Salpingectomy as standard at hysterectomy? A Danish cohort study, 1977-2010

Ovarian cancer prevention by opportunistic salpingectomy is a new de facto standard in Germany

PURPOSE

The most prevalent and aggressive subtype of epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC), high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), originates in many cases from the fallopian tubes. Because of poor prognosis and lack of effective screening for early detection, opportunistic salpingectomy (OS) for prevention of EOC is being implemented into clinical routine in several countries worldwide. Taking the opportunity of a gynecological surgery in women at average cancer risk, extramural fallopian tubes are completely resected preserving the ovaries with their infundibulopelvic blood supply. Until recently, only 13 of the 130 national partner societies of the International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) have published a statement on OS. This study aimed to analyze the acceptance of OS in Germany.

METHODS

(1) Survey of German gynecologists in 2015 and 2022 by the Department of Gynecology of the Jena University Hospital in co-operation with the Department of Gynecology at Charité-University Medicine Berlin with support of NOGGO e. V. and AGO e. V. (2) Salpingectomy numbers in Germany for years 2005-2020 as retrieved from the Federal Statistical Office of Germany (Destatis).

RESULTS

(1) Survey: Number of participants was 203 in 2015 and 166 in 2022, respectively. Nearly all respondents (2015: 92%, 2022: 98%) have already performed bilateral salpingectomy without oophorectomy in combination with benign hysterectomy with the intention to reduce the risk for malignant (2015: 96%, 2022: 97%) and benign (2015: 47%, 2022: 38%) disorders. Compared to 2015 (56.6%), considerably more survey participants performed OS in > 50% or in all cases in 2022 (89.0%). Recommendation of OS for all women with completed family planning at benign pelvic surgery was approved by 68% in 2015 and 74% in 2022. (2) Case number analysis: In 2020, four times more cases of salpingectomy were reported by German public hospitals compared to 2005 (n = 50,398 vs. n = 12,286). Of all inpatient hysterectomies in German hospitals in 2020, 45% were combined with salpingectomy, and more than 65% in women at the age of 35 to 49 years.

CONCLUSION

Mounting scientific plausibility regarding involvement of fallopian tubes in the pathogenesis of EOC led to change of clinical acceptance of OS in many countries including in Germany. Case number data and widespread expert judgment demonstrate that OS has become a routine procedure in Germany and a de facto standard for primary prevention of EOC.

Survey: acceptability of opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy in Flanders

Background

The VVOG (Flemish Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology) published a consensus statement promoting opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy (OBS).

Objectives

The aim of the study was to obtain insight into the current opinion and general practice of Flemish gynaecologists to counsel and perform OBS.

Materials and Methods

A questionnaire was distributed to Flemish gynaecologists three months after publication of the consensus statement.

Main outcome measures

The drawbacks and incentives to counsel and perform OBS were questioned.

Results

Complete response rate was obtained from 99 gynaecologists (17%) and 37 trainees (19%). The majority of respondents (77%) always counselled for OBS in patients scheduled for hysterectomy without oophorectomy. Eighteen per cent counselled only above a certain age cut off and/or if patient was already menopausal. The most important incentive to counsel in cases of hysterectomy by the abdominal approach and vaginal hysterectomy (VH) was the opportunity to prevent ovarian cancer. The yet-undetermined risk of premature ovarian failure was mentioned as the most important barrier in counselling women for OBS in those undergoing hysterectomy by the abdominal approach. For VH, the respondents saw the risk of complications and increased surgical time as the most important barriers. Sixty-one percent of gynaecologists preferred to perform bilateral salpingectomy as sterilisation method.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that the concept of OBS is already well known in Flanders. There is a positive attitude towards the routine implementation of OBS, although some barriers and doubts about an age cut-off still exist in practice.

No. 344-Opportunistic Salpingectomy and Other Methods of Risk Reduction for Ovarian/Fallopian Tube/Peritoneal Cancer in the General Population

OBJECTIVE

This guideline reviews the potential benefits of opportunistic salpingectomy to prevent the development of high grade serous cancers (HGSC) of the ovary/fallopian tube/peritoneum based on current evidence supporting the fallopian tube origin of disease.

INTENDED USERS

Gynaecologists, obstetricians, family doctors, registered nurses, nurse practitioners, residents, and health care providers.

TARGET POPULATION

Adult women (18 and older): OPTIONS: Women considering hysterectomy who wish to retain their ovaries in situ have traditionally also retained their fallopian tubes. In addition, women undergoing permanent surgical sterilization have usually undergone tubal ligation using various methods rather than undergoing surgical removal of the entire fallopian tube.

