Medical management of fibroids

Uterine myomas: an overview of development, clinical features, and management

OBJECTIVE

To review the biology and the pathophysiology of uterine myomas, focus on options for management, and emphasize principles that will render the decision-making process as logical as possible.

DESIGN

Literature review and synthesis of the authors' experience and philosophy.

RESULTS

Uterine myomas are the most common solid pelvic tumors in women. There is increasing evidence that they have a genetic basis and that their growth is related to genetic predisposition, hormonal influences, and various growth factors. Treatment choices are wide and include pharmacologic, surgical, and radiographically directed intervention. Most myomas can be followed serially with surveillance for development of symptoms or progressive growth.

CONCLUSION

The past century has witnessed development of highly sophisticated diagnostic and therapeutic technology for myomas. The tools currently at our disposal permit greater management flexibility with safe options, which must be tailored to the individual clinical situation.

Goserelin. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and clinical use in sex hormone-related conditions

Goserelin is a synthetic analogue of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) [luteinising hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH); or gonadorelin] which stimulates gonadotrophin and sex hormone release in the short term, and then causes suppression with continued administration. Goserelin is given as a subcutaneous biodegradable depot incorporating 3.6 mg of the drug, which is released continuously at an average rate of 120 micrograms/day over 4 weeks. Monthly goserelin depot therapy produces partial disease remission or stabilisation in about 75% of men with previously untreated prostatic cancer, a rate equivalent to that achieved with orchidectomy or diethylstilbestrol (stilboestrol). The response to goserelin is more rapid than to diethylstilbestrol, and goserelin is better tolerated. About 30 to 45% of premenopausal women with breast cancer responded to goserelin using objective assessment criteria, suggesting comparability to ovariectomy. In benign hormone-dependent conditions, preoperative goserelin aids surgical removal of uterine leiomyoma (fibroids) and reduces blood loss, and 6 months of therapy relieves the signs and symptoms of endometriosis. The elevation in testosterone at the beginning of goserelin therapy can result in disease 'flare' in men with prostate cancer, and sex steroid suppression with continued treatment results in hot flushes and loss of libido in most patients. Thus, goserelin is an effective alternative to surgery or estrogen therapy in prostatic cancer palliation, and possibly to ovariectomy in premenopausal breast cancer. Other gynaecological conditions reliant on the pituitary-gonadal axis also appear amenable to hormone manipulation with goserelin.

Sequential Gn-RH superagonist and medroxyprogesterone acetate treatment of uterine leiomyomata

A group of 48 women with symptomatic leiomyomata were treated during 6 months with the short-acting Gn-RH superagonist analog buserelin. The first (group C) was followed up for an additional six months of no medication. The second (group M) was treated for 6 additional months with medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) at doses decreasing from 200 to 25 mg/day. Buserelin therapy significantly decreased uterine size (P less than 0.001) in all patients, the average final volume being 48.5% of the original (from 262 +/- 147 ml to 127 +/- 85.4 ml). In group C there was a significant (P less than 0.001) re-growth during the post-treatment observation period (from 120 +/- 81.0 ml to 198 +/- 77.2 ml); a significant (P less than 0.01) re-growth was also observed in group M during MPA medication (from 132 +/- 77.2 ml to 170 +/- 96.0 ml). The agonist had also a marked effect on fibroids: on average they decreased from 75.1 +/- 74.3 ml to 24.7 +/- 23.3 ml (P less than 0.025). In group C during the post-buserelin period of observation without treatment, there was a significant re-growth from 23.7 +/- 21.6 ml to 47.7 +/- 27.5 ml (P less than 0.001), whereas in group M treatment with MPA prevented any significant re-growth (from 25.6 +/- 24.8 to 30.6 +/- 32.9 ml; P greater than 0.3).