Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in HIV-infected pregnant women: protocol of a multicentre, two-arm, randomised, placebo-controlled, superiority clinical trial (MAMAH project)

Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Plus Azithromycin to Prevent Malaria and Sexually Transmitted Infections in Pregnant Women With HIV (PREMISE): A Randomized, Double-Masked, Placebo-Controlled, Phase IIB Clinical Trial

Background

This trial tested the effectiveness of a novel regimen to prevent malaria and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among pregnant women with HIV in Cameroon. Our hypothesis was that the addition of azithromycin (AZ) to standard daily trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) prophylaxis would reduce malaria and STI infection rates at delivery.

Methods

Pregnant women with HIV at gestational age <28 weeks were randomized to adjunctive monthly oral AZ 1 g daily or placebo for 3 days and both groups received daily standard oral TMP-SMX through delivery. Primary outcomes were (1) positive peripheral malaria infection by microscopy or polymerase chain reaction and (2) composite bacterial genital STI (Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, or syphilis) at delivery. Relative risk and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using 2 × 2 tables with significance as P < .05.

Results

Pregnant women with HIV (n = 308) were enrolled between March 2018 and August 2020: 155 women were randomized to TMP-SMX-AZ and 153 women to TMP-SMX-placebo. Groups were similar at baseline and loss to follow up was 3.2%. There was no difference in the proportion with malaria (16.3% in TMP-SMX-AZ vs 13.2% in TMP-SMX; relative risk, 1.24 [95% confidence interval, .71-2.16]) or STI at delivery (4.2% in TMP-SMX-AZ vs 5.8% in TMP-SMX; relative risk, 0.72 [95% confidence interval, .26-2.03]). Adverse birth outcomes were not significantly different, albeit lower in the TMP-SMX-AZ arm (preterm delivery 6.7% vs 10.7% [P = .3]; low birthweight 3.4% vs 5.4% [P = .6]).

Conclusions

The addition of monthly azithromycin to daily TMP-SMX prophylaxis in pregnant women living with HIV in Cameroon did not reduce the risk of malaria or bacterial STI at delivery.

Safety and efficacy of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnant women with HIV from Gabon and Mozambique: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The cornerstone of malaria prevention in pregnancy, intermittent preventive treatment (IPTp) with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, is contraindicated in women with HIV who are receiving co-trimoxazole prophylaxis. We assessed whether IPTp with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine is safe and effective in reducing the risk of malaria infection in women with HIV receiving co-trimoxazole prophylaxis and antiretroviral drugs.

METHODS

For this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, women with HIV attending the first antenatal care clinic visit, resident in the study area, and with a gestational age up to 28 weeks were enrolled at five sites in Gabon and Mozambique. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either IPTp with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine at each scheduled antenatal care visit plus daily co-trimoxazole (intervention group) or placebo at each scheduled antenatal care visit plus daily co-trimoxazole (control group). Randomisation was done centrally via block randomisation (block sizes of eight), stratified by country. IPTp was given over 3 days under direct observation by masked study personnel. The number of daily IPTp tablets was based on bodyweight and according to the treatment guidelines set by WHO (target dose of 4 mg/kg per day [range 2-10 mg/kg per day] of dihydroartemisinin and 18 mg/kg per day [range 16-27 mg/kg per day] of piperaquine given once a day for 3 days). At enrolment, all participants received co-trimoxazole (fixed combination drug containing 800 mg trimethoprim and 160 mg sulfamethoxazole) for daily intake. The primary study outcome was prevalence of peripheral parasitaemia detected by microscopy at delivery. The modified intention-to-treat population included all randomly assigned women who had data for the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included frequency of adverse events, incidence of clinical malaria during pregnancy, and frequency of poor pregnancy outcomes. All study personnel, investigators, outcome assessors, data analysts, and participants were masked to treatment assignment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03671109.

FINDINGS

From Sept 18, 2019, to Nov 26, 2021, 666 women (mean age 28·5 years [SD 6·4]) were enrolled and randomly assigned to the intervention (n=332) and control (n=334) groups. 294 women in the intervention group and 308 women in the control group had peripheral blood samples taken at delivery and were included in the primary analysis. Peripheral parasitaemia at delivery was detected in one (<1%) of 294 women in the intervention group and none of 308 women in the control group. The incidence of clinical malaria during pregnancy was lower in the intervention group than in the control group (one episode in the intervention group vs six in the control group; relative risk [RR] 0·12, 95% CI 0·03-0·52, p=0·045). In a post-hoc analysis, the composite outcome of overall malaria infection (detected by any diagnostic test during pregnancy or delivery) was lower in the intervention group than in the control group (14 [5%] of 311 women vs 31 [10%] of 320 women; RR 0·48, 95% CI 0·27-0·84, p=0·010). The frequency of serious adverse events and poor pregnancy outcomes (such as miscarriages, stillbirths, premature births, and congenital malformations) did not differ between groups. The most frequently reported drug-related adverse events were gastrointestinal disorder (reported in less than 4% of participants) and headache (reported in less than 2% of participants), with no differences between study groups.

