Lesson of the week: managing patients with deliberate self harm who refuse treatment in the accident and emergency department

Iatrogenic Complications of Compulsory Treatment in a Patient Presenting with an Emotionally Unstable Personality Disorder and Self-Harm

Attempted suicide and deliberate self-harm are common and challenging presentations in the emergency department. A proportion of these patients refuse interventions and this presents the clinical, legal, and ethical dilemma as to whether treatment should be provided against their will. Multiple factors influence this decision. It is difficult to foresee the multitude and magnitude of complications that can arise once it has been decided to treat individuals who do not consent. This case illustrates a particularly complex chain of events that occurred after treating someone against their will who presented with self-harm and suicidal ideation. These consequences are contrasted with those of not intervening when similar situations arose with the same patient.

Emergency psychiatric assessments: implications for senior house officer training

Aims and Method

In order to examine the opportunities for senior house officers (SHOs) to undertake emergency psychiatric assessments we conducted a retrospective cohort study of such assessments in a district general hospital.

Results

Senior house officers conducted few assessments for self-harm compared with psychiatric liaison nurses (P< 0.001), and were involved in only 40% of emergency referrals where psychiatric opinion was requested. Senior house officers continue to undertake more assessments out of hours than any other group (P< 0.01).

Clinical Implications

Although the introduction of psychiatric liaison nurses has improved capacity and reduced waiting times for emergency assessment, the opportunity for SHOs to undertake emergency assessments has been reduced, particularly with regard to assessment of suicidal risk following self-harm. These results suggest the need for better monitoring of SHO experience, particularly in the light of service developments that have an impact on psychiatric training.

The effectiveness of joint crisis plans for people with borderline personality disorder: protocol for an exploratory randomised controlled trial

Background

Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is a common mental disorder associated with raised mortality, morbidity and substantial economic costs. Although complex psychological interventions have been shown to be useful in the treatment of BPD, such treatments are expensive to deliver and therefore have limited availability and questionable cost-effectiveness. Less complex interventions are required for the management of BPD. A Joint Crisis Plan (JCP) is a record containing a service user's treatment preferences for the management of future crises and is created by the service user with the help of their treating mental health team. These plans have been shown to to be an effective way of reducing compulsory treatment in people with psychosis. However, to date they have not been used with individuals with BPD. This exploratory trial will examine whether use of a JCP is an effective and cost-effective intervention for people with BPD for reducing self-harm.

Methods/Design

In this single blind exploratory randomized controlled trial, a total of 120 participants (age >18 years with a primary diagnosis of DSM-IV borderline personality disorder) will be recruited from community mental health teams and, after completing a baseline assessment, will be assigned to one of two conditions: (1) a Joint Crisis Plan, or (2) treatment as usual. Those allocated to the JCP condition will take part in a facilitated meeting, the purpose of which will be to agree the contents of the plan. Following the meeting, a typed version of the JCP will be sent to the patient and to any other individuals specified by the participant. All participants will be followed-up at 6 months. The primary outcome measures are: any self-harm event, time to first episode of self-harm and number of self-harm events over the follow-up period. Secondary outcome measures are length of time from contemplation to act of self-harm, help-seeking behaviour after self-harm, cost, working alliance, engagement with services and perceived coercion. Other outcome variables are quality of life, social impairment and satisfaction with treatment.

Discussion

Results of this trial will help to clarify the potential beneficial effects of JCPs for people with BPD and provide information to design a definitive trial.

Trial Registration

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN12440268

How much do emergency healthcare workers know about capacity and consent?

AIM

To assess knowledge of capacity and consent among emergency healthcare workers.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional survey with a structured questionnaire.

METHODS

86 questionnaires were distributed and completed by 42 accident and emergency doctors, 21 accident and emergency nurses, and 23 emergency ambulance staff. Correct answers on assessing capacity to consent to or refuse treatment were given by 67% of the doctors and 10% of the nurses, but by none of the ambulance workers. 15% of all respondents wrongly believed that an adult who is found to have capacity can lawfully be treated against his or her will.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that emergency healthcare workers do not have adequate knowledge about how to assess capacity and treat people who either refuse treatment or lack capacity. It shows a need for further training among doctors, nurses and ambulance staff working in the emergency setting.

