Systemic antifungal prophylaxis for very low birthweight infants: a systematic review

Fluconazole prophylaxis in preterm infants: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

This article aims to review the use of antifungal prophylaxis with intravenous fluconazole in premature newborns and the occurrence of Invasive Candidiasis.

METHODS

This is a systematic review with search at databases: PubMed, Capes Portal, Virtual Health Library (BVS - Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde)/Lilacs, Scopus and Cochrane. The keywords used were: "Antifungal", "Candida" "Fluconazole prophylaxis" and "Preterm infants".

RESULTS

Invasive Candidiasis was evaluated in all the twelve items. In eleven of them, there was a statistically significant difference between the groups receiving prophylactic fluconazole, with lower frequency of Invasive Candidiasis, compared to placebo or no prophylaxis group. Colonization by Candida species was also evaluated in five studies; four of them presented statistically lower proportion of colonization in patients with Fluconazole prophylaxis, compared to placebo or no drugs. In one study, there was a significant difference, favoring the use of fluconazole, and reduction of death.

CONCLUSION

Studies indicate the effectiveness of prophylaxis with fluconazole, with reduction in the incidence of colonization and invasive fungal disease. The benefits of prophylaxis should be evaluated considering the incidence of candidiasis in the unit, the mortality associated with candidiasis, the safety and toxicity of short and long-term medication, and the potential for development of resistant pathogens.

Integrated measures for prevention of invasive Candida infections in preterm infants in a Chinese neonatal intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

The increasing incidence of invasive Candida infections (ICIs) in preterm infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of Xinhua Hospital aroused our concern. We undertook a retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy of different preventive measures for ICI in preterm infants.

METHODS

Preterm infants with gestational age (GA) <33 weeks admitted between 2010 and 2013 were divided into 3 groups according to the preventive measures applied in different periods: the control group (CG), fluconazole group (FG), and integrated measures group (IMG). We analyzed the incidence of ICI and distribution of fungal pathogens in these 3 groups, and also evaluated the efficiency of various measures in preventing ICIs in preterm infants.

RESULTS

The study sample comprised 261 preterm infants born at <33 weeks GA, including 94 in the CG, 99 in the FG, and 68 in the IMG. The differences among the groups were not significant at baseline. ICI developed in 41 of the 261 infants (15.7%). The incidence of ICI varied significantly among the groups: 22.3% in the CG (21/94), 18.2% in the FG (18/99), and only 2.9% in the IMG (2/68) (P = .003). ICI was less frequent in the IMG compared with the CG (P <.001) and the FG (P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

The integrated measures approach is meaningful for the prevention of ICIs in preterm infants in NICUs with many patients but inadequate medical resources in some developing countries.

Recommendations for the management of candidemia in neonates in Latin America. Latin America Invasive Mycosis Network

Candidemia is one of the most frequent opportunistic mycoses worldwide. Limited epidemiological studies in Latin America indicate that incidence rates are higher in this region than in the Northern Hemisphere. Diagnosis is often made late in the infection, affecting the initiation of antifungal therapy. A more scientific approach, based on specific parameters, for diagnosis and management of candidemia in Latin America is warranted. 'Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of candidemia' are a series of manuscripts that have been developed by members of the Latin America Invasive Mycosis Network. They aim to provide a set of best-evidence recommendations for the diagnosis and management of candidemia. This publication, 'Recommendations for the management of candidemia in neonates in Latin America', was written to provide guidance to healthcare professionals on the management of neonates who have, or who are at risk of, candidemia. Computerized searches of existing literature were performed by PubMed. The data were extensively reviewed and analyzed by members of the group. The group also met on two occasions to pose questions, discuss conflicting views, and deliberate on a series of management recommendations. 'Recommendations for the management of candidemia in neonates in Latin America' includes prophylaxis, empirical therapy, therapy for proven candidemia, patient work-up following diagnosis of candidemia, central venous catheter management, and management of complications. This manuscript is the fourth of this series that deals with diagnosis and treatment of invasive candidiasis. Other publications in this series include: 'Recommendations for the diagnosis of candidemia in Latin America', 'Recommendations for the management of candidemia in adults in Latin America', and 'Recommendations for the management of candidemia in children in Latin America'.

