1
|
Michel J, Manns A, Boudersa S, Jaubert C, Dupic L, Vivien B, Burgun A, Campeotto F, Tsopra R. Clinical decision support system in emergency telephone triage: A scoping review of technical design, implementation and evaluation. Int J Med Inform 2024; 184:105347. [PMID: 38290244 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/21/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Emergency department overcrowding could be improved by upstream telephone triage. Emergency telephone triage aims at managing and orientating adequately patients as early as possible and distributing limited supply of staff and materials. This complex task could be improved with the use of Clinical decision support systems (CDSS). The aim of this scoping review was to identify literature gaps for the future development and evaluation of CDSS for Emergency telephone triage. MATERIALS AND METHODS We present here a scoping review of CDSS designed for emergency telephone triage, and compared them in terms of functional characteristics, technical design, health care implementation and methodologies used for evaluation, following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. RESULTS Regarding design, 19 CDSS were retrieved: 12 were knowledge based CDSS (decisional algorithms built according to guidelines or clinical expertise) and 7 were data driven (statistical, machine learning, or deep learning models). Most of them aimed at assisting nurses or non-medical staff by providing patient orientation and/or severity/priority assessment. Eleven were implemented in real life, and only three were connected to the Electronic Health Record. Regarding evaluation, CDSS were assessed through various aspects: intrinsic characteristics, impact on clinical practice or user apprehension. Only one pragmatic trial and one randomized controlled trial were conducted. CONCLUSION This review highlights the potential of a hybrid system, user tailored, flexible, connected to the electronic health record, which could work with oral, video and digital data; and the need to evaluate CDSS on intrinsic characteristics and impact on clinical practice, iteratively at each distinct stage of the IT lifecycle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Michel
- SAMU 93-UF Recherche-Enseignement-Qualité, Université Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Inserm U942, Hôpital Avicenne, 125, rue de Stalingrad, 93009 Bobigny, France
| | - Aurélia Manns
- Université Paris Cité, Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, F-75006 Paris, France; Department of Medical Informatics, AP-HP, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou et Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, F-75015 Paris, France.
| | - Sofia Boudersa
- Department of Medical Informatics, AP-HP, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou et Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, F-75015 Paris, France
| | - Côme Jaubert
- Université Paris Cité, Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, F-75006 Paris, France
| | - Laurent Dupic
- Régulation Régionale Pédiatrique, SAMU de Paris, Hôpital Necker - Enfants Malades, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Benoit Vivien
- Digital Health Program of Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France; Régulation Régionale Pédiatrique, SAMU de Paris, Hôpital Necker - Enfants Malades, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Anita Burgun
- Université Paris Cité, Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, F-75006 Paris, France; Department of Medical Informatics, AP-HP, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou et Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, F-75015 Paris, France
| | - Florence Campeotto
- Digital Health Program of Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France; Régulation Régionale Pédiatrique, SAMU de Paris, Hôpital Necker - Enfants Malades, AP-HP, Paris, France; Faculté de Pharmacie, Université de Paris Cité, Inserm UMR S1139, Paris, France
| | - Rosy Tsopra
- Université Paris Cité, Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, F-75006 Paris, France; Department of Medical Informatics, AP-HP, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou et Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, F-75015 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Walsh CG, Ripperger MA, Novak L, Reale C, Anders S, Spann A, Kolli J, Robinson K, Chen Q, Isaacs D, Acosta LMY, Phibbs F, Fielstein E, Wilimitis D, Musacchio Schafer K, Hilton R, Albert D, Shelton J, Stroh J, Stead WW, Johnson KB. Randomized Controlled Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Risk Model-Guided Clinical Decision Support for Suicide Screening. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2024:2024.03.14.24304318. [PMID: 38562678 PMCID: PMC10984050 DOI: 10.1101/2024.03.14.24304318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
Suicide prevention requires risk identification, appropriate intervention, and follow-up. Traditional risk identification relies on patient self-reporting, support network reporting, or face-to-face screening with validated instruments or history and physical exam. In the last decade, statistical risk models have been studied and more recently deployed to augment clinical judgment. Models have generally been found to be low precision or problematic at scale due to low incidence. Few have been tested in clinical practice, and none have been tested in clinical trials to our knowledge. Methods We report the results of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) in three outpatient adult Neurology clinic settings. This two-arm trial compared the effectiveness of Interruptive and Non-Interruptive Clinical Decision Support (CDS) to prompt further screening of suicidal ideation for those predicted to be high risk using a real-time, validated statistical risk model of suicide attempt risk, with the decision to screen as the primary end point. Secondary outcomes included rates of suicidal ideation and attempts in both arms. Manual chart review of every trial encounter was used to determine if suicide risk assessment was subsequently documented. Results From August 16, 2022, through February 16, 2023, our study randomized 596 patient encounters across 561 patients for providers to receive either Interruptive or Non-Interruptive CDS in a 1:1 ratio. Adjusting for provider cluster effects, Interruptive CDS led to significantly higher numbers of decisions to screen (42%=121/289 encounters) compared to Non-Interruptive CDS (4%=12/307) (odds ratio=17.7, p-value <0.001). Secondarily, no documented episodes of suicidal ideation or attempts occurred in either arm. While the proportion of documented assessments among those noting the decision to screen was higher for providers in the Non-Interruptive arm (92%=11/12) than in the Interruptive arm (52%=63/121), the interruptive CDS was associated with more frequent documentation of suicide risk assessment (63/289 encounters compared to 11/307, p-value<0.001). Conclusions In this pragmatic RCT of real-time predictive CDS to guide suicide risk assessment, Interruptive CDS led to higher numbers of decisions to screen and documented suicide risk assessments. Well-powered large-scale trials randomizing this type of CDS compared to standard of care are indicated to measure effectiveness in reducing suicidal self-harm. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05312437.
