Human insulin and porcine insulin in the treatment of diabetic children: comparison of metabolic control and insulin antibody production

Immunoregulatory Sertoli Cell Allografts Engineered to Express Human Insulin Survive Humoral-Mediated Rejection

An effective treatment and possible cure for type 1 diabetes is transplantation of pancreatic islets. Unfortunately, transplanted islets are rejected by the immune system with humoral-mediated responses being an important part of rejection. Sertoli cells (SC), an immune regulatory cell shown to survive as allografts long-term without immunosuppressants, have the potential to be used as a cell-based gene therapy vehicle to deliver endogenous insulin-a possible alternative to islets. Previously, we transduced a mouse SC line to produce human insulin. After transplantation into diabetic mice, these cells consistently produced low levels of insulin with graft survival of 75% at 50 days post-transplantation. The object of this study was to assess humoral immune regulation by these engineered SC. Both nontransduced and transduced SC survived exposure to human serum with complement in vitro. Analysis of allografts in vivo at 20 and 50 days post-transplantation revealed that despite IgG antibody detection, complement factor deposition was low and grafts survived through 50 days post-transplantation. Furthermore, the transduced SC secreted elevated levels of the complement inhibitor C1q binding protein. Overall, this suggests SC genetically engineered to express insulin maintain their ability to prevent complement-mediated killing. Since inhibiting complement-mediated rejection is important for graft survival, further studies of how SC modifies the immune response could be utilized to advance the use of genetically engineered SC or to prolong islet allograft survival to improve the treatment of diabetes.

Sertoli Cells Engineered to Express Insulin to Lower Blood Glucose in Diabetic Mice

Long-term survival of allo- and xenotransplanted immune-privileged Sertoli cells (SCs) is well documented suggesting that SCs can be used to deliver foreign proteins for cell-based gene therapy. The aim of this study was to use a lentivirus carrying proinsulin cDNA to achieve stable expression and lowering of blood glucose levels (BGLs). A SC line transduced with the lentivirus (MSC-LV-mI) maintained stable insulin expression in vitro. These MSC-LV-mI cells were transplanted and grafts were analyzed for cell survival, continued proinsulin mRNA, and insulin protein expression. All grafts contained MSC-LV-mI cells that expressed proinsulin mRNA and insulin protein. Transplantation of MSC-LV-mI cells into diabetic mice significantly lowered BGLs for 4 days after transplantation. Interestingly, in three transplanted SCID mice and one transplanted BALB/c mouse, the BGLs again significantly lowered by day 50 and 70, respectively. This is the first time SC transduced with a lentiviral vector was able to stably express insulin and lower BGLs. In conclusion, a SC line can be modified to stably express therapeutic proteins (e.g., insulin), thus taking us one step further in the use of SCs as an immune-privileged vehicle for cell-based gene therapy.

Recombinant Human Insulins - Clinical Efficacy and Safety in Diabetes Therapy

Insulin replacement therapy is the standard of care for patients with type 1 and advanced type 2 diabetes mellitus. Porcine and bovine pancreatic tissue was the source of the hormone for many years, followed by semisynthetic human insulin obtained by modification of animal insulin. With the development of recombinant DNA technology, recombinant (biosynthetic) human insulin became available in large amounts by biosynthesis in microorganisms (Escherichia coli, yeast) providing reliable supplies of the hormone worldwide at affordable costs. The purity and pharmaceutical quality of recombinant human insulin was demonstrated to be superior to animal and semisynthetic insulin and patients with diabetes could be safely and effectively transferred from animal or semisynthetic human insulin to recombinant human insulin with no change expected in insulin dose. The decision for change remains a clinical objective, follow-up after any change of insulin product is recommended to confirm clinical efficacy. This review provides a summary and retrospective assessment of early clinical studies with recombinant insulins (Insuman®, Humulin®, Novolin®).

