Incidents and errors in neonatal intensive care: a review of the literature

Voluntary Neonatal Medication Incident Reporting-A Single Centre Retrospective Analysis

Background: Medication errors in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) are prevalent, with dosage and prescription errors being the most common. Aims: To identify the common medication errors reported over twelve years using a voluntary, nonanonymous incident reporting system (RiskMan clinical incident reporting information system) at an Australian tertiary NICU. Methods: This was a single-centre cohort study conducted at a tertiary NICU. All medication-related incidents (errors) reported prospectively through the RiskMan online voluntary reporting database from January 2010 to December 2021 were included. The medication incidents were grouped into administration, prescription, pharmacy-related, and others, which included the remaining uncommon incidents. Results: Over the study period, 583 medication errors were reported, including administration-related (41.3%), prescription-related (24.5%), pharmacy-related (10.1%), and other errors (24%). Most incidents were reported by nursing and midwifery staff (77%) and pharmacists (17.5%). Most outcomes were minor or insignificant (98%), with only a few resulting in major or significant harm. There was one extreme incident that may have contributed to the death of a neonate and nine moderate incidents. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that medication errors are common and highlight the need to support improvement initiatives and implement existing evidence-based interventions in routine practice to minimise medication errors in the NICU.

Multifaceted Intervention to Improve Patient Safety Incident Reporting in Intensive Care Units

OBJECTIVES

Patient safety incident reporting in our institution's intensive care units (ICUs) had fallen 30% below national benchmarks during the COVID-19 pandemic. Underreporting diminishes awareness of risks and precludes organizational learning from near misses. We aimed to increase the ICU number of patient safety incident reports by 30% from 27 to 35 reports/1000 patient-days without negatively impacting culture of safety as measured by patient-care staff surveys.

METHODS

Single-institution prospective interventional study with 9 ICUs receiving a multifaceted intervention developed using quality improvement methodology during February-April 2022. Study intervention involved creation of patient safety peer-leadership role, feedback process, interactive dashboards for patient safety data, and education resources accessible via quick response codes. Primary outcome was patient safety incident reports/1000 patient-days. Intensive care unit patient-care staff culture of safety was assessed with surveys.

RESULTS

Intensive care unit patient safety incident reporting increased by 48% after intervention (40 versus 27 reports/1000 patient-days [ P = 0.136]). Near misses were the most common incident report. Intensive care unit patient-care staff ratings of patient safety did not change; 80% rated patient safety as good or better after intervention versus 78% at baseline ( P = 0.465). However, significant improvement was observed for subcomponents related to learning culture and support for staff involved in patient safety incidents. Most reports (>80%) were submitted by nurses.

CONCLUSIONS

This multifaceted quality improvement intervention increased patient safety incident reporting in the ICUs. Increases in ratings of learning culture and support for staff underline the importance of a well-functioning patient safety incident reporting system in an institutional culture of safety.

An umbrella review of systematic reviews on contributory factors to medication errors in health-care settings

INTRODUCTION

Medication errors are common events that compromise patient safety and are prevalent in all health-care settings. This umbrella review aims to systematically evaluate the evidence on contributory factors to medication errors in health-care settings in terms of the nature of these factors, methodologies and theories used to identify and classify them, and the terminologies and definitions used to describe them.

AREAS COVERED

Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched from inception to March 2022. The data extraction form was derived from the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Reviewers' Manual, and critical appraisal was conducted using the JBI quality assessment tool. A narrative approach to data synthesis was adopted.

EXPERT OPINION

Twenty-seven systematic reviews were included, most of which focused on a specific health-care setting or clinical area. Decision-making mistakes such as non-consideration of patient risk factors most commonly led to error, followed by organizational and environmental factors (e.g. understaffing and distractions). Only 10 studies had a pre-specified methodology to classify contributory factors, among which the use of theory, specifically Reason's theory was commonly used. None of the reviews evaluated the effectiveness of interventions in preventing errors. The collated contributory factors identified in this umbrella review can inform holistic theory-based intervention development.

Prevalence, Causes and Severity of Medication Administration Errors in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Neonates are at greater risk of preventable adverse drug events as compared to children and adults.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to estimate and critically appraise the evidence on the prevalence, causes and severity of medication administration errors (MAEs) amongst neonates in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs).

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted by searching nine electronic databases and the grey literature for studies, without language and publication date restrictions. The pooled prevalence of MAEs was estimated using a random-effects model. Data on error causation were synthesised using Reason's model of accident causation.

RESULTS

Twenty unique studies were included. Amongst direct observation studies reporting total opportunity for errors as the denominator for MAEs, the pooled prevalence was 59.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 35.4-81.3, I² = 99.5%). Whereas, the non-direct observation studies reporting medication error reports as the denominator yielded a pooled prevalence of 64.8% (95% CI 46.6-81.1, I² = 98.2%). The common reported causes were error-provoking environments (five studies), while active failures were reported by three studies. Only three studies examined the severity of MAEs, and each utilised a different method of assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis estimating the prevalence, causes and severity of MAEs amongst neonates. There is a need to improve the quality and reporting of studies to produce a better estimate of the prevalence of MAEs amongst neonates. Important targets such as wrong administration-technique, wrong drug-preparation and wrong time errors have been identified to guide the implementation of remedial measures.

An educational programme in neonatal intensive care units (SEPREVEN): a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Patients in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) are at high risk of adverse events. The effects of medical and paramedical education programmes to reduce these have not yet been assessed.

METHODS

In this multicentre, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial done in France, we randomly assigned 12 NICUs to three clusters of four units. Eligible neonates were inpatients in a participating unit for at least 2 days, with a postmenstrual age of 42 weeks or less on admission. Each cluster followed a 4-month multifaceted programme including education about root-cause analysis and care bundles. The primary outcome was the rate of adverse events per 1000 patient-days, measured with a retrospective trigger-tool based chart review masked to allocation of randomly selected files. Analyses used mixed-effects Poisson modelling that adjusted for time. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02598609.

FINDINGS

Between Nov 23, 2015, and Nov 2, 2017, event rates were analysed for 3454 patients of these 12 NICUs for 65 830 patient-days. The event rate per 1000 patient-days reduced significantly from the control to the intervention period (33·9 vs 22·6; incidence rate ratio 0·67; 95% CI 0·50-0·88; p=0·0048).

INTERPRETATION

A multiprofessional safety-promoting programme in NICUs reduced the rate of adverse events and severe and preventable adverse events in highly vulnerable patients. This programme could significantly improve care offered to critically ill neonates.

FUNDING

Solidarity and Health Ministry, France.