INTERPRETATION

In the context of low malaria transmission, the addition of IPTp with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine to co-trimoxazole prophylaxis in pregnant women with HIV did not reduce peripheral parasitaemia at delivery. However, the intervention was safe and associated with a decreased risk of clinical malaria and overall Plasmodium falciparum infection, so it should be considered as a strategy to protect pregnant women with HIV from malaria.

FUNDING

European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership 2 (EDCTP2) and Medicines for Malaria Venture.

TRANSLATIONS

For the Portuguese and French translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Prevalence and impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on maternal and infant health in African populations: protocol of a multicentre prospective cohort study (MA-CoV project)

INTRODUCTION

Pregnant women are currently considered a vulnerable population to SARS-CoV-2 infection, with increased risk of severe COVID-19, preterm birth and maternal mortality. There is, however, a paucity of data on the burden of maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection in sub-Saharan countries. The objective of this study is to determine the prevalence and health effects of maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection in selected sites from Gabon and Mozambique.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

MA-CoV (MAternal CoVid) is an observational, multicentre prospective cohort study where 1000 pregnant women (500 per country) will be enrolled at the antenatal clinic visits. Participants will undergo monthly follow-up at each antenatal care visit, delivery and postpartum visit. The primary study outcome is the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy. The clinical presentation of COVID-19 in pregnancy will also be characterised, and incidence of infection during pregnancy will be evaluated, as well as the risk factors of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection and the risk of mother to child transmission of SARS-CoV-2. SARS-CoV-2 infection screening will be performed through PCR diagnosis.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The protocol was reviewed and approved by the Comité National d'Éthique pour la Recherche au Gabon, Comité Nacional de Bioética para Saúde de Moçambique and the Ethics Committee of the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona (Spain). Project results will be presented to all stakeholders and published in open access journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05303168.

SARS-CoV-2 Seropositivity and HIV Viral Load Among Mozambican Pregnant Women

INTRODUCTION

Prevalence estimates of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Africa are limited, particularly among pregnant women and in those living with HIV. This study assessed the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among Mozambican HIV-infected pregnant women during the first year of the pandemic, before COVID-19 vaccines were deployed in the country.

SETTING

The study was conducted in Manhiça district, a semirural area in southern Mozambique.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study including pregnant women living with HIV was conducted from November 2019 to June 2021. Women were enrolled at the first antenatal care clinic visit and followed until postpartum. HIV viral load and IgM/IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 were determined in blood samples at first antenatal care clinic visit and at delivery. Associations between SARS-CoV-2 serostatus and maternal characteristics at enrolment were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 397 women were enrolled. SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM antibodies were detected in 7.1% of women at enrolment and in 8.5% of women at delivery. Overall, SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were detected in 45 women (11.3%; 95% confidence interval 8.4 to 14.9%) during the study period; the first seropositive sample was identified in September 2020. Having undetectable HIV viral load was associated with seropositivity of SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM [odds ratio 3.35 (1.10 to 11.29); P = 0.039].

CONCLUSION

Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in this cohort of Mozambican unvaccinated pregnant women was similar to reported global estimates of approximately 10% in pregnancy for 2021. The findings also suggest that pregnant women with high HIV viral load may have an impaired immune response against SARS-CoV-2 and might need to be carefully managed in case of COVID-19.

Impact of Dolutegravir-Based Antiretroviral Therapy on Piperaquine Exposure following Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine Intermittent Preventive Treatment of Malaria in Pregnant Women Living with HIV

Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, an artemisinin-based combination therapy, has been identified as a promising agent for intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy. However, in pregnant women living with HIV (PLWH), efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) significantly reduces the plasma exposure of piperaquine. In an open-label, nonrandomized, fixed-sequence, pharmacokinetic study, we compared piperaquine plasma concentrations in 13 pregnant women during a 3-day treatment course of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine when coadministered with efavirenz-based versus dolutegravir-based ART in the second or third trimester of pregnancy. Piperaquine concentrations were measured over a 28-day period, while on efavirenz-based ART and after switching to dolutegravir-based ART. Noncompartmental analysis was performed, and geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were generated to compare piperaquine pharmacokinetic parameters between these two treatment periods. Compared with efavirenz-based ART, coadministration of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine and dolutegravir-based ART resulted in a 57% higher overall piperaquine exposure (area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 672 h [AUC_{0-672 h}]) (GMR, 1.57; 90% CI, 1.28 to 1.93). Piperaquine's day 7 concentrations were also 63% higher (GMR, 1.63; 90% CI, 1.29 to 2.11), while day 28 concentrations were nearly three times higher (GMR, 2.96; 90% CI, 2.25 to 4.07). However, the maximum piperaquine concentration (C_max) remained similar (GMR, 1.09; 90% CI, 0.79 to 1.49). Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine was well tolerated, with no medication-related serious adverse events observed in this small study. Compared with efavirenz-based ART, a known inducer of piperaquine metabolism, dolutegravir-based ART resulted in increased overall piperaquine exposure with pharmacokinetic parameter values that were similar to those published previously for pregnant and nonpregnant women. Our findings suggest that the efficacy of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine will be retained in pregnant women on dolutegravir. (The study was registered on PACTR.samrc.ac.za [PACTR201910580840196].).

