lower extremities in neonatal intensive care units.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

PUBMED, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to 3 January 2019. All studies were of patients in neonatal intensive care units who underwent insertion of peripherally inserted central catheters and were published in English.

RESULTS

Eight studies covering 4405 peripherally inserted central catheters were included. The upper extremity group was associated with a higher risk of non-elective removal (OR = 1.41; 95% 1.16-1.72; p = 0.0007) and malposition (OR = 4.52, 95% CI 2.16-9.47; p < 0.0001) and a lower risk of thrombosis (OR = 0.23, 95% CI 0.07-0.77; p = 0.02) compared with the lower extremity group. There was no significant difference in mechanical complications, catheter-related infection, or phlebitis.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis showed that the lower extremity group was not associated with worse outcomes compared with the upper extremity group in the neonatal intensive care unit, with the exception of thrombosis. However, further prospective randomised controlled studies are needed to ensure the quality of the results.

Umbilical Venous Catheters and Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: Are They Equally Safe in VLBW Infants? A Non-Randomized Single Center Study

Background and Objective: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) and umbilical venous catheters (UVC) are frequently used for vascular access in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). While there is a significant need for these devices for critically ill neonates, there are many complications associated with their use. We aimed at investigating the incidence of UVC and PICC complications in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. Materials and Methods: This is an observational study performed with neonates of the tertiary General Hospital of Piraeus, Greece, during an 18 month-period. Seventy-one neonates were recruited and divided into two groups: 34 neonates with PICC and 37 neonates with UVC. We recorded: Catheter dwell time, the causes of catheter removal, other complications, infections, and catheter tip colonization rates. Results: No significant statistical differences were noticed between the 2 study groups with regards to demographic characteristics, causes for catheter removal, catheter indwelling time or the incidence of nosocomial infection. Eleven UVC tips and no PICC tips were proved colonized (p = 0.001) following catheter removal. Conclusions: The incidence of complications associated with the use of UVCs and PICCs in VLBW infants did not significantly differ in our study. Their use seems to be equally safe. Further studies, with larger samples, are necessary to confirm our results.

Retrospective Cohort Analysis of Central Line Associated Blood Stream Infection following Introduction of a Central Line Bundle in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Background

Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI) constitute a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in neonatal populations. There has been an overwhelming increase in the use of evidence-based care practices, also known as bundles, in the reduction of these infections. In this report, rates of CLABSI and central line utilisation were examined following the introduction of a central line bundle in our Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) at the Canberra Hospital.

Methods

The research undertaken was a retrospective cohort study in which newborn infants admitted to the Canberra Hospital NICU between January 2011 and December 2016 and had a central line inserted were included in the study. Data regarding central line days, bed days, infection rates, and patient demographics were collected before and after the introduction of an intervention bundle. CLABSI rates were calculated per 1,000 central line days for before (2011-2013) and after (2014-2016) the introduction of the bundle. The postintervention period was retrospectively analysed for compliance, with data regarding the completion of maintenance forms and insertion forms collected.

Results

Overall, the results showed a significant decrease in CLABSI rates from 8.8 per 1,000 central line days to 4.9 per 1,000 central line days in the intervention period (p<0.001). Central line utilisation ratio (CLUR: ratio of central line days to bed days) was also reduced between pre- and postintervention periods, from 0.177 (4414/25013) to 0.13 (3633/27384; p<0.001). Compliance to insertion forms and maintenance forms was observed to increase within the intervention period.

Conclusion

The implementation of a central line bundle was effective in reducing both CLABSI rates and dwell time (CLUR) for central venous catheters.

Early planned removal versus expectant management of peripherally inserted central catheters to prevent infection in newborn infants

BACKGROUND

Duration of use may be a modifiable risk factor for central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infection in newborn infants. Early planned removal of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) is recommended as a strategy to reduce the incidence of infection and its associated morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of early planned removal of PICCs (up to two weeks after insertion) compared to an expectant approach or a longer fixed duration in preventing bloodstream infection and other complications in newborn infants.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2018, Issue 4), Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Maternity & Infant Care Database, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) (until April 2018), and conference proceedings and previous reviews.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials that assessed the effect of early planned removal of umbilical venous catheters (up to two weeks after insertion) compared to an expectant management approach or a longer fixed duration in preventing bloodstream infection and other complications in newborn infants.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors assessed trial eligibility independently. We planned to analyse any treatment effects in the individual trials and report the risk ratio and risk difference for dichotomous data and mean difference for continuous data, with respective 95% confidence intervals. We planned to use a fixed-effect model in meta-analyses and explore potential causes of heterogeneity in sensitivity analyses. We planned to assess the quality of evidence for the main comparison at the outcome level using "Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation" (GRADE) methods.