Diabetic rats and mice are resistant to porcine and human insulin: flawed experimental models for testing islet xenografts

BACKGROUND

Islet transplantation is potentially a promising therapy for the restoration of carbohydrate control to diabetic patients. However, the global application of islet transplantation requires a ubiquitous source of beta cells. The xenotransplantation of porcine islets would provide such a source. Success in porcine islet xenografting has been achieved in diabetic primates. However, there are few reports of reversal of diabetes with porcine islet xenografts in rodent models of diabetes, relative to the number of successful rodent experiments performed as allografts. Here we report for the first time the inability of porcine (and human) insulin to control blood glucose levels in diabetic rodents determined by a series of dose escalating studies.

METHODS

Insulin was administered intravenously to streptozotocin induced diabetic Lewis rats, Balb/c and athymic Balb/c mice (n = 5 per group) at the following doses: Group I "physiological dose" (pd) of 0.16 U/kg for a total dose of 40 mU to a 250 g rat. Group II received 0.64 U/kg (4xpd), group III 1.6 U/kg (10xpd) and group IV 6.4 U/kg (40xpd). Blood glucose levels were monitored in each animal at seven time points: 0 (pre-injection), 10 min, 20 min, 30 min, 45 min, 1 h, 1.5 h, 2 h and 3 h post-injection. Serum insulin levels were also determined.

RESULTS

Diabetic Lewis rats achieved a maximum reduction in blood glucose from 22.1 +/- 1.8mmol/l to 8.0 +/- 3.1 mmol/l (a 63.7% reduction), 90 minutes post-injection of 6.4 U/kg dose of porcine insulin (40xpd). Human insulin was less effective at reducing blood glucose levels in rats than porcine insulin (P < 0.001). Porcine insulin reduced blood glucose levels in Balb/c mice from a mean of 18.2 +/- 2.1 mmol/l to a hypoglycemic minimum of 1.26 +/- 0.18 mmol/l a reduction of 93.0%, 60 min post-injection of the maximum dose of 6.4 U/kg. Balb/c mice were significantly more responsive to porcine insulin than Lewis rats at doses of 0.64 U/kg (P < 0.001), 1.6 U/kg (P < 0.05) and 6.4 U/kg (P < 0.001). Athymic Balb/c nude mice reached a maximum reduction in blood glucose from 21.6 +/- 1.8 mmol/l to 3.6 +/- 0.9 mmol/l (a 83.4% reduction) 120 min post-injection at a dose of 6.4 U/kg. Overall, athymic Balb/c nude mice were more resistant to porcine insulin than immunocompetent Balb/c mice at doses of 0.64 U/kg (P < 0.001), 1.6 U/kg (P < 0.001) and 6.4 U/kg (P < 0.05). Insulin diluent alone marginally increased blood glucose levels in all animals tested.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that restoration of normoglycemia in diabetic rodents is not ideal for testing porcine islets xenografts since the reversals of diabetes in these species requires 20 to 40 times the dose of porcine insulin used in humans.

'Human' insulin versus animal insulin in people with diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Human insulin was introduced for the routine treatment of diabetes mellitus in the early 1980s without adequate comparison of efficacy to animal insulin preparations. First reports of altered hypoglycaemia awareness after transfer to human insulin made physicians and especially patients uncertain about potential adverse effects of human insulin.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of different insulin species by evaluating their efficacy (in particular glycaemic control) and adverse effects profile (mainly hypoglycaemia).

SEARCH STRATEGY

A highly sensitive search for randomised controlled trials combined with key terms for identifying studies on human versus animal insulin was performed using The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and EMBASE. We also searched reference lists and databases of ongoing trials. Date of latest search: July 2004.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled clinical trials with diabetic patients of all ages that compared human to animal (for the most part purified porcine) insulin. Trial duration had to be at least one month in order to achieve reliable results on the main outcome parameter glycated haemoglobin.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Trial selection as well as evaluation of study quality was performed by two independent reviewers. The quality of reporting of each trial was assessed according to a modification of the quality criteria as specified by Schulz and by Jadad.

