1
|
Gonah L, Nomatshila SC. Social and Behavioural Change Communication Challenges, Opportunities and Lessons from Past Public Health Emergencies and Disease Outbreaks: A Scoping Review. Ann Glob Health 2024; 90:62. [PMID: 39464416 PMCID: PMC11505028 DOI: 10.5334/aogh.4418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 10/01/2024] [Indexed: 10/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Documentation of social behavioural change communication (SBCC) regarding challenges, opportunities and lessons drawn from past public health emergencies is worthwhile to inform priorities for future response efforts. Aim: The aim of this review is to scope the evidence on social behavioural change communication regarding challenges, opportunities and lessons drawn from Ebola, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), monkeypox and cholera outbreaks from studies published before March 2024, and suggest priorities for future response efforts. Methods: A Boolean strategy was used to search electronic databases for relevant published articles, complemented by relevant studies identified from reference lists. Results: The challenges, opportunities, lessons learnt and priorities for SBCC were consistent across study contexts, showing marked variations over time. The significance of technology, infodemic management, and behavioural data generation emerged more frequently and became increasingly important over time. Identified challenges were uptake hesitancy, limited capacity to undertake infodemic management, inadequate funding and human resources for SBCC, competing priorities, parallel or conflicting interventions due to inadequate coordination, difficulties evaluating SBCC programmes and missed opportunities for integration into routine programmes. Existing supportive structures for SBCC, strong political will and participation, as well as rapid information exchange enabled by technological advancement, represented opportunities for enhancing the effectiveness of SBCC programmes. Key lessons were that a multisectoral approach and coordination, partnership and active collaboration amongst stakeholders; building/strengthening trust, target population segmentation and localization of interventions, are important for enhancing the effectiveness of SBCC programmes. Political will, involvement and participation represent the core of social behavioural change (communication) interventions during a public health emergency. Conclusion: SBCC programming for future response to public health emergencies and disease outbreaks should consider the diverse assortment of benefits, threats/challenges and opportunities brought about by technology, infodemics and behavioural data generation to be more effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laston Gonah
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Walter Sisulu University, South Africa
| | - Sibusiso Cyprian Nomatshila
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Walter Sisulu University, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fallah MP, Sembuche S, Kabwe PC, Dereje N, Abubakar T, Chipendo T, Ojo J, Bamutura M, Shaweno T, Ramakhunoane S, Ts'oeu S, Ndoula ST, Agoambin N, Kangbai DM, Jalloh MB, Tinuga F, Mutayoba R, Jalang'o RE, Kiarie J, Legge GA, David V, Clarke AT, Kamara PS, Kalangwa K, Sakanga V, Ndembi N, Raji T, Abdulaziz M. Urgent support mechanism: saving millions of COVID-19 vaccines from expiry in Africa. BMJ Glob Health 2024; 9:e015181. [PMID: 38844381 PMCID: PMC11163607 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 05/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Delivering COVID-19 vaccines with 4-6 weeks shelf life remains one of Africa's most pressing challenges. The Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC) leadership recognised that COVID-19 vaccines donated to many African countries were at risk of expiry considering the short shelf life on delivery in the Member States and slow vaccine uptake rates. Thus, a streamlined rapid response system, the urgent support mechanism, was developed to assist countries accelerate COVID-19 vaccine uptake. We describe the achievements and lessons learnt during implementation of the urgent support mechanism in eight African countries. An Africa CDC team was rapidly deployed to meet with the Ministry of Health of each country alerted for COVID-19 vaccine expiry and identified national implementing partners to quickly develop operational work plans and strategies to scale up the urgent use of the vaccines. The time between the initiation of alerts to the start of the implementation was typically within 2 weeks. A total of approximately 2.5 million doses of vaccines, costing $900 000, were prevented from expiration. The urgent support has also contributed to the increased COVID-19 vaccination coverage in the Member States from 16.1% at the initiation to 25.3% at the end of the urgent support. Some of the effective strategies used by the urgent support mechanism included coordination between Africa CDC and country vaccine task forces, establishment of vaccination centres, building the capacity of routine and surge health workforce, procurement and distribution of vaccine ancillaries, staff training, advocacy and sensitisation events, and use of trusted religious scriptures and community influencers to support public health messages. The urgent support mechanism demonstrated a highly optimised process and serves as a successful example for acceleration and integration of vaccination into different healthcare delivery points.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mosoka Papa Fallah
- Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Senga Sembuche
- Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | | | - Nebiyu Dereje
- Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Tijani Abubakar
- Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Tendai Chipendo
- Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - John Ojo
- Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Moses Bamutura
- Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Tamrat Shaweno
- Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Susan Ramakhunoane
- Expanded Program of Immunization, Government of Lesotho Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Maseru, Lesotho
| | - Silane Ts'oeu
- Christian Health Association of Lesotho, Maseru, Lesotho
| | | | | | - Desmond Maada Kangbai
- Government of Sierra Leone Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Western Area, Sierra Leone
| | | | | | - Rita Mutayoba
- Amref Health Africa in Tanzania, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, United Republic of
| | - Rose E Jalang'o
- National Vaccines and Immunization Program, Ministry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya
| | | | | | | | - Adolphus T Clarke
- Expanded Programme on Immunisation, Republic of Liberia Ministry of Health, Monrovia, Montserrado, Liberia
| | | | | | | | - Nicaise Ndembi
- Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Tajudeen Raji
- Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Mohammed Abdulaziz
- Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Akseer N, Phillips DE. Drivers of success in global health outcomes: A content analysis of Exemplar studies. PLOS GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH 2024; 4:e0003000. [PMID: 38722816 PMCID: PMC11081220 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
Applying a positive outlier lens is one effective approach for generating evidence to inform global health policy, program, and funding decisions. Exemplars in Global Health (EGH) is a program that studies positive outlier countries that have made extraordinary progress in health outcomes (despite limited resources) and disseminates their successes through multiple types of outputs. To date, EGH has studied, or is studying, 14 global health topics in 28 countries. This paper aims to identify findings, summarized as themes and sub-themes, that appear among all completed EGH studies. We developed a conceptual framework and used a content analysis approach to identify the top thematic areas that appear as drivers for programmatic success across EGH studies that were completed between June 2020-May 2023. The EGH studies (N = 31) spanned six topics including under-five child mortality (n = 6), childhood stunting (n = 5), community health workers (CHW) (n = 4), vaccine delivery (n = 3), COVID-19 response (n = 6), and newborn and maternal mortality reduction (n = 7) across 19 countries in sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America, South and Central Asia, and the Caribbean regions. Top drivers of success were defined as those critical or catalytic in achieving the intended outcome. Eight key drivers were identified: (1) efficient data collection and use for decision-making, (2) strong political commitment and health leadership, (3) effective stakeholder coordination, (4) a local, connected, and capacitated workforce, (5) intentional women's empowerment and engagement, (6) effective adoption and implementation of national policies, (7) effective and sustainable financing, and (8) equitable, efficient outreach and targeting. These cross-cutting drivers span a broad range of development outcomes, sectors, and populations, and indicate a need to effectively integrate people, systems, and sectors to improve global health outcomes. Findings from this study aim to support peer learning among countries and support evidence-based decision-making for funders, policymakers, and other key stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Akseer
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
- Exemplars in Global Health, Gates Ventures, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - David E. Phillips
- Exemplars in Global Health, Gates Ventures, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nesbitt RC, Asilaza VK, Gignoux E, Koyuncu A, Gitahi P, Nkemenang P, Duncker J, Antier Z, Haile M, Gakima P, Wamala JF, Loro FB, Biem D, Rull M, Azman AS, Rumunu J, Ciglenecki I. Vaccination coverage and adverse events following a reactive vaccination campaign against hepatitis E in Bentiu displaced persons camp, South Sudan. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2024; 18:e0011661. [PMID: 38252655 PMCID: PMC10833508 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hepatitis E (HEV) genotypes 1 and 2 are the common cause of jaundice and acute viral hepatitis that can cause large-scale outbreaks. HEV infection is associated with adverse fetal outcomes and case fatality risks up to 31% among pregnant women. An efficacious three-dose recombinant vaccine (Hecolin) has been licensed in China since 2011 but until 2022, had not been used for outbreak response despite a 2015 WHO recommendation. The first ever mass vaccination campaign against hepatitis E in response to an outbreak was implemented in 2022 in Bentiu internally displaced persons camp in South Sudan targeting 27,000 residents 16-40 years old, including pregnant women. METHODS We conducted a vaccination coverage survey using simple random sampling from a sampling frame of all camp shelters following the third round of vaccination. For survey participants vaccinated in the third round in October, we asked about the onset of symptoms experienced within 72 hours of vaccination. During each of the three vaccination rounds, passive surveillance of adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) was put in place at vaccination sites and health facilities in Bentiu IDP camp. RESULTS We surveyed 1,599 individuals and found that self-reported coverage with one or more dose was 86% (95% CI 