1
|
Johnson EA, Johnson MT, Kypridemos C, Villadsen A, Pickett KE. Designing a generic, adaptive protocol resource for the measurement of health impact in cash transfer pilot and feasibility studies and trials in high-income countries. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2023; 9:51. [PMID: 36959682 PMCID: PMC10034903 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-023-01276-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, upstream interventions that tackle social determinants of health inequalities have never been more important. Evaluations of upstream cash transfer trials have failed to capture comprehensively the impacts that such systems might have on population health through inadequate design of the interventions themselves and failure to implement consistent, thorough research measures that can be used in microsimulations to model long-term impact. In this article, we describe the process of developing a generic, adaptive protocol resource to address this issue and the challenges involved in that process. The resource is designed for use in high-income countries (HIC) but draws on examples from a UK context to illustrate means of development and deployment. The resource is capable of further adaptation for use in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). It has particular application for trials of Universal Basic Income but can be adapted to those covering other kinds of cash transfer and welfare system changes. METHODS We outline two types of prospective intervention based on pilots and trials currently under discussion. In developing the remainder of the resource, we establish six key principles, implement a modular approach based on types of measure and their prospective resource intensity, and source (validated where possible) measures and baseline data primarily from routine collection and large, longitudinal cohort studies. Through these measures, we seek to cover all areas of health impact identified in our theoretical model for use in pilot and feasibility studies. RESULTS We find that, in general, self-reported measures alongside routinely collected linked respondent data may provide a feasible means of producing data capable of demonstrating comprehensive health impact. However, we also suggest that, where possible, physiological measures should be included to elucidate underlying biological effects that may not be accurately captured through self-reporting alone and can enable modelling of long-term health outcomes. In addition, accurate self-reported objective income data remains a challenge and requires further development and testing. A process of development and implementation of the resource in pilot and feasibility studies will support assessment of whether or not our proposed health outcome measures are acceptable, feasible and can be used with validity and reliability in the target population. DISCUSSION We suggest that while Open Access evaluation instruments are available and usable to measure most constructs of interest, there remain some areas for which further development is necessary. This includes self-reported wellbeing measures that require paid licences but are used in a range of nationally important longitudinal studies instead of Open Access alternatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Matthew Thomas Johnson
- Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Kate E. Pickett
- Epidemiology in the Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
- Centre for Future Health, University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Atkins N, Mukhida K. The relationship between patients’ income and education and their access to pharmacological chronic pain management: A scoping review. Can J Pain 2022; 6:142-170. [PMID: 36092247 PMCID: PMC9450907 DOI: 10.1080/24740527.2022.2104699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Atkins
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Management and Perioperative Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Karim Mukhida
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Management and Perioperative Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yu D, Jordan KP, Wilkie R, Bailey J, Fitzpatrick J, Ali N, Niblett P, Peat G. Persistent inequalities in consultation incidence and prevalence of low back pain and osteoarthritis in England between 2004 and 2019. Rheumatol Adv Pract 2022; 7:rkac106. [PMID: 36601519 PMCID: PMC9800855 DOI: 10.1093/rap/rkac106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective We wanted to determine whether socioeconomic inequalities in primary care consultation rates for two major, disabling musculoskeletal conditions in England narrowed or widened between 2004 and 2019. Methods We analysed data from Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum, a national general practice electronic health records database, linked to national deprivation ranking of each patient's registered residential postcode. For each year, we estimated the age- and sex-standardized consultation incidence and prevalence for low back pain and OA for the most deprived 10% of neighbourhoods through to the least deprived 10%. We then calculated the slope index of inequality and relative index of inequality overall and by sex, age group and geographical region. Results Inequalities in low back pain incidence and prevalence over socioeconomic status widened between 2004 and 2013 and stabilized between 2014 and 2019. Inequalities in OA incidence remained stable over socioeconomic status within the study period, whereas inequalities in OA prevalence widened markedly over socioeconomic status between 2004 and 2019. The widest gap in low back pain incidence and prevalence over socioeconomic status was observed in populations resident in northern English regions and London and in those of working age, peaking at 45-54 years. Conclusion We found persistent, and generally increasing, socioeconomic inequalities in the rate of adults presenting to primary care in England with low back pain and OA between 2004 and 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dahai Yu
