Efficacy of intra-articular bevacizumab for relapsing diffuse-type giant cell tumour

Tenosynovial giant cell tumors (TGCT): molecular biology, drug targets and non-surgical pharmacological approaches

INTRODUCTION

Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is a mono-articular, benign or locally aggressive and often debilitating neoplasm. Systemic therapies are becoming part of the multimodal armamentarium when surgery alone will not confer improvements. Since TGCT is characterized by colony-stimulating factor-1 (CSF1) rearrangements, the most studied molecular pathway is the CSF1 and CSF1 receptor (CSF1R) axis. Inhibiting CSF1-CSF1R interaction often yields considerable radiological and clinical responses; however, adverse events may cause treatment discontinuation because of an unfavorable risk-benefit ratio in benign disease. Only Pexidartinib is approved by the US FDA; however, the European Medicines Agency has not approved it due to uncertainties on the risk-benefit ratio. Thus, there is a need for safer and effective therapies.

AREAS COVERED

Light is shed on disease mechanisms and potential drug targets. The safety and efficacy of different systemic therapies are evaluated.

EXPERT OPINION

The CSF1-CSF1R axis is the principal drug target; however, the effect of CSF1R inhibition on angiogenesis and the role of macrophages, which are essential in the postoperative course, needs further elucidation. Systemic therapies have a promising role in treating mainly diffuse-type, TGCT patients who are not expected to clinically improve from surgery. Future drug development should focus on targeting neoplastic TGCT cells.

Clinical comparison of tenosynovial giant cell tumors, synovial chondromatosis, and synovial sarcoma: analysis and report of 53 cases

Background

Tenosynovial giant cell tumors (TGCTs), synovial chondromatosis (SC), and synovial sarcoma (SS) exhibit similarities in clinical features and histochemical characteristics, and differential diagnosis remains challenging in clinical practice.

Methods

Data were collected from the pathology database of Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital regarding patients who underwent surgery from 2010 to 2019 with histologically confirmed TGCTs, SC, and SS. Demographic and clinicopathological data of these patients were reviewed. Immunohistochemistry staining of 14 different markers was performed. Correlation analyses of the prognoses were evaluated.

Results

A total of 26 patients with TGCTs (8 diffuse TGCTs and 18 localized TGCTs), 16 with SC, and 11 with SS were identified. Pain was the main symptom of patients with both TGCTs and SC, while a palpable mass was the most common symptom for patients with SS. In addition to clinical features, we identified vital risk factors for disease recurrence. The mean follow-up periods were 51, 39, and 14 months for TGCTs, SC, and SS, respectively. Younger patients with diffuse TGCTs or patients with a higher neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) displayed a significantly higher frequency of recurrence. We also plotted receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for age and NLR. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated and demonstrated the ability to distinguish recurrent from nonrecurrent cases. In addition, higher CD163 expression was linked to recurrent diffuse TGCT cases.

Conclusions

These data indicated possible characteristics of different aspects of TGCTs, SC, and SS. Further clarification and understanding of these factors will help with differential clinical diagnosis and recurrent risk assessment.

Limiting angiogenesis to modulate scar formation

Angiogenesis, the process of new blood vessel formation from existing blood vessels, is a key aspect of virtually every repair process. During wound healing an extensive, but immature and leaky vascular plexus forms which is subsequently reduced by regression of non-functional vessels. More recent studies indicate that uncontrolled vessel growth or impaired vessel regression as a consequence of an excessive inflammatory response can impair wound healing, resulting in scarring and dysfunction. However, in order to elucidate targetable factors to promote functional tissue regeneration we need to understand the molecular and cellular underpinnings of physiological angiogenesis, ranging from induction to resolution of blood vessels. Especially for avascular tissues (e.g. cornea, tendon, ligament, cartilage, etc.), limiting rather than boosting vessel growth during wound repair potentially is beneficial to restore full tissue function and may result in favourable long-term healing outcomes.

Villonodular Synovitis of the Subtalar Joint: A Case Report

Introduction:

Villonodular synovitis (SVN) is a rare benign pseudotumoral proliferation of the synovial joint, of unknown etiology. In general, it reaches the big joints, especially the knee. Localization at the subtalar level is extremely rare, with only a few cases published in the literature.

Case Report:

We report the case of an SVN of the subtalar in a 60-year-old patient without particular histories, who consulted for a swelling of the external border of the right foot evolving for 2 years. Biology, as well as the standard radiographs, was without anomalies. The diagnosis was evoked on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and confirmed by surgical biopsy and excision. The operative follow-up was simple with no recurrence after 3 years.

Conclusion:

SVN of the subtalar is rare. Surgical treatment is based mainly on synovectomy, and the prognosis depends mainly on the osteocartilaginous lesion and the quality of excision.

Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis: A Comprehensive Review and Proposed Treatment Algorithm

Evidence now exists suggesting a neoplastic origin for pigmented villonodular synovitis, including a thorough description of the translocations involved. Arthroscopic excision for localized pigmented villonodular synovitis allows for both minimal recurrence and morbidity when compared with open excision; however, open excision still plays an important role in treating posterior compartment nodules. The optimal surgical treatment for diffuse pigmented villonodular synovitis is still a matter for debate, with combined anterior arthroscopic and open posterior excision being considered the preferred method. Radiation therapy has re-emerged as an additional treatment method for pigmented villonodular synovitis; however, the potential for serious toxicity makes it a questionable option, especially for such a benign condition. Small molecule and monoclonal antibody targeted therapies are being investigated as novel treatment methods for pigmented villonodular synovitis, with promising results.

