Health literacy and 30-day hospital readmission after acute myocardial infarction

Association of Limited Health Literacy With Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Individuals With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

Health literacy is an important social determinant of health, with limited health literacy associated with worse health outcomes. This study examined the associations between limited health literacy with patient-reported outcomes and disease activity/damage among 267 Black women with active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) enrolled in the Peer Approaches to Lupus Self-Management (PALS) program.

METHODS

The three-item Chew Health Literacy Screening was used to dichotomize those reporting in the "limited" range on any item with outcomes compared via generalized linear models. Baseline surveys and assessments obtained at study entry as part of the PALS study were used. Primary outcomes included disease activity and lupus damage; other secondary outcomes included patient activation, self-efficacy, physician/patient communication, and quality of life.

RESULTS

The study included 267 Black women with SLE. In covariate-adjusted analyses, participants with limited health literacy (88 [33%]) were more likely to have lower patient activation (Patient Activation Measure P < 0.0001), lower self-efficacy (Lupus Self-Efficacy P < 0.0001), higher lupus damage (self-administered Brief Index of Lupus Damage P = .016), higher disease activity (Systemic Lupus Activity Questionnaire symptom severity P = 0.006), and worse physician/patient communication (patient-centered care P < 0.0001) compared to those with adequate health literacy. Those with limited health literacy also reported worse lupus quality of life (P = 0.0004) and greater levels of stress (Perceived Stress Scale-4 P < 0.0001) and were 2.4 times more likely to have probable major depression (Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale-8 of ≥10 P = 0.004) and probable anxiety disorder (General Anxiety Disorder-7 of ≥10 P = 0.007) compared to those with adequate health literacy.

CONCLUSION

Black women with SLE and limited health literacy have worse clinical outcomes and represent a particularly vulnerable population with significantly disparate health outcomes. These findings suggest health literacy and complexities of managing SLE may impair clinical care in multiple domains, ultimately contributing to higher disease activity and death/damage, and are important to address in clinical care and future interventions in patients with SLE.

Identifying Health Literacy Strengths and Needs Among Jordanian Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients

Acute myocardial infarction is a significant health issue, particularly in Jordan where ischemic heart disease is the leading cause of death. Effective management of acute myocardial infarction is essential to mitigate its consequences. Although health literacy is crucial for the successful management of acute myocardial infarction, research about the strengths and needs of health literacy among acute myocardial infarction patients is still limited. This study was conducted to identify the health literacy strengths and needs of Jordanian acute myocardial infarction patients using cluster analysis. A cross-sectional design was used to conduct this study in a sample of acute myocardial infarction patients in Jordan (N = 114). A demographics questionnaire and the Health Literacy Questionnaire were used to collect the data. Data analysis was performed using hierarchical cluster analysis using Ward's method. Seven distinct clusters of acute myocardial infarction patients were identified, each characterized by unique health literacy profiles and sociodemographic characteristics. Cluster 7 had the highest health literacy scores across all nine Health Literacy Questionnaire scales. Sociodemographic factors such as age, education level, and gender influenced health literacy levels, with female, younger, more educated patients exhibiting higher health literacy. Through identifying the specific strengths and needs, this research provides a foundation for developing targeted health literacy interventions for acute myocardial infarction patients. Improving health literacy among acute myocardial infarction patients can enhance their ability to manage their health and potentially reduce the complications associated with acute myocardial infarction.

Physicians Are Unable to Consistently Predict Patient Health Literacy in a Breast Clinic

INTRODUCTION

Health literacy (HL) is a patient's capacity to understand health information. Low HL is associated with worse cancer outcomes and adherence to treatment regimens. This study aimed to test physicians' ability to predict their patients' HL after an initial consultation to determine if routine HL screening is valuable.

METHODS

From February 2023 through June 2023, patients seen at an academic breast clinic completed a validated, self-reported HL assessment. Surgical and medical oncologists estimated their patients' HL by answering the same HL questionnaire based on their perception of the patient visit. Patient and physician scores were compared using an intraclass correlation coefficient. Linear regression was used to evaluate associations between physicians' ability to predict HL and other variables.

RESULTS

The cohort included 210 patient HL scores with corresponding physician scores for each. Most patients (75.7%) had adequate HL. There was moderate agreement between the patient and physician HL scores (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.677, P < 0.01), meaning physicians could somewhat predict their patient's HL. Physicians were worse at predicting HL when patients had low HL. There was no difference in physicians' ability to predict HL based on patient age (P = 0.09) or race (P = 0.29). Additionally, we found no difference in the ability to predict HL based on the physician's specialty (P = 0.25).

CONCLUSIONS

After an initial consultation, physicians cannot accurately predict patient HL, particularly in patients with lower HL. Given the impact of low HL on a patient's ability to make treatment decisions and adhere to treatment plans, using a validated tool to measure HL is necessary.

Developing indicators for medication-related readmissions based on a Delphi consensus study

BACKGROUND

Medication-related readmissions challenge healthcare systems by burdening patients, increasing costs and straining resources. However, to date, there has been no consensus study on indicators for medication-related readmissions.

OBJECTIVES

This Delphi study aimed to develop a consensus-based set of indicators for detecting patients at risk of medication-related readmission.

METHODS

An expert panel of clinical pharmacists, physicians and nursing experts participated in a two-round Delphi study. In round 1, 31 indicators taken from the literature were rated for relevance on a scale from 1 to 9, with a median rating of 7 or higher suggesting relevance. The RAND/UCLA method was used to determine consensus. In round 2, indicators lacking consensus were re-rated together with a series of new indicators generated by the experts. Additional details were sought for some indicators. The main outcomes were the relevance of, consensus on, and completeness of the proposed indicators for identifying risks of 30-day medication-related readmission.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight experts participated in round 1. Consensus was found for all the indicators, with 25 included and 6 excluded. Thirty-four experts participated in round 2. Consensus was found for all 5 newly suggested indicators, and 4 were included. The expert panel prioritized the following indicators: (1) insufficient communication between different healthcare providers, (2) polypharmacy (≥7 medications), (3) low rates of medication adherence (twice-weekly mistakes or missing administration), (4) complex medication regimens (≥3 doses, ≥2 dosage forms and ≥2 administration routes per day), and (5) multimorbidity (≥3 chronic conditions). The final set comprised 29 indicators.

CONCLUSIONS

The indicator set developed for flagging potential medication-related readmissions could guide priorities for clinical pharmacy services at hospital discharge, improving patient outcomes and resource use. A validation study of these indicators is planned.

High risk of rehospitalization within 1 year following a pulmonary embolism-insights from the Danish nationwide registries from 2000-2020

AIM

To identify the absolute risk, causes, and factors associated with rehospitalization within 1 year of discharge with a pulmonary embolism (PE).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using the Danish nationwide registries, all patients admitted with a first-time PE between 2000 and 2020 and discharged alive were included. Subsequent hospitalizations were categorized and crude cumulative incidences were used to estimate the absolute risk (AR) of any rehospitalization and specific causes of rehospitalizations. Risk factors for rehospitalization were investigated using cause specific Cox regression models.A total of 55 201 patients were identified. The median age of the study population was 70 years (inter quartile range: 59;79), and the most prevalent comorbidities were cancer (29.3%) and ischemic heart disease (12.7%). The 1-year AR of any rehospitalization after discharge with a PE was 48.6% (95% confidence interval (CI); 48.2%-48.8%). The most common cause for being rehospitalized was due to respiratory disease [1-year AR: 9.5% (95% CI: 9.3%-9.8%)], followed by cardiovascular disease [1-year AR: 6.3% (95% CI: 5.9%-6.5%)], cancer [1-year AR: 6.0% (95% CI: 5.8%-6.4%)], venous thromboembolism [1-year AR: 5.2% (95% CI: 5.0%-5.2%)], and symptom diagnoses [1-year AR: 5.2% (95% CI: 5.0%-5.4%)]. Factors that were associated with an increased risk of rehospitalization were cancer, liver disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, and immobilization.

CONCLUSION

Patients with PE have a high risk of rehospitalization, with almost half of patients being rehospitalized within 1 year. Identification of high-risk patients may help target interventions aiming at reducing the risk of rehospitalization.

Readability of Spanish-Language Online Patient Educational Materials for Peripheral Artery Disease Do Not Meet Recommended Standards and Represent a Literacy Barrier to Care

BACKGROUND

Online resources are a valuable source of information for patients and have been reported to improve engagement and adherence to medical care. However, readability of online patient educational materials (OPEMs) is crucial for them to serve their intended purpose. The American Medical Association (AMA) recommends that OPEM be written at or below the sixth grade reading level. To avoid disparities in access to comprehensible health information on peripheral artery disease (PAD), it is imperative that the readability of PAD OPEM is appropriate for both English-speaking and Spanish-speaking patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the readability of PAD OPEM in Spanish and compare to English-language OPEM.

