1
|
Freeman J, Nikjou D, Maloney J, Covington S, Pew S, Wie C, Strand N, Abd-Elsayed A. The Role of Orthoses in Chronic Axial Spinal Conditions. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2024; 28:501-506. [PMID: 38407764 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-024-01233-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Bracing represents a prevalent conservative, non-surgical approach used in the management of chronic spinal conditions such as spondylosis, degenerative disc disease, and spondylolisthesis. A wide variety of orthoses are available to aid in addressing cervical, thoracic, lumbar, thoracic, and SI joint pain. In this review, we aim to comprehensively examine brace types with their current applications and implications of usage. RECENT FINDINGS There are multiple cervical bracing options, such as soft and rigid collars, to assist in managing acute trauma and chronic degenerative conditions. The review highlights the nuanced decision-making process between hard and soft collars based on the severity of bone or ligamentous injury and neurological findings. Orthoses for low back pain are commonly used. The review highlights the challenges of chronic neck and lower back pain, emphasizing the importance of clinicians exploring all treatment strategies including braces which can improve function and reduce pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Freeman
- Mayo Clinic Department of Anesthesiology, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Devin Nikjou
- Mayo Clinic Department of Anesthesiology, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | | | - Scott Pew
- Mayo Clinic Department of Anesthesiology, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Natalie Strand
- Mayo Clinic Department of Anesthesiology, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Alaa Abd-Elsayed
- Anesthesiology Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen G, Zheng F, Wang Y, Sun Q. Comparison of the clinical effect of cervical spondylotic suspension traction with sitting position and non-surgical spinal decompression system traction in the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy. Minerva Pediatr (Torino) 2024; 76:123-125. [PMID: 37255396 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-5276.23.07299-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Guodong Chen
- Department of Orthopedics, Gansu Provincial Hospital of TCM, Lanzhou, China
| | - Fangjiang Zheng
- Propaganda United Front Department, Gansu Provincial Hospital of TCM, Lanzhou, China
| | - Yawei Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, Gansu Provincial Hospital of TCM, Lanzhou, China -
| | - Qibin Sun
- Outpatient Department, Gansu Provincial Hospital of TCM, Lanzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cine HS. Coexistence of Cervical Disc Herniation and Shoulder Soft Tissue Pathologies and the Effect of Sleeping Positions and Orthopedic Pillows. Cureus 2023; 15:e44510. [PMID: 37662509 PMCID: PMC10474908 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.44510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background/aim This study investigates the degree of coexistence of cervical disc herniation and shoulder soft tissue pathology, as well as the effect of sleeping positions and orthopedic pillow use. Materials and methods This present study was conducted on 72 patients with shoulder/arm pain operated on for cervical disc herniation. Two groups were examined according to the presence of shoulder soft tissue pathology, four common sleeping positions, and the use of an orthopedic pillow. Preoperative and postoperative shoulder/arm visual analog scale (VAS) scores were compared. Results The preoperative VAS values were 7.35, while the postoperative VAS values were 3.32. Twenty-one patients (29.2%) had a disc at the C3-4 level, a rate equal to that for the C5-6 level. Twenty-four patients (33.3%) had a disc at the C4-5 level. Thirty-two cases (44.4%) slept in a side-lying position on the same side as their disc herniation. Among those with a herniated disc at the C3-4 level, 8 (53.3%) preferred sleeping side-lying on the opposite side of the disc. In contrast, those with a herniated disc at the C4-5 level more frequently (40.6%) slept side-lying on the same side as the disc. Mean VAS scores were significantly higher in cases with shoulder soft tissue pathology and were significantly lower in the group that used orthopedic pillows (p<0.001). Conclusion Shoulder soft tissue pathologies should be considered in postoperative shoulder pain. The use of orthopedic pillows is effective in preoperative and postoperative pain. Sleeping positions do not affect the shoulder/arm pain before and after the operation, but they affect the level of cervical disc herniations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hidayet Safak Cine
- Neurosurgery, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Prof. Dr. Suleyman Yalcin City Hospital, Istanbul, TUR
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Maharaj RG, Motilal S, Khan R, Rampersad F. A No-Cost, Bedside, Self-Traction Maneuver for Relief From Chronic Cervical Radiculopathy: A Case Report. Cureus 2023; 15:e43963. [PMID: 37746470 PMCID: PMC10515476 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.43963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Cervical radiculopathy secondary to spondylosis is common in the elderly. Systematic reviews suggest that no single treatment modality represents the standard of care. A no-cost, bedside, self-traction intervention can be a useful adjunct to current options. A 60-year-old South Asian male presented with severe cervical radiculopathic pain in April 2019, proven by magnetic resonance imaging to be secondary to spondylosis. Since late 2019, he has been doing a daily self-traction procedure in which he lies prone with the anterior chest and abdomen flat on a bed, shoulders just off the mattress edge, and arms to the side. The position is maintained for 60 seconds, where the weight of the head provides traction. Overhead cervical traction has not been needed for the past three years, and the pain has been bearable. His Neck Disability Index has decreased from 25 to 2. This no-cost, minute-long daily maneuver has provided relief from chronic cervical neuropathic pain due to cervical spondylosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohan G Maharaj
- Paraclinical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, TTO
| | - Shastri Motilal
- Paraclinical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, TTO
| | - Raveed Khan
- Paraclinical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, TTO
| | - Fidel Rampersad
- Department of Medicine, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, TTO
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Plener J, da Silva-Oolup S, To D, Csiernik B, Hofkirchner C, Cox J, Chow N, Hogg-Johnson S, Ammendolia C. Eligibility Criteria of Participants in Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing Conservative Management of Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2023; 48:E132-E157. [PMID: 36730764 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 08/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Systematic review. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the inclusion and exclusion criteria for participants in randomized control trials (RCTs) assessing conservative management for cervical radiculopathy (CR), to determine if any consensus exists within the literature. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA A 2012 systematic review identified a lack of uniformity for the eligibility criteria of participants in RCTs evaluating conservative interventions for CR. Since then, a large number of RCTs have been published, signaling the need for an updated evaluation of this topic. MATERIALS AND METHODS We electronically searched MEDLINE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Embase, and PsycINFO from inception to June 15, 2022, to identify RCTs assessing conservative management of CR. Information extracted was analyzed to determine the level of homogeneity and/or heterogeneity of the inclusion and exclusion criteria across studies. RESULTS Seventy-six RCTs met our inclusion criteria with 68 distinct trials identified. The inclusion of arm pain with or without another symptom ( i.e. numbness, paresthesia, or weakness) was required in 69.12% of trials, 50% of trials required participants to exhibit neck symptoms, and 73.53% of studies required some form of clinical examination findings, but inconsistencies existed for the number and type of tests used. Furthermore, 41.18% of trials included imaging, with 33.82% of trials requiring magnetic resonance imaging findings. The most common exclusion criteria included were the presence of red flags and cervical myelopathy in 66.18% and 58.82% of trials, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Overall, there is still a lack of uniformity for the inclusion/exclusion criteria of trials assessing the conservative management of CR, with some improvements noted compared with the 2012 review. Based on the current literature assessing the diagnostic utility of clinical symptoms and confirmatory tests, we proposed inclusion criteria for trials assessing conservative interventions. Future research should aim to develop standardized classification criteria to improve consistency among studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Plener
- Division of Graduate Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sophia da Silva-Oolup
- Division of Graduate Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Daphne To
- Department of Clinical Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ben Csiernik
- Department of Undergraduate Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Jocelyn Cox
- Department of Undergraduate Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ngai Chow
- Private Practice, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sheilah Hogg-Johnson
- Department of Research and Innovation, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Oshawa, ON, Canada
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, ON, Canada
| | - Carlo Ammendolia
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Plener J, Csiernik B, To D, da Silva-Oolup S, Hofkirchner C, Cox J, Cancelliere C, Chow N, Hogg-Johnson S, Ammendolia C. Conservative Management of Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review. Clin J Pain 2023; 39:138-146. [PMID: 36599029 DOI: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000001092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness and safety of conservative interventions compared with other interventions, placebo/sham interventions, or no intervention on disability, pain, function, quality of life, and psychological impact in adults with cervical radiculopathy (CR). METHODS We searched MEDLINE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Embase, and PsycINFO from inception to June 15, 2022 to identify studies that were randomized controlled trials, had at least one conservative treatment arm, and diagnosed participants with CR through confirmatory clinical examination and/or diagnostic tests. Studies were appraised using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and the quality of the evidence was rated using the Grades of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. RESULTS Of the 2561 records identified, 59 trials met our inclusion criteria (n = 4108 participants). Due to clinical and statistical heterogeneity, the findings were synthesized narratively. There is very-low certainty evidence supporting the use of acupuncture, prednisolone, cervical manipulation, and low-level laser therapy for pain and disability in the immediate to short-term, and thoracic manipulation and low-level laser therapy for improvements in cervical range of motion in the immediate term. There is low to very-low certainty evidence for multimodal interventions, providing inconclusive evidence for pain, disability, and range of motion. There is inconclusive evidence for pain reduction after conservative management compared with surgery, rated as very-low certainty. DISCUSSION There is a lack of high-quality evidence, limiting our ability to make any meaningful conclusions. As the number of people with CR is expected to increase, there is an urgent need for future research to help address these gaps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Plener
- Division of Graduate Education
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Carol Cancelliere
- Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Canada
| | | | - Sheilah Hogg-Johnson
- Department of Research and Innovation, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health
- Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Canada
| | - Carlo Ammendolia
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto
- Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gebreyohanes A, Erotocritou M, Choi D. Appraising The Evidence for Conservative versus Surgical Management of Motor Deficits in Degenerative Cervical Radiculopathy. Global Spine J 2023; 13:547-562. [PMID: 35708971 PMCID: PMC9972261 DOI: 10.1177/21925682221109562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Systematic review. OBJECTIVES Understanding the prevalence and outcome of motor deficits in degenerative cervical radiculopathy is important to guide management. We compared motor radiculopathy outcomes after conservative and surgical management, a particular focus being painful vs painless radiculopathy. METHODS MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched. We stratified each study cohort into 1 of 6 groups, I-VI, based on whether radiculopathy was painful, painless or unspecified, and whether interventions were surgical or non-surgical. RESULTS Of 10 514 initial studies, 44 matched the selection criteria. Whilst 42 (95.5%) provided baseline motor radiculopathy data, only 22 (50.0%) provided follow-up motor outcomes. Mean baseline prevalence of motor deficits was 39.1% (9.2%-73.3%) in conservative cohorts and 60.5% (18.5%-94.1%) in surgical cohorts. Group VI, 'surgically-managed motor radiculopathy with unclear pain status' had the largest number of cohorts. Conversely, no cohorts were found in Group III, 'conservatively-managed painless motor radiculopathy'. Large disparities in data quality made direct comparison of conservative vs operative management difficult. CONCLUSIONS Overall pre-intervention prevalence of motor deficits in degenerative cervical radiculopathy is 56.4%. Many studies fail to report motor outcomes after intervention, meaning statistical evidence to guide optimal management of motor radiculopathy is currently lacking. Our study highlights the need for more evidence, preferably from a prospective long-term study, to allow direct comparisons of motor outcomes after conservative and surgical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Axumawi Gebreyohanes
- Victor Horsley Department of
Neurosurgery, The National Hospital for Neurology
and Neurosurgery, UK,University College London (UCL)
Medical School, UK,Axumawi Mike Hailu Gebreyohanes, BSc,
Complex Spine Team, Victor Horsley Department of Neurosurgery, The National
Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, United
Kingdom.
