Islet autoantibody status in a multi-ethnic UK clinic cohort of children presenting with diabetes

The relationship between GAD65 autoantibody and the risk of T1DM onset

Objectives

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is a well-known autoimmune disease, characterized by β-cell destruction in pancreas islet cells, which results insulin deficiency and subsequent hyperglycemic sequelae. While there is screening for type 2 DM that leads to better glycemic control and outcome, the majority of T1DM patients are diagnosed when much of the pancreatic cells and their function are disturbed. The aim of this article is to present an overview of the effective factors in the positivity of Glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody )GADA( and identifying the high-risk individuals for T1DM.

Methods

We searched English literature available at National Library of Medicine via PubMed, and Google Scholar through December 2020. Finally, 79 papers have been included in the study. Studies were summarized based on the number of positive autoantibodies and onset of T1DM over time and GADA correlation with different variables.

Conclusions

GADA is an easy marker to measure that can be detected many months prior to the clinical presentation and remains positive even after early childhood.

Autoantibody-Negative Type 1 Diabetes: A Neglected Subtype

Up to 15% of individuals with a clinical phenotype of type 1 diabetes (T1D) do not have evidence of seropositivity for pancreatic islet autoantibodies. On this basis, they are classified as nonimmune or idiopathic, and remain an understudied population, as they are excluded from T1D immunomodulatory trials. Our limited understanding of the disease aetiopathogenesis in autoantibody-negative T1D hinders our ability to improve diagnostic pathways and discover novel therapeutic agents; particularly as we progress towards an era of precision medicine. This review summarises the current understanding and challenges in studying autoantibody-negative T1D. We review the literature regarding T1D classification, and the role of autoimmunity and defects in the immunogenic pathway that may distinguish autoantibody-positive and -negative T1D.

Sensitive detection of multiple islet autoantibodies in type 1 diabetes using small sample volumes by agglutination-PCR

Islet autoantibodies are predominantly measured by radioassay to facilitate risk assessment and diagnosis of type 1 diabetes. However, the reliance on radioactive components, large sample volumes and limited throughput renders radioassay testing costly and challenging. We developed a multiplex analysis platform based on antibody detection by agglutination-PCR (ADAP) for the sample-sparing measurement of GAD, IA-2 and insulin autoantibodies/antibodies in 1 μL serum. The assay was developed and validated in 7 distinct cohorts (n = 858) with the majority of the cohorts blinded prior to analysis. Measurements from the ADAP assay were compared to radioassay to determine correlation, concordance, agreement, clinical sensitivity and specificity. The average overall agreement between ADAP and radioassay was above 91%. The average clinical sensitivity and specificity were 96% and 97%. In the IASP 2018 workshop, ADAP achieved the highest sensitivity of all assays tested at 95% specificity (AS95) rating for GAD and IA-2 autoantibodies and top-tier performance for insulin autoantibodies. Furthermore, ADAP correctly identified 95% high-risk individuals with two or more autoantibodies by radioassay amongst 39 relatives of T1D patients tested. In conclusion, the new ADAP assay can reliably detect the three cardinal islet autoantibodies/antibodies in 1μL serum with high sensitivity. This novel assay may improve pediatric testing compliance and facilitate easier community-wide screening for islet autoantibodies.

Relationship between islet autoantibody status and the clinical characteristics of children and adults with incident type 1 diabetes in a UK cohort

OBJECTIVES

To describe the characteristics of children and adults with incident type 1 diabetes in contemporary, multiethnic UK, focusing on differences between the islet autoantibody negative and positive.

DESIGN

Observational cohort study.

SETTING

146 mainly secondary care centres across England and Wales.

PARTICIPANTS

3312 people aged ≥5 years were recruited within 6 months of a clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes via the National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Network. 3021 were of white European ethnicity and 291 (9%) were non-white. There was a small male predominance (57%). Young people <17 years comprised 59%.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Autoantibody status and characteristics at presentation.

RESULTS

The majority presented with classical osmotic symptoms, weight loss and fatigue. Ketoacidosis was common (42%), especially in adults, and irrespective of ethnicity. 35% were overweight or obese. Of the 1778 participants who donated a blood sample, 85% were positive for one or more autoantibodies against glutamate decarboxylase, islet antigen-2 and zinc transporter 8. Presenting symptoms were similar in the autoantibody-positive and autoantibody-negative participants, as was the frequency of ketoacidosis (43%vs40%, P=0.3). Autoantibody positivity was less common with increasing age (P=0.0001), in males compared with females (82%vs90%, P<0.0001) and in people of non-white compared with white ethnicity (73%vs86%, P<0.0001). Body mass index was higher in autoantibody-negative adults than autoantibody-positive adults (median, IQR 25.5, 23.1-29.2vs23.9, 21.4-26.7 kg/m²; P=0.0001). Autoantibody-negative participants were more likely to have a parent with diabetes (28%vs16%, P<0.0001) and less likely to have another autoimmune disease (4%vs8%, P=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Most people assigned a diagnosis of type 1 diabetes presented with classical clinical features and islet autoantibodies. Although indistinguishable at an individual level, autoantibody-negative participants as a group demonstrated features more typically associated with other diabetes subtypes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN66496918; Pre-results.

Rationale and protocol for the After Diabetes Diagnosis REsearch Support System (ADDRESS): an incident and high risk type 1 diabetes UK cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Type 1 diabetes is heterogeneous in its presentation and progression. Variations in clinical presentation between children and adults, and with ethnic group warrant further study in the UK to improve understanding of this heterogeneity. Early interventions to limit beta cell damage in type 1 diabetes are undergoing evaluation, but recruitment is challenging. The protocol presented describes recruitment of people with clinician-assigned, new-onset type 1 diabetes to understand the variation in their manner of clinical presentation, to facilitate recruitment into intervention studies and to create an open-access resource of data and biological samples for future type 1 diabetes research.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Using the National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Network, patients >5 years of age diagnosed clinically with type 1 diabetes (and their siblings) are recruited within 6 months of diagnosis. Participants agree to have their clinical, laboratory and demographic data stored on a secure database, for their clinical progress to be monitored using information held by NHS Digital, and to be contacted about additional research, in particular immunotherapy and other interventions. An optional blood sample is taken for islet autoantibody measurement and storage of blood and DNA for future analyses. Data will be analysed statistically to describe the presentation of incident type 1 diabetes in a contemporary UK population.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval was obtained from the independent NHS Research Ethics Service. Results will be presented at national and international meetings and submitted for publication to peer-reviewed journals.