EVIDENCE

For the sections "Evidence Supporting the Hypothesis That HGSC Originates in the Fallopian Tube" and "Current Literature on the Effects and Safety of Opportunistic Salpingectomy," relevant studies were searched in PubMed, Medline, and the Cochrane Systematic Reviews using the following terms, either alone or in combination, with the search limited to English language materials: "high grade serous cancers ovary," "fallopian tube," "peritoneum," "opportunistic salpingectomy," "epithelial ovarian cancers," "origin," "tubal carcinoma in situ," "BRCA mutation," "prophylactic salpingectomy," "inflammation," "clear cell," and "endometrioid." The initial search was performed in March 2015 with a final literature search in March 2016. Relevant evidence was selected for inclusion in the following order: meta-analyses, systematic reviews, guidelines, randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, observational studies, non-systematic reviews, case series, and reports. The total number of studies identified was 458, and 56 studies were included in this review. For the section "Other Factors Influencing the Risk of Developing "Ovarian" Cancers" a general Medline search was carried out using the terms "ovarian neoplasm" and "prevention." The search included papers published from December 2005 to March 2016. Meta-analyses were preferentially selected except where no such review was found. Additional searches for each subheading were also conducted (e.g., "ovarian neoplasm" and "tubal ligation.") Additional significant articles were identified through cross-referencing the identified reviews. For the search for "ovarian neoplasm" and "prevention," 10 meta-analyses were identified. For the search for "ovarian neoplasm" and "tubal ligation," an additional 4 meta-analyses were identified.

VALIDATION METHODS

The content and recommendations were drafted and agreed on by the principal authors. The Executive and Board of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology of Canada reviewed the content and submitted comments for consideration, and the Board of the SOGC approved the final draft for publication. The quality of evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology framework (Table 1). The interpretation of strong and weak recommendations is described in Table 2. The summary of findings is available on request.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND/OR COSTS

The addition of opportunistic salpingectomy to a planned hysterectomy or permanent sterilization did not increase rates of hospital readmission (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.10 and OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.21, respectively) or blood transfusions (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.10 and OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.73, respectively) but did increase the overall operating time (by 16 minutes and 10 minutes, respectively) in a retrospective review of 43 931 women. The risk of repeat surgery for tubal pathology among women with retained fallopian tubes after hysterectomy was at least doubled (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.88 to 2.42 in a population-based study of 170 000 women). If general gynaecologists were to consider removal of fallopian tubes at the time of every hysterectomy and sterilization procedure with referral of all patients with HGSC for hereditary cancer counselling and genetic testing, experts project a potential reduction in the rate of HGSC by 40% over the next 20 years.

GUIDELINE UPDATE

Evidence will be reviewed 5 years after publication to decide whether all or part of the guideline should be updated. However, if important new evidence is published prior to the 5-year cycle, the review process may be accelerated for a more rapid update of some recommendations.

SPONSORS

This guideline was developed with resources funded by the Society of Gynecologic Oncology of Canada and SOGC.

SUMMARY STATEMENTS

RECOMMENDATIONS.

The rationale of opportunistic bilateral salpingectomies (OBS) during benign gynaecological and obstetric surgery: a consensus text of the Flemish Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (VVOG)

Ovarian cancer (OC), is a disease difficult to diagnose in an early stage implicating a poor prognosis. The 5-year overall survival in Belgium has not changed in the last 18 years and remains 44 %. There is no effective screening method (secondary prevention) to detect ovarian cancer at an early stage. Primary prevention of ovarian cancer came in the picture through the paradigm shift that the fallopian tube is often the origin of ovarian cancer and not the ovary itself. Opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy (OBS) during benign gynaecological and obstetric surgery might have the potential to reduce the risk of ovarian cancer by as much as 65 %. Bilateral risk-reducing salpingectomy during a benign procedure is feasible, safe, appears to have no impact on the ovarian function and seems to be cost effective. The key question is whether we should wait for a RCT or implement OBS directly in our daily practice. Guidelines regarding OBS within our societies are therefore urgently needed. Our recommendation is to inform all women without a child wish, undergoing a benign gynaecological or obstetrical surgical procedure about the pro's and the con's of OBS and advise a bilateral salpingectomy. Furthermore, there is an urgent need for a prospective registry of OBS. The present article is the consensus text of the Flemish Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (VVOG) regarding OBS.

