Longitudinal analysis of ANA in the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) Inception Cohort

Genetic burden of lupus increases the risk of transition from normal to preclinical autoimmune conditions via antinuclear antibody development

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the association between the genetic burden of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and the loss of tolerance to self-nuclear antigens in the preclinical stage.

METHODS

We analysed genetic data from 349 Korean individuals who tested positive for autoantibodies in the preclinical stage, along with 33,596 healthy controls and 2057 patients with SLE. Genome-wide and pathway-specific polygenic risk scores (PRSs) of SLE were calculated based on 180 known non-human leukocyte antigen (non-HLA) SLE loci, HLA-DRB1 classical alleles, and predefined immune-related pathways to subsequently correlate with clinical phenotypes, particularly the presence of antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) at various titre thresholds.

RESULTS

Individuals with preclinical autoimmune conditions exhibited significantly higher SLE PRSs than healthy controls (P = 2.99 × 10-5), with a significantly upward trend between ANA titres and PRS (P = 1.12 × 10-3). Stratification analysis revealed that preclinical-stage individuals with PRSs exceeding the means of age- and sex-matched PRSs among patients with SLE were at a significantly higher risk of ANA development (odds ratio = 2.25; P = 8.12 × 10-3 at a dilution factor of 1:80). Pathway-specific PRS analysis identified the significant enrichment of SLE-risk effects in nine pathways, such as signalling related to reactive oxygen species production, T cell receptor, B cell receptor, and cytokines, in ANA-positive preclinical individuals (Padjusted < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings illustrate that the genetic burden of SLE may lead to a crucial transition from normal to preclinical autoimmune conditions prior to the pathogenic stage by increasing the susceptibility to and levels of ANAs.

Different patterns of longitudinal changes in antinuclear antibodies titers in children with systemic lupus erythematosus and Sjögren's syndrome

OBJECTIVE

to investigate the trend of autoantibody titers during a 2-year follow-up in pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus (pSLE) and pediatric Sjögren's syndrome (pSS).

METHODS

Autoantibodies testing was performed every 3-4 months during 2 years from disease onset in a cohort of children with pSLE and pSS.

RESULTS

We enrolled 21 children with pSLE and 22 children with pSS. All pSLE patients at 2 years showed ANA titers significantly lower compared to disease onset. Eleven patients (73%) were still ANA positive at 2 years, while 4 (26%) became ANA negative. At diagnosis, 12 (80%) patients showed a homogeneous pattern, while 3 (20%) patients showed a speckled pattern. The latter remained ANA positive with the same pattern; only 2 patients with a homogenous pattern converted to speckled, 4 patients with a homogeneous pattern became ANA negative. ANA negative pSLE patients showed lower levels of interferon score compared to ANA positive patients. Anti-dsDNA titers declined equally in the two groups. All patients with pSS, at disease onset, were ANA and anti-Ro positive and 14 (66%) were anti-La positive. After 2 years of follow-up, 100% remained ANA positive but showed significant lower titers. During follow-up anti-Ro and anti-La titers remained stable.

CONCLUSION

different patterns in changes of ANA and ENA titers in pSLE and pSS were shown. At 2 years of follow-up, all pSLE patients had a lower ANA titer and 26% became negative; however, all pSS patients remained both ANA and ENA positive. This evidence may be due to different pathogenetic pathways in SLE and pSS.

Comparison of cell type and disease subset chromatin modifications in SLE

BACKGROUND

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease with protean manifestations. There is little understanding of why some organs are specifically impacted in patients and the mechanisms of disease persistence remain unclear. While much work has been done characterizing the DNA methylation status in SLE, there is less information on histone modifications, a more dynamic epigenetic feature. This study identifies two histone marks of activation and the binding of p300 genome-wide in three cell types and three clinical subsets to better understand cell-specific effects and differences across clinical subsets.