Fatal accidental lipid overdose with intravenous composite lipid emulsion in a premature newborn: a case report

BACKGROUND

Tenfold or more overdose of a drug or preparation is a dreadful adverse event in neonatology, often due to an error in programming the infusion pump flow rate. Lipid overdose is exceptional in this context and has never been reported during the administration of a composite intravenous lipid emulsion (ILE).

CASE PRESENTATION

Twenty-four hours after birth, a 30 weeks' gestation infant with a birthweight of 930 g inadvertently received 28 ml of a composite ILE over 4 h. The ILE contained 50% medium-chain triglycerides and 50% soybean oil, corresponding to 6 g/kg of lipids (25 mg/kg/min). The patient developed acute respiratory distress with echocardiographic markers of pulmonary hypertension and was treated with inhaled nitric oxide and high-frequency oscillatory ventilation. Serum triglyceride level peaked at 51.4 g/L, 17 h after the lipid overload. Triple-volume exchange transfusion was performed twice, decreasing the triglyceride concentration to < 10 g/L. The infant's condition remained critical, with persistent bleeding and shock despite supportive treatment and peritoneal dialysis. Death occurred 69 h after the overdose in a context of refractory lactic acidosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Massive ILE overdose is life-threatening in the early neonatal period, particularly in premature and hypotrophic infants. This case highlights the vigilance required when ILEs are administered separately from other parenteral intakes. Exchange transfusion should be considered at the first signs of clinical or biological worsening to avoid progression to multiple organ failure.

Study on preventing adverse events in neonates (SEPREVEN): A stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial to reduce adverse event rates in the NICU

INTRODUCTION

Adverse events (AE) in care are recognized as a leading cause of mortality and injury in patients. Improving patients' safety is difficult to achieve. Therefore, innovative research strategies are needed to identify errors in subgroups of patients and related severity of outcomes as well as reliably measured efficiency of reproducible strategies to improve safety. This trial aims to evaluate the impact of a combined multiprofessional education program on the rate of AE in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial with 3 clusters each containing 4 units. The study time period will be 20 months. The education program will be implemented within each cluster following a random sequence with a control period, a 4-month transition period and a post-educational intervention period. Eligibility criteria: for clusters: 6 NICUs from Ile-de-France and 6 NICUs from different regions in France; for patients: in-hospital during the study period (November 23, 2015 and November 2, 2017 [inclusion start dates varying by unit]) in one of the 12 NICUs; corrected gestational age ≤42 weeks upon admission; hospitalization period >2 days; and parents informed and not opposed to the use of their newborn's data. A routine occurrence reporting of medical errors and their consequence will take place during the entire study period. The intervention will combine an education to implement a standardized root cause analysis method, creation of bundles (insertion, daily goals, maintenance bundles) to prevent catheter-associated blood-stream infection and a poster to prevent extravasation injuries.

OUTCOME

We hypothesize a reduction from 60 (control) to 50 (intervention) AE/1000 patient-days. The primary outcome will be the rate of AE/1000 patient-days in the NICU.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02598609, trial registered November 6, 2015. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02598609.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Study approved by the regional ethic committee CPP Ile-de-France III (no 2014-A01751-46). The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals.

The Potential of Twitter as a Data Source for Patient Safety

BACKGROUND

Error-reporting systems are widely regarded as critical components to improving patient safety, yet current systems do not effectively engage patients. We sought to assess Twitter as a source to gather patient perspective on errors in this feasibility study.

METHODS

We included publicly accessible tweets in English from any geography. To collect patient safety tweets, we consulted a patient safety expert and constructed a set of highly relevant phrases, such as "doctor screwed up." We used Twitter's search application program interface from January to August 2012 to identify tweets that matched the set of phrases. Two researchers used criteria to independently review tweets and choose those relevant to patient safety; a third reviewer resolved discrepancies. Variables included source and sex of tweeter, source and type of error, emotional response, and mention of litigation.

RESULTS

Of 1006 tweets analyzed, 839 (83%) identified the type of error: 26% of which were procedural errors, 23% were medication errors, 23% were diagnostic errors, and 14% were surgical errors. A total of 850 (84%) identified a tweet source, 90% of which were by the patient and 9% by a family member. A total of 519 (52%) identified an emotional response, 47% of which expressed anger or frustration, 21% expressed humor or sarcasm, and 14% expressed sadness or grief. Of the tweets, 6.3% mentioned an intent to pursue malpractice litigation.

CONCLUSIONS

Twitter is a relevant data source to obtain the patient perspective on medical errors. Twitter may provide an opportunity for health systems and providers to identify and communicate with patients who have experienced a medical error. Further research is needed to assess the reliability of the data.

Standardising the Classification of Harm Associated with Medication Errors: The Harm Associated with Medication Error Classification (HAMEC)

Classifying harm associated with a medication error can be time consuming and labour intensive and limited studies undertake this step. There is no standardised process, and few studies that report harm assessment provide adequate methods to allow for study replication. Studies typically mention that a clinical review panel classified patient harm and provide a reference to a classification tool. Moreover, in many studies it is unclear whether potential or actual harm was classified as studies refer only to ‘error severity’. The tools used to categorise the severity of patient harm vary widely across studies and few have been assessed for inter-rater reliability and criterion validity. In this paper, we describe the systematic process we undertook to synthesise the defining elements and strengths, while mitigating the limitations, of existing harm classification tools to derive the Harm Associated with Medication Error Classification (HAMEC). This new tool provides a harm classification for use across clinical and research settings. The provision of an explicit process for its application and guiding category descriptors are designed to reduce the risk of misclassification and produce results that are comparable across studies. As the World Health Organisation embarks on its international safety challenge of reducing medication-related harm by 50%, accompanying methodological advances are required to measure progress.

Preventable Adverse Drug Events Among Inpatients: A Systematic Review

: media-1vid110.1542/5799876436001PEDS-VA_2018-0805Video Abstract CONTEXT: Patient harm resulting from medication errors drives prevention efforts, yet harm associated with medication errors in children has not been systematically reviewed.

OBJECTIVE

To review the incidence and severity of preventable adverse drug events (pADEs) resulting from medication errors in pediatric inpatient settings.

DATA SOURCES

Data sources included Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Medline, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and Embase.