MAIN RESULTS

Altogether 2156 participants took part in the 45 randomised controlled studies that were discovered through extensive search efforts. Though many studies had a randomised, double-blind design, most studies were of poor methodological quality. Purified porcine and semi-synthetic insulin were most often investigated. No significant differences in metabolic control or hypoglycaemic episodes between various insulin species could be elucidated. Insulin dose and insulin antibodies did not show relevant dissimilarities.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

A comparison of the effects of human and animal insulin as well as of the adverse reaction profile did not show clinically relevant differences. Many patient-oriented outcomes like health-related quality of life or diabetes complications and mortality were never investigated in high-quality randomised clinical trials. The story of the introduction of human insulin might be repeated by contemporary launching campaigns to introduce pharmaceutical and technological innovations that are not backed up by sufficient proof of their advantages and safety.

'Human' insulin versus animal insulin in people with diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Human insulin was introduced for the routine treatment of diabetes mellitus in the early 1980s without adequate comparison of efficacy to animal insulin preparations. First reports of altered hypoglycaemia awareness after transfer to human insulin made physicians and especially patients uncertain about potential adverse effects of human insulin.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of different insulin species by evaluating their efficacy (in particular glycaemic control) and adverse effects profile (mainly hypoglycaemia).

SEARCH STRATEGY

A highly sensitive search for randomised controlled trials combined with key terms for identifying studies on human versus animal insulin was performed using the Cochrane Library (issue 2, 2002), Medline (1966 to May, 2002) and Embase (1974 to February, 2002). We also searched reference lists and databases of ongoing trials. Date of latest search: May 2002.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled clinical trials with diabetic patients of all ages that compared human to animal (for the most part purified porcine) insulin. Trial duration had to be at least one month in order to achieve reliable results on the main outcome parameter glycated haemoglobin.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Trial selection as well as evaluation of study quality was performed by two independent reviewers. The quality of reporting of each trial was assessed according to a modification of the quality criteria as specified by Schulz and by Jadad.

MAIN RESULTS

Altogether 2156 participants took part in the 45 randomised controlled studies that were discovered through extensive search efforts. Though many studies had a randomised, double-blind design, most studies were of poor methodological quality. Purified porcine and semi-synthetic insulin were most often investigated. No significant differences in metabolic control or hypoglycaemic episodes between various insulin species could be elucidated. Insulin dose and insulin antibodies did not show relevant dissimilarities.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

A comparison of the effects of human and animal insulin as well as of the adverse reaction profile did not show clinically relevant differences. Many patient-oriented outcomes like health-related quality of life or diabetes complications and mortality were never investigated in high-quality randomised clinical trials. The story of the introduction of human insulin might be repeated by contemporary launching campaigns to introduce pharmaceutical and technological innovations that are not backed up by sufficient proof of their advantages and safety.

Hypoglycaemia induced by exogenous insulin--'human' and animal insulin compared

AIMS

A systematic review of the literature was carried out to examine whether published evidence suggests a difference in the frequency and awareness of hypoglycaemia induced by 'human' and animal insulin.

METHODS

The review identified randomized controlled trials and studies of other designs including observational comparisons, case series and case reports in which the use of 'human' insulin was compared to animal insulin in people with diabetes. These were identified from bibliographic databases and hand-searches of key journals. The main outcome measures were frequency, severity, awareness and symptoms of insulin induced hypoglycaemia.