| | | | - David Choi
- Victor Horsley Department of
Neurosurgery, The National Hospital for Neurology
and Neurosurgery, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sathe P, Singh S, Sathe A, Kumar DV. Evaluation of functional disability in cervical radiculopathy patients. INDIAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH SCIENCES AND BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH (KLEU) 2023. [DOI: 10.4103/kleuhsj.kleuhsj_163_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
9
|
Yang X, Arts MP, Bartels RHMA, Vleggeert-Lankamp CLA. The type of cervical disc herniation on MRI does not correlate to clinical outcomes. Bone Joint J 2022; 104-B:1242-1248. [PMID: 36317351 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.104b11.bjj-2022-0657.r2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
AIMS The aim of this study was to investigate whether the type of cervical disc herniation influences the severity of symptoms at the time of presentation, and the outcome after surgical treatment. METHODS The type and extent of disc herniation at the time of presentation in 108 patients who underwent anterior discectomy for cervical radiculopathy were analyzed on MRI, using a four-point scale. These were dichotomized into disc bulge and disc herniation groups. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Neck Disability Index (NDI), 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36), and a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain in the neck and arm at baseline and two years postoperatively. The perceived recovery was also assessed at this time. RESULTS At baseline, 46 patients had a disc bulge and 62 had a herniation. There was no significant difference in the mean NDI and SF-36 between the two groups at baseline. Those in the disc bulge group had a mean NDI of 44.6 (SD 15.2) compared with 43.8 (SD 16.0) in the herniation group (p = 0.799), and a mean SF-36 of 59.2 (SD 6.9) compared with 59.4 (SD 7.7) (p = 0.895). Likewise, there was no significant difference in the incidence of disabling arm pain in the disc bulge and herniation groups (84% vs 73%; p = 0.163), and no significant difference in the incidence of disabling neck pain in the two groups (70.5% (n = 31) vs 63% (n = 39); p = 0.491). At two years after surgery, no significant difference was found in any of the clinical parameters between the two groups. CONCLUSION In patients with cervical radiculopathy, the type and extent of disc herniation measured on MRI prior to surgery correlated neither to the severity of the symptoms at presentation, nor to clinical outcomes at two years postoperatively.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(11):1242-1248.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoyu Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Mark P Arts
- Department of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Centre, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Ronald H M A Bartels
- Department of Neurosurgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lam KN, Heneghan NR, Mistry J, Ojoawo AO, Peolsson A, Verhagen AP, Tampin B, Thoomes E, Jull G, Scholten-Peeters GGM, Slater H, Moloney N, Hall T, Dedering Å, Rushton A, Falla D. Classification criteria for cervical radiculopathy: An international e-Delphi study. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2022; 61:102596. [PMID: 35671539 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Revised: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Establishing a set of uniform classification criteria (CC) for cervical radiculopathy (CR) is required to aid future recruitment of homogenous populations to clinical trials. OBJECTIVES To establish expert informed consensus on CC for CR. DESIGN A pre-defined four round e-Delphi study in accordance with the guidance on Conducting and Reporting Delphi Studies. METHODS Individuals with a background in physiotherapy who had authored two or more peer-reviewed publications on CR were invited to participate. The initial round asked opinions on CC for CR. Content analysis was performed on round one output and a list of discrete items were generated forming the round two survey. In rounds two to four, participants were asked to rate the level of importance of each item on a six-point Likert scale. Data were analysed descriptively using median, interquartile range and percentage agreement. Items reaching pre-defined consensus criteria were carried forward to the next round. Items remaining after the fourth round constituted expert consensus on CC for CR. RESULTS Twelve participants participated with one drop out. The final round identified one inclusion CC and 12 exclusion CC. The inclusion CC that remained achieved 82% agreement and was a cluster criterion consisting of radicular pain with arm pain worse than neck pain; paraesthesia or numbness and/or weakness and/or altered reflex; MRI confirmed nerve root compression compatible with clinical findings. CONCLUSIONS The CC identified can be used to inform eligibility criteria for future CR trials although caution should be practiced as consensus on measurement tools requires further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kwun N Lam
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Nicola R Heneghan
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Jai Mistry
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Adesola O Ojoawo
- Department of Medical Rehabilitation, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences College of Health Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile Ife, Nigeria
| | - Anneli Peolsson
- Dep. Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Unit of Physiotherapy Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Arianne P Verhagen
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Brigitte Tampin
- Faculty of Business Management and Social Sciences, Hochschule Osnabrueck, University of Applied Sciences, Osnabrück, Germany; Department of Physiotherapy, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia; Curtin Allied School of Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | - Erik Thoomes
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Gwendolen Jull
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Australia; Department of Health, Medicine and Rehabilitation, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Norrbotten County, Sweden
| | - Gwendolyne G M Scholten-Peeters
- Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Helen Slater
- Curtin Allied School of Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | - Niamh Moloney
- Department of Medicine, Health and Human Performance, Macquarie University, Australia; THRIVE Physiotherapy, Guernsey
| | - Toby Hall
- Curtin Allied School of Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | - Åsa Dedering
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Alison Rushton
- School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, Canada
| | - Deborah Falla
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Review of Periscapular and Upper Back Pain in the Athlete Current PM&R Reports—Sports Section. CURRENT PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION REPORTS 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s40141-022-00361-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
12
|
What is success of treatment? Expected outcome scores in cervical radiculopathy patients were much higher than the previously reported cut-off values for success. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2022; 31:2761-2768. [PMID: 35551484 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07234-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Revised: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/17/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Treatment success can be defined by asking a patient how they perceive their condition compared to prior to treatment, but it can also be defined by establishing success criteria in advance. We evaluated treatment outcome expectations in patients undergoing surgery or non-operative treatment for cervical radiculopathy. METHODS The first 100 consecutive patients from an ongoing randomized controlled trial (NCT03674619) comparing the effectiveness of surgical and nonsurgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy were included. Patient-reported outcome measures and expected outcome and improvement were obtained before treatment. We compared these with previously published cut-off values for success. Arm pain, neck pain and headache were measured by a numeric rating scale. Neck disability index (NDI) was used to record pain-related disability. We applied Wilcoxon signed-rank test to compare the expected outcome scores for the two treatments. RESULTS Patients reported mean NDI of 42.2 (95% CI 39.6-44.7) at baseline. The expected mean NDI one year after the treatment was 4 (95% CI 3.0-5.1). The expected mean reduction in NDI was 38.3 (95% CI 35.8-40.8). Calculated as a percentage change score, the patients expected a mean reduction of 91.2% (95% CI 89.2-93.2). Patient expectations were higher regarding surgical treatment for arm pain, neck pain and working ability, P < 0.001, but not for headache. CONCLUSIONS The expected improvement after treatment of cervical radiculopathy was much higher than the previously reported cut-off values for success. Patients with cervical radiculopathy had higher expectations to surgical treatment.
Collapse
|
13
|
Thoomes E, Thoomes-de Graaf M, Cleland JA, Gallina A, Falla D. Timing of Evidence-Based Nonsurgical Interventions as Part of Multimodal Treatment Guidelines for the Management of Cervical Radiculopathy: A Delphi Study. Phys Ther 2022; 102:6506308. [PMID: 35079842 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzab312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Revised: 10/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Conservative management of cervical radiculopathy (CR) is a first treatment option because the risk-benefit ratio for surgery is less favorable. Systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines reporting on the effectiveness of nonsurgical management have not considered the timing of management. The aim of this study was to establish consensus on effective nonsurgical treatment modalities at different stages (ie, acute, subacute, or chronic) of CR using the Delphi method approach. METHODS Through an iterative multistage process, experts within the field rated their agreement with a list of proposed treatment modalities according to the stage of CR and could suggest missing treatment modalities. Agreement was measured using a 5-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics were used to measure agreement (median, interquartile ranges, and percentage of agreement). Consensus criteria were defined a priori for each round. Consensus for Round 3 was based on ≥2 of the following: a median Likert scale value of ≥4, interquartile range value of ≤1, and/or a percentage of agreement ≥70%. RESULTS Data analysis produced a consensus list of effective treatment modalities in different stages of recovery. CONCLUSION According to experts, the focus of multimodal management in the acute stage should consist of patient education and spinal manipulative therapy, specific (foraminal opening) exercises, and sustained pain-relieving positions. In the subacute stage, increasing individualized physical activity including supervised motor control, specific exercises, and/or neurodynamic mobilization could be added. In the chronic stage, focus should shift to include general aerobic exercise as well as focused strength training. Postural education and vocational ergonomic assessment should also be considered. IMPACT Multimodal conservative management of individuals with CR should take the stage of the condition into consideration. The focus of therapeutic interventions should shift from passive pain-relieving intervention in the acute stage to increasingly more individualized physical activity and self-management in the chronic stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik Thoomes
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Fysio-Experts, Research Department, Hazerswoude, the Netherlands
| | | | - Joshua A Cleland
- Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alessio Gallina
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Deborah Falla
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Alshami AM, Bamhair DA. Effect of manual therapy with exercise in patients with chronic cervical radiculopathy: a randomized clinical trial. Trials 2021; 22:716. [PMID: 34663421 PMCID: PMC8525034 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05690-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research that has examined the effects of cervical spine mobilization on hypoesthesia and hypersensitivity characteristics in patients with cervical radiculopathy is scarce. The aim of this study was to examine the short-term effects of vertebral mobilization on the sensory features in patients with cervical radiculopathy. METHODS Twenty-eight participants with chronic cervical radiculopathy were randomly allocated to (1) an experimental group [cervical vertebral mobilization technique and exercise] or (2) a comparison group [minimal superficial circular pressure on the skin and exercise]. Participants received a total of 6 sessions for 3-5 weeks. Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), pressure pain threshold (PPT), heat/cold pain threshold (HPT/CPT), and active cervical range of motion (ROM) were measured at baseline immediately after the first session and after the sixth session. RESULTS The experimental group showed improvements from baseline to session 6 in NPRS [mean difference 2.6; 95% confidence interval: -4.6, -0.7], NDI [14; -23.3, -4.3], and active cervical ROM in extension [14°; 2.3, 25.5], rotation [16°; 8.8, 22.5], and lateral flexion to the affected side [10°; 2.3, 16.8]. Improvements were also found in PPT at the neck [124 kPa; 57, 191.1] and C7 level at the hand [99 kPa; 3.6, 194.9]. There were no changes in the HPT and CPT at any tested area (P>0.050). CONCLUSIONS Cervical vertebral mobilization for patients with chronic cervical radiculopathy reduced localized mechanical, but not thermal, pain hypersensitivity. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03328351 ). Registered on November 1, 2017, retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali M Alshami
- Department of Physical Therapy, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Duaa A Bamhair
- Department of Physical Therapy, East Jeddah Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Beckworth WJ, Abramoff BA, Bailey IM, Yoon S, Umpierrez M, Kakarala A, Lee JY, Ward LA, Dows-Martinez MN, Yoon ST. Acute Cervical Radiculopathy Outcomes: Soft Disc Herniations vs Osteophytes. PAIN MEDICINE 2021; 22:561-566. [PMID: 33225358 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnaa341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Prospectively evaluate the clinical outcomes of acute cervical radiculopathy with respect to soft disc herniations vs osteophytes. METHODS Sixty consecutive patients who had had cervical radiculopathy for ≤1 month were enrolled in the study. Inclusion criteria were radicular pain greater than axial pain and a pain score ≥4 out of 10 on a numerical rating scale. Patients had at least one positive clinical finding: motor, sensory, or reflex changes. Plain films and magnetic resonance imaging were ordered. Follow-up was at 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months. Outcomes included pain scores (neck and upper limb), neck disability index, medication use, opioid use, and need for surgery. Two attending musculoskeletal radiologists reviewed imaging findings for osteophytes vs soft disc herniations at the symptomatic level. RESULTS More than 75% reduction in pain was seen in 77% of patients with soft disc herniations and 66% of patients with osteophytes (P > 0.05) at 12 months. A pain score ≤2 out of 10 within 6 to 12 months was seen in 86% of patients with soft disc herniations and 81% of patients with osteophytes (P > 0.05). Moderate or marked improvement at 12 months was seen in 85% of patients with soft discs and 77% of patients with osteophytes (P > 0.05). Baseline-to-12-month numerical rating scale pain scores of patients with soft discs vs osteophytes had overlapping confidence intervals at each follow-up. At 12 months, very few had undergone surgery (7% of patients with soft discs, 11% of patients with osteophytes; P > 0.05) or were on opioids (7% of patients with soft discs, 9% of patients with osteophytes; P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The majority of patients, but not all patients, with acute radiculopathies improved with time. This was seen with both soft disc herniations and osteophytes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Laura A Ward
