Inhaled salbutamol for wheezy infants: a randomised controlled trial

European Respiratory Society statement on preschool wheezing disorders: updated definitions, knowledge gaps and proposed future research directions

Since the publication of the European Respiratory Society (ERS) task force reports on the management of preschool wheezing in 2008 and 2014, a large body of evidence has accumulated suggesting that the clinical phenotypes that were proposed (episodic (viral) wheezing and multiple-trigger wheezing) do not relate to underlying airway pathology and may not help determine response to treatment. Specifically, using clinical phenotypes alone may no longer be appropriate, and new approaches that can be used to inform clinical care are needed for future research. This ERS task force reviewed the literature published after 2008 related to preschool wheezing and has suggested that the criteria used to define wheezing disorders in preschool children should include age of diagnosis (0 to <6 years), confirmation of wheezing on at least one occasion, and more than one episode of wheezing ever. Furthermore, diagnosis and management may be improved by identifying treatable traits, including inflammatory biomarkers (blood eosinophils, aeroallergen sensitisation) associated with type-2 immunity and differential response to inhaled corticosteroids, lung function parameters and airway infection. However, more comprehensive use of biomarkers/treatable traits in predicting the response to treatment requires prospective validation. There is evidence that specific genetic traits may help guide management, but these must be adequately tested. In addition, the task force identified an absence of caregiver-reported outcomes, caregiver/self-management options and features that should prompt specialist referral for this age group. Priorities for future research include a focus on identifying 1) mechanisms driving preschool wheezing; 2) biomarkers of treatable traits and efficacy of interventions in those without allergic sensitisation/eosinophilia; 3) the need to include both objective outcomes and caregiver-reported outcomes in clinical trials; 4) the need for a suitable action plan for children with preschool wheezing; and 5) a definition of severe/difficult-to-treat preschool wheezing.

Bronchodilator response in wheezing infants assessed by the raised volume rapid thoracic compression technique

BACKGROUND

Bronchodilator response (BDR) analyzed by the raised volume rapid thoracic compression (RVRTC) in wheezing infants is not yet well described, although bronchodilators (BD) are routine in the treatment of this population.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate BDR by RVRTC technique in infants with recurrent wheezing and compare to control group.

METHOD

Cross sectional study, 45 infants, age 56 weeks (38-67 weeks). Two groups: wheezing group (WG: history of recurrent wheezing) and control group (CG). RVRTC was evaluated, FVC, FEV_0.5, FEF₅₀, FEF₇₅, FEF_85, FEF_25-75 were measured. Salbutamol was delivered to infants and RVRTC evaluated again. BDR was determined by the increase greater than two standard deviation from the mean change in the CG.

RESULTS

In WG (n = 32) lung function was worse than in CG (n = 13): FEV_0.5: 0.0(-0.9-0.9z score) vs 0.8(0.2-1.4z score); FEF₅₀: 0.2(-0.3-1.1z score) vs 0.9(0.5-1.4z score); and FEF_25-75: 0.2(-0.5-1.1z score) vs 1.1(0.6-1.6z score), respectively, p < 0.05. Both groups had similar increase after BD. In WG 11 patients (34%) were responder and these had worse lung function compared to nonresponder (n = 21) (p < 0.05). The increase in lung function after BD in responder was higher than in nonresponder: FEV_0.5: 6.5(2.1-7.1%) vs -0.5(-2.5-0.7%), FEF₅₀: 5.1(2.7-11.7%) vs 0.4(-1.1-2.8%), FEF₇₅: 20.7(4.7-23.6%) vs -1.3(-6.4-3.9%), FEF_25-75: 9.9(3.8-16.4%) vs 0.0(-1.5-1.0%), respectively, p < 0.05.

CONCLUSION

34% WG showed BDR measured by the RVRTC. The best variables to detect BDR were FEF₇₅, FEF_25-75 and FEV_0.5. Patients with worse lung function showed better response to BD.