METHODS

We conducted a Google search in English and Spanish using "peripheral arterial disease" and "enfermedad arterial periferica", respectively, and the top 25 patient-accessible articles were collected for each. Articles were categorized by source type: hospital, professional society, or other. Readability of English-language OPEM was measured using the Flesch Reading Ease Readability Formula, Automated Readability Index, Coleman-Liau Index, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Gunning Fog, Linsear Write Formula, and the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook Index. Readability of Spanish OPEM was measured using the Fernández-Huerta Index and Índice Flesch-Szigriszt Scale. Readability of the articles was compared to the AMA recommendation, between English- and Spanish-language, and across sources using statistical tests appropriate to the data.

RESULTS

OPEM from professional societies represented the fewest number of English- (n = 7, 28%) and Spanish-language (n = 6, 24%) articles. Most English-speaking (n = 18, 72%) and Spanish-language (n = 20, 80%) OPEM were considered difficult as measured by the Flesch Reading Ease Readability Formula and Fernández-Huerta Index, respectively, but did not significantly differ between languages (P = 0.59). There were no significant differences in the average readability of all readability measurements across sources (hospital, professional society, or other). All the average readability grade levels for English-speaking and Spanish-language OPEM was significantly higher than the sixth grade reading level (P < 0.01). Only 3 (6%) OPEM met the AMA recommended reading level and there was no significant difference between English-language and Spanish-language OPEM (P = 1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly all Spanish-language and English-language PAD OPEM assessed were written at a reading grade level higher than recommended by the AMA. There was no significant difference in the readability of materials from hospitals or professional societies. To prevent further widening of health disparities related to literacy, health content creators, particularly hospitals and professional societies, should prioritize, develop, and ensure that English-language and Spanish-language patient education materials are written at a level appropriate for the public.

Health Literacy-Informed Communication to Reduce Discharge Medication Errors in Hospitalized Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Inadequate communication between caregivers and clinicians at hospital discharge contributes to medication dosing errors in children. Health literacy-informed communication strategies during medication counseling can reduce dosing errors but have not been tested in the pediatric hospital setting.

Objective

To test a health literacy-informed communication intervention to decrease liquid medication dosing errors compared with standard counseling in hospitalized children.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This parallel, randomized clinical trial was performed from June 22, 2021, to August 20, 2022, at a tertiary care, US children's hospital. English- and Spanish-speaking caregivers of hospitalized children 6 years or younger prescribed a new, scheduled liquid medication at discharge were included in the analysis.

Interventions

Permuted block (n = 4) randomization (1:1) to a health literacy-informed discharge medication communication bundle (n = 99) compared with standard counseling (n = 99). A study team member delivered the intervention consisting of a written, pictogram-based medication instruction sheet, teach back (caregivers state information taught), and demonstration of dosing with show back (caregivers show how they would draw the liquid medication in the syringe).

Main Outcome and Measures

Observed dosing errors, assessed using a caregiver-submitted photograph of their child's medication-filled syringe and expressed as the percentage difference from the prescribed dose. Secondary outcomes included caregiver-reported medication knowledge. Outcome measurements were blinded to participant group assignment.

Results

Among 198 caregivers randomized (mean [SD] age, 31.4 [6.5] years; 186 women [93.9%]; 36 [18.2%] Hispanic or Latino and 158 [79.8%] White), the primary outcome was available for 151 (76.3%). The observed mean (SD) percentage dosing error was 1.0% (2.2 percentage points) among the intervention group and 3.3% (5.1 percentage points) among the standard counseling group (absolute difference, 2.3 [95% CI, 1.0-3.6] percentage points; P < .001). Twenty-four of 79 caregivers in the intervention group (30.4%) measured an incorrect dose compared with 39 of 72 (54.2%) in the standard counseling group (P = .003). The intervention enhanced caregiver-reported medication knowledge compared with the standard counseling group for medication dose (71 of 76 [93.4%] vs 55 of 69 [79.7%]; P = .03), duration of administration (65 of 76 [85.5%] vs 49 of 69 [71.0%]; P = .04), and correct reporting of 2 or more medication adverse effects (60 of 76 [78.9%] vs 13 of 69 [18.8%]; P < .001). There were no differences in knowledge of medication name, indication, frequency, or storage.

Conclusions and Relevance

A health literacy-informed discharge medication communication bundle reduced home liquid medication administration errors and enhanced caregiver medication knowledge compared with standard counseling. Routine use of these standardized strategies can promote patient safety following hospital discharge.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05143047.

Health Literacy Among Patients With Acute Coronary Artery Diseases: Predictors, Consequences, and Enhancing Strategies: A Review of the Literature

The purpose of this study is to integrate evidence on predictors, consequences, in addition to the strategies for enhancing health literacy (HL) for patients with acute coronary artery diseases. An integrative review was conducted by searching four main electronic databases: the Web of Science, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and MEDLINE. Twenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final review process. The review identified the most common predictors, consequences, and relationship of HL with health outcomes in patients with acute coronary artery disease. In addition to the main strategies that enhance HL, patients with or at risk for acute coronary artery disease need a good level of HL to cope with the disease's consequences. It is recommended to include routine assessment and management of HL levels in acute coronary artery disease treatment protocols to improve clinical outcomes.

Personal Health Literacy and Life Simple 7: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

Background

Personal Health literacy (PHL) is essential in cardiovascular risk management. Hindrances in PHL can lead to poor cardiovascular outcomes.

Purpose

To investigate whether limited PHL is associated with lower likelihoods of i) overall cardiovascular health and ii) individual cardiovascular health components as defined by the American Heart Association's Life Simple (LS7).

Methods

Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis participants (N=3719; median age[range]: 59[45-84]) completed a PHL questionnaire in 2016-2018. PHL was classified as limited (score ≥10) or adequate (score <10). LS7 components were measured in 2000-2002. Robust Poisson regression was employed to compute prevalence ratios and 95% confidence intervals (PR[95%CI]) of LS7 measures.

Results

14.7% of participants had limited PHL. Limited PHL was associated with lower likelihoods of optimal LS7 (0.69[0.50, 0.95], p=0.02) and average LS7 (0.95[0.88, 1.02], p=0.15) after adjustment. Limited PHL was significantly associated with a 7% lower likelihood of ideal fasting blood glucose level after adjustment (0.93[0.89, 0.98], p<0.01).

Discussion

Limited PHL was modestly associated with suboptimal cardiovascular health and elevated blood glucose, independent of income and education.

Translation to Health Education Practice

Health educators and providers should equitably address PHL barriers to improve cardiovascular management and quality of care for patients and communities.

Neighborhood context and children's health care utilization and health outcomes: a comprehensive descriptive analysis of national survey data

While child health and health care disparities arising from unequal distribution of resources are well documented, a nationally representative inventory of health and well-being for children across the spectrum of opportunity is lacking. Using the nationally representative sample of children from pooled 2013-2017 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data linked to the census-tract-level Child Opportunity Index 2.0, a composite measure of neighborhood health, education, and socioeconomic conditions, we describe US children's socioeconomic characteristics, health care utilization and expenditures across the spectrum of child neighborhood opportunity levels. We found that neighborhood level of child opportunity was associated with almost all of children's health status, health care utilization, expenditures, access to care, and satisfaction with care outcomes. Children living in lower-opportunity neighborhoods had the highest rates of poor physical and mental health status and fewest ambulatory care visits but accounted for the highest share of emergency department visits. Their parents were also least likely to report having positive experiences with health care, good communication with providers, and easy access to care. Our findings underscore the myriad harms to children of gaps in health, education, and financial resources at the community level and provide targets for public investments to improve child-focused outcomes.

Prospective associations of health literacy with clinical outcomes in adults with CKD: findings from the CRIC study

BACKGROUND

Limited health literacy is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in the general population but the relation of health literacy with long-term clinical outcomes among adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is less clear.

METHODS

Prospective data from the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study (n = 3715) were used. Health literacy was assessed with the Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (dichotomized as limited/adequate). Cox proportional hazards models were used to separately examine the relations of health literacy with CKD progression, cardiovascular event (any of the following: myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, stroke or peripheral artery disease), and all-cause, cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality. Poisson regression was used to assess the health literacy-hospitalization association. Models were sequentially adjusted: Model 1 adjusted for potential confounders (sociodemographic factors), while Model 2 additionally adjusted for potential mediators (clinical and lifestyle factors) of the associations of interest.