Ovarian cancer: Pathogenesis and current recommendations for prophylactic surgery

Ovarian cancer is one of the most common gynecologic cancers, and one of the leading causes of cancer-associated female mortality in the world. Currently, no widely accepted pathogenesis is available, which may explain the entire disease. Early detection and primary prevention of ovarian cancer are difficult, mostly due to its heterogeneous nature. Risk factor modification based on epidemiologic data has not significantly reduced the incidence of ovarian cancer. Currently, prophylactic surgical methods have been proposed as the most effective preventive measures for both the high-risk or low-risk populations. Understanding the existing pathogenesis theories and the surgical options available may alter physician’s perspectives and facilitate better decision making.

Bilateral salpingectomy to reduce the risk of ovarian/fallopian/peritoneal cancer in women at average risk: a position statement of the Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (KSOG)

Based on the current understanding of a preventive effect of bilateral salpingectomy on ovarian/fallopian/peritoneal cancers, the Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Endocrinology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine, and Korean Society for Reproductive Medicine support the following recommendations: • Women scheduled for hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease should be informed that bilateral salpingectomy reduces the risk of ovarian/fallopian/peritoneal cancer, and they should be counseled regarding this procedure at the time of hysterectomy. • Although salpingectomy is generally considered as a safe procedure in terms of preserving ovarian reserve, there is a lack of evidences representing its long-term outcomes. Therefore, patients should be informed about the minimal potential of this procedure for decreasing ovarian reserve. • Prophylactic salpingectomy during vaginal hysterectomy is favorable in terms of prevention of ovarian/fallopian/peritoneal cancer, although operation-related complications minimally increase with this procedure, compared to the complications associated with vaginal hysterectomy alone. Conversion to open or laparoscopic approach from vaginal approach to perform prophylactic salpingectomy is not recommended. • Women who desire permanent sterilization at the time of cesarean delivery could be counseled for prophylactic salpingectomy before surgery on an individual basis.

Thirteen Years of Experience with Opportunistic Bilateral Salpingectomy During TLH in Low-Risk Premenopausal Women

Background

Opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy (OBS), also called as prophylactic salpingectomy or risk-reducing salpingectomy is the concurrent removal of the fallopian tubes in premenopausal women. Though there are some studies comparing the intraoperative complications and effect of salpingectomy on ovarian reserve, limited data are available on long-term follow-up after OBS.

Purpose of the Study

To evaluate the surgical outcome of routine bilateral salpingectomy during total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) in terms of intraoperative and postoperative complications. We also evaluated the incidence and reoperation rate for adnexal pathology after TLH.

Methods

A retrospective study of 1470 patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) with opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy (OBS) over 13 years was carried out at Paul's Hospital.

Results

The mean age of the subjects was 43.6 ± 4.2 years, mean body mass index was 27 ± 5.4 kg/m², and median parity was 2 (range 0-7). 43% of women had at least one previous surgery. The most common indication for surgery was fibroid uterus (67%, n = 985). The total complication rate was 4.4% (n = 65). One specimen showed paratubal borderline serous malignancy. The follow-up period ranged from 6 months to 13 years during which 17 (1.1%) women had adnexal pathology, and eight women (1.1%) needed resurgery for it. No ovarian malignancies were reported on follow-up.

Conclusions

OBS is a simple and short surgical step during TLH without increasing morbidity. OBS eliminates the risk of future diseases of tubal origin, and there might be a possible reduction in incidence and reoperation rate for future ovarian pathologies.

N o 344-Salpingectomie opportuniste et autres méthodes pour réduire le risque de cancer de l'ovaire, de la trompe de Fallope et du péritoine dans la population générale

OBJECTIF

La présente directive clinique examine les avantages potentiels de la salpingectomie opportuniste pour prévenir le développement du cancer séreux de grade élevé de l'ovaire, de la trompe de Fallope et du péritoine à la lumière de données probantes actuelles selon lesquelles ce type de cancer prendrait naissance dans la trompe de Fallope.

UTILISATEURS CIBLES

Gynécologues, obstétriciens, médecins de famille, infirmières autorisées, infirmières praticiennes, résidents et fournisseurs de soins de santé.