STUDY SELECTION

Selected studies were published between January 2000 and December 2017, written in the English language, and measured pADEs among pediatric hospital inpatients by chart review or direct observation.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data extracted were medication error and harm definitions, pADE incidence and severity rates, items required for quality assessment, and sample details.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies were included. For children in general pediatric wards, incidence was at 0 to 17 pADEs per 1000 patient days or 1.3% of medication errors (of any type) compared with 0 to 29 pADEs per 1000 patient days or 1.5% of medication errors in ICUs. Hospital-wide studies contained reports of up to 74 pADEs per 1000 patient days or 2.6% of medication errors. The severity of pADEs was mainly minor.

LIMITATIONS

Limited literature on the severity of pADEs is available. Additional study will better illuminate differences among hospital wards and among those with or without health information technology.

CONCLUSIONS

Medication errors in pediatric settings seldom result in patient harm, and if they do, harm is predominantly of minor severity. Implementing health information technologies was associated with reduced incidence of harm.

Direct Observation of Medication Errors in Critical Care Setting: A Systematic Review

Medication errors continue to be an issue for the critically ill and are costly to both patients and health care facilities. This article reviews published research about these errors and reports results of observational studies. The types of errors, incidence, and root causes have been considered along with adverse consequences. The implications for bedside practice as a result of this review are fairly straightforward. Medication errors are happening at an alarming rate in the critical care environment, and these errors are preventable. It is imperative that all personnel respect and follow established guidelines and procedural safeguards to ensure flawless drug delivery to patients.

Intravenous medicine preparation technique training programme for nurses in clinical areas

Objective

The key objective of this study was to highlight the weak points in the medicine use process.

Method

We collected 15 videos from eight neonatal intensive care units where staff nurses showed how medicine preparation was performed. Recorded medicines were: vancomycin (6), gentamicin (5), caffeine citrate (2) and phenobarbital (2).

Results

We did not review any video without errors. In 8/15 (53.3%) videos, the same syringe was used to measure the medicine and the diluent. In 8/15 (53.3%) videos, the syringes used were not the correct size for the volume being measured. In 4/15 (26.6%) videos, the volume measured into the syringes was not checked after it was measured from vials or ampoules. In just one vancomycin preparation could the reconstitution process be described as a correct process; in the other five videos, mixing after diluent addition to the vancomycin vial was almost non-existent (less than 10 s). Mixing after the medicine and diluent were in the same syringe was also non-existent in all of the videos.

Conclusions

Hospitals should provide training programmes outlining the correct preparation technique.

Safety Culture in Neonatal Intensive Care Units in the Gaza Strip, Palestine: A Need for Policy Change

INTRODUCTION

Assessment of the prevailing safety culture within the Gazan health care system can be used to identify problem areas. Specifically, the need for improvements, raising awareness about patient safety, the identification and evaluation of existing safety programs and interventions for improving the safety culture. This study aims to assess the safety culture in the neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in Gaza Strip hospitals and to assess the safety culture in regards to caregivers' characteristics.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional study using a census sample, we surveyed all nurses and physicians working in at all the NICUs in the Gaza Strip, Palestine. The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) which includes six scales was used to assess participants' attitudes towards safety culture.

RESULTS

The overall score for SAQ was 63.9. Domains' scores ranged between 55.5 (perception of management) and 71.8 (stress recognition). The scores reported by our participants fell below the 75 out of a possible score of 100, which was considered as a cut-off point for a positive score. Moreover, our results revealed substantial variation in safety culture domain scores among participating NICUs.

CONCLUSION

These results should be an indicator to our health care policy makers to modify current or adopt new health care policies to improve safety culture. It should also be a call to design customized programs for improving the safety culture in NICUs in the Gaza Strip.

Interventions to Improve Patient Safety During Intubation in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

OBJECTIVE

To improve patient safety in our NICU by decreasing the incidence of intubation-associated adverse events (AEs).

METHODS

We sequentially implemented and tested 3 interventions: standardized checklist for intubation, premedication algorithm, and computerized provider order entry set for intubation. We compared baseline data collected over 10 months (period 1) with data collected over a 10-month intervention and sustainment period (period 2). Outcomes were the percentage of intubations containing any prospectively defined AE and intubations with bradycardia or hypoxemia. We followed process measures for each intervention. We used risk ratios (RRs) and statistical process control methods in a times series design to assess differences between the 2 periods.

RESULTS

AEs occurred in 126/273 (46%) intubations during period 1 and 85/236 (36%) intubations during period 2 (RR = 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-0.97). Significantly fewer intubations with bradycardia (24.2% vs 9.3%, RR = 0.39; 95% CI, 0.25-0.61) and hypoxemia (44.3% vs 33.1%, RR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.6-0.93) occurred during period 2. Using statistical process control methods, we identified 2 cases of special cause variation with a sustained decrease in AEs and bradycardia after implementation of our checklist. All process measures increased reflecting sustained improvement throughout data collection.

CONCLUSIONS

Our interventions resulted in a 10% absolute reduction in AEs that was sustained. Implementation of a standardized checklist for intubation made the greatest impact, with reductions in both AEs and bradycardia.

Assessing safety culture in NICU: psychometric properties of the Italian version of Safety Attitude Questionnaire and result implications

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVE

Neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) are a high-risk setting. The Safety Attitude Questionnaire (SAQ) is a widely used tool to measure safety culture. The aims of the study are to verify the psychometric properties of the Italian version of SAQ, to evaluate safety culture in the NICUs and to identify improvement interventions.

METHOD

A cross-sectional study was conducted in 6 level III NICUs. The SAQ was translated into Italian and adapted to the context, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to validate the questionnaire.

RESULTS

193 questionnaires were collected. The mean response rate was 59.7% (range 44.5%-95.7%). The answers were analysed according to six factors: f1 - teamwork climate, f2 - safety climate, f3 - job satisfaction, f4 - stress recognition, f5 - perception of management, f6 - working conditions. The CFA indexes were adequate (McDonald's omega indexes varied from 0.74 to 0.94, the SRMR index was equal to 0.79 and the RMSEA index was 0.070, 95% CI = 0.063-0.078). The mean composite score was 57.6 (SD 17.9), ranging between 42.3 and 69.7 on a standardized 100-point scale. We highlighted significant differences among units and professions (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The Italian version of the SAQ proved to be an effective tool to evaluate and compare the safety culture in the NICUs. The obtained scores significantly varied both within and among the NICUs. The organizational and structural characteristics of the involved hospitals probably affect the safety culture perception by the staff.