84-88%), 73% (95% CI 70-75%) with two or more doses and 58% (95% CI 55-61%) with three doses. Vaccination coverage did not differ significantly by sex or age group. We found no significant difference in coverage of at least one dose between pregnant and non-pregnant women, although coverage of at least two and three doses was 8 and 14 percentage points lower in pregnant women. The most common reasons for non-vaccination were temporary absence or unavailability, reported by 60% of unvaccinated people. Passive AEFI surveillance captured few mild AEFI, and through the survey we found that 91 (7.6%) of the 1,195 individuals reporting to have been vaccinated in October 2022 reported new symptoms starting within 72 hours after vaccination, most commonly fever, headache or fatigue. CONCLUSIONS We found a high coverage of at least one dose of the Hecolin vaccine following three rounds of vaccination, and no severe AEFI. The vaccine was well accepted and well tolerated in the Bentiu IDP camp community and should be considered for use in future outbreak response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Etienne Gignoux
- Epicentre, Paris, France
- Médecins Sans Frontières, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Aybüke Koyuncu
- Epicentre, Paris, France
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, United States of America
| | | | | | | | | | - Melat Haile
- Médecins Sans Frontières, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | - Duol Biem
- Ministry of Health, Juba, South Sudan
| | - Monica Rull
- Médecins Sans Frontières, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Andrew S. Azman
- Médecins Sans Frontières, Geneva, Switzerland
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, United States of America
- Geneva Centre for Emerging Viral Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
- Division of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Malchrzak W, Babicki M, Pokorna-Kałwak D, Mastalerz-Migas A. The Influence of Introducing Free Vaccination against Streptococcus pneumoniae on the Uptake of Recommended Vaccination in Poland. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1838. [PMID: 38140242 PMCID: PMC10747999 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11121838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Since 2017, pneumococcal vaccination has evolved from a recommended chargeable vaccination to a mandatory, and therefore free, vaccination for all children. While a 10-valent vaccine is commonly used, parents have the option to use a 13-valent vaccine for a fee. This study aimed to investigate whether and how the introduction of free pneumococcal vaccination affected the uptake of recommended vaccination and to assess the association of chargeable pneumococcal vaccination with recommended vaccination. Data from 1595 vaccination record cards kept by six primary care clinics in urban and rural areas of Poland were collected and analyzed for children born between 2015 and 2018. Belonging to the clinic and the year of birth were the only inclusion criteria. Following the introduction of free universal pneumococcal vaccination, more children were vaccinated with the recommended vaccination (61.2% vs. 66.6%, p = 0.026). The most significant change was in vaccination against rotavirus (48.5% vs. 54.4%, p = 0.018) and against meningococcal B bacteria (4.8% vs. 17.0%, p < 0.001). Children who received chargeable pneumococcal vaccination were also significantly more likely to be vaccinated with recommended vaccines (54.6% vs. 75.9%, p < 0.001). In particular, this was the case for multivalent vaccinations-against rotavirus, chickenpox, and meningococcal C bacteria. Reducing the impact of the economic factor, for example, by introducing free vaccinations, should have a positive impact on the uptake of other recommended vaccinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wojciech Malchrzak
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wrocław, Poland; (M.B.); (D.P.-K.); (A.M.-M.)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Danek S, Achelrod D, Wichmann O, Schwendicke F. The Role of Vaccination Centers in a National Mass Immunization Campaign-Policymaker Insights from the German COVID-19 Pandemic Vaccine Roll-Out. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1552. [PMID: 37896955 PMCID: PMC10611148 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11101552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Revised: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
During the COVID-19 vaccination campaign, Germany, like other high-income countries, introduced mass vaccination centers for administering vaccinations. This qualitative study aimed to examine the role that these novel, temporary government healthcare structures played in a mass immunization roll-out and how they can be optimally deployed. In addition, learnings for general emergency preparedness were explored. A total of 27 high-level policymakers responsible for planning and implementing the COVID vaccination campaign at the national and state level in Germany were interviewed in May and June 2022. The semi-structured interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. Interviewees indicated that mass vaccination structures played an essential role with respect to controllability, throughput, accessibility and openness in line with the key success criteria vaccination coverage, speed and accessibility. In contrast to the regular vaccination structures (private medical practices and occupational health services), public administration has direct authority over mass vaccination centers, allowing for reliable vaccine access prioritization and documentation. The deployment of vaccination centers should be guided by vaccine availability and demand, and vaccine requirements related to logistics, as well as local capacities, i.e., public-health-service strength and the physician density, to ensure effective, timely and equitable access. Improvements to the capacity use, scalability and flexibility of governmental vaccination structures are warranted for future pandemics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stella Danek
- Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral Diagnostics, Digital Health and Health Services Research, Assmannshauser Straβe 4-6, 14197 Berlin, Germany;
| | | | - Ole Wichmann
- Immunization Unit, Robert Koch Institute, 13353 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Falk Schwendicke
- Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral Diagnostics, Digital Health and Health Services Research, Assmannshauser Straβe 4-6, 14197 Berlin, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gilmore B, Gerlach N, Abreu Lopes C, Diallo AA, Bhattacharyya S, de Claro V, Ndejjo R, Nyamupachitu Mago E, Tchetchia A. Community engagement to support COVID-19 vaccine uptake: a living systematic review protocol. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e063057. [PMID: 36127122 PMCID: PMC9490295 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Widespread vaccination against COVID-19 is one of the most effective ways to control, and ideally, end the global COVID-19 pandemic. Vaccine hesitancy and vaccine rates vary widely across countries and populations and are influenced by complex sociocultural, political, economic and psychological factors. Community engagement is an integral strategy within immunisation campaigns and has been shown to improve vaccine acceptance. As evidence on community engagement to support COVID-19 vaccine uptake is emerging and constantly changing, research that lessens the knowledge-to-practice gap by providing regular and up-to-date evidence on current best-practice is essential. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A living systematic review will be conducted which includes an initial systematic review and bimonthly review updates. Searching and screening for the review and subsequent updates will be done in four streams: a systematic search of six databases, grey literature review, preprint review and citizen sourcing. The screening will be done by a minimum of two reviewers at title/abstract and full-text in Covidence, a systematic review management software. Data will be extracted across predefined fields in an excel spreadsheet that includes information about article characteristics, context and population, community engagement approaches, and outcomes. Synthesis will occur using the convergent integrated approach. We will explore the potential to quantitatively synthesise primary outcomes depending on heterogeneity of the studies. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The initial review and subsequent bimonthly searches and their results will be disseminated transparently via open-access methods. Quarterly briefs will be shared on the reviews' social media platforms and across other interested networks and repositories. A dedicated web link will be created on the Community Health-Community of Practice site for sharing findings and obtaining feedback. A mailing list will be developed and interested parties can subscribe for updates. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42022301996.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brynne Gilmore
- UCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education and Innovation in Health Systems (UCD IRIS), School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Nina Gerlach
- UCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education and Innovation in Health Systems (UCD IRIS), School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Claudia Abreu Lopes
- International Institute for Global Health United Nations University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Alpha A Diallo
- READ-GROUP, Conakry, Guinea
- Health Research Ethics Committee, Conakry, Guinea
| | - Sanghita Bhattacharyya
- Public Health Foundation of India, Gurugram, Haryana, India
- Community Health-Community of Practice Collectivity, United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) Headquarters, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Vergil de Claro
- RTI International, Pasig City, Philippines
- Evidence for Health, Pasig City, Philippines
| | - Rawlance Ndejjo
- Department of Disease Control and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | - Adalbert Tchetchia
- Community Health-Community of Practice Collectivity, United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) Headquarters, New York City, New York, USA
- Expanded Programme on Immunization, Yaounde, Cameroon
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Egbewande OM. The RTS,S malaria vaccine: Journey from conception to recommendation. PUBLIC HEALTH IN PRACTICE 2022; 4:100283. [PMID: 36570405 PMCID: PMC9773038 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhip.2022.100283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The RTS,S malaria vaccine was recently recommended for use among children at risk in malaria endemic regions. Although significant efforts have been made to minimise malaria cases, the results of these innovations have not been totally satisfactory due to specific limitations. However, this revolutionary vaccine has a great tendency to put an end to malaria. Being the first vaccine against malaria, this commentary examines its journey from the idealisation and conception to the recommendation by the World Health Organization. The commentary also examines some of the challenges that might affect the execution of the vaccination programme in sub-Saharan Africa and other malaria endemic regions and suggest recommendations to overcome the possible them.
