1
|
Brodén C, Sandberg O, Olivecrona H, Emery R, Sköldenberg O. Precision of CT-based micromotion analysis is comparable to radiostereometry for early migration measurements in cemented acetabular cups. Acta Orthop 2021; 92:419-423. [PMID: 33821746 PMCID: PMC8381926 DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1906082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose - CT (computed tomography) based methods have lately been considered an alternative to radiostereometry (RSA) for assessing early implant migration. However, no study has directly compared the 2 methods in a clinical setting. We estimated the precision and effective radiation dose of a CT-based method and compared it with marker-based RSA in 10 patients with hip arthroplasty.Patients and methods - We included 10 patients who underwent total hip replacement with a cemented cup. CT and RSA double examinations were performed postoperatively, and precision and effective dose data were compared. The CT data was analyzed with CT micromotion analysis (CTMA) software both with and without the use of bone markers. The RSA images were analyzed with RSA software with the use of bone markers.Results - The precision of CTMA with bone markers was 0.10-0.16 mm in translation and 0.31°-0.37° in rotation. Without bone markers, the precision of CTMA was 0.10-0.16 mm in translation and 0.21°-0.31° in rotation. In comparison, the precision of RSA was 0.09-0.26 mm and 0.43°-1.69°. The mean CTMA and RSA effective dose was estimated at 0.2 mSv and 0.04 mSv, respectively.Interpretation - CTMA, with and without the use of bone markers, had a comparable precision to RSA. CT radiation doses were slightly higher than RSA doses but still at a considerably low effective dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cyrus Brodén
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary’s Hospital, London, UK
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Danderyd Hospital, Division of Orthopaedics, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Henrik Olivecrona
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Roger Emery
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary’s Hospital, London, UK
| | - Olof Sköldenberg
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Danderyd Hospital, Division of Orthopaedics, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wyatt MC, Roberton A, Foxall-Smi M, Beswick AD, Kunutsor SK, Whitehouse MR. Does vitamin E highly-crosslinked polyethylene convey an advantage in primary total hip replacement? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hip Int 2020; 30:598-608. [PMID: 31213083 DOI: 10.1177/1120700019858335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vitamin E highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) was developed to reduce wear in total hip replacement (THR). This formal systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to provide independent synthesis of wear characteristics of Vitamin E treated HXLPE compared to HXPLE/UHMWPE. Secondary outcome measures were differences in revision rates and functional scores. METHODS We performed a formal systematic review as per PRISMA guidelines; literature searches were conducted on 14 November 2017 (MEDLINE, Embase on Ovid, and the Cochrane Library). We included randomised controlled trials, analyses of joint registries, and case-controlled studies of primary THR comparing cups with a vitamin E HXLPE bearing with bearing surfaces made from other types of polyethylene. Initial screening was performed by 2 independent assessors; disagreement resolved in discussion with a third reviewer. Studies were evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Data extraction permitted meta-analysis. RESULTS 372 studies were identified on initial screening, 5 studies met the eligibility criteria. There was no significant heterogeneity between studies. There was variable risk of bias. At a mean of 35 (range 20-60) months, Vitamin E HXLPE had significant advantages over highly cross-linked polyethylene with regards total femoral head penetration (p = 0.004). Given the RSA measurement errors this may not be clinically significant.There were neither significant differences in revision rates nor Harris Hip Scores (p = 0.06). CONCLUSION At a minimum of 3 years follow-up there was reduced total femoral head penetration for vitamin E HXLPE over HXLPE. This bearing surface does not, as yet, have clinically significant advantages in terms of revision rates or patient function over HXLPE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael C Wyatt
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.,National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol
| | - Andrew Roberton
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.,National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol
| | - Michael Foxall-Smi
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.,National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol
| | - Andrew D Beswick
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.,National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol
| | - Setor K Kunutsor
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.,National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol
| | - Michael R Whitehouse
