Double blind randomised controlled trial of topical glyceryl trinitrate in anal fissure

The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland guideline on the management of anal fissure

AIM

The management of anal fissure: ACPGBI position statement was written 15 years ago. [KLR Cross et al., Colorectal Dis, 2008]. Our aim was to update the guideline and provide recommendations on the most effective treatment for patients with anal fissures utilising a multidisciplinary, rigorous guideline methodology.

METHODS

The development process consisted of six phases. In phase 1 we defined the scope of the guideline. The patient population included patients with acute and chronic anal fissure. The target group was all practitioners (primary and secondary care) treating patients with fissures and, in addition, healthcare workers and patients who desired information regarding fissure management. In phase 2 we formed a guideline development group (GDG) including a methodologist. In phase 3 review questions were formulated, using a reversed PICO process, starting with possible recommendations based on the GDG's knowledge. In phase 4 a comprehensive literature search focused on existing systematic reviews addressing each review question, supplemented by more recent studies if appropriate. In phase 5 data were extracted from the included papers and checked by the GDG. If indicated, meta-analysis of systematic review data was updated by the GDG. During phase 6 the GDG members decided what recommendations could be made based on the evidence in the literature and strength of the recommendation was assessed using 'grade'.

RESULTS

This guideline is divided into two sections: Primary care which includes (i) diagnosis; (ii) basic treatment; (iii) topical treatment; and secondary care which includes (iv) botulinum toxin therapy; (v) surgical intervention and (vi) special situations (including pregnancy and breast-feeding patients, children, receptive anal intercourse and low-pressure fissures). A total of 23 recommendations were formulated. A new term clinically healed was described by the GDG.

CONCLUSION

This guideline provides an up-to-date evidence-based summary of the current knowledge of the management of anal fissure and may serve as a useful guide for clinicians as well as a potential reference for patients.

Evaluation of the Incidence of Anal Fissures in Patients who Systemic Isotretinoin Therapy for Acne

INTRODUCTION

Isotretinoin is an effective drug widely used in the treatment of severe acne. In this study, we tried to evaluate the incidence of anal fissures with clinical and laboratory side effects associated with isotretinoin.

METHODS

The study evaluated 210 patients who received systemic isotretinoin treatment. Especially patients with constipation and anal bleeding were evaluated by the General Surgery clinic to arrange appropriate treatments.

RESULTS

Of 210 patients included in the study, 138 (65.7%) were female and 72 (34.3%) were male, with a mean age of 23.7 years. The most common adverse event was dry lips in 206 (98.1%) patients. The mucocutaneous side effects were constipation 36 (17.1%), anal bleeding 18 (8.6%), mucosal erosion 10 (4.7%), anal fissure 7 (3.3%). Treatment was discontinued due to elevated liver function tests in 5 patients (2.3%), and because anal bleeding could not be controlled in 1 patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Isotretinoin is the most effective acne medicine used today. Clarification of the patients about the rarely seen side effects such as dryness, erosion, fissure and bleeding in the anal mucosa in addition to the common mucocutaneous side effects will ensure that patients are more cautious and increase their tolerance to the treatment.

Anal Fissure in Children

Anal fissure is a common clinical problem in children and is defined as a longitudinal tear in the anal canal. The typical presentation is painful defecation and rectal bleeding. The etiology of anal fissure is unknown, but passage of hard stools and increased internal anal sphincter pressure are considered important factors. The treatment is oriented to relieve the spasm of the internal anal sphincter, which prevents healing of the fissure. Conservative management with stool softeners, topical analgesics, and sitz baths is recommended as first-choice therapy. Surgical treatment has been replaced by nonoperative management as definitive therapy, which is associated with a marginally higher success rate than placebo. Most recent studies have focused on nonoperative treatment with glyceryl trinitrate, calcium channel blockers, or botulinum toxin injection treatment. There are a few controlled studies to compare the different nonoperative treatment options in children. Success rates vary between the studies, and there is no clear evidence about which is the optimal nonoperative treatment. A significant recurrence rate has been reported after nonoperative management of anal fissure. It is important to treat constipation to avoid recurrent tears in the anal canal.

A prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial comparing the efficacy of polyethylene glycol versus polyethylene glycol combined with topical diltiazem for treating anal fissure in children

BACKGROUND

Anal fissure (AF) in children is usually treated with laxatives and/or topical agents such as calcium channel blockers. We hypothesize that owing to the superior efficacy of Polyethylene glycol (PEG) in treating constipation in children, adding diltiazem (DTZ) might not improve healing of AF.

METHODS

Children ≤14 years with anal fissure presented to the pediatric surgery clinic between November 2014 and March 2016 were recruited. Randomization was performed to either PEG with DTZ or PEG with placebo. Study personnel, patients, and their families were blinded. Primary outcome was resolution of symptoms. Secondary outcomes were constipation and treatment complications at 12-week follow up.

RESULTS

48 patients were randomized: 24 to PEG + DTZ and 24 to PEG + placebo. Both groups were similar in their baseline characteristics. At week 12, majority of patients' symptoms have improved without significant difference between groups; painful defecation at week 12: 20.8% and 8.3% (p-value 0.41), blood per rectum at week 12: 4.2% and 8.3% (p value 0.58) in the DTZ and placebo groups, respectively. Additionally, there was similar improvement in constipation in both groups.

CONCLUSION

PEG alone was associated with similar improvement in anal fissure symptoms in children compared to PEG and topical diltiazem combined.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Efficacy of nitroglycerine ointment in the treatment of pediatric anal fissure

BACKGROUND

Anal fissure is the most common anal disease in children. In the past few decades, the understanding of its pathophysiology has led to a progressive reduction in invasive procedures in favor of conservative treatment based on stool softeners and the relaxation of the anal sphincter. This randomized controlled study assessed the safety and efficacy of nitroglycerine (NTG) ointment in the treatment of pediatric anal fissure, which had not yet been proved.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An unequal randomized controlled study included 105 pediatric patients with anal fissure who had presented to the private and outpatient clinics of the Central Teaching Hospital of Pediatrics during the period from February 2015 to May 2016. The control group consisted of 70 patients. Both groups were treated with classical conservative therapy of sitz bath, stool softener, and local anesthetic. In the second group, chemical sphincterotomy with 0.2% NTG ointment was used in 35 patients, and was applied at the anal canal twice daily for 8weeks. The primary outcomes of symptomatic improvement and healed fissure, as well as side effects, were analyzed.

RESULTS

The average age of patients was 2years (range, 4months to 5years). Patients in the NTG group had 77% symptomatic relief and 60% healed fissure compared to the control group, which had 54% and 32.8% respectively. All were statistically significant. No serious adverse effects were noticed during the treatment period.

CONCLUSION

The use of 0.2% NTG ointment is an effective therapy for anal fissure in children in terms of good healing rate and rapid symptom relief, but it has the drawback of a long treatment period, making patient compliance more difficult, in addition to the problems of tolerance and recurrence.

TYPE OF STUDY

Prospective randomized controlled study (treatment study).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Type 2.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the treatment of anal fissure

BACKGROUND

Anal fissure has a very large number of treatment options. The choice is difficult. In an effort to assist in that, choice presented here is a systematic review and meta-analysis of all published treatments for anal fissure that have been studied in randomized controlled trials.

METHODS

Randomized trials were sought in the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Medline, EMBASE and the trials registry sites clinicaltrials.gov and who/int/ictrp/search/en. Abstracts were screened, full-text studies chosen, and finally eligible studies selected and abstracted. The review was then divided into those studies that compared two or more surgical procedures and those that had at least one arm that was non-surgical. Studies were further categorized by the specific interventions and comparisons. The outcome assessed was treatment failure. Negative effects of treatment assessed were headache and anal incontinence. Risk of bias was assessed for each study, and the strength of the evidence of each comparison was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-eight eligible trials were found and assessed, 31 in the surgical group and 117 in the non-surgical group. There were 14 different operations described in the surgical group and 29 different non-surgical treatments in the non-surgical group along with partial lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS). There were 61 different comparisons. Of these, 47 were reported in 2 or fewer studies, usually with quite small patient samples. The largest single comparison was glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) versus control with 19 studies. GTN was more effective than control in sustained cure (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.63-0.77), but the quality of evidence was very poor because of severe heterogeneity, and risk of bias due to inadequate clinical follow-up. The only comparison to have a GRADE quality of evidence of high was a subgroup analysis of LIS versus any medical therapy (OR 0.12; CI 0.07-0.21). Most of the other studies were downgraded in GRADE due to imprecision.