Collapse
|
9
|
Sahay S, Gigliotti RA, Dwyer M. Role conflict, job crafting, stress and resilience among nurses during COVID‐19. JOURNAL OF CONTINGENCIES AND CRISIS MANAGEMENT 2022. [PMCID: PMC9350114 DOI: 10.1111/1468-5973.12417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Crises have the potential to heighten stress levels among frontline employees. In general, to cope with crisis‐related stress, employees often improvise or job craft to meet the demands of the crisis. In addition to this, they need resources and directions to support their innovation by lowering role conflict. During the COVID‐19 pandemic, nurses too were compelled to improvise as they struggled with multiple challenges related to the uncertainty associated with the virus and the assignment of atypical job functions. These concerns affected nurses' wellbeing and impacted their jobs. This two‐phase sequential study began with interviews (n = 14), followed by a survey (n = 152) exploring nurses' perspectives regarding this noncausality crisis and the impact of organizational variables on their stress levels. While improvisation and job crafting were found to be important for adaptive resilience, the process involved in achieving resilience ended up increasing stress for nurses. Additionally, nurses faced role conflict, which contributed to greater levels of stress. To support nurses and enhance resilience, organizations should provide resources, role direction and training for effective job crafting and orientation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surabhi Sahay
- Corporate Communication Pennsylvania State University Abington Pennsylvania USA
| | - Ralph A. Gigliotti
- Center for Organizational Leadership Rutgers University New Brunswick New Jersey USA
| | - Maria Dwyer
- School of Communication and Information (Retired) Rutgers University New Brunswick New Jersey USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yendewa SA, Ghazzawi M, James PB, Smith M, Massaquoi SP, Babawo LS, Deen GF, Russell JBW, Samai M, Sahr F, Lakoh S, Salata RA, Yendewa GA. COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy among Healthcare Workers and Trainees in Freetown, Sierra Leone: A Cross-Sectional Study. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:757. [PMID: 35632513 PMCID: PMC9143387 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10050757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite having safe and efficacious vaccines against COVID-19, vaccine hesitancy is widespread. Although a trusted source of information, vaccine hesitancy has been reported among healthcare professionals, yet few studies have explored this phenomenon in sub-Saharan Africa. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of healthcare professionals in Sierra Leone from January to March 2022. Measures included sociodemographic/health-related information and COVID-19-related concerns. From the responses, we constructed a hesitancy (VAX) score, with higher scores implying negative attitudes or unwillingness to vaccinate. Multivariate linear regression was used to access factors associated with vaccine hesitancy. Overall, 592 participants submitted responses (67.2% female, mean age 29 years, 5.6% physicians/pharmacists, 44.3% medical students, 29.2% nurses, 20.9% nursing students). The mean VAX score was 43.27 ± 8.77, with 60.1% of respondents classified as vaccine hesitant (>50th percentile) and 13.8% as highly hesitant (>75th percentile). Worries about unforeseen future effects (76.3%), a preference for natural immunity (59.5%), and profiteering/mistrust of health authorities (53.1%) were the most common concerns. Being a medical student (β = 0.105, p = 0.011) and previously refusing a recommended vaccine (β = 0.177, p < 0.001) were predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Our findings call for addressing vaccine hesitancy among healthcare professionals as an essential component of strategies aimed at increasing COVID-19 vaccine uptake in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sahr A. Yendewa
- Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Sierra Leone; (S.A.Y.); (M.S.); (S.P.M.); (G.F.D.); (J.B.W.R.); (M.S.); (F.S.); (S.L.)
