Immunogenicity and safety of concomitant administration of recombinant COVID-19 vaccine and quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in Chinese adults: An open-label, randomized, controlled trial

The immunogenicity and safety of the concomitant administration of recombinant COVID-19 vaccine and quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (Split Virion) (QIIV) in Chinese adults are unclear. In this open-label, randomized controlled trial, participants aged ≥ 18 years were recruited. Eligible healthy adults were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive QIIV at the same time as the first dose of COVID-19 vaccine (simultaneous-group) or 14 days after the second dose of COVID-19 vaccine (non-simultaneous-group). The primary outcome was to compare the difference in immunogenicity of QIIV (H1N1, H3N2, Yamagata, and Victoria) between the two groups. A total of 299 participants were enrolled, 149 in the simultaneous-group and 150 in the non-simultaneous-group. There were no significant differences in geometric mean titer (GMT) [H1N1: 386.4 (95%CI: 299.2-499.0) vs. 497.4 (95%CI: 377.5-655.3); H3N2: 66.9 (95%CI: 56.1-79.8) vs. 81.4 (95%CI: 67.9-97.5); Yamagata: 95.6 (95%CI: 79.0-115.8) vs. 74.3 (95%CI: 58.6-94.0); and Victoria: 48.5 (95%CI: 37.6-62.6) vs. 65.8 (95%CI: 49.0-88.4)] and seroconversion rate (H1N1: 87.5% vs. 90.1%; H3N2: 58.1% vs. 62.0%; Yamagata: 75.0% vs. 64.5%; and Victoria: 55.1% vs. 62.8%) of QIIV antibodies between the simultaneous and non-simultaneous groups. For the seroprotection rate of QIIV antibodies, a higher seroprotection rate of Yamagata antibody was observed only in the simultaneous-group than in the non-simultaneous-group [86.0% vs. 76.0%, p = .040]. In addition, no significant difference in adverse events was observed between the two groups (14.2% vs. 23.5%, p = .053). In conclusion, no immune interference or safety concerns were found for concomitant administration of COVID-19 vaccine with QIIV in adults aged ≥ 18 years.

Evaluation of the efficacy, safety and influencing factors of concomitant and sequential administration of viral respiratory infectious disease vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

There is no clear conclusion on the immunogenicity and adverse events of concomitant administration the viral respiratory infectious disease vaccines. We aimed to evaluate the impact of concomitant administering viral respiratory infectious disease vaccines on efficiencies, safety and influencing factors.

Methods

This meta-analysis included studies from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials, Web of Science, WHO COVID-19 Research, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. Randomized controlled trials of the adult participants concomitant administered with viral respiratory infectious disease vaccine and other vaccines were included. The main outcomes were the seroconversion rate and seroprotection rate of each vaccine. Used the Mantel-Haenszel fixed effects method as the main analysis to estimate the pooled RRs and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals. The risk of bias for each trial was assessed using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, while evidence certainty was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system.

Results

A total of 21 studies comprising 14060 participants with two types of vaccines were retained for the meta-analysis. Concomitant immunization reduced the geometric mean titer (RR: 0.858, 95% CI: (0.785 to 0.939)) and the geometric mean fold rise (0.754 (0.629 to 0.902)) in the SARS-COV-2 vaccine group but increased the seroconversion rate (1.033 (1.0002 to 1.067)) in the seasonal influenza vaccine group. Concomitant administration were influenced by the type of vaccine, adjuvant content, booster immunization, and age and gender of the recipient.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis suggested that the short-term protection and safety of concomitant administered were effective. Appropriate adjuvants, health promotion and counselling and booster vaccines could improve the efficiency and safety of Concomitant vaccination.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022343709.

Safety and immunogenicity of co-administered meningococcal serogroup B (4CMenB) vaccine: A literature review

The four-component meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (4CMenB) is indicated for the prevention of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) caused by Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B. Co-administering 4CMenB with other vaccines may improve vaccine uptake provided that the safety and immunogenicity of either are not affected. Published literature on the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of 4CMenB co-administered with other routine childhood and adulthood vaccines was reviewed. From 282 publications identified, data were collated from 10 clinical studies, 3 real-world studies, and 3 reviews. The evidence showed that 4CMenB co-administration is not associated with significant safety concerns or clinically relevant immunological interferences. The increased reactogenicity (e.g., fever) associated with 4CMenB co-administration can be adequately managed with prophylactic paracetamol in children. Thus, 4CMenB co-administration has the potential to maximize vaccine coverage and improve protection against IMD globally.

Resveratrol in Liquor Exacerbates Alcoholic Liver Injury with a Reduced Therapeutic Effect in Mice: An Unsupervised Herbal Wine Habit Is Risky

People in Eastern countries hold a tradition of soaking herbal medicine in wine; however, the efficacy and safety of herbal wine have not been rigorously assessed. By assessing the efficacy of resveratrol (RSV) in ethanol against alcoholic liver disease (ALD) in mice, we aimed to offer a perspective on the use of herbal wine. To simulate the behaviour of herbal wine users, RSV (15 mg/kg) soaked in ethanol (RSV-alcohol) was administrated via gavage to the mice, here with alcohol consumption-induced ALD. RSV soaked in water (RSV-water) was the treatment control. The efficacy and safety of RSV on ALD were evaluated. Compared with the RSV-water group, a higher rate of mortality was found in the RSV-alcohol group (50.0% vs. 20.0%), which also exhibited more severe liver injury. RSV significantly increased the exposure of alcohol by 126.0%, which was accompanied by a significant inhibition of the ethanol metabolic pathway. In contrast, alcohol consumption significantly reduced exposure to RSV by 95.0%. Alcohol consumption had little effect on the expression of drug-metabolizing enzymes in RSV; however, alcohol seemed to reduce the absorption of RSV. RSV in liquor exacerbates alcoholic liver injury and has a reduced therapeutic effect, suggesting that the habit of herbal wine use without supervision is risky.

Safety assessment of concurrent statin treatment and evaluation of drug interactions in China

Objectives

Acute muscle injury and potentially fatal rhabdomyolysis may occur with the use of statins and certain enzyme inhibitors, but data on this topic from China are quite limited. This study aimed to measure the concomitant exposure of patients to different statins and their enzyme inhibitors or interacting medications in 76 hospitals in six Chinese cities.

Methods

Prescription database was retrieved from Hospital Prescription Analysis Cooperation Project from January 2015 to December 2015, covering 76 tertiary facilities in six cities in China. Every evidence-based enzyme inhibitor was included, and labeled enzyme inhibitors and other relevant information were identified and obtained using the Drug Safety Update from the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency. The proportions of different statin types among all patients and those co-medicated with their inhibitors were examined.

Results

A total of 296,765 patients exposed to statins were included in this study. 80% of patients (n = 144,863, 80.5%) were concomitantly prescribed a CYP3A4-metabolized statin with an interacting drug during the study period. Among those prescribed a non-CYP3A4-metabolized statin, 40.0% of patients were concomitantly given an interacting drug, and approximately 20% of patients were concomitantly given a labeled inhibitor, predominantly calcium channel blockers, other statins, and fibrates. Rates of co-prescription were higher in patients aged over 65 years and in patients taking high-dose statins.

Conclusion

Statins were frequently co-prescribed with metabolic inhibitors in China, where drug safety strategy on highlighting warnings and contraindications of statins are still lacking. For high-dose statins patients who are over 65 years and co-administered with any metabolic inhibitors, prescribers and pharmacists should be more concerned in order to prevent adverse drug reactions.