RESULTS

In confounder-adjusted models, participants with limited (vs adequate) health literacy [555 (15%)] had an increased risk of CKD progression [hazard ratio (HR) 1.34; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-1.71], cardiovascular event (HR 1.67; 95% CI 1.39-2.00), hospitalization (rate ratio 1.33; 95% CI 1.26-1.40), and all-cause (HR 1.54; 95% CI 1.27-1.86), cardiovascular (HR 2.39; 95% CI 1.69-3.38) and non-cardiovascular (HR 1.27; 95% CI 1.01-1.60) mortality. Additional adjustments for potential mediators (Model 2) showed similar results except that the relations of health literacy with CKD progression and non-cardiovascular mortality were no longer statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

In the CRIC Study, adults with limited (vs adequate) health literacy had a higher risk for CKD progression, cardiovascular event, hospitalization and mortality-regardless of adjustment for potential confounders.

Evaluation of Health Literacy Levels and Associated Factors Among Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Heart Failure in Qatar

PURPOSE

To determine the prevalence of inadequate health literacy and its associated risk factors among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and/or heart failure (HF) in Qatar.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional observational study was conducted among patients with ACS and/or HF attending the national Heart Hospital in Qatar. Health literacy was assessed using the abbreviated version of the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (S-TOFHLA) and the Three-item Brief Health Literacy Screen (3-item BHLS).

RESULTS

Three hundred patients with ACS and/or HF, majority male (88%) and non-Qatari (94%), participated in the study. The median (IQR) age of the participants was 55 (11) years. The prevalence of inadequate to marginal health literacy ranged between 36% and 54%. There were statistically significant differences in health literacy level between patients based on their marital status (p=0.010), education (p≤0.001), ability to speak any of Arabic, English, Hindi, Urdu, Malayalam, or other languages (p-values ≤0.001 to 0.035), country of origin (p≤0.001), occupation (p≤0.001), and receiving information from a pharmacist (p=0.008), a physiotherapist (p≤0.001), or a nurse (p=0.004).

CONCLUSION

Inadequate health literacy is common among patients with ACS and/or HF. This study suggests a need for developing strategies to assist healthcare professionals in improving health literacy skills among patients with ACS and HF. A combination of interventions may be needed to improve patients' understanding of their disease and medications, and ultimately overall health outcomes.

Health Literacy and Serious or Persistent Mental Illness: A Mixed Methods Study

BACKGROUND

Health literacy is increasingly recognized as a major determinant of health; however, our insights into the health literacy strengths and needs of adults living with serious or persistent mental illness remain limited by a notable lack of research in this area. Improving our understanding is important because people in this group are especially vulnerable to numerous negative health outcomes, many preventable.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the health literacy strengths and needs of people living with serious or persistent mental illness in terms of their ability to acquire, understand, and use information about their illness and the health services they require.

METHODS

A cross-sectional convergent mixed methods design guided by the Ophelia Access and Equity Framework. People diagnosed with serious or persistent mental illness were offered participation. Quantitative and qualitative data was collected using questionnaires (Health Literacy Questionnaire [HLQ], World Health Organization [WHO-5]) and semi-structured interviews. Hierarchical cluster analysis identified and grouped participants with similar health literacy scores into mutually exclusive groups, for the development of clinical vignettes.

KEY RESULTS

Participants struggled most with the appraisal of health information (HLQ mean 2.72, standard deviation [SD] .63 [scale 1-4]) and navigating what they often perceived to be a confusing health care system (HLQ mean 3.29, SD .79 [scale 1-5]). On the other hand, most participants reported positive experiences with their health care providers (HLQ mean 3.19, SD .62 [scale 1-4]) and generally felt understood and supported. The cluster analysis suggests we should not assume people living with serious or persistent mental illness have homogeneous HL strengths and needs, meaning a one-size-fits-all solution for improving health literacy in this diverse group will likely not be a successful strategy. It will be important to explore solutions that embrace patient-centered care approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is one of only a handful assessing the health literacy strengths and needs of people living with serious or persistent mental illness. By collecting both quantitative and qualitative data, then analyzing the results using sophisticated cluster analysis methods, the authors were able to develop clinical vignettes per the Ophelia Framework that offer results in a practical way that can be readily understood and acted upon by stakeholders. We found that the HLQ is a measure of HL that is acceptable to mental health clients, and our findings provide preliminary data on the use of this instrument in the mental health population. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2023;7(1):e2-e13.] Plain Language Summary: This study explored the health literacy strengths and needs of people living with serious or persistent mental illness. The results showed a mix of strengths and needs among our participants, though several consistent themes emerged. Most of our participants felt understood and supported by their health care providers, but many often struggle with judging the quality of health information and finding their way through the health care system.

Understanding and mitigating low health literacy

To take control of their health, patients and their families and carers need to understand the information they receive from healthcare professionals and be able to apply that information - in short, they require optimal health literacy. People with low health literacy may find it challenging to manage their condition and take steps to prevent ill-health, which may lead to an increased use of healthcare services. Low health literacy is one of the main barriers preventing healthcare professionals from adequately transmitting information to people in their care. It is crucial that nurses do not assume that everyone will understand information about their health, so nurses should adapt their communication and create an environment where people feel empowered to ask questions. This article describes factors affecting health literacy, explains the consequences of low health literacy, and identifies strategies and techniques nurses can use to mitigate low health literacy.

Impact of low health literacy on patients' health outcomes: a multicenter cohort study

Background

This study aims to assess the health literacy of medical patients admitted to hospitals and examine its correlation with patients’ emergency department visits, hospital readmissions, and durations of hospital stay.

Methods

This prospective cohort study recruited patients admitted to the general internal medicine units at the two urban tertiary care hospitals. Health literacy was measured using the full-length Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults. Logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the correlation between health literacy and the desired outcomes. The primary outcome of interest of this study was to determine the correlation between health literacy and emergency department revisit within 90 days of discharge. The secondary outcomes of interest were to assess the correlation between health literacy and length of stay and hospital readmission within 90 days of discharge.

Results

We found that 50% had adequate health literacy, 32% had inadequate, and 18% of patients had marginal health literacy. Patients with inadequate health literacy were more likely to revisit the emergency department as compared to patients with adequate health literacy (odds ratio: 3.0; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.3–6.9, p = 0.01). In patients with inadequate health literacy, the mean predicted probability of emergency department revisits was 0.22 ± 0.11 if their education level was some high school or less and 0.57 ± 0.18 if they had completed college. No significant correlation was noted between health literacy and duration of hospital stay or readmission.

Conclusions

Only half of the patients admitted to the general internal medicine unit had adequate health literacy. Patients with low health literacy, but high education, had a higher probability of emergency department revisits.

Readmission rates and predictors of avoidable readmissions in older adults in a tertiary care centre

Context

Thirty-day readmissions are used to gauge health care accountability, which occurs as part of the natural course of the illness or due to avoidable fallacies during the index admission. The utility of this metric is unknown in older adults from developing countries.

Aim

To ascertain the unplanned 30-day readmission rate and enumerate predictors of avoidable hospital readmission among early (0-7 days) and late (8-30 days) readmissions.

Settings and Design

A retrospective chart audit of 140 older adults who were readmitted to a premier tertiary care teaching hospital under Geriatrics from the neighboring states of Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, and Kerala were undertaken.

Methods and Materials

Data from health records were collected from the hospital electronic database from May 2015 to May 2020. The data was reviewed to determine the 30-day readmission rate and to ascertain the predictors of avoidable readmissions among both early and late readmissions.

Results

Out of 2698 older adults admitted to the geriatric wards from the catchment areas, the calculated 30-day hospital readmission rate was 5.18%, and 41.4% of these readmissions were potentially avoidable. The median duration from discharge to the first readmission was ten days (Interquartile range: 5-18 days). Patients had to spend INR 44,000 (approximately 602 USD) towards avoidable readmission. The most common causes for readmission included an exacerbation, reactivation, or progression of a previously existing disease (55.7%), followed by the emergence of a new disease unrelated to index admission (43.2%). Fifty-eight patients (41.4%) were readmitted within seven days following discharge. Early readmissions were seen in patients with malignancies [8 (13.5%) vs. 4 (4.8%); P = 0.017], on insulin (P = 0.04) or on antidepressants (P = 0.01). Advanced age was found to be an independent predictor of avoidable early readmission (OR 2.99 95%CI 1.34-6.62, P = 0.007), and admission to a general ward (as compared to those admitted in a private ward) was an independent predictor of early readmissions (OR 2.99 95%CI 1.34-6.62, P = 0.007).

