1
|
Benmassaoud A, Martel M, Carli F, Geraci O, Daskalopoulou SS, Sebastiani G, Bessissow A. Prehabilitation in patients awaiting liver transplantation. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2024; 38:100835. [PMID: 38367398 DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2024.100835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Frailty, malnutrition and sarcopenia lead to a significant increase in morbidity and mortality before and after liver transplantation (LT). Prehabilitation attempts to optimize physical fitness of individuals before major surgeries. To date, little is known about its impact on patients awaiting LT. AIMS The aim of our scoping review was to describe whether prehabilitation in patients awaiting LT is feasible and safe, and whether it leads to a change in clinical parameters before or after transplantation. METHODS We performed a systematic review of the literature from 1946 to November 2023 to identify prospective studies and randomized controlled trials of adult LT candidates who participated in an exercise training program. RESULTS Out of 3262 citations initially identified, six studies were included. Studies were heterogeneous in design, patient selection, intervention, duration, and outcomes assessed. All studies were self-described as pilot or feasibility studies and had a sample size ranging from 13 to 33. Two studies were randomized controlled trials. Two study restricted to patients with cirrhosis who were eligible for liver transplantation or on the transplant list. Exercise programs lasted between 6 and 12 weeks. In terms of feasibility, proportion of eligible patients that were recruited was between 54 and 100%. Program completion ranged between 38 and 90%. Interventions appeared safe with 9 (9.2%) adverse events noted. In the intervention group, improvements were generally noted in peak oxygen consumption and workload, 6-min walking distance, and muscle strength. One study suggested a decrease in post-transplant hospital length of stay. CONCLUSIONS Overall, it appears that prehabilitation with exercise training is feasible, and safe in patients awaiting LT. Higher quality and larger studies are needed to confirm its impact on pre- and post-transplantation-related outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amine Benmassaoud
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada; Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
| | - Myriam Martel
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Franco Carli
- Department of Anesthesia, McGill University Health Centre
| | - Olivia Geraci
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Stella S Daskalopoulou
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada; Division of General Internal Medicine, McGill University Health Centre
| | - Giada Sebastiani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada; Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Amal Bessissow
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada; Division of General Internal Medicine, McGill University Health Centre
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ma X, Zhang Z, Yao B, Peng M, Jiang H, You Y. Study on the effect of pre-rehabilitation home-based on patients undergoing kidney transplantation with end-stage renal disease: A study protocol. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e28280. [PMID: 34967359 PMCID: PMC8718243 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000028280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Evaluate the feasibility of ERAS-based home exercise pre-rehabilitation in patients awaiting kidney transplantation. METHODOLOGY The proposed feasibility trial will be a single-arm, single-center study. A total of 47 ESRD patients awaiting kidney transplantation will be selected as subjects to undergo personalized family exercise pre-rehabilitation, including aerobic exercise, functional resistance exercise, and flexibility training. Briefly, a 6-minute walking test (6MWT), 4-meter gait speed, grip strength, and sit-to-stand test will be used as the main outcome indicators. The effect of family exercise pre-rehabilitation on the optimization of body function in ESRD patients undergoing kidney transplantation will be assessed. The days of hospitalization after kidney transplantation, postoperative complications, health survey (the Short Form Health Survey, SF-36), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) will be used as secondary outcome indicators to evaluate the improvement of quality of life, psychological function, and postoperative rehabilitation of patients after kidney transplantation. These indexes will be collected before and after intervention (baseline and before kidney transplantation), before discharge (after kidney transplantation), and 1 month after discharge. CONCLUSION This study will evaluate the effect of ERAS-based home exercise pre-rehabilitation on patients awaiting kidney transplantation, and possibly determine an application protocol for this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2000037846. Registered on September 2, 2020.