Medicine preparation errors in ten Spanish neonatal intensive care units

This study assessed the rate of errors in intravenous medicine preparation at the bedside in neonatal intensive care units vs the preparation error rate in a hospital pharmacy service. We conducted a prospective observational study between June and September 2013. Ten Spanish neonatal intensive care units and one hospital pharmacy service participated in the study. Two types of preparation errors were considered: calculation errors and accuracy errors. A total of 522 samples were collected: 238 of vancomycin, 139 of gentamicin, 39 of phenobarbital and 88 of caffeine citrate preparations. Of these, 444 samples were collected by nurses in neonatal intensive care units, and 60 were provided by the hospital pharmacy service. Overall, 18 samples were excluded from the analysis. We detected calculation errors in 6/444 (1.35%) and accuracy errors in 243/444 (54.7%) samples from the neonatal intensive care units. In contrast, in samples from the hospital pharmacy service, no calculation errors were detected, but there were accuracy errors in 23/60 (38.3%) samples.

CONCLUSION

While calculation errors can be eliminated using protocols based on standard drug concentrations, accuracy error rates depend on several variables that affect both neonatal intensive care units and hospital pharmacy services.

WHAT IS KNOWN

Medication use is associated with a risk of errors and adverse events. Medication errors are more frequent and have more severe consequences in paediatric patients. Lack of knowledge of drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in relation to physiological immaturity makes neonates more vulnerable to medication errors.

WHAT IS NEW

Calculation errors are avoided using concentration standard preparation protocols. Accuracy in the preparation process depends mainly on the degree to which commercial drug preparations meet current legal requirements and the syringes and preparation techniques used.

Endotracheal Intubation in Neonates: A Prospective Study of Adverse Safety Events in 162 Infants

OBJECTIVE

To determine the rate of adverse events associated with endotracheal intubation in newborns and modifiable factors contributing to these events.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a prospective, observational study in a 100-bed, academic, level IV neonatal intensive care unit from September 2013 through June 2014. We collected data on intubations using standardized data collection instruments with validation by medical record review. Intubations in the delivery or operating rooms were excluded. The primary outcome was an intubation with any adverse event. Adverse events were defined and tracked prospectively as nonsevere or severe. We measured clinical variables including number of attempts to successful intubation and intubation urgency (elective, urgent, or emergent). We used logistic regression models to estimate the association of these variables with adverse events.

RESULTS

During the study period, 304 intubations occurred in 178 infants. Data were available for 273 intubations (90%) in 162 patients. Adverse events occurred in 107 (39%) intubations with nonsevere and severe events in 96 (35%) and 24 (8.8%) intubations, respectively. Increasing number of intubation attempts (OR 2.1, 95% CI, 1.6-2.6) and emergent intubations (OR 4.7, 95% CI, 1.7-13) were predictors of adverse events. The primary cause of emergent intubations was unplanned extubation (62%).

CONCLUSIONS

Adverse events are common in the neonatal intensive care unit, occurring in 4 of 10 intubations. The odds of an adverse event doubled with increasing number of attempts and quadrupled in the emergent setting. Quality improvement efforts to address these factors are needed to improve patient safety.

[Medication errors in a neonatal unit: One of the main adverse events]

INTRODUCTION

Neonatal units are one of the hospital areas most exposed to the committing of treatment errors. A medication error (ME) is defined as the avoidable incident secondary to drug misuse that causes or may cause harm to the patient. The aim of this paper is to present the incidence of ME (including feeding) reported in our neonatal unit and its characteristics and possible causal factors. A list of the strategies implemented for prevention is presented.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An analysis was performed on the ME declared in a neonatal unit.

RESULTS

A total of 511 MEs have been reported over a period of seven years in the neonatal unit. The incidence in the critical care unit was 32.2 per 1000 hospital days or 20 per 100 patients, of which 0.22 per 1000 days had serious repercussions. The ME reported were, 39.5% prescribing errors, 68.1% administration errors, 0.6% were adverse drug reactions. Around two-thirds (65.4%) were produced by drugs, with 17% being intercepted. The large majority (89.4%) had no impact on the patient, but 0.6% caused permanent damage or death. Nurses reported 65.4% of MEs. The most commonly implicated causal factor was distraction (59%). Simple corrective action (alerts), and intermediate (protocols, clinical sessions and courses) and complex actions (causal analysis, monograph) were performed.

CONCLUSIONS

It is essential to determine the current state of ME, in order to establish preventive measures and, together with teamwork and good practices, promote a climate of safety.

Auditing of Monitoring and Respiratory Support Equipment in a Level III-C Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

BACKGROUND

Random safety audits (RSAs) are a safety tool but have not been widely used in hospitals.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the frequency of proper use of equipment safety mechanisms in relation to monitoring and mechanical ventilation by performing RSAs. The study also determined whether factors related to the patient, time period, or characteristics of the area of admission influenced how the device safety systems were used.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was conducted in a level III-C Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) during 2012. 87 days were randomly selected. Appropriate overall use was defined when all evaluated variables were correctly programmed in the audited device.

RESULTS

A total of 383 monitor and ventilator audits were performed. The Kappa coefficient of interobserver agreement was 0.93. The rate of appropriate overall use of the monitors and respiratory support equipment was 33.68%. Significant differences were found with improved usage during weekends, OR 1.85 (1.12-3.06, p = 0.01), and during the late shift (3 pm to 10 pm), OR 1.59 (1.03-2.4, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Equipment safety systems of monitors and ventilators are not properly used. To improve patient safety, we should identify which alarms are really needed and where the difficulties lie for the correct alarm programming.

Prospective, controlled study of an intervention to reduce errors in neonatal antibiotic orders

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of an interactive computerized order set with decision support (ICOS-DS) in preventing medication errors in neonatal late-onset sepsis (LOS).

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, controlled comparison of error rates in antibiotic orders for neonates admitted to the Medical University of South Carolina neonatal intensive care unit with suspected LOS (after postnatal day of life 3) prior to (n=153) and after (n=146) implementation of the ICOS-DS. Antibiotic orders were independently evaluated by two pharmacists for prescribing errors, potential errors and omissions. Prescribing errors included>10% overdoses or underdoses, inappropriate route, schedule or antibiotic, drug-drug or drug-disease interactions, and incorrect patient demographics. Potential errors included misspelled drugs, leading decimals, trailing zeroes, impractical doses and error-prone abbreviations. Multiple errors and omissions in an order were counted individually.

RESULTS

Overall error rate per order decreased from 1.7 to 0.8 (P<0.001) and potential error rate from 1.0 to 0.06 (P<0.001). The reduction in omission error rate per order from 0.2 to 0.1 was not significant (P=0.17). The prescribing error rate per order increased from 0.4 to 0.7 (P=0.03) because of the use of incorrect patient weights (P<0.001). Renal dysfunction was significantly associated with an increased risk of prescribing errors (odds ratio=3.7, P=0.01) which was not significantly different for handwritten versus ICOS-DS orders (P=0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

The ICOS-DS significantly improved the quality of neonatal LOS antibiotic orders although the use of incorrect patient weights was increased. In both groups, orders for patients with renal dysfunction were at risk for prescribing errors. Further evaluation of interventions to promote medication safety for this population is needed.