Collapse
|
3
|
Hibi A, Cusimano MD, Bilbily A, Krishnan RG, Tyrrell PN. Impact of Automated Prognostication on Traumatic Brain Injury Care: A Focus Group Study. Can J Neurol Sci 2024:1-9. [PMID: 38438281 DOI: 10.1017/cjn.2024.24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prognosticating outcomes for traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients is challenging due to the required specialized skills and variability among clinicians. Recent attempts to standardize TBI prognosis have leveraged machine learning (ML) methodologies. This study evaluates the necessity and influence of ML-assisted TBI prognostication through healthcare professionals' perspectives via focus group discussions. METHODS Two virtual focus groups included ten key TBI care stakeholders (one neurosurgeon, two emergency clinicians, one internist, two radiologists, one registered nurse, two researchers in ML and healthcare and one patient representative). They answered six open-ended questions about their perceptions and potential ML use in TBI prognostication. Transcribed focus group discussions were thematically analyzed using qualitative data analysis software. RESULTS The study captured diverse perceptions and interests in TBI prognostication across clinical specialties. Notably, certain clinicians who currently do not prognosticate expressed an interest in doing so independently provided they had access to ML support. Concerns included ML's accuracy and the need for proficient ML researchers in clinical settings. The consensus suggested using ML as a secondary consultation tool and promoting collaboration with internal or external research resources. Participants believed ML prognostication could enhance disposition planning and standardize care regardless of clinician expertise or injury severity. There was no evidence of perceived bias or interference during the discussions. CONCLUSION Our findings revealed an overall positive attitude toward ML-based prognostication. Despite raising multiple concerns, the focus group discussions were particularly valuable in underscoring the potential of ML in democratizing and standardizing TBI prognosis practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atsuhiro Hibi
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Neurosurgery, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Michael D Cusimano
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Neurosurgery, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Alexander Bilbily
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Rahul G Krishnan
- Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Pascal N Tyrrell
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kling SMR, Kalwani NM, Winget M, Gupta K, Saliba-Gustafsson EA, Baratta J, Garvert DW, Veruttipong D, Brown-Johnson CG, Vilendrer S, Gaspar C, Levin E, Tsai S. An initiative to promote value-based stress test selection in primary care and cardiology clinics: A mixed methods evaluation. J Eval Clin Pract 2024; 30:107-118. [PMID: 37459156 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Revised: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Exercise stress echocardiograms (stress echos) are overused, whereas exercise stress electrocardiograms (stress ECGs) can be an appropriate, lower-cost substitute. In this post hoc, mixed methods evaluation, we assessed an initiative promoting value-based, guideline-concordant ordering practices in primary care (PC) and cardiology clinics. METHODS Change in percent of stress ECGs ordered of all exercise stress tests (stress ECGs and echos) was calculated between three periods: baseline (January 2019-February 2020); Period 1 with reduced stress ECG report turnaround time + PC-targeted education (began June 2020); and Period 2 with the addition of electronic health record-based alternative alert (AA) providing point-of-care clinical decision support. The AA was deployed in two of five PC clinics in July 2020, two additional PC clinics in January 2021, and one of four cardiology clinics in February 2021. Nineteen primary care providers (PCPs) and five cardiologists were interviewed in Period 2. RESULTS Clinicians reported reducing ECG report turnaround time was crucial for adoption. PCPs specifically reported that value-based education helped change their practice. In PC, the percent of stress ECGs ordered increased by 38% ± 6% (SE) (p < 0.0001) from baseline to Period 1. Most PCPs identified the AA as the most impactful initiative, yet stress ECG ordering did not change (6% ± 6%; p = 0.34) between Periods 1 and 2. In contrast, cardiologists reportedly relied on their expertise rather than AAs, yet their stress ECGs orders increased from Period 1 to 2 to a larger degree in the cardiology clinic with the AA (12% ± 5%; p = 0.01) than clinics without the AA (6% ± 2%; p = 0.01). The percent of stress ECGs ordered was higher in Period 2 than baseline for both specialties (both p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS This initiative influenced ordering behaviour in PC and cardiology clinics. However, clinicians' perceptions of the initiative varied between specialties and did not always align with the observed behaviour change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha M R Kling
- Evaluation Sciences Unit, Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Neil M Kalwani
- Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, USA
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Marcy Winget
- Evaluation Sciences Unit, Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Kush Gupta
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Erika A Saliba-Gustafsson
- Evaluation Sciences Unit, Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Juliana Baratta
- Evaluation Sciences Unit, Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Donn W Garvert
- Evaluation Sciences Unit, Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Darlene Veruttipong
- Evaluation Sciences Unit, Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Cati G Brown-Johnson
- Evaluation Sciences Unit, Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Stacie Vilendrer
- Evaluation Sciences Unit, Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
- Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California, USA
| | | | - Eleanor Levin
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
- Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Sandra Tsai
- Evaluation Sciences Unit, Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
- Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sommers S, Tolle H, Napier C, Hoppe J. Targeted messaging to improve the adoption of clinical decision support for prescription drug monitoring program use. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2023; 30:1711-1716. [PMID: 37433582 PMCID: PMC10531197 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocad127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Clinical decision support (CDS) can prevent medical errors and improve patient outcomes. Electronic health record (EHR)-based CDS, designed to facilitate prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP) review, has reduced inappropriate opioid prescribing. However, the pooled effectiveness of CDS has exhibited substantial heterogeneity and current literature does not adequately detail why certain CDS are more successful than others. Clinicians regularly override CDS, limiting its impact. No studies recommend how to help nonadopters recognize and recover from CDS misuse. We hypothesized that a targeted educational intervention would improve CDS adoption and effectiveness for nonadopters. Over 10 months, we identified 478 providers consistently overriding CDS (nonadopters) and sent each up to 3 educational message(s) via email or EHR-based chat. One hundred sixty-one (34%) nonadopters stopped consistently overriding CDS and started reviewing the PDMP after contact. We concluded that targeted messaging is a low-resource way to disseminate CDS education and improve CDS adoption and best practice delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart Sommers
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Heather Tolle
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Cheryl Napier
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Jason Hoppe