- National Spine and Pain Centers, USA.,Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, USA
| | | | - S Tim Yoon
- Emory University, Emory Spine Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kang KC, Lee HS, Lee JH. Cervical Radiculopathy Focus on Characteristics and Differential Diagnosis. Asian Spine J 2020; 14:921-930. [PMID: 33373515 PMCID: PMC7788378 DOI: 10.31616/asj.2020.0647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Cervical radiculopathy is characterized by neurological dysfunction caused by compression and inflammation of the spinal nerves or nerve roots of the cervical spine. It mainly presents with neck and arm pain, sensory loss, motor dysfunction, and reflex changes according to the dermatomal distribution. The most common causes of cervical radiculopathy are cervical disc herniation and cervical spondylosis. It is important to find the exact symptomatic segment and distinguish between conditions that may mimic certain cervical radicular compression syndromes through meticulous physical examinations and precise reading of radiographs. Non-surgical treatments are recommended as an initial management. Surgery is applicable to patients with intractable or persistent pain despite sufficient conservative management or with severe or progressive neurological deficits. Cervical radiculopathy is treated surgically by anterior and/or posterior approaches. The appropriate choice of surgical treatment should be individualized, considering the patient’s main pathophysiology, specific clinical symptoms and radiographic findings thoroughly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyung-Chung Kang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hee Sung Lee
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung-Hee Lee
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
The Effects of Exercise Dosage on Neck-Related Pain and Disability: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2020; 50:607-621. [PMID: 33131392 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2020.9155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To (1) evaluate whether exercise therapy is effective for managing neck pain, and (2) investigate the relationship between exercise therapy dosage and treatment effect. DESIGN Intervention systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression. LITERATURE SEARCH An electronic search of 6 databases was completed for trials assessing the effects of exercise therapy on neck pain. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomized controlled trials that compared exercise therapy to a no-exercise therapy control for treating neck pain. Two reviewers screened and selected studies, extracted outcomes, assessed article risk of bias, and rated the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. DATA SYNTHESIS Data were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. We used meta-regression to analyze the effect of exercise dosage on neck pain and disability. RESULTS Fourteen trials were included in the review. Seven trials were at high risk of bias, 4 were at unclear risk of bias, and 3 were at low risk of bias. Exercise therapy was superior to control for reducing pain (visual analog scale mean difference, -15.32 mm) and improving disability (Neck Disability Index mean difference, -3.64 points). Exercise dosage parameters did not predict pain or disability outcomes. CONCLUSION Exercise was beneficial for reducing pain and disability, regardless of exercise therapy dosage. Therefore, optimal exercise dosage recommendations remain unknown. We encourage clinicians to use exercise when managing mechanical neck pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2020;50(11):607-621. doi:10.2519/jospt.2020.9155.
Collapse
|
18
|
Hagan CR, Anderson AR. Cervical spine thrust and non-thrust mobilization for the management of recalcitrant C6 paresthesias associated with a cervical radiculopathy: a case report. Physiother Theory Pract 2020; 38:1311-1318. [PMID: 32896223 DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2020.1818340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The conservative management of cervical radiculopathy is supported by moderate evidence to include interventions such as manual therapy, traction, and therapeutic exercise. There is sparse evidence, however, to support specific manual therapy techniques, particularly thrust manipulation. CASE DESCRIPTION A 35-year-old male presented to physical therapy with a clinical diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy. He complained of neck and upper arm pain with 1st and 2nd digit paresthesias. He was initially managed with repeated movements that restored the cervical range of motion and centralized neck and upper arm pain. Non-thrust upslope joint mobilizations resulted in improved sensation detection in the hand, but the paresthesias did not completely resolve. Immediately following cervical spine upslope thrust manipulation, symptoms fully resolved. Outcomes: The patient fully returned to prior level of function. His DASH score reduced from 40/100 to 2/100, PSFS improved from 1.66/10 to 9.66/10, and he reported to be 'a great deal better' on the GROC. DISCUSSION This case demonstrates the safe and effective utilization of cervical spine thrust manipulation and non-thrust mobilization in the management of a patient with cervical radiculopathy with lingering paresthesias in the distal upper extremity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher R Hagan
- OMPT Fellowship, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.,Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Alexandra R Anderson
- OMPT Fellowship, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.,UI Health, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pilato F, Calandrelli R, Distefano M, Tamburrelli FC. Multidimensional assessment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients. Usefulness of a comprehensive score system. Neurol Sci 2020; 42:1507-1514. [PMID: 32885391 PMCID: PMC7956005 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-020-04691-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2020] [Accepted: 08/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is caused by cervical spine degeneration and surgery may be beneficial, but selection for surgery might be challenging. We performed a multimodal analysis to assess predicting factors that may be useful to help surgeons in this choice. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively evaluated clinical, motor evoked potentials (MEP), and MRI data of patients who undergone surgery for CSM. Seventy-six consecutive patients (46 males) were enrolled. The median age was 65.5 [IQR: 57-71] years, and the duration of symptoms was 11 [8-13] months. A multivariate analysis in order to assess predictors of outcome and ROC curve analysis were performed. RESULTS Thirty patients (M:18, 39.5%) gained 6 or more points on mJOA and they were collected in good recovery group, whereas 46 patients (60.5%, M:28) showed a fair recovery. We developed a comprehensive score system (CSS) taking into account clinical, neurophysiological, and neuroradiological data. ROC curve analysis was performed to determine the discriminative power of four models derived from the multivariate logistic regression analysis for predictors of good outcome considering only clinical variables, MRI variables, and MEP variables or considering the comprehensive model, demonstrating a good accuracy of CSS model to predict outcome. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates that CSS model taking into consideration functional assessment by mJOA score, neurologic evaluation, cervical MRI, and MEP may be a feasible method to predict outcome in patients candidate to surgery, supporting surgeon's decisions both for those patients candidate to surgery and for patients in whom a "wait and see" approach could be proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Pilato
- UOC Neurologia, Dipartimento di scienze dell'invecchiamento, neurologiche, ortopediche e della testa-collo, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli - IRCCS, 00168, Rome, Italy.
| | - Rosalinda Calandrelli
- UOC Radiologia e Neuroradiologia, Dipartimento di diagnostica per immagini, radioterapia oncologica ed ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli - IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Marisa Distefano
- UOC Neurologia e UTN, Ospedale Belcolle, Strada Sammartinese, 01100, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Francesco Ciro Tamburrelli
- UOC Chirurgia Vertebrale, Dipartimento di scienze dell'invecchiamento, neurologiche, ortopediche e della testa-collo, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli - IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Istituto di Ortopedia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Jesson T, Runge N, Schmid AB. Physiotherapy for people with painful peripheral neuropathies: a narrative review of its efficacy and safety. Pain Rep 2020; 5:e834. [PMID: 33490836 PMCID: PMC7808681 DOI: 10.1097/pr9.0000000000000834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2020] [Revised: 05/28/2020] [Accepted: 06/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Pharmacological treatment for peripheral neuropathic pain has only modest effects and is often limited by serious adverse responses. Alternative treatment approaches including physiotherapy management have thus gained interest in the management of people with peripheral neuropathies. This narrative review summarises the current literature on the efficacy and safety of physiotherapy to reduce pain and disability in people with radicular pain and chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, 2 common peripheral neuropathies. For chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, the current evidence based on 8 randomised controlled trials suggests that exercise may reduce symptoms in patients with established neuropathy, but there is a lack of evidence for its preventative effect in patients who do not yet have symptoms. For radicular pain, most of the 21 trials investigated interventions targeted at improving motor control or reducing neural mechanosensitivity. The results were equivocal, with some indication that neural tissue management may show some benefits in reducing pain. Adverse events to physiotherapy seemed rare; however, these were not consistently reported across all studies. Although it is encouraging to see that the evidence base for physiotherapy in the treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain is growing steadily, the mixed quality of available studies currently prevents firm treatment recommendations. Based on promising preliminary data, suggestions are made on potential directions to move the field forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Jesson
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nils Runge
- Connect Health, Benton Lane, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom
| | - Annina B. Schmid
- Nuffield Department for Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Taso M, Sommernes JH, Kolstad F, Sundseth J, Bjorland S, Pripp AH, Zwart JA, Brox JI. A randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of surgical and nonsurgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2020; 21:171. [PMID: 32178655 PMCID: PMC7076994 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-3188-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2019] [Accepted: 03/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cervical radiculopathy is usually caused by disc herniation or spondylosis. The prognosis is expected to be good in most patients, but there is limited scientific evidence on the indications for nonsurgical and surgical treatments. The aim of the present study is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of surgical and nonsurgical treatment in two trials – including disc herniation and spondylosis, respectively, and to evaluate factors that contribute to better decision making. Methods/design Patients with disabling radicular arm pain and MRI-proven cervical disc herniation or spondylosis will be randomised to receive nonsurgical or surgical treatment. The follow-up period is one year and the sample size is estimated to be 50 for each arm in the two trials, giving a total of 200 patients. The primary outcomes are the Neck Disability Index and arm pain. Secondary outcomes include neck pain; EQ-5D and costs to evaluate cost-effectiveness; prognostic factors; CT and MRI scans, to estimate intervertebral foraminal area and nerve root compression; and the expected minimal improvement for willingness to undergo treatment. Discussion The outcomes of this study will contribute to better decision making in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy. Trial registration This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03674619, on September 17, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirad Taso
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital HF, Ullevål, Postboks 4956, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway. .,Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway. .,Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Jon Håvard Sommernes
- Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Frode Kolstad
- Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jarle Sundseth
- Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Siri Bjorland
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital HF, Ullevål, Postboks 4956, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway
| | - Are Hugo Pripp
- Oslo Centre of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Research Support Services, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - John Anker Zwart
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Research and Communication Unit for Musculoskeletal Health, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jens Ivar Brox
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital HF, Ullevål, Postboks 4956, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
Neck pain is the fourth leading cause of disability. Acute neck pain largely resolves within 2 months. History and physical examination play a key role in ruling out some of the more serious causes for neck pain. The evidence for pharmacologic interventions for acute and chronic musculoskeletal neck pain is limited. Lower back pain is the leading cause of disability and productivity loss. Consultation with a physical medicine and rehabilitation spine specialist within 48 hours for acute pain and within 10 days for all patients with lower back pain may significantly decrease rate of surgical interventions and increase patient satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian Popescu
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, 1800 Lombard Street, Philadelphia, PA 19146, USA.
