1
|
Milman T, Grossniklaus HE, Goldman-Levy G, Kivelä TT, Coupland SE, White VA, Mudhar HS, Eberhart CG, Verdijk RM, Heegaard S, Gill AJ, Jager MJ, Rodríguez-Reyes AA, Esmaeli B, Hodge JC, Cree IA. The 5th Edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of the Eye and Orbit. Ocul Oncol Pathol 2023; 9:71-95. [PMID: 37900189 PMCID: PMC10601864 DOI: 10.1159/000530730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Tatyana Milman
- Departments of Ophthalmology and Pathology, Wills Eye Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Hans E. Grossniklaus
- Departments of Ophthalmology and Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Gabrielle Goldman-Levy
- World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Tero T. Kivelä
- Ophthalmic Pathology Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Sarah E. Coupland
- George Holt Chair of Pathology/Consultant Histopathologist, Liverpool Clinical Laboratories, Liverpool University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Valerie A. White
- World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Hardeep Singh Mudhar
- National Specialist Ophthalmic Pathology Service (NSOPS), Department of Histopathology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | - Charles G. Eberhart
- Departments of Pathology and Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Robert M. Verdijk
- Section Ophthalmic Pathology, Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Steffen Heegaard
- Department of Pathology, Eye Pathology Section and Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anthony J. Gill
- Department of Pathology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Cancer Diagnosis and Pathology Group, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital St Leonards NSW, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
- NSW Health Pathology, Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards NSW, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Martine J. Jager
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Abelardo A. Rodríguez-Reyes
- Ophthalmic Pathology Service, Asociación para Evitar la Ceguera en México, I.A.P. Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Bita Esmaeli
- Orbital Oncology and Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery, Department of Plastic Surgery, MDAnderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Ian A. Cree
- World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - on behalf of the WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board
- Departments of Ophthalmology and Pathology, Wills Eye Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Departments of Ophthalmology and Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
- World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France
- Ophthalmic Pathology Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- George Holt Chair of Pathology/Consultant Histopathologist, Liverpool Clinical Laboratories, Liverpool University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
- National Specialist Ophthalmic Pathology Service (NSOPS), Department of Histopathology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK
- Departments of Pathology and Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Section Ophthalmic Pathology, Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Eye Pathology Section and Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Pathology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Cancer Diagnosis and Pathology Group, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital St Leonards NSW, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
- NSW Health Pathology, Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards NSW, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Ophthalmic Pathology Service, Asociación para Evitar la Ceguera en México, I.A.P. Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Mexico City, Mexico
- Orbital Oncology and Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery, Department of Plastic Surgery, MDAnderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fraenkel D, Löw U, Abdin AD, Seitz B. Elevated intraocular pressure as presenting sign of iris ring melanoma. J Fr Ophtalmol 2023; 46:e129-e131. [PMID: 37061384 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2022.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Revised: 06/12/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 04/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- D Fraenkel
- Department of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center UKS, Kirrbergerstraße 100, Building 22, 66424 Homburg/Saar, Germany.
| | - U Löw
- Department of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center UKS, Kirrbergerstraße 100, Building 22, 66424 Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - A D Abdin
- Department of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center UKS, Kirrbergerstraße 100, Building 22, 66424 Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - B Seitz
- Department of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center UKS, Kirrbergerstraße 100, Building 22, 66424 Homburg/Saar, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Iris Ring Melanoma Presenting as Scleral Pigmentation. Case Rep Ophthalmol Med 2022; 2022:4840380. [PMID: 35832837 PMCID: PMC9273431 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4840380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2021] [Revised: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
To report a patient with a very rare variant of iris melanoma that grows in the shape of a ring (ring melanoma). A 65-year-old patient was examined because of a pigmented lesion on the sclera. After a complete ophthalmic and ultrasound examination, a ring melanoma was diagnosed. Enucleation of the affected eye was performed, and histology report confirmed iris ring melanoma. This type of malignancy represents an exceedingly rare variant of uveal melanoma, and because of atypical clinical picture, it can be easily overlooked or misdiagnosed, which often delays adequate treatment. Gonioscopy, transillumination, and ultrasound help us to recognize and diagnose ring melanoma. Suspicion should be raised with a clinical picture that shows unilateral pigmentary glaucoma. The objective of this presentation is to describe and outline the challenging diagnosis and management of this rare disease entity.
