Adverse events following immunisation with four-component meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (4CMenB): interaction with co-administration of routine infant vaccines and risk of recurrence in European randomised controlled trials

Available evidence on the co-administration of the four-component meningococcal B vaccine (4CMenB) with three vaccines at the same visit among pediatric individuals

Vaccine co-administration is a useful strategy for improving vaccine coverage and adherence. In Italy, an update to the national immunization program (NIP) in 2023 included recommendations for co-administration of pediatric vaccines, including the four-component vaccine for meningococcus B (4CMenB), pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV), hexavalent vaccines, and oral rotavirus vaccines. Safety is a major concern when considering vaccine co-administration; therefore, a literature review of the available evidence on 4CMenB co-administration with PCV, hexavalent/pentavalent, and rotavirus vaccines was performed. Of 763 publications screened, two studies were reviewed that reported safety data on 4CMenB co-administration with PCV, hexavalent/pentavalent, and rotavirus vaccines in infants aged 0-24 months. Overall, these studies supported that there were no significant safety signals when co-administering 4CMenB with PCV, hexavalent/pentavalent, and rotavirus vaccines, compared with individual vaccination. This review provides key insights for healthcare professionals on the tolerability of co-administering 4CMenB with routine vaccines.

Serious bacterial infection risk in recently immunized febrile infants in the emergency department

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Fever following immunizations is a common presenting chiefcomplaint among infants. The 2021 American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) febrile infant clinical practice guidelines exclude recently immunized (RI) infants. This is a challenge for clinicians in the management of the febrile RI young infant. The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of SBI in RI febrile young infants between 6 and 12 weeks of age.

METHODS

This was a retrospective chart review of infants 6-12 weeks who presented with a fever ≥38 °C to two U.S. military academic Emergency Departments over a four-year period. Infants were considered recently immunized (RI) if they had received immunizations in the preceding 72 h prior to evaluation and not recently immunized (NRI) if they had not received immunizations during this time period. The primary outcome was prevalence of serious bacterial infection (SBI) further delineated into invasive-bacterial infection (IBI) and non-invasive bacterial infection (non-IBI) based on culture and/or radiograph reports.

RESULTS

Of the 508 febrile infants identified, 114 had received recent immunizations in the preceding 72 h. The overall prevalence of SBI was 11.4% (95% CI = 8.9-14.6) in our study population. The prevalence of SBI in NRI infants was 13.7% (95% CI = 10.6-17.6) compared to 3.5% (95% CI = 1.1-9.3) in RI infants. The relative risk of SBI in the setting of recent immunizations was 0.3 (95% CI = 0.1-0.7). There were no cases of invasive-bacterial infections (IBI) in the RI group with all but one of the SBI being urinary tract infections (UTI). The single non-UTI was a case of pneumonia in an infant who presented with respiratory symptoms within 24 h of immunizations.

CONCLUSION

The risk of IBI (meningitis or bacteremia) in RI infants aged 6 to 12 weeks is low. Non-IBI within the first 24 h following immunization was significantly lower than in febrile NRI infants. UTIs remain a risk in the RI population and investigation with urinalysis and urine culture should be encouraged. Shared decision making with families guide a less invasive approach to the care of these children. Future research utilizing a large prospective multi-center data registry would aid in further defining the risk of both IBI and non-IBI among RI infants.

Public Health Impact and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of 4-Component Meningococcal Serotype B Vaccination for Infants in France

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In France, meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) is the most common serogroup causing invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) in infants and young children. Our objective was to illustrate the impact of model choices on health outcomes and the cost-effectiveness of infant vaccination with the multicomponent meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (4CMenB) versus no vaccine in France.

METHODS

A previously published dynamic transmission-based cost-effectiveness model was adapted for the French context using updated, French-specific demographic, epidemiological, and cost data. IMD incidence and long-term sequelae were derived through analysis of French healthcare and surveillance databases. A collective perspective over a 100-year time horizon was adopted, with a discount rate of 2.5%, reduced to 1.5% after the first 30 years. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed.

RESULTS

In the base case analysis, infant vaccination with 4CMenB avoided 3101 MenB IMD cases in infants aged < 1 year (- 54%) and 6845 cases in all age groups (- 21%). The estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was €316,272/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) but was highly sensitive to the types of sequelae included, MenB incidence, vaccine effectiveness parameters, and consideration of life-expectancy in IMD survivors (range: €65,272/QALY to €493,218/QALY).