POPULATION CIBLE

Femmes adultes (18 ans et plus) : OPTIONS: Les femmes envisageant une hystérectomie et souhaitant conserver leurs ovaires conservent généralement aussi leurs trompes de Fallope. De plus, celles qui subissent une chirurgie de stérilisation permanente subissent habituellement aussi une ligature des trompes selon des méthodes variées plutôt qu'un retrait chirurgical complet des trompes. RéSULTATS: Les sections « Données probantes appuyant l'hypothèse selon laquelle les CSGE prendraient naissance dans la trompe de Fallope » et « Articles récents sur les répercussions et la sûreté de la salpingectomie opportuniste » reposent sur des études pertinentes rédigées en anglais, qui ont été repérées dans PubMed, Medline et la Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews à l'aide des termes suivants, seuls ou combinés : high grade serous cancers ovary, fallopian tube, peritoneum, opportunistic salpingectomy, epithelial ovarian cancers, origin, tubal carcinoma in situ, BRCA mutation, prophylactic salpingectomy, inflammation, clear cell et endometrioid. La recherche initiale a été menée en mars 2015, et une dernière recherche a été effectuée en mars 2016. Dans l'ordre, les données probantes pertinentes ont été tirées de méta-analyses, de revues de la littérature, de directives, d'essais cliniques randomisés, d'études de cohorte prospectives, d'études d'observation, de revues non systématiques, d'études de série de cas ainsi que de rapports. Au total, 458 études ont été repérées, et 56 ont été retenues pour la présente directive. Pour la section « Autres facteurs influant sur le risque de développer un cancer de ″l'ovaire″ », une recherche générale a été effectuée dans Medline à partir des termes ovarian neoplasm et prevention. Ont été inclus dans cette recherche des articles rédigés entre décembre 2005 et mars 2016. Les méta-analyses ont été privilégiées lorsque possible. Des recherches supplémentaires ont également été menées pour chaque sous-descripteurs (p. ex., ovarian neoplasm et tubal ligation). D'autres articles pertinents ont été ciblés au moyen d'une vérification des références des revues de la littérature retenues. Les termes ovarian neoplasm et prevention ont permis de repérer 10 méta-analyses; les termes ovarian neoplasm et tubal ligation, 4 méta-analyses. MéTHODES DE VALIDATION: Le contenu et les recommandations ont été rédigés et acceptés par les auteurs principaux. La direction et le conseil de la Société de gynéco-oncologie du Canada ont examiné le contenu et soumis des commentaires, puis le Conseil d'administration de la SOGC a approuvé la version finale avant publication. La qualité des données probantes a été évaluée à partir des critères de l'approche GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) (tableau 1). L'interprétation des recommandations solides et conditionnelles est décrite dans le tableau 2. Le résumé des conclusions peut être fourni sur demande. AVANTAGES, INCONVéNIENTS ET COûTS: L'ajout d'une salpingectomie opportuniste à une hystérectomie ou à une procédure de stérilisation permanente prévue n'a pas entraîné une augmentation des taux de réadmission à l'hôpital (RC : 0,91; IC à 95 % : 0,75-1, 10 et RC : 0,8; IC à 95 % : 0,56-1,21, respectivement) ou de transfusion sanguine (RC : 0,86; IC à 95 % : 0,67-1,10 et RC : 0,75; IC à 95 % : 0,32-1,73, respectivement), mais il a entraîné une hausse de la durée des opérations (de 16 minutes et de 10 minutes, respectivement) selon une étude rétrospective portant sur 43 931 femmes. Le risque de subir des interventions répétées pour une pathologie tubaire chez les femmes ayant conservé leurs trompes de Fallope après une hystérectomie était au moins deux fois plus élevé (RC : 2,13; IC à 95 % : 1,88-2,42, selon une étude fondée sur une population de 170 000 femmes). Selon des experts, si les gynécologues généralistes envisageaient systématiquement de retirer les trompes de Fallope lors d'une hystérectomie ou d'une procédure de stérilisation et d'aiguiller toutes les patientes aux prises avec un CSGE vers une consultation en oncologie génétique et un dépistage génétique, le taux de CSGE pourrait diminuer de 40 % au cours des 20 prochaines années. MISE à JOUR DE DIRECTIVES CLINIQUES: Une revue des données probantes sera menée cinq ans après la publication de la présente directive clinique afin de déterminer si une mise à jour complète ou partielle s'impose. Cependant, si de nouvelles données probantes importantes sont publiées avant la fin du cycle de cinq ans, le processus pourrait être accéléré afin que certaines recommandations soient mises à jour rapidement.

PARRAINS

La présente directive clinique a été élaborée à l'aide de ressources financées par la Société de gynéco-oncologie du Canada et la SOGC. DéCLARATIONS SOMMAIRES: RECOMMANDATIONS.