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.,National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brodén C, Sandberg O, Sköldenberg O, Stigbrand H, Hänni M, Giles JW, Emery R, Lazarinis S, Nyström A, Olivecrona H. Low-dose CT-based implant motion analysis is a precise tool for early migration measurements of hip cups: a clinical study of 24 patients. Acta Orthop 2020; 91:260-265. [PMID: 32056507 PMCID: PMC8023951 DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1725345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose - Early implant migration is known to be a predictive factor of clinical loosening in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is the gold standard used to measure early migration in patients. However, RSA requires costly, specialized imaging equipment and the image process is complex. We determined the precision of an alternative, commercially available, CT method in 3 ongoing clinical THA studies, comprising 3 different cups.Materials and methods - 24 CT double examinations of 24 hip cups were selected consecutively from 3 ongoing prospective studies: 2 primary THA (1 cemented and 1 uncemented) and 1 THA (cemented) revision study. Precision of the CT-based implant motion analysis (CTMA) system was calculated separately for each study, using both the surface anatomy of the pelvis and metal beads placed in the pelvis.Results - For the CTMA analysis using the surface anatomy of the pelvis, the precision ranged between 0.07 and 0.31 mm in translation and 0.20° and 0.39° for rotation, respectively. For the CTMA analysis using beads the precision ranged between 0.08 and 0.20 mm in translation and between 0.20° and 0.43° for rotations. The radiation dose ranged between 0.2 and 2.3 mSv.Interpretation - CTMA achieved a clinically relevant and consistent precision between the 3 different hip cups studied. The use of different hip cup types, different CT scanners, or registration method (beads or surface anatomy) had no discernible effect on precision. Therefore, CTMA without the use of bone markers could potentially be an alternative to RSA to measure early migration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cyrus Brodén
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; ,Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; ,Correspondence:
| | | | - Olof Sköldenberg
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden;
| | - Hampus Stigbrand
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Länssjukhuset, Gävle, Sweden; Center for Research and Development, Uppsala University/County Council of Gävleborg, Sweden;
| | - Mari Hänni
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Radiology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden;
| | - Joshua W Giles
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada;
| | - Roger Emery
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St Mary’s Hospital, London, UK;
| | - Stergios Lazarinis
- Department of Orthopedics, Institute of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden;
| | - Andreas Nyström
- Department of Orthopedics, Institute of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden;
| | - Henrik Olivecrona
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sköldenberg OG, Rysinska AD, Chammout G, Salemyr M, Mukka SS, Bodén H, Eisler T. A randomized double-blind noninferiority trial, evaluating migration of a cemented vitamin E-stabilized highly crosslinked component compared with a standard polyethylene component in reverse hybrid total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2019; 101-B:1192-1198. [PMID: 31564144 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.101b10.bjj-2019-0456.r2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) studies of vitamin E-doped, highly crosslinked polyethylene (VEPE) liners show low head penetration rates in cementless acetabular components. There is, however, currently no data on cemented VEPE acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of a new cemented VEPE component, compared with a conventional polyethylene (PE) component regarding migration, head penetration, and clinical results. PATIENTS AND METHODS We enrolled 42 patients (21 male, 21 female) with osteoarthritis and a mean age of 67 years (sd 5), in a double-blinded, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial. The subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a reverse hybrid THA with a cemented component of either argon-gas gamma-sterilized PE component (controls) or VEPE, with identical geometry. The primary endpoint was proximal implant migration of the component at two years postoperatively measured with RSA. Secondary endpoints included total migration of the component, penetration of the femoral head into the component, and patient-reported outcome measurements. RESULTS In total, 19 control implants and 18 implants in the VEPE group were analyzed for the primary endpoint. We found a continuous proximal migration of the component in the VEPE group that was significantly higher with a difference at two years of a mean 0.21 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05 to 0.37; p = 0.013). The total migration was also significantly higher in the VEPE group, but femoral head penetration was lower. We found no difference in clinical outcomes between the groups. CONCLUSION At two years, this cemented VEPE component, although having a low head penetration and excellent clinical results, failed to meet noninferiority compared with the conventional implant by a proximal migration above the proposed safety threshold of RSA. The early proximal migration pattern of the VEPE component is a reason for continued monitoring, although a specific threshold for proximal migration and risk for later failure cannot be defined and needs further study. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1192-1198.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olof G Sköldenberg
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Division of Orthopaedics, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Agata D Rysinska
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Division of Orthopaedics, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ghaz Chammout
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Division of Orthopaedics, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mats Salemyr
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Division of Orthopaedics, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sebastian S Mukka
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Henrik Bodén
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Division of Orthopaedics, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Thomas Eisler