Self-harm, capacity, and refusal of treatment: implications for emergency medical practice. A prospective observational study

OBJECTIVES

In the context of increasing attention to the rights of adults to make treatment decisions for themselves, this study investigated, among patients who have engaged in self-harm (i) the extent of valid decision making; (ii) the impact of mental disorders; and (iii) the effect of systematically providing relevant clinical information.

DESIGN

A prospective observational study.

SETTING

The emergency department of a large teaching hospital in southeast England.

PARTICIPANTS

Seventy one adult men and women who had presented for treatment following self-harm.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Semi-structured interviews were used to make clinical judgements about participants' capacity to consent before, and following, the presentation of simple written information about the proposed treatment(s). Demographic data, and data about mental disorder and alcohol misuse, were also collected.

RESULTS

Based on accepted legal criteria, only 28/71 (39.4%) of the patients were judged to have capacity to consent to the proposed intervention(s) initially. However, the number of patients judged to have capacity improved significantly (p<0.001) after the presentation of written information, to 45/71 (63.4%). Those judged incapable were significantly more likely (p<0.01) to refuse treatment. Continuing incapacity was significantly associated only with cognitive impairment (p<0.001) and/or severe psychiatric disturbance (p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with current views, capacity is not static, even among patients who have engaged in self-harm, but can be improved through a simple intervention. The findings are consistent with recent guidance about supporting this vulnerable group of patients, many of whom are ambivalent about treatment.

An argument for the use of Aristotelian method in bioethics

The main claim of this paper is that the method outlined and used in Aristotle's Ethics is an appropriate and credible one to use in bioethics. Here "appropriate" means that the method is capable of establishing claims and developing concepts in bioethics and "credible" that the method has some plausibility, it is not open to obvious and immediate objection. It begins by suggesting why this claim matters and then gives a brief outline of Aristotle's method. The main argument is made in three stages. First, it is argued that Aristotelian method is credible because it compares favourably with alternatives. In this section it is shown that Aristotelian method is not vulnerable to criticisms that are made both of methods that give a primary place to moral theory (such as utilitarianism) and those that eschew moral theory (such as casuistry and social science approaches). As such, it compares favourably with these other approaches that are vulnerable to at least some of these criticisms. Second, the appropriateness of Aristotelian method is indicated through outlining how it would deal with a particular case. Finally, it is argued that the success of Aristotle's philosophy is suggestive of both the credibility and appropriateness of his method.

Duty of care in the emergency department

This paper explores issues that relate to the management of deliberate self-harm in the emergency department (ED) from a New South Wales perspective. A scenario that is typical to the ED is presented to illustrate the dilemma that nurses face and the implications for clinical practice. Confusion and concern regarding the treatment and detention of this type of patient in the ED can often result in the inappropriate use of the Mental Health Act. It is preferable for clinicians to be aware of the treatment options they have under duty of care rather than relying on the unfounded reassurance provided by scheduling a patient under the Mental Health Act. Communication and negotiation skills are highlighted as attributes that clinicians must develop and enhance to effectively manage difficult presentations to the ED.

Self-harm patients who take early discharge from the accident and emergency department: How do they differ from those who stay?

There is evidence that patients presenting at a hospital Accident and Emergency (A&E) department with self-harm are considerably more likely than many others to discharge themselves before their assessment or treatment are complete. This paper reports a study that is part of a broader analysis of all self-harm presentations to a hospital A&E department over a five-year period. Self-harm patients who chose to remain for assessment and treatment were compared with those who chose to discharge themselves prematurely. We found a mean proportion of 18% of self-harm patients per annum took early discharge between 1996 and 2000 and noted that these patients were more likely than other self-harm patients to have consumed alcohol in the hours immediately prior to their self-harm and attendance at the hospital. Self-harm patients who took early discharge were less likely than other self-harm patients to be admitted to an in-patient bed and less likely to receive a psychosocial assessment from a mental health specialist. We also found that aftercare arrangements were significantly less likely to be made for those patients who took early discharge. Some suggestions are made about approaches that clinical staff could adopt in order to reduce early discharge in self-harm patients.

Capacity to consent: issues and controversies

Capacity to consent has major ethical and legal implications, but it is often poorly understood and inadequately practiced. Varied literature on the subject is reviewed with a view to discuss the legal and clinical aspects and strategies to improve current practice.