MAIN RESULTS

We did not identify any eligible randomised controlled trials.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There are no trial data to guide practice regarding early planned removal versus expectant management of PICCs in newborn infants. A simple and pragmatic randomised controlled trial is needed to resolve the uncertainty about optimal management in this common and important clinical dilemma.

Risk Factors Related to Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheter Nonselective Removal in Neonates

We aimed to investigate the incidence and risk factors associated with nonselective removal of peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) in neonates. In this prospective cohort study, neonates who underwent PICC placement at neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in China from October 2012 to November 2015 were included. The patient demographics, catheter characteristics, catheter duration, PICC insertion site, indication for PICC insertion, infuscate composition, PICC tip location, and catheter complications were recorded in a computerized database. Risk factors for nonselective removal were analyzed. A total of 497 PICCs were placed in 496 neonates. Nonselective removal occurred in 9.3% of PICCs during 10,540 catheter-days (4.6 nonselective removals per 1,000 catheter-days). These included occlusion (3%), infection (1.4%), leakage (2.0%), phlebitis (0.6%), displacement (1%), pleural effusion(0.6%), and breaks (0.6%). Noncentral tip position was independently associated with an increased risk of nonselective removal (odds ratio 2.621; 95% confidence interval, 1.258-5.461) after adjusting for gestational age, sex, birth weight, and PICC dwell time. No significant differences in the rate of complications occurred between silastic and polyurethane PICC or different insertion sites. Noncentral PICC tip position was the only independent risk factor for nonselective removal of PICC.

The intracavitary electrocardiography method for positioning the tip of epicutaneous cava catheter in neonates: Pilot study

Purpose:

The neonatologists of Sant’Anna and San Sebastiano Hospital of Caserta have carried out a pilot study investigating the safety, feasibility, and accuracy of intracavitary electrocardiography for neonatal epicutaneous cava catheter tip positioning.

Patients and methods:

We enrolled 39 neonates (1–28 days of postnatal age or correct age lower than 41 weeks) requiring epicutaneous cava catheter in the district of superior vena cava (head–neck or upper limbs). Intracavitary electrocardiography was applicable in 38 neonates.

Results:

No significant complications related to intracavitary electrocardiography occurred in the studied neonates. The increase in P wave on intracavitary electrocardiography was detected in 30 cases. Of the remaining eight cases, six malpositioned catheters tipped out of cavoatrial junction–target zone (chest x-ray and echocardiographical control) and two were false negative (tip located in target zone). The match between intracavitary electrocardiography and x-ray was observed in 29/38 cases, and the same ratio between intracavitary electrocardiography and echocardiography was detected.

Conclusion:

We conclude that the intracavitary electrocardiography method is safe and accurate in neonates as demonstrated in pediatric and adult patients. The applicability of the method is 97% and its feasibility is 79%. The overall accuracy is 76% but it rises to 97% if “peak” P wave is detected.

2% chlorhexidine-70% isopropyl alcohol versus 10% povidone-iodine for insertion site cleaning before central line insertion in preterm infants: a randomised trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether 2% chlorhexidine gluconate-70% isopropyl alcohol (CHX-IA) is superior to 10% aqueous povidone-iodine (PI) in preventing catheter-related blood stream infection (CR-BSI) when used to clean insertion sites before placing central venous catheters (CVCs) in preterm infants.

DESIGN

Randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Two neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).

PATIENTS

Infants <31 weeks' gestation who had a CVC inserted.

INTERVENTIONS

Insertion site was cleaned with CHX-IA or PI. Caregivers were not masked to group assignment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome was CR-BSI determined by one microbiologist who was masked to group assignment. Secondary outcomes included skin reactions to study solution and thyroid dysfunction.

RESULTS

We enrolled 304 infants (CHX-IA 148 vs PI 156) in whom 815 CVCs (CHX-IA 384 vs PI 431) were inserted and remained in situ for 3078 (CHX-IA 1465 vs PI 1613) days. We found no differences between the groups in the proportion of infants with CR-BSI (CHX-IA 7% vs PI 5%, p=0.631), the proportion of CVCs complicated by CR-BSI or the rate of CR-BSI per 1000 catheter days. Skin reaction rates were low (<1% CVC insertion episodes) and not different between the groups. More infants in the PI group had raised thyroid-stimulating hormone levels and were treated with thyroxine (CHX-IA 0% vs PI 5%, p=0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

We did not find a difference in the rate of CR-BSI between preterm infants treated with CHX-IA and PI, and more infants treated with PI had thyroid dysfunction. However, our study was not adequately powered to detect a difference in our primary outcome and a larger trial is required to confirm our findings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered with the EU clinical trials register before the first patient was enrolled (Eudract 2011-002962-19). (https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu).