RESULTS

Fifty-two randomized controlled trials, 37 of double-blind design, were identified which included one or more of the relevant outcome measures. Of these, 21 specifically investigated hypoglycaemic frequency and awareness as primary outcomes (six in people with previously reported reduced hypoglycaemic awareness). The remainder of the identified trials reported hypoglycaemic outcomes as a secondary or incidental outcome during comparative investigations of efficacy or immunogenicity. Seven of the double-blind studies reported differences in frequency of hypoglycaemia or awareness of symptoms, although none of the studies which selected subjects on the basis of previously reported impaired awareness demonstrated significant differences between insulin species. Four of the unblinded trials reported differences in hypoglycaemia. This reached statistical significance in two of the studies. A further 56 studies of other designs and case reports were considered. In addition to the 10 case reports describing individuals with impaired hypoglycaemic awareness, nine studies reported differences in the incidence and manifestation of hypoglycaemia during 'human' insulin treatment. Notably, none of the four population time trend studies found any relationship between the increasing use of 'human' insulin and hospital admission for hypoglycaemia or unexplained death among those with diabetes. The largest case series could find no support for the hypothesis that an influence of treatment with 'human' insulin on hypoglycaemia had contributed to any of the 50 deaths investigated. When all types of studies considered are ranked in order of rigour (according to the accepted 'hierarchy of evidence'), it is the least rigorous which lend most support to the notion that treatment with 'human' insulin has an effect on the frequency, severity or symptoms of hypoglycaemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence does not support the contention that treatment with 'human' insulin per se affects the frequency, severity or symptoms of hypoglycaemia. However, a number of studies, mainly those of less rigorous design, describe an effect when people are transferred from animal insulin to 'human' insulin. It is not possible to state how common this is or whether the phenomenon is specific to 'human' insulin or an effect resulting from stricter glycaemic control (perhaps compounded, in some cases, by neurological complications in long-standing diabetes). This remaining uncertainty makes it essential that insulin from animal sources continues to be available so that clinicians and patients may retain this choice of treatment.

Adverse effects of exogenous insulin. Clinical features, management and prevention

Insulin has been in therapeutic use for around 70 years, and the range of adverse effects associated with its use is very limited. Insulin allergy and other local cutaneous reactions, which were common with the early insulins, are now rarely seen with highly purified and biosynthetic preparations. By far the most important complication of exogenous insulin is hypoglycaemia, which affects almost all insulin-treated patients and is largely a manifestation of nonphysiological insulin regimens and routes of administration. The problem of hypoglycaemia unawareness is now being increasingly recognised, with onset of severe neuroglycopenia and coma which is not preceded by the characteristic warning symptoms associated with autonomic activation. This can occur with excessively tight glycaemic control, and this situation is usually reversible. More commonly, however, hypoglycaemia unawareness is a chronic problem which is predominantly a feature of long duration of diabetes. Although individual episodes of hypoglycaemic coma can usually be effectively treated with parenteral dextrose or glucagon, management of patients with chronic hypoglycaemia unawareness is a difficult clinical challenge, with limited therapeutic options. In the past few years, there has been concern that the use of human insulin preparations may predispose to hypoglycaemia unawareness. The evidence for and against this is discussed, although at present it is difficult to draw any absolutely firm conclusions.

Insulin-dependent (type I) diabetes mellitus

Insulin-dependent (type I) diabetes mellitus is a chronic disease characterized by hyperglycemia, impaired metabolism and storage of important nutrients, evidence of autoimmunity, and long-term vascular and neurologic complications. Insulin secretory function is limited. Cell membrane binding is not primarily involved. The goal of treatment is to relieve symptoms and to achieve blood glucose levels as close to normal as possible without severe hypoglycemia. However, even with education and self-monitoring of the blood glucose level, attaining recommended target values (plasma glucose level less than 8.0 mmol/L before main meals for adults) remains difficult. Human insulin offers no advantage in glycemic control but is important in the management and prevention of immune-related clinical problems (e.g., injection-site lipoatrophy, insulin resistance and allergy) associated with the use of beef or pork insulin. Therapy with one or two injections per day of mixed short-acting or intermediate-acting insulin preparations is a compromise between convenience and the potential for achieving target plasma glucose levels. Intensive insulin therapy with multiple daily injections or continuous infusion with an insulin pump improves mean glycated hemoglobin levels; however, it increases rates of severe hypoglycemia and has not been shown to decrease the incidence of clinically significant renal, retinal or neurologic dysfunction. Future prospects include automated techniques of insulin delivery, immunosuppression to preserve endogenous insulin secretion and islet transplantation.