Collapse
|
3
|
Frailty as a predictive factor for survival after liver transplantation, especially for patients with MELD≤15-a prospective study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2021; 406:1963-1969. [PMID: 33847783 PMCID: PMC8481213 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-021-02109-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Frailty has been discussed as a predictor of morbidity and mortality for liver cirrhosis. The aim of our study is to evaluate the role of frailty in liver transplantation, particularly for patients with MELD scores < 15. Methods All patients listed for liver transplantation between September 2015 and November 2018 were prospectively included in the study. Frailty was assessed by Fried’s frailty classification. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative data were prospectively recorded. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed. The ethical approval of the institutional board review was obtained for the study. Results There were 114 patients included in the study, and their median MELD score was 16. Of these, 86 patients were defined as frail (75.4%). A total of 62 patients (54.4%) underwent liver transplantation, 11 (17.7%) died postoperatively, and 24 patients (21.0%) died while on the waitlist. All postoperative mortality cases were frail, and only 3 patients (12.5%) were non-frail in the waitlist mortality group. There were 14 patients who had MELD scores of <15 (58.3%). The overall survival of non-frail patients was significantly better than that of frail patients. The multivariate regression analyses identified frailty criteria, including unintended weight loss and low hand grip strength, and platelet count and being married or living in a solid partnership were prognostic factors for survival in all patients. Conclusion The addition of frailty assessment can be beneficial for predicting mortality after liver transplantation, especially in patients with low MELD score. Frail patients on the waitlist have significant risk for mortality even with low MELD score.
Collapse
|
4
|
Freer A, Williams F, Durman S, Hayden J, Trivedi PJ, Armstrong MJ. Home-based exercise in patients with refractory fatigue associated with primary biliary cholangitis: a protocol for the EXerCise Intervention in cholesTatic LivEr Disease (EXCITED) feasibility trial. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 2021; 8:bmjgast-2020-000579. [PMID: 33707216 PMCID: PMC7957137 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2020-000579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Revised: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Fatigue is the most commonly reported symptom of the liver disease primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). It affects 40%-80% of patients, has no effective treatment and is associated with heightened mortality risk. The pathogenesis is unknown, but muscle bioenergetic abnormalities have been proposed to contribute. Directly observed exercise has been shown to attenuate symptoms in small groups; however, due to the rare nature of the disease, home-based interventions need to be evaluated for feasibility, safety and efficacy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a phase 1/pilot, single-arm, open-label clinical trial evaluating a novel home-based exercise programme in patients with PBC with severe fatigue. Forty patients with moderate-severe fatigue (PBC40 fatigue domain score >33; other causes of fatigue excluded) will be selected using a convenience sampling method. A 12-week home-based exercise programme, consisting of individualised resistance, aerobic exercises and telephone health calls (first 6 weeks only), will be delivered. Measures of fatigue (PBC40 fatigue domain; fatigue impact scale), quality of life, sleep (Epworth Sleep Score), physical activity, anxiety and depression, aerobic exercise capacity (incremental shuttle walk test; Duke Activity Status Index) and functional capacity (short physical performance battery) will be assessed at baseline and at 6 and 12 weeks following the intervention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The protocol is approved by the National Research Ethics Service Committee London (IRAS 253115). Recruitment commenced in April 2019 and ended in March 2020. Participant follow-up is due to finish by December 2020. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication, conference presentation and social media. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04265235.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Freer
- NIHR Birmingham BRC and Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Felicity Williams
- NIHR Birmingham BRC and Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Institute of Immunology and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Simon Durman
- Department of Physiotherapy, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jennifer Hayden
- Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Palak J Trivedi
- NIHR Birmingham BRC and Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK .,Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.,Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Matthew J Armstrong
- Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Allen SL, Quinlan JI, Dhaliwal A, Armstrong MJ, Elsharkawy AM, Greig CA, Lord JM, Lavery GG, Breen L. Sarcopenia in chronic liver disease: mechanisms and countermeasures. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2021; 320:G241-G257. [PMID: 33236953 PMCID: PMC8609568 DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00373.2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Sarcopenia, a condition of low muscle mass, quality, and strength, is commonly found in patients with cirrhosis and is associated with adverse clinical outcomes including reduction in quality of life, increased mortality, and posttransplant complications. In chronic liver disease (CLD), sarcopenia is most commonly defined through the measurement of the skeletal muscle index of the third lumbar spine. A major contributor to sarcopenia in CLD is the imbalance in muscle protein turnover, which likely occurs due to a decrease in muscle protein synthesis and an elevation in muscle protein breakdown. This imbalance is assumed to arise due to several factors including accelerated starvation, hyperammonemia, amino acid deprivation, chronic inflammation, excessive alcohol intake, and physical inactivity. In particular, hyperammonemia is a key mediator of the liver-gut axis and is known to contribute to mitochondrial dysfunction and an increase in myostatin expression. Currently, the use of nutritional interventions such as late-evening snacks, branched-chain amino acid supplementation, and physical activity have been proposed to help the management and treatment of sarcopenia. However, little evidence exists to comprehensively support their use in clinical settings. Several new pharmacological strategies, including myostatin inhibition and the nutraceutical Urolithin A, have recently been proposed to treat age-related sarcopenia and may also be of use in CLD. This review highlights the potential molecular mechanisms contributing to sarcopenia in CLD alongside a discussion of existing and potential new treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie L. Allen