Perforations associated with peripherally inserted central catheters in a neonatal population

BACKGROUND

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are increasingly used in neonates but perforations can result in devastating complications such as pericardial and pleural effusions. Identifying risk factors may guide surveillance and reduce morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the risk factors for PICC perforation in neonates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective case:control (1:2) study of neonates admitted between 2004-2014. Charts and imaging were reviewed for clinical and therapeutic risk factors.

RESULTS

Among 3,454 PICCs, 15 cases of perforation (incidence 0.4%, 5 pericardial effusions, 10 pleural effusions) were matched to 30 controls, based on gestation and insertion date. Timing of perforations post-insertion was median 4 days for pericardial effusions and 21.5 days for pleural effusions. A risk factor for pericardial effusion was lower weight at PICC insertion compared with controls. There were no statistically significant differences between cases and controls in catheter material, insertion site, PICC size and lumen number. Among upper limb PICCs, pericardial effusions were associated with tip positions more proximal to the heart at insertion (P=0.005) and at perforation (P=0.008), compared with controls. Pleural effusions were associated with tip positions more distal from the heart at perforation (P=0.008). Within 48 h before perforation, high/medium risk infusions included total parenteral nutrition (100% cases vs. 56.7% controls, P=0.002) and vancomycin (60% cases vs. 23.3% controls, P=0.02).

CONCLUSION

PICC-associated pericardial effusions and pleural effusions are rare but inherent risks and can occur at any time after insertion. Risk factors and etiologies are multifactorial, but PICC tip position may be a modifiable risk factor. To mitigate this risk, we have developed and disseminated guidelines for target PICC positions and routinely do radiographs to monitor PICCs for migration and malposition in our NICU. The increased knowledge of risk profiles from this study has helped focus surveillance efforts and facilitate early recognition and treatment.

Confirming longline position in neonates - Survey of practice in England and Wales

AIM

To establish how neonatal units in England and Wales currently confirm longline tip position, immediately after insertion of a longline.

METHODS

We conducted a telephone survey of 170 neonatal units (37 special care baby units, 81 local neonatal units and 52 neonatal intensive care units) across England and Wales over the period from January to May 2016. Data was collected on specifically designed proformas. We gathered information on the following: Unit Level designation; whether the unit used longlines and specific type used? Modality used to confirm longline tip position? Whether guide wires were routinely removed and contrast injected to determine longline position? The responders were primarily senior nurses.

RESULTS

We had 100% response rate. Out of the total neonatal units surveyed (170) in England and Wales, 141 units (83%) used longlines. Fifty-five out of 81 local neonatal units (68%) using longlines, used ones that came with guide wires; a similar percentage of neonatal intensive care units, i.e., 31 out of 52 units (60%) did the same. All of those units used radiography, plain X-rays, to establish longline tip position. Out of 55 local neonatal units using longlines with guide wires, 42 (76%) were not removing wire to use contrast while this figure was 58% (18 out of 31 units) for neonatal intensive care units. Overall, only 49 out of 141 units (35%) of the units using longlines were using contrast. However it was interesting to note that use of contrast increased as one moved from special care baby units (25%, 2 out of 8 units) to local neonatal units (28%, 23 out of 81 units) and neonatal intensive care units level (46%, 24 out of 52 units) designation.

CONCLUSION

Neonatal units in England and Wales are overwhelmingly relying on plain radiographs to assess longline tip position immediately after insertion. Despite evidence of its usefulness, and in the absence of perhaps more accurate methods of assessing longline tip position in a reliable and consistent way, i.e., ultrasonography, contrast is only used in a third of units.

Neonatal Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Practices and Providers: Results From the Neonatal PICC1 Survey

BACKGROUND

Neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) commonly utilize peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) to provide nutrition and long-term medications to premature and full-term infants. However, little is known about PICC practices in these settings.

PURPOSE

To assess PICC practices, policies, and providers in NICUs.

METHODS

The Neonatal PICC1 Survey was conducted through the use of the electronic mailing list of a national neonatal professional organization's electronic membership community. Questions addressed PICC-related policies, monitoring, practices, and providers. Descriptive statistics were used to assess results.

RESULTS

Of the 156 respondents accessing the survey, 115 (73.7%) indicated that they placed PICCs as part of their daily occupation. Of these, 110 responded to at least one question (70.5%) and were included in the study. Reported use of evidence-based practices by NICU providers varied. For example, routine use of maximum sterile barriers was reported by 90.4% of respondents; however, the use of chlorhexidine gluconate for skin disinfection was reported only by 49.4% of respondents. A majority of respondents indicated that trained PICC nurses were largely responsible for routine PICC dressing changes (61.0%). Normal saline was reported as the most frequently used flushing solution (46.3%). The most common PICC-related complications in neonates were catheter migration and occlusion.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Variable practices, including the use of chlorhexidine-based solutions for skin disinfection and inconsistent flushing, exist. There is a need for development of consistent monitoring to improve patient outcomes.

IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH

Future research should include exploration of specific PICC practices, associated conditions, and outcomes.

Risk factors for central venous catheter-related thrombosis in children: a retrospective analysis

Central venous catheter (CVC) placement is associated with increased risk of thrombosis in the paediatric population, particularly in relation to the type of catheter and the manner of its insertion. Here, we investigate risk factors associated with CVC-related thrombosis in children, with particular emphasis on positioning of the catheter tip. Patients aged 0-18 who underwent at least one CVC placement from 2008 to 2013 at a single centre with a subsequent follow-up echocardiogram were included for a total of 104 patients and 147 lines. Data on clinical and catheter-related risk factors were collected from patient charts. Statistical analysis using Pearson's χ tests, independent samples t-test, and odds ratios were used to assess potential risk factors for thrombosis. Neither insertion site (subclavian vein or otherwise), left- vs. right-sided insertion, nor catheter type were significant risk factors for thrombosis. There were no thrombotic events reported at the superior vena cava (SVC)-right atrium junction and no significant differences in thrombotic risk with initial tip placement in the SVC-right atrium junction vs. the SVC, right atrium, or inferior vena cava. Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia was a major clinical risk factor for thrombosis. Tip movement was common and may have been an important factor in the development of CVC-related thrombi. Prospective studies can yield insight into the role of follow-up imaging in the prevention of catheter-related thrombosis in children.

Parenteral Nutrition Solution in Cerebrospinal Fluid in Preterm Newborn – a Case Report and Review of the Literature

Introduction

Percutaneously inserted central venous catheters (epicutaneo-cava-catheter - ECC) are widely used in neonatal intensive care, facilitating the parenteral nutrition and the treatment of critically ill newborns. This invasive procedure is regarded as safe and associated with low complication rate. Possible life-threatening complications may result from malpositioning of ECC. Paraspinal misplacement of ECC is one of the most serious complications.

Case Presentation

The authors report a case of misplacement of ECC inserted via left saphenous vein for intravenous feeding. A plane radiograph performed after the procedure showed the line tip at L3-L4 level, supposed to indicate location of the catheter in the vena cava inferior. Three days later, the infant developed neurologic symptoms (lethargy, hypotonia, seizures). Lumbar puncture revealed milky fluid containing parenteral nutrition solution. The infusion was stopped. X-ray with contrast showed the catheterization of the left ascending lumbar vein draining the vertebral venous plexuses. The contrast was highlighting the epidural space. The line was immediately removed resulting in improvement in patient's condition and resolution of all neurological symptoms. There was no sequela of this infiltration and the baby had an uneventful recovery. Follow-up at the age of 12 months showed normal development.

Conclusions

A percutaneous catheter inserted via a lower limb may inadvertently enter the ascending lumbar vein. As previously reported, a catheter inserted via the left lower limb is a risk factor of this malposition. The life-threatening complications may be avoided by careful verification of ECC position (lateral x-ray, contrast examination). Plain radiography alone may not be sufficient for tip localization.

Heparin for the treatment of thrombosis in neonates

BACKGROUND

Among pediatric patients, newborns are at highest risk of developing thromboembolism. Neonatal thromboembolic (TE) events may consist of both venous and arterial thromboses and often iatrogenic complications (eg, central catheterization). Treatment guidelines for pediatric patients with TE events most often are extrapolated from the literature regarding adults. Options for the management of neonatal TE events include expectant management; nitroglycerin ointment; thrombolytic therapy or anticoagulant therapy, or a combination of the two; and surgery. Since the 1990s, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) has become the neonatal anticoagulant of choice. Reasons for its appeal include predictable dose response, no need for venous access, and limited monitoring requirements. The overall major complication rate is around 5%. Whether preterm infants are at increased risk is unclear. No data are available on the frequency of osteoporosis, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), or other hypersensitivity reactions in children and neonates exposed to LMWH.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether heparin treatment (both unfractionated heparin [UFH] and LMWH) reduces mortality and morbidity rates in preterm and term newborn infants with diagnosed thrombosis. The intervention is compared with placebo or no treatment. Also, to assess the safety of heparin therapy (both UFH and LMWH) for potential harms.Subgroup analyses were planned to examine gestational age, birth weight, mode of thrombus diagnosis, presence of a central line, positive family history for genetic disorders (thrombophilia, deficiency of protein S and protein C, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase [MTHFR] mutation), route of heparin administration, type of heparin used, and location of thrombus (see "Subgroup analysis and investigation of heterogeneity").