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Division of Orthopaedics, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Persson A, Eisler T, Bodén H, Krupic F, Sköldenberg O, Muren O. Revision for Symptomatic Pseudotumor After Primary Metal-on-Polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Standard Femoral Stem. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2018; 100:942-949. [PMID: 29870445 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.17.00616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pseudotumor formation following total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a well-known complication mainly associated with metal-on-metal (MoM) bearings and taper corrosion on modular-neck femoral stems. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of revision surgery for symptomatic pseudotumors in a large cohort of patients treated with primary THA with a standard stem and a non-MoM articulation. METHODS We included 2,102 patients treated with a total of 2,446 THAs from 1999 until May 2016 in a prospective, observational cohort study. All patients underwent THA with the same uncemented, non-modular-neck femoral stem and metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) (n = 2,409) or ceramic-on-polyethylene (n = 37) articulation. All patients were followed by means of a combination of surgical and medical chart review, follow-up visits, and the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Metal artifact reduction sequence magnetic resonance imaging (MARS MRI) was used for diagnosis of the pseudotumors, and serum metal ion levels and inflammatory marker levels were measured for all patients who underwent a revision due to pseudotumor. RESULTS The prevalence of revision for symptomatic pseudotumor formation was 0.5% (13 cases) at a mean follow-up time of 7 years. The incidence rate was 0.9 case per 1,000 person-years. All 13 revisions were done in patients with an MoP articulation. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated a 0.5% prevalence of revision due to symptomatic pseudotumor formation in a cohort of patients who underwent THA with a non-MoM construct. Surgeons should be aware that symptomatic pseudotumor formation requiring revision surgery is a tangible complication even after standard MoP THA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anders Persson
- Department of Orthopaedics, Danderyd University Hospital, Karolinska Institute at Danderyd University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Thomas Eisler
- Department of Orthopaedics, Danderyd University Hospital, Karolinska Institute at Danderyd University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Henrik Bodén
- Department of Orthopaedics, Danderyd University Hospital, Karolinska Institute at Danderyd University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ferid Krupic
- Department of Orthopaedics and Radiology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Olof Sköldenberg
- Department of Orthopaedics, Danderyd University Hospital, Karolinska Institute at Danderyd University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Olav Muren
- Department of Orthopaedics, Danderyd University Hospital, Karolinska Institute at Danderyd University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chammout G, Muren O, Bodén H, Salemyr M, Sköldenberg O. Cemented compared to uncemented femoral stems in total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: study protocol for a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial (CHANCE-trial). BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2016; 17:398. [PMID: 27646142 PMCID: PMC5028918 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-016-1253-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2015] [Accepted: 09/13/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Total hip replacement (THR) is the preferred method for the active and lucid elderly patient with a displaced femoral neck fracture (FNF). But controversy still exists regarding using cemented or uncemented stem in these patients. The aim of this study is to compare a cemented and uncemented femoral stem in patients 65–79 years treated surgically with THR for displaced FNF. Methods/design In a single-centre, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial, we will include 140 patients aged 65-79 years with an acute displaced FNF and randomize them in a 1:1 ratio to a cemented tapered or a uncemented tapered hydroxyapatite - coated femoral stem. A cemented cup will be used in both groups. The patients will be blinded for allocation. The primary endpoints will be the incidence of all hip-related complications and health-related quality of life evaluated with EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) index up to 2 years after surgery. Secondary outcomes will be overall mortality, general medical complications and hip function. The follow-up will be at 3 months, 1 and 2 years. Further follow-ups after end of study will be at 4 and 10 years. Results will be analysed using 95 % CI’s for the effect size. A regression model will also be used to adjust for stratification factor. Discussion The ethical committee at Karolinska Institutet has approved the study. An interim analysis on the primary endpoints will be performed when half the sample size is included. The results from the study will be disseminated to the medical community via presentations and publications in relevant medical journals. The study will provide evidence if a cemented or uncemented femoral stem is preferable in THR for elderly patients with a displaced FNF. Trial registration The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02247791), October 21, 2013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ghazi Chammout
- Karolinska Institute, Department of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd hospital, Stockholm, S-182 88, Sweden
| | - Olle Muren
- Karolinska Institute, Department of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd hospital, Stockholm, S-182 88, Sweden
| | - Henrik Bodén
- Karolinska Institute, Department of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd hospital, Stockholm, S-182 88, Sweden
| | - Mats Salemyr
- Karolinska Institute, Department of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd hospital, Stockholm, S-182 88, Sweden
| | - Olof Sköldenberg
- Karolinska Institute, Department of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd hospital, Stockholm, S-182 88, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|