| | - Haewon Lee
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California San Diego, 200 West Arbor Drive, #8894, San Diego, CA 92103, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wendahl A, Abd-Elsayed A. Cervical Spondylosis. PRACTICAL CHRONIC PAIN MANAGEMENT 2020:59-64. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-46675-6_9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
|
24
|
Yuan H, Zhang X, Zhang LM, Yan YQ, Liu YK, Lewandrowski KU. Comparative study of curative effect of spinal endoscopic surgery and anterior cervical decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY 2020; 6:S186-S196. [PMID: 32195427 DOI: 10.21037/jss.2019.11.15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of endoscopic cervical spinal surgery with anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Methods A total of forty-six CSM patients who were admitted to the Medical School of Chinese PLA and treated with endoscopic spine surgery or ACDF from January 2015 to June 2017 were collected. The patients were divided into the spinal endoscopy group and the ACDF group, according to the operation methods. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss and hospitalization stay of the two groups were recorded and compared. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score before operation, three months, and one year after operation were recorded for intra-group and inter-group comparison. The improvement rates of JOA were compared between the two groups to evaluate the clinical efficacy. Results There were twenty-two cases in the spinal endoscopy group and twenty-four cases in the ACDF group. The mean operation lasting time, intraoperative blood loss and hospitalization stay in the spinal endoscopy group were significantly lower than those in the ACDF group (P<0.05). The postoperative JOA score of the two groups were significantly higher than those before the operation (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the JOA score before operation, three months and one year after operation between the two groups (P>0.05). The improvement rates in the spinal endoscopy group were not significantly different compared to those in the ACDF group (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the excellent rate (81.8% vs. 83.3%) between the spinal endoscopy group and the ACDF group (P>0.05). Conclusions The short-term efficacy of spinal endoscopic surgery and ACDF was equal in the treatment of CSM. The spinal endoscopic surgery was significantly superior to ACDF in reducing the operation time, the intraoperative blood loss and the hospitalization stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heng Yuan
- Department of Orthopaedics, No. 2 Affiliated Hospital, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China
| | - Xifeng Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, First Medical Center, PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Lei-Ming Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, the Sixth Medical Center, PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100048, China
| | - Yu-Qiu Yan
- Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery, Beijing Yuhe Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Rehabilitation Hospital, Beijing 100039, China
| | - Yan-Kang Liu
- Department of Orthopaedics, No. 2 Affiliated Hospital, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China
| | - Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski
- Center for Advanced Spine Care of Southern Arizona and Surgical Institute of Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA.,Department Neurosurgery, UNIRIO, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.,Department of Orthopaedics, Fundación Universitaria Sanitas, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Liang L, Feng M, Cui X, Zhou S, Yin X, Wang X, Yang M, Liu C, Xie R, Zhu L, Yu J, Wei X. The effect of exercise on cervical radiculopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98:e17733. [PMID: 31702624 PMCID: PMC6855577 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000017733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cervical radiculopathy (CR), which is most often stems from degenerative disease in the cervical spine, has increasingly become a common and frequently occurring disease in clinic due to the popularity of electronic products, such as computes and cell phones. Some studies have shown that exercise or exercise combined with other treatments can effectively decrease pain and improve functional status. The objective was to analyze the effects of exercise for treating patients with CR. METHODS Seven databases were searched from inception to December 2018. Randomized controlled trials involving exercise alone or exercise combined with conventional treatment were enrolled. Data were pooled after trials quality assessment for meta-analysis. Outcomes were pain (visual analog scale [VAS]), quality of life (12-short form health survey, 36-short form health survey), and physical function accessed by neck disability index (NDI). RESULTS Ten studies involving 871 participants with CR were included. Meta-analysis revealed that compared with control group, there was a reduction in VAS (standardized mean difference = -0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.34 to -0.44; Z = 3.89; P < .001). There was also an improvement of NDI (mean difference = -3.60; 95% CI: -6.27 to -0.94; Z = 2.65; P = .008)]. Additionally, although the results of subgroup analyses were changed due to the paucity of the quantity and quality of the included studies. The pooled results were verified to be stable by sensitivity analyses. Besides, the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation level of evidence is low for each outcome. CONCLUSION Exercise alone or exercise plus other treatment may be helpful to patients with CR. However, exercise option should be carefully considered for each patient with CR in accordance with their different situations. Large-scale studies using proper methodology are recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Long Liang
- Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Chaoyang District
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Orthopedics of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing
| | - Minshan Feng
- Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Chaoyang District
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Orthopedics of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing
| | - Xin Cui
- Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Chaoyang District
| | - Shuaiqi Zhou
- Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Chaoyang District
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Orthopedics of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing
| | - Xunlu Yin
- Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Chaoyang District
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Orthopedics of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing
| | - Xingyu Wang
- First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Chinese Medicine
| | - Mao Yang
- First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Chinese Medicine
| | - Cunhuan Liu
- Jinzhai County Chinese Medicine Hospital, Anhui, China
| | - Rong Xie
- Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Chaoyang District
| | - Liguo Zhu
- Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Chaoyang District
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Orthopedics of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing
| | - Jie Yu
- Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Chaoyang District
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Orthopedics of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing
| | - Xu Wei
- Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Chaoyang District
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Orthopedics of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Cook JA, Julious SA, Sones W, Hampson LV, Hewitt C, Berlin JA, Ashby D, Emsley R, Fergusson DA, Walters SJ, Wilson EC, MacLennan G, Stallard N, Rothwell JC, Bland M, Brown L, Ramsay CR, Cook A, Armstrong D, Altman D, Vale LD. Practical help for specifying the target difference in sample size calculations for RCTs: the DELTA 2 five-stage study, including a workshop. Health Technol Assess 2019; 23:1-88. [PMID: 31661431 PMCID: PMC6843113 DOI: 10.3310/hta23600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The randomised controlled trial is widely considered to be the gold standard study for comparing the effectiveness of health interventions. Central to its design is a calculation of the number of participants needed (the sample size) for the trial. The sample size is typically calculated by specifying the magnitude of the difference in the primary outcome between the intervention effects for the population of interest. This difference is called the 'target difference' and should be appropriate for the principal estimand of interest and determined by the primary aim of the study. The target difference between treatments should be considered realistic and/or important by one or more key stakeholder groups. OBJECTIVE The objective of the report is to provide practical help on the choice of target difference used in the sample size calculation for a randomised controlled trial for researchers and funder representatives. METHODS The Difference ELicitation in TriAls2 (DELTA2) recommendations and advice were developed through a five-stage process, which included two literature reviews of existing funder guidance and recent methodological literature; a Delphi process to engage with a wider group of stakeholders; a 2-day workshop; and finalising the core document. RESULTS Advice is provided for definitive trials (Phase III/IV studies). Methods for choosing the target difference are reviewed. To aid those new to the topic, and to encourage better practice, 10 recommendations are made regarding choosing the target difference and undertaking a sample size calculation. Recommended reporting items for trial proposal, protocols and results papers under the conventional approach are also provided. Case studies reflecting different trial designs and covering different conditions are provided. Alternative trial designs and methods for choosing the sample size are also briefly considered. CONCLUSIONS Choosing an appropriate sample size is crucial if a study is to inform clinical practice. The number of patients recruited into the trial needs to be sufficient to answer the objectives; however, the number should not be higher than necessary to avoid unnecessary burden on patients and wasting precious resources. The choice of the target difference is a key part of this process under the conventional approach to sample size calculations. This document provides advice and recommendations to improve practice and reporting regarding this aspect of trial design. Future work could extend the work to address other less common approaches to the sample size calculations, particularly in terms of appropriate reporting items. FUNDING Funded by the Medical Research Council (MRC) UK and the National Institute for Health Research as part of the MRC-National Institute for Health Research Methodology Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan A Cook
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Steven A Julious
- Medical Statistics Group, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - William Sones
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Lisa V Hampson
- Statistical Methodology and Consulting, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Catherine Hewitt
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Deborah Ashby
- Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Richard Emsley
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Dean A Fergusson
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Stephen J Walters
- Medical Statistics Group, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Edward Cf Wilson
- Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research, Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Health Economics Group, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Graeme MacLennan
- Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Nigel Stallard
- Warwick Medical School, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Joanne C Rothwell
- Medical Statistics Group, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Martin Bland
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Louise Brown
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Craig R Ramsay
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Andrew Cook
- Wessex Institute, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - David Armstrong
- School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Douglas Altman
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Luke D Vale
- Health Economics Group, Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Surgery for degenerative cervical spine disease in Finland, 1999-2015. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2019; 161:2147-2159. [PMID: 31154519 PMCID: PMC6739276 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-019-03958-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2018] [Accepted: 05/24/2019] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Background The incidence of surgery for degenerative cervical spine disease (DCSD) has risen by almost 150% in the USA in the last three decades and stabilized at slightly over 70 operations/100,000 people. There has been significant regional variation in the operation incidences. We aim to assess the diagnosis-based, age-adjusted trends in the operation incidences and the regional variation in Finland between 1999 and 2015. Methods Data from the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register (FHDR), the Cause of Death Register, and the registers of the Social Insurance Institution were combined to analyze all the primary operations for DCSD or rheumatoid atlanto-axial subluxation (rAAS). Combinations of the operative and the diagnosis codes were used to classify the patients into five diagnostic groups. Results A total of 19,701 primary operations were included. The age-adjusted operation incidence rose from 21.0 to 36.5/100,000 people between 1999 and 2013 and plateaued thereafter. The incidence of surgery for radiculopathy increased from 13.1 to 23.3 operations/100,000 people, and the incidence of surgery for DCM increased from 5.8 to 7.0 operations/100,000 people. The rise was especially pronounced in surgery for foraminal stenosis, which increased from 5.3 to 12.4 operations/100,000 people. Of the five diagnostic groups, only operations for rAAS declined. Operations increased especially in the 40- to 65-year-old age group. The overall operation incidences varied from 18.3 to 43.1 operations/100,000 people between the university hospitals. Conclusions The age-adjusted incidence of surgery for DCSD has risen in Finland by 76%, but the rise has plateaued. Surgery for radiculopathy, especially for foraminal stenosis, increased more steeply than surgery for degenerative medullopathy, with vast regional differences in the operation incidences. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00701-019-03958-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
28
|
A randomised controlled trial of multimodal physiotherapy versus advice for recent onset, painful cervical radiculopathy - the PACeR trial protocol. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019; 20:265. [PMID: 31153362 PMCID: PMC6545204 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2639-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2019] [Accepted: 05/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A research gap exists for optimal management of cervical radiculopathy in the first 12 weeks and short term natural history of the condition is somewhat unclear, although thought to be favourable. The primary aim of this assessor blinded, superiority, 2 parallel group randomised controlled trial is to investigate the effects of a 4 week physiotherapy programme (6-8 sessions) of manual therapy, exercise and upper limb neural unloading tape, compared to a control of weekly phone advice; on disability, pain and selected biopsychosocial measures, in acute and sub-acute cervical radiculopathy patients. A secondary aim is to identify whether any baseline variables, symptom duration or group allocation can predict outcome. METHODS Participants are recruited from GP referrals in an urban setting, from a neurosurgery non-urgent waiting list and from self-referral through Facebook advertising. Eligible participants (n = 64) are diagnosed with radiculopathy based on a clinical prediction rule and must have symptoms of unilateral, single level, radiculopathy for between 2 and 12 weeks, without having yet received physiotherapy. Random 1:1 group allocation (using variable block sizes), allocation concealment, blinded assessment and intention to treat analysis are being employed. Treatment is provided by clinical specialist physiotherapists in primary and secondary care settings. Outcomes are measured at baseline, 4 (primary endpoint) and 12 weeks. Participants' report of pain, disability and their rating of recovery is also recorded by telephone interview at 6 months. Statistical analysis of between group differences will be performed with ANOVAs and MANOVAs, and multivariable regression analysis will be undertaken to explore predictor variables. Ethical approval for this study has been received from the Beaumont Hospital and Irish College of General Practitioners Research Ethics Committees. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02449200). DISCUSSION An internal pilot study to test retention and recruitment strategies led to trial expansion and this is now a multi centre trial involving 5 clinical sites. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT02449200 . Registered 20/05/15.
