1
|
Greenberg ET, LaFay V, Smith L, Benson G. Exploring the Impact of Self-Leadership on Evidence-Based Practice Beliefs Among Physical Therapists and Doctor of Physical Therapy Students. JOURNAL, PHYSICAL THERAPY EDUCATION 2025:00001416-990000000-00172. [PMID: 40333612 DOI: 10.1097/jte.0000000000000409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2024] [Accepted: 02/06/2025] [Indexed: 05/09/2025]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study explored the self-leadership and evidence-based practice (EBP) beliefs among Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students and licensed physical therapists (PTs). REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE Evidence-based practice offers health care professionals a systematic approach to applying research to improve patient outcomes. Despite positive attitudes toward EBP, PTs often struggle to translate scientific knowledge into clinical practice. While many frameworks emphasize the importance of organizational leadership in EBP, self-leadership, directing oneself toward personal goals, remains underexplored. SUBJECTS The study included 860 participants: 158 DPT students, 235 early-career PTs with less than 10 years of clinical experience, and 467 late-career PTs with 10 or more years of experience. METHODS A cross-sectional online survey explored the relationship and group differences between Revised Self-Leadership Questionnaire scores and Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Beliefs Scale scores among physical therapists and DPT students. The statistical analysis approaches included Spearman's Rank Correlations, Kruskal-Wallis H tests, and multiple stepwise regressions. RESULTS Weak correlations existed between self-leadership and EBP beliefs in DPT students and late-career PTs, while a moderate correlation was observed in early-career PTs. Although self-leadership and EBP beliefs varied between groups, the differences were minor. Intrinsic DPT student and physical therapist characteristics showed minimal predictive value for EBP beliefs, highlighting the continued complexity of understanding EBP beliefs and implementation within the physical therapy profession. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION A persistent gap exists in understanding the clinician-specific factors influencing EBP beliefs in physical therapy. These findings emphasize the need to identify and cultivate factors positively affecting EBP adoption and self-leadership among physical therapists and students. Future research should look to understand the complex interplay between personal attributes and organizational dynamics to enhance EBP implementation in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric T Greenberg
- Eric T. Greenberg is an associate professor in the Department of Physical Therapy at the New York Institute of Technology, Northern Blvd, Ferentinos Health Sciences Building, Room 335, Old Westbury, NY 11568 . Please address all correspondence to Eric T. Greenberg
- Vicki LaFay is a professor in the Department of Physical Therapy at the University of the Cumberlands
- Luke Smith is an assistant professor in the Department of Leadership Studies at the University of the Cumberlands
- Greg Benson is the adjunct professor, in the Department of Leadership Studies, at the University of the Cumberlands
| | - Vicki LaFay
- Eric T. Greenberg is an associate professor in the Department of Physical Therapy at the New York Institute of Technology, Northern Blvd, Ferentinos Health Sciences Building, Room 335, Old Westbury, NY 11568 . Please address all correspondence to Eric T. Greenberg
- Vicki LaFay is a professor in the Department of Physical Therapy at the University of the Cumberlands
- Luke Smith is an assistant professor in the Department of Leadership Studies at the University of the Cumberlands
- Greg Benson is the adjunct professor, in the Department of Leadership Studies, at the University of the Cumberlands
| | - Luke Smith
- Eric T. Greenberg is an associate professor in the Department of Physical Therapy at the New York Institute of Technology, Northern Blvd, Ferentinos Health Sciences Building, Room 335, Old Westbury, NY 11568 . Please address all correspondence to Eric T. Greenberg
- Vicki LaFay is a professor in the Department of Physical Therapy at the University of the Cumberlands
- Luke Smith is an assistant professor in the Department of Leadership Studies at the University of the Cumberlands
- Greg Benson is the adjunct professor, in the Department of Leadership Studies, at the University of the Cumberlands
| | - Greg Benson
- Eric T. Greenberg is an associate professor in the Department of Physical Therapy at the New York Institute of Technology, Northern Blvd, Ferentinos Health Sciences Building, Room 335, Old Westbury, NY 11568 . Please address all correspondence to Eric T. Greenberg
- Vicki LaFay is a professor in the Department of Physical Therapy at the University of the Cumberlands
- Luke Smith is an assistant professor in the Department of Leadership Studies at the University of the Cumberlands
- Greg Benson is the adjunct professor, in the Department of Leadership Studies, at the University of the Cumberlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Granviken F, Meisingset I, Bach K, Bones AF, Simpson MR, Hill JC, van der Windt DA, Vasseljen O. Personalised decision support in the management of patients with musculoskeletal pain in primary physiotherapy care: a cluster randomised controlled trial (the SupportPrim project). Pain 2025; 166:1167-1178. [PMID: 39432806 PMCID: PMC12004987 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2024] [Revised: 09/11/2024] [Accepted: 09/12/2024] [Indexed: 10/23/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT We developed the SupportPrim PT clinical decision support system (CDSS) using the artificial intelligence method case-based reasoning to support personalised musculoskeletal pain management. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the CDSS for patients in physiotherapy practice. A cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted in primary care in Norway. We randomised 44 physiotherapists to (1) use the CDSS alongside usual care or (2) usual care alone. The CDSS provided personalised treatment recommendations based on a case base of 105 patients with positive outcomes. During the trial, the case-based reasoning system did not have an active learning capability; therefore, the case base size remained the same throughout the study. We included 724 patients presenting with neck, shoulder, back, hip, knee, or complex pain (CDSS; n = 358, usual care; n = 366). Primary outcomes were assessed with multilevel logistic regression using self-reported Global Perceived Effect (GPE) and Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS). At 12 weeks, 165/298 (55.4%) patients in the intervention group and 176/321 (54.8%) in the control group reported improvement in GPE (odds ratio, 1.18; confidence interval, 0.50-2.78). For PSFS, 173/290 (59.7%) patients in the intervention group and 218/310 (70.3%) in the control group reported clinically important improvement in function (odds ratio, 0.41; confidence interval, 0.20-0.85). No significant between-group differences were found for GPE. For PSFS, there was a significant difference favouring the control group, but this was less than the prespecified difference of 15%. We identified several study limitations and recommend further investigation into artificial intelligence applications for managing musculoskeletal pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fredrik Granviken
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
- Clinic of Rehabilitation, St Olav's Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Ingebrigt Meisingset
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
- Unit for Physiotherapy Services, Trondheim Municipality, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Kerstin Bach
- Department of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | - Anita Formo Bones
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | - Melanie Rae Simpson
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | - Jonathan C. Hill
- School of Medicine, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom
| | | | - Ottar Vasseljen
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alhammad SA, Almuhanna OK, Aljumaah AR, Aldosari MS. Determinants of Appointment Planning in Physical Therapy: Insights from Saudi Arabia. Healthcare (Basel) 2025; 13:893. [PMID: 40281842 PMCID: PMC12026456 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13080893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2025] [Revised: 03/16/2025] [Accepted: 04/11/2025] [Indexed: 04/29/2025] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Appointment planning in physical therapy (PT) is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes and resource efficiency, yet determinants of these plans and deviations from them remain underexplored. This study aimed to explore how physical therapists in Saudi Arabia determine appointment numbers, their preferred planning methods, and the prevalence and contributing factors of deviations from planned appointments. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted using an electronic questionnaire distributed to PTs practicing in outpatient departments and homecare settings across Saudi Arabia. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize therapists' methods, preferences, and the prevalence of and potential reasons for deviations. Results: A total of 434 responses were collected. Most therapists (66%) relied on their evaluation to determine the number of appointments, and this was their preferred method (76%). However, 50% reported patients usually requiring more appointments than initially planned, and 14% did not complete all the planned appointments. Faster-than-expected progress (61%) and slower-than-expected progress (58%) were the primary reasons for deviations. Conclusions: Despite most therapists determining the number of appointments based on their evaluation, the majority reported usual deviations from planned appointments, highlighting a gap in appointment planning. Future research should investigate the impact of deviations on patient outcomes and healthcare costs. Strategies to reduce deviations, such as improving adherence to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saad A. Alhammad
- Department of Rehabilitation Health Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 10219, Riyadh 11433, Saudi Arabia; (O.K.A.); (A.R.A.); (M.S.A.)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Daher A, Dar G. Physician referrals of patients with neck and low back pain for physical therapy in outpatient clinics: a cross-sectional study. Isr J Health Policy Res 2025; 14:20. [PMID: 40181474 PMCID: PMC11970003 DOI: 10.1186/s13584-025-00683-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2025] [Indexed: 04/05/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients commonly seek outpatient physical therapy services for musculoskeletal disorders. Understanding these patient groups in Israel provides valuable insights into the healthcare system. We aimed to investigate physician referral patterns for physical therapy across different age and sex groups, focusing on neck and low back pain. Additionally, we sought to explore the therapeutic interventions provided by physical therapists for these conditions. METHODS For this retrospective, cross-sectional study we utilized data from a national health maintenance organization covering > 4 million people at 100 physical therapy outpatient clinics. We measured the prevalence rates of physicians' referral patterns for neck and low back pain according to age and sex, as well as therapeutic interventions prescribed by physical therapists. We used Z-tests to assess the differences in prevalence rates between women and men within the same age group. Logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the likelihood of patients of a specific age group being referred to physical therapy compared with the total sample. We analyzed prevalence rates of different treatment protocols used by physical therapists according to these referrals. RESULTS Overall, 1,593,592 physician referrals for physical therapy were made over 6 years for all musculoskeletal conditions. Of those, 32.4% were for spine disorders, with 21.2% for low back pain and 11.1% for neck pain, mostly chronic (80.6% and 72.7%, respectively). Women were more likely than men to be referred for both low back pain (odds ratio = 1.36, 95% confidence interval = 1.34-1.38, p < 0.001) and neck pain (1.40, 1.37-1.43, p < 0.001). All referral rates increased with age. The most common treatment provided by physical therapists for neck and low back pain was education and advice for an active lifestyle. CONCLUSIONS This study provides comprehensive data that highlight significant trends related to age, acuteness, and sex. Chronic low back and neck pain are the predominant reasons for physical therapy referrals, particularly among women and older adults. Physician referrals for neck and low back pain aligned with the epidemiology of such conditions in the Israeli population, underscoring the need for targeted rehabilitation strategies, early intervention programs, and effective healthcare service planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amira Daher
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Social Welfare & Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Studies, Zefat Academic College, Zefat, Israel
- Department of Health Systems Administration, Max Stern Academic College of Emek Yezreel, Yezreel Valley, Israel
| | - Gali Dar
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Social Welfare & Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
- Physical Therapy Clinic, The Ribstein Center for Sport Medicine Sciences and Research, Wingate Institute, Netanya, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rostami KD, Thomas A, Naderi A. Effect of fatigue on neuromuscular and biomechanical variables after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2025; 65:554-561. [PMID: 39787009 DOI: 10.23736/s0022-4707.24.16210-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2025]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This systematic review is aimed to evaluate the outcomes of published studies on the topic of fatigue-induced neuromuscular and biomechanical changes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The identification of studies involved a search across three databases - PubMed, Scopus, and Sportdiscus - until July 2023. The key terms utilized were fatigue, anterior cruciate ligament, biomechanics, electromyography, and landing. Included in the analysis were studies that examined the impact of fatigue on neuromuscular or biomechanical variables in individuals with ACLR, with comparisons drawn to either the contralateral side or healthy controls. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Fourteen studies, involving 396 athletes (245 males, 151 females; mean age 23.43 years) met the inclusion criteria. Among these studies, eleven employed general fatigue protocols, and three used peripheral protocols. The tasks varied across the studies, including single-leg landing tasks, maximum voluntary isometric contraction tests, forward jump, and squat. Despite differing tasks, the findings regarding the impact of fatigue on lower limb kinematics, kinetics, and surface electromyography muscle activation patterns were inconsistent. However, in the majority of cases, the response to fatigue was similar between individuals who had undergone ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and healthy. CONCLUSIONS The main finding of this systematic review was that fatigue changed things sometimes, however, fatigue did not change biomechanics and activity patterns differently in patients after ACLR vs. controls. General fatigue protocols did not produce enough stimulation to show deference between ACLRs and controls. Future studies should focus on different fatigue protocols (such as sport-specific protocols) and more challenging landing tasks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Komeil D Rostami
- Department of Motor Behavior and Biomechanics, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, University of Mazandaran, Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran -
| | - Abbey Thomas
- Department of Applied Physiology, Health, and Clinical Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Aynollah Naderi