Bronchodilator responsiveness in wheezy infants predicts continued early childhood respiratory morbidity

OBJECTIVE

Spirometry including bronchodilator responsiveness is considered routine in the workup of asthma in older children. However, in wheezy infants the existence of bronchodilator responsiveness and its prognostic significance remain unclear.

METHODS

Infants (< 2 years) with chronic or recurrent wheezing or coughing were evaluated by infant pulmonary function testing (PFT). Maximal expiratory flow at the point of functional residual capacity (V̇maxFRC) was measured before and 20 minutes after salbutamol administration. Only infants with an obstructive profile (V̇maxFRC < 80% predicted) were included. The infants were divided into two groups with regard to whether or not a response to salbutamol was observed on PFT. A response was defined as a mean V̇maxFRC after salbutamol administration exceeding the upper confidence interval limit of individual pre-bronchodilator V̇maxFRC measurements. Follow-up data was gathered after a mean of 2 years.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Sixty infants were included in the study of which 32 (53%) demonstrated responsiveness to bronchodilators. The infants in the responsive group had a significantly higher frequency of physician visits for wheezing than the non-responders (3.0 mean visits/yr vs. 1.5 respectively, P = 0.03), and had a higher likelihood of having received asthma medication in the last year of the follow-up period (84% vs. 50% respectively, RR: 1.68[1.10-2.56]). At the end of the follow-up period, more parents in the responsive group reported continued respiratory disease (71% vs. 22%, RR:3.21[1.30-7.95]).

CONCLUSIONS

Bronchodilator responsiveness can be demonstrated by infant PFT in infants with recurrent wheezing and can predict increased respiratory morbidity until 3 years of age.

Intravenous salbutamol for childhood asthma: evidence-based medicine?

Intravenous salbutamol is commonly used to treat children with severe asthma unresponsive to inhaled β2-agonist therapy. However, in this setting, there is little clinical trial data demonstrating its effectiveness. Additionally, there are significant concerns that intravenous salbutamol-dosing recommendations for children with acute asthma are excessive, and unnecessarily raise the potential for adverse reactions, such as lactic acidosis and tachycardia which, by increasing respiratory workload, exacerbate respiratory failure. Here, we review salbutamol clinical pharmacology and toxicology, evidence relating to its use in acute asthma and highlight gaps in the evidence base.

Respiratory syncytial virus induces leukotriene C4 synthase expression in bronchial epithelial cells

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) results in acute wheezing in infants and is frequently associated with recurrent wheezing. Although RSV-induced wheezing clinically resembles that of asthma, corticosteroids are not equivalently effective in RSV-associated wheezing. The study sought to determine the mechanisms of RSV-induced wheezing by establishing an in vitro model of RSV-infected human bronchial epithelial cells (16-HBEC).

METHODS

Leukotriene C4 synthase (LTC4 S) messenger RNA (mRNA) expression in 16-HBEC was detected using fluorescence quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and the relative level of LTC4 S mRNA was expressed as quotient cycle threshold (qCt) based on the threshold cycle number value compared with that of β-actin. Cysteinyl leukotrienes (CysLT) in culture supernatant were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RSV-infected 16-HBEC was incubated with gradient concentration of budesonide (BUD) to assess its effects on LTC4 S expression and CysLT secretion.

RESULTS

RSV infection resulted in increased LTC4 S mRNA expression between 48 and 96 h post-infection. High level of CysLT was detected in the supernatant of RSV-infected 16-HBEC. BUD at concentrations of 10(-10) to 10(-5) mol/L did not significantly alter LTC4 S mRNA expression.

CONCLUSIONS

RSV infection upregulated LTC4 S expression in HBEC leading to increased CysLT secretion. Such induction was not attenuated by BUD, suggesting that CysLT might contribute to the pathogenesis of RSV-induced wheezing.