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ager EE, Sturdavant W, Curry Z, Ahmed F, DeJonckheere M, Gutting AA, Merchant RC, Kocher KE, Solnick RE. Mixed-methods Evaluation of an Expedited Partner Therapy Take-home Medication Program: Pilot Emergency Department Intervention to Improve Sexual Health Equity. West J Emerg Med 2023; 24:993-1004. [PMID: 37788042 PMCID: PMC10527844 DOI: 10.5811/westjem.59506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Treatment for partners of patients diagnosed with sexually transmitted infections (STI), referred to as expedited partner therapy (EPT), is infrequently used in the emergency department (ED). This was a pilot program to initiate and evaluate EPT through medication-in-hand ("take-home") kits or paper prescriptions. In this study we aimed to assess the frequency of EPT prescribing, the efficacy of a randomized best practice advisory (BPA) on the uptake, perceptions of emergency clinicians regarding the EPT pilot, and factors associated with EPT prescribing. Methods: We conducted this pilot study at an academic ED in the midwestern US between August-October 2021. The primary outcome of EPT prescription uptake and the BPA impact was measured via chart abstraction and analyzed through summary statistics and the Fisher exact test. We analyzed the secondary outcome of barriers and facilitators to program implementation through ED staff interviews (physicians, physician assistants, and nurses). We used a rapid qualitative assessment method for the analysis of the interviews. Results: During the study period, 52 ED patients were treated for chlamydia/gonorrhea, and EPT was offered to 25% (95% CI 15%-39%) of them. Expedited partner therapy was prescribed significantly more often (42% vs 8%; P < 0.01) when the interruptive pop-up alert BPA was shown compared to not shown. Barriers identified in the interviews included workflow constraints and knowledge of EPT availability. The BPA was viewed positively by the majority of participants. Conclusion: In this pilot EPT program, expedited partner therapy was provided to 25% of ED patients who appeared eligible to receive it. The interruptive pop-up alert BPA significantly increased EPT prescribing. Barriers identified to EPT prescribing should be the subject of future interventions to improve provision of EPT from the emergency department.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily E Ager
- University of Michigan, School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - William Sturdavant
- University of Michigan, School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Zoe Curry
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Fahmida Ahmed
- University of Michigan, School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Melissa DeJonckheere
- University of Michigan, School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Andrew A Gutting
- University of Michigan, Michigan Medicine, Department of Clinical Quality, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | - Keith E Kocher
- University of Michigan, School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- University of Michigan, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jeffries M, Salema NE, Laing L, Shamsuddin A, Sheikh A, Avery T, Chuter A, Waring J, Keers RN. Using sociotechnical theory to understand medication safety work in primary care and prescribers' use of clinical decision support: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e068798. [PMID: 37105697 PMCID: PMC10151989 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The concept of safety work draws attention to the intentional work of ensuring safety within care systems. Clinical decision support (CDS) has been designed to enhance medication safety in primary care by providing decision-making support to prescribers. Sociotechnical theory understands that healthcare settings are complex and dynamically connected systems of fluid networks, human agents, changing relationships and social processes. This study aimed to understand the relationship between safety work and the use of CDS. DESIGN AND SETTING This qualitative study took place across nine different general practices in England. Stakeholders included general practitioners (GPs) and general practice-based pharmacists and nurse prescribers. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to illicit how the system was used by the participants in the context of medication safety work. Data analysis conducted alongside data collection was thematic and drew on socio-technical theory. PARTICIPANTS Twenty-three interviews were conducted with 14 GPs, three nurse prescribers and three practice pharmacists between February 2018 and June 2020. RESULTS Safety work was contextually situated in a complex network of relationships. Three interconnected themes were interpreted from the data: (1) the use of CDS within organisational and social practices and workflows; (2) safety work and the use of CDS within the interplay between prescribers, patients and populations; and (3) the affordances embedded in CDS systems. CONCLUSION The use of sociotechnical theory here extends current thinking in patient safety particularly in the ways that safety work was co-constituted with the use of CDS alerts. This has implications for implementation and use to ensure that the contexts into which such CDS systems are implemented are taken into account. Understanding how alerts can adapt safety culture will help improve the efficacy of CDS systems, enhance prescribing safety and help to further understand how safety work is achieved in primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Jeffries
- NIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Nde-Eshimuni Salema
- NIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Division of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Libby Laing
- NIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Division of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Aziz Sheikh
- Division of Community Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Tony Avery
- NIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Division of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Antony Chuter
- Division of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Justin Waring
- School of Social Policy, Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Richard Neil Keers
- Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Suicide, Risk and Safety Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Seliaman ME, Albahly MS. The Reasons for Physicians and Pharmacists' Acceptance of Clinical Support Systems in Saudi Arabia. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:3132. [PMID: 36833832 PMCID: PMC9962582 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20043132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
This research aims to identify the technological and non-technological factors influencing user acceptance of the CDSS in a group of healthcare facilities in Saudi Arabia. The study proposes an integrated model that indicates the factors to be considered when designing and evaluating CDSS. This model is developed by integrating factors from the "Fit between Individuals, Task, and Technology" (FITT) framework into the three domains of the human, organization, and technology-fit (HOT-fit) model. The resulting FITT-HOT-fit integrated model was tested using a quantitative approach to evaluate the currently implemented CDSS as a part of Hospital Information System BESTCare 2.0 in the Saudi Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs. For data collection, a survey questionnaire was conducted at all Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs hospitals. Then, the collected survey data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). This analysis included measurement instrument reliability, discriminant validity, convergent validity, and hypothesis testing. Moreover, a CDSS usage data sample was extracted from the data warehouse to be analyzed as an additional data source. The results of the hypotheses test show that usability, availability, and medical history accessibility are critical factors influencing user acceptance of CDSS. This study provides prudence about healthcare facilities and their higher management to adopt CDSS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Elhassan Seliaman
- Department of Information Systems, College of Computer Science and Information Technology, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fletcher E, Burns A, Wiering B, Lavu D, Shephard E, Hamilton W, Campbell JL, Abel G. Workload and workflow implications associated with the use of electronic clinical decision support tools used by health professionals in general practice: a scoping review. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2023; 24:23. [PMID: 36670354 PMCID: PMC9857918 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-023-01973-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electronic clinical decision support tools (eCDS) are increasingly available to assist General Practitioners (GP) with the diagnosis and management of a range of health conditions. It is unclear whether the use of eCDS tools has an impact on GP workload. This scoping review aimed to identify the available evidence on the use of eCDS tools by health professionals in general practice in relation to their impact on workload and workflow. METHODS A scoping review was carried out using the Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework. The search strategy was developed iteratively, with three main aspects: general practice/primary care contexts, risk assessment/decision support tools, and workload-related factors. Three databases were searched in 2019, and updated in 2021, covering articles published since 2009: Medline (Ovid), HMIC (Ovid) and Web of Science (TR). Double screening was completed by two reviewers, and data extracted from included articles were analysed. RESULTS The search resulted in 5,594 references, leading to 95 full articles, referring to 87 studies, after screening. Of these, 36 studies were based in the USA, 21 in the UK and 11 in Australia. A further 18 originated from Canada or Europe, with the remaining studies conducted in New Zealand, South Africa and Malaysia. Studies examined the use of eCDS tools and reported some findings related to their impact on workload, including on consultation duration. Most studies were qualitative and exploratory in nature, reporting health professionals' subjective perceptions of consultation duration as opposed to objectively-measured time spent using tools or consultation durations. Other workload-related findings included impacts on cognitive workload, "workflow" and dialogue with patients, and clinicians' experience of "alert fatigue". CONCLUSIONS The published literature on the impact of eCDS tools in general practice showed that limited efforts have focused on investigating the impact of such tools on workload and workflow. To gain an understanding of this area, further research, including quantitative measurement of consultation durations, would be useful to inform the future design and implementation of eCDS tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Fletcher
- grid.8391.30000 0004 1936 8024College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, Devon EX1 2LU England
| | - Alex Burns
- grid.8391.30000 0004 1936 8024College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, Devon EX1 2LU England
| | - Bianca Wiering
- grid.8391.30000 0004 1936 8024College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, Devon EX1 2LU England
| | - Deepthi Lavu
- grid.8391.30000 0004 1936 8024College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, Devon EX1 2LU England
| | - Elizabeth Shephard
- grid.8391.30000 0004 1936 8024College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, Devon EX1 2LU England
| | - Willie Hamilton
- grid.8391.30000 0004 1936 8024College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, Devon EX1 2LU England
| | - John L. Campbell
- grid.8391.30000 0004 1936 8024College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, Devon EX1 2LU England
| | - Gary Abel
- grid.8391.30000 0004 1936 8024College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, Devon EX1 2LU England
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ho VT, Aikens RC, Tso G, Heidenreich PA, Sharp C, Asch SM, Chen JH, Shah NK. Interruptive Electronic Alerts for Choosing Wisely Recommendations: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2022; 29:1941-1948. [PMID: 36018731 PMCID: PMC10161518 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocac139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Revised: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy of interruptive electronic alerts in improving adherence to the American Board of Internal Medicine's Choosing Wisely recommendations to reduce unnecessary laboratory testing. MATERIALS AND METHODS We administered 5 cluster randomized controlled trials simultaneously, using electronic medical record alerts regarding prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, acute sinusitis treatment, vitamin D testing, carotid artery ultrasound screening, and human papillomavirus testing. For each alert, we assigned 5 outpatient clinics to an interruptive alert and 5 were observed as a control. Primary and secondary outcomes were the number of postalert orders per 100 patients at each clinic and number of triggered alerts divided by orders, respectively. Post hoc analysis evaluated whether physicians experiencing interruptive alerts reduced their alert-triggering behaviors. RESULTS Median postalert orders per 100 patients did not differ significantly between treatment and control groups; absolute median differences ranging from 0.04 to 0.40 for PSA testing. Median alerts per 100 orders did not differ significantly between treatment and control groups; absolute median differences ranged from 0.004 to 0.03. In post hoc analysis, providers receiving alerts regarding PSA testing in men were significantly less likely to trigger additional PSA alerts than those in the control sites (Incidence Rate Ratio 0.12, 95% CI [0.03-0.52]). DISCUSSION Interruptive point-of-care alerts did not yield detectable changes in the overall rate of undesired orders or the order-to-alert ratio between active and silent sites. Complementary behavioral or educational interventions are likely needed to improve efforts to curb medical overuse. CONCLUSION Implementation of interruptive alerts at the time of ordering was not associated with improved adherence to 5 Choosing Wisely guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT02709772.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vy T Ho
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Rachael C Aikens
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Geoffrey Tso
- Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Paul A Heidenreich
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Christopher Sharp
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Steven M Asch
- Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Jonathan H Chen
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Neil K Shah
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lyons PG, Singh K. Lessons in machine learning model deployment learned from sepsis. MED 2022; 3:597-599. [PMID: 36087573 DOI: 10.1016/j.medj.2022.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
In three recent and related publications, researchers from Johns Hopkins University and Bayesian Health report results from implementing and prospectively evaluating the Targeted Real-time Early Warning System (TREWS) for sepsis at five hospitals.1-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick G Lyons
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; Healthcare Innovation Lab, BJC HealthCare, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
| | - Karandeep Singh
- Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Department of Urology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Garabedian PM, Gannon MP, Aaron S, Wu E, Burns Z, Samal L. Human-centered design of clinical decision support for management of hypertension with chronic kidney disease. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2022; 22:217. [PMID: 35964083 PMCID: PMC9375189 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-022-01962-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Primary care providers face challenges in recognizing and controlling hypertension in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Clinical decision support (CDS) has the potential to aid clinicians in identifying patients who could benefit from medication changes. This study designed an alert to control hypertension in CKD patients using an iterative human-centered design process. Methods In this study, we present a human-centered design process employing multiple methods for gathering user requirements and feedback on design and usability. Initially, we conducted contextual inquiry sessions to gather user requirements for the CDS. This was followed by group design sessions and one-on-one formative think-aloud sessions to validate requirements, obtain feedback on the design and layout, uncover usability issues, and validate changes. Results This study included 20 participants. The contextual inquiry produced 10 user requirements which influenced the initial alert design. The group design sessions revealed issues related to several themes, including recommendations and clinical content that did not match providers' expectations and extraneous information on the alerts that did not provide value. Findings from the individual think-aloud sessions revealed that participants disagreed with some recommended clinical actions, requested additional information, and had concerns about the placement in their workflow. Following each step, iterative changes were made to the alert content and design. Discussion This study showed that participation from users throughout the design process can lead to a better understanding of user requirements and optimal design, even within the constraints of an EHR alerting system. While raising awareness of design needs, it also revealed concerns related to workflow, understandability, and relevance. Conclusion The human-centered design framework using multiple methods for CDS development informed the creation of an alert to assist in the treatment and recognition of hypertension in patients with CKD. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-022-01962-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela M Garabedian
- Mass General Brigham, 399 Revolution Drive, Somerville, MA, 857-282-4091, USA.