- Department of Health and Corrective Exercise, School of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Semnan, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Walker ED, Gibbs MT, Natoli AR, Jones MD. Navigating complexities: clinicians' experiences and systemic challenges in the implementation of evidence-based practice for chronic low back pain - a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil 2025; 47:1697-1707. [PMID: 39001692 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2378371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Revised: 07/03/2024] [Accepted: 07/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE Implementation of evidence-based practice (EBP) for chronic low back pain (CLBP) is poor. This study aimed to investigate the factors that influence exercise-based clinicians' implementation of EBP for people with CLBP. MATERIALS AND METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 40 clinicians (20 physiotherapists and 20 accredited exercise physiologists). Interviews explored clinicians' definition of EBP, understanding of EBP in CLBP management, barriers and enablers to EBP, and the impact of these factors on EBP implementation. Interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS A complex interplay among clinician factors, systemic factors, and patient interactions was identified. Clinicians encountered challenges stemming from their misconceptions about EBP, which influenced their perspective(s) on its implementation. Clinicians expressed the challenges of implementing EBP when navigating patient expectations and beliefs, experiencing external pressures from funders and business models, and the subsequent impacts on their well-being. Continuing professional development, support from community, and workplaces that prioritised EBP enhanced clinicians' ability to make decisions that accommodate for the complexities of CLBP and better align with EBP. CONCLUSION A variety of factors impact exercise-based clinicians' implementation of EBP. The interaction between these factors greatly influences clinicians' ability to engage in and implement EBP in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily D Walker
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | - Mitchell T Gibbs
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | - Andrew R Natoli
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | - Matthew D Jones
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mushari D, Shaheen AA. Physical therapists' perspectives and clinical practice on assessment, rehabilitation, and return to sport criteria after anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction in Saudi Arabia. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2025:10538127251329009. [PMID: 40152023 DOI: 10.1177/10538127251329009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/29/2025]
Abstract
Background and objectivesTo explore the physical therapists' (PTs) perspectives and clinical practice on assessment, rehabilitation, and return to sports (RTS) criteria and to investigate their associations with gender, level of educational qualification, years of clinical experience, and the number of individuals treated after ACL injury and reconstruction (ACLR) in Saudi Arabia (SA).MethodsThis descriptive cross-sectional study surveyed 206 participants through an online survey covering demographics, ACLR rehabilitation importance, clinical measurements, practice, progression criteria, return to running, and RTS.ResultsMost PTs (84.9%) see an individual post-ACLR for the first time within the first week. About 24.8% of PTs preferred starting open kinetic chain (OKC) exercises one to seven days immediately post-ACLR. The timing of returning to running post-ACLR is variable among participants. Between six to nine months, 39.8% of PTs allowed an individual post-ACLR to RTS. Over 40% of participants did not use patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to clear an individual post-ACLR to RTS or evaluate psychological readiness. About 76.2% recommended an ACL injury prevention program at discharge.ConclusionMost PTs in SA inconsistently follow evidence-based ACLR rehabilitation practices. Education and training programs are needed to bridge the evidence-to-practice gap in post-ACLR care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dina Mushari
- Department of Health Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Physical Therapy, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Afaf Am Shaheen
- Department of Health Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Faculty of Physical Therapy, Department of Basic Sciences, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kühn L, Choi KE, Klugarová J, Bała M, Peričić TP, Klugar M, Prill R. Enhancing physiotherapists' knowledge and skills in facilitating self-management of patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions: a best practice implementation project. JBI Evid Implement 2025:02205615-990000000-00171. [PMID: 40110796 DOI: 10.1097/xeb.0000000000000506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/22/2025]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Evidence-based self-management strategies in chronic disease management are associated with increased self-efficacy and improved health-related quality of life. Physiotherapists feel unprepared to promote these strategies in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions. OBJECTIVE The objective of this best practice implementation project was to assess and promote exercise-centered self-management strategies in physiotherapy care. METHODS JBI's Evidence Implementation Framework, Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System (PACES) audit tool, and Getting Research into Practice (GRiP) method were used. The project was conducted in Germany at the University Hospital of the Brandenburg Medical School in the Department of Physiotherapy. Barriers and facilitators to implementation were identified through qualitative interviews with musculoskeletal pain experts in the team (N = 5). All team members (N = 16) completed a 31-item standardized questionnaire to determine compliance with seven audit criteria. The results of the baseline audit informed the implementation strategy. A post-implementation audit was conducted to measure improvements in practice. RESULTS Baseline compliance with audit criteria ranged from 0% to 89%. Barriers to implementation included lack of knowledge on self-management facilitation (e.g., assessment of patient capabilities, pain education, goal-setting, self-monitoring, action plan development) and no standardized documentation. The implementation strategy combined interactive educational training with the introduction of two standardized assessment and documentation forms. Moreover, a short-form exercise diary was created to facilitate patient self-monitoring. In the follow-up audit, five of the seven audit criteria improved. CONCLUSIONS A combination of interactive educational training, standardized physiotherapy assessment and documentation, and a short-form exercise diary may be appropriate strategies to increase compliance for exercise-related self-management facilitation. SPANISH ABSTRACT http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A345.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Kühn
- Center for Health Services Research, Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Brandenburg Medical School, Neuruppin, Germany
- Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School, Neuruppin, Germany
- Center of Evidence Based Practice in Brandenburg: A JBI Affiliated Group, Brandenburg/Havel Brandenburg Medical School, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Kyung-Eun Choi
- Center for Health Services Research, Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Brandenburg Medical School, Neuruppin, Germany
- Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School, Neuruppin, Germany
- Center of Evidence Based Practice in Brandenburg: A JBI Affiliated Group, Brandenburg/Havel Brandenburg Medical School, Neuruppin, Germany
- Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine/Dentistry, Danube Private University, Krems-Stein, Austria
| | - Jitka Klugarová
- Cochrane Czech Republic, Czech Republic: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Czech GRADE Network, Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Małgorzata Bała
- Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Department of Hygiene and Dietetics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
| | | | - Miloslav Klugar
- Cochrane Czech Republic, Czech Republic: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Czech GRADE Network, Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Robert Prill
- Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School, Neuruppin, Germany
- Center of Evidence Based Practice in Brandenburg: A JBI Affiliated Group, Brandenburg/Havel Brandenburg Medical School, Neuruppin, Germany
- Center of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Brandenburg/Havel, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg/Havel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fourré A, Michielsen J, Ris L, Darlow B, Vanderstraeten R, Bastiaens H, Demoulin C, Roussel N. Comparing the impact of interactive versus traditional e-learning on physiotherapists' knowledge, attitudes, and clinical decision-making in low back pain management: a randomized controlled trial. J Man Manip Ther 2025:1-14. [PMID: 40089875 DOI: 10.1080/10669817.2025.2476670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/03/2025] [Indexed: 03/17/2025] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite the recommendations to use a bio-psycho-social framework, many physiotherapists still manage their patients mainly from a biomedical point of view. The purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of two different e-learning interventions on knowledge, attitudes, and clinical decision-making of physiotherapists managing low back pain (LBP) to increase guideline-consistent care. METHODS Physiotherapists were allocated (1/1) either to an experimental or a traditional e-learning intervention. Baseline and post-intervention assessment included the Health Care Providers' Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale (HC-PAIRS), Back Pain Attitudes Questionnaire (Back-PAQ), Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (NPQ), and a clinical vignette. Participants had 2 weeks to complete the post-intervention assessment. Statistics were processed using ANCOVA and Fisher's t-tests. RESULTS Four hundred nineteen physiotherapists were included in the analysis. Mean scores of HC-PAIRS, Back-PAQ, and NPQ significantly improved post-intervention in both groups. There was a significant effect of the intervention type (experimental versus traditional) on the scores of HC-PAIRS (p < .001; η2p = .243) and Back-PAQ (p < .001; η2p = .135) but not on NPQ scores. Return to work, recommendations assessed with the clinical vignette were significantly more guideline-consistent in the experimental group (p < .001) post-intervention. CONCLUSION An interactive e-learning intervention which includes concrete clinical examples and focused on patient's reassurance, self-management, and importance of screening psycho-social factors had more impact than a traditional e-learning intervention to enhance physiotherapists' knowledge, attitudes, and clinical decision-making regarding LBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Fourré
- Department of Neurosciences, Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons, Mons, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (MOVANT), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Jef Michielsen
- Orthopedic Department, University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Laurence Ris
- Department of Neurosciences, Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons, Mons, Belgium
| | - Ben Darlow
- Department of Primary Health Care and General Practice, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Rob Vanderstraeten
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (MOVANT), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Hilde Bastiaens
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (MOVANT), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Christophe Demoulin
- Department of Sport and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Nathalie Roussel
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (MOVANT), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Althumali AM, Alzahrani H. Assessing Physiotherapists' Adherence to Clinical Practice Guidelines for Ankle Sprain Management in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study with National Online Survey. J Clin Med 2025; 14:1889. [PMID: 40142697 PMCID: PMC11942653 DOI: 10.3390/jcm14061889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2025] [Revised: 02/16/2025] [Accepted: 03/06/2025] [Indexed: 03/28/2025] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Ankle sprain is one of the most common sports injuries globally. Despite its prevalence, the adequacy of knowledge in managing ankle sprain among physiotherapists in Saudi Arabia has not been assessed. This study aimed to assess the knowledge and degree of adherence to clinical practice guidelines (CPG) for the management of ankle sprains among physiotherapists. Methods: This study was a cross-sectional with national online questionnaire administered to participants through an online platform. It comprised three sections. The first section collected demographic data. The second section presented two clinical cases as the basis for the participants' management decisions (the first with negative Ottawa Ankle Rules (OAR) and the second with positive OAR); participants were classified as "following", "partially following", "not following", and "partially not following" the CPGs. In the third section, on a Likert scale (1-5), participants indicated how much they agreed with various CPGs statements. Results: A total of 381 physiotherapists (mean age: 28 ± 5; male: 57.1%) completed the questionnaire. In the case of acute ankle sprain with negative OAR, 0.2% of the participants were considered as "following" CPGs, 31.4% as "partially following", 19.6% as "partially not following", and 48.5% as "not-following". In the case of acute ankle sprain with positive OAR, 5.2% were considered as "following" CPGs, 55.9% as "partially not following", and 38.8% as "not following". The knowledge assessment section elicited a 50% agreement among the participants on the 11 provided statements. Conclusions: Most physiotherapists have suboptimal adherence to CPG for managing ankle sprains, thus highlighting an evidence-to-practice gap.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hosam Alzahrani
- Department of Physical Therapy, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21994, Saudi Arabia;
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hiyama Y, Taniguchi M, Ohtera S, Wada O, Tanaka S, Kako M. Quality indicators for the rehabilitation before and after total knee arthroplasty in Japan: a modified Delphi method and practice test. ARTHROPLASTY 2025; 7:11. [PMID: 40045402 PMCID: PMC11884041 DOI: 10.1186/s42836-024-00297-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2024] [Accepted: 12/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is important to adhere to the pertinent guidelines to ensure evidence-based rehabilitation of patients with total knee arthroplasty (TKA); however, studies have suggested that pre- and post-TKA rehabilitation provided in Japan may not be adequately evidence-based. Quality indicators (QIs) translate practice guidelines into actionable and measurable statements by identifying the clinical context, timing, and target population. This study aimed to develop QIs for pre- and post-TKA rehabilitation in Japan. Additionally, a pilot practice test was conducted to assess the feasibility and applicability of the developed QIs prior to their actual clinical application. METHODS This study used a modified Delphi technique (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method). A nine-member panel of clinicians and researchers evaluated the 49 proposed QIs related to rehabilitation before and after TKA. Panelists independently rated the 49 candidate QIs on a 9-point Likert scale and discussed these QIs in an online meeting. After the meeting, the panelists independently re-rated the QIs, and QIs with a median score of 7 or higher and score of less than 3 by two or fewer panelists were adopted as the final QIs. In addition, a pilot practice test was conducted to assess the feasibility and applicability of the developed QIs by retrospectively analyzing the medical records at two hospitals. RESULTS Forty-nine candidate QIs were developed based on one set of QIs, nine practice guidelines, eight best practice recommendations, and 162 systematic reviews. Finally, 36 indicators, including two new ones, were adopted consensually by nine panelists. Among these 36 indicators, some had overlapping elements, so they were consolidated and organized into 24 indicators. The pilot test (n = 352) revealed a median QI performance of 86.1 (IQR, 56.1-100), with six QIs demonstrating performance levels below 10%. This low performance indicated that the proportion of patients receiving rehabilitation in accordance with the indicators was actually low. CONCLUSIONS This study developed 36 QIs for patients undergoing rehabilitation before and after TKA in Japan. Although their feasibility was confirmed at two facilities, future studies are warranted to measure the quality of care more comprehensively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshinori Hiyama
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.