CONCLUSIONS

LIS is superior to non-surgical therapies in achieving sustained cure of fissure. Calcium channel blockers were more effective than GTN and with less risk of headache, but with only a low quality of evidence. Anal incontinence, once thought to be a frequent risk with LIS, was found in various subgroups in this review to have a risk between 3.4 and 4.4%. Among the surgical studies, manual anal stretch performed worse than LIS in the treatment of chronic anal fissure in adults. For those patients requiring surgery for anal fissure, open LIS and closed LIS appear to be equally efficacious, with a moderate GRADE quality of evidence. All other GRADE evaluations of procedures were low to very low due mostly to imprecision.

Utility of intranasal Ketamine and Midazolam to perform gastric aspirates in children: a double-blind, placebo controlled, randomized study

Background

We performed a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a sedation protocol based on intranasal Ketamine and Midazolam (INKM) administered by a mucosal atomizer device in uncooperative children undergoing gastric aspirates for suspected tuberculosis. Primary outcome: evaluation of Modified Objective Pain Score (MOPS) reduction in children undergoing INKM compared to the placebo group. Secondary outcomes: evaluation of safety of INKM protocol, start time sedation effect, duration of sedation and evaluation of parents and doctors’ satisfaction about the procedure.

Methods

In the sedation group, 19 children, mean age 41.5 months, received intranasal Midazolam (0.5 mg/kg) and Ketamine (2 mg/kg). In the placebo group, 17 children received normal saline solution twice in each nostril. The child’s degree of sedation was scored using the MOPS. A questionnaire was designed to evaluate the parents’ and doctors’ opinions on the procedures of both groups.

Results

Fifty-seven gastric washings were performed in the sedation-group, while in the placebo-group we performed 51 gastric aspirates. The degree of sedation achieved by INMK enabled all procedures to be completed without additional drugs. The mean duration of sedation was 71.5 min. Mean MOPS was 3.5 (range 1-8) in the sedation-group, 7.2 (range 4-9) in the placebo-group (p <0.0001). The questionnaire revealed high levels of satisfaction by both doctors and parents in the sedation-group compared to the placebo-group. The only side effect registered was post-sedation agitation in 6 procedures in the sedation group (10.5%).

Conclusions

Our experience suggests that atomized INKM makes gastric aspirates more acceptable and easy to perform in children.

Trial registration

Unique trial Number: UMIN000010623; Receipt Number: R000012422.

Long-term results of topical glyceryl trinitrate ointment in children with anal fissure

BACKGROUND/AIM

Although topical glyceryl trinitrate ointment (GTN) has become a popular treatment for anal fissure in adults, its use in children is still limited. We aimed to determine the effectiveness and safety of topical GTN in the long-term management of anal fissure in children, which has not yet been reported.

METHODS

Thirty-one children with anal fissure who received topical 0.2% GTN treatment between 1997 and 1998 were evaluated in 2004.

RESULTS

Ten patients had one or more relapses after initial treatment with 0.2% GTN, all within 1 year of first onset of anal fissure. No further recurrences were diagnosed during the 4-year follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

Although early recurrence can occur, topical GTN ointment is effective in healing chronic anal fissures in children.

An evidence-based systematic review of senna (Cassia senna) by the Natural Standard Research Collaboration

An evidence-based systematic review, including written and statistical analysis of scientific literature, expert opinion, folkloric precedent, history, pharmacology, kinetics/dynamics, interactions, adverse effects, toxicology, and dosing.

Non surgical therapy for anal fissure

BACKGROUND

Because of the disability associated with surgery for anal fissure and the risk of incontinence, medical alternatives for surgery have been sought. Most recently, pharmacologic methods that relax the anal smooth muscle, to accomplish reversibly what occurs in surgery, have been used to obtain fissure healing.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and morbidity of various medical therapies for anal fissure.