CONCLUSIONS

Using economic models compliant with French methodology guidelines, 4CMenB does not seem cost-effective; however, results are sensitive to model choices and 4CMenB immunization is an effective strategy to prevent MenB IMD cases and to improve quality of life and economic burden associated with MenB IMD treatment, especially with regard to long-term sequelae.

Adverse events following immunisation: Prospective cohort study evaluating Australian children presenting to specialist immunisation clinics

OBJECTIVE

Prior experience of an adverse event following immunisation is a known barrier to vaccination. Limited Australian data evaluating adverse event recurrence among children exists to inform clinical decisions. We aimed to assess adverse event following immunisation recurrence among children with prior adverse events and to evaluate if family history increased adverse event risk.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted from March 3rd until August 18th, 2023. Children ≤ 16 years with prior adverse events following immunisation in themselves or family were recruited from specialist immunisation clinics at two quaternary paediatric hospitals. Adverse event outcomes were collected via surveys administered at presentation, three, and eight days post vaccination, and analysed by key characteristics and potential risk factors.

RESULTS

Forty three of forty nine (43/49, 87.8 %) children enrolled received further vaccines. Of those who completed the follow up surveys, 50.0 % (16/32) reported an adverse event. Recurrence of prior adverse events occurred for 23.3 % (10/43, 95 % CI: 11.8 % - 38.6 %) of the cohort. Two of twelve (2/12, 16.7 %) participants with prior serious adverse events who received further vaccines reported a serious adverse event recurrence. No post review serious adverse events were observed in children with prior non serious adverse events. Neurological conditions were a risk factor for prior (neurological condition 3/3 versus no neurological condition 2/40, p < 0.001) and post review (neurological condition 2/3 versus no neurological condition 0/28, p = 0.006) post vaccination seizures. Family history had no relationship to post review adverse events (family history 5/8 versus no family history 11/23, p = 0.685).

CONCLUSION

Revaccination is safe for the majority of children with a personal or family history of adverse event following immunisation.

Insights and expectations of healthcare professionals on the implementation of the updated pediatric regional immunization Calendar in Calabria, Italy

The Regional Immunization Calendar in Calabria, a region of Italy, was updated in 2022, introducing optional co-administration of three injectable vaccines, with one oral vaccine, at 3 and 5 months old, and three injectable vaccines at 13-14 months old. In this project, the opinions and expectations of healthcare professionals (HCPs) in Calabria were investigated, with respect to the updated recommended practices. An 11-question survey was developed, which addressed concepts and topics related to immunization calendar implementation. Focus group discussions were also organized to provide further insight on the survey findings. A total of 132 HCPs completed the survey (86 public health providers [PHs] and 46 family pediatricians [FPs]). Overall, ≥50% of respondents agreed that vaccine co-administration would be advantageous for public health by reducing the number of vaccination sessions required. Most PHs and FPs agreed that dissemination of available safety data on vaccine co-administration is a necessary action to facilitate effective implementation of the strategy into clinical practice. The importance of safety data related to vaccine co-administration was supported further by discussions held in PH and FP focus groups. Overall, these findings demonstrate support from HCPs in Calabria for vaccine co-administration, and highlight key activities needed for successful uptake.

Recent advances in various bio-applications of bacteria-derived outer membrane vesicles

Outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) are spherical nanoparticles released from gram-negative bacteria. OMVs were originally classified into native 'nOMVs' (produced naturally from budding of bacteria) and non-native (produced by mechanical means). nOMVs and detergent (dOMVs) are isolated from cell supernatant without any detergent cell disruption techniques and through detergent extraction, respectively. Growth stages and conditions e.g. different stress factors, including temperature, nutrition deficiency, and exposure to hazardous chemical agents can affect the yield of OMVs production and OMVs content. Because of the presence of bacterial antigens, pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), various proteins and the vesicle structure, OMVs have been developed in many biomedical applications. OMVs due to their size can be phagocytized by APCs, enter lymph vessels, transport antigens efficiently, and induce both T and B cells immune responses. Non-engineered OMVs have been frequently used as vaccines against different bacterial and viral infections, and various cancers. OMVs can also be used in combination with different antigens as an attractive vaccine adjuvant. Indeed, foreign antigens from target microorganisms can be trapped in the lumen of nonpathogenic vesicles or can be displayed on the surface through bacterial membrane protein to increase the immunogenicity of the antigens. In this review, different factors affecting OMV production including time of cultivation, growth media, stress conditions and genetic manipulations to enhance vesiculation will be described. Furthermore, recent advances in various biological applications of OMVs such as vaccine, drug delivery, cancer therapy, and enzyme carrier are discussed. Generally, the application of OMVs as vaccine carrier in three categories (i.e., non-engineered OMVs, OMVs as an adjuvant, recombinant OMVs (rOMVs)), as delivery system for small interfering RNA and therapeutic agents, and as enzymes carrier will be discussed.