| | - Masashi Taniguchi
- Graduate School of Medicine, Human Health Sciences, Kyoto University, 53-Kawahara-ChoSakyo-Ku, ShogoinKyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Shosuke Ohtera
- Department of Health Economics, Center for Gerontology and Social Science, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Research Institute, 7-430 Morioka-Cho, Obu City, Aichi, 474-8511, Japan
| | - Osamu Wada
- Anshin Hospital, 1-4-12 Minatojima-Minamimachi, Chuo-Ku, Kobe City, Hyogo, 650-0047, Japan
| | - So Tanaka
- Fukuoka Orthopaedic Hospital, 2-10-50 Yanagochi, Minami-Ku, Fukuoka City, Fukuoka, 815-0063, Japan
| | - Masato Kako
- Toyota Memorial Hospital, 1-1 Heiwacho, Toyota City, Aichi, 471-8513, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Estberger A, Thorborg K, Talts H, Ageberg E. Clinical assessment and treatment of patients presenting with longstanding hip and groin pain in primary care: a survey study among physical therapists and general practitioners in Sweden. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2025; 26:218. [PMID: 40033287 PMCID: PMC11877932 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-025-08466-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2025] [Indexed: 03/05/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Methods of assessment, treatment and referral rates of patients presenting with longstanding hip and groin pain (LHGP) are not well documented. The aim of this study was to investigate assessment and treatment of patients with LHGP among general practitioners (GPs) and physical therapists (PTs) in primary care. METHODS An anonymous web-based survey was developed specifically for this study and distributed to GPs and PTs at primary care centers in the southern part of Sweden. The survey covered the use of different methods of assessment and treatment for LHGP, the perceived importance these methods, and referral rates to orthopedic care. Responses from clinicians were reported in frequencies and percentages, and differences in assessment methodology between professions were examined with chi-square tests. RESULTS PTs (n = 104) and GPs (n = 62) referred less than 25% of patients with LHGP to orthopedic care. Both professions used clinical assessments as range of motion tests, but PTs were more likely to use specific clinical tests (PTs 76% vs. GPs 19%, p = < 0.001), GPs used more imaging (GPs 98% vs. PTs 58%, p = < 0.001) and neither profession used validated patient-reported outcome measures (GPs 2% vs. PTs 11%, p = 0.134). GPs and PTs ranked patient history and range of motion as the most important factors for diagnosis. GPs and PTs both reported providing patient education and advice on physical activity as part of the treatment. GPs commonly prescribed pain medication, including NSAIDs (97%), paracetamol (100%), and opioids (69%). 77% of PTs reported treatment duration less than 3 months, with treatment consisting of combinations of exercise therapy and manual therapy. CONCLUSIONS GPs and PTs in primary care referred 25% or less of patients with LHGP to orthopedic care. Both professions generally used assessment for LHGP in line with clinical recommendations. However, some assessment methods differed between GPs and PTs, and neither used validated patient-reported outcome measures. Treatment strategies mainly included pain medication (GPs), exercise and manual therapy (PTs), and education (both professions). Inconsistent with clinical recommendations, GPs commonly prescribed opioids as part of pain management, and PTs report treatment duration of less than 3 months. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER NA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- August Estberger
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
| | - Kristian Thorborg
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Sports Orthopedic Research Center- Copenhagen (SORC-C), Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Amager-Hvidovre Hospital, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Harald Talts
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Eva Ageberg
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Evans K, Ko J, Ceprnja D, Maka K, Beales D, Sterling M, Bennell KL, Jull G, Hodges PW, McKay MJ, Rebbeck TJ. Development and Implementation of MyPainHub, a Web-Based Resource for People With Musculoskeletal Conditions and Their Health Care Professionals: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Form Res 2025; 9:e63780. [PMID: 39993289 PMCID: PMC11894348 DOI: 10.2196/63780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2024] [Revised: 11/18/2024] [Accepted: 12/28/2024] [Indexed: 02/26/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Musculoskeletal conditions, including low back pain (LBP), neck pain, and knee osteoarthritis, are the greatest contributors to years lived with disability worldwide. Resources aiming to aid both patients and health care professionals (HCPs) exist but are poorly implemented and adopted. OBJECTIVE We aimed to develop and implement MyPainHub, an evidence-based web-based resource designed to provide comprehensive, credible and accessible information for people with, and HCPs who manage, common musculoskeletal conditions. METHODS This mixed methods study adhered to the New South Wales Translational Research Framework and was evaluated against the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Consultation with key stakeholders (patients, HCPs, researchers, industry, consumer groups, and website developers) informed content, design, features, and functionality. Development then aimed to meet the identified need for a "one-stop shop"-a central location for information about common musculoskeletal conditions tailored to a person's condition and risk of poor outcomes. MyPainHub was then developed through an iterative process and implementation strategies were tailored to different health care settings. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation occurred with patients and HCPs. RESULTS In total, 127 stakeholders participated in the development phase; initial consultation with them led to embedding 2 validated screening tools (the Short Form Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire and the Keele STarT MSK tool) in MyPainHub to guide information tailoring for patients based on risk of poor outcomes. Development occurred in parallel and feedback from stakeholders informed design and content including structure, functionality, and phrasing and images to use to emphasize key points. Consultation resulted in information for patients being categorized using key guideline-based messages (general information, your pathway, exercise, and imaging) while information for clinicians was categorized into assessment, management, and prognosis. Implementation occurred in different health care settings with the most effective strategies being interactive education via webinars and workshops. The evaluation phase involved web-based questionnaires (patients: n=44; HCPs: n=29) and focus groups (patients: n=6; HCPs: n=6). Patients and HCPs found MyPainHub user-friendly, acceptable, credible, and potentially able to support self-management. Patient participants identified areas for improvement such as including more specific information on preventative measures and pain relief options. Despite positive feedback, only 35% (10/29) of HCPs used MyPainHub with their patients. HCP participants identified challenges including insufficient training and lack of familiarity with using web-based resources in existing clinical workflows. Following implementation, the information contained on MyPainHub changed knowledge and practice for some patients and HCPs. CONCLUSIONS Following extensive and iterative stakeholder engagement, MyPainHub was developed as an evidence-based web-based resource and perceived by patients and HCPs as user-friendly, credible, and acceptable. Active implementation strategies are required for adoption and implementation and greater training focusing on strategies to implement MyPainHub into clinical practice may be necessary. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12619000871145; https://tinyurl.com/438kkyt3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerrie Evans
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Healthia Limited, Bowen Hills, Australia
| | | | | | - Katherine Maka
- Western Sydney Local Health District, Westmead, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Didyk C, Lewis LK, Lange B. Health professionals' use of smartphone apps for clients with low back pain: an observational study. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2025; 26:e14. [PMID: 39991859 PMCID: PMC11883799 DOI: 10.1017/s1463423625000209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 06/01/2024] [Accepted: 01/24/2025] [Indexed: 02/25/2025] Open
Abstract
AIM This study aimed to explore health professionals' use, barriers, confidence, and preferences for technology and smartphone apps to assist clients with self-managing low back pain (LBP). METHODS Prospective observational cross-sectional survey of registered Australian health professionals that managed clients with LBP. RESULTS In total, 52 survey responses were included (mean age 43 ±13.8 years). Most did not personally use healthy lifestyle apps (60%) and did not recommend apps due to a lack of knowledge of app effectiveness (93%). The largest barrier to recommending apps was the potential for apps to be misused as a substitute to health professional diagnosis. Fifteen recommended smartphone apps (mean age 36 ±10.6 years) and were at least moderately confident in choosing/recommending apps (94%) and assessing app quality (80%). Those more likely to recommend apps personally used apps for healthy lifestyle behaviours (odds ratio (OR) 5.1 (p = 0.009)) were physiotherapists (OR 0.13 (p = 0.035) c/f chiropractors in their profession for <10 years (OR 8.6 (p = 0.015)) c/f >30 years. Increasing age decreased the odds (OR 0.94 (p = 0.013)) of recommending apps. CONCLUSIONS Health professionals do not recommend LBP self-management apps due to a lack of knowledge of their effectiveness. Those that do recommend apps are confident with app choice, recommendation, and app quality assessment. Physiotherapists with <10 years' experience were most likely to recommend apps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Didyk
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Lucy Kate Lewis
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Belinda Lange
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Grant AR, Westhorp G, Mardon A, White M, Hibbert PD, Karran EL, Roeger C, Moseley GL. How Is Chronic Pain Managed in Rural Australia? A Qualitative Study Exploring Rural Healthcare Professional and Consumer Experiences. Aust J Rural Health 2025; 33:e70000. [PMID: 39927606 PMCID: PMC11809133 DOI: 10.1111/ajr.70000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2024] [Revised: 01/09/2025] [Accepted: 01/16/2025] [Indexed: 02/11/2025] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Guideline-based care for chronic pain is variably provided. Existing data on chronic pain management in Australia come primarily from metropolitan samples. As the initial investigations for a wider needs assessment, we sought to understand how chronic pain is managed in rural Australia, focused on investigating the gap between guideline-recommended care and provided care. METHODS We conducted semistructured interviews with rural healthcare professionals who treat patients with chronic pain and rural consumers affected by chronic pain. We asked healthcare professionals what treatments they deliver to patients with chronic pain. We asked consumers to describe the healthcare service providers they had accessed for pain care and the treatments they received from these providers. We utilised content analysis to gain an understanding of what care for chronic pain is being provided and compared these findings to guideline recommendations. RESULTS We interviewed 15 healthcare professionals and 27 consumers. Both healthcare professionas and consumers reported minimal use of most first-line management strategies. We also found differences between healthcare professional and consumer reports of pain care. Healthcare professionals frequently described delivering guideline-aligned pain care and consumers frequently described receiving care that contradicted guidelines. We identified challenges with rural access to pain care services, including minimal usage of telehealth services. CONCLUSIONS Given the identified gaps in care, future research may consider ways of improving rural access to pain care services, including investigating ways to increase uptake of telehealth services, and how to shift consumer expectations of pain care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley R. Grant
- IIMPACT in HealthUniversity of South Australia: Allied Health and Human PerformanceAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia
| | - Gill Westhorp
- Faculty of Arts and Society, RREALICharles Darwin University: Northern InstituteCasuarinaNorthern TerritoryAustralia
| | - Amelia Mardon
- IIMPACT in HealthUniversity of South Australia: Allied Health and Human PerformanceAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia
- NICM Health Research InstituteWestern Sydney UniversityWestmeadNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Monique White
- Independent Consumer ResearcherMurray BridgeSouth AustraliaAustralia
| | - Peter D. Hibbert
- IIMPACT in HealthUniversity of South Australia: Allied Health and Human PerformanceAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia
- Australian Institute of Health InnovationMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Emma L. Karran
- IIMPACT in HealthUniversity of South Australia: Allied Health and Human PerformanceAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia
| | | | - G. Lorimer Moseley
- IIMPACT in HealthUniversity of South Australia: Allied Health and Human PerformanceAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lluch-Girbés E, Dueñas L, Struyf F, Camerone EM, Rossettini G. Negative expectations and related nocebo effects in shoulder pain: a perspective for clinicians and researchers. Pain Manag 2025; 15:93-104. [PMID: 39973297 PMCID: PMC11853614 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2467022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2024] [Accepted: 02/11/2025] [Indexed: 02/21/2025] Open
Abstract
The nocebo effect, a phenomenon wherein negative expectations can worsen symptoms, is increasingly acknowledged within the context of musculoskeletal conditions. While experimental evidence has, to some extent, examined negative expectations in shoulder pain, their specific relationship with nocebo effects and their manifestation in clinical practice remains unexplored. In this perspective, clinicians and researchers are guided by first examining the psychobiology and neurophysiology underlying nocebo effects from a basic science standpoint, thereby equipping clinicians with a robust understanding of the phenomenon. What are considered the primary potential sources of nocebo effects in individuals with shoulder pain are then outlined - namely, diagnostic labels, diagnostic imaging and special tests, the medicalization of normality, and overtreatment. Practical clinical strategies are subsequently proposed to mitigate nocebo effects arising from these sources. Finally, the research implications for advancing the study of nocebo effects in people with shoulder pain are discussed. Overall, this perspective provides a comprehensive overview of the impact of negative expectations and associated nocebo effects on shoulder pain outcomes. By identifying potential sources of nocebo effects that may emerge in everyday clinical practice, guidance on mitigating related negative expectations in patients with shoulder pain is offered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrique Lluch-Girbés
- Physiotherapy in Motion, Multi-Speciality Research Group (PTinMOTION), Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lirios Dueñas
- Physiotherapy in Motion, Multi-Speciality Research Group (PTinMOTION), Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Filip Struyf
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | | | - Giacomo Rossettini
- School of Physiotherapy, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Villaviciosa de Odón, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mullen N, Ashby S, Haskins R, Osmotherly P. The prognostic reasoning by physiotherapists of musculoskeletal disorders: A phenomenological exploratory study. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2025; 75:103241. [PMID: 39637832 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2024] [Revised: 11/05/2024] [Accepted: 11/29/2024] [Indexed: 12/07/2024]
Abstract
QUESTION(S) What are the prognostic reasoning practices of physiotherapists towards musculoskeletal disorders? DESIGN Exploratory phenomenological study. PARTICIPANTS 15 physiotherapists who currently treat musculoskeletal disorders. DATE ANALYSIS Semi-structured interviews were implemented to collect data which was analysed using an inductive coding and thematic analysis approach. RESULTS Three themes were identified. First, how physiotherapists considered prognosis within clinical practice. Whilst prognosis is an important consideration, in some circumstances it either may not be considered or is implied. Second, how physiotherapists determine prognosis for musculoskeletal disorders. Several factors shaped the ability of physiotherapists to determine prognosis including how they determine prognosis, and the barriers and facilitators towards determining prognosis. Finally, how physiotherapists discuss prognosis with individuals who have a musculoskeletal disorder. These discussions were shaped by the prognostic information provided, as well as the barriers and facilitators towards discussing prognosis. CONCLUSION The prognostic reasoning of physiotherapists appears to be influenced initially by whether they consider it or not. It is then shaped by both barriers and facilitators towards determining and discussing prognosis. Facilitators for this prognostic reasoning process appear to be aligned with the biomedical model of health, whilst barriers more aligned with psychosocial factors. To improve prognostic reasoning, physiotherapists should continue to strive to conceptualize prognosis within a biopsychosocial framework. Doing so will improve the ability of physiotherapists to prognosticate, which will subsequently improve outcomes associated with musculoskeletal disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Mullen
- School of Health Sciences, The University of Newcastle, University Dr, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
| | - Samantha Ashby
- School of Health Sciences, The University of Newcastle, University Dr, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
| | - Robin Haskins
- John Hunter Hospital Outpatient Service, Hunter New England Health, Lookout Rd, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia.