SEARCH METHODS

Search terms include "anal fissure randomized". Timing from 1966 to August 2010. Further details of the search below.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies in which participants were randomized to a non-surgical therapy for anal fissure. Comparison groups may include an operative procedure, an alternate medical therapy or placebo. Chronic fissure, acute fissure and fissure in children are included in the review. Atypical fissures associated with inflammatory bowel disease or cancer or anal infection are excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were abstracted from published reports and meeting abstracts, assessing method of randomization, blinding, "intention to treat" and drop-outs, therapies, supportive measures (applied to both groups), dosing and frequency and cross-overs. Dichotomous outcome measures included Non-healing of the fissure (a combination of persistence and recurrence), and Adverse events (including incontinence, headache, infection, anaphylaxis). Continuous outcome measures included measures of pain relief and anorectal manometry.

MAIN RESULTS

In this update 23 studies including 1236 participants is added to the 54 studies and 3904 participants in the 2008 publication, however 2 studies were from the last version reclassified as un included, so the final number of participants is 5031.49 different comparisons of the ability of medical therapies to heal anal fissure have been reported in 75 RCTs. Seventeen agents were used (nitroglycerin ointment (GTN), isosorbide mono & dinitrate, Botulinum toxin (Botox), diltiazem, nifedipine (Calcium channel blockers or CCBs), hydrocortisone, lignocaine, bran, minoxidil, indoramin, clove oil, L-arginine, sitz baths, sildenafil, "healer cream" and placebo) as well as Sitz baths, anal dilators and surgical sphincterotomy. GTN was found to be marginally but significantly better than placebo in healing anal fissure (48.9% vs. 35.5%, p < 0.0009), but late recurrence of fissure was common, in the range of 50% of those initially cured. Botox and CCBs were equivalent to GTN in efficacy with fewer adverse events. No medical therapy came close to the efficacy of surgical sphincterotomy, though none of the medical therapies in these RCTs were associated with the risk of incontinence.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Medical therapy for chronic anal fissure, currently consisting of topical glyceryl trinitrate, botulinum toxin injection or the topical calcium channel blockers nifedipine or diltiazem in acute and chronic fissure and fissure in children may be applied with a chance of cure that is marginally better than placebo. For chronic fissure in adults all medical therapies are far less effective than surgery. A few of the newer agents investigated show promise based only upon single studies (clove oil, sildenifil and a "healer cream") but lack comparison to more established medications.

Transcutaneous needle-free injection of botulinum toxin: a novel treatment of childhood constipation and anal fissure

PURPOSE

Constipation is a common problem in children, and when it becomes chronic fecal impaction, overflow soiling and megarectum may develop. Children with chronic idiopathic constipation (IC) may not respond to conventional treatments of laxatives, enemas, and toilet training. The aims of the study were to evaluate the long-term outcome of transcutaneous needle-free injection of botulinum toxin (TNFBT) into the external anal sphincter (EAS) and to assess the extent of the toxin penetration into the sphincter.

METHOD

Children were recruited if symptomatic with chronic constipation, soiling, painful defecation, and withholding behavior requiring disimpaction of stool and rectal biopsy under general anesthesia. A total dose of 200 U of botulinum toxin (BT) (Dysport; Ipsen Limited, Slough, United Kingdom) was injected transcutaneously into the EAS at 3 and 9-o'clock positions using J-tip needle-free syringes (National Medical Products Inc, Irvine, Calif). The depth and width of toxin penetration was assessed by endosonography. Outcome was measured by a validated symptom severity (SS) score questionnaire. The total SS score ranged between 0 (best) and 65 (worst). The outcome was compared with 31 children in a comparable historical control group at 3 and 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Sixteen children were recruited with median age of 6.11 (range, 3-14.85) years and median duration of symptoms of 3.9 years (1.6-11.5). On endosonography, the median depth and width of BT penetration was 8 (7-10) mm and 8 (6-10) mm, respectively. At 3-month follow-up, the median SS score improved in all children after TNFBT from 32.50 (5-57) to 7.50 (0-26) (Wilcoxon's P < .0001). There were significant improvements in symptoms of constipation, soiling, painful defecation, general health and behavior, and fecal impaction of rectum (P < .05). Anal fissures healed in all 4 children. The SS score in the control group improved from 33 (12-49) to 15 (0-40) (P < .0001). At 12-month follow-up, the improvement of SS score in TNFBT group was significantly more than the control group as follows: 4 (0-25) vs 15 (0-51), respectively (Mann-Whitney U P < .002). Three patients had a second TNFBT injection for relapsed symptoms. There were no complications. The transcutaneous needle-free injection of botulinum toxin eliminates the risk of intravascular injection or needlestick injury. The transcutaneous needle-free injection of botulinum toxin also has other therapeutic applications including an alternative therapy to biofeedback training for dyssynergia of the EAS, treatment of muscle limb spasticity in cerebral palsy, and cosmetic treatment of overactive facial muscles and wrinkles and hyperhydrosis.