| | - Michael P Gannon
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Skye Aaron
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Edward Wu
- Alabama College of Osteopathic Medicine, Dothan, AL, USA
| | - Zoe Burns
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lipika Samal
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Román-Villarán E, Alvarez-Romero C, Martínez-García A, Escobar-Rodríguez GA, García-Lozano MJ, Barón-Franco B, Moreno-Gaviño L, Moreno-Conde J, Rivas-González JA, Parra-Calderón CL. A Personalized Ontology-Based Decision Support System for Complex Chronic Patients: Retrospective Observational Study. JMIR Form Res 2022; 6:e27990. [PMID: 35916719 PMCID: PMC9382545 DOI: 10.2196/27990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Revised: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to an increase in life expectancy, the prevalence of chronic diseases is also on the rise. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) provide recommendations for suitable interventions regarding different chronic diseases, but a deficiency in the implementation of these CPGs has been identified. The PITeS-TiiSS (Telemedicine and eHealth Innovation Platform: Information Communications Technology for Research and Information Challenges in Health Services) tool, a personalized ontology-based clinical decision support system (CDSS), aims to reduce variability, prevent errors, and consider interactions between different CPG recommendations, among other benefits. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to design, develop, and validate an ontology-based CDSS that provides personalized recommendations related to drug prescription. The target population is older adult patients with chronic diseases and polypharmacy, and the goal is to reduce complications related to these types of conditions while offering integrated care. METHODS A study scenario about atrial fibrillation and treatment with anticoagulants was selected to validate the tool. After this, a series of knowledge sources were identified, including CPGs, PROFUND index, LESS/CHRON criteria, and STOPP/START criteria, to extract the information. Modeling was carried out using an ontology, and mapping was done with Health Level 7 Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (HL7 FHIR) and Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT; International Health Terminology Standards Development Organisation). Once the CDSS was developed, validation was carried out by using a retrospective case study. RESULTS This project was funded in January 2015 and approved by the Virgen del Rocio University Hospital ethics committee on November 24, 2015. Two different tasks were carried out to test the functioning of the tool. First, retrospective data from a real patient who met the inclusion criteria were used. Second, the analysis of an adoption model was performed through the study of the requirements and characteristics that a CDSS must meet in order to be well accepted and used by health professionals. The results are favorable and allow the proposed research to continue to the next phase. CONCLUSIONS An ontology-based CDSS was successfully designed, developed, and validated. However, in future work, validation in a real environment should be performed to ensure the tool is usable and reliable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Román-Villarán
- Computational Health Informatics Group, Institute of Biomedicine of Seville, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| | - Celia Alvarez-Romero
- Computational Health Informatics Group, Institute of Biomedicine of Seville, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| | - Alicia Martínez-García
- Computational Health Informatics Group, Institute of Biomedicine of Seville, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| | - German Antonio Escobar-Rodríguez
- Computational Health Informatics Group, Institute of Biomedicine of Seville, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| | | | - Bosco Barón-Franco
- Internal Medicine Department, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Seville, Spain
| | | | - Jesús Moreno-Conde
- Computational Health Informatics Group, Institute of Biomedicine of Seville, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| | - José Antonio Rivas-González
- Computational Health Informatics Group, Institute of Biomedicine of Seville, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| | - Carlos Luis Parra-Calderón
- Computational Health Informatics Group, Institute of Biomedicine of Seville, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Allen KS, Danielson EC, Downs SM, Mazurenko O, Diiulio J, Salloum RG, Mamlin BW, Harle CA. Evaluating a Prototype Clinical Decision Support Tool for Chronic Pain Treatment in Primary Care. Appl Clin Inform 2022; 13:602-611. [PMID: 35649500 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1749332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The Chronic Pain Treatment Tracker (Tx Tracker) is a prototype decision support tool to aid primary care clinicians when caring for patients with chronic noncancer pain. This study evaluated clinicians' perceived utility of Tx Tracker in meeting information needs and identifying treatment options, and preferences for visual design. METHODS We conducted 12 semi-structured interviews with primary care clinicians from four health systems in Indiana. The interviews were conducted in two waves, with prototype and interview guide revisions after the first six interviews. The interviews included exploration of Tx Tracker using a think-aloud approach and a clinical scenario. Clinicians were presented with a patient scenario and asked to use Tx Tracker to make a treatment recommendation. Last, participants answered several evaluation questions. Detailed field notes were collected, coded, and thematically analyzed by four analysts. RESULTS We identified several themes: the need for clinicians to be presented with a comprehensive patient history, the usefulness of Tx Tracker in patient discussions about treatment planning, potential usefulness of Tx Tracker for patients with high uncertainty or risk, potential usefulness of Tx Tracker in aggregating scattered information, variability in expectations about workflows, skepticism about underlying electronic health record data quality, interest in using Tx Tracker to annotate or update information, interest in using Tx Tracker to translate information to clinical action, desire for interface with visual cues for risks, warnings, or treatment options, and desire for interactive functionality. CONCLUSION Tools like Tx Tracker, by aggregating key information about past, current, and potential future treatments, may help clinicians collaborate with their patients in choosing the best pain treatments. Still, the use and usefulness of Tx Tracker likely relies on continued improvement of its functionality, accurate and complete underlying data, and tailored integration with varying workflows, care team roles, and user preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie S Allen
- Health Policy and Management, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, IUPUI, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States.,Center for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
| | - Elizabeth C Danielson
- Center for Education in Health Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States
| | - Sarah M Downs
- Division of Internal Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
| | - Olena Mazurenko
- Health Policy and Management, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, IUPUI, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
| | - Julie Diiulio
- Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, Applied Decision Science, LLC, Dayton, Ohio, United States
| | | | - Burke W Mamlin
- Center for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, United States.,Division of Internal Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
| | - Christopher A Harle
- Center for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, United States.,University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bates DW, Cheng HY, Cheung NT, Jew R, Mir F, Tamblyn R, Li YC. ‘Improving smart medication management’: an online expert discussion. BMJ Health Care Inform 2022; 29:bmjhci-2021-100540. [PMID: 35477691 PMCID: PMC9047882 DOI: 10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Medication safety continues to be a problem inside and outside the hospital, partly because new smart technologies can cause new drug-related challenges to prescribers and patients. Better integrated digital and information technology (IT) systems, improved education on prescribing for prescribers and greater patient-centred care that empowers patients to take control of their medications are all vital to safer and more effective prescribing. In July 2021, a roundtable discussion was held as a spin-off meeting of the International Forum on Quality and Safety in Health Care Europe 2021 to discuss challenges and future direction in smart medication management. This manuscript summarises the discussion focusing on the aspects of digital and IT systems, safe prescribing, improved communication and education, and drug adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David W Bates
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - N T Cheung
- Hong Kong Hospital Authority, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Rita Jew
- ISMP, Horsham, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Fraz Mir
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kao DP. Electronic Health Records and Heart Failure. Heart Fail Clin 2022; 18:201-211. [PMID: 35341535 PMCID: PMC9167063 DOI: 10.1016/j.hfc.2021.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Increasing the global adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) is transforming the delivery of clinical care. EHRs offer tools that are useful in the care of heart failure ranging from individualized risk stratification and decision support to population management. EHR tools can be combined to target specific areas of need such as the standardization of care, improved quality of care, and resource management. Leveraging EHR functionality has been shown to improve select outcomes including guideline-based therapies, reduction in adverse clinical outcomes, and improved cost-efficiency. Central to success is participation by clinicians and patients in the design and feedback of EHR tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David P Kao
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12700 East 19th Avenue Box B-139, Research Center 2 Room 8005, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
A Coding Framework for Usability Evaluation of Digital Health Technologies. HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION. THEORETICAL APPROACHES AND DESIGN METHODS 2022; 13302:185-196. [PMID: 36037053 PMCID: PMC9413016 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-05311-5_12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Several studies have reported low adherence and high resistance from clinicians to adopt digital health technologies into clinical practice, particularly the use of computer-based clinical decision support systems. Poor usability and lack of integration with the clinical workflow have been identified as primary issues. Few guidelines exist on how to analyze the collected data associated with the usability of digital health technologies. In this study, we aimed to develop a coding framework for the systematic evaluation of users' feedback generated during focus groups and interview sessions with clinicians, underpinned by fundamental usability principles and design components. This codebook also included a coding category to capture the user's clinical role associated with each specific piece of feedback, providing a better understanding of role-specific challenges and perspectives, as well as the level of shared understanding across the multiple clinical roles. Furthermore, a voting system was created to quantitatively inform modifications of the digital system based on usability data. As a use case, we applied this method to an electronic cognitive aid designed to improve coordination and communication in the cardiac operating room, showing that this framework is feasible and useful not only to better understand suboptimal usability aspects, but also to recommend relevant modifications in the design and development of the system from different perspectives, including clinical, technical, and usability teams. The framework described herein may be applied in other highly complex clinical settings, in which digital health systems may play an important role in improving patient care and enhancing patient safety.