Conclusion

The 30-day readmission rate in a geriatric unit in a tertiary care hospital was 5.2%. Advanced age was considered to be an independent predictor of avoidable early readmission. Future prospective research on avoidable readmissions should be undertaken to delineate factors affecting 30-day avoidable hospital readmissions in developing nations.

Impact of health literacy in patients with cardiovascular diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the impacts of health literacy on mortality, readmission, and quality of life (QOL) in the secondary or tertiary prevention of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) through a meta-analysis.

METHODS

Six electronic databases were searched on June 11, 2020. Observational studies involving patients with CVD, health literacy as an exposure factor and mortality, readmission, or QOL as outcomes were included in this study. Two researchers screened the retrieved articles and extracted data independently. The meta-analysis calculated the pooled relative risk of mortality and readmission. We also assessed the body of evidence based on Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).

RESULTS

Following screening of 1616 studies, 16 observational studies were included. The mean rate of low health literacy was 32.8%. All studies focusing on QOL showed significant impacts of health literacy. Pooled relative risk was 1.621 (95% confidence interval: 1.089-2.412) for mortality and 1.184 (95% confidence interval: 1.035-1.355) for readmission, indicating significant effects of health literacy. GRADE assessment showed "LOW" certainty for each outcome.

CONCLUSION

Low health literacy was significantly associated with increased mortality and hospital readmission and decreased QOL in patients with CVD.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Considering low health literacy in clinical practice is very important to improve prognosis of CVD patients.

Association of Health Literacy and Numeracy With Lupus Knowledge and the Creation of the Lupus Knowledge Assessment Test

OBJECTIVE

Limited health literacy and numeracy are associated with worse patient-reported outcomes and higher disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but which factors may mediate this association is unknown. We sought to determine the association of health literacy and numeracy with SLE knowledge.

METHODS

Patients with SLE were recruited from an academic center clinic. Participants completed validated assessments of health literacy (Newest Vital Sign [NVS]; n = 96) and numeracy (Numeracy Understanding in Medicine Instrument, Short Version [S-NUMI]; n = 85). They also completed the Lupus Knowledge Assessment Test (LKAT), which consists of 4 questions assessing SLE knowledge that were determined through consensus expert opinion for their wide applicability and importance related to self-management of the disease. Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression modeling were used to analyze the results.

RESULTS

In our SLE cohort (n = 125), 33% (32/96) had limited health literacy and 76% (65/85) had limited numeracy. The majority correctly identified that hydroxychloroquine prevented SLE flares (91%); however, only 23% of participants correctly answered a numeracy question assessing which urine protein to creatinine (UPC) ratio was > 1000 mg/g. The mean LKAT score was 2.7 out of 4.0. Limited health literacy, but not numeracy, was associated with lower knowledge about SLE as measured by the LKAT, even after adjusting for education.

CONCLUSION

Patients with SLE with limited health literacy had lower knowledge about SLE. The LKAT could be further refined and/or used as a screening tool to identify patients with knowledge gaps. Further work is needed to improve patients' understanding of proteinuria and investigate whether literacy-sensitive education can improve care.

Health literacy and long-term health outcomes following myocardial infarction: protocol for a multicentre, prospective cohort study (ENHEARTEN study)

INTRODUCTION

Low health literacy is common in people with cardiovascular disease and may be one factor that affects an individual's ability to maintain secondary prevention health behaviours following myocardial infarction (MI). However, little is known about the association between health literacy and longer-term health outcomes in people with MI. The ENhancing HEAlth literacy in secondary pRevenTion of cardiac evENts (ENHEARTEN) study aims to examine the relationship between health literacy and a number of health outcomes (including healthcare costs) in a cohort of patients following their first MI. Findings may provide evidence for the significance of health literacy as a predictor of long-term cardiac outcomes.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

ENHEARTEN is a multicentre, prospective observational study in a convenience sample of adults (aged >18 years) with their first MI. A total of 450 patients will be recruited over 2 years across two metropolitan health services and one rural/regional health service in Victoria, Australia. The primary outcome of this study will be all-cause, unplanned hospital admissions within 6 months of index admission. Secondary outcomes include cardiac-related hospital admissions up to 24 months post-MI, emergency department presentations, health-related quality of life, mortality, cardiac rehabilitation attendance and healthcare costs. Health literacy will be observed as a predictor variable and will be determined using the 12-item version of the European Health Literacy Survey (HLS-Q12).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval for this study has been received from the relevant human research ethics committee (HREC) at each of the participating health services (lead site Monash Health HREC; approval number: RES-21-0000-242A) and Services Australia HREC (reference number: RMS1672). Informed written consent will be sought from all participants. Study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and collated in reports for participating health services and participants.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN12621001224819.

The Relationship Between Health Literacy and Quality of Life, Attitudes and Perceptions of Covid-19 and Vaccination Among Patients with Systemic Autoimmune Diseases

We aimed to evaluate health literacy in a population of patients with systemic autoimmune diseases (SAD), and to analyze their potential relationships with health-related quality of life (HRQoL), attitudes and beliefs of Covid-19 and vaccination, and perceptions of changes in medical care during the pandemic. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 395 patients (81.1% were living in Spain). An anonymous online survey was distributed to an online SAD association. Health literacy was measured using the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q16) and the SF-36 tool was used to assess HRQoL. More than half of patients (57.7%) have inadequate health literacy and the mean health literacy level was 9.63(5.66). Patients with inadequate health literacy levels presented the lowest HRQoL scores in all SF-36 domains (p < .001). Health literacy scores were positively correlated with all SF-36 domains (p < .001). The reservations to get vaccinated against Covid-19 were linked to health literacy level (p = 0.024). There are high levels of inadequate health literacy among patients with SAD and it is associated with worse HRQoL and risk attitudes about Covid-19 vaccination and medical care during the pandemic.

A Prospective Observational Study Assessing the Impacts of Health Literacy and Psychosocial Determinants of Health on 30-day Readmission Risk

Our objective was to assess the utility of an assessment battery capturing health literacy (HL) and biopsychosocial determinants of health in predicting 30-day readmission in comparison to a currently well-adopted readmission risk calculator. We also sought to capture the distribution of inpatient HL, with emphasis on inadequate and marginal HL (an intermediate HL level). A prospective observational study was conducted to obtain HL and biopsychosocial data on general medicine inpatients admitted to the UCLA health system. Five hundred thirty-seven subjects were tracked prospectively for 30-day readmission after index hospitalization. HL was significantly better at predicting readmission compared to LACE + (Length, admission acuity, comorbidities, emergency room visits) alone (P = .013). A multivariate model including education, insurance, and language comfort was a strong predictor of adequate HL (P < .001). In conclusion, HL offered significant improvement in risk stratification in comparison to LACE + alone. Patients with marginal HL were high-risk, albeit difficult to characterize. Incorporating robust HL and biopsychosocial determinant assessments may allow hospital systems to allocate educational resources towards at-risk patients, thereby mitigating readmission risk.

Understanding the surgical experience for Black and White patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): The importance of health literacy

BACKGROUND

Racial/ethnic disparities in outcomes exist for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) undergoing surgery. The underlying mechanism(s) remain unclear and patient perspectives are needed. We therefore aimed to characterize the surgical experience for Black and White IBD patients using qualitative methods.

METHODS

Patients with IBD who had undergone surgery were recruited to same-race qualitative interviews. Semi-structured interviews explored barriers and facilitators to a positive or negative surgical experience. Transcripts were analyzed with NVivo 12 software.

RESULTS

Six focus groups were conducted that included 10 Black and 17 White IBD participants. The mean age was 44.8 years (SD 13.2), 52% were male and 65% had Crohn's disease. Four themes emerged that most defined the surgical experience: the impact of the IBD diagnosis, the quality of provided information, disease management and the surgery itself. Within these themes, barriers to a positive surgical experience included inadequate personal knowledge of IBD, ineffective written and verbal communication, lack of a support system and complications after surgery. Both groups reported that information was provided inconsistently which led to unclear expectations of surgical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Black and White patients with IBD have varied surgical experiences but all stressed the importance of accurate, trustworthy and understandable health information. These findings highlight the value of providing health literacy-sensitive care in surgery.