SEARCH METHODS

We used the standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group to search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2016, Issue 4), MEDLINE via PubMed (1966 to May 9, 2016), Embase (1980 to May 9, 2016), and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL; 1982 to May 9, 2016). We searched clinical trials databases, conference proceedings, and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomized controlled trials and quasi-randomized trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized, quasi-randomized, and cluster-randomized controlled trials comparing heparin versus placebo or no treatment in preterm and term neonates with a diagnosis of thrombosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used the standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. Two review authors independently assessed studies identified by the search strategy for inclusion.

MAIN RESULTS

Our search strategy yielded 1160 references. Two review authors independently assessed all references for inclusion. We found no completed studies and no ongoing trials for inclusion.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found no studies that met our inclusion criteria and no evidence from randomized controlled trials to recommend or refute the use of heparin for treatment of neonates with thrombosis.

[Catheter tip position and risk of mechanical complications in a neonatal unit]

INTRODUCTION

The use of central catheters (CC) is associated with mechanical complications (MC).

OBJECTIVE

Our objetive was to determine the relationship between CC positions and associated MC in neonates.

MATERIAL

A descriptive analytical study was performed over a six year period in the NICU of the University Hospital Santa Lucía de Cartagena. Details were collected on the CC used, indication, reason for withdrawal, position in the imaging, MC, and treatment arising from them, as well as epidemiological data.

RESULTS

Of the total of 604 CC studied, the majority (347) were via the umbilical vein, followed by epicutaneous (193), and femoral vein (34). There were MC in 14.2% of catheters. Incorrect position of the tip was associated with greater MC (21.1 vs 8.2%; P<.001), including withdrawal due to MC (8.4 vs 3.1%; P<.01), extravasation (4.9 vs 1.9%; P<.05), pleural and pericardial effusions (1.4 vs 0.0%; P<.05), liver haematomas (4.6 vs 0.6%; P<.01), and ascites (2.8 vs 0.0%; P<.01). The midclavicular epicutaneous position of the tip was associated with greater MC (18.5 vs 6.8%; P<.05) than the brachiocephalic (0 vs 6.8%;NS). The low and ductal position of the umbilical vein catheter was also associated with higher rates of MC (24.5 vs 6%; P<.001 and 27 vs 6%; P<.001) due to the position of the tip. The most common complication was accidentally dislodged catheter.

CONCLUSIONS

The incorrect location of the tip was associated with more MC. The midclavicular epicutaneous had more risk than centrally or brachiocephalic locations. The low and ductal positions of the umbilical vein catheter were associated with higher rates of MC.

Impact of a Central Line Infection Prevention Bundle in Newborn Infants

OBJECTIVE To compare central line use and central line-associated bloodstream infection in newborn infants before and after the introduction of a central line infection prevention bundle in order to determine the effectiveness of the bundle and to identify areas for further improvement. DESIGN Retrospective cohort analysis of prospectively collected data. SETTING Level 5 neonatal intensive care unit in Sydney, Australia. PATIENTS Newborn infants admitted to the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Neonatal Intensive Care Unit who had a central venous catheter (CVC) inserted. METHODS Data regarding clinical characteristics, CVC use, and infection were collected before and after the introduction of a bundle of interventions. The bundles encompassed (1) insertion of CVC, (2) maintenance of CVC, (3) an education program, and (4) ongoing surveillance and feedback. RESULTS Baseline and intervention groups were comparable in clinical characteristics. The number of CVCs inserted was reduced in the intervention group (central line utilization rate, 0.16 vs 0.2, P<.0001). Overall CVC dwell time was reduced, resulting from significant reduction in peripherally inserted CVC dwell time (6 days [95% CI, 5.0-11.8 days] vs 7.3 days [4.0-10.4 days], P=.0004). Central line-associated bloodstream infections were significantly reduced, predominantly secondary to decreased peripherally inserted CVC-related bloodstream infections (1.2/1,000 central line-days vs 11.5/1,000 central line-days, P<.0001). CONCLUSION This central line infection bundle was effective in reducing CVC use, dwell time, and central line-associated bloodstream infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:1029-1036.

Early removal versus expectant management of central venous catheters in neonates with bloodstream infection

BACKGROUND

Uncertainty exists regarding the management of newborn infants with a bloodstream infection and a central venous catheter in place. The central venous catheter may act as a nidus for infecting organisms and observational studies have suggested that early removal of the catheter is associated with a lower incidence of persistent or complicated infection. However, since central venous catheters provide secure vascular access to deliver nutrition and medications, the possible harms of early removal versus expectant management also need to be considered.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of early removal versus expectant management of central venous catheters on morbidity and mortality in newborn infants with bloodstream infections.