- Connaught Hospital, University of Sierra Leone Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | | | - Peter B. James
- Faculty of Health, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia;
| | - Mohamed Smith
- Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Sierra Leone; (S.A.Y.); (M.S.); (S.P.M.); (G.F.D.); (J.B.W.R.); (M.S.); (F.S.); (S.L.)
- Connaught Hospital, University of Sierra Leone Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - Samuel P. Massaquoi
- Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Sierra Leone; (S.A.Y.); (M.S.); (S.P.M.); (G.F.D.); (J.B.W.R.); (M.S.); (F.S.); (S.L.)
| | - Lawrence S. Babawo
- Department of Nursing, School of Community Health Sciences, Njala University, Bo Campus, Bo, Sierra Leone;
| | - Gibrilla F. Deen
- Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Sierra Leone; (S.A.Y.); (M.S.); (S.P.M.); (G.F.D.); (J.B.W.R.); (M.S.); (F.S.); (S.L.)
- Connaught Hospital, University of Sierra Leone Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Sierra Leone
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, University of Sierra Leone, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - James B. W. Russell
- Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Sierra Leone; (S.A.Y.); (M.S.); (S.P.M.); (G.F.D.); (J.B.W.R.); (M.S.); (F.S.); (S.L.)
- Connaught Hospital, University of Sierra Leone Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Sierra Leone
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, University of Sierra Leone, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - Mohamed Samai
- Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Sierra Leone; (S.A.Y.); (M.S.); (S.P.M.); (G.F.D.); (J.B.W.R.); (M.S.); (F.S.); (S.L.)
- Connaught Hospital, University of Sierra Leone Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Sierra Leone
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, University of Sierra Leone, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - Foday Sahr
- Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Sierra Leone; (S.A.Y.); (M.S.); (S.P.M.); (G.F.D.); (J.B.W.R.); (M.S.); (F.S.); (S.L.)
| | - Sulaiman Lakoh
- Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Sierra Leone; (S.A.Y.); (M.S.); (S.P.M.); (G.F.D.); (J.B.W.R.); (M.S.); (F.S.); (S.L.)
- Connaught Hospital, University of Sierra Leone Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Sierra Leone
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, University of Sierra Leone, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - Robert A. Salata
- Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA;
- Division of Infectious Diseases and HIV Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - George A. Yendewa
- Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA;
- Division of Infectious Diseases and HIV Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Masresha B, Poy A, Weldegebriel G, Mbuyita S, Fussum D, Bwaka A, Paluku G, Atuhebwe P, Mihigo R, Impouma B. Progress with COVID-19 vaccination in the WHO African Region in 2021. Pan Afr Med J 2022; 41:8. [PMID: 36159031 PMCID: PMC9474845 DOI: 10.11604/pamj.supp.2022.41.2.34102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION as of end 2021, ten different vaccines have received Emergency use listing by the World Health Organisation. The vaccination response to the COVID pandemic started in February 2021 in the WHO African Region. WHO proposed a national coverage target of fully vaccinated population of 40% by the end of December 2021. This manuscript attempts to review the progress in the roll-out of COVID-19 vaccination in the African Region. METHODS we analysed the aggregate COVID-19 vaccine uptake and utilization data from the immunisation monitoring databases set up by countries and shared with the WHO Regional Office for Africa. RESULTS as of 31 December 2021, a total of 340,663,156 doses of COVID-19 vaccine were received in 46 countries in the African Region. The weekly average doses administered was 4,069,934 throughout the year. In the same period, a total of 114,498,980 persons received at least one dose, and 71,862,108 people were fully vaccinated, amounting to 6.6% of the total population in the Region. Only 5 countries attained the target of 40% full vaccination coverage. Disaggregated information was not available from all countries on the number of persons vaccinated by gender, and according to the priority population groupings. A total of 102,046 cases of adverse events following immunisation (AEFIs) were reported among which 6,260 (6.1%) were labelled as severe AEFIs. CONCLUSION COVID-19 vaccination coverage remains very low in the African Region, with all but 5 countries missing the 40% coverage target as of December 2021. Countries, donors and partners should mobilise political will and resources towards the attainment of the coverage targets. Countries will need to implement vaccination efforts using tailored approaches to reach unreached populations. The reporting gaps indicate the need to invest on efforts to improve the capture, analysis and use of more granular program data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Balcha Masresha
- WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo,,Corresponding author: Balcha Masresha, WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