Pharmacological approach to wheezing in preschool children

INTRODUCTION

Wheezing disorders are very common during childhood (particularly among preschool children), and represent a significant burden for patients, their families, the healthcare system, and society as a whole. Identifying wheezing phenotypes, and recognizing the risk factors associated with each, may help to predict long-term outcomes, distinguish high-risk children who may benefit from secondary prevention measures, and ensure that the most effective therapy is prescribed for each case.

AREAS COVERED

The main aim of this review is to analyze the characteristics of the drugs currently used to treat wheezing in preschool children, and discuss the results obtained in children with different wheezing phenotypes.

EXPERT OPINION

The continuous or intermittent administration of various oral or inhaled drugs could theoretically be effective in preventing or controlling wheezing in preschool children. However, the optimal management of acute preschool wheezing episodes has not yet been determined mainly because of their phenotypical heterogeneity.

The management of pre-school wheeze

Wheeze, a common symptom in pre-school children, is a continuous high-pitched sound, with a musical quality, emitting from the chest during expiration. A pragmatic clinical classification is episodic (viral) wheeze and multiple-trigger wheeze. Diagnostic difficulties include other conditions that give rise to noisy breathing which could be misinterpreted as wheeze. Most preschool children with wheeze do not need rigorous investigations. Primary prevention is not possible but avoidance of environmental tobacco smoke exposure should be strongly encouraged. Bronchodilators provide symptomatic relief in acute wheezy episodes but the evidence for using oral steroids is conflicting for children presenting to the Emergency Department [ED]. Parent initiated oral steroid courses cannot be recommended. High dose inhaled corticosteroids [ICS] used intermittently are effective in children with frequent episodes of moderately severe episodic (viral) wheeze or multiple-trigger wheeze, but this associated with short term effects on growth and cannot be recommended as a routine. Maintenance treatment with low to moderate continuous ICS in pure episodic (viral) wheeze is ineffective. Whilst low to moderate dose regular ICS work in multi-trigger wheeze, the medication does not modify the natural history of the condition. Even if there is a successful trial of treatment with ICS, a break in treatment should be given to see if the symptoms have resolved or continuous therapy is still required. Maintenance as well as intermittent Montelukast has a role in both episodic and multi trigger wheeze. Good multidisciplinary support and education is essential in managing this common condition.

[Should children be treated with ephedrine mixture?]

Lower respiratory tract infections are common in small children, and are often associated with obstruction of the respiratory tract and coughing. In Norway, symptomatic treatment with ephedrine is common in children. The clinical effect of such treatment is not sufficiently documented and serious adverse drug reactions have been reported in small children administered sympathomimetic medication. This article presents current knowledge of clinical effects and adverse drug reactions of ephedrine in infants and children, and discusses the practical implications of these findings.

Chronic respiratory symptoms and diseases among indigenous children

Children from Indigenous populations experience more frequent, severe, and recurrent lower respiratory infections as infants and toddlers. The consequences of these infections are chronic lung disorders manifested by recurrent wheezing and chronic productive cough. These symptoms are aggravated more frequently by active and passive tobacco smoke exposure among Indigenous groups. Therapies for these symptoms, although not specific to children of Indigenous origins, are described as is the evidence for their use.

[Recurrent wheezing in three year-olds: facts and opportunities]

The 3 year-old group of children has an increased incidence and prevalence of recurrent wheezing episodes. There are different subgroups, who give different inflammatory responses to different triggering agents, and subgroups that differ in aetiopathology and immunopathology. Current diagnostic methods (exhaled nitric oxide in multiple breaths, nitric oxide in exhaled air condensate, induced sputum, broncho-alveolar lavage and endo-bronchial biopsy), enable the inflammatory pattern to be identified and to give the most effective and safe treatment. The various therapeutic options for treatment are reviewed, such as inhaled glucocorticoids when the inflammatory phenotype is eosinophilic, and leukotriene receptor antagonists, when the inflammatory phenotype is predominantly neutrophilic. In accordance with the current recommendations, for the diagnosis as well as for the therapy initiated in children of this age, they must be regularly reviewed, so that if the benefit is not clear, the treatment must be stopped and an alternative diagnosis and treatment considered. The start of treatment should be determined depending on the intensity and frequency of the symptoms, with the aim of decreasing morbidity and increasing the quality of life of the patient.