Safety and immunogenicity of co-administered meningococcal serogroup B (4CMenB) vaccine: A literature review

The four-component meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (4CMenB) is indicated for the prevention of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) caused by Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B. Co-administering 4CMenB with other vaccines may improve vaccine uptake provided that the safety and immunogenicity of either are not affected. Published literature on the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of 4CMenB co-administered with other routine childhood and adulthood vaccines was reviewed. From 282 publications identified, data were collated from 10 clinical studies, 3 real-world studies, and 3 reviews. The evidence showed that 4CMenB co-administration is not associated with significant safety concerns or clinically relevant immunological interferences. The increased reactogenicity (e.g., fever) associated with 4CMenB co-administration can be adequately managed with prophylactic paracetamol in children. Thus, 4CMenB co-administration has the potential to maximize vaccine coverage and improve protection against IMD globally.

Italian immunization calendar implementation: Time to optimize number of vaccination appointments?

In the Italian vaccination schedule, at least six vaccination appointments are scheduled in the first year of life. This implies more discomfort for both the patient and the parents. This was particularly evident during the COVID-19 pandemic, during which several appointments were missed. A UK experience with three injectable vaccines and an oral one co-administered at the same appointment (4-in-1) at 2 and 4 months of age showed interesting results. The vaccination coverage was high, consistent with previous practice, and no relevant increase in adverse events was reported. Translating the UK experience into the Italian context would not be immediate, due to several organizational and social issues. Nevertheless, this option warrants some further considerations, which are discussed in this manuscript.

A Randomized Trial Assessing the Immunogenicity and Reactogenicity of Two Hexavalent Infant Vaccines Concomitantly Administered With Group B Meningococcal Vaccine

BACKGROUND

Three hexavalent (DTaP-IPV-Hib-HepB) vaccines are licensed in Europe, only one of which (Vaxelis, Hex-V), uses a meningococcal outer membrane protein complex as a carrier protein for Hemophilus influenza type b (Hib), creating potential interactions with the meningococcal vaccine 4CMenB.

METHODS

In this single-center open-label randomized trial, infants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive Hex-V or an alternative hexavalent vaccine (Infanrix-Hexa, Hex-IH) at 2, 3, and 4 months with 4CMenB (2, 4, and 12 months) in the UK routine immunization schedule. The primary outcome was noninferiority of geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) of anti-PRP (Hib) IgG at 5 months of age. Secondary outcomes included safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of other administered vaccines measured at 5 and 13 months of age.

RESULTS

Of the 194 participants enrolled, 96 received Hex-V and 98 Hex-IH. Noninferiority of anti-PRP IgG GMCs at 5 months of age in participants receiving Hex-V was established; GMCs were 23-times higher following three doses of Hex-V than three doses of Hex-IH (geometric mean ratio (GMR) 23.25; one-sided 95% CI 16.21, -). 78/85 (92%) of Hex-V recipients and 43/87 (49%) of Hex-IH recipients had anti-PRP antibodies ≥1.0 µg/mL. At 5 months of age serum, bactericidal activity titers against MenB strain 5/99 were higher following Hex-V than Hex-IH (GMR 1.56; 95% CI, 1.13-2.14). The reactogenicity profile was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support flexibility in the use of either Hex-IH or Hex-V in infant immunization schedules containing 4CMenB, with the possibility that Hex-V may enhance protection against Hib.

Timing of meningococcal vaccination with 4CMenB (Bexsero®) in children with invasive meningococcal group B (MenB) disease in England

BACKGROUND

Timely vaccination is critical for providing early protection against meningococcal B (MenB) disease because of the high incidence in early childhood. We assessed the timeliness of vaccination in children with confirmed MenB disease after 4CMenB (a recombinant protein-based vaccine) implementation into the national infant immunisation programme in England.

METHODS

Public Health England (PHE) conducts surveillance of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) in England. Children born since 01 July 2015 who developed MenB disease between 01 September 2015 and 31 August 2019 (four surveillance years) were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

There were 276 children with laboratory-confirmed MenB disease, including 36 infants who were too young for vaccination, 59 who were eligible for one 4CMenB dose, 104 for two doses and 77 for 3 doses before they developed MenB disease. Prior to developing MenB disease, there were 59 opportunities for vaccination with two 4CMenB doses in 48/104 (46.5%) eligible infants and 41 opportunities in 28/77 (36.6%) children aged ≥ 1 year who were under-immunised. A schedule with a shorter interval at 8 and 12 weeks of age, compared to the current schedule at 8 and 16 weeks, had the potential to offer an additional 4CMenB dose to 35/58 infants (58.6%) who developed MenB disease between 10 and 18 weeks of age.