Collapse
|
29
|
Cervical radiculopathy and cervical myelopathy: diagnosis and management in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2019; 68:44-46. [PMID: 29284641 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp17x694361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2017] [Accepted: 09/01/2017] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
|
30
|
Gärtner FR, Marinus J, van den Hout WB, Vleggeert-Lankamp C, Stiggelbout AM. The Cervical Radiculopathy Impact Scale: development and evaluation of a new functional outcome measure for cervical radicular syndrome. Disabil Rehabil 2019; 42:1894-1905. [PMID: 30686066 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1534996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To develop and validate an outcome scale for the cervical radicular syndrome and to build a mapping, predicting EQ-5D utility from the new scale.Study design and setting: An item pool was developed based on literature and patient and clinician interviews. Item selection was based on symptomatology, factor analysis, and internal consistency. We assessed: (a) test-retest reliability by standard error of measurement and intraclass correlation coefficients; (b) construct validity by testing 22 hypotheses on relationships with existing measures and known-group differences. For the mapping, performance was assessed by mean absolute error and root mean squared error.Results: A total of 254 patients with cervical radicular syndrome completed the first questionnaire, 61 stable patients a retest. Item selection led to a 21-item questionnaire consisting of three subscales: Symptoms, Energy and postures, and Actions and activities. Standard error of measurement values ranged from 6.7 to 11.2 on a 0 to 100 scale. All subscales showed good reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients: 0.84, 0.87, and 0.94). All hypotheses for construct validity were confirmed. A linear utility mapping was preferred, with reasonable statistical performance.Conclusion: We developed a reliable and valid cervical radicular syndrome specific outcome scale, called the Cervical Radiculopathy Impact Scale (CRIS). This new questionnaire may facilitate (cost-)effectiveness studies in this field.Implications for RehabilitationThe cervical radicular syndrome is a frequently occurring and invalidating health problem, which causes severe radiating pain in the arm and/or hand, which can be accompanied by motor and/or sensory deficits.The Cervical Radiculopathy Impact Scale (CRIS) is a newly developed self-report questionnaire which covers measurement of symptoms and limitations in patients with cervical radiculopathy due to irradiating pain, tingling sensations and sensory loss in the arm in combination with neck disability.The CRIS consists of 21 items divided over three subscales: (i) symptoms, (ii) energy and postures, and (iii) actions and activities.The CRIS shows good content validity, test-retest reliability, construct validity and is able to discriminate between groups.The CRIS predicts EQ-5D utility and is therefore useful for (cost)effectiveness studies in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fania R Gärtner
- Department of Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Johan Marinus
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Wilbert B van den Hout
- Department of Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Anne M Stiggelbout
- Department of Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Zhang X, Zhang Z, Wen J, Lu J, Sun Y, Sang D. The effectiveness of therapeutic strategies for patients with radiculopathy: A network meta-analysis. Mol Pain 2018; 14:1744806918768972. [PMID: 29651898 PMCID: PMC5900815 DOI: 10.1177/1744806918768972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives The aim of this network meta-analysis is to assess the effectiveness of therapeutic strategies for patients with radiculopathy, including physical, medical, surgical, and other therapies. Methods We electronically searched electronic databases including PubMed and Embase for randomized controlled trials. The response rate and visual analog scale of pain change were considered as primary outcomes. The outcomes were measured by odds ratio (OR) value and corresponding 95% credible intervals (CrIs) or standardized mean difference (MD) with 95% CrIs. Besides, surface under cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) were performed to rank efficacy and safety of treatments on each end points. Results A total of 16 eligible studies with 1071 subjects were included in this analysis. Our results showed that corticosteroid was significantly more effective than control regarding the response rate (OR = 3.86, 95% CrI: 1.16, 12.55). Surgery had a better performance in pain change compared with control (MD = −1.92, 95% CrI: −3.58, −0.15). According to the SUCRA results, corticosteroid, collar, and physiotherapy ranked the highest concerning response rate (SUCRA = 0.656, 0.652, and 0.610, respectively). Surgery, traction, and corticosteroid were superior to others in pain change (SUCRA = 0.866, 0.748, and 0.589, respectively). Conclusion According to the network meta-analysis result, we recommended surgery as the optimal treatment for radiculopathy patients; traction and corticosteroids were also recommended for their beneficial interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoyu Zhang
- 1 Department of General Rehabilitation, Capital Medical University School of Rehabilitation Medicine, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing Boai Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhiqiang Zhang
- 2 Community Chronic Disease Research Center, Institute of Chinese Basic Clinical Medicine, 71046 China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences , Beijing, China
| | - Jianzhong Wen
- 3 Department of Anesthesiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Jie Lu
- 4 Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yingchun Sun
- 5 Chinese Medicine Treatment Center, Capital Medical University School of Rehabilitation Medicine, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing Boai Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Dechun Sang
- 1 Department of General Rehabilitation, Capital Medical University School of Rehabilitation Medicine, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing Boai Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ilkevitch A, Lawler T, Rindfleisch JA. Neck Pain. Integr Med (Encinitas) 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-35868-2.00068-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
33
|
Thoomes EJ, van Geest S, van der Windt DA, Falla D, Verhagen AP, Koes BW, Thoomes-de Graaf M, Kuijper B, Scholten-Peeters WGM, Vleggeert-Lankamp CL. Value of physical tests in diagnosing cervical radiculopathy: a systematic review. Spine J 2018; 18:179-189. [PMID: 28838857 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.08.241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2017] [Revised: 08/07/2017] [Accepted: 08/15/2017] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT In clinical practice, the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy is based on information from the patient's history, physical examination, and diagnostic imaging. Various physical tests may be performed, but their diagnostic accuracy is unknown. PURPOSE This study aimed to summarize and update the evidence on diagnostic performance of tests carried out during a physical examination for the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy. STUDY DESIGN A review of the accuracy of diagnostic tests was carried out. STUDY SAMPLE The study sample comprised diagnostic studies comparing results of tests performed during a physical examination in diagnosing cervical radiculopathy with a reference standard of imaging or surgical findings. OUTCOME MEASURES Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios are presented, together with pooled results for sensitivity and specificity. METHODS A literature search up to March 2016 was performed in CENTRAL, PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2. RESULTS Five diagnostic accuracy studies were identified. Only Spurling's test was evaluated in more than one study, showing high specificity ranging from 0.89 to 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59-1.00); sensitivity varied from 0.38 to 0.97 (95% CI: 0.21-0.99). No studies were found that assessed the diagnostic accuracy of widely used neurological tests such as key muscle strength, tendon reflexes, and sensory impairments. CONCLUSIONS There is limited evidence for accuracy of physical examination tests for the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy. When consistent with patient history, clinicians may use a combination of Spurling's, axial traction, and an Arm Squeeze test to increase the likelihood of a cervical radiculopathy, whereas a combined results of four negative neurodynamics tests and an Arm Squeeze test could be used to rule out the disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik J Thoomes
- Fysio-Experts, Rijndijk 137, 2394 AG Hazerswoude, The Netherlands.
| | - Sarita van Geest
- Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Danielle A van der Windt
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele, Newcastle ST5 5BG, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
| | - Deborah Falla
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT UK, United Kingdom
| | - Arianne P Verhagen
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Centre University, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart W Koes
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Centre University, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Barbara Kuijper
- Maasstad Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Maasstadweg 21, 3079 DZ Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wendy G M Scholten-Peeters
- Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, The Netherlands
| | - Carmen L Vleggeert-Lankamp
- Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Donk RD, Verbeek ALM, Verhagen WIM, Groenewoud H, Hosman AJF, Bartels RHMA. What's the best surgical treatment for patients with cervical radiculopathy due to single-level degenerative disease? A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0183603. [PMID: 28850600 PMCID: PMC5574537 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2016] [Accepted: 08/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To investigate the efficacy of adding supplemental fusion or arthroplasty after cervical anterior discectomy for symptomatic mono-level cervical degenerative disease (radiculopathy), which has not been substantiated in controlled trials until now. Methods A randomized controlled trial is reported with 9 years follow up comparing anterior cervical anterior discectomy without fusion, with fusion by cage standalone, or with disc prosthesis. Patients suffering from symptomatic cervical disk degeneration at one level referred to spinal sections of department of neurosurgery or orthopedic surgery of a large general hospital with educational facilities were eligible. Neck Disability Index (NDI), McGill Pain Questionnaire Dutch language version (MPQ-DLV), physical-component summary (PCS), and mental-component summary (MCS) of the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), and re operation rate were evaluated. Findings 142 patients between 18 and 55 years were allocated. The median follow-up was 8.9±1.9 years (5.6 to 12.2 years). The response rate at last follow-up was 98.5%. NDI at the last follow-up did not differ between the three treatment groups, nor did the secondary outcomes as MPQ-DLV and PCS or MCS from SF-36. The major improvement occurred within the first 6 weeks after surgery. Afterward, it remained stable. Eleven patients underwent surgery for recurrent symptoms and signs due to nerve root compression at the index or adjacent level. Conclusions This randomized trial could not detect a difference between three surgical modalities for treating a single-level degenerative disk disease. Anterior cervical discectomy without implant seems to be similar to anterior cervical discectomy with fusion by cage stand-alone or with disk prosthesis. Due to the small study sample size, this statement should be considered as inconclusive so far. Trial registration ISRCTN41681847
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roland D. Donk
- Via Sana Clinics, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mill, the Netherlands
| | - André L. M. Verbeek
- Radboud university medical center, Department for Health Evidence, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Wim I. M. Verhagen
- Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Department of Neurology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Hans Groenewoud
- Radboud university medical center, Department for Health Evidence, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Allard J. F. Hosman
- Radboud university medical center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Ronald H. M. A. Bartels
- Radboud university medical center, Department of Neurosurgery, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Wickstrom BM, Oakley PA, Harrison DE. Non-surgical relief of cervical radiculopathy through reduction of forward head posture and restoration of cervical lordosis: a case report. J Phys Ther Sci 2017; 29:1472-1474. [PMID: 28878485 PMCID: PMC5574331 DOI: 10.1589/jpts.29.1472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2017] [Accepted: 05/09/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
[Purpose] To present a case demonstrating the relief of cervical radiculopathy following the dramatic reduction of forward head posture and restoration of the cervical lordosis by use of a multi-modal rehabilitation program incorporating cervical extension traction. [Subject and Methods] A 31-year-old male patient presented with severe cervical radiculopathy and muscle weakness as well as neck pain. The patient had limited neck range of motion, and multiple positive orthopedic tests. Radiography revealed excessive forward head posture with a cervical kyphosis. [Results] The patient received a multi-modal rehabilitation protocol including mirror image extension exercises, cervical extension traction, and spinal manipulative therapy. After forty treatments over 17 weeks, the patient reported a complete resolution of radiculopathy and significant improvement in neck pain level. Post radiography demonstrated correction of the spine and posture alignment. The patient remained well and maintained corrected posture with limited treatment one year later. [Conclusion] Our case demonstrates the relief of cervical radiculopathy resulting from the non-surgical correction of forward head posture and cervical kyphosis.