- 1School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom,2National Institute for Health Research, Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan I. Quinlan
- 1School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom,2National Institute for Health Research, Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Amritpal Dhaliwal
- 2National Institute for Health Research, Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom,3Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom,4Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew J. Armstrong
- 2National Institute for Health Research, Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom,4Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Ahmed M. Elsharkawy
- 2National Institute for Health Research, Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom,3Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom,4Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Carolyn A. Greig
- 1School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom,2National Institute for Health Research, Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom,5MRC-Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Janet M. Lord
- 2National Institute for Health Research, Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom,3Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom,5MRC-Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Gareth G. Lavery
- 2National Institute for Health Research, Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom,6Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom,7Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partner, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Leigh Breen
- 1School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom,2National Institute for Health Research, Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom,5MRC-Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Millson C, Considine A, Cramp ME, Holt A, Hubscher S, Hutchinson J, Jones K, Leithead J, Masson S, Menon K, Mirza D, Neuberger J, Prasad R, Pratt A, Prentice W, Shepherd L, Simpson K, Thorburn D, Westbrook R, Tripathi D. Adult liver transplantation: A UK clinical guideline - part 1: pre-operation. Frontline Gastroenterol 2020; 11:375-384. [PMID: 32879721 PMCID: PMC7447286 DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2019-101215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2019] [Revised: 10/07/2019] [Accepted: 10/09/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Liver transplantation is a highly successful treatment for all types of liver failure, some non-liver failure indications and liver cancer. Most referrals come from secondary care. This first part of a two-part guideline outlines who to refer, and how that referral should be made, including patient details and additional issues such as those relevant to alcohol and drug misuse. The process of liver transplant assessment involves the confirmation of the diagnosis and non-reversibility, an evaluation of comorbidities and exclusion of contraindications. Finally, those making it onto the waiting list require monitoring and optimising. Underpinning this process is a need for good communication between patient, their carers, secondary care and the liver transplant service, synchronised by the transplant coordinator. Managing expectation and balancing the uncertainty of organ availability against the inevitable progression of underlying liver disease requires sensitivity and honesty from all healthcare providers and the assessment of palliative care needs is an integral part of this process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles Millson
- Department of Hepatology, York Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK
| | - Aisling Considine
- Pharmacy department, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Matthew E Cramp
- South West Liver Unit, Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - Andrew Holt
- Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Stefan Hubscher
- Department of Cellular Pathology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - John Hutchinson
- Department of Hepatology, York Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK
| | - Kate Jones
- Liver Transplantation Service, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Joanna Leithead
- Department of Hepatology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Steven Masson
- Liver Unit, The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Krish Menon
- Liver Transplantation & HPB Surgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Darius Mirza
- Liver Transplantation & HPB surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - James Neuberger
- Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Raj Prasad
- Liver Transplantation & HPB Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Anthony Pratt
- Pharmacy department, York Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK
| | - Wendy Prentice
- Palliative Care Medicine, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Liz Shepherd
- Liver Transplantation Service, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ken Simpson
- Scottish Liver Transplant Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Doug Thorburn
- Department of Hepatology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Rachel Westbrook
- Department of Hepatology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Dhiraj Tripathi
- Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birminghams, UK
| |
Collapse
|