CONCLUSION

Transcutaneous needle-free injection of botulinum toxin into the external anal sphincter is a novel and safe new treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation and anal fissure in children. A second injection may be required in 20% of patients.

Lateral internal sphincterotomy is superior to topical nitroglycerin for healing chronic anal fissure and does not compromise long-term fecal continence: six-year follow-up of a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial

PURPOSE

Although there is enthusiasm for nonoperative management of anal fissures, most trials have been of short duration (6-8 weeks) and long-term outcome is unknown. The purpose of this study was to assess long-term outcome in two cohorts of patients who had participated in a randomized, controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of topical nitroglycerin with internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissure.

METHODS

Between February 1997 and October 1998, 82 patients with chronic anal fissure were accrued and randomized to 0.25 percent nitroglycerin ointment t.i.d. or lateral internal sphincterotomy. In 2004, a telephone survey of trial participants was conducted to determine symptom recurrence, the need for further medical and/or surgical treatment, and patient satisfaction. Furthermore, patients were assessed for symptoms of fecal incontinence using the Jorge and Wexner Fecal Incontinence Score and the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaire.

RESULTS

Overall, 51 of the original 82 patients (62 percent, 27 nitroglycerin, 24 lateral internal sphincterotomy) completed our survey. Mean follow-up was 79 (+/-1) months. Sphincterotomy patients were less likely to have experienced fissure symptoms within the past year (0 vs. 41 percent; P = 0.0004) and were less likely to require subsequent surgical treatment (0 vs. 59 percent; P < 0.0001) than patients treated with nitroglycerin. Patients in the lateral internal sphincterotomy group were more likely to say that they were "very" or "moderately" satisfied with their treatment (100 vs. 56 percent; P = 0.04) and that they would choose the same treatment again (92 vs. 63 percent; P = 0.02) than patients in the nitroglycerin group. Finally, the fecal incontinence and fecal incontinence quality of life scores at six-year follow-up were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

After six years of follow-up, it seems that lateral internal sphincterotomy is a more durable treatment for chronic anal fissure compared with topical nitroglycerin therapy and does not compromise long-term fecal continence. Thus, sphincterotomy continues to be a good treatment for patients with chronic anal fissure.

Common anorectal problems

Children, just as adults, have a variety of common anorectal problems that can be quite bothersome. The presentation of these problems may be age-specific. Abscesses, fistulas, and fissures appear more commonly in infants and young children, whereas hemorrhoids and pilonidal disease are more common in teens and young adults. Fissures often can be treated medically but may require surgical treatment with lateral internal sphincterotomy. Abscesses and fistulas are common in infant males, especially robust infants who are breastfed. They may resolve with medical therapy but anal fistulotomy is not infrequently required. Hemorrhoids are rare in young children but may be an issue for teenagers. Acute symptomatic lesions may require excision if local measures cannot control the symptoms. Finally, pilonidal disease is a difficult problem for the patient and the surgeon. Persistently symptomatic lesions demand some type of surgical treatment but wound healing is poor in the intergluteal cleft region. More extensive procedures requiring the transfer of fasciocutaneous flaps may be necessary to provide definitive relief. Anorectal problems in infants and children are frequent and bothersome. Although most are not associated with tremendous morbidity, they can lead to much patient and parent anxiety as well as frequent medical consultation until the problem is successfully treated or resolves.