Collapse
|
36
|
Kjaer P, Kongsted A, Hartvigsen J, Isenberg-Jørgensen A, Schiøttz-Christensen B, Søborg B, Krog C, Møller CM, Halling CMB, Lauridsen HH, Hansen IR, Nørregaard J, Jørgensen KJ, Hansen LV, Jakobsen M, Jensen MB, Melbye M, Duel P, Christensen SW, Povlsen TM. National clinical guidelines for non-surgical treatment of patients with recent onset neck pain or cervical radiculopathy. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2017; 26:2242-2257. [PMID: 28523381 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-5121-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2017] [Revised: 04/27/2017] [Accepted: 05/02/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To summarise recommendations about 21 selected non-surgical interventions for recent onset (<12 weeks) non-specific neck pain (NP) and cervical radiculopathy (CR) based on two guidelines from the Danish Health Authority. METHODS Two multidisciplinary working groups formulated recommendations based on the GRADE approach. RESULTS Twelve recommendations were based on evidence and nine on consensus. Management should include information about prognosis, warning signs, and advise to remain active. For treatment, guidelines suggest different types of supervised exercise and manual therapy; combinations of exercise and manual therapy before medicine for NP; acupuncture for NP but not CR; traction for CR; and oral NSAID (oral or topical) and Tramadol after careful consideration for NP and CR. CONCLUSION Recommendations are based on low-quality evidence or on consensus, but are well aligned with recommendations from guidelines from North America. The working groups recommend intensifying research relating to all aspects of management of NP and CR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Per Kjaer
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark. .,Evidence, Education and Emergency Services, The Danish Health Authority, Islands Brygge 67, 2300, Copenhagen S, Denmark.
| | - Alice Kongsted
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.,Evidence, Education and Emergency Services, The Danish Health Authority, Islands Brygge 67, 2300, Copenhagen S, Denmark.,Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark
| | - Jan Hartvigsen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.,Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark
| | - Alexander Isenberg-Jørgensen
- Centre for Spine Surgery and Research, Spine Centre of Southern Denmark, Hospital Lillebaelt, Østre Houghvej 55, 5500, Middelfart, Denmark
| | - Berit Schiøttz-Christensen
- Spine Centre of Southern Denmark, Hospital Lillebaelt, Østre Houghvej 55, 5500, Middelfart, Denmark.,Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, Odense M, Denmark
| | - Bolette Søborg
- Evidence, Education and Emergency Services, The Danish Health Authority, Islands Brygge 67, 2300, Copenhagen S, Denmark
| | - Charlotte Krog
- Københavns Fysioterapi I/S, J. E. Ohlsens Gade 2, 1, th, 2100, København Ø, Denmark
| | | | - Christine Marie Bækø Halling
- Evidence, Education and Emergency Services, The Danish Health Authority, Islands Brygge 67, 2300, Copenhagen S, Denmark.,KORA, the Danish Institute for Local and Regional Government Research, Købmagergade 22, 1150, Copenhagen K, Denmark
| | - Henrik Hein Lauridsen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark
| | - Inge Ris Hansen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark
| | - Jesper Nørregaard
- Centre for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Dyrehavevej 29, 3400, Hillerød, Denmark
| | - Karsten Juhl Jørgensen
- Evidence, Education and Emergency Services, The Danish Health Authority, Islands Brygge 67, 2300, Copenhagen S, Denmark.,The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Rigshospitalet, 7811, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
| | - Lars Valentin Hansen
- Spine Unit, Department of Ortopaedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marie Jakobsen
- Evidence, Education and Emergency Services, The Danish Health Authority, Islands Brygge 67, 2300, Copenhagen S, Denmark.,KORA, the Danish Institute for Local and Regional Government Research, Købmagergade 22, 1150, Copenhagen K, Denmark
| | - Martin Bach Jensen
- Research Unit for General Practice in Aalborg, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Fyrkildevej 7,1, 9220, Aalborg Ø, Denmark
| | - Martin Melbye
- Aalborg Spine Clinic, Aalborg Rygklinik, Vingaardsgade 9, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Peter Duel
- Neurosurgical Department, Aarhus University Hospital, Nørrebrogade, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - Steffan W Christensen
- Department of Health Science and Technology, SMI®, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Physiotherapy, University College of Northern Denmark (UCN), Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Tina Myung Povlsen
- Evidence, Education and Emergency Services, The Danish Health Authority, Islands Brygge 67, 2300, Copenhagen S, Denmark.,Research and Test Center for Health Technologies. Rigshospitalet, Nordre Ringvej 57. Opgang 8, 5.sal., 2600, Glostrup, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
A Prospective Study of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Zero-Profile Cage Screw Implants for Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Is Segmental Lordosis Maintained at 2 Years? Asian Spine J 2017; 11:264-271. [PMID: 28443171 PMCID: PMC5401841 DOI: 10.4184/asj.2017.11.2.264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2016] [Revised: 09/11/2016] [Accepted: 09/27/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Study Design Prospective cohort study. Purpose To study clinicoradiological parameters of zero-profile cage screw used for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Overview of Literature Radiological parameters of various implants used for ACDF are available, but those for zero-profile cage are sparse. Methods Patients with unilateral intractable brachialgia due to single-level cervical disc prolapse between April 1, 2011 and March 31, 2014 were included. Clinical assessment included arm and neck pain using visual analogue score (VAS) and neck disability index (NDI) scores. Radiological assessment included motion segment height, adjacent disc height (upper and lower), segmental and cervical lordosis, implant subsidence, and pseudoarthrosis. Follow-ups were scheduled at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Results Thirty-four patients (26 males, 8 females) aged 30–50 years (mean, 42.2) showed excellent clinical improvement based on VAS scores (7.4–0 for arm and 2.0–0.6 for neck pains). Postoperative disc height improved by 11.33% (p<0.001), but at 2 years, the score deteriorated by 7.03% (p<0.001). Difference in the adjacent segment disc height at 2 years was 0.08% (p=0.8) in upper and 0.16% (p<0.001) in lower disc spaces. Average segmental lordosis achieved was 5.59° (p<0.001) from a preoperative kyphosis of 0.88°; at 2 years, an average loss of 7.05° (p<0.001) occurred, resulting in an average segmental kyphosis of 1.38°. Cervical lordosis improved from 11.59° to 14.88° (p=0.164), and at 2 years, it progressively improved to 22.59° (p<0.001). Three patients showed bone formation and two mild protrusion of the implant at 2 years without pseudoarthrosis/implant failure. Conclusions The zero-profile cage screw device provides good fusion and cervical lordosis but is incapable of maintaining the segmental lordosis achieved up to a 2-year follow-up. We also recommend caution when using it in patients with small vertebrae.
Collapse
|
38
|
Chin-See-Chong TC, Gadjradj PS, Boelen RJ, Harhangi BS. Current practice of cervical disc arthroplasty: a survey among 383 AOSpine International members. Neurosurg Focus 2017; 42:E8. [DOI: 10.3171/2016.11.focus16338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
The use of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) in spinal practice is controversial. This may be explained by the lack of studies with a large sample size and long-term outcomes. With this survey the authors aimed to evaluate the opinions of spine surgeons on the use of CDA in the current treatment of cervical disc herniation (CDH).
METHODS
A web-based survey was sent to all members of AOSpine International by email using SurveyMonkey on July 18, 2016. A single reminder was sent on August 18, 2016. Questions included geographic location; specialty; associated practice model; number of discectomies performed annually; the use of CDA, anterior cervical discectomy (ACD), and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF); and the expectations for clinical outcomes of these procedures.
RESULTS
A total of 383 questionnaires were analyzed. Almost all practitioners (97.9%) were male, with a mean of 15.0 ± 9.7 years of clinical experience. The majority of responders were orthopedic surgeons (54.6%). 84.3% performed ACDF as the standard technique for CDH. 47.8% of the surgeons occasionally used CDA, whereas 7.3% used CDA as standard approach for CDH. The most common arthroplasty device used was the ProDisc-C. Low evidence for benefits and higher costs were the most important reasons for not offering CDA. The risk of adjacent-level disease was considered smaller for CDA as compared with ACDF. However, ACDF was expected to have the highest effectiveness on arm pain (87.5%), followed by CDA (77.9%), while ACD had the least (12.6%).
CONCLUSIONS
In this survey, CDA was not considered to be the routine procedure to treat CDH. Reported benefits included the reduced risk of adjacent-level disease and preservation of motion of the neck. Lack of enough evidence on its effectiveness as well as higher costs were considered to be disadvantages of CDA. More research should be conducted on the implementation impact of CDA and the cost-effectiveness from society's perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pravesh S. Gadjradj
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, and
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Southerst D, Nordin MC, Côté P, Shearer HM, Varatharajan S, Yu H, Wong JJ, Sutton DA, Randhawa KA, van der Velde GM, Mior SA, Carroll LJ, Jacobs CL, Taylor-Vaisey AL. Is exercise effective for the management of neck pain and associated disorders or whiplash-associated disorders? A systematic review by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration. Spine J 2016; 16:1503-1523. [PMID: 24534390 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2013] [Revised: 01/20/2014] [Accepted: 02/03/2014] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT In 2008, the Neck Pain Task Force (NPTF) recommended exercise for the management of neck pain and whiplash-associated disorders (WAD). However, no evidence was available on the effectiveness of exercise for Grade III neck pain or WAD. Moreover, limited evidence was available to contrast the effectiveness of various types of exercises. PURPOSE To update the findings of the NPTF on the effectiveness of exercise for the management of neck pain and WAD grades I to III. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Systematic review and best evidence synthesis. SAMPLE Studies comparing the effectiveness of exercise to other conservative interventions or no intervention. OUTCOME MEASURES Outcomes of interest included self-rated recovery, functional recovery, pain intensity, health-related quality of life, psychological outcomes, and/or adverse events. METHODS We searched eight electronic databases from 2000 to 2013. Eligible studies were critically appraised using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria. The results of scientifically admissible studies were synthesized following best-evidence synthesis principles. RESULTS We retrieved 4,761 articles, and 21 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were critically appraised. Ten RCTs were scientifically admissible: nine investigated neck pain and one addressed WAD. For the management of recent neck pain Grade I/II, unsupervised range-of-motion exercises, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen, or manual therapy lead to similar outcomes. For recent neck pain Grade III, supervised graded strengthening is more effective than advice but leads to similar short-term outcomes as a cervical collar. For persistent neck pain and WAD Grade I/II, supervised qigong and combined strengthening, range-of-motion, and flexibility exercises are more effective than wait list. Additionally, supervised Iyengar yoga is more effective than home exercise. Finally, supervised high-dose strengthening is not superior to home exercises or advice. CONCLUSIONS We found evidence that supervised qigong, Iyengar yoga, and combined programs including strengthening, range of motion, and flexibility are effective for the management of persistent neck pain. We did not find evidence that one supervised exercise program is superior to another. Overall, most studies reported small effect sizes suggesting that a small clinical effect can be expected with the use of exercise alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Southerst
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M2H 3J1.