| | - Alain Poy
- WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo
| | - Goitom Weldegebriel
- WHO Inter-country Support Team for Eastern and Southern Africa, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | | | - Daniel Fussum
- WHO Inter-country Support Team for Eastern and Southern Africa, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Ado Bwaka
- WHO Inter-country Support Team for Western Africa, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
| | - Gilson Paluku
- WHO Inter-country Support Team for Central Africa, Libreville, Gabon
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Masresha B, Bwaka A, Mihigo R. Prioritization of operational research questions on COVID-19 vaccination in the African Region. Pan Afr Med J 2022; 41:4. [PMID: 36159021 PMCID: PMC9474931 DOI: 10.11604/pamj.supp.2022.41.2.33821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction a year after the start of COVID-19 vaccination, coverage remains very low in the African Region. Different challenges and operational barriers have been documented, but countries will need to supplement the available information with operational research in order to adequately respond to practical questions regarding how best to scale up COVID-19 vaccination. We conducted a survey among immunisation program staff working in the African Region, in order to identify the high priority operational research questions relevant to COVID-19 vaccination. Methods proposed operational research questions categorized into six topic areas were sent to resource persons, asking them to rate according to the relevance, urgency, feasibility, and potential impact of the research questions on the progress of COVID vaccination. Results a total of 25 research questions have been given an average weighted rating of 75% or more by the respondents. Nine of these top priority research questions were in the area of demand generation, risk communication and community engagement while 8 questions covered the area of service delivery. Conclusion countries should plan for and coordinate stakeholders to ensure that relevant operational research is done to respond to the top priority research questions, with a view to influence policies and implementation of strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Balcha Masresha
- World Health Organisation, African Regional Office, Brazzaville, Congo
| | - Ado Bwaka
- World Health Organisation, African Regional Office, Inter-country Support team for Western Africa, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
| | - Richard Mihigo
- World Health Organisation, African Regional Office, Brazzaville, Congo
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Masresha B, Ruiz MAS, Atuhebwe P, Mihigo R. The first year of COVID-19 vaccine roll-out in Africa: challenges and lessons learned. Pan Afr Med J 2022; 41:2. [PMID: 36159028 PMCID: PMC9474932 DOI: 10.11604/pamj.supp.2022.41.2.33686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction in the first year following the introduction of COVID-19 vaccines, only 6.8% of the total population in the 47 countries in the WHO African Region have received full vaccination. In an emergency context, the intra-action review helps countries to assess their progress and document what has worked and not worked. Methods we reviewed and identified the key lessons and challenges documented in the reports from intra-action review of COVID vaccine roll out in 22 African countries. Results all countries documented high level political commitment, but a serious shortage of COVID-19 vaccines and funding. Seven countries identified gaps in microplanning because of lack of funding or due to the unpredictability in the type and volume of vaccine supplies. The shortage of operational funding also affected training of health workers and hampered the expansion of service delivery. The countries implemented multi-channel communications and social mobilisation activities, alongside social media engagement and social listening. However, country capacity was limited in terms of timely responding to infodemics. Hesitancy among health workers and the general population was a challenge in most of the countries. Conclusion countries have gained valuable experiences exploring various COVID-19 vaccination delivery models, including implementing the integration of COVID-19 vaccination within routine health care programs. There is a need to regularly monitor or do studies measuring public perceptions towards COVID-19 vaccination in order to drive the demand generation efforts, as well as use evidence in addressing hesitancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Balcha Masresha
- World Health Organisation, African Regional Office, Brazzaville, Congo,,Corresponding author: Balcha Masresha, World Health Organisation, African Regional Office, Brazzaville, Congo.
| | - Miguel Angel Sanchez Ruiz
- ECDC Fellowship Programme, Field Epidemiology path (EPIET), European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Solna, Stockholm, Sweden,,Santé Publique France, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France
| | - Phionah Atuhebwe
- World Health Organisation, African Regional Office, Brazzaville, Congo
| | - Richard Mihigo
- World Health Organisation, African Regional Office, Brazzaville, Congo
| |
Collapse
|