Factors associated with second eye cataract surgery

Prevalence and Factors Associated With Second Eye Cataract Surgery and the Trend in the Time Interval Between the Two Eye Surgeries Based on the Malaysian National Eye Database

PURPOSE

To study the prevalence of second eye cataract surgery (SECS), trend in time interval between subsequent surgeries over the years, and factors associated with SECS utilization among patients who underwent cataract surgeries in the Ministry of Health (MOH), Malaysia.

DESIGN

Secondary cross-sectional analysis of the Malaysian National Eye Database (NED) data.

METHODS

The Malaysian Cataract Surgery Registry collected data on patients who had cataract surgery from 2002-2004 and 2007-2012. Data collected included demography, operative events, time interval between 2 surgeries, and postoperative visual outcomes. Descriptive analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Total surgeries increased from 11,954 in 2002 to 30,265 in 2012 with a proportionate increase in SECS (30.7% in 2002 to 34.3% in 2012). Poor vision (<6/12) was reduced from 81.1% to 14.2% after surgery. With improved data capturing, missing data reduced from 29.22% to 1.05%. The time interval between surgeries was 10.58 months in 2002 and 14.49 months in 2012. Malays (40.2%) and those aged 61-70 years (38.1%) had the highest number of SECS. Those aged 40-50 years (10.96 months) and with poorer vision (9.97 months) had the shortest time interval between the 2 surgeries. The commonest surgical method was phacoemulsification (72.3%). Negeri Sembilan State had the highest SECS rate (35.91%) and Melaka had the shortest interval between surgeries (10.15 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite an increase in the number of SECS, the time interval is still long. Poor presenting second eye vision and disparity among different states warrants the health authority's attention and intervention.

Prevalence of second-eye cataract surgery and time interval after first-eye surgery in Iran: a clinic-based study

Purpose:

To determine the prevalence of second-eye senile cataract surgery (SECS) as a proportion of all senile cataract surgeries and the trend in the interval between first and second cataract operations in a main referral and academic eye hospital.

Materials and Methods:

In this cross-sectional study, a list of patients who underwent senile cataract surgery over four consecutive years (2006-2009) was retrieved from hospital computer-based records as the sampling frame. With a systematic random method, 15% of records were selected (1,585 out of 10,517 records).

Results:

First- and second-eye operations were performed in 1,139 (71.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 69.5-74.1) and 446 eyes (28.1%; 95% CI, 25.9-30.35), respectively. The proportion of SECS procedures increased from 24.3% in 2006 to 33.4% in 2009 (P = 0.017). The median (interquartile range) interval between the two operations was 9 (4-24) months, which remained stable during the study period. The SECS rate was 10.4% higher (P = 0.01) and the time interval was 13 months shorter (P = 0.007) in patients who underwent phacoemulsification than extracapsular cataract extraction.

Conclusion:

The number of cataract operations in this tertiary eye care setting increased 1.5 fold over the study period. The proportion of second-eye operations also rose from 1/4 to 1/3 during the same time.

Non-Clinical Factors Associated with Variation in Cataract Surgery Waiting Times in Manitoba

Cataract surgery is the highest-volume surgical procedure in Canada, with over 200,000 performed annually, mostly (85%) on persons aged 65 or older. Concerns have been raised about wait times to access this procedure. This study explores the relationship between waiting times for cataract surgery in Manitoba and a variety of characteristics, including age, sex, socio-economic status, region of residence, health status, surgeon, and surgeon's caseload. The study included 6,114 individuals who had first-eye cataract surgery between November 1, 1998, and March 31, 2000, in Winnipeg, MB. Significant predictors of variation in wait times were age, sex, having a hospitalization while waiting, and surgeon. The model explained 32.5 per cent of the variance in wait times; specific surgeon independently explained 29.5 per cent of the variance. Median waiting times varied widely by surgeon, ranging from 61 to 399 days. Differences in surgeons' expected wait times should be available to patients and referring clinicians.

Discrete-event simulation applied to analysis of waiting lists. Evaluation of a prioritization system for cataract surgery

OBJECTIVES

To outline the methods used to build a discrete-event simulation model for use in decision-making in the context of waiting list management strategies for cataract surgery by comparing a waiting list prioritization system with the routinely used first-in, first-out (FIFO) discipline.