Non surgical therapy for anal fissure

BACKGROUND

Because of the disability associated with surgery for anal fissure and the risk of incontinence, medical alternatives for surgery have been sought. Most recently, pharmacologic methods that relax the anal smooth muscle, to accomplish reversibly what occurs in surgery, have been used to obtain fissure healing.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and morbidity of various medical therapies for anal fissure.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Search terms include "anal fissure randomized". Timing from 1966 to May 2006. Further details of the search below.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies in which participants were randomized to a non-surgical therapy for anal fissure. Comparison groups may include an operative procedure, an alternate medical therapy or placebo. Chronic fissure, acute fissure and fissure in children are included in the review. Atypical fissures associated with inflammatory bowel disease or cancer or anal infection are excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were abstracted from published reports and meeting abstracts, assessing method of randomization, blinding, "intention to treat" and drop-outs, therapies, supportive measures (applied to both groups), dosing and frequency and cross-overs. Dichotomous outcome measures included Non-healing of the fissure (a combination of persistence and recurrence), and Adverse events (including incontinence, headache, infection, anaphylaxis). Continuous outcome measures included measures of pain relief and anorectal manometry.

MAIN RESULTS

48 different comparisons of the ability of medical therapies to heal anal fissure have been reported in 53 RCTs. Eleven agents were used (nitroglycerin ointment (GTN), isosorbide dinitrate, Botulinum toxin (Botox), diltiazem, nifedipine (Calcium channel blockers or CCBs), hydrocortisone, lignocaine, bran, minoxidil, indoramin, and placebo) as well as anal dilators and surgical sphincterotomy.GTN was found to be marginally but significantly better than placebo in healing anal fissure (48.6% vs. 37%, p < 0.004), but late recurrence of fissure was common, in the range of 50% of those initially cured. Botox and CCBs were equivalent to GTN in efficacy with fewer adverse events. No medical therapy came close to the efficacy of surgical sphincterotomy, though none in these RCTs was associated with the risk of incontinence.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Medical therapy for chronic anal fissure, acute fissure and fissure in children may be applied with a chance of cure that is marginally better than placebo, and, for chronic fissure in adults, far less effective than surgery.

Audit of therapeutic interventions in inpatient children using two scores: are they evidence-based in developing countries?

Background

The evidence base of clinical interventions in paediatric hospitals of developing countries has not been formally assessed. We performed this study to determine the proportion of evidence-based therapeutic interventions in a paediatric referral hospital of a developing country

Methods

The medical records of 167 patients admitted in one-month period were revised. Primary diagnosis and primary therapeutic interventions were determined for each patient. A systematic search was performed to assess the level of evidence for each intervention. Therapeutic interventions were classified using the Ellis score and the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine Levels of Evidence

Results

Any dehydration due to diarrhoea (59 cases) and pneumonia (42 cases) were the most frequent diagnoses. Based on Ellis score, level I evidence supported the primary therapeutic intervention in 21%, level II in 73% and level III in 6% cases. Using the Oxford classification 16%, 8%, 1% and 75% therapeutic interventions corresponded to grades A, B, C, and D recommendations, respectively. Overall, according to Ellis score, 94% interventions were evidence based. However, out of the total, 75% interventions were based on expert opinion or basic sciences. Most children with mild to moderate dehydration (52 cases) were inappropriately treated with slow intravenous fluids, and most children with non-complicated community acquired pneumonia (42 cases) received intravenous antibiotics

Conclusions

Most interventions were inappropriate, despite the availability of effective therapy for several of them. Diarrhoeal dehydration and community acquired pneumonia were the most common diagnoses and were inappropriately managed. Existing effective interventions for dehydration and pneumonia need to be put into practice at referral hospitals of developing countries. For the remaining problems, there is the need to conduct appropriate clinical studies. Caution must be taken when assigning the level of evidence supporting therapeutic interventions, as commonly used classifications may be misleading

A systematic review of medical therapy for anal fissure

PURPOSE

This is a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials to assess the efficacy and morbidity of medical therapies for anal fissure.