| | - Peter Osmotherly
- School of Health Sciences, The University of Newcastle, University Dr, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wing T, Wright M, Chesterton P. Student and physiotherapists' perceived abilities to prescribe effective physical activity and exercise interventions: A cross-sectional survey. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2025; 75:103245. [PMID: 39708675 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2024] [Revised: 11/27/2024] [Accepted: 12/09/2024] [Indexed: 12/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Physical activity, aerobic and resistance training have established benefits to health and wellbeing, with physiotherapists playing a vital role in their promotion. OBJECTIVES To capture UK student and graduate physiotherapists (1) knowledge of accepted guidelines and, (2) perceptions of physical activity and exercise prescription in practice. DESIGN National cross-sectional online survey. METHODOLOGY A survey was conducted online among UK student and graduate physiotherapists from July to December 2021. Quantitative questions included dichotomous (yes/no), multiple-choice, and Likert scale (1-5) formats, alongside open-ended qualitative questions. RESULTS Of 305 respondents (18% students, 47% > 10 years' experience), 295 (97%) either "agreed" (n = 64, 21%) or "strongly agreed" (n = 231, 76%) that physical activity was a part of their role. Less than half felt the physiotherapy profession was able to provide effective physical activity (n = 149, 49%, 95% confidence intervals 43 to 54) and aerobic training (130, 43%, 37 to 48). Most knew the weekly minimum adult dosage of physical activity (257, 84%, 80 to 88) and resistance training (267, 88%, 83 to 91) but were generally unable to correctly identify aerobic and resistance training guidelines. Of those who used evidenced based guidelines regularly with patients 72% were not adopting correct guidelines for aerobic (n = 58, 72%, 61 to 80) and 46% for resistance training (n = 45, 46%, 36 to 56). Limited patient appointment duration, inadequate access to facilities and a lack of continuous professional development opportunities were perceived barriers to implementation. CONCLUSION Respondents agreed physical activity and exercise are vital treatment modalities, however many lack the knowledge to deliver these interventions in line with contemporary guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Wing
- Teesside Centre of Health and Performance Limited, United Kingdom; North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Wright
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Borough Road, Teesside University, Tees Valley, TS1 3BA, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Chesterton
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Borough Road, Teesside University, Tees Valley, TS1 3BA, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Campione E, Wampler M, Bolch CA, Krzak JJ. Barriers and facilitators to implementation of APTA's breast cancer-related lymphedema diagnosis and intervention clinical practice guidelines. J Cancer Surviv 2025; 19:397-406. [PMID: 37853271 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01475-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to identify barriers and facilitators influencing implementation of the diagnosis and intervention clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) related to the management of patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). METHODS A descriptive, cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted. Participants included physical therapists and assistants who were members of the APTA's Academy of Oncologic Physical Therapy and Lymphology Association of North America. Desriptive statisitcs were computed for all demographic and barriers and facilitators data. Individual exploratory factor analyses (EFA) were performed on survey items for both CPGs to identify themes of barriers and facilitators to implementation. RESULTS A total of 180 respondents completed the survey. 34.9% of respondents read the diagnosis CPG and 22.4% read the intervention CPG. A total of 77.8% reported that they did not have issues in changing their clinical routines and 69.5% did not have resistance working according to CPGs. The EFA resulted in 3 themes for each CPG, accounting for 46% of the variance for the diagnostic CPG and 54% of the variance for the intervention CPG. The 3 themes, clinician characteristics, patient demographics, therapist practice setting and beliefs/values, were weighted differently for each EFA. CONCLUSION Most respondents did not read either CPG, however, report a willingness to make changes to clinical practice and utilization of CPGs. For those who have attempted to implement the CPGs, this study was the first to identify the barriers and facilitators impacting the implementation of the CPGs related to the management of BCRL. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS The results will inform the development of targeted implementation strategies to improve access to and adherence to recommendations from the CPGs ultimately improving the efficiency and efficacy of care delivery to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Campione
- Physical Therapy Program, Midwestern University, Downers Grove, IL, USA.
| | - Meredith Wampler
- Program in Physical Therapy, Oregon State University - Cascades, Bend, OR, USA
| | - Charlotte A Bolch
- Office of Research and Sponsored Programs, Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ, USA
| | - Joseph J Krzak
- Physical Therapy Program, Midwestern University, Downers Grove, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Eiger B, Rathleff MS, Ickmans K, Rheel E, Straszek CL. Keeping It Simple-Pain Science Education for Patients with Chronic Pain Referred to Community-Based Rehabilitation: Translation, Adaptation, and Clinical Feasibility Testing of PNE4Adults. J Clin Med 2025; 14:771. [PMID: 39941443 PMCID: PMC11818698 DOI: 10.3390/jcm14030771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2024] [Revised: 01/16/2025] [Accepted: 01/21/2025] [Indexed: 02/16/2025] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Pain science education accommodating low health literacy is needed for people with chronic pain. The purpose of this study was to translate PNE4Kids, contextually adapt it into PNE4Adults, and test the feasibility of the newly developed pain science education program (PNE4Adults) for adult patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain in the municipality. Methods: A three-step approach was used to (1) translate PNE4Kids into Danish, (2) adapt to age and context (PNE4Adults), and (3) test the feasibility. (1) Translation was performed by a native Dane fluent in Dutch. (2) Two think-aloud group sessions were held, with therapists and end users. (3) Feasibility was tested amongst twenty adult patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain consecutively referred for rehabilitation in the municipality. The a priori success criteria were determined to be 70% acceptability and 70% understandability. Prior to inclusion of the first patient, the study was pre-registered on clinicaltrial.gov [NCT05140031]. Results: Translation was successfully performed. Both the therapist and end users found the program easy to grasp, the simplicity and interactive nature of the program ingenious, and the program to be well suited to an adult population. All patients (100%), across health literacy levels, found PNE4Adults comprehensible and acceptable. Conclusions: The aims were successfully met. Progression to a full trial is warranted and is underway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bettina Eiger
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, 9260 Gistrup, Denmark; (M.S.R.); (C.L.S.)
- Rehabilitation Center, Køge Municipality, Rådhusstræde 10C, 4600 Køge, Denmark
| | - Michael Skovdal Rathleff
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, 9260 Gistrup, Denmark; (M.S.R.); (C.L.S.)
- Center for General Practice at Aalborg University, Aalborg University, 9260 Gistrup, Denmark
| | - Kelly Ickmans
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium;
- Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Emma Rheel
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium;
- Research Foundation–Flanders, HOEK 38, Leuvenseweg 38, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Christian Lund Straszek
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, 9260 Gistrup, Denmark; (M.S.R.); (C.L.S.)
- Center for General Practice at Aalborg University, Aalborg University, 9260 Gistrup, Denmark
- Department of Physiotherapy, University College of Northern Denmark, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Thompson XD, DelBiondo GM, Hart JM. Clinician Knowledge of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Rehabilitation Practices: A Preliminary Survey Study. J Sport Rehabil 2025:1-10. [PMID: 39798555 DOI: 10.1123/jsr.2023-0413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Revised: 10/28/2024] [Accepted: 11/14/2024] [Indexed: 01/15/2025]
Abstract
CONTEXT After completing rehabilitation, patients face a high risk of subsequent injury following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. It is important to identify potential barriers to patient success including clinician knowledge. The purpose of this study was to assess clinician knowledge of research related to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction rehabilitation. DESIGN This was a survey study using snowball sampling. METHODS Survey development began with the creation of a construct map and contained varying levels of advanced concepts, level I indicating the most basic and level V the most complex. The survey was distributed to advertise to target population. A total of 60 participants (24 athletic trainers, 33 physical therapists, and 3 dual credentialed) completed the study. RESULTS Overall, participants displayed moderate to high levels of knowledge (79.7%-93.5% correct), apart from the implementation of motor learning principles. CONCLUSIONS Clinician knowledge may not be the primary barrier to patient success, but the implementation of this knowledge should be explored in relation to patient outcomes. Future research should examine a larger cohort to examine differences between clinician types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier D Thompson
- School of Kinesiology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
| | - Gabrielle M DelBiondo
- Department of Orthopedics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Joe M Hart
- Department of Orthopedics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kirker K, Masaracchio M, Dewan B, O'Connell M, Young B. Adherence to neck and low back pain clinical practice guidelines based on clinical specialization: a survey of physical therapists. J Man Manip Ther 2025:1-12. [PMID: 39792090 DOI: 10.1080/10669817.2025.2449977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2024] [Accepted: 12/28/2024] [Indexed: 01/12/2025] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate physical therapist adherence to the Academy of Orthopaedic Physical Therapy's (AOPT) clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the management of neck and low back pain (LBP) and to compare adherence among varying clinical specializations. DESIGN Electronic cross-sectional survey. METHODS The survey was sent to 17,348 AOPT members and 7,000 American Academy of Orthopaedic Manual Physical Therapists (AAOMPT) members. Participants selected the best diagnosis and intervention(s) for six case vignettes based on the current AOPT CPGs for neck and LBP. Diagnostic and intervention adherence rates were reported as total percentages and delineated by the highest level of clinical specialization - fellowship training (PTFs), orthopedic residency training (PTRs), Board Certified Clinical Specialist in Orthopaedic Physical Therapy (PTSs), orthopedic background without clinical specialization (PTOs). Binary logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the effects of clinical specialization (PTFs, PTRs, or PTSs) compared to PTOs on the likelihood of guideline adherence for all six cases. RESULTS Of the 159 participants who responded to the survey, 152 were eligible and 145 completed demographic data. Participant responses declined as the survey progressed from 125 completing case one to 106 completing case six. The odds ratio from binary logistic regression analyses were not significant for any specialization in all six cases (OR = 0.16; 95% CI: 0.02, 1.11; p = 0.064). CONCLUSIONS The results of this manuscript demonstrated variable adherence rates across subgroups of patients with neck and LBP with no significant association between clinical specialization and adherence. Adherence to CPGs is dependent on the clinical presentation of various patient cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlin Kirker
- Department of Physical Therapy, Long Island University, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | | | - Birendra Dewan
- Department of Physical Therapy, Long Island University, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Melanie O'Connell
- Department of Physical Therapy, Long Island University, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Brian Young
- Department of Physical Therapy, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Patel H, Shah S, V P. "Joint protection first": understanding physiotherapists' implementation of evidence-based interventions in osteoarthritis knee management-a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil 2025:1-8. [PMID: 39749669 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2447378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2024] [Revised: 12/20/2024] [Accepted: 12/22/2024] [Indexed: 01/04/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore the factors that influence physiotherapists' adherence to evidence-recommended interventions in the management of knee osteoarthritis. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using a qualitative descriptive design, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 physiotherapists across India. Participants were selected using purposive sampling to ensure diversity in experience and setting. We used inductive thematic analysis to explore emerging themes from the data, which were subsequently related to physiotherapists' adherence to evidence-recommended interventions in knee OA management. RESULTS We identified three main themes influencing physiotherapists' adherence to evidence-based care: biomechanical bias in decision-making, the influence of patient perceptions and preferences, and systemic challenges specific to healthcare settings. A significant biomechanical bias led to an emphasis on prioritizing joint protection strategies. Patient perceptions and demands, often influenced by trust in medical professionals over physiotherapists, pose significant challenges in aligning treatment with evidence-based practices. Systemic issues, including workload and infrastructural limitations, further complicate the delivery of effective OA care. CONCLUSION This study illustrates the multifaceted barriers to implementing evidence-based interventions for knee OA among Indian physiotherapists. Addressing these challenges through context-specific knowledge translation strategies is critical for advancing evidence-based, patient-centered OA knee management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hemali Patel
- Ashok & Rita Patel Institute of Physiotherapy, Charotar University of Science and Technology, Anand, Gujarat, India
| | - Sweni Shah
- Rita A Patel Institute of Physiotherapy, The Charutar Vidya Mandal (CVM) University, Anand, Gujarat, India
| | - Prakash V
- Department of Neurophysiotherapy, MGM Institute of Physiotherapy, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Chala MB, Elliott J, Baker GR, Walton DM, Steele M, Schabrun S. Integrated care for adults with chronic musculoskeletal disorders: a scoping review protocol. JBI Evid Synth 2025; 23:188-196. [PMID: 39285789 DOI: 10.11124/jbies-23-00534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this scoping review is to describe the current evidence exploring integrated care for people with chronic musculoskeletal disorders. INTRODUCTION The integrated model of care is an emerging approach to delivering person-centered care. Integrated care supports the management of people with major chronic health conditions; however, the evidence behind its use to support people with chronic musculoskeletal disorders is scant. This scoping review will synthesize how integrated care is conceptualized, delivered, and evaluated for people with chronic musculoskeletal disorders. The review will also synthesize the attributes, components, elements, goals, frequently evaluated outcomes, theories/frameworks, and facilitators and barriers to delivering this model among people with musculoskeletal disorders. INCLUSION CRITERIA Studies conducted on the delivery and/or evaluation of integrated care for people with chronic musculoskeletal disorders in any health care setting (eg, primary, secondary, tertiary) and/or geographical location (countries, cultures) will be considered. METHODS The review will follow the JBI scoping review methodology. Databases such as MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, Embase (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), the JBI EBP Database, PEDRO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Google Scholar, and Web of Science, as well as sources of gray literature, will be thoroughly searched. Papers published in all languages will be considered. Two reviewers will independently review the selected articles and extract data using a data extraction tool developed for this scoping review. The analysis will involve numerical and descriptive summaries of the selected articles and will be presented using graphs and tables, in line with Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mulugeta Bayisa Chala
- St. Joseph's Health Care London, London, ON, Canada
- The Gray Centre for Mobility and Activity, Parkwood Institute, London, ON, Canada
- Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada
| | - Jacobi Elliott
- St. Joseph's Health Care London, London, ON, Canada
- Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - G Ross Baker
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - David M Walton
- School of Physical Therapy, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | | | - Siobhan Schabrun
- St. Joseph's Health Care London, London, ON, Canada
- The Gray Centre for Mobility and Activity, Parkwood Institute, London, ON, Canada
- Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada
- School of Physical Therapy, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Furness J, Phillips J, Canetti E, Kemp-Smith K. Exploring mental health approaches and curriculum in physiotherapy: an Australasian perspective. Physiother Theory Pract 2025; 41:207-221. [PMID: 38368604 DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2024.2316308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Exposure to mental health problems are becoming increasingly more frequent within physiotherapy. Physiotherapists recognize the need for a biopsychosocial approach, however their knowledge, assessment, and treatment skills specific to mental health problems requires further research. PURPOSE To profile the level of education and perception of education that physiotherapists have acquired specific to mental health problems; and to profile an understanding of the current practice of physiotherapists specific to mental health problems. METHODS An online survey addressed the aims of the study and collected data from physiotherapists in Australia and New Zealand (open between 20th of October 2022 to the 20th of March 2023). RESULTS 139 respondents were included in the analysis. Physiotherapists had a perception that a significantly greater amount of coursework related to mental health needed to be included within their initial degree compared to what they received (mean difference of 20.0%, 95% CI: 17.5 to 22.5). This trend was evident irrespective of the degree level or the year of graduation. Higher perceived knowledge of anxiety (MD of 11.4, p = 0.001, ES: 0.5) and depression (MD of 11.8, p = 0.001, ES: 0.5) was evident in outpatient care physiotherapists. Lack of perceived knowledge is a reason for whether an assessment or treatment strategy is used with patients experiencing a mental health problem. Motivational interviewing and mindfulness were the most frequently used psychologically based techniques. CONCLUSION This study reveals the need to increase the amount of mental health and psychologically based techniques within Physiotherapy curriculum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Furness
- Faculty of Health Science and Medicine. Bond Institute of Health and Sport Bond University, Robina, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - J Phillips
- Faculty of Health Science and Medicine. Bond Institute of Health and Sport Bond University, Robina, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
- The Wesley Hospital, Uniting Care Health, Auchenflower, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - E Canetti
- Faculty of Health Science and Medicine. Bond Institute of Health and Sport Bond University, Robina, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - K Kemp-Smith
- Faculty of Health Science and Medicine. Bond Institute of Health and Sport Bond University, Robina, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hao J, Yao Z, Tang Y, Remis A, Wu K, Yu X. Artificial Intelligence in Physical Therapy: Evaluating ChatGPT's Role in Clinical Decision Support for Musculoskeletal Care. Ann Biomed Eng 2025; 53:9-13. [PMID: 39760952 DOI: 10.1007/s10439-025-03676-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2024] [Accepted: 12/31/2024] [Indexed: 01/07/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The integration of artificial intelligence into medicine has attracted increasing attention in recent years. ChatGPT has emerged as a promising tool for delivering evidence-based recommendations in various clinical domains. However, the application of ChatGPT to physical therapy for musculoskeletal conditions has yet to be investigated. METHODS Thirty clinical questions related to spinal, lower extremity, and upper extremity conditions were quired to ChatGPT-4. Responses were assessed for accuracy against clinical practice guidelines by two reviewers. Intra- and inter-rater reliability were measured using Fleiss' kappa (k). RESULTS ChatGPT's responses were consistent with CPG recommendations for 80% of the questions. Performance was highest for upper extremity conditions (100%) and lowest for spinal conditions (60%), with a moderate performance for lower extremity conditions (87%). Intra-rater reliability was good (k = 0.698 and k = 0.631 for the two reviewers), and inter-rater reliability was very good (k = 0.847). CONCLUSION ChatGPT demonstrates promise as a supplementary decision-making support tool for physical therapy, with good accuracy and reliability in aligning with clinical practice guideline recommendations. Further research is needed to evaluate its performance across broader scenarios and refine its clinical applicability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Hao
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Southeast Colorado Hospital, Springfield, CO, 81073, USA.