Impact of Health Literacy on Satisfaction Following Male Prosthetic Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a patient's health literacy impacts patient satisfaction following inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) or artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients who underwent IPP or AUS between January 1^st 2016 and July 31^st 2020 was performed. A telephone questionnaire assessed overall satisfaction and if patients would undergo surgery again. Health literacy was measured using the Brief Health Literacy Screen (BHLS). Multivariate ordinal logistic regression was used to assess the association between health literacy and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

At a median follow up of 2.4 years, 113 (70%) of the 162 IPP patients were either satisfied or very satisfied with their procedure and 120 (74%) patients would undergo surgery again. Of the 76 AUS patients, 65 (86%) were either satisfied or very satisfied with their procedure and 65 (86%) patients would undergo surgery again. After adjustment for potential confounders, increasing BHLS score was significantly associated with satisfaction for both IPP (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.11-1.54; p=0.001) and AUS surgery (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.02-1.56; p=0.034), as well as with likelihood of undergoing IPP surgery again (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.25-1.87; p<0.001). BHLS was not associated, however, with likelihood of undergoing AUS surgery again (p=0.403).

CONCLUSIONS

Men with lower health literacy are less likely to be satisfied following prosthetic surgery. The BHLS is an important tool that can be used to identify patients who may benefit from increased preoperative counseling to improve patient expectations and quality of life following prosthetic surgery.

Health Literacy in Surgical Oncology Patients: An Observational Study at a Comprehensive Cancer Center

BACKGROUND

Low health literacy is associated with increased resource use and poorer outcomes in medical and surgical patients with various diseases. This observational study was designed to determine (1) the prevalence of low health literacy among surgical patients with cancer at an NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC), and (2) associations between health literacy and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Patients receiving surgery (N=218) for gastrointestinal (60%) or genitourinary cancers (22%) or sarcomas (18%) were recruited during their postsurgical hospitalization. Patients self-reported health literacy using the Brief Health Literacy Screening Tool (BRIEF). Clinical data (length of stay [LoS], postacute care needs, and unplanned presentation for care within 30 days) were abstracted from the electronic medical records 90 days after surgery. Multivariate linear and logistic regressions were used to examine the relationship between health literacy and clinical outcomes, adjusting for potential confounding variables.

RESULTS

Of 218 participants, 31 (14%) showed low health literacy (BRIEF score ≤12). In regression analyses including 212 patients with complete data, low health literacy significantly predicted LoS (β = -1.82; 95% CI, -3.00 to -0.66; P=.002) and postacute care needs (odds ratio [OR], 0.25; 95% CI, 0.07-0.91). However, health literacy was not significantly associated with unplanned presentation for care in the 30 days after surgery (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.20-1.29).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the prevalence of low health literacy in a surgical cancer population at a high-volume NCI-designated CCC and its association with important clinical outcomes, including hospital LoS and postacute care needs. Universal screening and patient navigation may be 2 approaches to mitigate the impact of low health literacy on postsurgical outcomes.

Interventions to Improve Communication at Hospital Discharge and Rates of Readmission: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

Shortcomings in the education of patients at hospital discharge are associated with higher risks for treatment failure and hospital readmission. Whether improving communication at discharge through specific interventions has an association with patient-relevant outcomes remains unclear.

Objective

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the association of communication interventions at hospital discharge with readmission rates and other patient-relevant outcomes.

Data Sources

PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL were systematically searched from the inception of each database to February 28, 2021.

Study Selection

Randomized clinical trials that randomized patients to receiving a discharge communication intervention or a control group were included.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Two independent reviewers extracted data on outcomes and trial and patient characteristics. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Data were pooled using a random-effects model, and risk ratios (RRs) with corresponding 95% CIs are reported. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was hospital readmission, and secondary outcomes included adherence to treatment regimen, patient satisfaction, mortality, and emergency department reattendance 30 days after hospital discharge.

Results

We included 60 randomized clinical trials with a total of 16 070 patients for the qualitative synthesis and 19 trials with a total of 3953 patients for the quantitative synthesis of the primary outcome. Of these, 11 trials had low risk of bias, 6 trials had high risk of bias, and 2 trials had unclear risk of bias. Communication interventions at discharge were significantly associated with lower readmission rates (179 of 1959 patients [9.1%] in intervention groups vs 270 of 1994 patients [13.5%] in control groups; RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56-0.84), higher adherence to treatment regimen (1729 of 2009 patients [86.1%] in intervention groups vs 1599 of 2024 patients [79.0%] in control groups; RR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.13-1.37), and higher patient satisfaction (1187 of 1949 patients [60.9%] in intervention groups vs 991 of 2002 patients [49.5%] in control groups; RR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.20-1.66).

Conclusions and Relevance

These findings suggest that communication interventions at discharge are significantly associated with fewer hospital readmissions, higher treatment adherence, and higher patient satisfaction and thus are important to facilitate the transition of care.

Teaching plain language to medical students: improving communication with disadvantaged patients

BACKGROUND

Low health literacy underpins health inequality and leads to poor adherence to medical care and higher risk of adverse events and rehospitalization. Communication in plain language, therefore, is an essential skill for health professionals to acquire. Most medical education communication skill programs focus on verbal communication, while written communication training is scarce. ETGAR is a student delivered service for vulnerable patients after hospital discharge in which, amongst other duties, students 'translate' the medical discharge letters into plain language and share them with patients at a home visit. This study ascertains how this plain language training impacted on students' written communication skills using a tool designed for purpose.

METHODS

Students, in pairs, wrote three plain language discharge letters over the course of a year for patients whom they encountered in hospital. The students handed over and shared the letters with the patients during a post-discharge home visit. Structured feedback from course instructors was given for each letter. An assessment tool was developed to evaluate students' ability to tell the hospitalization narrative using plain and clear language. First and last letters were blindly evaluated for the entire cohort (74 letters; 87 students).

RESULTS

Students scored higher in all assessment categories in the third letters, with significant improvement in overall score 3.5 ± 0.8 vs 4.1 ± 0.6 Z = -3.43, p = 0.001. The assessment tool's reliability was high α = 0.797, it successfully differentiated between plain language categories, and its score was not affected by letter length or patient's medical condition.

CONCLUSIONS

Plain language discharge letters written for real patients in the context of experience-based learning improved in quality, providing students with skills to work effectively in an environment where poor health literacy is prevalent. ETGAR may serve as a model for learning written communication skills during clinical years, using the assessment tool for formative or summative evaluation.

Impact of low health literacy on healthcare utilization in individuals with cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes and mental disorders. A Danish population-based 4-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Previous research from the USA has shown that low health literacy is associated with higher hospitalization rates and higher rates of emergency service use. However, studies in a European context using more comprehensive health literacy definitions are lacking. The aim was to study the impact of low health literacy on healthcare utilization in a Danish context.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, baseline survey data from 2013 were derived from a large Danish health and morbidity survey and merged with individual-level longitudinal register data for a 4-year follow-up period. The study included people in the general population (n = 29 473) and subgroups of people with four different chronic conditions: cardiovascular disease (CVD) (n = 2389), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (n = 1214), diabetes (n = 1685) and mental disorders (n = 1577).

RESULTS

In the general population, low health literacy predicted slightly more visits to the general practitioner and admissions to hospital and longer hospitalization periods at 4 years of follow-up, whereas low health literacy did not predict planned outpatient visits or emergency room visits. In people with CVD, low health literacy predicted more days with emergency room visits. In people with mental disorders, difficulties in actively engaging with healthcare providers were associated with a higher number of hospital admission days. No significant association between health literacy and healthcare utilization was found for diabetes or COPD.

CONCLUSIONS

Even though Denmark has a universal healthcare system the level of health literacy affects healthcare use in the general population and in people with CVD and mental disorders.

Association of Medicaid Expansion With Quality in Safety-Net Hospitals

IMPORTANCE

Safety-net hospitals (SNHs) operate under limited financial resources and have had challenges providing high-quality care. Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act led to improvements in hospital finances, but whether this was associated with better hospital quality, particularly among SNHs given their baseline financial constraints, remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To compare changes in quality from 2012 to 2018 between SNHs in states that expanded Medicaid vs those in states that did not.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Using a difference-in-differences analysis in a cohort study, performance on quality measures was compared between SNHs, defined as those in the highest quartile of uncompensated care in the pre-Medicaid expansion period, in expansion vs nonexpansion states, before and after the implementation of Medicaid expansion. A total of 811 SNHs were included in the analysis, with 316 in nonexpansion states and 495 in expansion states. The study was conducted from January to November 2020.

