NICE guideline review: neonatal infection: antibiotics for prevention and treatment (NG195)

A Saudi Hospital's Experience in the Management of Well-Appearing Neonates at Increased Risk for Early-Onset Bacterial Sepsis

BACKGROUND

Early-onset neonatal bacterial sepsis (EOS) is a serious medical condition where pathogenic bacterial species are isolated from the blood of newborns within the first 72 hours of life. Neonatal healthcare providers face challenges in managing well-appearing newborns born at 35 weeks gestational age or more who are at an increased risk of developing EOS. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has recommended three approaches for managing EOS. One of these approaches includes enhanced observation to observe the progression of the newborn's clinical condition within the first 48 hours after birth. The AAP recommends that birth centers should adopt institutional approaches that are tailored to their specific local resources and structures. It recommends that the chosen approach is evaluated to identify infrequent negative outcomes and to confirm its effectiveness.

AIMS

To report our experience in managing EOS in newborns born at 35 weeks gestation or later with an increased risk for EOS.

METHODS

This was a review of electronic medical records from the past five years. We included a sample of newborns born at or after 35 weeks gestational age who were at increased risk of EOS and appeared to be healthy. We implemented universal antenatal culture-based screening for Group B streptococcus (GBS). We followed the recommendations of the AAP in 2012 to manage these newborns. We performed a complete blood count (CBC) with differential and C-reactive protein (CRP) tests to predict EOS. We also considered the newborns symptomatic if they displayed any clinical signs of EOS.

RESULTS

A total of 806 newborns were included in the study, out of which 27 (3.3%) of them had symptoms of EOS, while the remaining 782 newborns appeared healthy. Predictive blood tests were performed on 281 (34.9%) of the newborns, out of which 126 (44.8%) of them had a positive test result. However, blood cultures were obtained from 134 (16.6%) of the total cohort. Intravenous antibiotics were administered to 33 (4.1%) of the newborns. All symptomatic newborns had a positive predictive blood test result, and two of them had culture-proven EOS. Blood cultures obtained from the remaining 107 asymptomatic newborns were negative. In this context, 140 newborns needed to be pricked for positive predictive blood tests to predict one case of EOS. However, if the positive predictive blood tests were only performed on symptomatic newborns, then only 14 newborns would need to be pricked to predict one case of EOS.

CONCLUSION

Based on the present study, it is advised to follow the current AAP recommendation against predicting EOS by solely relying on CBC with differential or CRP. The study suggests that the enhanced observation approach is a more sensible option for managing EOS, but this needs to be confirmed in a larger study.

Monocentric observational cohort study to investigate the transmission of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales in a neonatal intensive care unit in Heidelberg, Germany

Third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales is a major threat for newborns in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). The route of acquisition in a non-outbreak setting should be investigated to implement adequate infection prevention measures. To identify risk factors for colonization with and to investigate the transmission pattern of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales in a NICU setting. This monocentric observational cohort study in a tertiary NICU in Heidelberg, Germany, enrolled all hospitalized neonates screened for cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales. Data were collected from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2021. Weekly screening by rectal swabs for colonization with third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales was performed for all newborns until discharge. Whole-genome sequencing was performed for molecular characterization and transmission analysis. In total, 1,287 newborns were enrolled. The median length of stay was 20 (range 1-250) days. Eighy-eight infants (6.8%) were colonized with third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales. Low birth weight [<1500 g (adjusted odds ratio, 5.1; 95% CI 2.2-11.5; P < 0.001)] and longer hospitalization [per 30 days (adjusted odds ratio, 1.7; 95% CI 1.5-2.0; P < 0.001)] were associated with colonization or infection with drug-resistant Enterobacterales in a multivariate analysis. Enterobacter cloacae complex was the most prevalent third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales detected, 64.8% (59 of 91). Whole-genome sequencing, performed for the available 85 of 91 isolates, indicated 12 transmission clusters involving 37 patients. This cohort study suggests that transmissions of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales in newborns occur frequently in a non-outbreak NICU setting, highlighting the importance of surveillance and preventive measures in this vulnerable patient group. IMPORTANCE Preterm newborns are prone to infections. Therefore, infection prevention should be prioritized in this vulnerable patient group. However, outbreaks involving drug-resistant bacteria, such as third-generation resistant Enterobacterales, are often reported. Our study aims to investigate transmission and risk factors for acquiring third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales in a non-outbreak NICU setting. Our data indicated that premature birth and low birth weight are significant risk factors for colonization/infection with third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales. Furthermore, we could identify putative transmission clusters by whole-genome sequencing, highlighting the importance of preemptive measures to prevent infections in this patient collective.

Comparison of diagnoses of early-onset sepsis associated with use of Sepsis Risk Calculator versus NICE CG149: a prospective, population-wide cohort study in London, UK, 2020-2021

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare the incidence of early-onset sepsis (EOS) in infants ≥34 weeks' gestation identified >24 hours after birth, in hospitals using the Kaiser Permanente Sepsis Risk Calculator (SRC) with hospitals using the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Prospective observational population-wide cohort study involving all 26 hospitals with neonatal units colocated with maternity services across London (10 using SRC, 16 using NICE).

PARTICIPANTS

All live births ≥34 weeks' gestation between September 2020 and August 2021.

OUTCOME MEASURES

EOS was defined as isolation of a bacterial pathogen in the blood or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture from birth to 7 days of age. We evaluated the incidence of EOS identified by culture obtained >24 hours to 7 days after birth. We also evaluated the rate empiric antibiotics were commenced >24 hours to 7 days after birth, for a duration of ≥5 days, with negative blood or CSF cultures.