[Recommendations for the management of candidemia in neonates in Latin America. Grupo Proyecto Épico]

Candidemia is one of the most frequent opportunistic mycoses worldwide. Limited epidemiological studies in Latin America indicate that incidence rates are higher in this region than in the Northern Hemisphere. Diagnosis is often made late in the infection, affecting the initiation of antifungal therapy. A more scientific approach, based on specific parameters, for diagnosis and management of candidemia in Latin America is warranted. 'Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of candidemia' are a series of manuscripts that have been developed by members of the Latin America Invasive Mycosis Network. They aim to provide a set of best-evidence recommendations for the diagnosis and management of candidemia. This publication, 'Recommendations for the management of candidemia in neonates in Latin America', was written to provide guidance to healthcare professionals on the management of neonates who have, or who are at risk of, candidemia. Computerized searches of existing literature were performed by PubMed. The data were extensively reviewed and analyzed by members of the group. The group also met on two occasions to pose questions, discuss conflicting views, and deliberate on a series of management recommendations. 'Recommendations for the management of candidemia in neonates in Latin America' includes prophylaxis, empirical therapy, therapy for proven candidemia, patient work-up following diagnosis of candidemia, central venous catheter management, and management of complications. This manuscript is the fourth of this series that deals with diagnosis and treatment of invasive candidiasis. Other publications in this series include: 'Recommendations for the diagnosis of candidemia in Latin America', 'Recommendations for the management of candidemia in adults in Latin America', and 'Recommendations for the management of candidemia in children in Latin America'.

Prophylactic systemic antifungal agents to prevent mortality and morbidity in very low birth weight infants

BACKGROUND

Invasive fungal infection is an important cause of mortality and morbidity in very low birth weight infants. Early diagnosis is difficult and treatment is often delayed. Systemic antifungal agents (usually azoles) are increasingly used as prophylaxis against invasive fungal infection.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of prophylactic systemic antifungal therapy on mortality and morbidity in very low birth weight infants.

SEARCH METHODS

We used the standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. This included searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 3), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL (to August 2012), conference proceedings, and previous reviews.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials or quasi-randomised controlled trials that compared the effect of prophylactic systemic antifungal therapy versus placebo or no drug or another antifungal agent or dose regimen in very low birth weight infants.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We extracted data using the standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group, with separate evaluation of trial quality and data extraction by two review authors.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 11 eligible trials enrolling a total of 1136 infants. Seven trials (involving 880 infants) compared systemic antifungal prophylaxis versus placebo or no drug. These trials were generally small but of good methodological quality. Meta-analysis found a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of invasive fungal infection in infants who received systemic antifungal prophylaxis (typical risk ratio (RR) 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27 to 0.61; risk difference (RD) -0.09, 95% CI -0.14 to -0.05). The average incidence of invasive fungal infection in the control groups of the trials (16%) was much higher than that generally reported from large cohort studies (< 5%). Meta-analysis did not find a statistically significant difference in the risk of death prior to hospital discharge (typical RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.05; RD -0.04, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.01). Very limited data on long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes were available. Two trials that compared systemic versus oral or topical non-absorbed antifungal prophylaxis did not detect any statistically significant effects on invasive fungal infection or mortality. Two trials that compared different dose regimens of prophylactic intravenous fluconazole did not detect any significant differences in infection rates or mortality.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic systemic antifungal therapy reduces the incidence of invasive fungal infection in very low birth weight infants. This finding should be interpreted and applied cautiously since the incidence of invasive fungal infection was very high in the control groups of most of the included trials. Meta-analysis does not demonstrate a statistically significant effect on mortality. There are currently only limited data on the long-term neurodevelopmental consequences for infants exposed to this intervention. In addition, there is a need for further data on the effect of the intervention on the emergence of organisms with antifungal resistance.

Chemoprophylaxis of neonatal fungal infections in very low birthweight infants: efficacy and safety of fluconazole and nystatin

AIM

To review the use of antifungal chemoprophylaxis to prevent neonatal invasive fungal infections (IFI) in very low birthweight infants (VLBW <1500 g).

METHOD

Systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

RESULTS

Nine trials were identified (2029 infants), with six comparing fluconazole with placebo/no treatment (840 infants), three comparing nystatin with placebo/no treatment (1200 infants) and two comparing fluconazole and nystatin (257 infants). Prophylactic fluconazole reduced the incidence of IFI in VLBW infants <1500 g to 5.1% compared with 16.0% in infants receiving placebo, relative risk (RR) = 0.36 (95% confidence interval 0.15-0.89). The mortality was 10.9% and 16.7%, respectively (RR 0.76, 0.54-1.08). Oral nystatin reduced the incidence of IFI in VLBW infants to 5.3% compared with 28.0% in infants receiving placebo (RR 0.16, 0.11-0.23). Mortality was 7.5% with nystatin and 10.9% with placebo (RR 0.86, 0.59-1.26). The incidence of IFI in studies comparing fluconazole and nystatin was 3.6% and 8.0%, respectively (RR 0.54, 0.19-1.56), and mortality was not significantly different: 4.6% versus 9.8% (RR 0.43, 0-4.31)

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic fluconazole and oral nystatin are both highly effective in preventing IFI in VLBW infants. Both agents are safe without significant toxicities. Antifungal prophylaxis should therefore be used in all VLBW infants. Given the paucity of data comparing fluconazole with nystatin, the choice of antifungal agent should be influenced by the incidence of IFI, local epidemiology and relative cost.