Development of a consensus-base list of criteria for prescribing medication in a pediatric population

BACKGROUND

Although many people are involved in the optimal use of a medication within this process, the use of medications carries risks of adverse events, which are greater in the pediatric population because of many factors.

OBJECTIVE

In this context, our aim was to develop a consensus-based list of criteria for the safety of the pediatric medication-use process or circuit (referred to from now on as the CIRCUS tool: CIRcuit-of-Child-drug-USe).

SETTING

Multicenter with a trio of experts from eight university hospitals.

METHODS

A literature search (1998-2013) was conducted in order to identify the different safety practice domains for the pediatric medication use process. Twenty-six safety practice domains were identified and 48 compliance criteria were formulated. In order to reach a consensus on the most relevant compliance criteria for safety practices, an international 24 French-speaking multidisciplinary panelists (8 doctors, 8 pharmacists and 8 nurses) selected to represent a broad range of experience levels and specialties took part in a two round Delphi survey which was conducted between March and July 2013. Each panelist was asked to rate each proposed criterion on a 1-9 Likert scale in order to show their level of agreement (i.e. 1 reflects strong disagreement and 9 reflects strong agreement).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Development of a consensus-base list for safety practices in pediatrics.

RESULTS

Twenty-two of the 24 professionals invited to take part in this survey (92% participation rate) completed the two Delphi rounds. At the end of the two Delphi rounds, a total of 38/48 (79%) safety practice compliance criteria achieved consensus by the panelists. The criteria were grouped into 23 domains.

CONCLUSION

This study presents the development of a self-assessment tool for safety practices in the pediatric drug-use process using a Delphi method. This tool may be used in order to record and compare the prevalence of best safety practices in the pediatric drug-use process.

Evaluation of the patient safety culture in neonatal intensive care

This quantitative, survey type study aimed to analyze the patient safety culture of the nursing and medical teams of public hospitals of Florianopolis. A total of 141 professionals participated, with data collected between February/April 2013, after approval by the Ethics Committee. The Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture was used and the 12 dimensions of the culture were evaluated. Descriptive analysis was performed, classifying the dimensions into areas of strength or critical areas. Despite not verifying a specific area of strength, the dimensions with the best evaluation were Supervisor/manager expectations and actions promoting safety and Organizational learning - continuous improvement. The dimensions with the highest percentage of negative responses, identified as critical were: Non-punitive response to errors and Management support for safety. The safety culture in the Neonatal Intensive Care Units presented aspects that could potentially become areas of strength. Cultural changes are necessary, especially in addressing errors.

Factors contributing to endobronchial intubation in neonates

OBJECTIVES

To assess neonatologists' practices, knowledge, and opinions regarding the prevention of endobronchial intubation.

DESIGN

Anonymous survey.

SUBJECTS AND SETTING

Program Directors of Neonatology Fellowship Programs in the United States, surveyed by mail, and neonatologists who volunteered to respond while attending the Vermont-Oxford Network Annual Meeting.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Program directors (response rate 66%) and other practitioners contributed equally to the 132 survey responses, which were statistically indistinguishable between groups. Deep intubation frequency was estimated at greater than 5% by 39% of respondents, and 38% believed that it contributes to neonatal morbidity equally or more than medication errors. Quality assurance surveillance of intubations was uncommon. Neonatologists had remarkably varied responses when identifying the recommended vocal cord-level marking from a triple set of distal safety markings on a commonly used endotracheal tube; most had never seen recommendations or package insert directions for the use of such markings, and 86% desired improvements in endotracheal tube features to promote safer intubations.

CONCLUSIONS

Neonatologists perceive endobronchial intubation as a consequential but underreported complication. Most are uncertain about the use of common vocal cord markings on endotracheal tubes, and few have seen specific instructions on this feature. We suggest that standardizing endotracheal tube safety features and making clear directions available to users may decrease the risk of endobronchial intubation in neonates.

Use of the Delphi technique to determine safety features to be included in a neonatal and paediatric prescription chart

BACKGROUND

Neonatal and paediatric patients are especially vulnerable to serious injury as a result of medication errors due to their small size, physiological immaturity and limited compensatory abilities. The prescription chart remains an essential form of communication of prescribing decisions and instructions. Modifications to the safety features of prescription charts have been shown to reduce the frequency of medication errors.

OBJECTIVE

To determine, using the Delphi technique, which safety features should be included in the inpatient neonatal and paediatric prescription chart to help minimise the risk of medication errors associated with the use of the chart.

SETTING

Acute general hospital in Malta.

METHOD

A two-round modified e-Delphi process was conducted. The Delphi questionnaire was developed from a mapping process, a literature search and references supporting the literature review. It comprised 155 safety features for consensus. The Delphi panel consisted of nine doctors, five nurses and four pharmacists. Participants were asked to rate their agreement to the inclusion of these features in the local chart using a three-point Likert scale, and to add further comments as necessary at the end of each section. In the second round, participants were given the opportunity to change their individual response in view of the groups' response.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

This was set at a 70% level of agreement.

RESULTS

Results from each round were analysed to provide the percentage frequencies and number of participants who chose each point from the Likert scale provided, and the response count for each safety feature. A ≥70% consensus level was achieved on: 115 safety features in Round 1 (total: 155 safety features) and 23 safety features in Round 2 (total: 40 safety features) while only 17 safety features did not achieve consensus at the end of the process.

CONCLUSION

Consensus was achieved on 133 safety features to be included in the neonatal and paediatric prescription chart. Five safety features achieved consensus disagreement for their inclusion in the chart. Identifying the appropriate safety features forms part of an essential strategy to reduce the incidence of medication errors associated with the use of the chart in these patients.

Preventing medication errors in neonatology: Is it a dream?