| | - Margareta C Nordin
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Occupational and Industrial Orthopedic Center, NYU School of Medicine, New York University, 63 Downing Street, New York, New York, USA, 10014
| | - Pierre Côté
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M2H 3J1; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), 2000 Simcoe Street North, Science building, Room 3000, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada, L1H 7K4
| | - Heather M Shearer
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M2H 3J1
| | - Sharanya Varatharajan
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M2H 3J1
| | - Hainan Yu
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M2H 3J1
| | - Jessica J Wong
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M2H 3J1
| | - Deborah A Sutton
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M2H 3J1
| | - Kristi A Randhawa
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M2H 3J1
| | - Gabrielle M van der Velde
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, Leslie Dan Pharmacy Building, University of Toronto, 6th Floor, Room 658, 144 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 3M2; Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, 144 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 3M2; Institute for Work and Health, 481 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2E9
| | - Silvano A Mior
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), 2000 Simcoe Street North, Science building, Room 3000, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada, L1H 7K4; Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M2H 3J1
| | - Linda J Carroll
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Alberta Centre for Injury Prevention and Research, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, 4075 RTF, 8308-114 Street, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2E1
| | - Craig L Jacobs
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M2H 3J1; Division of Clinical Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M2H 3J1
| | - Anne L Taylor-Vaisey
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M2H 3J1
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Wong JJ, Shearer HM, Mior S, Jacobs C, Côté P, Randhawa K, Yu H, Southerst D, Varatharajan S, Sutton D, van der Velde G, Carroll LJ, Ameis A, Ammendolia C, Brison R, Nordin M, Stupar M, Taylor-Vaisey A. Are manual therapies, passive physical modalities, or acupuncture effective for the management of patients with whiplash-associated disorders or neck pain and associated disorders? An update of the Bone and Joint Decade Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders by the OPTIMa collaboration. Spine J 2016; 16:1598-1630. [PMID: 26707074 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.08.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2014] [Revised: 06/05/2015] [Accepted: 08/11/2015] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT In 2008, the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders (Neck Pain Task Force) found limited evidence on the effectiveness of manual therapies, passive physical modalities, or acupuncture for the management of whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) or neck pain and associated disorders (NAD). PURPOSE This review aimed to update the findings of the Neck Pain Task Force, which examined the effectiveness of manual therapies, passive physical modalities, and acupuncture for the management of WAD or NAD. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING This is a systematic review and best evidence synthesis. SAMPLE The sample includes randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies comparing manual therapies, passive physical modalities, or acupuncture with other interventions, placebo or sham, or no intervention. OUTCOME MEASURES The outcome measures were self-rated or functional recovery, pain intensity, health-related quality of life, psychological outcomes, or adverse events. METHODS We systematically searched five databases from 2000 to 2014. Random pairs of independent reviewers critically appraised eligible studies using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria. Studies with a low risk of bias were stratified by the intervention's stage of development (exploratory vs. evaluation) and synthesized following best evidence synthesis principles. Funding was provided by the Ministry of Finance. RESULTS We screened 8,551 citations, and 38 studies were relevant and 22 had a low risk of bias. Evidence from seven exploratory studies suggests that (1) for recent but not persistent NAD grades I-II, thoracic manipulation offers short-term benefits; (2) for persistent NAD grades I-II, technical parameters of cervical mobilization (eg, direction or site of manual contact) do not impact outcomes, whereas one session of cervical manipulation is similar to Kinesio Taping; and (3) for NAD grades I-II, strain-counterstrain treatment is no better than placebo. Evidence from 15 evaluation studies suggests that (1) for recent NAD grades I-II, cervical and thoracic manipulation provides no additional benefit to high-dose supervised exercises, and Swedish or clinical massage adds benefit to self-care advice; (2) for persistent NAD grades I-II, home-based cupping massage has similar outcomes to home-based muscle relaxation, low-level laser therapy (LLLT) does not offer benefits, Western acupuncture provides similar outcomes to non-penetrating placebo electroacupuncture, and needle acupuncture provides similar outcomes to sham-penetrating acupuncture; (3) for WAD grades I-II, needle electroacupuncture offers similar outcomes as simulated electroacupuncture; and (4) for recent NAD grades III, a semi-rigid cervical collar with rest and graded strengthening exercises lead to similar outcomes, and LLLT does not offer benefits. CONCLUSIONS Our review adds new evidence to the Neck Pain Task Force and suggests that mobilization, manipulation, and clinical massage are effective interventions for the management of neck pain. It also suggests that electroacupuncture, strain-counterstrain, relaxation massage, and some passive physical modalities (heat, cold, diathermy, hydrotherapy, and ultrasound) are not effective and should not be used to manage neck pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica J Wong
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC); Department of Graduate Studies, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College.
| | - Heather M Shearer
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC); Division of Graduate Education and Research Programs, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC)
| | - Silvano Mior
- Division of Graduate Education and Research Programs, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC)
| | - Craig Jacobs
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC); Division of Clinical Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Canada
| | - Pierre Côté
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC); Canada Research Chair in Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT); Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT)
| | - Kristi Randhawa
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC); Division of Clinical Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Canada
| | - Hainan Yu
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC); Division of Clinical Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Canada
| | - Danielle Southerst
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC); Rebecca MacDonald Centre for Arthritis and Autoimmune Disease, Mount Sinai Hospital
| | - Sharanya Varatharajan
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC); Division of Clinical Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Canada
| | - Deborah Sutton
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC); Division of Clinical Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Canada
| | - Gabrielle van der Velde
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative; Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto; Institute for Work and Health
| | - Linda J Carroll
- Alberta Centre for Injury Control and Research and School of Public Health, University of Alberta
| | - Arthur Ameis
- Certification Program in Insurance Medicine and Medico-legal Expertise, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal
| | - Carlo Ammendolia
- Institute for Work and Health; Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto
| | - Robert Brison
- Clinical Research, Kingston General Hospital; Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Queen's University
| | - Margareta Nordin
- Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Environmental Medicine, Occupational and Industrial Orthopedic Center, NYU School of Medicine, New York University
| | - Maja Stupar
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC)
| | - Anne Taylor-Vaisey
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC)
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Bussières AE, Stewart G, Al-Zoubi F, Decina P, Descarreaux M, Hayden J, Hendrickson B, Hincapié C, Pagé I, Passmore S, Srbely J, Stupar M, Weisberg J, Ornelas J. The Treatment of Neck Pain–Associated Disorders and Whiplash-Associated Disorders: A Clinical Practice Guideline. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2016; 39:523-564.e27. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2016] [Revised: 07/14/2016] [Accepted: 08/10/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
42
|
Zronek M, Sanker H, Newcomb J, Donaldson M. The influence of home exercise programs for patients with non-specific or specific neck pain: a systematic review of the literature. J Man Manip Ther 2016; 24:62-73. [PMID: 27559275 DOI: 10.1179/2042618613y.0000000047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCT). OBJECTIVES To examine the effects of a therapeutic home exercise program (HEP) for patients with neck pain (associated with whiplash, non-specific, or specific neck pain, with or without radiculopathy, or cervicogenic headache) on pain, function, and disability. Our secondary aim was to describe the design, dosage, and adherence of the prescribed HEPs. BACKGROUND Neck pain is a leading cause of disability that affects 22-70% of the population. Different techniques have been found effective for the treatment of neck pain. However, there is conflicting evidence to support the role of a therapeutic HEP to reduce pain, disability, and improve function and quality of life (QOL). METHODS A systematic review in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement for reporting systematic reviews. The full-text review utilized the Maastricht-Amsterdam assessment tool to assess quality among RCTs. RESULTS A total of 1927 subjects included within seven full-text articles met our specific search strategy. It was found that HEPs with a focus on strength and endurance-training exercises, as well as self- mobilization, have a positive effect when used in combination with other conservative treatments or alone. CONCLUSIONS Home exercise programs that utilize either self-mobilizations within an augmented HEP to address specific spinal levels, or strengthening, and/or endurance exercise are effective at reducing neck pain, function, and disability and improving QOL. The benefit of HEPs in combination with other conservative interventions yields some benefit with a range of effect sizes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret Zronek
- Department of Physical Therapy, Walsh University, North Canton, OH, USA
| | - Holly Sanker
- Department of Physical Therapy, Walsh University, North Canton, OH, USA
| | - Jennifer Newcomb
- Department of Physical Therapy, Walsh University, North Canton, OH, USA
| | - Megan Donaldson
- Department of Physical Therapy, Walsh University, North Canton, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
Cervical radiculopathy is a common clinical scenario. Patients with radiculopathy typically present with neck pain, arm pain, or both. We review the epidemiology of cervical radiculopathy and discuss the diagnosis of this condition. This includes an overview of the pertinent findings on the patient history and physical examination. We also discuss relevant clinical syndromes that must be considered in the differential diagnosis including peripheral nerve entrapment syndromes and shoulder pathology. The natural history of cervical radiculopathy is reviewed and options for management are discussed. These options include conservative management, non-operative modalities such as physical therapy, steroid injections, and operative intervention. While the exact indications for surgical intervention have not yet been elucidated, we provide an overview of the available literature regarding indications and discuss the timing of intervention. The surgical outcomes of anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF), cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA), and posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sravisht Iyer
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Han Jo Kim
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Exercises for mechanical neck disorders: A Cochrane review update. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016; 24:25-45. [PMID: 27317503 DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2016.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 107] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2016] [Accepted: 04/13/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neck pain (NP) is disabling and costly. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness of exercise on pain, disability, function, patient satisfaction, quality of life (QoL) and global perceived effect (GPE) in adults with NP. METHODS We searched computerised databases up to May 2014 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing exercise to a control in adults with NP with/without cervicogenic headache (CGH) or radiculopathy. Two reviewers independently conducted selection, data abstraction and assessed risk of bias. Meta-analyses were performed to establish pooled standardised mean differences (SMDp). The Grade of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to summarise the body of evidence. MAIN RESULTS The following exercises (27 trials) were supported by 'Moderate GRADE' evidence: For chronic NP, 1) cervico-scapulothoracic and upper extremity (UE) strengthening for moderate to large pain reduction immediately post treatment (IP) and at short-term (ST) follow-up; 2) scapulothoracic and UE endurance training for a small pain reduction (IP/ST); 3) cervical, shoulder and scapulothoracic strengthening and stretching exercise for a small to large pain reduction in the long-term (LT) (SMDp -0.45 [95%CI: -0.72 to -0.18]) and function improvement; 4) cervico-scapulothoracic strengthening/stabilisation exercises for pain and function at intermediate-term (IT) (SMDp -14.90 [95%CI: -22.40 to -7.39]). 5) mindfulness exercises (Qigong) for minor improved function but not GPE (ST). For chronic CGH, cervico-scapulothoracic strengthening and endurance exercises including pressure biofeedback for small/moderate improvement of pain, function and GPE (IP/LT). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Specific strengthening exercises of the neck, scapulothoracic and shoulder for chronic NP and chronic CGH are beneficial. Future research should explore optimal dosage.