- Global Health Opportunities Program, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
| | - Zixuan Yao
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institution of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, 100051, People's Republic of China.
| | - Yaogeng Tang
- Program in Physical Therapy, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MI, USA
| | - Andréas Remis
- Duke Health Center Arringdon, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kangchao Wu
- School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Xin Yu
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Scaff SPS, Reis FJJ, Ferreira GE, Jacob MF, Saragiotto BT. Assessing the performance of AI chatbots in answering patients' common questions about low back pain. Ann Rheum Dis 2025; 84:143-149. [PMID: 39874229 DOI: 10.1136/ard-2024-226202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2024] [Accepted: 08/28/2024] [Indexed: 09/22/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy and readability of the answers generated by large language model (LLM)-chatbots to common patient questions about low back pain (LBP). METHODS This cross-sectional study analysed responses to 30 LBP-related questions, covering self-management, risk factors and treatment. The questions were developed by experienced clinicians and researchers and were piloted with a group of consumer representatives with lived experience of LBP. The inquiries were inputted in prompt form into ChatGPT 3.5, Bing, Bard (Gemini) and ChatGPT 4.0. Responses were evaluated in relation to their accuracy, readability and presence of disclaimers about health advice. The accuracy was assessed by comparing the recommendations generated with the main guidelines for LBP. The responses were analysed by two independent reviewers and classified as accurate, inaccurate or unclear. Readability was measured with the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES). RESULTS Out of 120 responses yielding 1069 recommendations, 55.8% were accurate, 42.1% inaccurate and 1.9% unclear. Treatment and self-management domains showed the highest accuracy while risk factors had the most inaccuracies. Overall, LLM-chatbots provided answers that were 'reasonably difficult' to read, with a mean (SD) FRES score of 50.94 (3.06). Disclaimer about health advice was present around 70%-100% of the responses produced. CONCLUSIONS The use of LLM-chatbots as tools for patient education and counselling in LBP shows promising but variable results. These chatbots generally provide moderately accurate recommendations. However, the accuracy may vary depending on the topic of each question. The reliability level of the answers was inadequate, potentially affecting the patient's ability to comprehend the information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone P S Scaff
- Masters and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
| | - Felipe J J Reis
- Physical Therapy Department, Instituto Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
| | - Giovanni E Ferreira
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. https://twitter.com/giovanni_ef
| | - Maria Fernanda Jacob
- Masters and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Bruno T Saragiotto
- Masters and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil; Discipline of Physiotherapy, Graduate School of Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Fritz J, Stridsberg SL, Holopainen R. Sustainable implementation efforts in physio- and occupational therapy: a scoping review. Implement Sci Commun 2024; 5:138. [PMID: 39668369 PMCID: PMC11636039 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-024-00676-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2024] [Accepted: 11/29/2024] [Indexed: 12/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health care professionals often fail to adhere to evidence-based guidelines. The implementation of evidence-based methods in health care requires systematic support, but it is still unclear which strategies support professional adherence to clinical practice guidelines. Behavior change techniques can contribute to a more detailed description of implementation strategies. The aim of this scoping review was to explore the nature of studies investigating the sustainability of physiotherapists' (PTs') and occupational therapists' (OTs') clinical behavior when implementing evidence-based methods in health care. Two research questions were addressed: (1) Which implementation strategies are used in studies that have experienced sustained and unsustained changes in the clinical behavior of PTs and OTs? (2) Which behavior change techniques are used in studies involving sustained and unsustained changes in the clinical behavior of PTs and OTs? METHODS The scoping review was carried out in accordance with recommendations and the PRISMA-ScR checklist. Six databases were searched. Studies evaluating changes in the clinical behavior of PTs or OTs before and at least 6 months after the end of an implementation intervention were included. RESULTS A total of 5130 studies were screened, and 29 studies were included. Twenty-one studies reported sustained results, and 8 studies reported unsustained results. The studies reporting sustained clinical behavior used in median 7 implementation strategies, 45% used a 12-24-month implementation support period, and 86% of the interventions were theory-based. Twenty-two implementation strategies were identified among the included studies. Only two of these defined the implementation strategies in terms of behavior change techniques. CONCLUSIONS Studies reporting sustained results were characterized by the use of longer implementation periods, more implementation strategies, more theory-based interventions, and more behavior change techniques. Audit and feedback, resources, problem solving, and communities of practice were implementation strategies, and problem solving, demonstration of behavior, and social support were behavior change techniques that were more common in studies with sustained results of PTs' and OTs' clinical behavior. Our study also highlights the importance of well-described implementation studies. REGISTRATION The protocol for the scoping review has been registered in the Open Science Framework, OSF registry ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/DUYQM ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Fritz
- School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Box 883, Västerås, SE-721 23, Sweden.
| | | | - Riikka Holopainen
- Faculty of Sports and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland
- Southern-Savo Healthcare District, Mikkeli, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Enthoven P, Menning L, Öberg B, Schröder K, Fors M, Lindbäck Y, Abbott A. Physiotherapists' experiences of implementation of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care - a focus group interview study. Physiother Theory Pract 2024; 40:2903-2915. [PMID: 38189338 DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2023.2301436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Revised: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The BetterBack model of care (MoC), a best practice physiotherapy MoC for low back pain (LBP), was implemented in Swedish primary care to improve management of patients with LBP and provide patients with support tools to better self-manage episodes of LBP. PURPOSE The objective was to describe how physiotherapists in primary care experienced the implementation of the BetterBack MoC for LBP. METHODS Focus group interviews were conducted with physiotherapists in 2018-2019, 14-18 months after the introduction of the BetterBack MoC. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS Five focus group interviews with 23 (15 female and 8 male) physiotherapists, age range 24-61 years were analyzed. A supportive organization and adaptation to the local culture, combined with health care professionals' attitudes and collaboration between physiotherapists emerged as important factors for a successful implementation and for long-term sustainability of the MoC. Physiotherapists had differing opinions if the implementation led to change in clinical practice. Improved confidence in how to manage patients with LBP was expressed by physiotherapists. CONCLUSIONS Several barriers and facilitators influence the implementation of a best practice physiotherapy MoC for LBP in primary care, which need to be considered in future implementation and sustainability processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Enthoven
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Linnea Menning
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Birgitta Öberg
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Karin Schröder
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Maria Fors
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Activity and Health, and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Yvonne Lindbäck
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Allan Abbott
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Orthopaedics, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Feldman R, Pincus T, Ben Ami N. 'A challenge to my professional identity'- resisting the shift from over-management to self-management for back pain within an implementation trial: a qualitative study. Physiotherapy 2024; 125:101424. [PMID: 39357271 DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2024.101424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2024] [Revised: 08/10/2024] [Accepted: 08/13/2024] [Indexed: 10/04/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Enhanced Transtheoretical Model Intervention (ETMI) is based on behavioral models and focuses on guiding Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) patients to self-manage symptoms and engage in recreational physical activity. While there is promising evidence that ETMI benefits patients, it is unclear how challenging it might be to implement widely. This investigation focused on the perceptions of physiotherapists trained to deliver ETMI for CLBP. DESIGN A Qualitative study comprised of semi-structured interviews (July to November 2023). Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed thematically by two independent researchers. SETTING Data were obtained as part of a large implementation study evaluating the uptake and impact of ETMI amongst physiotherapists in a large public healthcare setting. PARTICIPANTS 22 physiotherapists trained to deliver the ETMI approach and chose to use it with at least one patient. RESULTS While physiotherapists acknowledged the evidence base behind ETMI and the clarity of the approach, they struggled to adapt it to routine delivery. Exploration of the reasons for this identified an overarching meta-theme, 'A challenge to my professional identity', and three main themes consisting of 1) interventions such as ETMI contradicted my training. 2) I am ambivalent/ do not accept evidence that contradicts my habitual practice, and 3) I am under-skilled in psychological and communication skills. CONCLUSION This study highlights the reluctance of physiotherapists to implement evidence-based interventions such as ETMI, which fundamentally challenge their traditional practice and therapeutic identity. The shift from over-management by experts seeking cures to supporting self-management was not palatable to physiotherapists. The challenge of embracing a new professional identity must be addressed to enable a successful implementation of the approach. CONTRIBUTION OF THE PAPER.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ron Feldman
- Department of Physical Therapy, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel; Department of Physical Therapy, Maccabi Healthcare Services, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
| | - Tamar Pincus
- School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
| | - Noa Ben Ami
- Department of Physical Therapy, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Sia LL, Sharma S, Kumar S, Singh DKA. Physiotherapists' Perception of and Readiness to Use, Telerehabilitation for Musculoskeletal Disorders in Malaysia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Telemed J E Health 2024; 30:2842-2850. [PMID: 39119877 DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2024.0034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Musculoskeletal ailments exert a significant impact on global populations. To address challenges posed by geographical constraints and financial limitations, physiotherapists have explored and found telerehabilitation to be a viable solution. Despite its proven effectiveness in clinical practice, the integration of telerehabilitation has been sluggish. This cross-sectional survey sought to delve into the perspectives and readiness of physiotherapists in Malaysia regarding telerehabilitation for musculoskeletal disorders. Methods: A customized survey instrument was developed and evaluated for face validity and reliability. The 36-item questionnaire was distributed through the Google Form platform, targeting respondents via social media channels such as Facebook and WhatsApp. Data analysis used descriptive statistics (frequency and percentage). Results: The survey garnered responses from 271 physiotherapists. A majority (76.3%, n = 202) expressed agreement regarding the potential benefits of telerehabilitation in physiotherapy practice. About 77% of the respondents also showcased greater readiness for monitoring client progress through telerehabilitation as opposed to assessment and treatment. Notable benefits identified by respondents included preventing cross-infection (98.5%) and reducing travel time for both clients (94.0%) and physiotherapists (90.6%). Conclusion: The study reveals that physiotherapists in Malaysia exhibit positive attitudes and preparedness for implementing telerehabilitation in managing musculoskeletal conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lee Lee Sia
- Physiotherapy Program, Centre of Healthy Ageing & Wellness, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Physiotherapy Unit, Hospital Miri, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Miri, Malaysia
| | - Shobha Sharma
- Speech Sciences Program, Centre for Healthy Ageing & Wellness, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Saravana Kumar
- Allied Health and Human Performance Unit, University of South Australia (City East Campus), Adelaide, Australia
| | - Devinder Kaur Ajit Singh
- Physiotherapy Program, Centre of Healthy Ageing & Wellness, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Dubé MO, Langevin P, Massé-Alarie H, Esculier JF, Lachance A, Roy JS. Do patients' preferences and expectations match clinical guidelines? A survey of individuals seeking private primary care for a musculoskeletal disorder. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2024; 74:103195. [PMID: 39348727 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Revised: 09/03/2024] [Accepted: 09/25/2024] [Indexed: 10/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Physiotherapists often inconsistently adhere to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) when managing musculoskeletal disorders (MSKDs), potentially due to discrepancies between patient-valued interventions and guideline recommendations. Since patients' expectations are important predictors of outcome, this disparity between CPGs recommendations and patient preferences could be problematic for the effective care of MSKDs. OBJECTIVES To assess patients' expectations and preferences for the interventions used in their MSKD management and to establish correspondence rates between patients' preferences and recommendations from CPGs. DESIGN Survey. METHOD This cross-sectional descriptive study included a survey on sociodemographics, preferences, and expectations towards interventions for their MSKD, acceptable cost of care, number of treatment sessions required, and their involvement in their MSKD management. RESULTS One hundred and fifty participants (94 women and 56 men; mean age: 51 ± 17) responded to the survey. Eighty percent of respondents expected their involvement in their MSKD management to be equal to or superior than that of the physiotherapist. Sixty-nine percent of respondents expected to receive exercises, and 67% expected to receive education. Based on preference ratings, 95% of respondents chose recommended interventions, 57% chose interventions with uncertain levels of recommendation, and 48% chose interventions not recommended by CPGs. CONCLUSION Less than 70% of participants expected to receive education and exercises, the two most frequently recommended interventions by CPGs. On the other hand, the majority of respondents indicated that their involvement should be equal to or superior than that of the physiotherapist. This aligns with CPGs, which advocate for active and self-management strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc-Olivier Dubé
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Center, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Pierre Langevin
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; Clinique Cortex and Physio Interactive, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Hugo Massé-Alarie
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jean-Francois Esculier
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; The Running Clinic, Lac Beauport, Quebec, Canada; MoveMed Physiotherapy, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Anthony Lachance
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jean-Sébastien Roy
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Beales D, Boyle E, Fary R, Mikhailov A, Saunders B, Coates S, Evans K, Simic M, Sterling M, Bennell K, Rebbeck T. Patient acceptance of care of a novel care pathway for those at risk of poor outcomes from musculoskeletal pain: A mixed methods study. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2024; 74:103178. [PMID: 39270531 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2024] [Revised: 08/11/2024] [Accepted: 09/05/2024] [Indexed: 09/15/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Investigate people's acceptance of specialist musculoskeletal care within a new care pathway for common musculoskeletal conditions (low back pain, neck pain/whiplash, knee osteoarthritis). DESIGN Convergent parallel mixed methods design referencing the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. The study included a subset of participants (n = 29) at-risk of poor outcomes from the intervention arm of the PAthway of CarE for common musculoskeletal conditions (PACE-MSK) trial. In the PACE-MSK arm, participants received specialist physiotherapist care as an adjunct to the care provided by their primary healthcare professional(s). One-to-one semi-structured interviews were conducted around 3-months after commencing in the trial. Quantitative data were collected at baseline and 3-month follow-up (health-related quality of life, pain self-efficacy, global perceived change, satisfaction). RESULTS Five themes were identified (Expectations and beliefs shaped patient experience; Clinical expertise and competence influence acceptance; Person-centred care; Mechanisms facilitating beneficial responses to care; Gaps in care pathway implementation). There were positive individual changes in physical quality of life for 17/29 (59%) participants, mental health quality of life for 12/29 (41%), pain self-efficacy for 8/29 (28%) and global perceived change for 19/29 (66%). Management met expectations with the majority reporting high levels of satisfaction. Integrating the qualitative and quantitative data with the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability, there were complementary meta-inferences in the constructs of 'ethicality', 'intervention coherence', 'self-efficacy' and 'affective attitude'. Divergence was identified in 'perceived effectiveness'. DISCUSSION In general, there was positive acceptance of the care pathway by participants. Specialist physiotherapists' care was perceived as a positive addition to usual care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren Beales
- Curtin EnAble Institute and Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia, Australia, 6845. https://twitter.com/DBealesPhysio
| | - Eileen Boyle
- Curtin EnAble Institute and Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia, Australia, 6845.