Comparison of human and porcine insulin therapies in children with newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus

A multicenter, longitudinal study of children below the age of 16 years with newly diagnosed Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes treated either with porcine monocomponent insulin (n = 26) or semisynthetic human monocomponent insulin (n = 26) was performed during the first 24 months after onset of diabetes. The two groups were carefully matched for age, duration of disease symptoms, initial metabolic values, islet cell antibodies and HLA-DR antigens. During the 24-month observation period there was no significant difference between the two groups in respect to the clinical course, insulin dosage, HbA1 and residual B-cell activity. No child in either group had a real remission without necessitating insulin therapy. The prevalence of insulin antibodies increased slowly and was 62% in the group treated by human insulin and 52% in the porcine insulin-treated group after 24 months. The titres were generally low and there was no statistical difference between the two groups in respect to insulin antibody formation.

Human insulin. A review of its biological activity, pharmacokinetics and therapeutic use

Human insulin, whether produced by recombinant DNA techniques (biosynthetic, insulin crb) or enzymatic modification of porcine insulin (semisynthetic, insulin emp) is equivalent in biological activity to porcine insulin following intravenous administration. Slight differences between human and porcine insulin in hypoglycaemic activity after subcutaneous injection appear to be related to differences in absorption, and are unlikely to be of major clinical importance. Similarly, reported minor differences in counterregulator hormone response to human insulin compared with porcine insulin need further study, but they are unlikely to have important clinical implications. In clinical use the therapeutic efficacy of human insulin is similar to that of porcine insulin. The lower antigenicity with human insulin relative to purified porcine insulin is of potential therapeutic value, and it is logical to use human insulin in newly diagnosed diabetics, in patients treated intermittently with insulin, in cases of immunological insulin resistance, and in patients with allergy and local reaction against animal insulin. Thus, human insulin seems to have no disadvantages compared with purified porcine insulin and may have some advantages. While there appears to be no compelling reason to change patients whose diabetes is presently well controlled with purified porcine insulin to human insulin, the availability of human insulin at a price equal to or less than that of animal origin makes such a change logical. In the meantime, human insulin should be considered the insulin of 'first choice' for newly diagnosed diabetics requiring insulin therapy and in carbohydrate intolerance and diabetes occurring during pregnancy.

Metabolic rhythms in adolescents with diabetes during treatment with porcine or human insulin

Metabolic rhythms were studied over 24 hours in eight adolescent diabetic patients during treatment with porcine insulin and after transfer to human insulin. Despite an increase in dose with human insulin no significant changes were found in fasting blood glucose, 24h mean blood glucose, or glycosylated haemoglobin concentrations. Significantly higher 24h mean blood lactate concentrations and lower total ketone bodies and glycerol concentrations were observed during treatment with human insulin. These findings are consistent with the increase in insulin dose and do not necessarily imply different metabolic responses to species differences in insulin.

Immunogenicity of semisynthetic human insulin in man. Long-term comparison with porcine monocomponent insulin

The levels of circulating IgG-insulin antibodies were determined in two groups of diabetic patients before and at 3-month intervals after starting insulin treatment either with monocomponent porcine insulin (n = 17) or with human semisynthetic insulin (SH) (n = 16). Patients were followed during 15.1 +/- 1.0 and 19.9 +/- 1.1 months, respectively (m +/- SEM). In addition, the quality of metabolic control and residual B-cell function were evaluated in the group under treatment with SHI. The percentage of patients who remained antibody-free after 12-21 months of treatment was 67.75% in the human insulin-treated group and only 25-43% in the one receiving porcine insulin (p less than 0.01). Moreover, insulin antibody titers, when present, were usually lower in subjects treated with human insulin. In SHI-treated patients: metabolic control was excellent during the first months of treatment as evidenced by values of mean daily blood glucose (7.3 +/- 0.6 mmol/l), M-index according to Schlichtkrull (7.4 +/- 2.4) and Hb1c (6.8 +/- 0.6%); residual B-cell function, evaluated at 3-month intervals by a circadian profile of plasma C-peptide did not decrease throughout the study; and a significant deterioration of blood glucose control occurred after 18 months of treatment, which might have been due to a less intensive supervision of the patients by the physicians and/or less careful attention by the patients themselves. This observation confirms the need for a continuous education of the patients regardless of the type of insulin used.