Recurrent respiratory infections

The child who has recurrent infections poses one of the most difficult diagnostic challenges in pediatrics. The clinician faces a two-fold challenge in determining first whether the child is normal or has a serious disease, and then, in the latter case, how to confirm or exclude the diagnosis with the minimum number of the least invasive tests. It is hoped that, in the absence of good-quality evidence for most clinical scenarios, the experience-based approach described in this article may prove a useful guide to the clinician.

Wheeze in preschool children

Exercise induced wheeze and atopic disorders predict persistent asthma

Beta2-agonists for asthma: the pediatric perspective

Inhaled beta-agonists are commonly prescribed for the treatment of wheezing disorders in infants and children. Despite this, there are concerns that these medications have potentially detrimental effects on lung health and symptoms. We will review the ontogeny of beta-agonist receptor and smooth muscle development from fetal life through infancy and childhood as well as the evidence supporting the clinical utility of beta-agonists in wheezing infants and asthmatic children. Finally, the potential detrimental effects of long- and short-acting beta-agonists in infants and children are discussed.

Asthma therapy for children under 5 years of age

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The evidence for effectiveness of currently used asthma medication for wheeze in young children is reviewed.

RECENT FINDINGS

The management of the infant and preschool child with wheezing is complicated by the uncertainty with respect to the aetiology. Difficulties in defining phenotypes and objective outcome parameters combined with the transient nature of symptoms which often resolve spontaneously have confounded many therapeutic studies. Recent studies on the effect of pharmacotherapy in wheezing infants have tried to define a more homogeneous phenotype as well as make a selection of patients that are likely to respond to the studied drug. In addition, these studies have used lung function parameters and nitric oxide as one of the outcome measurements. Studies on the nature of inflammation and the development of airway remodelling in infants and young children are done to further define phenotypes.

SUMMARY

Currently, there are no evidence-based guidelines and not even consensus statements on the right approach in pharmacological treatment of wheezing in infants and preschool children. The main issue still is the difficulty in coming to a correct diagnosis. Further studies are needed on the nature and the diagnostics of phenotypes and on the effect of early intervention.

Persistent cough and failure to thrive: a presentation of foreign body aspiration in a child with asthma

Severe failure to thrive (FTT) in a child with asthma and a persistent cough should not be explained solely by asthma and warrants a thorough and prompt evaluation. The finding of a foreign body in our case was surprising, because it does not usually present as or lead to FTT. Good clinical judgment and habits could prevent the course of events that we described in this case. Following are the key lessons to be learned from this presentation: (1) maintain a high index of suspicion for foreign body aspiration, even in toddlers with asthma, (2) pay special attention to a child with FTT, (3) be aware of localizing findings on physical examination and chest radiographs, and (4) perform a chest radiograph no later than after 1 month of chronic cough.

Response to bronchodilator in infants with bronchiolitis can be predicted from wheeze characteristics

OBJECTIVE

Lung sounds analysis has been used for clinical care. Our objectives were to characterize the spectral pattern of lung sounds and their relation to bronchodilator effects in acute bronchiolitis (AB). We hypothesized that patients with sinusoidal wheezes (SW) would show a more significant bronchodilator response.

METHODOLOGY

We studied 22 asleep hospitalized infants (14 boys, eight girls), aged 5.2 +/- 1 months, 16 with a positive respiratory syncytial virus test, during their first 3 days after admission. Patients breathed spontaneously through a face mask connected to a pneumotachograph during normal breathing, and only target flows of 0.1 +/- 0.02 L/s were analyzed. Sounds were obtained using two contact sensors attached over both posterior lower lobes. For inspiratory and expiratory sounds, we determined the frequencies below which 25% (F25), 50% (F50), 75% (F75) and 99% (SEF99) of the spectral power between 100 and 1000 Hz was contained. We repeated the measurements 20 min after bronchodilator therapy in all patients.