Pregnancy and malaria: the perfect storm

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Malaria in pregnancy continues to exert a toll on pregnant women and their offspring.

RECENT FINDINGS

The burden of Plasmodium falciparum infection is especially large in Africa, and new data show lasting effects of maternal infection on the infant's neurocognitive development. Elsewhere, P. vivax infection causes relapsing infections that are challenging to prevent. Infection in first trimester of pregnancy is an area of increasing focus, and its adverse effects on pregnancy outcome are increasingly recognised. First-trimester infection is common and frequently acquired prior to conception. Although newer rapid diagnostic tests still have limited sensitivity, they may be useful in detection of early pregnancy malaria for treatment. Artemisinin-based combination therapies are efficacious in later pregnancy but have yet to be recommended in first trimester because of limited safety data. In Africa, intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp) with monthly sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine improves pregnancy outcomes, but sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance is worsening. The alternative, IPTp with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, has greater antimalarial efficacy, but does not appear to improve pregnancy outcomes, because sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine has poorly understood nonmalarial benefits on birthweight.

SUMMARY

Novel IPTp regimens must be combined with interventions to strengthen protection from malaria infection acquired before and in early pregnancy.

Drugs for Intermittent Preventive Treatment of Malaria in Pregnancy: Current Knowledge and Way Forward

Malaria infection during pregnancy is an important driver of maternal and neonatal health in endemic countries. Intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp) with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) is recommended for malaria prevention at each scheduled antenatal care visit, starting at the second trimester, in areas of high and moderate transmission. However, the increased resistance to SP in some endemic areas challenges its effectiveness. Furthermore, SP is contraindicated in the first trimester of pregnancy and in HIV-infected women on co-trimoxazole prophylaxis due to potential drug–drug interactions. Thus, in recent last decades, several studies evaluated alternative drugs that could be used for IPTp. A comprehensive literature review was conducted to summarize the evidence on the efficacy and safety of antimalarial drugs being evaluated for IPTp. Chloroquine, amodiaquine, mefloquine and azithromycin as IPTp have proven to be worse tolerated than SP. Mefloquine was found to increase the risk of mother-to-child transmission of HIV. Dihydroartemisin-piperaquine currently constitutes the most promising IPTp drug alternative; it reduced the prevalence of malaria infection, and placental and clinical malaria in studies among HIV-uninfected women, and it is currently being tested in HIV-infected women. Research on effective antimalarial drugs that can be safely administered for prevention to pregnant women should be prioritized. Malaria prevention in the first trimester of gestation and tailored interventions for HIV-infected women remain key research gaps to be addressed.

Effect of dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine for malaria intermittent preventive treatment on dolutegravir exposure in pregnant women living with HIV

BACKGROUND

In sub-Saharan Africa, the burdens of malaria and HIV infections overlap. In settings with moderate-to-high malaria transmission intensity, pregnant women living with HIV (PLWH) require both ART and malaria intermittent preventive treatment (IPTp). Dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine has been identified as a promising alternative to sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine for IPTp. However, another antimalarial drug, artesunate/amodiaquine, similar to dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine, was previously shown to reduce dolutegravir exposure in non-pregnant adults.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effect of dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine on dolutegravir plasma exposure in pregnant women on dolutegravir-based ART.

METHODS

We conducted an open-label, non-randomized, fixed-sequence, pharmacokinetic study in PLWH in Malawi. Dolutegravir concentrations were measured over a 24 h period, before and after the recommended 3 day treatment dose of dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine in 12 pregnant women in their second or third trimester. Non-compartmental analysis was performed, and geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and 90% CIs were generated to compare dolutegravir pharmacokinetic parameters between the two treatment periods.

RESULTS

Co-administration of dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine and dolutegravir increased dolutegravir's overall exposure (AUC0-24) and Cmax by 30% (GMR 1.30; 90% CI 1.11-1.52) and 31% (GMR 1.31; 90% CI 1.13-1.51), respectively. The dolutegravir trough (C24) concentration increased by 42% (GMR 1.42; 90% CI 1.09-1.85). The combined treatments were well tolerated with no serious adverse events observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine may be administered with dolutegravir-based ART in pregnant women as the modest increase in dolutegravir exposure, similar to pharmacokinetic parameter values published previously, ensures its efficacy without any clinically significant adverse events observed in this small study.