Since 1999, the problem of patient safety has drawn particular attention, becoming a priority in health care. A “medication error” (ME) is any preventable event occurring at any phase of the pharmacotherapy process (ordering, transcribing, dispensing, administering, and monitoring) that leads to, or can lead to, harm to the patient. Hence, MEs can involve every professional of the clinical team. MEs range from those with severe consequences to those with little or no impact on the patient. Although a high ME rate has been found in neonatal wards, newborn safety issues have not been adequately studied until now. Healthcare professionals working in neonatal wards are particularly susceptible to committing MEs due to the peculiarities of newborn patients and of the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) environment. Current neonatal prevention strategies for MEs have been borrowed from adult wards, but many factors such as high costs and organizational barriers have hindered their diffusion. In general, two types of strategies have been proposed: the first strategy consists of identifying human factors that result in errors and redesigning the work in the NICU in order to minimize them; the second one suggests to design and implement effective systems for preventing errors or intercepting them before reaching the patient. In the future, prevention strategies for MEs need to be improved and tailored to the special neonatal population and the NICU environment and, at the same time, every effort will have to be made to support their clinical application.

Interventions to reduce medication errors in pediatric intensive care

OBJECTIVE

To systematically examine the research literature to identify which interventions reduce medication errors in pediatric intensive care units.

DATA SOURCES

Databases were searched from inception to April 2014.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Studies were included if they involved the conduct of an intervention with the intent of reducing medication errors.

DATA SYNTHESIS

In all, 34 relevant articles were identified. Apart from 1 study, all involved single-arm, before-and-after designs without a comparative, concurrent control group. A total of 6 types of interventions were utilized: computerized physician order entry (CPOE), intravenous systems (ISs), modes of education (MEs), protocols and guidelines (PGs), pharmacist involvement (PI), and support systems for clinical decision making (SSCDs). Statistically significant reductions in medication errors were achieved in 7/8 studies for CPOE, 2/5 studies for ISs, 9/11 studies for MEs, 1/2 studies for PGs, 2/3 studies for PI, and 3/5 studies for SSCDs. The test for subgroup differences showed that there was no statistically significant difference among the 6 subgroups of interventions, χ(2)(5) = 1.88, P = 0.87. The following risk ratio results for meta-analysis were obtained: CPOE: 0.47 (95% CI = 0.28, 0.79); IS: 0.37 (95% CI = 0.19, 0.73); ME: 0.36 (95% CI = 0.22, 0.58); PG: 0.82 (95% CI = 0.21, 3.25); PI: 0.39 (95% CI = 0.10, 1.51), and SSCD: 0.49 (95% CI = 0.23, 1.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Available evidence suggests some aspects of CPOE with decision support, ME, and IS may help in reducing medication errors. Good quality, prospective, observational studies are needed for institutions to determine the most effective interventions.

Transcultural mapping and usability testing of the clinical care classification system for an Iranian neonatal ICU population

The aim of this research study was to map nursing diagnoses and interventions documented and observed in a neonatal ICU to the Clinical Care Classification system and to validate the translation of these mapped diagnoses and interventions into Persian. This descriptive research used directed content analysis to map diagnoses and interventions to the Clinical Care Classification. Documentation reports of nursing care were extracted from a paper-based documentation system for infants hospitalized in April, May, and June 2011. Observations of care were conducted and compared with documentation to itemize any interventions not included in the documented record. Documented reports of nurses' care and recorded observations were analyzed through directed content analysis, and obtained expressions were mapped to the diagnoses and intervention coding system of the Clinical Care Classification and translated into Persian. Validation of the subsequent code translation was obtained from nursing experts using the Delphi method in two rounds. Findings showed the most frequent nursing diagnoses were related to respiratory condition of infants such as mechanical ventilation dependency (21.1%), and the most frequent nursing interventions were related to completing physician orders such as blood sampling and medication administration (23.9%). Only 47.8% of Clinical Care Classification diagnoses and interventions codes were reflected in the data set. The relatively low rate of nursing care documented in therecords could be due to both the lack of a nursingcare delivery framework, such as the nursing process, and the lack of any framework or standardization in the documentation system in this setting. Using a framework for care delivery and a coding system for documentation of care such as the ClinicalCare Classification would allow for the more complete documentation of nursing care and subsequently the ability to track and analyze this care.

Phenotyping for patient safety: algorithm development for electronic health record based automated adverse event and medical error detection in neonatal intensive care

Background

Although electronic health records (EHRs) have the potential to provide a foundation for quality and safety algorithms, few studies have measured their impact on automated adverse event (AE) and medical error (ME) detection within the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) environment.

Objective

This paper presents two phenotyping AE and ME detection algorithms (ie, IV infiltrations, narcotic medication oversedation and dosing errors) and describes manual annotation of airway management and medication/fluid AEs from NICU EHRs.

Methods

From 753 NICU patient EHRs from 2011, we developed two automatic AE/ME detection algorithms, and manually annotated 11 classes of AEs in 3263 clinical notes. Performance of the automatic AE/ME detection algorithms was compared to trigger tool and voluntary incident reporting results. AEs in clinical notes were double annotated and consensus achieved under neonatologist supervision. Sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), and specificity are reported.

Results

Twelve severe IV infiltrates were detected. The algorithm identified one more infiltrate than the trigger tool and eight more than incident reporting. One narcotic oversedation was detected demonstrating 100% agreement with the trigger tool. Additionally, 17 narcotic medication MEs were detected, an increase of 16 cases over voluntary incident reporting.

Conclusions

Automated AE/ME detection algorithms provide higher sensitivity and PPV than currently used trigger tools or voluntary incident-reporting systems, including identification of potential dosing and frequency errors that current methods are unequipped to detect.

Measuring safety culture in Palestinian neonatal intensive care units using the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire

PURPOSE

This study aimed to measure safety culture, examine variations among neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), and assess the associations with caregiver characteristics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional design was used, utilizing the Arabic version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire, administered to all 305 nurses and physicians working in the 16 NICUs in the West Bank.

RESULTS

There were 204 participants, comprising of mainly nurses (80.4%), women (63%), 30 years or younger (62.6%), holding a bachelor's degree or more (66.7%), and with at least 5 years of experience in the profession (60.3%). Safety Attitudes Questionnaire mean domain scores ranged from 71.22 for job satisfaction to 63 for stress recognition on a 100-point scale; the scores varied significantly among NICUs (P<.05). About 85% of the participants rated the safety grade either excellent or very good; 71.0% did not report any event in the past year.

CONCLUSIONS

We found large variations in safety culture within and between a comprehensive sample of Palestinian NICUs. The findings suggest the need for a customized approach that builds on existing strengths and targets areas of opportunities for improvement to optimize health care delivery to the most vulnerable of patients, sick newborns in the NICU setting.