Current Systemic Treatment Options for Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor/Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis: Targeting the CSF1/CSF1R Axis

OPINION STATEMENT

Adequate surgical resection remains the treatment of choice for tenosyovial giant cell tumor (TGCT). However, diffuse type TGCT (D-TGCT) is more difficult to resect and has a higher rate of recurrence (up to 50 %), which is often multiple. D-TGCT is rarely lethal and only rare cases of metastases have been described. Nevertheless, patients might have a significant decline in their quality of life due to multiple operations, which may sometimes result in a partial loss of function of the affected joint and may also be associated with perioperative morbidity and secondary arthrosis. As of today, no systemic treatment is approved for this rare disease. The aims of systemic therapy in the context of a non-lethal tumor are to reduce surgical morbidity and to preserve function and patient quality of life. Because TGCT is associated with characteristic cytogenetic abnormalities resulting in the overexpression of CSF1, systemic therapies targeting the CSF1/CSF1R axis (imatinib, nilotinib, emactuzumab, and PLX3397) have been tested in patients with locally advanced or relapsed D-TGCT. The more recent and more specific CSF1R inhibitors have shown a very interesting clinical activity with acceptable toxicity in early phase trials. These results will need to be confirmed in larger, ideally randomized, trials. But the high rate of clinical and functional improvement seen in some patients with advanced D-TGCT, often after multiple operations, suggests that these inhibitors will likely have a role in the management of patients with an inoperable disease; the definition of "inoperable TGCT" still requires refinement to reach a consensus. Another point that will need to be addressed is that of "the optimal duration of therapy" for these patients. Indeed, we and others have observed often prolonged clinical benefit and symptomatic relief even after treatment was stopped, with both monoclonal antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Responses were observed very early on with emactuzumab and PLX3397, and patients experienced significant symptom improvement within a few weeks of starting therapy (2-4 weeks). Another possible application of CSF1R inhibitors could be used either as a preoperative or postoperative therapy for patients with operable TGCT. However, we currently lack sufficient follow-up to adequately address these questions which will each require specific trial designs. Overall, the striking clinical activity of CSF1R specific inhibitors in TGCT has created great enthusiasm among clinicians, and further development of these agents is clearly medically needed. Nevertheless, further investigations are necessary to validate those treatments and assess how to best incorporate them among other treatment modalities into the overall therapeutic strategy for a given patient.

Targeting VEGF and Its Receptors for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis and Associated Pain

Increased vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels are associated with osteoarthritis (OA) progression. Indeed, VEGF appears to be involved in OA-specific pathologies including cartilage degeneration, osteophyte formation, subchondral bone cysts and sclerosis, synovitis, and pain. Moreover, a wide range of studies suggest that inhibition of VEGF signaling reduces OA progression. This review highlights both the potential significance of VEGF in OA pathology and pain, as well as potential benefits of inhibition of VEGF and its receptors as an OA treatment. With the emergence of the clinical use of anti-VEGF therapy outside of OA, both as high-dose systemic treatments and low-dose local treatments, these particular therapies are now more widely understood. Currently, there is no established disease-modifying drug available for patients with OA, which warrants continued study of the inhibition of VEGF signaling in OA, as stand-alone or adjuvant therapy. © 2016 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Current Systemic Treatment Options for Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor/Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis: Targeting the CSF1/CSF1R Axis

OPINION STATEMENT

Adequate surgical resection remains the treatment of choice for tenosyovial giant cell tumor (TGCT). However, diffuse type TGCT (D-TGCT) is more difficult to resect and has a higher rate of recurrence (up to 50 %), which is often multiple. D-TGCT is rarely lethal and only rare cases of metastases have been described. Nevertheless, patients might have a significant decline in their quality of life due to multiple operations, which may sometimes result in a partial loss of function of the affected joint and may also be associated with perioperative morbidity and secondary arthrosis. As of today, no systemic treatment is approved for this rare disease. The aims of systemic therapy in the context of a non-lethal tumor are to reduce surgical morbidity and to preserve function and patient quality of life. Because TGCT is associated with characteristic cytogenetic abnormalities resulting in the overexpression of CSF1, systemic therapies targeting the CSF1/CSF1R axis (imatinib, nilotinib, emactuzumab, and PLX3397) have been tested in patients with locally advanced or relapsed D-TGCT. The more recent and more specific CSF1R inhibitors have shown a very interesting clinical activity with acceptable toxicity in early phase trials. These results will need to be confirmed in larger, ideally randomized, trials. But the high rate of clinical and functional improvement seen in some patients with advanced D-TGCT, often after multiple operations, suggests that these inhibitors will likely have a role in the management of patients with an inoperable disease; the definition of "inoperable TGCT" still requires refinement to reach a consensus. Another point that will need to be addressed is that of "the optimal duration of therapy" for these patients. Indeed, we and others have observed often prolonged clinical benefit and symptomatic relief even after treatment was stopped, with both monoclonal antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Responses were observed very early on with emactuzumab and PLX3397, and patients experienced significant symptom improvement within a few weeks of starting therapy (2-4 weeks). Another possible application of CSF1R inhibitors could be used either as a preoperative or postoperative therapy for patients with operable TGCT. However, we currently lack sufficient follow-up to adequately address these questions which will each require specific trial designs. Overall, the striking clinical activity of CSF1R specific inhibitors in TGCT has created great enthusiasm among clinicians, and further development of these agents is clearly medically needed. Nevertheless, further investigations are necessary to validate those treatments and assess how to best incorporate them among other treatment modalities into the overall therapeutic strategy for a given patient.