Collapse
|
4
|
Brachytherapy or enucleation in ring melanoma patients: which is better? Preliminary results of the authors' own experiences. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2021; 13:433-440. [PMID: 34484358 PMCID: PMC8407261 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2021.108598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2021] [Accepted: 04/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose A retrospective evaluation of effectiveness of brachytherapy or enucleation in treatment of rare form of uveal melanoma: ring melanoma. Material and methods Analysis comprised 49 patients treated from 2000 to 2019 for ring melanoma involving ciliary body. In 15 patients, primary treatment consisted of brachytherapy (106Ru or 125I), whereas in 34 patients, eyeballs were enucleated. The evaluation concerned differences between analyzed groups relating to the clinical and histopathological features as well as overall survival, cancer-specific overall survival, and disease-free survival. Results No significant differences between the analyzed groups were found with regards to clinical and histopathological features, apart from intra-ocular pressure (increased in the enucleation group). Kaplan-Meier analysis did not reveal any significant differences between the group treated with enucleation and the group undergoing brachytherapy, both with regards to overall survival (p = 0.325) and cancer-specific overall survival (p = 0.477). A significant difference was observed in disease-free survival (p = 0.009), which was significantly shorter in the group undergoing brachytherapy. In the analysis of parameters of the applied brachytherapy, no significant differences between patients with and without local recurrence were found. Mean observation period was 350.8 weeks (range, 24-996 weeks, SD = 231.6). A local recurrence occurred in 11 (22.4%) patients, including 3 (6.1%) in enucleation and 8 (16.3%) after brachytherapy groups. Metastasis developed in 11 (22.4%) cases after a mean follow-up of 133 weeks (33.25 months), range 3-655 weeks. Conclusions Preliminary observations may suggest that brachytherapy in this rare form of uveal melanoma, such as ring melanoma involving the ciliary body, may be taken into consideration as a useful alternative to enucleation. However, the confirmation of such an approach requires a larger patients’ group to be gathered, and also a longer follow-up period. This is especially important in patients with a good baseline visual acuity in the affected eye, or when the neoplasm is present in the remaining eye with vision.
Collapse
|
5
|
Frizziero L, Midena E, Trainiti S, Londei D, Bonaldi L, Bini S, Parrozzani R. Uveal Melanoma Biopsy: A Review. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11081075. [PMID: 31366043 PMCID: PMC6721328 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11081075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2019] [Revised: 07/18/2019] [Accepted: 07/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Intraocular tumor diagnosis is based on clinical findings supported by additional imaging tools, such as ultrasound, optical coherence tomography and angiographic techniques, usually without the need for invasive procedures or tissue sampling. Despite improvements in the local treatment of uveal melanoma (UM), the prevention and treatment of the metastatic disease remain unsolved, and nearly 50% of patients develop liver metastasis. The current model suggests that tumor cells have already spread by the time of diagnosis, remaining dormant until there are favorable conditions. Tumor sampling procedures at the time of primary tumor diagnosis/treatment are therefore now commonly performed, usually not to confirm the diagnosis of UM, but to obtain a tissue sample for prognostication, to assess patient's specific metastatic risk. Moreover, several studies are ongoing to identify genes specific to UM tumorigenesis, leading to several potential targeted therapeutic strategies. Genetic information can also influence the surveillance timing and metastatic screening type of patients affected by UM. In spite of the widespread use of biopsies in general surgical practice, in ophthalmic oncology the indications and contraindications for tumor biopsy continue to be under debate. The purpose of this review paper is to critically evaluate the role of uveal melanoma biopsy in ophthalmic oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luisa Frizziero
- IRCCS-Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico-Fondazione Bietti, 00198 Rome, Italy
| | - Edoardo Midena
- IRCCS-Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico-Fondazione Bietti, 00198 Rome, Italy.