Collapse
|
18
|
Olakotan OO, Yusof MM. Evaluating the appropriateness of clinical decision support alerts: A case study. J Eval Clin Pract 2021; 27:868-876. [PMID: 33009698 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Revised: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES Clinical decision support (CDS) generates excessive alerts that disrupt the workflow of clinicians. Therefore, inefficient clinical processes that contribute to the misfit between CDS alert and workflow must be evaluated. This study evaluates the appropriateness of CDS alerts in supporting clinical workflow from a socio-technical perspective. METHOD A qualitative case study evaluation was conducted at a 620-bed public teaching hospital in Malaysia using interview, observation, and document analysis to investigate the features and functions of alert appropriateness and workflow-related issues in cardiological and dermatological settings. The current state map for medication prescribing process was also modelled to identify problems pertinent to CDS alert appropriateness. RESULTS The main findings showed that CDS was not well designed to fit into a clinician's workflow due to influencing factors such as technology (usability, alert content, and alert timing), human (training, perception, knowledge, and skills), organizational (rules and regulations, privacy, and security), and processes (documenting patient information, overriding default option, waste, and delay) impeding the use of CDS with its alert function. We illustrated how alert affect workflow in clinical processes using a Lean tool known as value stream mapping. This study also proposes how CDS alerts should be integrated into clinical workflows to optimize their potential to enhance patient safety. CONCLUSION The design and implementation of CDS alerts should be aligned with and incorporate socio-technical factors. Process improvement methods such as Lean can be used to enhance the appropriateness of CDS alerts by identifying inefficient clinical processes that impede the fit of these alerts into clinical workflow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olufisayo O Olakotan
- Faculty of Information Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia
| | - Maryati M Yusof
- Faculty of Information Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
The implementation, use and sustainability of a clinical decision support system for medication optimisation in primary care: A qualitative evaluation. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0250946. [PMID: 33939750 PMCID: PMC8092789 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The quality and safety of prescribing in general practice is important, Clinical decision support (CDS) systems can be used which present alerts to health professionals when prescribing in order to identify patients at risk of potentially hazardous prescribing. It is known that such computerised alerts may improve the safety of prescribing in hospitals but their implementation and sustainable use in general practice is less well understood. We aimed to understand the factors that influenced the successful implementation and sustained use in primary care of a CDS system. Methods Participants were purposively recruited from Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) and general practices in the North West and East Midlands regions of England and from the CDS developers. We conducted face-to-face and telephone-based semi-structured qualitative interviews with staff stakeholders. A selection of participants was interviewed longitudinally to explore the further sustainability 1–2 years after implementation of the CDS system. The analysis, informed by Normalisation Process Theory (NPT), was thematic, iterative and conducted alongside data collection. Results Thirty-nine interviews were conducted either individually or in groups, with 33 stakeholders, including 11 follow-up interviews. Eight themes were interpreted in alignment with the four NPT constructs: Coherence (The purpose of the CDS: Enhancing medication safety and improving cost effectiveness; Relationship of users to the technology; Engagement and communication between different stakeholders); Cognitive Participation (Management of the profile of alerts); Collective Action (Prescribing in general practice, patient and population characteristics and engagement with patients; Knowledge);and Reflexive Monitoring (Sustaining the use of the CDS through maintenance and customisation; Learning and behaviour change. Participants saw that the CDS could have a role in enhancing medication safety and in the quality of care. Engagement through communication and support for local primary care providers and management leaders was considered important for successful implementation. Management of prescribing alert profiles for general practices was a dynamic process evolving over time. At regional management levels, work was required to adapt, and modify the system to optimise its use in practice and fulfil local priorities. Contextual factors, including patient and population characteristics, could impact upon the decision-making processes of prescribers influencing the response to alerts. The CDS could operate as a knowledge base allowing prescribers access to evidence-based information that they otherwise would not have. Conclusions This qualitative evaluation utilised NPT to understand the implementation, use and sustainability of a widely deployed CDS system offering prescribing alerts in general practice. The system was understood as having a role in medication safety in providing relevant patient specific information to prescribers in a timely manner. Engagement between stakeholders was considered important for the intervention in ensuring prescribers continued to utilise its functionality. Sustained implementation might be enhanced by careful profile management of the suite of alerts in the system. Our findings suggest that the use and sustainability of the CDS was related to prescribers’ perceptions of the relevance of alerts. Shared understanding of the purpose of the CDS between CCGS and general practices particularly in balancing cost saving and safety messages could be beneficial.