RESULTS

We found classic SW in 11 patients, while the other 11 had complex wheezes (CW). There were positive bronchodilator responses in 9/11 with SW and 3/11 with CW (P < 0.01). Patients who responded to salbutamol showed an increase in power at low frequencies after medication (P < 0.01), and a positive correlation between wheezing and the increase in the power spectra measured by F50 and SEF99 (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that sinusoidal and complex wheezes occur in patients with AB, that a positive response to bronchodilator is significantly more common in those with classic SW and that lung sounds analysis is a reproducible, safe and non-invasive method for assessing wheeze in infants.

The response to β-agonists in wheezy infants: three methods compared

BACKGROUND

Studies into the effects of salbutamol in the treatment of wheeze in infancy have been conflicting, possibly due to differences in outcome variables. We aimed to assess the response to salbutamol using indices derived from passive and forced expiration.

METHODS

We recruited 39 infants who had a history of wheezing (mean age 43 weeks) and measured maximum flow at functional residual capacity (V'(max FRC)) by rapid thoracoabdominal compression (RTC), and forced expired volume at 0.4s (FEV0.4) using the raised-volume RTC technique (RV-RTC). We calculated passive compliance (C(rs)), resistance (R(rs)) and time constant (tau) from relaxed expirations that followed the augmented inspirations delivered during RV-RTC. Measurements were repeated after aerosol salbutamol (800 mcg).

RESULTS

Data were obtained in 32 infants for V'(max FRC), 22 for FEV0.4 and 19 for passive mechanics. There were no mean changes in any index of forced expiration after salbutamol. Some individuals showed significant changes (improvement or worsening) in one or other index. Overall, there was a small increase in C(rs) after salbutamol but no change in R(rs) or tau.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no consistent pattern of response in either index of forced expiration. Validated clinical scores or alternative physiological techniques may be preferable to respiratory mechanics in assessing bronchodilator response.

Is bronchodilator response in 2-yr-old children associated with asthma risk factors?

Factors that might influence lung function bronchodilator response by 2 yr of age is largely unknown, thus we aimed to assess this in the 'Environment and Childhood asthma' (ECA) study in Oslo. A clinical investigation at mean age 26 months was attended by 516 (84%) children included in a nested case-control study [children with recurrent bronchial obstruction (rBO)] (n = 265) and controls without a history of lower respiratory disease (n = 251). Tidal lung function measures before and after inhaled nebulized salbutamol (bronchodilator response) (when clinically without BO) were obtained in 46%. Clinical characteristics and personal and family history of allergic/respiratory diseases (asthma risk factors) were ascertained by structured interview and clinical examination. Allergic sensitization was assessed by skin prick test/specific IgE antibody analyses to common allergens. Mean (95% CI) per cent change in time to reach peak flow/total expiratory time (t(PTEF)/t(E)) from before to after salbutamol was significantly larger in children with rBO [17.3 (9.4-25.3) than controls (-2.2 (-7.7 to 3.0)]. The bronchodilator response increased significantly (p = 0.001) with increasing number of asthma risk factors, but was not significantly associated with allergic sensitization, parental 'atopy', or maternal smoking alone. Children treated with inhaled corticosteroids had greater bronchodilator response than those treated with bronchodilators alone. Bronchodilator response in asymptomatic 2-yr-old children was most closely associated with the presence of rBO, but increasing number of asthma risk factors and treatment with inhaled corticosteroids were associated with increased bronchodilator response.

Bronchodilation in infants with malacia or recurrent wheeze

BACKGROUND

Controversy remains regarding the effectiveness of bronchodilators in wheezy infants.