Factors associated with iatrogenesis in neonatal intensive care units: an observational multicenter study

The objective of our study was to assess factors associated with iatrogenic events in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs). This was a retrospective analysis based on a cohort of patients who participated in our previous prospective study (Pediatrics 122:550-555, 2008), conducted in four tertiary university-affiliated NICUs in Israel, that included all consecutive infants (n = 615) hospitalized during the study period. Ongoing monitoring of iatrogenic events was performed by designated "iatrogenesis advocates." The main outcome measures were the association of individual infant characteristics and NICUs' environmental characteristics with iatrogenic events assessed by univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis. We found that four infant characteristics were significantly (p < 0.001) associated with iatrogenic events in a univariate analysis: gestational age, birth weight, severity of initial illness as assessed by the Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology and Perinatal Extension (SNAPPE II), and length of stay (LOS). All four factors demonstrated a significant (p < 0.001) dose-response relationship with iatrogenic events. Univariate analysis for environmental characteristics showed that type of shift, but not nursing workload, was significantly associated with iatrogenic events (p < 0.001). In a multiple logistic regression analysis, only LOS (adjusted OR 1.02 [95 % CI, 1.01-1.03]) and type of shift, morning vs. evening (adjusted OR 3.44 [95 % CI, 2.33-5.08]) and morning vs. night (adjusted OR 6.07 [95 % CI, 3.86-9.56]), remained independently associated with iatrogenic events (p < 0.001). Prolonged LOS and morning shifts were found to be significantly associated with iatrogenic events. Further prospective research is warranted to identify the specific causes for iatrogenic events in order to target active interventions to prevent them.

Using smart pumps to reduce medication errors in the NICU

Infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) are considered one of the most vulnerable patient populations, and medication errors in this population can result in devastating, life-threatening consequences. The use of "smart pump" technology has the potential to minimize risk of error by providing safety measures before medication administration. Successful integration of smart pumps requires a clear communication plan to facilitate staff education and acceptance of advanced technology systems. Unit adoption of smart pumps can enhance patient safety while supporting the implementation of evidenced-based practices in nursing care.

Evaluation of drug administration errors in a teaching hospital

Background

Medication errors can occur at any of the three steps of the medication use process: prescribing, dispensing and administration. We aimed to determine the incidence, type and clinical importance of drug administration errors and to identify risk factors.

Methods

Prospective study based on disguised observation technique in four wards in a teaching hospital in Paris, France (800 beds). A pharmacist accompanied nurses and witnessed the preparation and administration of drugs to all patients during the three drug rounds on each of six days per ward. Main outcomes were number, type and clinical importance of errors and associated risk factors. Drug administration error rate was calculated with and without wrong time errors. Relationship between the occurrence of errors and potential risk factors were investigated using logistic regression models with random effects.

Results

Twenty-eight nurses caring for 108 patients were observed. Among 1501 opportunities for error, 415 administrations (430 errors) with one or more errors were detected (27.6%). There were 312 wrong time errors, ten simultaneously with another type of error, resulting in an error rate without wrong time error of 7.5% (113/1501). The most frequently administered drugs were the cardiovascular drugs (425/1501, 28.3%). The highest risks of error in a drug administration were for dermatological drugs. No potentially life-threatening errors were witnessed and 6% of errors were classified as having a serious or significant impact on patients (mainly omission). In multivariate analysis, the occurrence of errors was associated with drug administration route, drug classification (ATC) and the number of patient under the nurse's care.

Conclusion

Medication administration errors are frequent. The identification of its determinants helps to undertake designed interventions.

Patient safety in the NICU: a comprehensive review

Patient safety is a worldwide priority aimed at preventing medical errors before they cause death, harm, or injury. Medical errors impact 1 in 10 patients worldwide (WHO), and their implications may include death, permanent, or temporary harm, financial loss, and psychosocial harm to the patient and in some cases to the caregiver. The unique aspects and the complexity of the neonatal intensive (NICU) environment, in addition to the vulnerability of the neonatal population increase the risk for medical errors. The following article offers an overview of safety issues specific to neonatal intensive care and provides strategies and examples on how to ensure safe practice. In particular, the authors focus on strategies to improve the team process. Practice recommendations and research implications are presented.

Concomitant prescribing and dispensing errors at a Brazilian hospital: a descriptive study

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the prevalence and types of prescribing and dispensing errors occurring with high-alert medications and to propose preventive measures to avoid errors with these medications.

INTRODUCTION

The prevalence of adverse events in health care has increased, and medication errors are probably the most common cause of these events. Pediatric patients are known to be a high-risk group and are an important target in medication error prevention.

METHODS

Observers collected data on prescribing and dispensing errors occurring with high-alert medications for pediatric inpatients in a university hospital. In addition to classifying the types of error that occurred, we identified cases of concomitant prescribing and dispensing errors.

RESULTS

One or more prescribing errors, totaling 1,632 errors, were found in 632 (89.6%) of the 705 high-alert medications that were prescribed and dispensed. We also identified at least one dispensing error in each high-alert medication dispensed, totaling 1,707 errors. Among these dispensing errors, 723 (42.4%) content errors occurred concomitantly with the prescribing errors. A subset of dispensing errors may have occurred because of poor prescription quality. The observed concomitancy should be examined carefully because improvements in the prescribing process could potentially prevent these problems.

CONCLUSION

The system of drug prescribing and dispensing at the hospital investigated in this study should be improved by incorporating the best practices of medication safety and preventing medication errors. High-alert medications may be used as triggers for improving the safety of the drug-utilization system.

Iatrogenic events in neonates: beneficial effects of prevention strategies and continuous monitoring

OBJECTIVES

To assess the impact of continuous incident reporting and subsequent prevention strategies on the incidence of severe iatrogenic events and targeted priorities in admitted neonates.

METHODS

We performed preintervention (January 1 to September 1, 2005) and postintervention (January 1, 2008, to January 1, 2009) prospective investigations based on continuous incident reporting. Patient-safety initiatives were implemented for a period of 2 years. The main outcome was a reduction in the incidence of severe iatrogenic events. Secondary outcomes were improvements in 5 targeted priorities: catheter-related infections; invasive procedures; unplanned extubations; 10-fold drug infusion-rate errors; and severe cutaneous injuries.

RESULTS

The first and second study periods included totals of 388 and 645 patients (median gestational ages: 34 and 35 weeks, respectively; P = .015). In the second period the incidence of severe iatrogenic events was significantly reduced from 7.6 to 4.8 per 1000 patient-days (P = .005). Infections related to central catheters decreased significantly from 13.9 to 8.2 per 1000 catheter-days (P < .0001), as did exposure to central catheters, which decreased from 359 to 239 days per 1000 patient-days (P < .0001). Tenfold drug-dosing errors were reduced significantly (P = .022). However, the number of unplanned extubations increased significantly from 5.6 to 15.5 per 1000 ventilation-days (P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Prospective, continuous incident reporting followed by the implementation of prevention strategies are complementary procedures that constitute an effective system to improve the quality of care and patient safety.