Collapse
|
20
|
Trinkley KE, Kroehl ME, Kahn MG, Allen LA, Bennett TD, Hale G, Haugen H, Heckman S, Kao DP, Kim J, Matlock DM, Malone DC, Page Nd RL, Stine J, Suresh K, Wells L, Lin CT. Applying Clinical Decision Support Design Best Practices With the Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model Versus Reliance on Commercially Available Clinical Decision Support Tools: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Med Inform 2021; 9:e24359. [PMID: 33749610 PMCID: PMC8077777 DOI: 10.2196/24359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Revised: 12/07/2020] [Accepted: 01/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Limited consideration of clinical decision support (CDS) design best practices, such as a user-centered design, is often cited as a key barrier to CDS adoption and effectiveness. The application of CDS best practices is resource intensive; thus, institutions often rely on commercially available CDS tools that are created to meet the generalized needs of many institutions and are not user centered. Beyond resource availability, insufficient guidance on how to address key aspects of implementation, such as contextual factors, may also limit the application of CDS best practices. An implementation science (IS) framework could provide needed guidance and increase the reproducibility of CDS implementations. OBJECTIVE This study aims to compare the effectiveness of an enhanced CDS tool informed by CDS best practices and an IS framework with a generic, commercially available CDS tool. METHODS We conducted an explanatory sequential mixed methods study. An IS-enhanced and commercial CDS alert were compared in a cluster randomized trial across 28 primary care clinics. Both alerts aimed to improve beta-blocker prescribing for heart failure. The enhanced alert was informed by CDS best practices and the Practical, Robust, Implementation, and Sustainability Model (PRISM) IS framework, whereas the commercial alert followed vendor-supplied specifications. Following PRISM, the enhanced alert was informed by iterative, multilevel stakeholder input and the dynamic interactions of the internal and external environment. Outcomes aligned with PRISM's evaluation measures, including patient reach, clinician adoption, and changes in prescribing behavior. Clinicians exposed to each alert were interviewed to identify design features that might influence adoption. The interviews were analyzed using a thematic approach. RESULTS Between March 15 and August 23, 2019, the enhanced alert fired for 61 patients (106 alerts, 87 clinicians) and the commercial alert fired for 26 patients (59 alerts, 31 clinicians). The adoption and effectiveness of the enhanced alert were significantly higher than those of the commercial alert (62% vs 29% alerts adopted, P<.001; 14% vs 0% changed prescribing, P=.006). Of the 21 clinicians interviewed, most stated that they preferred the enhanced alert. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study suggest that applying CDS best practices with an IS framework to create CDS tools improves implementation success compared with a commercially available tool. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04028557; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04028557.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katy E Trinkley
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
- Adult and Child Consortium for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
- Department of Clinical Informatics, University of Colorado Health, Aurora, CO, United States
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Miranda E Kroehl
- Charter Communications Corporation, Greenwood Village, CO, United States
| | - Michael G Kahn
- Section of Informatics and Data Science, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Larry A Allen
- Adult and Child Consortium for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Tellen D Bennett
- Adult and Child Consortium for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
- Section of Informatics and Data Science, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Gary Hale
- Department of Clinical Informatics, University of Colorado Health, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Heather Haugen
- University of Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Simeon Heckman
- Department of Clinical Informatics, University of Colorado Health, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - David P Kao
- Department of Clinical Informatics, University of Colorado Health, Aurora, CO, United States
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Janet Kim
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Daniel M Matlock
- Adult and Child Consortium for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
- VA Eastern Colorado Geriastric Research Education and Clinical Center, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Daniel C Malone
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, Skaggs College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Robert L Page Nd
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Jessica Stine
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Krithika Suresh
- Adult and Child Consortium for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Lauren Wells
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Chen-Tan Lin
- Department of Clinical Informatics, University of Colorado Health, Aurora, CO, United States
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Dowding D, Russell D, McDonald MV, Trifilio M, Song J, Brickner C, Shang J. "A catalyst for action": Factors for implementing clinical risk prediction models of infection in home care settings. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28:334-341. [PMID: 33260204 PMCID: PMC7883974 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Revised: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The study sought to outline how a clinical risk prediction model for identifying patients at risk of infection is perceived by home care nurses, and to inform how the output of the model could be integrated into a clinical workflow. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with 50 home care nurses. Interviews explored nurses' perceptions of clinical risk prediction models, their experiences using them in practice, and what elements are important for the implementation of a clinical risk prediction model focusing on infection. Interviews were audio-taped and transcribed, with data evaluated using thematic analysis. RESULTS Two themes were derived from the data: (1) informing nursing practice, which outlined how a clinical risk prediction model could inform nurse clinical judgment and be used to modify their care plan interventions, and (2) operationalizing the score, which summarized how the clinical risk prediction model could be incorporated in home care settings. DISCUSSION The findings indicate that home care nurses would find a clinical risk prediction model for infection useful, as long as it provided both context around the reasons why a patient was deemed to be at high risk and provided some guidance for action. CONCLUSIONS It is important to evaluate the potential feasibility and acceptability of a clinical risk prediction model, to inform the intervention design and implementation strategy. The results of this study can provide guidance for the development of the clinical risk prediction tool as an intervention for integration in home care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dawn Dowding
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - David Russell
- Department of Sociology, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina, USA
- Center for Home Care Policy and Research, Visiting Nurse Service of New York, New York, New York, USA
| | - Margaret V McDonald
- Center for Home Care Policy and Research, Visiting Nurse Service of New York, New York, New York, USA
| | - Marygrace Trifilio
- Center for Home Care Policy and Research, Visiting Nurse Service of New York, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jiyoun Song
- Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York, USA
| | - Carlin Brickner
- Center for Home Care Policy and Research, Visiting Nurse Service of New York, New York, New York, USA
- Business Intelligence and Analytics, Visiting Nurse Service of New York, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jingjing Shang
- Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Vest TA, Gazda NP, Schenkat DH, Eckel SF. Practice-enhancing publications about the medication-use process in 2019. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2021; 78:141-153. [PMID: 33119100 DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/zxaa355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This article identifies, prioritizes, and summarizes published literature on the medication-use process (MUP) from calendar year 2019 that can impact health-system pharmacy daily practice. The MUP is the foundational system that provides the framework for safe medication utilization within the healthcare environment. The MUP is defined in this article as having the following components: prescribing/transcribing, dispensing, administration, and monitoring. Articles that evaluated one of the steps were gauged for their usefulness in promoting daily practice change. SUMMARY A PubMed search was conducted in January 2020 for calendar year 2019 using targeted Medical Subject Headings keywords; in addition, searches of the table of contents of selected pharmacy journals were conducted. A total of 4,317 articles were identified. A thorough review identified 66 potentially practice-enhancing articles: 17 for prescribing/transcribing, 17 for dispensing, 7 for administration, and 25 for monitoring. Ranking of the articles for importance by peers led to the selection of key articles from each category. The highest-ranked articles are briefly summarized, with a mention of why each article is important within health-system pharmacy. The other articles are listed for further review and evaluation. CONCLUSION It is important to routinely review the published literature and to incorporate significant findings into daily practice; this article assists in identifying and summarizing the most impactful recently published literature in this area. Health-system pharmacists have an active role in improving the MUP in their institution, and awareness of the significant published studies can assist in changing practice at the institutional level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler A Vest
- Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC.,University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | | - Stephen F Eckel
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC.,University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Barriers and Facilitators for Implementation of a Computerized Clinical Decision Support System in Lung Cancer Multidisciplinary Team Meetings-A Qualitative Assessment. BIOLOGY 2020; 10:biology10010009. [PMID: 33375573 PMCID: PMC7830066 DOI: 10.3390/biology10010009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Revised: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Simple Summary Oncological computerized clinical decision support systems (CCDSSs) are currently being developed to facilitate workflows of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs). To successfully implement these systems in MDTMs, the aim of this qualitative assessment was to identify barriers and facilitators for implementation and to provide actionable findings for an implementation strategy. The main facilitators for implementation of the CCDSS were considered to be easy access to well-structured data, and reducing time spent by clinicians on MDTM preparation and duration of the MDTMs. Main barriers for adoption were seen in incomplete or non-trustworthy output generated by the system and insufficient adaptability of the system to local and contextual needs. Actionable findings for an implementation strategy were a usability test and validation study involving key users in the organization’s real-life setting. Given the growing interest in CCDSSs in oncology care, insight in barriers and facilitators for successful implementation seems highly relevant. Abstract Background: Oncological computerized clinical decision support systems (CCDSSs) to facilitate workflows of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs) are currently being developed. To successfully implement these CCDSSs in MDTMs, this study aims to: (a) identify barriers and facilitators for implementation for the use case of lung cancer; and (b) provide actionable findings for an implementation strategy. Methods: The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Science was used to create an interview protocol and to analyze the results. Semi-structured interviews were conducted among various health care professionals involved in MDTMs. The transcripts were analyzed using a thematic analysis following a deductive approach. Results: Twenty-six professionals participated in the interviews. The main facilitators for implementation of the CCDSS were considered to be easy access to well-structured patient data, and the resulting reduction of MDTM preparation time and of duration of MDTMs. Main barriers for adoption were seen in incomplete or non-trustworthy output generated by the system and insufficient adaptability of the system to local and contextual needs. Conclusion: Using a CCDSS in lung cancer MDTMs was expected to increase efficiency of workflows. Successful implementation was seen as dependent on the reliability and adaptability of the CCDSS and involvement of key users in the implementation process.