AIMS

To assess the effect of inhaled beta(2) agonists on lung function in infants with malacia or recurrent wheeze, and to determine whether a negative effect of beta(2) agonists on forced expiratory flow (V'(maxFRC)) is more pronounced in infants with airway malacia, compared to infants with wheeze.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed lung function data of 27 infants: eight with malacia, 19 with recurrent wheeze. Mean (SD) age was 51 (18) weeks. Mean V'(maxFRC) (in Z score) was assessed before and after inhalation of beta(2) agonists.

RESULTS

Baseline V'(maxFRC) was below reference values for both groups. Following inhalation of beta(2) agonists the mean (95% CI) change in mean V'(maxFRC) in Z scores was -0.10 (-0.26 to 0.05) and -0.33 (-0.55 to -0.11) for the malacia and wheeze group, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In infants with wheeze, inhaled beta(2) agonists caused a significant reduction in mean V'(maxFRC). Infants with malacia were not more likely to worsen after beta(2) agonists than were infants with recurrent wheeze.

Short acting beta agonists for recurrent wheeze in children under 2 years of age

BACKGROUND

Wheeze is a common symptom in infancy and is a common cause for both primary care consultations and hospital admission. Beta2-adrenoceptor agonists (b2-agonists) are the most frequently used as bronchodilator but their efficacy is questionable.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of b2-agonist for the treatment of infants with recurrent and persistent wheeze.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Relevant trials were identified using the Cochrane Airways Group database (CENTRAL), Medline and Pubmed. The database search used the following terms: Wheeze or asthma and Infant or Child and Short acting beta-agonist or Salbutamol (variants), Albuterol, Terbutaline (variants), Orciprenaline, Fenoterol

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing the effect of b2-agonist against placebo in children under 2 years of age who had had two or more previous episodes of wheeze, not related to another form of chronic lung disease.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Eight studies met the criteria for inclusion in this meta-analysis. The studies investigated patients in three settings: at home (3 studies), in hospital (2 studies) and in the pulmonary function laboratory (3 studies). The main outcome measure was change in respiratory rate except for community based studies where symptom scores were used.

MAIN RESULTS

The studies were markedly heterogeneous and between study comparisons were limited. Improvement in respiratory rate, symptom score and oxygen saturation were noted in one study in the emergency department following two salbutamol nebulisers but this had no impact on hospital admission. There was a reduction in bronchial reactivity following salbutamol. There was no significant benefit from taking regular inhaled salbutamol on symptom scores recorded at home.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

There is no clear benefit of using b2-agonists in the management of recurrent wheeze in the first two years of life although there is conflicting evidence. At present, further studies should only be performed if the patient group can be clearly defined and there is a suitable outcome parameter capable of measuring a response.

Parental education and guided self-management of asthma and wheezing in the pre-school child: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The effects on morbidity were examined of providing an educational intervention and a written guided self-management plan to the parents of pre-school children following a recent attendance at hospital for asthma or wheeze.

METHODS

A prospective, randomised, partially blinded, controlled trial was designed at two secondary care centres. Over a 13 month period 200 children aged 18 months to 5 years at the time of admission to a children's ward or attendance at an accident and emergency department or children's (emergency) assessment unit (A&E/CAU) with a primary diagnosis of acute severe asthma or wheezing were recruited. 101 children were randomised into the control group and received usual care and 99 were assigned to the intervention group and received: (1) a pre-school asthma booklet; (2) a written guided self-management plan; and (3) two 20 minute structured educational sessions between a specialist respiratory nurse and the parent(s) and child. Subjects were assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months. The main outcomes were GP consultation rates, hospital re-admissions, and attendances at A&E/CAU. Secondary outcomes included disability score, caregivers' quality of life, and parental knowledge of asthma.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups during the 12 month follow up period for any of the main or secondary outcome measures.