| | - Robyn Fary
- Curtin EnAble Institute and Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia, Australia, 6845.
| | - Anton Mikhailov
- Curtin EnAble Institute and Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia, Australia, 6845.
| | - Benjamin Saunders
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, United Kingdom.
| | - Sonia Coates
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Susan Wakil Health Building, Western Ave, Sydney, New South Wales, 2006, Australia; School of Allied Health, Australian Catholic University, 33 Berry Street, North Sydney, New South Wales, 2060, Australia.
| | - Kerrie Evans
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Susan Wakil Health Building, Western Ave, Sydney, New South Wales, 2006, Australia; Healthia Limited, Brisbane, Queensland, 4006, Australia.
| | - Milena Simic
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Susan Wakil Health Building, Western Ave, Sydney, New South Wales, 2006, Australia.
| | - Michele Sterling
- RECOVER Injury Research Centre, NHMR CRE: Better Health Outcomes for Compensable Injuries University of Queensland, Level 7 STARS Building, Herston Road, Herston, 4006, Australia.
| | - Kim Bennell
- Centre for Health, Exercise & Sports Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Alan Gilbert Building, 161 Barry Street, Carlton, Victoria, 3053, Australia.
| | - Trudy Rebbeck
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Susan Wakil Health Building, Western Ave, Sydney, New South Wales, 2006, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bahns C, Scheffler B, Bremer A, Kopkow C. Measuring guideline adherence in physiotherapy: A scoping review of methodological approaches. J Eval Clin Pract 2024. [PMID: 39462990 DOI: 10.1111/jep.14218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2024] [Revised: 10/10/2024] [Accepted: 10/14/2024] [Indexed: 10/29/2024]
Abstract
RATIONALE Clinical practice guidelines summarise the existing evidence on specific health conditions and aim to optimise quality of care by providing evidence-based recommendations. Studies have reported a gap between research findings and clinical practice in physiotherapy. Guideline adherence is often used as a measure of agreement between therapeutic care and guideline recommendations. However, there is currently no standardised methodological approach for measuring guideline adherence. AIMS AND OBJECTIVE The objective of this scoping review was to summarise the methods and results of studies that assessed guideline adherence in physiotherapy. METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE, PEDro and CENTRAL databases were searched for relevant literature up to December 2022. Published reports of observational studies and controlled clinical trials that provided information on the assessment of guideline adherence in physiotherapists were included. The selection process was performed independently by two reviewers. The methodological quality of the identified reports was not assessed. Results were summarised narratively. RESULTS From a total of 2560 potentially relevant records, 53 reports were included in the analysis. Physiotherapists' adherence to guidelines was primarily assessed in the context of musculoskeletal conditions, such as low back pain (n = 25, 47.2%) and osteoarthritis (n = 8, 15.1%). A wide range of measurement approaches were used with the majority of reports using web-based surveys (n = 21, 39.6%), followed by chart reviews (n = 17, 32.1%). Most reports (n = 21, 39.6%) provided information on the level of adherence in terms of frequency dichotomising (self-reported) clinical practice as adherent or non-adherent. Adherence rates varied widely between included reports. CONCLUSIONS Although the large number of included reports indicates a high level of interest in the topic of guideline adherence, there is considerable heterogeneity between studies regarding the methodological approaches used to assess guideline adherence in physiotherapists. This reduces the comparability of the study results. TRIAL REGISTRATION INPLASY (registration no. 202250081). Registered on 12th May 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolin Bahns
- Department of Therapy Science I, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Senftenberg, Germany
| | - Bettina Scheffler
- Department of Therapy Science I, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Senftenberg, Germany
| | - Alexander Bremer
- Department of Therapy Science I, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Senftenberg, Germany
| | - Christian Kopkow
- Department of Therapy Science I, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Senftenberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Bahns C, Happe L, Kopkow C. Barriers and facilitators to the use of clinical practice guidelines in osteoarthritis care: a qualitative study among German physiotherapists. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e085349. [PMID: 39424395 PMCID: PMC11492947 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 10/02/2024] [Indexed: 10/21/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to explore barriers and facilitators to the use of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in osteoarthritis (OA) care among German physiotherapists. DESIGN Qualitative semistructured interviews were conducted with German physiotherapists. An interview topic guide based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was developed to explore perceived barriers and facilitators to the use of CPGs in OA care. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. In a first step, the data were coded inductively using thematic analysis. Subsequently, the emerged themes were deductively reassigned to the relevant domains of the TDF and categorised as barriers and facilitators. SETTING Outpatient physiotherapy practices in Germany. PARTICIPANTS Physiotherapists working in an outpatient setting in Germany and involved in the management of patients with hip and knee OA were eligible to participate. RESULTS Eleven physiotherapists (7 women, 4 men) were interviewed between February and September 2023. The mean age was 34.2 years (± 9.9, range 23-57). Most factors influencing guideline-recommended care were identified in the TDF domains 'knowledge', 'beliefs about consequences', 'environmental context and resources' and 'social influences'. For example, physiotherapists perceived low awareness of existing CPGs, loss of individuality in treatment, time constraints and dissonant patient expectations as barriers to the use of CPGs. Discussion of guideline recommendations within the team and the expectation of improved patient outcomes and resource savings were reported as facilitators. CONCLUSIONS Multiple factors were identified that were perceived to influence clinical practice in Germany. The results of this study can inform the development of theory-based interventions aimed at changing physiotherapists' behaviour to support them in providing optimal OA care. TRIAL REGISTRATION German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00030800). Registered 12 December 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolin Bahns
- Department of Therapy Science I, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Senftenberg, Germany
| | - Lisa Happe
- Department of Health Services Research, Junior Research Group „Nutrition and Physical Function in Older Adults“, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Christian Kopkow
- Department of Therapy Science I, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Senftenberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Mullen N, Ashby S, Haskins R, Osmotherly P. The perceptions and knowledge of prognosis of physiotherapists in musculoskeletal practice: An exploratory qualitative study. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2024; 73:103142. [PMID: 38991615 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2024] [Revised: 07/04/2024] [Accepted: 07/07/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
QUESTION(S) What are the perceptions and knowledge of physiotherapists who treat musculoskeletal disorders towards prognosis? DESIGN Exploratory phenomenological study. PARTICIPANTS 15 physiotherapists involved in the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders. DATA ANALYSIS Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analysed using inductive coding and thematic analysis. RESULTS Four themes were identified. First, participants perception of prognosis was influenced by how they defined prognosis. Participants often perceived that prognosis was the timeline to recovery related to function, tissue health, or pain. Second, some participants could not recall foundational knowledge about prognosis being taught during their entry-level physiotherapy program. Others recalled it being taught in relation to the tissue healing model. Third, participants described learning about prognosis through experience, professional development, or from peers. Finally, participants identified that a potential learning opportunity is to conceptualise prognosis as separate outcomes associated with function, tissue health, and pain. Each can impact upon prognosis, have a prognosis of their own, and can occur simultaneously. CONCLUSION How physiotherapists perceive and understand the concept of prognosis is influenced by their foundational knowledge. It appears for physiotherapists, prognosis may be conceptualised within the biomedical model of health. Indeed, physiotherapists may perceive that prognosis is the timeline for recovery determined by the tissue model of healing. Physiotherapists also rely on experiential knowledge gained from clinical practice, professional development, and their peers to enhance learning about prognosis. The understanding of prognosis may be enhanced if physiotherapists conceptualise prognosis in terms of the multifactorial outcomes associated with function, tissue health, and pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Mullen
- School of Health Sciences, The University of Newcastle, University Dr, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
| | - Samantha Ashby
- School of Health Sciences, The University of Newcastle, University Dr, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
| | - Robin Haskins
- John Hunter Hospital Outpatient Service, Hunter New England Health, Lookout Rd, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia.