Collapse
|
24
|
Trinkley KE, Kahn MG, Bennett TD, Glasgow RE, Haugen H, Kao DP, Kroehl ME, Lin CT, Malone DC, Matlock DD. Integrating the Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model With Best Practices in Clinical Decision Support Design: Implementation Science Approach. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e19676. [PMID: 33118943 PMCID: PMC7661234 DOI: 10.2196/19676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Revised: 07/18/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Clinical decision support (CDS) design best practices are intended to provide a narrative representation of factors that influence the success of CDS tools. However, they provide incomplete direction on evidence-based implementation principles. Objective This study aims to describe an integrated approach toward applying an existing implementation science (IS) framework with CDS design best practices to improve the effectiveness, sustainability, and reproducibility of CDS implementations. Methods We selected the Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) IS framework. We identified areas where PRISM and CDS design best practices complemented each other and defined methods to address each. Lessons learned from applying these methods were then used to further refine the integrated approach. Results Our integrated approach to applying PRISM with CDS design best practices consists of 5 key phases that iteratively interact and inform each other: multilevel stakeholder engagement, designing the CDS, design and usability testing, thoughtful deployment, and performance evaluation and maintenance. The approach is led by a dedicated implementation team that includes clinical informatics and analyst builder expertise. Conclusions Integrating PRISM with CDS design best practices extends user-centered design and accounts for the multilevel, interacting, and dynamic factors that influence CDS implementation in health care. Integrating PRISM with CDS design best practices synthesizes the many known contextual factors that can influence the success of CDS tools, thereby enhancing the reproducibility and sustainability of CDS implementations. Others can adapt this approach to their situation to maximize and sustain CDS implementation success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katy E Trinkley
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.,Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.,Clinical Informatics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.,Adult and Child Consortium for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Michael G Kahn
- Section of Informatics and Data Science, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Tellen D Bennett
- Adult and Child Consortium for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, Aurora, CO, United States.,Section of Informatics and Data Science, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Russell E Glasgow
- Adult and Child Consortium for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, Aurora, CO, United States.,Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Heather Haugen
- Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - David P Kao
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.,Clinical Informatics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Miranda E Kroehl
- Charter Communications Corporation, Greenwood Village, CO, United States
| | - Chen-Tan Lin
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.,Clinical Informatics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Daniel C Malone
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, Skaggs College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Daniel D Matlock
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.,Adult and Child Consortium for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, Aurora, CO, United States.,VA Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Aurora, CO, United States
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
The use of pharmacogenetic information is becoming mainstream with insurance companies and others starting to pay for widescale implementation of this new technology starting with patients who have anxiety and depression. It has been introduced in response to the unpredictability of medication, the high number of adverse drug events, and lack of drug effectiveness. Greater than one-third of patients are identified as having one or more pharmacogenetic variants. Each pharmacogenetic variant may affect the metabolism of several medications used in primary care, in addition to the antidepressant and anti-anxiolytic medications. Pharmacogenetic information is evolving with major international working groups providing continuous updates. It is challenging to incorporate this new information along with all the other variables needed to identify safe and effective drug options within a normal consultation. Medication decision support software is one solution that can help address this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Dawes
- Department of Family Practice, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Morris J, Jones M, Thompson N, Wallace T, DeRuyter F. Clinician Perspectives on mRehab Interventions and Technologies for People with Disabilities in the United States: A National Survey. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2019; 16:ijerph16214220. [PMID: 31683536 PMCID: PMC6862627 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16214220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2019] [Revised: 10/28/2019] [Accepted: 10/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Mobile health and mobile rehabilitation (mHealth and mRehab) services and technologies have attracted considerable interest from healthcare providers, technology vendors, rehabilitation engineers, investors and policy makers in recent years. Successful adoption and use of mHealth/mRehab requires clinician support and engagement, including the ability to identify appropriate use cases and possible barriers to use for themselves and their patients, and acquire adequate knowledge and confidence using mHealth/mRehab interventions. This article reports results from a survey of rehabilitation clinicians in the United States on their attitudes, experience, expectations and concerns regarding mHealth/mRehab interventions and technologies. Over 500 clinicians in physical, occupational, speech, recreation and psychological therapy professions, among others, participated in the survey. Respondents reported that an overwhelming majority of their patients need additional therapy after discharge from inpatient environments, and over half of outpatients need additional therapy between visits. A large majority reported prescribing specific exercises and interventions for patients to work on outside of the clinic. However, only 51% reported being comfortable integrating mRehab technology into their practice; and only 23% feel knowledgeable about rehabilitation technology currently available. Technologies to support mRehab are maturing rapidly. Clinicians recognize the need for mRehab, but their knowledge and confidence prescribing mRehab represents a significant barrier to adoption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mike Jones
- Shepherd Center, Atlanta, GA 30309, USA.
| | | | | | - Frank DeRuyter
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
| |
Collapse
|