RESULTS

We examined 20 patients with SLE and 8 controls and found that individual chromatin marks varied considerably across T cells, B cells, and monocytes. When pathways were examined, there was far more concordance with conservation of TNF, IL-2/STAT5, and KRAS pathways across multiple cell types and ChIP data sets. Patients with cutaneous lupus and lupus nephritis generally had less dramatically altered chromatin than the general SLE group. Signals also demonstrated significant overlap with GWAS signals in a manner that did not implicate one cell type more than the others.

CONCLUSIONS

The pathways identified by altered histone modifications and p300 binding are pathways known to be important from RNA expression studies and recognized pathogenic mechanisms of disease. NFκB and classical inflammatory pathways were strongly associated with increased peak heights across all cell types but were the highest-ranking pathway for all three antibodies in monocytes according to fgsea analysis. IL-6 Jak/STAT3 signaling was the most significant pathway association in T cells marked by H3K27ac change. Therefore, each cell type experiences the disease process distinctly although in all cases there was a strong theme of classical inflammatory pathways. Importantly, this NFκB pathway, so strongly implicated in the patients with generalized SLE, was much less impacted in monocytes when cutaneous lupus was compared to the general SLE cohort and also less impacted in lupus nephritis compared to general SLE. These studies define important cell type differences and emphasize the breadth of the inflammatory effects in SLE.

Longitudinal antinuclear antibody titers in systemic lupus erythematosus and other rheumatic diseases

Introduction

Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) are a key feature of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and marker of subclinical autoimmunity. Little is known about longitudinal ANA titers in individuals from the general population or in predicting clinical disease course in persons with rheumatic diseases.

Methods

We performed an exploratory analysis from an academic health system between 1999 and 2020 to assess intra-individual variation in ANAs longitudinally in persons with SLE, other ANA-associated rheumatic diseases, and ANA+ controls without rheumatic disease.

Results

Persons with SLE had a higher odds of positive ANA compared to those with other ANA-associated rheumatic diseases [OR 2.10, 95% CI (1.82, 2.43)] controlling for time and demographics (age, sex, race, ethnicity). Compared to ANA+ controls, the ANA titer strength was significantly higher for both the ANA-associated rheumatic disease (0.33 log units higher) and SLE groups (0.42 log units higher) controlling for demographics and time (p < 0.001 for both). Over time from the first positive ANA, titer strength significantly decreased for all three groups, with average monthly decreases ranging between 0.001 to 0.004 log titer units (p ≤ 0.001 for all).

Conclusion

Based on this analysis of electronic health data spanning two decades, ANA titers may be more dynamic than previously accepted in patients with SLE and ANA-associated rheumatic diseases, with average titers tending to be higher in early disease and decreasing over time.

Mapping theme evolution and identifying hotspots in biomarkers of systemic lupus erythematosus based on global research

Objective: To perform a bibliometric analysis in the field of biomarkers for systemic lupus erythematosus. Methods: Publications were from Web of Science. Microsoft Excel, VOSviewer, Science Mapping Analysis software Tool, CiteSpace and Tableau were used for analysis. Results: A total of 1112 publications were identified; 1503 institutions from 69 countries contributed, with the highest outputs from China and Karolinska University Hospital. Petri had a tremendous impact. Academic collaborations were localized. Lupus and Arthritis & Rheumatology were the top two journals in terms of publications and citations. Lymphocyte, autoantibody, type I interferon, genetic polymorphisms and urinary biomarkers have been high-frequency themes. Conclusion: Global collaboration needs to be further strengthened. Immune cell, cytokine and gene-level research as a whole and noninvasive tests are the future trends.