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.
| | - Sara Trainiti
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Davide Londei
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Laura Bonaldi
- Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology, IOV-IRCCS - Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Silvia Bini
- IRCCS-Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico-Fondazione Bietti, 00198 Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Thariat J, Rahmi A, Salleron J, Mosci C, Butet B, Maschi C, Lanza F, Lanteri S, Baillif S, Herault J, Mathis T, Caujolle JP. Proton Beam Therapy for Iris Melanomas in 107 Patients. Ophthalmology 2017; 125:606-614. [PMID: 29128229 DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2017] [Revised: 10/01/2017] [Accepted: 10/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To report on the clinical characteristics and outcomes for patients with iris melanoma using proton therapy. DESIGN Retrospective study. PARTICIPANTS One hundred seven patients with iris melanoma from 3 regional ophthalmologic centers. METHODS A retrospective study was conducted for iris melanoma patients from 3 regional ophthalmologic centers referred to and treated at a single proton therapy facility between 1996 and 2015. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES At each follow-up visit, examinations included measurement of best-corrected VA, slit-lamp, examination, indirect ophthalmoscopy, and ultrasound biomicroscopy. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 49.5 months, 5 of 107 patients experienced a local relapse within a median of 36.3 months. The cumulative incidence of relapse was 7.5% at 5 years. All 5 patients showed involvement of the iridocorneal angle (P = 0.056). Diffuse iris melanoma showed a higher risk of relapse (P = 0.044). Four patients showed out-of-field relapse and 1 showed angular relapse. Three patients were retreated with proton therapy, whereas 2 other patients, one with T1b disease and another with diffuse T3 disease, underwent secondary enucleation. None of the patients experienced metastases nor died of iris melanoma. Vision improved in 59.4% of patients (n = 60/101). However, cataracts occurred in 57.4% of the 54 patients (n = 31) without cataract or implant at diagnosis. Secondary glaucoma was reported in 7.6% of the patients (n = 8), uveitis in 4.7% (n = 5), and hyphema in 3.7% (n = 4). All but 5 cases of complications were mild, transient, and not sight limiting after treatment. Five cases of glaucoma, including 1 with uveitis, were severe and associated with visual deterioration. CONCLUSIONS Proton therapy showed efficacy and limited morbidity in iris melanomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliette Thariat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Centre Francois Baclesse, Normandie Universite-Unicaen, Caen, France; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France.
| | - Ahmed Rahmi
- Department of Ophthalmology, Croix-Rousse University Hospital, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Julia Salleron
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Management, Institut de Cancerologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-Les-Nancy, France
| | - Carlo Mosci
- Department of Ophthalmology, Ocular Oncology Center, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Genoa, Italy
| | - Benjamin Butet
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Pasteur 2, Nice, France
| | - Celia Maschi
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Pasteur 2, Nice, France
| | - Francesco Lanza
- Department of Ophthalmology, Ocular Oncology Center, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Genoa, Italy
| | - Sara Lanteri
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Pasteur 2, Nice, France
| | - Stephanie Baillif
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Pasteur 2, Nice, France
| | - Joel Herault
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Thibaud Mathis
- Department of Ophthalmology, Croix-Rousse University Hospital, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nevoid iris melanoma, case report. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016; 92:347-350. [PMID: 27262610 DOI: 10.1016/j.oftal.2016.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2015] [Revised: 04/27/2016] [Accepted: 04/28/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
CASE REPORT The case is presented of a patient with diagnosis of iris nevus in the left eye in youth with a poor follow-up, who referred a decreased visual acuity in that eye. A hyphaema and a 3×4×3mm nodule with irregular pigmentation was observed. Excision of the tumour and histological analysis confirmed the suspicion of iris melanoma in stage Ia. DISCUSSION Despite the low grade malignancy of iris melanoma and the low frequency of transformation of iris nevus into melanoma, a follow-up is required for its early diagnosis and treatment.
Collapse
|
8
|
Proton beam therapy for presumed and confirmed iris melanomas: a review of 36 cases. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2014; 252:1515-21. [PMID: 25038910 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-014-2735-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2014] [Revised: 06/23/2014] [Accepted: 07/02/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To report the clinical features and outcomes of iris melanomas treated by proton beam therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective study was conducted at the Croix-Rousse University Hospital of Lyon, Department of Ophthalmology, in 36 patients treated by proton beam therapy for presumed (n = 29) and confirmed (n = 7) iris melanomas between July 1997 and October 2010. Ciliary body melanomas with iris involvement were excluded. The patients' mean age was 54.4 years (range, 22-82 years). The average tumor diameter was 3.8 mm (range, 2.5-8.0). The iridocorneal angle was invaded by the tumor in 47% of cases (n = 17), the ciliary body in 17% of cases (n = 6), and the sclera in 3% (n = 1). Raised intraocular pressure was present before treatment in 11.1 % of cases (n = 4). Tumor biopsy was performed in 19% of cases (n = 7). Four patients had undergone an initial incomplete surgical excision of tumor before radiotherapy. Surgical preparation of the eye with tantalum ring positioning had been performed in all cases 3-4 weeks before irradiation. The prescribed dose was 60 Cobalt Gray Equivalent (CGE) of proton beam radiotherapy delivered in four fractions on four consecutive days. RESULTS The median follow-up was 50 months (mean 60.5, range 15-136). One patient (2.7%) was lost to follow-up. None of the patients showed tumor progression, local recurrence, or metastasis. None of the patients required secondary enucleation. Cataract was developed in 62% of patients, glaucoma in two cases (6%) after irradiation, and hyphema with the aggravation of pre-existing glaucoma in one patient. No patients developed neovascular glaucoma. CONCLUSIONS Proton beam therapy appears to be the treatment of choice for the conservative treatment of iris melanomas with excellent tumor control and an acceptable rate of complications. Longer follow-up studies on a larger series is necessary to consolidate these results.