Incidental (Prophylactic) Salpingectomy at Benign Gynecologic Surgery and Cesarean Section: a Survey of Practice in Austria

Introduction: Most serous ovarian cancers are now thought to originate in the fallopian tubes. This has raised the issue of performing incidental salpingectomy (also called elective, opportunistic, prophylactic or risk-reducing salpingectomy) at the time of benign gynecologic surgery or cesarean section. We conducted an online survey to ascertain the policies regarding incidental salpingectomy in Austria in late 2014. Material and Methods: All 75 departments of obstetrics and gynecology in public hospitals in Austria were surveyed for their policies regarding incidental salpingectomy at benign gynecologic surgery or cesarean section. Results: Sixty-six of 75 surveyed departments completed the questionnaire, resulting in a response rate of 88 %. Overall, 46 of 66 (70 %) units reported offering or recommending incidental salpingectomy at benign gynecologic surgery, 12 units (18 %) did not, and eight units (12 %) did not have a consistent policy. Salpingectomy was the preferred method for surgical sterilization, including sterilization at the time of cesarean section (71 % and 64 % of units, respectively). Conclusions: Incidental (elective, opportunistic, prophylactic, risk-reducing) salpingectomy is now widely offered at benign gynecologic surgery and cesarean section in Austria. Evidence for the role of the fallopian tubes in the origin of serous pelvic cancer has led to changes in clinical practice.

Adnexal masses requiring reoperation in women with previous hysterectomy with or without adnexectomy

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the etiologies of adnexal masses requiring reoperation in women with prior hysterectomy and to compare incidence and pathology of these masses based upon whether total, partial or no adnexectomy was performed at time of hysterectomy. In addition, the average time interval between hysterectomy and reoperation for a pelvic mass is ascertained.

STUDY DESIGN

A single-institution, retrospective review spanning 10 years. Using pertinent ICD-9 and CPT codes, women with a history of hysterectomy who underwent a subsequent surgery for an adnexal or pelvic mass were identified.

RESULTS

Over ten years, 250 women returned for gynecologic surgery due to a pelvic mass after prior hysterectomy. Most had undergone hysterectomy only (76%). 64.8% of these women had masses of ovarian origin, 12.4% were tubal in origin, 20% of masses involved both the ovary and tube and a small proportion arose from non-gynecologic processes. 18% of these women had a malignancy; 80% were ovarian and 6.7% originated from the fallopian tube. Patients having had a prior hysterectomy and bilateral salpingectomy returned soonest (p<0.0001) and patients with malignant masses returned after the longest time intervals (HR 0.41, p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of adnexal masses requiring reoperation after hysterectomy are gynecologic in origin, benign, and arise from the ovary. Women returning with malignant masses after hysterectomy present after longer time intervals.

Bilateral salpingectomy can reduce the risk of ovarian cancer in the general population: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The results of recent studies have suggested that high-grade serous ovarian cancer predominantly arises within the fallopian tubes. The reduction of ovarian cancer (OC) risk in women with a history of bilateral salpingectomy (BS) has been reported. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the impact of BS in preventing OC in the general population.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases and CENTRAL in the Cochrane Library for all English-language articles published up to January 2015, using the key words 'ovarian cancer' and 'bilateral salpingectomy.' Odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated by standard meta-analysis techniques.

RESULTS

Of the 77 studies retrieved, three were included in this meta-analysis, including one cohort study and two population-based case-control studies with 3509 patients who underwent BS and 5,655,702 controls who did not undergo salpingectomy. Over the combined study period, 29 of the 3509 BS patients developed OC compared with 44,006 of the 5,655,702 without salpingectomy. The meta-analysis results based on the fixed effects model revealed a significant decrease in the risk of OC occurrence in the patients who underwent BS relative to the controls (OR=0.51, 95% CI 0.35-0.75, I(2)=0%). This pattern was also observed in subgroup analysis for the study type.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that removal of the fallopian tubes is an effective measure to reduce OC risk in the general population. Therefore, prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy should be considered for women who require hysterectomy with benign indications or sterilisation procedures.

Opportunistic salpingectomies for the prevention of a high-grade serous carcinoma: a statement by the Kommission Ovar of the AGO

The detection of premalignant cells in the epithelium of the fallopian tube has resulted in revolutionary theories regarding the origin of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Serous tubal intra-epithelial carcinomas (STIC) have been detected in patients with BRCA 1 or 2 mutations and are considered as the most likely precursors of the high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), which is the most common histological subtype in patients with EOC. A bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is associated with a significant reduction in risk of developing EOC. According to various national guidelines, prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy should be performed in the age group 40-45 years. As in patients with BRCA mutations, the prophylactic removal of the fallopian tubes is also performed in women without an increased genetic risk, for example, in surgical treatments of benign conditions. There is a current debate as to whether prophylactic or so-called opportunistic salpingectomy will influence the overall incidence of EOC in the coming years. Opponents of this theory warn of a higher surgical morbidity and the higher risk of a premature menopause through impaired vascular supply to the ovaries. The value of opportunistic salpingectomies has not yet been clarified since there are currently no systematic risk-benefit evaluations. This review will attempt to give an overview of the current body of evidence regarding the risks and benefits of opportunistic salpingectomies.