- Correspondence: Dahai Yu, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, David Weatherall Building, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK. E-mail:
| | - Kelvin P Jordan
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Ross Wilkie
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - James Bailey
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Justine Fitzpatrick
- Department of Health and Social Care, Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, London, UK
| | - Nuzhat Ali
- Department of Health and Social Care, Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, London, UK
| | - Paul Niblett
- Department of Health and Social Care, Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, London, UK
| | - George Peat
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK,Department of Allied Health Professions, College of Health, Wellbeing & Life Sciences, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Peat G, Jordan KP, Wilkie R, Corp N, van der Windt DA, Yu D, Narle G, Ali N. Do recommended interventions widen or narrow inequalities in musculoskeletal health? An equity-focussed systematic review of differential effectiveness. J Public Health (Oxf) 2022; 44:e376-e387. [PMID: 35257184 PMCID: PMC9424108 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdac014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Revised: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background It is unclear whether seven interventions recommended by Public Health England for preventing and managing common musculoskeletal conditions reduce or widen health inequalities in adults with musculoskeletal conditions. Methods We used citation searches of Web of Science (date of ‘parent publication’ for each intervention to April 2021) to identify original research articles reporting subgroup or moderator analyses of intervention effects by social stratifiers defined using the PROGRESS-Plus frameworks. Randomized controlled trials, controlled before-after studies, interrupted time series, systematic reviews presenting subgroup/stratified analyses or meta-regressions, individual participant data meta-analyses and modelling studies were eligible. Two reviewers independently assessed the credibility of effect moderation claims using Instrument to assess the Credibility of Effect Moderation Analyses. A narrative approach to synthesis was used (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019140018). Results Of 1480 potentially relevant studies, seven eligible analyses of single trials and five meta-analyses were included. Among these, we found eight claims of potential differential effectiveness according to social characteristics, but none that were judged to have high credibility. Conclusions In the absence of highly credible evidence of differential effectiveness in different social groups, and given ongoing national implementation, equity concerns may be best served by investing in monitoring and action aimed at ensuring fair access to these interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Peat
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - K P Jordan
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - R Wilkie
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - N Corp
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - D A van der Windt
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - D Yu
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - G Narle
- Public Health England, London, SE1 8UG, UK.,Versus Arthritis, Chesterfield, S41 7TD, UK
| | - N Ali
- Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, Department of Health and Social Care, London, SW1H 0EU, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Houlding-Braunberger E, Petkovic J, Lebel N, Tugwell P. Experts prioritize osteoarthritis non-surgical interventions from Cochrane systematic reviews for translation into "Evidence4Equity" summaries. Int J Equity Health 2021; 20:136. [PMID: 34112156 PMCID: PMC8193871 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-021-01477-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Osteoarthritis generates substantial health and socioeconomic burden, which is particularly marked in marginalized groups. It is imperative that practitioners have ready access to summaries of evidence-based interventions for osteoarthritis that incorporate equity considerations. Summaries of systematic reviews can provide this. The present study surveyed experts to prioritize a selection ofinterventions, from which equity focused summaries will be generated. Specifically, the prioritized interventions will be developed into Cochrane Evidence4Equity (E4E) summaries. METHODS Twenty-seven systematic reviews of OA interventions were found. From these, twenty-nine non-surgical treatments for osteoarthritis were identified, based on statistically significant findings for desired outcome variables or adverse events. Key findings from these studies were summarised and provided to 9 experts in the field of osteoarthritis.. Expert participants were asked to rate interventions based on feasibility, health system effects, universality, impact on inequities, and priority for translation into equity based E4E summaries. Expert participants were also encouraged to make comments to provide context for each rating. Free text responses were coded inductively and grouped into subthemes and themes. RESULTS Expert participants rated the intervention home land-based exercise for knee OA highest for priority for translation into an E4E summaries, followed by the interventions individual land-based exercise for knee OA, class land-based exercise for knee OA, exercise for hand OA and land-based exercise for hip OA. Upon qualitative analysis of the expert participants' comments, fifteen subthemes were identified and grouped into three overall themes: (1) this intervention or an aspect of this intervention is unnecessary or unsafe; (2) this intervention or an aspect of this intervention may increase health inequities; and (3) experts noted difficulties completing rating exercise. CONCLUSION The list of priority interventions and corresponding expert commentary generated information that will be used to direct and support knowledge translation efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Houlding-Braunberger