METHODS

The setting was the Spanish health system. The model reproduced the process of cataract, from incidence of need of surgery (meeting indication criteria), through demand, inclusion on a waiting list, and surgery. "Nonexpressed Need" represented the population that, even with need, would not be included on a waiting list. Parameters were estimated from administrative data and research databases. The impact of introducing a prioritization system on the waiting list compared with the FIFO system was assessed. For all patients entering the waiting list, the main outcome variable was waiting time weighted by priority score. A sensitivity analysis with different scenarios of mean waiting time was used to compare the two alternatives.

RESULTS

The prioritization system shortened waiting time (weighted by priority score) by 1.55 months (95% CI: 1.47 to 1.62) compared with the FIFO system. This difference was statistically significant for all scenarios (which were defined from a waiting time of 4 months to 24 months under the FIFO system). A tendency to greater time savings in scenarios with longer waiting times was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Discrete-event simulation is useful in decision-making when assessing health services. Introducing a waiting list prioritization system produced greater benefit than allocating surgery by waiting time only. Use of the simulation model would allow the impact of proposed policies to reduce waiting lists or assign resources more efficiently to be tested.

Time-trend and variations in the proportion of second-eye cataract surgery

Background

Despite recommendations for greater use of second-eye cataract surgery and the bilateral progression of the disease, there is a substantial proportion of unmet need for this treatment. Few studies have explored the factors associated with second-eye cataract surgery utilisation. The objective of our study was to estimate the proportion of second-eye cataract surgery, evaluate its time-trend, and explore differences in utilisation by patients' gender, age, and region of residence.

Methods

All senile cataract surgeries performed between 1999 and 2002 in the public health system of Catalonia (Spain) were obtained from the Minimum Data Set. The proportion of second-eye surgery from November 2000 to December 2002 was calculated. The time-trend of this proportion was characterised through linear regression models with the logarithmic transformation of time.

Results

The proportion of second-eye surgery was 30.0% and showed an increasing trend from 24.8% (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 21.6; 26.1) in November 2000 to 31.8% (95% CI 31.4; 33.6) in December 2002. This proportion was 1.9% (95% CI 0.9; 2.9) higher in women (p < 0.001) and held constant across time. Male patients aged less than 60 had the lowest proportion (22.6%; 95% CI 22.4; 22.9) and females between 70 and 79 had the highest proportion (27.4%; 95% CI 26.9; 27.9). The time-trend for the proportion of second-eye surgery in those aged over 80 years was greater than for younger ages, showing an increase of 9% at the end of the period for both males and females. Variations between regions decreased over time because regions with the lowest initial proportions of second-eye surgery (approximately 17%) showed a greater increase over the study period.

Conclusion

We predict greater utilization of second-eye surgery in patients aged 70 to 79 years and in women. A greater increase in the utilisation rates of second-eye surgery is expected in the regions with lower proportions and in older patients. The observed trend suggests that there will be a substantial proportion of unmet need for bilateral surgery.

In a randomized controlled trial, cataract surgery in both eyes increased benefits compared to surgery in one eye only

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Despite recommendation of surgery in both eyes in patients with bilateral cataract, there is little evidence about the benefits of second-eye surgery. The objective of this study was to compare the benefits of cataract surgery in both eyes with those of surgery in one eye only.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

Two-arm randomized controlled trial involving 296 patients with bilateral cataracts of two public teaching hospitals. Patients were randomly assigned to receive surgery in one eye only (control group) or surgery in both eyes, one eye at a time (intervention group). The main outcome measures were binocular visual acuity, binocular contrast sensitivity, stereopsis, and patient-reported visual disability (VF-14), measured 4-6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 135 (91.2%) and 139 (93.9%) patients completed the trial in the control and intervention groups, respectively. Postoperatively, intervention group presented a better visual acuity (difference of 0.07; 95% CI = 0.03, 0.12), stereopsis (0.62 log sec arc; 95% CI = 0.45, 0.79), and VF-14 (8.2 points; 95% CI = 4.4, 12.4). No significant differences were found for contrast sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

Bilateral cataract patients should have surgery in both eyes. Including stereopsis and patient-reported visual disability in the assessment of cataract patients, especially after first-eye surgery, will improve the evaluation of effectiveness.

Second eye cataract surgery: perceptions of a population assisted at a university hospital

OBJECTIVE

To identify daily life difficulties perceived by patients suffering from senile cataract before and after second eye cataract surgery.

METHODS

Longitudinal prospective study with 84 patients consecutively seen within the framework of the Cataract Project, with visual acuity equal to or higher than 20/30 in the pseudophakic eye, and equal to or lower than 20/40 with the best possible optical correction in the cataractous eye. A questionnaire was applied during an interview.