RESULTS

Of 99 683 live births, 42 952 (43%) were born in SRC hospitals and 56 731 (57%) in NICE hospitals. The overall incidence of EOS (<72 hours) was 0.64/1000 live births. The incidence of EOS identified >24 hours was 2.3/100 000 (n=1) for SRC vs 7.1/100 000 (n=4) for NICE (OR 0.5, 95% CI (0.1 to 2.7)). This corresponded to (1/20) 5% (SRC) vs (4/45) 8.9% (NICE) of EOS cases (χ=0.3, p=0.59). Empiric antibiotics were commenced >24 hours to 7 days after birth in 4.4/1000 (n=187) for SRC vs 2.9/1000 (n=158) for NICE (OR 1.5, 95% CI (1.2 to 1.9)). 3111 (7%) infants received antibiotics in the first 24 hours in SRC hospitals vs 8428 (15%) in NICE hospitals.

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference in the incidence of EOS identified >24 hours after birth between SRC and NICE hospitals. SRC use was associated with 50% fewer infants receiving antibiotics in the first 24 hours of life.

What's new in the management of neonatal early-onset sepsis?

The expert guidelines highlighted in this review provide an evidence-based framework for approaching at-risk infants and allow for a more limited and standardised approach to antibiotic use. While these guidelines have significantly reduced antibiotic utilisation worldwide, optimally each unit would individualise their approach to early onset sepsis (EOS) based on the neonatal population they serve and available resources. As advancements in EOS research continue and limitations with sepsis prediction tools are addressed, it is inevitable that our risk stratification and management guidelines will become more precise.

Immediate birth for women between 34 and 37 weeks of gestation with prolonged preterm prelabour rupture of membranes and detection of vaginal or urine group B streptococcus: an economic evaluation

Objective

What are the costs, benefits and harms of immediate birth compared with expectant management in women with prolonged preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (PPROM) at 34⁺⁰–36⁺⁶ weeks of gestation and detection of vaginal or urine group B streptococcus (GBS)?

Design

Mathematical decision model comprising three independent decision trees.

Setting

UK National Health Service (NHS) and personal social services perspective.

Population

Women testing positive for GBS with PPROM at 34⁺⁰–36⁺⁶ weeks of gestation.

Methods

The model estimates lifetime costs and quality‐adjusted life years (QALYs) using evidence from randomised trials, UK NHS data sources and further observational studies. Simulated events include neonatal infections, morbidity associated with preterm birth and consequences of caesarean birth. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSAs) were performed.

Main outcome measures

QALYs, costs and incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio (ICER).

Results

In this population, immediate birth dominates expectant management: it is more effective (average lifetime QALYs, 24.705 versus 24.371) and it is cheaper (average lifetime costs, £14,372 versus £19,311). In one‐way sensitivity analysis, results are robust to all but the odds ratio estimating the relative effect on incidence of infections. Threshold analysis shows that the odds of infection only need to be >1.5% with expectant management for the benefit of avoiding infections to outweigh the disadvantages of immediate birth. In PSA, immediate birth is the preferred option in >80% of simulations.

Conclusions

Neonatal GBS infections are expensive to treat and may result in substantial adverse health consequences. Therefore, immediate birth, which is associated with a reduced risk of neonatal infection compared with expectant management, is expected to generate better health outcomes and decreased lifetime costs.

Tweetable abstract

For women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes and group B streptococcus in vaginal or urine samples, immediate birth is associated with improved health in their babies and reduced costs, compared with expectant management.

For women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes and group B streptococcus in vaginal or urine samples, immediate birth is associated with improved health in their babies and reduced costs, compared with expectant management.

Serotype distribution and incidence of invasive early onset and late onset group B streptococcal disease amongst infants in Singapore

Background

The current group B streptococcal (GBS) preventive measures had reduced invasive GBS early onset disease (EOD) incidences worldwide, but the late onset disease (LOD) incidences had remained unchanged. Administration of a safe and effective GBS vaccine in addition to the current strategies were thought to be the next steps in reducing the incidences of invasive GBS infection especially LOD. In this study, we aimed to examine the causative GBS serotypes in invasive GBS disease, determine the incidences of EOD and LOD, and compare the risk factors between EOD and LOD.

Methods

A retrospective study of infants ≤ 90-day-old over an 8-year period (2010–2017). The incidences of EOD and LOD were obtained by using patients with EOD and LOD who were born in our institution as the numerator and the live births in our institution per year of the study period as the denominator. Available GBS isolates were serotyped by the National Public Health Laboratory using capsular serotyping methods. The risk factors of EOD and LOD were compared.

Results

A total of 71 infants were identified; 16 (22.5%) and 55 (77.5%) of them had EOD and LOD, respectively. Serotype III (n = 42, 71.2%) was the most common serotype amongst the 59 isolates available for serotyping. Serotypes Ia, Ib, II, III, and V accounted for 98.3% (n = 58) of the invasive GBS diseases. The overall incidence was 0.42 per 1000 live births. The mean incidences of EOD and LOD were 0.13 per 1000 live births and 0.29 per 1000 live births, respectively. On multivariate analysis, risk factors for LOD as compared to EOD were: Chinese ethnicity (OR 27.1, 95% CI 3.0–243.1, p = 0.003) and negative/unknown maternal GBS status (OR 20.0, 95% CI 2.0–250.0, p = 0.012). Prematurity and intrapartum risk factors (peripartum maternal pyrexia, prolonged rupture of membrane) of EOD were not associated with LOD.

Conclusions

The LOD incidence had remained higher than EOD incidence in our cohort. A GBS vaccine that covers the major causative serotypes found in our cohort can potentially reduce the overall GBS disease burden in the country.