EXPOSURES

Time-varying indicators for Medicaid expansion status.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was hospital quality measured by patient-reported experience (Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Survey), health care-associated infections (central line-associated bloodstream infections, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, and surgical site infections following colon surgery) and patient outcomes (30-day mortality and readmission rates for acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia). Secondary outcomes included hospital financial measures (uncompensated care and operating margins), adoption of electronic health records, provision of safety-net services (enabling, linguistic/translation, and transportation services), or safety-net service lines (trauma, burn, obstetrics, neonatal intensive, and psychiatric care).

RESULTS

In this difference-in-differences analysis of a cohort of 811 SNHs, no differential changes in patient-reported experience, health care-associated infections, readmissions, or mortality were noted, regardless of Medicaid expansion status after the Affordable Care Act. There were modest differential increases between 2012 and 2016 in the adoption of electronic health records (mean [SD]: nonexpansion states, 99.4 [7.4] vs 99.9 [3.8]; expansion states, 94.6 [22.6] vs 100.0 [2.2]; 1.7 percentage points; P = .02) and between 2012 and 2018 in the number of inpatient psychiatric beds (mean [SD]: nonexpansion states, 24.7 [36.0] vs 23.6 [39.0]; expansion states: 29.3 [42.8] vs 31.4 [44.3]; 1.4 beds; P = .02) among SNHs in expansion states, although they were not statistically significant at a threshold adjusted for multiple comparisons. In subgroup analyses comparing SNHs with higher vs lower baseline operating margins, an isolated differential improvement was noted in heart failure readmissions among SNHs with lower baseline operating margins in expansion states (mean [SD], 22.8 [2.1]; -0.53 percentage points; P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This difference-in-differences cohort study found that despite reductions in uncompensated care and improvements in operating margins, there appears to be little evidence of quality improvement among SNHs in states that expanded Medicaid compared with those in states that did not.

A Culturally Relevant Care Model to Reduce Health Disparities Among Medicaid Recipients

Health disparities among Hispanics are associated with poorer health status across multiple health conditions, greater use of high-acuity services, and lower use of care continuity and preventive services. A new integrated delivery organization (IDO) designed around culturally responsive care aims to reduce health disparities and improve health outcomes among the Hispanic community by deploying a multifeatured approach. The IDO combines the universal administration of a culturally sensitive health risk screening tool, the delivery of culturally appropriate medical, behavioral and spiritual health, and creative support of provider practices with training and informational resources, financial incentives, actionable data, technology, and cultural sensitivity training for providers and staff. The IDO further distinguishes its unique approach by partnering with a university informatics program to establish a local learning health care system destined to enrich the evidence base for culturally appropriate interventions that reduce health disparities. Longitudinal research is currently underway that focuses on the impact of culturally motivated interventions on resource utilization, retention, and quality.

Prevalence of low health literacy levels in decompensated heart failure compared with acute myocardial infarction patients

AIMS

Health literacy (HL) is a health determinant in cardiovascular diseases as the active participation of patients is essential for optimizing self-management of these conditions. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of low HL level in patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) and explore low HL determinants.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A prospective cross-sectional study was performed in three cardiology units. HL level was assessed using Brief Health Literacy Screen (BHLS) and categorized as low or adequate. Dimensions of HL were assessed with the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). Associations with sociodemographic factors, disease history, and comorbidities were explored. A total of 208 patients were included, mean ± SD age was 68.5 ± 14.9 years, and 65.9% were men. Patients with ADHF were significantly older and more often women than AMI patients. Prevalence of low HL was 36% overall, 51% in ADHF patients, and 21% in AMI patients (P < 0.001). After adjustment for sociodemographic factors, patients with lower income (€<10 000 per year, adjusted odds ratio = 10.46 95% confidence interval [2.38; 54.51], P = 0.003) and native language other than French (adjusted odds ratio = 14.36 95% confidence interval [3.76; 66.9], P < 0.002) were more likely to have low HL. ADHF patients presented significantly lower HLQ scores than AMI patients in five out of the nine HLQ dimensions reflecting challenges in access to healthcare.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence of low HL was higher among ADHF patients than among AMI patients. Low HL ADHF patients needed more support when accessing healthcare services, and these would require more adaptation to respond to low HL patients' needs.

Social determinants of health affect unplanned readmissions following acute myocardial infarction

Background: Low socioeconomic status predicts inferior clinical outcomes in many patient populations. The effects of patient insurance status and hospital safety-net status on readmission rates following acute myocardial infarction are unclear. Materials & methods: A retrospective review of State Inpatient Databases for New York, California, Florida and Maryland, 2007-2014. Results: A total of 1,055,162 patients were included. Medicaid status was associated with 37.7 and 44.0% increases in risk-adjusted readmission odds at 30 and 90 days (p < 0.0001). Uninsured status was associated with reduced odds of readmission at both time points. High-burden safety-net status was associated with 9.6 and 9.5% increased odds of readmission at 30 and 90 days (p < 0.0003). Conclusion: Insurance status and hospital safety-net burden affect readmission odds following acute myocardial infarction.

Low health numeracy is associated with higher disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

Evidence suggests low health literacy is prevalent in the United States and associated with worse clinical outcomes, yet few studies have investigated health literacy in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of low health literacy and numeracy in lupus patients and to examine its association with disease characteristics.

METHODS

Patients with SLE were recruited from an academic center clinic. Participants completed in-person assessments of health literacy (Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine, REALM) and numeracy (Numeracy Understanding in Medicine Instrument Shortened Version, S-NUMi). Clinical disease activity measures were obtained, including urine protein to creatinine ratio (UPC), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) and physician global assessment (PhGA) scores.

RESULTS

Ninety-five SLE patients participated in the study; 13% had low health literacy and 73% had limited health numeracy. Patients with lower health literacy and numeracy were more likely to be Black, have Medicaid insurance, and earn income <$50 K annually. In linear regression models, patients with limited health numeracy had, on average, PhGA scores 0.31 points higher (95% CI: 0.02, 0.60) than patients with adequate numeracy, after adjusting for race and age. No clinical outcomes were associated with health literacy.

CONCLUSION

In this exploratory study, we found SLE patients with low numeracy had higher disease activity. Our findings indicate that lower health literacy and numeracy are more common among Black and socioeconomically disadvantaged patients. Additional research will be needed to investigate the impact of health literacy on other outcomes and racial disparities in SLE.

Treatment selection and medication adherence for stable angina: The role of area-based health literacy

RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES

Clinical studies show equivalent health outcomes from interventional procedures and treatment with medication only for stable angina patients. However, patients may be subject to overuse or access barriers for interventional procedures and may exhibit suboptimal adherence to medications. Our objective is to evaluate whether community-level health literacy is associated with treatment selection and medication adherence patterns.

METHOD

The sample included Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries (20% random sample) with stable angina in 2007-2013. We used an area-level health literacy variable because of the lack of an individual measure in claims. We measured the association between (a) area-based health literacy with treatment selection (medication only, percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI], or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery) and (b) area-based health literacy with medication adherence. We controlled for other factors including demographics, co-morbidity burden, dual eligibility, and area deprivation index.

RESULTS

We identified 8300 patients of whom 8.7% lived in a low health literacy area. Overall, 56% of patients received medication only, 28% received PCI, and 15% received CABG. Patients in low health literacy areas were less likely to receive CABG (-3.5 percentage points; 95% CI, -6.8 to -0.3) than were patients in high health literacy areas, but the significance was sensitive to specification. Overall, 81.5% and 71.5% of patients were adherent to antianginals and statins, respectively. Living in low health literacy areas was associated with lower adherence to antianginals (-3.3 percentage points; 95% CI, -6.1 to -0.6) but not statins.

CONCLUSIONS

Low area-based health literacy was associated with being less likely to receive CABG and lower adherence, but the differences between low and high health literacy areas were small and sensitive to model specification. Individual factors such as dual eligibility status and race/ethnicity had stronger associations with outcomes than had area-based health literacy, suggesting that this area-based measure was inadequate to account for social determinants in this study.

Investigating Health Literacy in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: a Descriptive Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Inadequate health literacy is common among American adults, but little is known about the impact of health literacy in rheumatic diseases. The purpose of this article is to review studies investigating health literacy and its association with clinical outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

RECENT FINDINGS

Several validated health literacy measures have been examined in SLE patients. Low health literacy is associated with worse patient-reported outcomes and lower numeracy with higher disease activity. Two studies found no association of low health literacy with medication adherence. One randomized controlled trial tested a medication decision aid among patients with low health literacy. We found a paucity of studies exploring health literacy in SLE. Low health literacy is associated with worse patient-reported outcomes and limited numeracy with higher disease activity in SLE. Further studies are needed exploring the impact of low health literacy on clinical outcomes and the effectiveness of literacy-sensitive interventions.