SEARCH METHODS

We used the standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. This included searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2015, Issue 11), MEDLINE (1966 to October 2015), EMBASE (1980 to October 2015), CINAHL (1982 to October 2015), conference proceedings and previous reviews.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials that compared early removal versus expectant management of central venous catheters in neonates with bloodstream infections.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used the standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group.

MAIN RESULTS

We did not identify any eligible randomised controlled trials.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There are no trial data to guide practice regarding early removal versus expectant management of central venous catheters in newborn infants with bloodstream infections. A simple and pragmatic randomised controlled trial is needed to resolve the uncertainty about optimal management in this common and important clinical scenario.

Percutaneous central venous catheters versus peripheral cannulae for delivery of parenteral nutrition in neonates

BACKGROUND

Neonatal parenteral nutrition may be delivered via peripheral cannulas or central venous catheters (umbilical or percutaneous). As the result of complications associated with umbilical catheters, many neonatal units prefer to use percutaneous catheters after initial stabilisation. Although they can be difficult to place, these catheters may be more stable than peripheral cannulae and require less frequent replacement. These delivery methods may be associated with different risks of adverse events, including acquired invasive infection and extravasation injury.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of infusion of parenteral nutrition via percutaneous central venous catheters versus peripheral cannulae on nutrient input, growth and development and complications among hospitalised neonates receiving parenteral nutrition in terms of adverse consequences such as bacteraemia or invasive fungal infection, cardiac tamponade or other extravasation injuries.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2015, Issue 5), MEDLINE (1966 to June 2015) and EMBASE (1980 to June 2015), as well as conference proceedings and previous reviews.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials that compared delivery of intravenous fluids (primarily parenteral nutrition) via percutaneous central venous catheters versus peripheral cannulae in hospitalised neonates.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We extracted data using standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Group, with separate evaluation of trial quality and data extraction by two review authors.

MAIN RESULTS

We found six trials recruiting a total of 549 infants. One trial showed that use of a percutaneous central venous catheter was associated with a smaller deficit between prescribed and actual nutrient intake during the trial period (mean difference (MD) -7.1%, 95% confidence interval (CI) -11.02 to -3.2). Infants in the percutaneous central venous catheter group needed significantly fewer catheters/cannulae (MD -4.3, 95% CI -5.24, -3.43). Meta-analysis of data from all trials revealed no evidence of an effect on the incidence of invasive infection (typical risk ratio (RR) 0.95, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.25; typical risk difference (RD) -0.01, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.06).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Data from one small trial suggest that use of percutaneous central venous catheters to deliver parenteral nutrition increases nutrient input. The significance of this in relation to long-term growth and developmental outcomes is unclear. Three trials suggest that use of percutaneous central venous catheters decreases the number of catheters/cannulae needed to deliver nutrition. No evidence suggests that percutaneous central venous catheter use increases risks of adverse events, particularly invasive infection, although none of the included trials was large enough to rule out an effect on uncommon severe adverse events such as pericardial effusion.

Antimicrobial-impregnated central venous catheters for prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infection in newborn infants

BACKGROUND

Central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection is an important cause of mortality and morbidity in newborn infants cared for in neonatal units. Potential strategies to prevent these infections include the use of central venous catheters impregnated with antimicrobial agents.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of antimicrobial-impregnated central venous catheters in preventing catheter-related bloodstream infection in newborn infants.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2015, Issue 8), MEDLINE (1966 to September 2015), EMBASE (1980 to September 2015), CINAHL (1982 to September 2015), conference proceedings and previous reviews.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing central venous catheters impregnated or coated with any antibiotic or antiseptic versus central venous catheters without antibiotic or antiseptic coating or impregnation in newborn infants.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We extracted data using the standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Group, with independent evaluation of risk of bias and data extraction by two review authors.

MAIN RESULTS

We found only one small trial (N = 98). This trial found that silver zeolite-impregnated umbilical venous catheters reduced the incidence of bloodstream infection in very preterm infants (risk ratio 0.11, 95% confidence interval 0.01 to 0.87; risk difference -0.17, 95% CI -0.30 to -0.04; number needed to treat for benefit 6, 95% CI 3 to 25].

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Although the data from one small trial indicates that antimicrobial-impregnated central venous catheters might prevent catheter-related bloodstream infection in newborn infants, the available evidence is insufficient to guide clinical practice. A large, simple and pragmatic randomised controlled trial is needed to resolve on-going uncertainty.

