Primary care follow-up and measured mental health outcomes among women referred for ultrasound assessment of pain and/or bleeding in early pregnancy: a quantitative questionnaire study

Psychological impact of simple scoring system for predicting early pregnancy outcome in pregnancy of uncertain viability: randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether psychological wellbeing of women with an intrauterine pregnancy of uncertain viability can be modified during the waiting period to final diagnosis, by offering predictive information regarding the likely outcome of the pregnancy (chance of ongoing viability).

METHODS

This was a single-center two-arm randomized controlled trial conducted over 18 months at a teaching hospital in London, UK. Consecutive eligible women attending the early pregnancy assessment unit with an interim ultrasound finding of intrauterine pregnancy of uncertain viability were recruited. All women were offered a follow-up ultrasound scan after 14 days. Participants were randomized to receive a prediction score for ongoing viability at 14 days or routine care (control). Anxiety, depression and worry symptoms were assessed using validated self-report questionnaires (hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS), Penn state worry questionnaire (PSWQ)) prior to randomization and at two further timepoints during the waiting period preceding final diagnosis. The change in psychological scores over the study period was analyzed. The secondary outcome was the perceived value of the risk prediction tool reported by participants.

RESULTS

A total of 278 women participated in this study. After adjusting for baseline scores, no difference in anxiety, depression or worry scores was demonstrated between control and intervention groups at either timepoint. Subgroup analysis, first of women with high initial anxiety (HADS > 11) or worry (PSWQ ≥ 45), and second of women with a more favorable predicted prognosis (≥ 75% chance of ongoing viability), demonstrated no difference between intervention and control groups. Despite this, 76/110 (69.1% (95% CI, 60.5-78.4%)) women who provided feedback in the intervention group found it to be helpful and 97/110 (88.2% (95% CI, 81.0-93.7%)) reported that they would use the tool again.

CONCLUSION

Current prediction tools may be useful for healthcare professionals to guide management and optimize utilization of early pregnancy resources. However, in this study, implementation of an accurate tool did not result in an objective measurable benefit to patients in terms of reduction in anxiety, depression and worry symptoms experienced during the waiting period to final outcome compared with women who did not receive a prediction score. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Patient attitudes and preferences for the management of pregnancy of unknown location

Objective

To understand patient attitudes and preferences when faced with the uncertainty of pregnancy of unknown location (PUL).

Design

Qualitative, interview-based study.

Setting

University Hosptial.

Patient(s)

Patients aged >18 years sampled from the emergency department and a subspecialty fertility practice of a university hospital system.

Intervention(s)

Six to 8 weeks after resolution of a PUL, with an ultimate clinical outcome of either an intrauterine pregnancy, spontaneous abortion, or ectopic pregnancy. Participants underwent either surgical, medical, or expectant management.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Thematic analysis of the virtual, semistructured interviews (45–60 minutes in length) conducted with participants to identify commonly expressed priorities was performed.

Result(s)

Interviews were completed from October 2020 to March 2021 until thematic saturation was achieved (n = 15). Resolution diagnoses included intrauterine pregnancy (26.7%, n = 4), ectopic pregnancy (40.0%, (n = 6), and spontaneous abortion (33.3%, n = 5). Moreover, 66.7% (n = 10) of the patients presented to the emergency department, whereas 33.3% (n = 5) presented to a subspecialty fertility clinic. All had desired pregnancies. Thematic analyses revealed 4 related priorities around PUL management: health of pregnancy; health of self; future fertility; and diagnostic prediction and diagnostic certainty. The relative balance of these priorities was dynamic and evolved throughout the course of management with different outcomes. A second set of themes related to logistical preferences included mental healthsupport, clarity of treatment and next steps, and continuity of care. Interrater reliability was validated with a pooled κ of >0.8. Limitations include that all participants had desired pregnancies, and the experiences of those who experienced different pregnancy outcomes may have been affected by recall bias.

Conclusion(s)

These data demonstrate novel themes around related priorities in patients with desired pregnancies diagnosed with a PUL previously underappreciated by clinicians. The balance of these priorities evolved throughout management with increasing information and clarity. Continually reevaluating relevant patient priorities and preferences is essential to the comprehensive management of PUL.

Anxiety associated with diagnostic uncertainty in early pregnancy

OBJECTIVES

To determine anxiety levels of women presenting to an early pregnancy assessment unit (EPAU) with abdominal pain and/or vaginal bleeding and to assess how these levels change over time and according to ultrasonographic diagnosis.

METHODS

We undertook a prospective cohort study in an EPAU in a large UK teaching hospital. Women with abdominal pain and/or vaginal bleeding in early pregnancy (< 12 weeks' gestation) presenting for the first time were eligible for inclusion in the study. State anxiety levels were assessed using the standardized short form of Spielberger's state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI) on three occasions (before, immediately after and 48-72 hours after an ultrasound scan). Scores were correlated with ultrasonographic diagnosis. The diagnosis was either certain or uncertain. Certain diagnoses were either positive, i.e. a viable intrauterine pregnancy (IUP), or negative, i.e. a non-viable IUP or ectopic pregnancy. Uncertain diagnoses included pregnancy of unknown location and pregnancy of uncertain viability. Statistical analysis involved mixed ANOVAs and the post-hoc Tukey-Kramer test.

RESULTS

A total of 160 women were included in the study. Anxiety levels decreased over time for women with a certain diagnosis (n = 128), even when negative (n = 64), and increased over time for women with an uncertain diagnosis (n = 32). Before the ultrasound examination, anxiety levels were high (STAI value, 21.96 ± 1.11) and there was no significant difference between the five groups. Immediately after the ultrasound examination, anxiety levels were lower in the viable IUP group (n = 64; 7.75 ± 1.13) than in any other group. The difference between the five groups was significant (P < 0.005). After 48-72 hours, women with a certain diagnosis had significantly lower anxiety levels than had those with an uncertain diagnosis (10.77 ± 4.30 vs 22.94 ± 1.65; P < 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

The experience of abdominal pain and/or vaginal bleeding in early pregnancy is highly anxiogenic. Following an ultrasound examination, the certainty of the diagnosis affects anxiety levels more than does the positive or negative connotations associated with the diagnosis per se. Healthcare providers should be aware of this when communicating uncertain diagnoses. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.