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
A majority of intraocular tumors can be diagnosed based on clinical examination and ocular imaging studies, which obviate the need for diagnostic ophthalmic fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB). Overall, diagnostic accuracy of ophthalmic FNAB is high but limited cellularity can compromise the diagnostic potential of ophthalmic aspirate samples. The role of ophthalmic FNAB is limited in retinal tumors. Orbital FNAB should be considered in the evaluation of lacrimal gland tumors, orbital metastasis, and lymphoproliferative lesions. Negative cytologic diagnosis of malignancy should not be considered unequivocal proof that an intraocular malignancy does not exist. With improved understanding of genetic prognostic factors of uveal melanoma, ophthalmic FNAB is gaining popularity for prognostic purposes in combination with eye conserving treatment of the primary tumor. In special clinical indications, ancillary studies such as immunohistochemistry and FISH can be performed on ophthalmic FNAB samples. Assistance of an experienced cytopathologist cannot be overemphasized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arun D Singh
- Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Giuliari GP, Krema H, McGowan HD, Pavlin CJ, Simpson ER. Clinical and ultrasound biomicroscopy features associated with growth in iris melanocytic lesions. Am J Ophthalmol 2012; 153:1043-9. [PMID: 22321804 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2011] [Revised: 11/07/2011] [Accepted: 11/08/2011] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the clinical and ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) features associated with growth in iris melanocytic lesions. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective case series analysis. METHODS We included all iris melanocytic lesions that were monitored between January 2005 and November 2009. At the end of the analysis, 44 eyes of 44 patients were included in the final analysis. The clinical features analyzed were: iris color, largest base diameter, radial location of the lesion epicenter, circumferential location of the lesion epicenter, lesion configuration, lesion pigmentation, intrinsic vascularity within the lesion, presence of associated pigmentation, the impact on the pupil, presence of iris atrophy, and lesion-induced localized cataracts. The UBM features included lesion thickness, presence of corneal touch, presence of surface plaque, internal structure, and internal reflectivity. Regression analysis was performed to define the features associated with growth. RESULTS Twenty-three percent of the lesions showed documented growth. Mean follow-up was 21.4 months (range: 10-48). Clinical features associated with growth were a large basal diameter at baseline (P = .004) and inferior location (P = .004). UBM features associated with growth were: a greater baseline thickness (P = .01), presence of corneal touch (P = .007), an irregular internal structure (P = .0001), and the presence of dots and linear streaks (P < .0001). Clinical features that were not associated with growth were the radial location of the lesion in the iris (P > .999), lesion configuration (P > .999), lesion pigmentation (P > .999), the presence of pigment dispersion (P = .70), iris freckles (P = .15), corectopia (P > .999), ectropion (P > .999), and intrinsic vascularity (P = .70). UBM features not associated with growth were the presence of a surface plaque (P = .07) and the internal reflectivity (P = .77). CONCLUSION Substantial growth in iris melanocytic lesions is associated with original larger basal diameter and inferior lesion location. On UBM growth is associated with greater original thickness, presence of corneal touch, and an irregular internal structure. Presence of these features could modify the frequency of observation of those lesions.