Iatrogenic complications in the neonatal intensive care unit

With the introduction of novel technologies and approaches in neonatal care and the lack of appropriately designed and well-executed randomized clinical trials to investigate the impact of these interventions, iatrogenic complications have been increasingly seen in the neonatal intensive care unit. In addition, increased awareness and the introduction of more appropriate quality control measures have resulted in higher levels of suspicion about and increased recognition of complications associated with delivery of care. The incidence of complications also rises with the increased length of hospital stay and level of immaturity. Approximately half of the iatrogenic complications are related to medication errors. The other complications are due to nosocomial infections, insertion of invasive catheters, prolonged mechanical ventilation, administration of parenteral nutrition solution, skin damage and environmental complications. Adopting newer technologies and preventive measures might decrease these complications and improve outcomes. Quality improvement projects targeting areas for improvement are expected to build team spirit and further improve the outcomes. In addition, participation in national reporting systems will enhance education and provide an opportunity to compare outcomes with peer institutions.

Crossing the quality chasm in neonatal-perinatal medicine

The "Quality Chasm" exists in neonatal intensive care. Despite years of clinical research in neonatology, therapies continue to be underused, overused, or misused. A key concept in crossing the quality chasm is system redesign. The unpredictability of human factors and the dynamic complexity of the neonatal ICU are not amenable to rigid reductionist control and redesign. Change is best accomplished in this complex adaptive system by use of simple rules: (1) general direction pointing, (2) prohibitions, (3) resource or permission providing. These rules create conditions for purposeful self-organizing behavior, allowing widespread natural experimentation, all focused on generating the desired outcome.

Safety and Risk Management Interventions in Hospitals

The aim of this systematic review was (a) to synthesize the evidence on the effectiveness of detection, mitigation, and actions to reduce risks in hospitals and (b) to identify and describe components of interventions responsible for effectiveness. Thirteen literature databases were explored using a structured search and data extraction strategy. All included studies dealing with incident reporting described positive effects. Evidence regarding the effectiveness and efficiency of safety analysis is scarce. No studies on mitigation were included. The collected evidence on risk reduction concerns a variety of interventions to reduce medication errors, fall incidents, diagnostic errors, and adverse events in general. Most studies reported positive effects; however, interventions were often multifaceted, and it was difficult to disentangle their impact. This made it difficult to draw generic lessons from this body of research. More rigorous evaluations are needed, in particular, of continuous learning and safety analysis techniques.

Educational strategy to reduce medication errors in a neonatal intensive care unit

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the effect of a comprehensive preventive educational strategy on the number and type of drug errors in the prescription process in a regional neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

DESIGN

Medication errors during prescription were recorded in a 41 bed, level III regional neonatal unit by a pharmacist. Data were retrieved from handwritten doctor's orders and introduced at bedsite into an e-database. Each prescription, not related to enteral and parenteral nutrition and blood products, was evaluated for dosage, units, route and dosing interval. The study was developed in three phases: pilot phase to know the baseline drug error rate and estimate sample size; pre-intervention (4182 drug orders reviewed); and post-intervention seven months after a comprehensive preventive educational intervention consisting sessions about drug errors and study's aims was implemented.

RESULTS

After the preventive educational intervention was implemented, the prescription error rate and the percentage of registers with one or more incident decreased significantly from 20.7 to 3% (p < 0.001) and from 19.2 to 2.9% (p < 0.001), respectively. Simultaneously, an improvement in correct identification of the prescribing physician was registered (from 1.3 to 78.2%). The rest of items analysed were similar in both periods.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of a structured preventive educational intervention for health professionals in a regional NICU reduced the medication error rate, possibly by the dissemination of a patient safety culture.

Which aspects of safety culture predict incident reporting behavior in neonatal intensive care units? A multilevel analysis

OBJECTIVES

Safety culture assessments are increasingly used to evaluate patient-safety programs. However, it is not clear which aspects of safety culture are most relevant in understanding incident reporting behavior, and ultimately improving patient safety. The objective of this study was to examine which aspects of safety culture predict incident reporting behavior in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), before and after implementation of a voluntary, nonpunitive incident reporting system.

DESIGN

Survey study based on a translated, validated version of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture. This survey incorporates two outcome measures, 11 dimensions of patient-safety culture as well as demographic data.

SETTING

Eight tertiary care NICUs and one surgical pediatric ICU.

SUBJECTS

All unit personnel.

INTERVENTION

Implementation of a specialty-based, voluntary, nonpunitive incident reporting system.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The survey was conducted before (t = 0) and after (t = 1 yr) the intervention.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

number of self-reported incidents in the past 12 months. Overall response rate was 80% (n = 700) at t = 0 and 76% (n = 670) at t = 1 yr. Based on a multivariate multilevel regression prediction model, the number of self-reported incidents increased after the intervention and was positively associated with a nonpunitive response to error and negatively associated with overall perceptions of safety and hospital management support for patient safety.

CONCLUSIONS

A nonpunitive approach to error, hospital management support for patient safety, and overall perceptions of safety predict incident reporting behavior in the NICU. The relation between these aspects of safety culture and patient outcome requires further scrutiny and therefore remains an important issue to address in future research.

Pediatric medication safety: the power of the team

Children are at risk from adverse medication events. National attention has been focused on medication errors resulting from medication formulation issues to medication administration issues. There is a compelling need to improve strategies that will result in reduced risk as well as reduced harm to children from medication mishaps. Opportunity exists to enhance the efforts of national medication safety groups by identifying teams at every level of care that might best apply research findings to pediatric medication safety processes. This review describes the evidence basis of pediatric medication safety strategies and the national teams that substantially influence the application of these strategies at facility, unit, and community levels, and it asserts that medication safety strategies matter most at the level of the child.

Iatrogenic disorders in modern neonatology: a focus on safety and quality of care

The introduction of new modalities of treatment for the very premature infant and advanced life-support systems have led to a decrease in the neonatal mortality rate, and a consequent increase in the population of the tiniest survivors. Many premature infants that survive their neonatal intensive care unit stay have permanent injury to their vital organs including eyes, lungs, brain, and gastrointestinal tract, causing them to have lifelong disabilities. Whether these injuries are a result of their prematurity, or are caused by the life-support systems and treatments is a subject of much dispute. This article explains the process of iatrogenicity and separates the iatrogenic problems that are preventable from those that are currently unpreventable.