METHODS

Medline and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and the Cochrane Colorectal Cancer Review Groups Controlled Trials Register were searched using the terms "anal fissure randomized" from 1966 to 2002. Studies in which participants were randomized to a nonsurgical therapy for anal fissure were the focus of this review. Comparison groups included an operative procedure, an alternate medical therapy, or placebo. Chronic fissure, acute fissure, and fissure in children were included in the review, however, atypical fissure associated with inflammatory bowel disease, cancer, or anal infection were excluded. Data were abstracted from published reports and meeting abstracts, assessing method of randomization, blinding, "intention to treat" and dropouts, therapies, supportive measures, dosing and frequency, and crossovers. Outcome measures included nonhealing of the fissure and adverse events.

RESULTS

Twenty one different comparisons of medical therapies to heal anal fissure have been reported in 31 trials, including 9 agents-glyceryl trinitrate, isosorbide dinitrate, botulinum toxin, diltiazem, nifedipine, hydrocortisone, lidocaine, bran, placebo-as well as anal dilators and surgical sphincterotomy. Glyceryl trinitrate was favored in the analysis over placebo (odds ratio = 0.55, 95 percent confidence interval, 0.41-0.74). After excluding two studies from analysis because of placebo response rates >2 standard deviations below the mean for all studies, the advantage of glyceryl trinitrate over placebo was no longer statistically significant (odds ratio = 0.78; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.56-1.08). Nifedipine and diltiazem did not differ from glyceryl trinitrate in their ability to cure fissure (0.66; 0.22-2.01). Botulinum toxin compared with placebo showed no significant efficacy (0.75; 0.32-1.77), and was also no better than glyceryl trinitrate (0.48; 0.21-1.10). Surgery was more effective than medical therapy in curing fissure (0.12; 0.07-0.22).

CONCLUSIONS

Medical therapy for chronic anal fissure, acute fissure, and fissure in children may be applied with a chance of cure that is only marginally better than placebo, and for chronic fissure, far less effective than surgery.

Non surgical therapy for anal fissure

BACKGROUND

Because of the disability associated with surgery for anal fissure and the risk of incontinence, medical alternatives for surgery have been sought. Most recently, pharmacologic methods that relax the anal smooth muscle, to accomplish reversibly what occurs in surgery, have been used to obtain fissure healing.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and morbidity of various medical therapies for anal fissure.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Search terms include "anal fissure randomized".

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies in which participants were randomized to a non-surgical therapy for anal fissure. Comparison groups may include an operative procedure, an alternate medical therapy or placebo. Chronic fissure, acute fissure and fissure in children are included in the review. Atypical fissures associated with inflammatory bowel disease or cancer or anal infection are excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were abstracted from published reports and meeting abstracts, assessing method of randomization, blinding, "intention to treat" and drop-outs, therapies, supportive measures (applied to both groups), dosing and frequency and cross-overs. Dichotomous outcome measures included Non-healing of the fissure (a combination of persistence and recurrence), and Adverse events (including incontinence, headache, infection, anaphylaxis). Continuous outcome measures included measures of pain relief and anorectal manometry.

MAIN RESULTS

21 different comparisons of the ability of medical therapies to heal anal fissure have been reported in 31 RCTs. Nine agents were used (nitroglycerin ointment (GTN), isosorbide dinitrate, Botulinum toxin (Botox), diltiazem, nifedipine (Calcium channel blockers or Cachablos), hydrocortisone, lignocaine, bran, placebo) as well as anal dilators and surgical sphincterotomy. When two studies are excluded from analysis due to quality concerns, the significance disappears in the three main analyses: GTN vs. placebo group (0.78; 0.56-1.08), in children (0.96; 0.48-1.92) and adults (0.73; 0.50-1.07). That is, GTN was, in this modified analysis, not significantly better than placebo in curing anal fissure. Cachablos were not tested against placebo, but in a comparison to GTN, Cachablo was equivalent in its ability to cure fissure (odds ratio 0.66; 0.22-2.01). Botox, in a meta-analysis of two studies compared to placebo, showed no significant advantage in efficacy (0.75; 0.32-1.77), and in a comparison to GTN analyzing two studies, was also not significantly better than GTN (0.48; 0.21-1.10).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Medical therapy for chronic anal fissure, acute fissure and fissure in children may be applied with a chance of cure that is only marginally better than placebo, and, for chronic fissure in adults, far less effective than surgery.