Collapse
|
11
|
Petousis V, Finger PT, Milman T. Anterior segment tumor biopsy using an aspiration cutter technique: clinical experience. Am J Ophthalmol 2011; 152:771-5.e1. [PMID: 21794840 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.04.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2010] [Revised: 04/26/2011] [Accepted: 04/29/2011] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report the results and complications of an aspiration cutter-assisted anterior segment tumor biopsy performed under viscoelastic. DESIGN Retrospective, consecutive, interventional case series. METHODS Fifty-five patients with anterior segment tumors underwent aspiration cutter-assisted biopsy at a single center. Fifty-six biopsies were performed, because 1 eye underwent biopsy twice. Indications for biopsy included: suspected anterior segment malignancy, patient's desire for pathologic confirmation before treatment, atypical tumor, and genetic tumor analysis. The main evaluated outcomes were the perioperative visual acuity, the biopsy technique, and related complications. RESULTS The initial sample comprised 55 consecutively biopsied patients, from which a minimum 1-month follow-up existed for 52 biopsy samples. The median total follow-up was 30.4 months (range, 1 to 190 months). The mean initial visual acuity was 20/50 before and 20/50 1 month after biopsy. No patient lost vision. Most cases were suspected iris melanoma (n = 39/56; 69.6%), followed by suspicious iris nevi (n = 4/56; 7.1%) and melanocytoma (n = 4/56; 7.1%). Seven (n = 7/52; 13.4%) wounds required a single 10-0 nylon suture to achieve negative Seidel test results at the corneal entry site. Postoperative surgical findings included transiently increased intraocular pressure (n = 6/52; 11.5%), 1 hyphema, 1 flare, and 1 persistent pupillary defect. All but the pupillary defect resolved within 4 weeks of the biopsy procedure. There were no secondary infections or cataracts. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that small-incision, aspiration cutter-assisted anterior segment biopsy seems to be a safe and effective procedure. No short- or long-term complications that would prevent its use were noted.
Collapse
|
12
|
Eide N, Walaas L. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy and other biopsies in suspected intraocular malignant disease: a review. Acta Ophthalmol 2009; 87:588-601. [PMID: 19719804 DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01637.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Ocular oncologists require a strong indication for intraocular biopsy before the procedure can be performed because it carries a risk for serious eye complications and the dissemination of malignant cells. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the extent to which this restricted practice is supported by evidence from previous reports and to outline our main indications and contraindications. The different intraocular biopsy techniques in the anterior and posterior segment are discussed with a focus on our preferred method, fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB). In the literature, complications are typically under-reported, which reduces the possibilities of evaluating the risks correctly and of making fair comparisons with other biopsy methods. In FNAB, the exact placement of the needle is critical, as is an accurate assessment of the size of the lesion. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy is usually not a reliable diagnostic tool in lesions < 2 mm in thickness. It is very advantageous to have a cytopathologist present in the operating theatre or close by. This ensures adequate sampling and encourages repeated biopsy attempts if necessary. This approach reduces false negative results to < 3%. Adjunct immunocytochemistry is documented to increase specificity and is essential for diagnosis and management in about 10% of cases. In some rare pathological processes the diagnosis depends ultimately on the identification of specific cell markers. An accurate diagnosis may have a decisive influence on prognosis. The cytogenetic prognostications made possible after FNAB are reliable. Biopsy by FNA has a low complication rate. The calculated risk for retinal detachment is < 4%. Intraocular haemorrhage is frequently observed, but clears spontaneously in nearly all cases. Only a single case of epibulbar seeding of malignant cells at the scleral pars plana puncture site of transvitreal FNAB has been documented. Endophthalmitis has been reported and adequate standard preoperative preparation is obligatory. An open biopsy is still an option in the anterior segment, but has been abandoned in the posterior segment. Although vitrectomy-based procedures are becoming increasingly popular, we recommend using FNAB as part of a stepwise approach. A vitrectomy-assisted biopsy should be considered in cases where FNAB fails. In any adult patient with suspected intraocular malignancy in which enucleation is not the obvious treatment, the clinician should strive for a diagnosis based on biopsy. When the lesion is too small for biopsy or the risks related to the procedure are too great, it is reasonable to be reluctant to biopsy. The standards applied in the treatment of intraocular malignant diseases should be equivalent to those in other fields of oncology. Our view is controversial and contrary to opinion that supports current standards of care for this group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nils Eide
- Vitreoretinal and Ocular Oncology Service, Department of Ophthalmology, Ullevål University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Vásquez LM, Pavlin CJ, McGowan H, Simpson ER. Ring melanoma of the ciliary body: clinical and ultrasound biomicroscopic characteristics. Can J Ophthalmol 2008. [DOI: 10.3129/i08-025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
|