CONCLUSIONS

A high proportion of infants and toddlers with laboratory-confirmed MenB disease had not received their scheduled 4CMenB vaccine prior to developing MenB disease. An infant priming schedule with a shorter interval of 4 weeks has the potential to provide earlier protection against MenB disease.

Vaccines

The safety of COVID-19 vaccines, as was the case last year, remains a large part of the focus in this volume. COVID-19 placed a large magnifying glass on both vaccines, specifically vaccine safety. This was most readily apparent as the number of records in VAERS ballooned to about 10 times the size from 2020 to 2021 (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2022) [S]. While we have added and/or improved VAERS during COVID-19, including adding or improving other vaccine safety surveillance tools like v-safe and vaccine safety datalink (Blumenthal, Phadke, et al., 2021) [MC], there is still room for improvement in these pharmacovigilance tools (Rizk et al., 2021) [r]. A major global initiative in this realm is the Global Vaccines Safety Blueprint 2.0 (GVSB2.0) (Organization, 2021, pp. 2021–2023) [S]. We wholeheartedly endorse these initiatives, which could significantly improve vaccine safety.

As noted in past SEDA issues, clinicians should be mindful of the risks of AEs and SAEs associated with each individual vaccine.

Safety evaluation of the DTaP5-IPV-Hib-HepB vaccine: a review

INTRODUCTION

The DTaP5-IPV-Hib-HepB vaccine is the most recently approved combination hexavalent vaccine. In Europe, it is licensed since 2016 for primary and booster vaccination in infants and toddlers above the age of 6 weeks to provide active immunization against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis, invasive diseases caused by Haemophilus influenzae type b and hepatitis B. In the US, DTaP5-IPV-Hib-HepB is approved since 2018 in children 6 weeks through 4 years of age. Its safety profile has been extensively documented in infants and children born at term, and also data in preterm infants are made available.

AREAS COVERED

In this article, we conducted a safety evaluation of the DTaP5-IPV-Hib-HepB vaccine in infants and toddlers considering evidence from clinical trials and post-marketing use, also with regard to data on special populations e.g. preterm infants.

EXPERT OPINION

Based on the available data, the DTaP5-IPV-Hib-HepB vaccine has demonstrated a good safety profile, similar to that of other approved penta- and hexavalent vaccines. Rather, post-marketing data are limited and are frequently reported in combination with other hexavalent vaccines or are not adjusted for shares of vaccines use. Neither relevant interferences with other co-administered pediatric vaccines nor safety issues in premature infants have been shown.

Postmarketing surveillance of adverse events following meningococcal B vaccination: data from Apulia Region, 2014-19

Since the multicomponent meningococcal B vaccine introduction, the Apulian Regional Health Authority implemented postmarketing surveillance program, as provided by Italian laws.

From National Pharmacovigilance Network, we selected 4CMenB AEFIs reported in Apulia from 01 January 2014 to 31 December 2019, while the number of 4 cMen B doses administered per year was obtained from the regional immunization database (GIAVA).

For each subject who experienced an adverse event following meningococcal B vaccine (AEFIs), a predefined form was filled in.

A total of 214 AEFIs (26.5 × 100.000 doses) were reported after any dose of MenB-4 c vaccination of which 58/214 (27.1%) were classified as serious (7.2 × 100,000 doses), 145/214 (67.8%) as not serious (180 × 100,000 doses), and 11/214 (5.1%) as undefined (1.3 × 100,000 doses).

The average age of subjects who experimented and AEFI was 30 months. The majority of serious AEFIs were reported in 2- to 11-month-old children (44/57; 77.2%). A total of 31/58 (3.8 × 100,000 doses; 53.4%) serious AEFIs were reported as having a ‘consistent causal association’ with vaccination. Of these, fever/hyperpyrexia was reported in 21/31 (2.6 × 100,000 doses; 67.7%); hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode was reported in 7/31 (0.9 × 100,000 doses [add %-age]) and was the most frequent adverse event with neurological symptoms. A total of 13/31 (41.9%) serious AEFIs classified as ‘consistent causal association’ were reported after the first dose of 4cMenB, of these 5/13 (38.5%) children did not complete the vaccination schedule.