Collapse
|
45
|
|
46
|
Bukhari SRI, Shakil-Ur-Rehman S, Ahmad S, Naeem A. Comparison between effectiveness of Mechanical and Manual Traction combined with mobilization and exercise therapy in Patients with Cervical Radiculopathy. Pak J Med Sci 2016; 32:31-4. [PMID: 27022340 PMCID: PMC4795884 DOI: 10.12669/pjms.321.8923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objective: Cervical radiculopathy is a common neuro-musculo-skeletal disorder causing pain and disability. Traction is part of the evidence based manual physical therapy management due to its mechanical nature, type of traction and parameters related to its applicability and are still to be explored more through research. Our objective was to determine the Effects of Mechanical versus Manual Traction in Manual Physical Therapy combined with segmental mobilization and exercise therapy in the physical therapy management of Patients with Cervical Radiculopathy. Methods: This randomized control trial was conducted at department of physical therapy and rehabilitation, Rathore Hospital Faisalabad, from February to July 2015. Inclusion criteria were both male and female patients with evident symptoms of cervical spine radiculopathy and age ranged between 20-70 years. The exclusion criteria were Patients with history of trauma, neck pain without radiculopathy, aged less than 20 and more than 70. A total of 72 patients with cervical radiculopathy were screened out as per the inclusion criteria, 42 patients were randomly selected and placed into two groups by toss and trial method, and only 36 patients completed the study, while 6 dropped out. The mechanical traction was applied in group A and manual traction in group B along with common intervention of segmental mobilization and exercise therapy in both groups for 6 weeks. The patient’s outcomes were assessed by self reported NPRS and NDI at the baseline and after completion of 06 weeks exercise program at 3 days per week. The data was analyzed through SPSS version-21, and paired T test was applied at 95% level significance to determine the statistical deference between two groups. Results: Clinically the group of patients treated with mechanical traction managed pain (mean pre 6.26, mean post 1.43), and disability (mean pre 24.43 and mean post 7.26) more effectively as compared with the group of patients treated with manual traction (Pain mean pre 6.80, mean post 3.85 and disability mean pre 21.92 and post 12.19). Statistically the results of both mechanical and manual traction techniques are equally significant in group A and B for pain and disability (p-value less than 0.05). Conclusion: If patients of cervical radiculopathy treated with mechanical traction, segmental mobilization, and exercise therapy will manage pain and disability more effectively than treated with manual traction, segmental mobilization, and exercise therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Syed Rehan Iftikhar Bukhari
- Dr. Syed Rehan Iftikhar Bukhari, MS-OMPT, Lecturer, College of Physical Therapy, Government College University Faisalabad, Pakistan
| | - Syed Shakil-Ur-Rehman
- Dr. Syed Shakil-ur-Rehamn, MS(MSKPT), Principal/ Associate Professor, Riphah College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Shakeel Ahmad
- Dr. Shakeel Ahmad, MS(NMSKPT), Assistant Professor, Riphah College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Aamer Naeem
- Dr. Aamer Naeem, Post Professional DPT, Lecturer, Riphah College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Management of neck pain and associated disorders: A clinical practice guideline from the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2016; 25:2000-22. [PMID: 26984876 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4467-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 144] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2015] [Revised: 02/15/2016] [Accepted: 02/15/2016] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop an evidence-based guideline for the management of grades I-III neck pain and associated disorders (NAD). METHODS This guideline is based on recent systematic reviews of high-quality studies. A multidisciplinary expert panel considered the evidence of effectiveness, safety, cost-effectiveness, societal and ethical values, and patient experiences (obtained from qualitative research) when formulating recommendations. Target audience includes clinicians; target population is adults with grades I-III NAD <6 months duration. RECOMMENDATION 1 Clinicians should rule out major structural or other pathologies as the cause of NAD. Once major pathology has been ruled out, clinicians should classify NAD as grade I, II, or III. RECOMMENDATION 2 Clinicians should assess prognostic factors for delayed recovery from NAD. RECOMMENDATION 3 Clinicians should educate and reassure patients about the benign and self-limited nature of the typical course of NAD grades I-III and the importance of maintaining activity and movement. Patients with worsening symptoms and those who develop new physical or psychological symptoms should be referred to a physician for further evaluation at any time during their care. RECOMMENDATION 4 For NAD grades I-II ≤3 months duration, clinicians may consider structured patient education in combination with: range of motion exercise, multimodal care (range of motion exercise with manipulation or mobilization), or muscle relaxants. In view of evidence of no effectiveness, clinicians should not offer structured patient education alone, strain-counterstrain therapy, relaxation massage, cervical collar, electroacupuncture, electrotherapy, or clinic-based heat. RECOMMENDATION 5 For NAD grades I-II >3 months duration, clinicians may consider structured patient education in combination with: range of motion and strengthening exercises, qigong, yoga, multimodal care (exercise with manipulation or mobilization), clinical massage, low-level laser therapy, or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. In view of evidence of no effectiveness, clinicians should not offer strengthening exercises alone, strain-counterstrain therapy, relaxation massage, relaxation therapy for pain or disability, electrotherapy, shortwave diathermy, clinic-based heat, electroacupuncture, or botulinum toxin injections. RECOMMENDATION 6 For NAD grade III ≤3 months duration, clinicians may consider supervised strengthening exercises in addition to structured patient education. In view of evidence of no effectiveness, clinicians should not offer structured patient education alone, cervical collar, low-level laser therapy, or traction. RECOMMENDATION 7: For NAD grade III >3 months duration, clinicians should not offer a cervical collar. Patients who continue to experience neurological signs and disability more than 3 months after injury should be referred to a physician for investigation and management. RECOMMENDATION 8: Clinicians should reassess the patient at every visit to determine if additional care is necessary, the condition is worsening, or the patient has recovered. Patients reporting significant recovery should be discharged.
Collapse
|
48
|
Baek SH, Oh JW, Shin JS, Lee J, Lee YJ, Kim MR, Ahn YJ, Choi A, Park KB, Shin BC, Lee MS, Ha IH. Long term follow-up of cervical intervertebral disc herniation inpatients treated with integrated complementary and alternative medicine: a prospective case series observational study. BMC COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE 2016; 16:52. [PMID: 26850111 PMCID: PMC4744400 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-016-1034-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2015] [Accepted: 02/01/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Background Symptomatic cervical intervertebral disc herniation (IDH) presenting as neck pain accompanied by arm pain is a common affliction whose prevalence continues to rise, and is a frequent reason for integrative inpatient care using complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in Korea. However, studies on its long term effects are scarce. Methods A total 165 patients with cervical IDH admitted between January 2011 and September 2014 to a hospital that provides conventional and Korean medicine integrative treatment with CAM as the main modality were observed in a prospective observational study. Patients underwent CAM treatment administered by Korean medicine doctors (KMDs) in accordance with a predetermined protocol for the length of hospital stay, and additional conventional treatment by medical doctors (MDs) as referred by KMDs. Short term outcomes were assessed at discharge and long term follow-ups were conducted through phone interviews after discharge. Numeric rating scale (NRS) of neck and radiating arm pain, neck disability index (NDI), 5-point patient global impression of change (PGIC), and factors influencing long term satisfaction rates in PGIC were assessed. Results Of 165 patients who received inpatient treatment 20.8 ± 11.2 days, 117 completed the long term follow-up up at 625.36 ± 196.7 days post-admission. Difference in NRS between admission and discharge in the long term follow-up group (n = 117) was 2.71 (95 % CI, 2.33, 3.09) for neck pain, 2.33 (95 % CI, 1.9, 2.77) for arm pain, and that of NDI 14.6 (95 % CI, 11.89, 17.32), and corresponding scores in the non-long term follow-up group (n = 48) were 2.83 (95 % CI, 2.22, 3.45) for neck pain, 2.48 (95 % CI, 1.84, 3.12) for arm pain, and that of NDI was 14.86 (95 % CI, 10.41, 19.3). Difference in long term NRS of neck pain and arm pain from baseline was 3.15 (95 % CI, 2.67, 3.64), and 2.64 (95 % CI, 1.99, 3.29), respectively. PGIC was reported to be “satisfactory” or higher in 79.5 % of patients at long term follow-up. Conclusions Though the observational nature of this study limits us from drawing a more decisive conclusion, these results suggest that integrative treatment focused on CAM in cervical IDH inpatients may achieve favorable results in pain and functional improvement. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02257723. Registered October 2, 2014.
Collapse
|
49
|
Cheng CH, Tsai LC, Chung HC, Hsu WL, Wang SF, Wang JL, Lai DM, Chien A. Exercise training for non-operative and post-operative patient with cervical radiculopathy: a literature review. J Phys Ther Sci 2015; 27:3011-8. [PMID: 26504347 PMCID: PMC4616148 DOI: 10.1589/jpts.27.3011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2015] [Accepted: 06/24/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
[Purpose] Cervical radiculopathy is a clinical condition associated with pain, numbness
and/or muscle weaknesses of the upper extremities due to a compression or irritation of
the cervical nerve roots. It is usually managed conservatively but surgical intervention
is sometimes required for those who fail to respond adequately. This study performed a
literature review to determine the effects of exercise on non-operative and post-operative
cervical radiculopathy patients. [Methods] The PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL and Scopus
databases were searched to identify relevant articles published from January 1997 to May
2014, which explicitly stated that an exercise program was employed as an intervention for
cervical radiculopathy. The therapeutic effectiveness and outcomes were then classified
based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)
model. [Results] Eleven studies were identified and included in the final analysis. In
these studies, the main forms of exercise training were specific strengthening and general
stretching exercises. Levels of evidence were graded as either I or II for all studies
according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine. The PEDro Scale score of these
studies ranged from 5 to 8. [Conclusion] A review of eleven high-level evidence and
high-quality studies revealed that, based on the ICF model, exercise training is
beneficial for improving the body function as well as activity participation of cervical
radiculopathy patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chih-Hsiu Cheng
- Department of Physical Therapy and Graduate Institute of Rehabilitation Science, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taiwan
| | | | - Hui-Chu Chung
- Department of Physical Therapy and Graduate Institute of Rehabilitation Science, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Li Hsu
- School and Graduate Institute of Physical Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taiwan
| | - Shwu-Fen Wang
- School and Graduate Institute of Physical Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taiwan
| | - Jaw-Lin Wang
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taiwan
| | - Dar-Ming Lai
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Andy Chien
- Department of Physical Therapy and Graduate Institute of Rehabilitation Science, China Medical University, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
de Rooij JD, Harhangi BS, Verhagen AP, Groeneweg JG, Fehlings MG, Huygen FJPM. Nucleoplasty for cervical radiculopathy or cervical radicular pain due to disc herniation. THE COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 2015. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Judith D de Rooij
- Erasmus Medical Center; Pain Treatment Center; Postbox 2040 Rotterdam Netherlands 3000 CA
| | - B S Harhangi
- Erasmus Medical Center; Department of Neurosurgery; Postbox 2040 Rotterdam Netherlands 3000 CA
| | - Arianne P Verhagen
- Erasmus Medical Center; Department of General Practice; PO Box 2040 Rotterdam Netherlands 3000 CA
| | - J G Groeneweg
- Erasmus Medical Center; Pain Treatment Center; Postbox 2040 Rotterdam Netherlands 3000 CA
| | - Michael G Fehlings
- University of Toronto; Halbert Chair in Neural Repair and Regeneration; Toronto ON Canada
| | - F JPM Huygen
- Erasmus Medical Center; Pain Treatment Center; Postbox 2040 Rotterdam Netherlands 3000 CA
| |
Collapse
|