CONCLUSIONS

These results do not support the hypothesis that the introduction of an educational package and a written guided self-management plan to the parents of pre-school children with asthma who had recently attended hospital for troublesome asthma or wheeze reduces morbidity over the subsequent 12 months.

Persistent wheezing in infants with an atopic tendency responds to inhaled fluticasone

BACKGROUND

The role of inhaled corticosteroids for the treatment of wheeze in infancy remains unclear.

AIM

To investigate the effect of inhaled fluticasone on symptoms in a group of wheezy infants who had a high risk of progressing to childhood asthma.

METHODS

A total of 52 infants, under 1 year of age, with a history of wheeze or cough and a history (personal or first degree relative) of atopy were prescribed either 150 microg fluticasone twice daily (group F) or placebo (group P), via metered dose inhaler, for 12 weeks following a two week run in period. Symptoms were scored in a parent held diary and the mean daily symptom score (MDS) and symptom free days (SFD) calculated for each two week period.

RESULTS

Thirty seven infants completed the study. Both MDS and SFD improved significantly between the run in and final two week period in group F, but not group P, with a mean difference in change (95% CI) between groups of 1.12 (0.05 to 2.18) for MDS and median difference of 3.0 (0.002 to 8.0) for SFD.

CONCLUSION

Improvement of clinical symptoms in response to fluticasone can be shown in this high risk group of infants. In the absence of effective alternatives inhaled corticosteroids should be considered in this patient group.

Clinical applications of infant lung function testing: does it contribute to clinical decision making?

Infant lung function testing is important in clinical research and recent standardisation efforts have enabled measurements to be made in infants in different laboratories throughout the world. Thus, the theoretical conditions are now fulfilled for use of these techniques in clinical practice. This review discusses the usefulness of various infant lung function techniques in a clinical setting and their potential present or future clinical application. It will focus on the role of infant lung function in the clinical management of infants with respiratory disease.

Inhaled short acting beta2-agonist use in asthma: regular vs as needed treatment

BACKGROUND

Inhaled beta2-adrenergic agonists delivered by inhalation are very widely used in asthma. There has been much controversy of the use and possible consequences of the use of these agents for regular, as opposed as-needed use in asthma.

OBJECTIVES

This review to assessed the clinical trial evidence to test whether using regular use of short-acting beta2-agonists reduced asthma control and pulmonary function; worsened symptoms, airway reactivity and quality of life; and increased the rate of exacerbations.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A search was carried out of the Cochrane Airways Group "Asthma and Wheez* RCT" register using the terms: regular AND [beta agonist OR bronchodilator OR salbutamol OR albuterol Or terbutaline OR isoproterenol OR reproterol OR fenoterol]. Bibliographies of existing trials were searched and primary trial authors and pharmaceutical companies were approached for additional trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials in which the short-acting beta2-agonist was given regularly in the experimental group, together with an inhaled bronchodilator for relief of symptoms ('rescue use'). The control group consisted of matching placebo inhaled regularly, with an inhaled bronchodilator for as-needed 'rescue use'.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted and quality assessments were made by both reviewers. Parallel group and cross-over trials were analysed separately. Where possible data were pooled using a fixed effects model.

MAIN RESULTS

Over 800 abstracts were identified, following a review, 60 papers were requested for full assessment by both reviewers. 34 trials from 30 papers met the entry criteria. Data from 31 outcomes were analyzable. There was little difference between the treatments for nearly all outcomes. In cross-over studies, evening peak flow was better with regular treatment, weighted mean difference (WMD) 13.1 l/min (95% confidence interval 24.3, 1.9). In contrast, the FEV1 was better with as-needed treatment (WMD 157 ml (95% CI: 123, 192). Bronchial hyper reactivity was slightly better in the as-needed group, standardised mean difference 0.23, 95% CI: 0.52, 1.12.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

These results support current guidelines. There is little advantage in using short-acting beta2-agonists regularly, and potentially some small clinical disadvantage.