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- Faculty of Science, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jennifer Petkovic
- Bruyère Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
- WHO Collaborating Centre for knowledge Translation and Health Technology Assessment in Health Equity, Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Nicholas Lebel
- Faculty of Science, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Peter Tugwell
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
- WHO Collaborating Centre for knowledge Translation and Health Technology Assessment in Health Equity, Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yau A, Adams J, Boyland EJ, Burgoine T, Cornelsen L, de Vocht F, Egan M, Er V, Lake AA, Lock K, Mytton O, Petticrew M, Thompson C, White M, Cummins S. Sociodemographic differences in self-reported exposure to high fat, salt and sugar food and drink advertising: a cross-sectional analysis of 2019 UK panel data. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e048139. [PMID: 33827849 PMCID: PMC8031692 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore sociodemographic differences in exposure to advertising for foods and drinks high in fat, salt and sugar (HFSS) and whether exposure is associated with body mass index (BMI). DESIGN Cross-sectional survey. SETTING UK. PARTICIPANTS 1552 adults recruited to the Kantar Fast Moving Consumer Goods panel for London and the North of England. OUTCOME MEASURES Self-reported advertising exposure stratified by product/service advertised (processed HFSS foods; sugary drinks; sugary cereals; sweet snacks; fast food or digital food delivery services) and advertising setting (traditional; digital; recreational; functional or transport); BMI and sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS Overall, 84.7% of participants reported exposure to HFSS advertising in the past 7 days. Participants in the middle (vs high) socioeconomic group had higher odds of overall self-reported exposure (OR 1.48; 95% CI 1.06 to 2.07). Participants in the low (vs high) socioeconomic group had higher odds of reporting exposure to advertising for three of five product categories (ORs ranging from 1.41 to 1.67), advertising for digital food delivery services (OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.05 to 2.05), traditional advertising (OR 1.44; 95% CI 1.00 to 2.08) and digital advertising (OR 1.50; 95% CI 1.06 to 2.14). Younger adults (18-34 years vs ≥65 years) had higher odds of reporting exposure to advertising for digital food delivery services (OR 2.08; 95% CI 1.20 to 3.59), digital advertising (OR 3.93; 95% CI 2.18 to 7.08) and advertising across transport networks (OR 1.96; 95% CI 1.11 to 3.48). Exposure to advertising for digital food delivery services (OR 1.40; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.88), digital advertising (OR 1.80; 95% CI 1.33 to 2.44) and advertising in recreational environments (OR 1.46; 95% CI 1.02 to 2.09) was associated with increased odds of obesity. CONCLUSIONS Exposure to less healthy product advertising was prevalent, with adults in lower socioeconomic groups and younger adults more likely to report exposure. Broader restrictions may be needed to reduce sociodemographic differences in exposure to less healthy product advertising.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Yau
- Population Health Innovation Lab, Department of Public Health, Environments & Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Department of Health Services Research & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Jean Adams
- Centre for Diet & Activity Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Emma J Boyland
- Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Thomas Burgoine
- Centre for Diet & Activity Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Laura Cornelsen
- Population Health Innovation Lab, Department of Public Health, Environments & Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Frank de Vocht
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West, Bristol, UK
| | - Matt Egan
- Department of Public Health, Environments & Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Vanessa Er
- Population Health Innovation Lab, Department of Public Health, Environments & Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Amelia A Lake
- Centre for Public Health Research, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
- Centre for Translational Research in Public Health (Fuse), Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Karen Lock
- Department of Health Services Research & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Oliver Mytton
- Centre for Diet & Activity Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mark Petticrew
- Department of Public Health, Environments & Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Claire Thompson
- Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Martin White
- Centre for Diet & Activity Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Steven Cummins