| | - Peter Osmotherly
- School of Health Sciences, The University of Newcastle, University Dr, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Grenier JP, Rothmund M. A critical review of the role of manual therapy in the treatment of individuals with low back pain. J Man Manip Ther 2024; 32:464-477. [PMID: 38381584 PMCID: PMC11421166 DOI: 10.1080/10669817.2024.2316393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
The number of low back pain (LBP) cases is projected to increase to more than 800 million by 2050. To address the substantial burden of disease associated with this rise in prevalence, effective treatments are needed. While clinical practice guidelines (CPG) consistently recommend non-pharmacological therapies as first-line treatments, recommendations regarding manual therapy (MT) in treating low back pain vary. The goal of this narrative review was to critically summarize the available evidence for MT behind these recommendations, to scrutinize its mechanisms of action, and propose some actionable steps for clinicians on how this knowledge can be integrated into a person-centered approach. Despite disparate recommendations from CPG, MT is as effective as other available treatments and may be offered to patients with LBP, especially as part of a treatment package with exercise and education. Most of the effects of MT are not specific to the technique. MT and other interventions share several mechanisms of action that mediate treatment success. These mechanisms can encompass patients' expectations, prior experiences, beliefs and convictions, epistemic trust, and nonspecific contextual effects. Although MT is safer than opioids for patients with LBP, this alone is insufficient. Our goal is to encourage clinicians to shift away from outdated and refuted ideas in MT and embrace a person-centered approach rooted in a comprehensive biopsychosocial framework while incorporating patients' beliefs, addressing illness behaviors, and seeking to understand each patient's journey.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Pascal Grenier
- Department of Physiotherapy, Health University of Applied Sciences Tyrol, Innsbruck, Austria
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Clinic Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Maria Rothmund
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics, and Medical Psychology, University Clinic for Psychiatry II, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Bogaert L, Brumagne S, Léonard C, Lauwers A, Peters S. Physiotherapist- and patient-reported barriers to guideline implementation of active physiotherapeutic management of low back pain: A theory-informed qualitative study. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2024; 73:103129. [PMID: 38943770 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2024] [Revised: 05/30/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Adoption of low back pain (LBP) guidelines in physiotherapeutic management is a well-documented problem. Thereby, an in-depth understanding of the barriers to implement an active approach for both patients and physiotherapists is needed. DESIGN Semi-structured interviews were conducted with physiotherapists and patients with non-specific LBP. Interviews, guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), were analyzed using the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven. RESULTS A total of 20 participants were interviewed, including ten physiotherapists and ten patients. Our findings reveal that patients and physiotherapists face each 23 barriers spanning 14 TDF domains. The TDF domain "social influences" revealed the most barriers, followed by "beliefs about consequences" and "environmental context" for patients and physiotherapists, respectively. Five barriers did overlap between both groups (lack of guideline awareness, incorrect exercise performance, interdisciplinary communication gaps, time constraints and challenges in patient compliance). CONCLUSIONS Barriers to LBP guideline recommended physiotherapeutic practices span all 14 TDF domains. Consequently, future implementation interventions need to address multiple TDF domains for effective LBP guideline implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liedewij Bogaert
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; REVAL Rehabilitation Research, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
| | - Simon Brumagne
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Amber Lauwers
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sanne Peters
- School of Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Monteiro NRO, dos Anjos GCS, Nunes Pinto ACP, Matos AP. Global mapping survey research on physiotherapeutic interventions for osteoarthritis: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e087778. [PMID: 39353697 PMCID: PMC11448107 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2024] [Accepted: 09/11/2024] [Indexed: 10/04/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Physiotherapists provide non-pharmacological conservative treatment for osteoarthritis (OA) using a wide spectrum of interventions. Previous surveys have identified global physiotherapy OA management practices. However, no review to date summarises the scope and findings of these studies. This article describes a scoping review protocol to map the surveys investigating physiotherapeutic interventions offered to patients with OA to identify the treatment interventions currently used for OA, the physiotherapists' attributes and organisational practice factors potentially associated with the choice of these interventions and to detect knowledge-practice gaps in the provision of physiotherapeutic interventions in OA treatment, contributing to guiding future research on this topic. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a protocol for a scoping review that will be based on Arksey and O'Malley scoping review methodology and the methodological guidance for conducting scoping reviews published by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). Relevant articles will be searched using the following databases: Medline (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Surveys studies addressing physiotherapeutic interventions offered to patients with OA will be included. Study will be selected through title/abstract and full-text screening stages and data will be extracted using an instrument based on the model available in the JBI Manual. The findings will be summarised using descriptive statistics according to our research questions. This review will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval is not required for this scoping review. Review findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, scientific conference presentations and scientific meetings. STUDY REGISTRATION This protocol has been registered with the Open Science Framework (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/J3RBT).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Areolino Pena Matos
- Faculty of Ocupational and Physical Therapy, Federal University of Pará and Postgraduate Program of Health Sciences, Federal University of Amapa, Macapa, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Di Donato M, Sheehan LR, Iles R, Gray S, Buchbinder R, Collie A. Patterns of physiotherapy attendance in compensated Australian workers with low back pain: a retrospective cohort study. Pain 2024; 165:2305-2312. [PMID: 38563989 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Workers with low back pain (LBP) frequently seek care from physiotherapists. We sought to identify patterns of physiotherapy attendance and factors associated with these patterns in Australian workers with accepted compensation claims for LBP. We included workers with accepted workers' compensation claims for LBP from 4 Australian states between 2011 and 2015. We used trajectory modelling to identify distinct groups of workers based on the number (ie, volume) of monthly physiotherapy attendances over a 2-year period from claim acceptance. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models were used to compare the characteristics of the groups. A small but significant proportion attend numerous times over a long period. 79.0% of the sample (N = 22,767) attended physiotherapy at least once in the 2 years after claim acceptance. Among these, trajectory modelling identified 4 distinct patterns of attendance. Most (N = 11,808, 51.9%) recorded a short-term low-volume pattern, 26.8% (n = 6089) recorded a short-term high-volume pattern, 14.3% (n = 3255) recorded a long-term low-volume pattern, and 7.1% (n = 1615) recorded a long-term high-volume pattern. Workers from Victoria (OR 0.34, 99% CI 0.31, 0.37), South Australia (OR 0.69, 99% CI 0.60, 0.80), and Western Australia (OR 0.79, 99% CI 0.69, 0.88) were significantly less likely to attend physiotherapy than workers from Queensland. Victorian workers were significantly more likely to be in one of the 2 long-term trajectory groups (OR 8.17, 99% CI 6.86, 9.73; OR 18.68, 99% CI 13.57, 25.70). In conclusion, most compensated Australian workers with LBP attend physiotherapy. Significant interjurisdictional differences between attendance patterns suggests that policy may play an important role in healthcare delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Di Donato
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Elser A, Kopkow C, Schäfer AG. Implementation of a Virtual Reality Intervention in Outpatient Physiotherapy for Chronic Pain: Protocol for a Pilot Implementation Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2024; 13:e58089. [PMID: 39312768 PMCID: PMC11459105 DOI: 10.2196/58089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2024] [Revised: 07/11/2024] [Accepted: 07/25/2024] [Indexed: 09/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic pain is a global health issue that causes physical, psychological, and social disabilities for patients, as well as high costs for societies. Virtual reality (VR) is a new treatment that provides an opportunity to narrow the gap between clinical practice and recommended care in the use of patient education and behavioral interventions in the outpatient physiotherapy setting. However, there is currently no implementation strategy to integrate VR treatments into this setting. OBJECTIVE This protocol outlines a pilot implementation study that aims to (1) identify barriers and facilitators for implementing a VR intervention in outpatient physiotherapy care for people with chronic pain and (2) develop and pilot test an implementation strategy in 5 practices in Germany. METHODS The study consists of 4 phases. The first phase involves adapting the treatment protocol of the VR intervention to the local context of outpatient physiotherapy practices in Germany. The second phase includes the collection of barriers and facilitators through semistructured interviews from physiotherapists and the development of a theory-driven implementation strategy based on the Theoretical Domains framework and the Behavior Change Wheel. This strategy will be applied in the third phase, which will also include a 6-month span of using VR interventions in practices, along with a process evaluation. The fourth phase consists of semistructured interviews to evaluate the developed implementation strategy. RESULTS The recruitment process and phase 1, including the adaptation of the treatment protocol, have already been completed. We recruited 5 physiotherapy practices in Lower Saxony, Germany, where the VR intervention will be implemented. The collection of barriers and facilitators through semistructured interviews is scheduled to begin in February 2024. CONCLUSIONS This pilot implementation study aims to develop a theory-driven implementation strategy for integrating a VR intervention into outpatient physiotherapy care for people with chronic pain. The identified barriers and facilitators, along with the implementation strategy, will serve as a starting point for future randomized controlled implementation studies in different settings to refine the implementation process and integrate VR interventions into the outpatient care of people with chronic pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00030862; https://tinyurl.com/3zf7uujx. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/58089.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Elser
- Faculty of Social Work and Health, HAWK University of Applied Sciences and Arts Hildesheim/Holzminden/Göttingen, Hildesheim, Germany
| | - Christian Kopkow
- Faculty 4 for Human Sciences, Department Therapy Science I, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus - Senftenberg, Cottbus - Senftenberg, Germany
| | - Axel Georg Schäfer
- Faculty of Social Work and Health, HAWK University of Applied Sciences and Arts Hildesheim/Holzminden/Göttingen, Hildesheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Aljohani MMA, Awali A, Aljohani RK, Aljehani MS, Alshehri YS. Survey of Confidence and Knowledge in Managing Patellofemoral Pain among Physical Therapists in Saudi Arabia. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:1891. [PMID: 39337232 PMCID: PMC11431332 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12181891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2024] [Revised: 09/02/2024] [Accepted: 09/09/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study assessed the beliefs and knowledge of physical therapists in Saudi Arabia regarding the management of patellofemoral pain (PFP) and their alignment with current Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs). METHODS A cross-sectional survey was conducted, involving 111 licensed physical therapists actively treating PFP patients. The survey included questions about PFP risk factors, prognosis, diagnosis, and treatment, using a Likert scale to measure confidence and knowledge. RESULTS Readers have significantly greater confidence in the knowledge of managing patients with PFP following current CPGs (p < 0.01). No significant differences were observed between groups in the other items (p > 0.01). However, over 70% of respondents, irrespective of guideline familiarity, held beliefs about risk factors, prognosis, diagnosis, and treatment that were inconsistent with CPGs. CONCLUSIONS These discrepancies highlight a significant knowledge gap that may affect patient care quality. Enhancing education and dissemination efforts regarding CPGs is essential to improve adherence to evidence-based practices among physical therapists in Saudi Arabia. To change practitioners' preferences, attitudes, and beliefs, more targeted programs and interventions for knowledge dissemination and implementation should be provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marwan M. A. Aljohani
- Department of Physical Therapy, College of Medical Rehabilitation Sciences, Taibah University, Medina 42353, Saudi Arabia;
| | - Abdulaziz Awali
- Department of Medical Rehabilitation Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia; (A.A.); (M.S.A.)
| | - Raghad Khalid Aljohani
- Department of Physical Therapy, King Salman Medical City, Ministry of Health, Medina 42319, Saudi Arabia;
| | - Moiyad Saleh Aljehani
- Department of Medical Rehabilitation Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia; (A.A.); (M.S.A.)
| | - Yasir S. Alshehri
- Department of Physical Therapy, College of Medical Rehabilitation Sciences, Taibah University, Medina 42353, Saudi Arabia;
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Lalji R, Muñoz Laguna J, Kauth J, Hofstetter L, Kurmann A, Adams J, Kongsted A, von Wyl V, Puhan MA, Hincapié CA. What Gets Measured Gets Managed: A Scoping Review of Musculoskeletal Research Conducted Within Practice-Based Research Networks. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2024; 103:e113-e121. [PMID: 38682899 DOI: 10.1097/phm.0000000000002485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Musculoskeletal conditions are often managed in primary care settings. To facilitate research and healthcare quality, practice-based research networks offer sustained collaborations between clinicians and researchers. A scoping review was conducted to describe characteristics of practice-based research networks used for musculoskeletal research and musculoskeletal research conducted through practice-based research networks. Practice-based research networks were identified from 1) musculoskeletal-studies identified in OVID Medline, CINAHL, and Embase databases from inception to 5 February 2023 and in ClinicalTrials.gov and 2) from practice-based research network registries and websites. Among active musculoskeletal-focused practice-based research networks (i.e., currently recruiting and conducting research), an assessment of practice-based research network research good practices was performed. After screening 3025 records, 85 studies from 46 unique practice-based research networks met our eligibility criteria. Common conditions studied were low back pain (28%), musculoskeletal conditions not otherwise specified (25%), and osteoarthritis (19%). Thirty-two practice-based research networks (70%) were deemed to be active. Among active musculoskeletal-focused practice-based research networks, best practice data management information was retrievable for most (53%). Because of the scarcity of publicly available information, a large proportion of practice-based research network research good practice items was not assessable. Practice-based research networks have provided an avenue to assess clinical practice and patient outcomes related to musculoskeletal conditions. Further work to increase the transparency of musculoskeletal practice-based research network research practices is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahim Lalji
- From the EBPI-UWZH Musculoskeletal Epidemiology Research Group, University of Zurich and Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland (RL, JML, LH, AK, CAH); Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute (EBPI), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (RL, JML, LH, VvW, MAP, CAH); University Spine Centre Zurich (UWZH), Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland (RL, JML, LH, CAH); Department of Chiropractic Medicine, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland (JK); Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia (JA); Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark (AK); Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Odense, Denmark (AK); and Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (VvW)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ribeiro H, Cruz EB, Castro A, Rodrigues A, Heleno B, Dias TL, Pires D. Cross-cultural adaptation and reliability of the European Portuguese version of the Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire: A methodological study. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0308623. [PMID: 39116051 PMCID: PMC11309473 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2024] [Accepted: 07/26/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To culturally adapt the Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ) to European Portuguese and evaluate its reliability in individuals with musculoskeletal conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study was carried out in two phases. In the first phase, the MSK-HQ was translated and culturally adapted. In the second phase, a longitudinal observational study was carried out with a convenience sample of participants with musculoskeletal conditions. Data collection began at the start of physiotherapy treatments by filling in the MSK-HQ and Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). After 4-7 days, the participants were asked to fill out the MSK-HQ once again, as well as the Patient Global Improvement Change (PGIC) scale. The data collected was used to study internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and measurement error. Floor and ceiling effects were also analysed. RESULTS The MSK-HQ was successfully translated and adapted into European Portuguese. The second phase of the study had a sample of 191 participants. This study demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.885) and excellent test-retest reliability (ICC(2,1) = 0.908). The analysis of measurement error resulted in an SEM of 2.818 and an SDC at 7.811. No floor or ceiling effect was observed. CONCLUSIONS The MSK-HQ-PT is a reliable instrument for measuring musculoskeletal health. Further studies on its validity and responsiveness are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hermínia Ribeiro
- Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal, Escola Superior de Saúde, Setúbal, Portugal
| | - Eduardo Brazete Cruz
- Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal, Escola Superior de Saúde, Setúbal, Portugal
- Comprehensive Health Research Centre, NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Ana Castro
- Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal, Escola Superior de Saúde, Setúbal, Portugal
- Centro de Linguística da Universidade NOVA de Lisboa (CLUNL), Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Ana Rodrigues
- Comprehensive Health Research Centre, NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
- EpiDoC Unit, NOVA Medical School, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
- Unidade de Reumatologia, Hospital dos Lusíadas, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Bruno Heleno
- Comprehensive Health Research Centre, NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
- NOVA Medical School, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Teresa L. Dias
- Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal, Escola Superior de Saúde, Setúbal, Portugal
| | - Diogo Pires
- Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal, Escola Superior de Saúde, Setúbal, Portugal
- Comprehensive Health Research Centre, NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ferrández-Gómez JÉ, Gacto-Sánchez M, Nouni-García R, Gascón-Jaén J, Lozano-Quijada C, Baño-Alcaraz A. Physiotherapists' adherence to Clinical Practice Guidelines in fibromyalgia: a cross-sectional online survey. Rheumatol Int 2024; 44:1509-1520. [PMID: 38839659 PMCID: PMC11222258 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-024-05630-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
To evaluate the level of knowledge and adherence to Clinical Practice Guidelines on fibromyalgia of physiotherapists in Spain. A cross-sectional study using an ad-hoc online survey was implemented to assess aspects on the assessment, treatment, and decision of the length of the therapeutic approach on fibromyalgia. Based on the results, professionals were classified as adherent, partially adherent, or non-adherent. The level of agreement with several statements on the condition was also evaluated across the professionals surveyed to evaluate the potential consensus. A total of 240 physiotherapists met inclusion criteria, amongst which 68 (28.33%) were adherent. The academic level of studies (Chi-square = 48.601, p-value = 0.001) and having had previous training in fibromyalgia (Chi-square = 151.011, p-value = 0.001) displayed statistically significant differences across adherence-based groups. Consensus was reached for 15 out of 24 statements. Our findings highlight the presence of an acceptable level of knowledge and adherence to clinical practice guidelines in the field of fibromyalgia among physiotherapists in Spain.Practice implicationsOur results also reveal the existence of an evidence-to-practice gap in the field, with potential room for improvement: further efforts on promoting and reinforcing the importance of evidence-based therapies are needed, from university teaching plans to clinical updates for daily practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Édgar Ferrández-Gómez
- Physiotherapy Area, Pathology and Surgery Department, School of Medicine, University of Miguel Hernández de Elche, Ctra, Nacional N-332 s/n, 03550, San Juan de Alicante, Spain
- Faculty of Physiotherapy, Occupational Therapy and Podiatry, UCAM Catholic University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - Mariano Gacto-Sánchez
- Department of Physical Therapy, Campus of Health Sciences, University of Murcia, Av. Buenavista, 32 El Palmar, 30120, Murcia, Spain.