Sepsis in the neonate

In the neonatal intensive care unit, critical care nurses who are not advanced practice nurses cannot make the medical diagnosis of infection/sepsis in the neonate. Even so, the critical care nurse has a critical role in dealing with sepsis infection. The nurse must (1) have a high index of suspicion about the risk of infection, (2) be able to recognize septic/infected newborns, (3) report related concerns to the physician or advanced practice nurse, and (4) advocate on behalf of the infant to ensure a timely diagnostic workup and empiric antibiotics. This article is a guide for understanding issues related to sepsis in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Therapeutic strategies for invasive fungal infections in neonatal and pediatric patients

Invasive Candida and Aspergillus infections are the most commonly encountered fungal infections. They appear to be life threatening in the setting of profound immunosuppression, whereas cases that are resistant to antifungal therapy are occasionally encountered. Novel antifungal triazole and echinocandin agents appear to exhibit good activity as first-line or salvage therapy, whereas the use of amphotericin B formulations is particularly valuable in neonates. Significant differences in toxicity have been demonstrated among various antifungal agents with in vitro activity from available comparative data on fungal infections in children: however, no clear difference in treatment efficacy has been demonstrated. However, very little data are available about neonates. Host factors and responsible fungal species most frequently guide the choice of therapy.

Prophylactic systemic antifungal agents to prevent mortality and morbidity in very low birth weight infants

BACKGROUND

Invasive fungal infection is an important cause of mortality and morbidity in very low birth weight infants. Early diagnosis is difficult, and treatment is often delayed. The available data are insufficient to conclude that topical/oral prophylaxis (usually nystatin and/or miconazole) prevents invasive fungal infection or mortality in very low birth weight infants. Systemic antifungal agents (usually azoles) are increasingly used as prophylaxis against invasive fungal infection.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of prophylactic systemic antifungal therapy on mortality and morbidity in very low birth weight infants.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group was used. This included searches of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2007), MEDLINE (1966 - May 2007), EMBASE (1980 - May 2007), conference proceedings, and previous reviews.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials that compared the effect of prophylactic systemic antifungal therapy versus placebo, or no drug, or another antifungal agent or dose regimen, in very low birth weight infants.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted using the standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group, with separate evaluation of trial quality and data extraction by each author, and synthesis of data using relative risk, risk difference, and weighted mean difference. The pre-specified outcomes were death prior to hospital discharge, long-term neurodevelopment, incidence of invasive fungal infection, emergence of antifungal resistance, and adverse drug reactions.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven eligible trials enrolling a total of 638 participating infants were identified. Meta-analysis of data from four trials that compared prophylactic fluconazole versus placebo revealed a statistically significant reduction in the risk of invasive fungal infection in the infants who received prophylaxis [typical relative risk: 0.23 (95% confidence interval 0.11, 0.46); typical risk difference: -0.11 (95% confidence interval -0.16, -0.06); number needed to treat: 9 (95% confidence interval 6, 17)]. There was no statistically significant difference in the risk of death prior to hospital discharge [typical relative risk: 0.61 (95% confidence interval 0.37, 1.03); typical risk difference: -0.05 (95% confidence interval -0.11, -0.00)]. Only one trial reported long term neurodevelopmental outcomes. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of developmental delay, or motor or sensory neurological impairment in children assessed at a median age of 16 months. One small trial that compared systemic versus oral/topical prophylaxis did not detect a statistically significant effect on invasive fungal infection or mortality. Two trials compared different dosing regimens of prophylactic intravenous fluconazole. These did not detect any significant differences in infection rates or mortality.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic systemic antifungal therapy reduces the incidence of invasive fungal infection in very low birth weight infants. This finding should be interpreted cautiously. The incidence of invasive fungal infection was very high in the control groups of some of the included trials. Furthermore, the trials may have been affected by ascertainment bias since use of prophylactic fluconazole may reduce the sensitivity of microbiological culture for detecting fungi in blood, urine, or cerebrospinal fluid. Meta-analysis does not demonstrate a statistically significant effect on overall mortality rates, but the 95% confidence interval around this estimate of effect is wide. There are currently only limited data on the long-term neurodevelopmental consequences for infants exposed to this intervention. In addition, there is a need for further data on the effect of the intervention on the emergence of organisms with antifungal resistance.