Redefining serological diagnostics with immunoaffinity proteomics

Serological diagnostics is generally defined as the detection of specific human immunoglobulins developed against viral, bacterial, or parasitic diseases. Serological tests facilitate the detection of past infections, evaluate immune status, and provide prognostic information. Serological assays were traditionally implemented as indirect immunoassays, and their design has not changed for decades. The advantages of straightforward setup and manufacturing, analytical sensitivity and specificity, affordability, and high-throughput measurements were accompanied by limitations such as semi-quantitative measurements, lack of universal reference standards, potential cross-reactivity, and challenges with multiplexing the complete panel of human immunoglobulin isotypes and subclasses. Redesign of conventional serological tests to include multiplex quantification of immunoglobulin isotypes and subclasses, utilize universal reference standards, and minimize cross-reactivity and non-specific binding will facilitate the development of assays with higher diagnostic specificity. Improved serological assays with higher diagnostic specificity will enable screenings of asymptomatic populations and may provide earlier detection of infectious diseases, autoimmune disorders, and cancer. In this review, we present the major clinical needs for serological diagnostics, overview conventional immunoassay detection techniques, present the emerging immunoassay detection technologies, and discuss in detail the advantages and limitations of mass spectrometry and immunoaffinity proteomics for serological diagnostics. Finally, we explore the design of novel immunoaffinity-proteomic assays to evaluate cell-mediated immunity and advance the sequencing of clinically relevant immunoglobulins.

Serological and clinical associations of autoantibodies in Chinese patients with new-onset systemic lupus erythematosus

To study the clinical significance of autoantibodies in Chinese patients with new-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), we enrolled 526 new-onset patients who met the 1997 Updated American College of Rheumatology SLE Classification Criteria for a retrospective cohort study. Chi-square test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used to detect the relationship of autoantibodies with clinical manifestations and serological results respectively. Our results demonstrated that the positive rate of anti-ribosomal P protein (anti-P) antibody in female patients was higher than that in male patients (41.2% vs. 22%, P = 0.008). Patients with anti-SSB (43.95 ± 73.12 vs. 40.92 ± 75.75, P = 0.004; 63.93 ± 103.56 vs. 55.06 ± 120.84, P = 0.008 respectively) antibodies had higher levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST), whereas those with anti-P antibody (28.90 ± 25.70 vs. 50.08 ± 93.00, P = 0.014; 38.51 ± 48.19 vs. 69.95 ± 142.67, P = 0.047, respectively) had lower levels of them. Anti-dsDNA antibody (P = 0.021) was associated with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The patients with anti-Ro60 (P = 0.044), anti-P (P = 0.012) and anti-dsDNA (P = 0.013) antibodies were less likely to develop Interstitial lung disease. Anti-SmRNP antibody was correlated to lower prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms (P = 0.037), and patients with anti-centromere antibody (ACA) were more likely to develop serositis (P = 0.016).We identified five clusters of SLE-related autoantibodies, confirmed previously reported associations of autoantibodies, and discovered new associations.

Autoantibodies testing in autoimmunity: Diagnostic, prognostic and classification value

Diagnosis of autoimmune diseases is in most cases challenging for clinicians as there is not a single specific laboratory or histological marker to diagnose or exclude the presence of the conditions. This review focused on the current knowledge of the role of autoantibodies' testing in various diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, antiphospholipid syndrome, undifferentiated connective tissues disease, primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. Similarly, the prognostic and diagnostic values of autoantibodies testing in patients with interstitial lung disease have been reviewed. In-depth research on the molecular action of these autoantibodies on immune regulation and diseases pathogenesis has been explored beyond their correlation with disease phenotypes, highlighting the impact of autoantibodies targeting on disease outcomes and etiopathogenesis.

[Lupus nephritis: from diagnosis to treatment]

Renal involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), so-called lupus nephritis (LN), is one of the most frequent organ manifestations with an incidence of approximately 40-60%. It is not uncommon for renal involvement to be the initial manifestation of SLE or to occur in the first 5-10 years after diagnosis of SLE. Urinalysis is useful in screening for the presence of LN, demonstrating proteinuria or active sediment with acanthocytes. Histologic confirmation of LN, and thus the LN class present, is currently the gold standard for confirming the diagnosis. In addition, knowledge of the LN class is a relevant component of adequate treatment planning in SLE patients with LN. In particular, early diagnosis and rapid response to therapy are of prognostic importance for the preservation of renal function as well as morbidity and mortality of the mostly young patients at the time of initial diagnosis. Thus, the focus of therapy is to achieve complete remission, as well as to avoid active disease phases. Due to a complex pathogenesis and at the same time a very heterogeneous clinical presentation, with six different histological classes of LN, there are different therapeutic targets. This in turn results in a significant expansion of the study landscape in the field of LN with an increasing understanding of the signaling pathways and influencing factors, and fortunately in a growing armamentarium of available targeted therapy options. Simultaneously, new insights into drug therapy to inhibit progression of chronic renal disease are opening up supportive therapy options that can further improve preservation of renal function.