Thrombosis in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Neonates have the highest risk for pathologic thrombosis among pediatric patients. A combination of genetic and acquired risk factors significantly contributes to this risk, with the most important risk factor being the use of central venous catheters. Proper imaging is critical for confirming the diagnosis. Despite a significant number of these events being life- and limb-threatening, there is limited evidence on what the appropriate management strategy should be. Evaluation and treatment of any neonate with a clinically significant thrombosis should occur at a tertiary referral center that has proper support.

Antibiotic lock for the prevention of catheter-related infection in neonates

BACKGROUND

Use of a central venous catheter (CVC) in neonates is associated with an increase in nosocomial infection. Numerous strategies exist to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI); however, CRBSI continues to be a major problem. Antibiotic locking catheters is a new and promising treatment that potentially prevents this severe condition.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of antibiotic lock versus no antibiotic lock or alternative antibiotic lock in the prevention of catheter-related infections in newborn infants of any gestational age during their initial stay in the neonatal unit and to study any relevant adverse effects from antibiotic lock therapy.

SEARCH METHODS

Methods followed those of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group (CNRG). We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2014, Issue 5); MEDLINE (via PubMed); EMBASE (hosted by EBCHOST); CINAHL; abstracts from Pediatric Academic Societies, European Society for Paediatric Research and trials registries; and references cited in our short listed articles using keywords and MeSH headings, up to April 2015.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered all trials utilising random or quasi-random participant allocation. Participants included all newborn infants of any postmenstrual age who required any type of CVC. We compared an antibiotic lock technique with no antibiotic lock or placebo, such as heparinised saline, for any duration of time.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We extracted data using the standard methods of the CNRG. Two review authors independently assessed the relevance and risk of bias of the retrieved records. We expressed our dichotomous results using risk ratio (RR) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed for heterogeneity using the I(2) statistic.

MAIN RESULTS

We included three trials (271 infants) in this review. Two of the three included studies had an overall low risk of bias and the remaining study had high risk of selection and performance biases. The use of an antibiotic lock decreased the incidence of confirmed catheter-related infection (typical RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.40; 3 studies, 271 infants) (high-quality evidence). The typical absolute risk reduction (ARR) was 18.5% and the number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) was 5. The effect of use of an antibiotic lock on suspected catheter infection was imprecise (typical RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.92) (moderate quality evidence). Confirmed and suspect infection rates combined were lower in the antibiotic lock group (absolute rates, RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.49; rate per 1000 catheter days, RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.40). The ARR was 20.5% and the NNTB was 5. None of the studies report resistance to the antibiotic used during the lock treatment. There was no significant difference in the detectable serum levels of antibiotic. When the data from two studies were pooled, there were significantly fewer episodes of hypoglycaemia in the treatment arm (typical RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.92). There was no statistically significant difference for mortality due to sepsis between the control and intervention group.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on a small number of trials and neonates, antibiotic lock solution appeared to be effective in preventing CRBSI in the neonatal population. However, as each included study used a different antibiotics and antibiotic resistance could not be reliably assessed, the evidence to-date is insufficient to determine the effects of antibiotic lock on infections in neonates.

Using a modified Seldinger technique is an effective way of placing femoral venous catheters in critically ill infants

AIM

Femoral venous catheters (FVCs) provide multilumen access in critically ill infants with difficult venous access. This study reports our experiences of using a modified Seldinger technique to insert FVCs in our neonatal unit.

METHODS

This was a retrospective case series of 34 infants who had FVCs inserted using the modified Seldinger technique during a 4-year period.

RESULTS

The median (range) post-natal age and weight at the time of insertion were 66 days (1-314) and 3080 g (865-8000). The FVC remained in situ for a median duration of 21 days (1-63). There were nine infants who died while the FVC remained in situ. The FVCs were removed from four infants due to complications. In three cases, they became dislodged, and in one case, the line became blocked. In 16 infants, the FVC was removed when it was no longer required and one infant was transferred out of the unit with the FVC in situ. Transient venous congestion of the distal limb occurred in four infants. In one infant, the FVC was accidently placed in the femoral artery and removed without complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Femoral venous catheter insertion using a modified Seldinger technique appeared to provide alternate and immediate central venous access in critically ill infants.

Cardiac tamponade secondary to perforation of innominate vein following central line insertion in a neonate

Cardiac tamponade following central line in a neonate is rare and an uncommon situation; however, it is potentially reversible when it is diagnosed in time. We report a case of cardiac tamponade following central line insertion. A 10-day-old 2.2 kg girl operated for obstructed total anomalous pulmonary venous connections had neckline slipped out during extubation. Attempted cannulations of right femoral vein were unsuccessful. At the end of the left internal jugular vein cannulaton, there was a sudden cardiorespiratory arrest. Immediate transthoracic echocardiogram showed left pleural and pericardial collection. Chest was opened and the catheter tip was seen in the thoracic cavity after puncturing the innominate vein. The catheter was removed and the vent was repaired.