- Population Health Innovation Lab, Department of Public Health, Environments & Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ryu SY, Kim J, Hong JH, Chung EJ. Incidence and characteristics of cataract surgery in South Korea from 2011 to 2015: A nationwide population-based study. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2019; 48:319-327. [PMID: 31867796 DOI: 10.1111/ceo.13705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2019] [Revised: 12/12/2019] [Accepted: 12/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Detailed incidence data for cataract surgery in the general population are limited, yet important for determining the surgical needs of the community and formulation of healthcare policies. BACKGROUND To report incidence rates of cataract surgery in South Korea. DESIGN Nationwide, retrospective population-based study. PARTICIPANTS This study involved the entire population of South Korea (n = 47 990 761); 2 236 107 eyes of 1 591 176 patients confirmed as having cataract surgery from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2015 were included. METHODS Data for all patients who underwent primary cataract surgery in South Korea were retrieved using Korean Electronic Data Interchange and Korean Standard Classification of Diseases-7 codes. Annual incidence rates were calculated and adjusted to the national population data for the corresponding year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The average incidence of cataract surgery during the 5-year study period was estimated using population data from the 2010 Korean census. RESULTS The incidence of cataract surgery increased from 8.54/1000 person-years in 2011 to 9.67/1000 person-years in 2015. The probability of second-eye surgery within 12 months after the first-eye surgery increased from 42.98% in 2011 to 48.01% in 2015. In total, 85.72% of surgeries were performed in non-rural areas: 43.18% in individuals with a higher household income and 76.65% in primary healthcare centres. The rate of vitrectomy for posterior capsular rupture was 0.72%. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The incidence of cataract surgery in South Korea is increasing over time. Our findings are expected to aid in the formulation of future healthcare policies concerning cataract surgery in South Korea.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sun Young Ryu
- Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.,Department of Ophthalmology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, South Korea
| | - Jiwon Kim
- Department of Ophthalmology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, South Korea
| | - Jung Hwa Hong
- Department of Research and Analysis, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, South Korea
| | - Eun Jee Chung
- Department of Ophthalmology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Asthana S, Moon G, Gibson A, Bailey T, Hewson P, Dibben C. Inequity in cardiovascular care in the English National Health Service (NHS): a scoping review of the literature. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2018; 26:259-272. [PMID: 27747961 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/11/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
There is a general understanding that socioeconomically disadvantaged people are also disadvantaged with respect to their access to NHS care. Insofar as considerable NHS funding has been targeted at deprived areas, it is important to better understand whether and why socioeconomic variations in access and utilisation exist. Exploring this question with reference to cardiovascular care, our aims were to synthesise and evaluate evidence relating to access to and/or use of English NHS services around (i) different points on the care pathway (i.e. presentation, primary management and specialist management) and (ii) different dimensions of inequality (socioeconomic, age- and gender-related, ethnic or geographical). Restricting our search period from 2004 to 2016, we were concerned to examine whether, compared to earlier research, there has been a change in the focus of research examining inequalities in cardiac care and whether the pro-rich bias reported in the late 1990s and early 2000s still applies today. We conducted a scoping study drawing on Arksey & O'Malley's framework. A total of 174 studies were included in the review and appraised for methodological quality. Although, in the past decade, there has been a shift in research focus away from gender and age inequalities in access/use and towards socioeconomic status and ethnicity, evidence that deprived people are less likely to access and use cardiovascular care is very contradictory. Patterns of use appear to vary by ethnicity; South Asian populations enjoying higher access, black populations lower. By contrast, female gender and older age are consistently associated with inequity in cardiovascular care. The degree of geographical variation in access/use is also striking. Finally, evidence of inequality increases with stage on the care pathway, which may indicate that barriers to access arise from the way in which health professionals are adjudicating health needs rather than a failure to seek help in the first place.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheena Asthana
- School of Government, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Graham Moon
- School of Geography and the Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Alex Gibson
- School of Government, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Trevor Bailey
- Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Paul Hewson
- School of Computing and Mathematics, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Chris Dibben
- School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|