Our data seemed to confirm, in a large population, the a good safety profile of the universal mass vaccination with 4CMENB.

Social media attention and citations of published outputs from re-use of clinical trial data: a matched comparison with articles published in the same journals

BACKGROUND

Data-sharing policies in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) should have an evaluation component. The main objective of this case-control study was to assess the impact of published re-uses of RCT data in terms of media attention (Altmetric) and citation rates.

METHODS

Re-uses of RCT data published up to December 2019 (cases) were searched for by two reviewers on 3 repositories (CSDR, YODA project, and Vivli) and matched to control papers published in the same journal. The Altmetric Attention Score (primary outcome), components of this score (e.g. mention of policy sources, media attention) and the total number of citations were compared between these two groups.

RESULTS

89 re-uses were identified: 48 (53.9%) secondary analyses, 34 (38.2%) meta-analyses, 4 (4.5%) methodological analyses and 3 (3.4%) re-analyses. The median (interquartile range) Altmetric Attention Scores were 5.9 (1.3-22.2) for re-use and 2.8 (0.3-12.3) for controls (p = 0.14). No statistical difference was found on any of the components of in the Altmetric Attention Score. The median (interquartile range) numbers of citations were 3 (1-8) for reuses and 4 (1 - 11.5) for controls (p = 0.30). Only 6/89 re-uses (6.7%) were cited in a policy source.

CONCLUSIONS

Using all available re-uses of RCT data to date from major data repositories, we were not able to demonstrate that re-uses attracted more attention than a matched sample of studies published in the same journals. Small average differences are still possible, as the sample size was limited. However matching choices have some limitations so results should be interpreted very cautiously. Also, citations by policy sources for re-uses were rare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registration: osf.io/fp62e.

Vaccines

In this volume of the Side Effects of Drugs Annual, although other vaccines will be covered, the safety of COVID vaccines is the focus as COVID-19 has led to heightened attention on vaccine safety in general. As such, this chapter will be more relevant than ever before. As noted in past SEDA issues, clinicians should be mindful of the risks of AEs and SAEs associated with each vaccine.

Success of 4CMenB in preventing meningococcal disease: evidence from real-world experience

Meningococcal disease remains one of the most feared infectious diseases worldwide because of its sudden onset, rapid progression and high case fatality rates, while survivors are often left with severe long-term sequelae. Young children have the highest incidence of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD), and nearly all cases in the UK, as in most of Europe and many other industrialised countries, are due to group B meningococci (MenB). The licensure of a broad-coverage, recombinant protein-based MenB vaccine (4CMenB) in 2013 was, therefore, heralded a major breakthrough in the fight against IMD. This vaccine was, however, licensed on immunogenicity and reactogenicity studies only, raising uncertainties about field effectiveness, long-term safety and antibody persistence. In 2015, the UK became the first country to implement 4CMenB into the national infant immunisation schedule and, since then, several countries have followed suit. Seven years after licensure, a wealth of real-world data has emerged to confirm 4CMenB effectiveness, along with large-scale safety data, duration of protection in different age groups, successful strategies to reduce vaccine reactogenicity, impact on carriage in adolescents and the potential for 4CMenB to protect against other meningococcal serogroups and against gonorrhoea. A number of questions, however, remain unanswered, including the investigation and management of vaccine-associated fever in infants, as well as disease severity and assessment of breakthrough cases in immunised children. Increasing use of 4CMenB will provide answers in due course. We now have vaccines against all the major serogroups causing IMD worldwide. Next-generation and combination vaccines against multiple serogroups look very promising.

Outer membrane vesicles: moving within the intricate labyrinth of assays that can predict risks of reactogenicity in humans

Outer membrane vesicles (OMV) are exosomes naturally released from the surface of Gram-negative bacteria. Since the ’80s, OMVs have been proposed as powerful vaccine platforms due to their intrinsic self-adjuvanticity and ability to present multiple antigens in natural conformation. However, the presence of several pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), especially lipid A, has raised concerns about potential systemic reactogenicity in humans. Recently, chemical and genetic approaches allowed to efficiently modulate the balance between reactogenicity and immunogenicity for the use of OMV in humans. Several assays (monocyte activation test, rabbit pyrogenicity test, limulus amebocyte lysate, human transfectant cells, and toxicology studies) were developed to test, with highly predictive potential, the risk of reactogenicity in humans before moving to clinical use. In this review, we provide a historical perspective on how different assays were and can be used to successfully evaluate systemic reactogenicity during clinical development and after licensure.