Duration biased distribution of clinical and immunological phenotypes in active SLE

Introduction

This study is aimed to map the clinical and immunological features of active lupus patients with different disease duration.

Methods

For clinical phenotype analysis, we enriched eligible medical records with active SLE (SLEDAI-2k≥8) from the Renji Lupus registry, a single-center database of hospitalized SLE patients with standard care, which covered national-wide patients. Patients with repeated hospitalization records in this enrichment were analyzed longitudinally as validation for the cross-sectional study above.

Results

We enriched a total of 1313 eligible records on active SLE (SLEDAI-2k≥8) for cross-sectional analysis. Stratified into four groups by a 5-year interval of disease duration, these active SLE patients showed a significantly shifting clinical phenotype along with the duration (ascending nephritis, pulmonary hypertension and descending fever, cutaneous symptoms, arthritis, and neuropsychiatric manifestations), especially in stratifications with disease onset age ≤ 45 years old. A longitudinal analysis of 55 patients with repeated hospitalizations for active lupus showed a similar trend. In the cross-sectional study of 222 records with full information on serology and lymphocyte subsets, peripheral B cell proportion, anti-dsDNA antibody, and serum IgG/IgM negatively correlated with duration, while CD8+ T cell proportion was positively correlated (P values, 0.029-4.8×10^-17), which were supported by the sensitivity analysis in patient subgroups according to disease onset age and recent treatment. Multivariate linear regression identified duration as the only significant associator with both B cell and CD8+ T cell proportion (P values, 8.9×10^-8 and 7.6×10^-5, respectively). These duration biased immune phenotypes were highly consistent with the longitudinal observation in 14 patients with repeated hospitalizations.

Conclusions

Both clinical and immunological features of active SLE are significantly duration biased distributed, which merits further investigations in the evolution of SLE pathogenesis.

Anti-Phospholipid Antibodies and Coronavirus Disease 2019: Vaccination Does Not Trigger Early Autoantibody Production in Healthcare Workers

A molecular mimicry between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and human proteins supports the possibility that autoimmunity takes place during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) contributing to tissue damage. For example, anti-phospholipid antibodies (aPL) have been reported in COVID-19 as a result of such mimicry and thought to contribute to the immunothrombosis characteristic of the disease. Consistently, active immunization with the virus spike protein may elicit the production of cross-reactive autoantibodies, including aPL. We prospectively looked at the aPL production in healthcare workers vaccinated with RNA- (BNT162b2, n. 100) or adenovirus-based vaccines (ChAdOx1, n. 50). Anti-cardiolipin, anti-beta2 glycoprotein I, anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgA, and IgM before and after vaccination were investigated. Anti-platelet factor 4 immunoglobulins were also investigated as autoantibodies associated with COVID-19 vaccination. Additional organ (anti-thyroid) and non-organ (anti-nuclear) autoantibodies and IgG against human proteome were tested as further post-vaccination autoimmunity markers. The antibodies were tested one or three months after the first injection of ChAdOx1 and BNT162b2, respectively; a 12-month clinical follow-up was also performed. Vaccination occasionally induced low titers of aPL and other autoantibodies but did not affect the titer of pre-existing autoantibodies. No significant reactivities against a microarray of approximately 20,000 human proteins were found in a subgroup of ChAdOx1-vaccinees. Consistently, we did not record any clinical manifestation theoretically associated with an underlying autoimmune disorder. The data obtained after the vaccination (two doses for the RNA-based and one dose for the adenovirus-based vaccines), and the clinical follow-up are not supporting the occurrence of an early autoimmune response in this cohort of healthcare workers.