Low Health Literacy Exists in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Population and Is Disproportionately Prevalent in Older African Americans

BACKGROUND

Low health literacy is common in general populations, but its prevalence in the inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) population is unclear. The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of low health literacy in a diverse IBD population and to identify risk factors for low health literacy.

METHODS

Adult patients with IBD at a single institution from November 2017 to May 2018 were assessed for health literacy using the Newest Vital Sign (NVS). Demographic and socioeconomic data were also collected. Primary outcome was the prevalence of low health literacy. Secondary outcomes were length-of-stay (LOS) and 30-day readmissions after surgical encounters. Bivariate comparisons and multivariable regression were used for analyses.

RESULTS

Of 175 IBD patients, 59% were women, 23% were African Americans, 91% had Crohn disease, and mean age was 46 years (SD = 16.7). The overall prevalence of low health literacy was 24%. Compared to white IBD patients, African Americans had significantly higher prevalence of low health literacy (47.5% vs 17.0%, P < 0.05). On multivariable analysis, low health literacy was associated with older age and African American race (P < 0.05). Of 83 IBD patients undergoing abdominal surgery, mean postoperative LOS was 5.5 days and readmission rate was 28.9%. There was no significant difference between LOS and readmissions rates by health literacy levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Low health literacy is present in IBD populations and more common among older African Americans. Opportunities exist for providing more health literacy-sensitive care in IBD to address disparities and to benefit those with low health literacy.

Creation and Institutional Validation of a Readmission Risk Calculator for Elective Colorectal Surgery

BACKGROUND

Readmissions reflect adverse patient outcomes, and clinicians currently lack accurate models to predict readmission risk.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to create a readmission risk calculator for use in the postoperative setting after elective colon and rectal surgery.

DESIGN

Patients were identified from 2012-2014 American College of Surgery-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data. A model was created with 60% of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program sample using multivariable logistic regression to stratify patients into low/medium- and high-risk categories. The model was validated with the remaining 40% of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program sample and 2016-2018 institutional data.

SETTINGS

The study included both national and institutional data.

PATIENTS

Patients who underwent elective abdominal colon or rectal resection were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was readmission within 30 days of surgery. Secondary outcomes included reasons for and time interval to readmission.

RESULTS

The model discrimination (c-statistic) was 0.76 ((95% CI, 0.75-0.76); p < 0.0001) in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program model creation cohort (n = 50,508), 0.70 ((95% CI, 0.69-0.70); p < 0.0001) in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program validation cohort (n = 33,714), and 0.62 ((95% CI, 0.54-0.70); p = 0.04) in the institutional cohort (n = 400). High risk was designated as ≥8.7% readmission risk. Readmission rates in National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and institutional data were 10.7% and 8.8% overall; of patients predicted to be high risk, observed readmission rate was 22.1% in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and 12.4% in the institutional cohorts. Overall median interval from surgery to readmission was 14 days in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and 11 days institutionally. The most common reasons for readmission were organ space infection, bowel obstruction/paralytic ileus, and dehydration in both the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and institutional data.

LIMITATIONS

This was a retrospective observational review.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients who undergo elective colon and rectal surgery, use of a readmission risk calculator developed for postoperative use can identify high-risk patients for potential amelioration of modifiable risk factors, more intensive outpatient follow-up, or planned readmission. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B284. CREACIÓN Y VALIDACIÓN INSTITUCIONAL DE UNA CALCULADORA DE RIESGO DE REINGRESO PARA CIRUGÍA COLORRECTAL ELECTIVE: Los reingresos reflejan resultados adversos de los pacientes y los médicos actualmente carecen de modelos precisos para predecir el riesgo de reingreso.Intentamos crear una calculadora de riesgo de readmisión para su uso en el entorno postoperatorio después de una cirugía electiva de colon y recto.Los pacientes que se sometieron a una resección electiva del colon abdominal o rectal se identificaron a partir de los datos del Programa Nacional de Mejora de la Calidad Quirúrgica (ACS-NSQIP) del Colegio Americano de Cirugia Nacional 2012-2014. Se creó un modelo con el 60% de la muestra NSQIP utilizando regresión logística multivariable para estratificar a los pacientes en categorías de riesgo bajo / medio y alto. El modelo fue validado con el 40% restante de la muestra NSQIP y datos institucionales 2016-2018.El estudio incluyó datos tanto nacionales como institucionales.El resultado primario fue el reingreso dentro de los 30 días de la cirugía. Los resultados secundarios incluyeron razones e intervalo de tiempo para el reingreso.La discriminación del modelo (estadística c) fue de 0,76 (IC del 95%: 0,75-0,76, p < 0,0001) en la cohorte de creación del modelo NSQIP (n = 50,508), 0,70 (IC del 95%: 0,69-0,70, p < 0,0001) en la cohorte de validación NSQIP (n = 33,714), y 0,62 (IC del 95%: 0,54-0,70, p = 0,04) en la cohorte institucional (n = 400). Alto riesgo se designó como > 8,7% de riesgo de readmisión. Las tasas de readmisión en NSQIP y los datos institucionales fueron del 10,7% y del 8,8% en general; de pacientes con riesgo alto, la tasa de reingreso observada fue del 22.1% en el NSQIP y del 12.4% en las cohortes institucionales. El intervalo medio general desde la cirugía hasta el reingreso fue de 14 días en NSQIP y 11 días institucionalmente. Las razones más comunes para el reingreso fueron infección del espacio orgánico, obstrucción intestinal / íleo paralítico y deshidratación tanto en NSQIP como en datos institucionales.Esta fue una revisión observacional retrospectiva.Para los pacientes que se someten a cirugía electiva de colon y recto, el uso de una calculadora de riesgo de reingreso desarrollada para el uso postoperatorio puede identificar a los pacientes de alto riesgo para una posible mejora de los factores de riesgo modificables, un seguimiento ambulatorio más intensivo o un reingreso planificado. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B284. (Traducción-Dr Yesenia Rojas-Khalil).

Understanding the Surgical Experience for African-Americans and Caucasians With Enhanced Recovery

INTRODUCTION

Racial/ethnic disparities in surgical outcomes exist. Enhanced recovery programs (ERPs) have reduced some racial/ethnic disparities, but it remains unclear if disparities in experiences are also reduced. The purpose of this study was to use qualitative methods to better understand the surgical experience for African-American and Caucasian patients in the setting of an ERP.

METHODS

Using purposeful sampling at a minority-serving institution, we recruited African-American and Caucasian patients who had undergone colorectal surgery under an ERP to six focus groups. Participants identified barriers and facilitators to a positive, or negative, surgical experience. Audio recordings were transcribed and analyzed using an indicative thematic approach with NVivo 10 software (QSR International).

RESULTS

Forty-three patients (15 African-Americans and 28 Caucasians) participated in six focus groups. Six themes were identified by patients to be important in surgery: 1) knowledge about colorectal surgery, 2) obtaining information, 3) quality of information, 4) setting expectations about surgery, 5) following preoperative and postoperative instructions, and 6) confidence in surgery outcomes. For both racial/ethnic groups, patients felt that more information could have been provided, information should be given at their level of understanding, and trust in the physician made them feel confident in a positive outcome. African-American patients described experiences of having incorrect or no expectations on surgical outcomes, being provided inconsistent information, and feeling misled. African-Americans also described following instructions from family members and valued the importance of diet and exercise in recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

African-American and Caucasian surgical patients have varied surgical experiences even under an ERP. All patients, however, valued the ability to obtain, process, and understand health information during the surgical process. These elements define "health literacy" and suggest the importance of providing health literacy-sensitive care in surgery.

Delving deeper into disparity: The impact of health literacy on the surgical care of breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Breast surgical oncology is a unique field that involves complex cancer management and longstanding patient interactions with the healthcare system, making it potentially challenging for patients with low health literacy. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current knowledge regarding health literacy in breast cancer and identify future directions for research and potential intervention in breast surgical oncology.

DATA SOURCES

A search of relevant literature querying PubMed and Science Direct was performed and included the following keywords: health literacy, breast cancer, breast surgical oncology, surgery, outcomes, prevention, screening, healthcare utilization, chronic disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited health literacy may detrimentally affect understanding and outcomes in breast surgical oncology. Identifying ways providers can improve patient understanding and utilization of health information is important, and surgeons may have a pivotal role. Further studies addressing health literacy in breast surgical oncology is needed in order to better optimize care of patients.