RESULTS

Before surgery, 60.7% complained about visual impairment (moderate or marked); after surgery, 92.8% had no difficulty. Routine activities, mobility, and leisure activities were significantly altered after surgery (P =.001).

CONCLUSION

According to the patients' perceptions, there was a significant reduction in visual difficulties after second eye cataract surgery.

A prospective study of the effect of a unilateral macular hole on sensory and motor binocular function and recovery following successful surgery

AIMS

To examine the effect of a unilateral full thickness macular hole on sensory and motor binocular function and to study recovery after successful surgical closure.

METHODS

Twenty eight consecutive patients undergoing surgery for a unilateral macular hole underwent orthoptic examination, including measurements of Titmus and TNO stereoacuity and motor fusion range before surgery. Twenty three patients had successful anatomical closure. Fifteen of these patients, who had both improved acuity in the operated eye following surgery and were available for further testing, underwent repeat orthoptic assessment 2-7 months after surgery.

RESULTS

In all patients stereoacuity was reduced before surgery, but few patients were subjectively aware of a deficit of depth perception affecting their everyday life. In those patients with improved Snellen acuity after surgery, stereoacuity measured by the Titmus stereotest also improved significantly, but not that measured by the TNO test. Two patients were aware of a subjective improvement in depth perception. Motor fusion was markedly reduced compared to normal before surgery, with only limited recovery after surgery.

CONCLUSION

A unilateral macular hole notably reduced both stereoacuity and motor fusion. Successful closure improved the deficit in stereoacuity associated with the hole when measured by a stereotest using contoured stimuli. The majority of patients were not subjectively aware of the deficit in stereoacuity or its improvement following surgery.

Changes in visual acuity of patients undergoing cataract surgery during the last two decades

PURPOSE

To compare preoperative visual acuities in patients who underwent cataract surgery between 1982 and 2000.

METHODS

Information on visual acuity (VA), ocular disease and general disease was obtained from records relating to samples of consecutive cataract operations in 1982, 1985, 1990, 1995 and 2000 in two hospitals in the Vaasa region of Finland.

RESULTS

Between 1982 and 2000, the average preoperative VA in the operated eye increased by 0.85 logMAR units (from logMAR 1.56 to logMAR 0.71) or 8.5 log lines. Corresponding decimal values are 0.03 and 0.2, respectively. In the better eye, VA increased from logMAR 0.64 to logMAR 0.37. Corresponding decimal values are 0.23 and 0.43, respectively. The incidence of cataract surgery increased from 1.0 to 7.2 operations per 1000 of the population per year over the period. For an annual increase of one operation per 1000 inhabitants, the increase in average VA before surgery is 1.3 log lines in the operated eye and 0.4 log lines in the better eye. The number of patients with visual impairment (WHO definition: VA < 0.3) before surgery fell from 47% to 15%, and the number of patients with profound visual handicaps (VA < 0.1) before surgery fell from 15% to 4%.

CONCLUSION

The preoperative vision of patients undergoing cataract surgery during the last two decades has improved significantly. Preoperative VA has increased linearly in line with the incidence of surgery. Only a small proportion of the increase in incidence of cataract surgery can be explained by the increasing average age of the population.

The Manitoba Cataract Waiting List Program

This article describes the Manitoba Cataract Waiting List Program. This program uses a centralized database to track and prioritize all patients waiting for cataract surgery. It provides an objective and reliable measure of the length of the wait, and patients on the waiting list are treated in a more equitable fashion through application of a uniform method of prioritization. The program will allow for long-term tracking of quality of care through monitoring of the average length of wait for patients with comparable functional impairment. It will also allow for long-term monitoring of thresholds for surgery. It has brought to light previously undocumented issues, such as the simultaneous booking of both eyes for cataract surgery and variations in waiting time between surgeons.

Indications for cataract surgery

This review article will attempt to guide ophthalmologists in deciding the indications for cataract surgery. It will consider this year's visual function questionnaires, ancillary vision tests, and postoperative outcome measures to assess visual function. Cultural factors, age, and gender are a few of the confounding variables in trying to assess visual function. The indications for cataract surgery in the 21st century have evolved dramatically since cataract surgery was first performed in the 1700s. The physicians' dictum in the Hippocratic oath of "do no harm" has determined the indications for cataract surgery over time. Today, doing no harm means operating on cataracts earlier than previously, as this is technically easier than in previous years, when poorer surgical techniques prevailed. However, are we operating on cataracts too early? This review will attempt to highlight the relevant factors that will help to determine the indications for cataract surgery.