| | - Rauf Nouni-García
- Physiotherapy Area, Pathology and Surgery Department, School of Medicine, University of Miguel Hernández de Elche, Ctra, Nacional N-332 s/n, 03550, San Juan de Alicante, Spain
- Diagnostic Center, Institute of Health and Biomedical Research of Alicante, General University Hospital of Alicante, Fifth Floor, Pintor Baeza Street, 12, 03110, Alicante, Spain
- Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), 03550, San Juan de Alicante, Spain
| | - Jaime Gascón-Jaén
- Physiotherapy Area, Pathology and Surgery Department, School of Medicine, University of Miguel Hernández de Elche, Ctra, Nacional N-332 s/n, 03550, San Juan de Alicante, Spain
| | - Carlos Lozano-Quijada
- Department of Pathology and Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Center for Translational Research in Physiotherapy, Miguel Hernandez University, Ctra. Alicante-Valencia Km. 8,7-N 332, 03550, Alicante, Spain
| | - Aitor Baño-Alcaraz
- Department of Physical Therapy, Campus of Health Sciences, University of Murcia, Av. Buenavista, 32 El Palmar, 30120, Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Campbell L, Quicke J, Stevenson K, Paskins Z, Dziedzic K, Swaithes L. Using Twitter (X) to Mobilize Knowledge for First Contact Physiotherapists: Qualitative Study. J Med Internet Res 2024; 26:e55680. [PMID: 38742615 PMCID: PMC11263900 DOI: 10.2196/55680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Revised: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Twitter (now X) is a digital social network commonly used by health care professionals. Little is known about whether it helps health care professionals to share, mobilize, and cocreate knowledge or reduce the time between research knowledge being created and used in clinical practice (the evidence-to-practice gap). Musculoskeletal first contact physiotherapists (FCPs) are primary care specialists who diagnose and treat people with musculoskeletal conditions without needing to see their general practitioner (family physician) first. They often work as a sole FCP in practice; hence, they are an ideal health care professional group with whom to explore knowledge mobilization using Twitter. OBJECTIVE We aimed to explore how Twitter is and can be used to mobilize knowledge, including research findings, to inform FCPs' clinical practice. METHODS Semistructured interviews of FCPs with experience of working in English primary care were conducted. FCPs were purposively sampled based on employment arrangements and Twitter use. Recruitment was accomplished via known FCP networks and Twitter, supplemented by snowball sampling. Interviews were conducted digitally and used a topic guide exploring FCP's perceptions and experiences of accessing knowledge, via Twitter, for clinical practice. Data were analyzed thematically and informed by the knowledge mobilization mindlines model. Public contributors were involved throughout. RESULTS In total, 19 FCPs consented to the interview (Twitter users, n=14 and female, n=9). Three themes were identified: (1) How Twitter meets the needs of FCPs, (2) Twitter and a journey of knowledge to support clinical practice, and (3) factors impeding knowledge sharing on Twitter. FCPs described needs relating to isolated working practices, time demands, and role uncertainty. Twitter provided rapid access to succinct knowledge, the opportunity to network, and peer reassurance regarding clinical cases, evidence, and policy. FCPs took a journey of knowledge exchange on Twitter, including scrolling for knowledge, filtering for credibility and adapting knowledge for in-service training and clinical practice. Participants engaged best with images and infographics. FCPs described misinformation, bias, echo chambers, unprofessionalism, hostility, privacy concerns and blurred personal boundaries as factors impeding knowledge sharing on Twitter. Consequently, many did not feel confident enough to actively participate on Twitter. CONCLUSIONS This study explores how Twitter is and can be used to mobilize knowledge to inform FCP clinical practice. Twitter can meet the knowledge needs of FCPs through rapid access to succinct knowledge, networking opportunities, and professional reassurance. The journey of knowledge exchange from Twitter to clinical practice can be explained by considering the mindlines model, which describes how FCPs exchange knowledge in digital and offline contexts. Findings demonstrate that Twitter can be a useful adjunct to FCP practice, although several factors impede knowledge sharing on the platform. We recommend social media training and enhanced governance guidance from professional bodies to support the use of Twitter for knowledge mobilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Campbell
- Impact Accelerator Unit, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan Quicke
- STARS Education and Research Alliance, Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Services (STARS), The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
| | - Kay Stevenson
- Impact Accelerator Unit, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
- Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Stoke on Trent, United Kingdom
| | - Zoe Paskins
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
- Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Stoke on Trent, United Kingdom
| | - Krysia Dziedzic
- Impact Accelerator Unit, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
| | - Laura Swaithes
- Impact Accelerator Unit, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Bhardwaj A, Barry Walsh C, Ezzat A, O'Riordan C, Kennedy N, Toomey CM. Patient and clinician perspectives of online-delivered exercise programmes for chronic musculoskeletal conditions: a mixed-methods systematic review. Disabil Rehabil 2024; 46:2196-2212. [PMID: 37341382 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2224085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To synthesize common or differing perceptions of patients' and clinicians' that influence uptake of online-delivered exercise programmes (ODEPs) for chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions. METHODS Eight databases were searched from inception to April 2023 for studies including (1) patients with and/or clinicians delivering ODEPs for chronic MSK conditions, and (2) synchronous ODEPs, where information is exchanged simultaneously (mode A); asynchronous ODEPs, with at least one synchronous feature (mode B); or no ODEPs, documenting past experiences and/or likelihood of participating in an ODEP (mode C). Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklists were used to assess study quality. Perceptions of patients' and clinicians' influencing uptake of ODEPs were extracted. Quantitative and qualitative data were synthesised and integrated. RESULTS Twenty-one studies were included (twelve quantitative, seven qualitative, and two mixed-methods) investigating the perceptions of 1275 patients and 534 clinicians on ODEP mode A (n = 7), mode B (n = 8), and mode C (n = 6). Sixteen of the 23 identified perceptions related to satisfaction, acceptability, usability, and effectiveness were common, with 70% of perceptions facilitating uptake and 30% hindering uptake. CONCLUSIONS Findings highlight the need to promote targeted education for patients and clinicians addressing interconnected perceptions, and to develop evidence-based perception-centred strategies encouraging integrated care and guideline-based management of chronic MSK conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avantika Bhardwaj
- School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education & Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Caoimhe Barry Walsh
- School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education & Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Allison Ezzat
- La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Canada
| | - Cliona O'Riordan
- School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education & Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Norelee Kennedy
- School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education & Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Clodagh M Toomey
- School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education & Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Di Donato M, Gray S, Sheehan LR, Buchbinder R, Iles R, Collie A. How Much Physiotherapy, Chiropractic, and Osteopathy Care Do Compensated Australian Workers with Low Back Pain Receive? A Retrospective Cohort Study. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION 2024:10.1007/s10926-024-10202-1. [PMID: 38761339 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-024-10202-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/20/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify the prevalence and frequency of physiotherapy, chiropractic, and/or osteopathy care in Australians with workers' compensation claims for low back pain (LBP). METHODS We included workers with accepted workers' compensation claims longer than 2 weeks from the Australian states of Victoria, Queensland, South Australia, and Western Australia. Workers were grouped by whether they attended physiotherapy, chiropractic, and/or osteopathy in the first 2 years of their claim. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to describe differences between groups. Descriptive statistics and negative binomial regression were used to describe differences in the number of attendances in each group. RESULTS Most workers had at least one physical therapy attendance during the period of their claim (n = 23,619, 82.0%). Worker state, socioeconomic status, and remoteness were the largest contributing factors to likelihood of physical therapy attendance. Most workers only attended physiotherapy (n = 21,035, 89.1%, median of 13 times). Far fewer only attended chiropractic (n = 528, 2.2%, median of 8 times) or only osteopathy (n = 296, 1.3%, median of 10 times), while 1,750 (7.5%) attended for care with more than one type of physical therapy (median of 31 times). CONCLUSION Most Australian workers with workers' compensation time loss claims for LBP attend physiotherapy at least once during their claims. State of claim is the strongest predictor of which physical therapy profession they attend, possibly due to regional availability. Workers who see a physiotherapist have significantly more attendances. Future research should explore the relationship between these patterns of care and claimant outcomes, including work disability duration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Di Donato
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne VIC 3000, Australia.
| | - Shannon Gray
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Luke R Sheehan
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Rachelle Buchbinder
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Ross Iles
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Alex Collie
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne VIC 3000, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Granviken F, Vasseljen O, Bach K, Jaiswal A, Meisingset I. Decision Support for Managing Common Musculoskeletal Pain Disorders: Development of a Case-Based Reasoning Application. JMIR Form Res 2024; 8:e44805. [PMID: 38728686 PMCID: PMC11127158 DOI: 10.2196/44805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Common interventions for musculoskeletal pain disorders either lack evidence to support their use or have small to modest or short-term effects. Given the heterogeneity of patients with musculoskeletal pain disorders, treatment guidelines and systematic reviews have limited transferability to clinical practice. A problem-solving method in artificial intelligence, case-based reasoning (CBR), where new problems are solved based on experiences from past similar problems, might offer guidance in such situations. OBJECTIVE This study aims to use CBR to build a decision support system for patients with musculoskeletal pain disorders seeking physiotherapy care. This study describes the development of the CBR system SupportPrim PT and demonstrates its ability to identify similar patients. METHODS Data from physiotherapy patients in primary care in Norway were collected to build a case base for SupportPrim PT. We used the local-global principle in CBR to identify similar patients. The global similarity measures are attributes used to identify similar patients and consisted of prognostic attributes. They were weighted in terms of prognostic importance and choice of treatment, where the weighting represents the relevance of the different attributes. For the local similarity measures, the degree of similarity within each attribute was based on minimal clinically important differences and expert knowledge. The SupportPrim PT's ability to identify similar patients was assessed by comparing the similarity scores of all patients in the case base with the scores on an established screening tool (the short form Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire [ÖMSPQ]) and an outcome measure (the Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire [MSK-HQ]) used in musculoskeletal pain. We also assessed the same in a more extensive case base. RESULTS The original case base contained 105 patients with musculoskeletal pain (mean age 46, SD 15 years; 77/105, 73.3% women). The SupportPrim PT consisted of 29 weighted attributes with local similarities. When comparing the similarity scores for all patients in the case base, one at a time, with the ÖMSPQ and MSK-HQ, the most similar patients had a mean absolute difference from the query patient of 9.3 (95% CI 8.0-10.6) points on the ÖMSPQ and a mean absolute difference of 5.6 (95% CI 4.6-6.6) points on the MSK-HQ. For both ÖMSPQ and MSK-HQ, the absolute score difference increased as the rank of most similar patients decreased. Patients retrieved from a more extensive case base (N=486) had a higher mean similarity score and were slightly more similar to the query patients in ÖMSPQ and MSK-HQ compared with the original smaller case base. CONCLUSIONS This study describes the development of a CBR system, SupportPrim PT, for musculoskeletal pain in primary care. The SupportPrim PT identified similar patients according to an established screening tool and an outcome measure for patients with musculoskeletal pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fredrik Granviken
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Clinic of Rehabilitation, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Ottar Vasseljen
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Kerstin Bach
- Department of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Amar Jaiswal
- Department of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Ingebrigt Meisingset
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Unit for Physiotherapy Services, Trondheim Municipality, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Eek F, Stigmar K. Scientific approach, attitudes, and perspectives on research among Swedish physiotherapy students-a cross-sectional study. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2024; 24:505. [PMID: 38714937 PMCID: PMC11077752 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05477-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Scientific evidence is important to evidence-based practice. Hence, the application of evidence-based practice requires relevant skills and an understanding of science, which therefore need to be learned and trained during the undergraduate program in physiotherapy. The aim of this study was to investigate attitudes, perceived competence, and conditions for a scientific approach among physiotherapy students in Sweden, and to compare attitudes and perceived competence between students in different program years. METHODS Physiotherapy students from six universities (n = 1499) were invited to respond to a digital survey. The survey contained questions regarding attitudes toward science, perceived competence in research interpretations and open comments regarding requirements for a strengthened scientific approach during education. Comparisons between education years were performed with ANOVA/Kruskal‒Wallis test (scale outcomes) and logistic regression (binary outcomes). RESULTS A total of 466 students responded to the survey. In total, 57% (n = 266) of the students had a high interest in science. No significant difference in interest in science was found between students in the three program years, but 75% (n = 347) reported increased interest during the program. A perceived high ability to understand the structure and performance of scientific studies was reported by 31% (n = 144), to evaluate the methodology by 16% (n = 72) and to interpret statistical results from scientific studies by 12% (n = 55). The lowest perceived competence was reported among students in their second year (p < 0.05). A majority of the students (88%; n = 410) reported a perceived personal need for strengthened conditions for a scientific approach, with suggested prerequisites during education via increased theoretical and applied understanding of the research. CONCLUSION Even though this study does not fully cover physiotherapy students at all undergraduate programmes in Sweden, the results support that a scientific approach and training should be strengthened during education to enable physiotherapists to understand and interpret science and to fully apply an evidence-based approach in upcoming clinical practice. Both theoretical and applied knowledge and understanding are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frida Eek
- Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Box 117, Lund, 22100, Sweden.
| | - Kjerstin Stigmar
- Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Box 117, Lund, 22100, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|