Effects of Estimated Community-Level Health Literacy on Treatment Initiation and Preventive Care Among Older Adults with Newly Diagnosed Diabetes

PURPOSE

Individual measures of health literacy are not feasible for administration on a large scale, yet estimates of community-level health literacy in the US recently became available. We sought to investigate whether community-level health literacy estimates are associated with the initiation of oral antihyperglycemic agents (OHA) and the use of standard preventive care services among older adults with newly diagnosed diabetes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 169,758 patients, ≥65 years old with hypertension and newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes using 2007-2011 data from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services Chronic Conditions Warehouse. We examined the relationship between community-level health literacy estimates and initiation of OHA, receipt of flu shots, eye exams, Hemoglobin A1c tests, and lipid tests within 12 months post diabetes diagnosis.

RESULTS

Patients living in communities with above basic health literacy (vs. basic/below basic) were 15% more likely to initiate OHA (Hazard Ratio=1.15; 95% CI 1.12 to 1.18). After classifying the health literacy distribution as quintiles, the analysis revealed a dose-response relationship with OHA initiation that plateaued at the third and fourth quintiles and declined at the fifth quintile. Individuals residing in communities with higher health literacy were more likely to participate in preventive care services (relative risk ranged from 1.09 for lipid test [95% CI 1.07-1.11] to 1.43 for flu shot [95% CI 1.41-1.46]).

CONCLUSION

Community-level health literacy estimates were associated with the initiation of OHA and uptake of standard preventive care services in older adults. Community-level health literacy may help to inform targeted diabetes education and support efforts.

Health-related quality of life and readmission of patients with cardiovascular disease in South Korea

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to investigate the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients with cardiovascular disease and its relationship to hospital readmission.

METHODS

The cross-sectional study used data from 1037 adults aged ⩾19 years diagnosed with myocardial infarction or angina pectoris. Raw data were obtained from the fourth to sixth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2007-2014).

RESULTS

Readmission was found to be associated with age, living status, education level, unemployment, individual income level, stroke, osteoarthritis, diabetes, depression, low stress level, walking days per week, and activity limitations due to cardiovascular disease.

CONCLUSION

In summary, readmission was related to HRQOL among patients with myocardial infarction. Interventions that consider efforts to reduce readmission through improved diagnosis and development of systematic management of cardiovascular disease symptoms are required.

Health literacy is independently and inversely associated with carotid artery plaques and cardiovascular risk

Aims

Health literacy, the degree to which individuals understand and act upon health information, may have a pivotal role in the prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD), with low health literacy potentially explaining poorer adherence to prevention guidelines. We investigated the associations between health literacy, ultrasound-detected carotid atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk factors.

Methods

Baseline data (cross-sectional analysis) from a randomized controlled trial, integrated within the Västerbotten Intervention Program, Northern Sweden, was used. We included 3459 individuals, aged 40 or 50 years with ≥1 conventional risk factor or aged 60 years old. The participants underwent clinical examination, blood sampling, carotid ultrasound assessment of intima-media wall thickness (CIMT) and plaque formation, and answered a questionnaire on health literacy – the Brief Health Literacy Screen. The European Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation and Framingham Risk Score were calculated.

Results

About 20% of the participants had low health literacy. Low health literacy was independently associated with the presence of ultrasound-detected carotid artery plaques after adjustment for age and education, odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 1.54 (1.28–1.85), demonstrating a similar level of risk as for smoking. Health literacy was associated with CIMT in men. Low health literacy was associated with higher CVD risk scores. Sensitivity analyses with low health literacy set to 9% or 30% of the study sample, respectively, yielded essentially the same results.

Conclusions

Low health literacy was independently associated with carotid artery plaques and a high level of CVD risk scores. Presenting health information in a fashion that is understood by all patients may improve preventive efforts.

Health Literacy in the Inpatient Setting: Implications for Patient Care and Patient Safety

Health literacy plays a role in the events leading up to children's hospitalizations, during hospital admission, and after discharge. Hospitals and providers should use a universal precautions approach and routinely incorporate health-literacy-informed strategies in communicating with all patients and families to ensure that they can understand health information, follow medical instructions, participate actively in their own/their child's care, and successfully navigate the health care system. Interventions that incorporate health-literacy-informed strategies and that target patients/families and health care systems should be implemented to improve patient outcomes and patient-centered and family-centered care.

Effectiveness of health literacy intervention on cardiovascular diseases among university students of Pakistan

Background

Global burden of cardiovascular diseases is alarming which is intricately linked with health literacy. To what extent improvement in health literacy can lower down cardiovascular diseases occurrence has not yet properly documented. This study focused on assessing the knowledge and existing lifestyle behavior about cardiac diseases among university students. We further aimed to improve this awareness after imparting an educational intervention among undergraduate non-medical students to sensitize them about risk factors.

Method

A pre and post approaches with cross sectional study design was conducted in University of Gujrat during April–September 2017. Using structured questionnaire comprising of response items about hypertension, heart attack, stroke and preventive practices, data was randomly collected from students (n = 100). Survey respondents were also given a lecture regarding cardiovascular diseases awareness and a post test evaluation was also conducted on same group of students.

Results

With response rate of 86.95%, mean age of participating students was 21.2 (SD ± 1.34) years. Female students comprised of 53% out of which 57% were from rural background. Assessment of cardiovascular disease knowledge revealed maximum mean pre test score 30.53 (SD ± 7.61) and for post test 40.65 (SD ± 4.34) (p < 0.00). Mean score for using preventive practices was 13.02 (SD ± 2.97) for pre test whereas for post test it was 14.09 (SD ± 2.90) (p < 0.00). Intervention impact was significant on hypertension related complications (p < 0.000), symptoms of heart attack (p < 0.000), symptoms of stroke (p < 0.000) and preventive practices (p < 0.00).

Conclusion

Findings presented here show a fair degree of awareness among university students about study title prior to any educational intervention. However, by attending educational session, a significant increase in the positive lifestyle behavior and knowledge was noticed. We conclude that health promotion activities in educational institutes to sensitize students can bring rational changes in Pakistani society to promote healthy behavior and minimize cardiovascular disease risks.

Organizational Health Literacy: Review of Theories, Frameworks, Guides, and Implementation Issues

Organizational health literacy is described as an organization-wide effort to transform organization and delivery of care and services to make it easier for people to navigate, understand, and use information and services to take care of their health. Several health literacy guides have been developed to assist healthcare organizations with this effort, but their content has not been systematically reviewed to understand the scope and practical implications of this transformation. The objective of this study was to review (1) theories and frameworks that inform the concept of organizational health literacy, (2) the attributes of organizational health literacy as described in the guides, (3) the evidence for the effectiveness of the guides, and (4) the barriers and facilitators to implementing organizational health literacy. Drawing on a metanarrative review method, 48 publications were reviewed, of which 15 dealt with the theories and operational frameworks, 20 presented health literacy guides, and 13 addressed guided implementation of organizational health literacy. Seven theories and 9 operational frameworks have been identified. Six health literacy dimensions and 9 quality-improvement characteristics were reviewed for each health literacy guide. Evidence about the effectiveness of health literacy guides is limited at this time, but experiences with the guides were positive. Thirteen key barriers (conceived also as facilitators) were identified. Further development of organizational health literacy requires a strong and a clear connection between its vision and operationalization as an implementation strategy to patient-centered care. For many organizations, becoming health literate will require multiple, simultaneous, and radical changes. Organizational health literacy has to make sense from clinical and financial perspectives in order for organizations to embark on such transformative journey.

Measurement of health literacy in patients with cardiovascular diseases: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

While many instruments have been developed, validated, and used to assess health literacy skills, their use and appropriateness among patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are not widely studied.

OBJECTIVE

To identify, appraise, and synthesize available health literacy assessment instruments used in patients with CVDs.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched for studies that used validated measures to assess health literacy in patients with CVDs. Included studies were assessed for risk of bias and the identified instruments were evaluated based on their psychometric properties. Data were synthesized using a narrative approach.

RESULTS

Forty-three studies were included in the review, of which 20 were cross-sectional studies and 12 were randomized controlled trials. Eleven health literacy assessment instruments were identified, of which only one was disease-specific. The Abbreviated version of the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (S-TOFHLA) (n = 19) and the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM) (n = 13) were found to be the most commonly used instruments to assess health literacy in CVDs.

CONCLUSIONS

The S-TOFHLA and the REALM are the most widely used instruments to evaluate health literacy in CVD population. More CVD-specific health literacy screening instruments are warranted. Assessment of health literacy should be a standard of care in patients with CVDs and effective interventions should be developed to improve the impact of limited health literacy on health outcomes in this population.