Cardiac tamponade in a neonate: a dreadful condition--need for functional echo

Cardiac tamponade is a clinical emergency. Detection of a swinging heart rate is one of the earliest markers of large pericardial effusion, in which the four cardiac chambers are free to float in a phasic manner. We present a case of a preterm baby, one of the twins, who developed sudden onset of deterioration in the form of swinging heart rate, fluctuation in blood pressure and desaturation, requiring emergency intubation and inotropic support. Bedside functional echo was performed, which demonstrated cardiac tamponade; an immediate echocardiography-guided tap was initiated and fluid was aspirated from the pericardial space.

Neonatal peripherally inserted central catheter practices and their association with demographics, training, and radiographic monitoring: results from a national survey

The goal of this secondary analysis of results from a national survey of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) practices in neonates was to determine whether demographics and types of training were associated with differing radiographic confirmation practices of these catheters. Correlational analyses were performed on the 2010 national database of neonatal PICC practices. The sample consisted of 187 respondents, representing 25% of the level III neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) of more than 20 beds in the United States. The key factors examined were geographic location, size of NICU, academic affiliation, and type of training related to radiographic confirmation of the catheter tip position, routine monitoring and reconfirmation of the catheter tip position following adjustments, and associated patient positioning practices for consistent evaluation of the catheter tip position. Formal training and annual retraining were statistically significantly associated with consistent patient positioning practices for more accurate monitoring of the catheter tip position and acceptable tip location. Size of NICU and academic affiliation were not associated with differences in practices. Adherence to specific national guidelines and recommendations for care of infants with PICCs is significantly impacted by formal training and annual retraining. This underscores the importance of education and annual retraining in preventing PICC-related complications beyond the crucial prevention of central line-associated bloodstream infections.

Prevention of central venous catheter-related infection in the neonatal unit: a literature review

Central venous catheter infections are the leading cause of healthcare-associated bloodstream infections and contribute significantly to mortality and morbidity in neonatal intensive care units. Moreover, infection poses significant economic consequence which increased hospital costs and increased length of hospital stay. Prevention strategies are detailed in guidelines published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the United States; nevertheless, recent surveys in neonatal units in the United States, and Australia and New Zealand demonstrate these are not always followed. This review discusses the numerous evidence-based strategies to prevent catheter infections including hand hygiene, maximal sterile barriers during insertion, skin disinfection, selection of insertion site, dressings, aseptic non-touch technique, disinfection of catheter hubs/ports, administration set management, prompt removal of catheter, antibiotic locks, systemic antibiotic prophylaxis and chlorhexidine bathing. Furthermore, it will describe different strategies that can be implemented into clinical practice to reduce infection rates. These include the use of care bundles including checklists, education and the use of CVC teams.

Greater saphenous venous access as an alternative in children

BACKGROUND

In the pediatric population, obtaining venous access in high-risk neonates, severely ill children with cardiac anomalies or very young children (<10 kg) can be very challenging. In the literature to date, the greater saphenous vein has not been primarily used by interventional radiologists as an entry site for venous access in children.

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the utility and effectiveness of using the greater saphenous vein as a venous access site for the placement of peripherally inserted central catheters in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study from a large tertiary care children's hospital from November 2010 to August 2012. Peripheral insertion of central venous catheters (PICC) using the greater saphenous vein was attempted in 86 children ranging in age from 3 days to 17 years (mean: 1.8 years). Indications included congenital heart disease, urinary tract infection, intravenous access, pneumonia, meningitis, total parenteral nutrition, sepsis and other infections. All procedures were performed by interventional radiologists. No insertion-related complications were identified. There was no follow-up planning, but no mechanical or infectious complications were brought to our attention.

RESULTS

Of the 86 patients in whom PICC placement was attempted, placement was successful in 67 (78%). Forty-two PICCs were placed in the greater saphenous vein at the thigh level using US guidance and 25 at the ankle level using anatomical landmarks. The mean weight of the 67 patients who underwent successful placement was 9.98 kg, with 51 (76%) weighing <10 kg. The mean vessel diameter in placement failures was 1.35 mm compared to 1.83 mm in successful placement. Inability to obtain venous access was the cause of failure in all thigh access sites while inability to advance the catheter centrally was the cause of failure for all ankle access sites. A total of 1,060 catheter days (with a maximum dwell time of 97 days in one patient) were reviewed without complication.

CONCLUSION

In children, the greater saphenous vein provides a safe, suitable alternative for venous access, particularly in very young children (<10 kg) and in a select group of older children who are not mobile. In the lower extremities, greater saphenous venous puncture and access may be a preferred initial access site in small children to preserve future venous access.