Gastric cancer completeness in Finnish Cancer Registry and Finnish Patient Registry: a population-based nationwide retrospective cohort study

Completeness Evaluation of Adult-Population-Based Cancer Registries: A Systematic Review

Population-based cancer registries are crucial for tracking cancer trends, supporting research, guiding policy decisions, and ensuring efficient healthcare resource allocation. However, their effectiveness relies heavily on data quality, specifically the completeness of the cancer registration process.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

This systematic review aims to identify the methods used by adult population-based cancer registries worldwide to assess the completeness of their data. It also considered the significant role of high-quality data in method selection and the significant challenges of data handling.

METHODS

A comprehensive electronic literature search was conducted across the Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed for studies published from January 2004 to December 2024. The review was written according to PRISMA guidelines, and the risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute tool.

RESULTS

The review identified 83 studies from 31 countries, the majority from Europe, especially Nordic and Central European countries. Most studies met high-quality standards, with only one study scoring below 75%. Common approaches include independent case ascertainment (the most used), a capture-recapture analysis, a death-certificate-only analysis, and comparisons with historical rates. While independent case ascertainment is valuable when high-quality auxiliary sources are available, its accuracy varies. Other methods, like capture-recapture or Mortality-to-Incidence ratios, may be more accurate or feasible in some cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that methods for completeness evaluations vary widely across registries, influenced by data quality and regional practices. The results emphasize the importance of the continuous refinement of these assessment methods to improve the reliability and global comparability of cancer registry data.

University hospital status and gastric cancer mortality: A population-based nationwide study in Finland

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer remains a significant global health issue with increasing mortality, despite advancements in treatment. Previous studies have suggested that surgery performed at university hospitals may influence surgical outcomes and mortality rates, but evidence of its effect on gastric cancer remains limited. This study aimed to investigate whether gastrectomy performed at university hospitals reduces short-term and long-term mortality rates in Finland.

METHODS

This nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study analyzed patients with gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy in Finland from 1987 to 2016, using data from the Finnish Cancer Registry, Finnish Patient Registry, and Finnish Death Registry. The study compared 5-year, 30-day, and 90-day all-cause mortality rates between patients treated at university hospitals and those treated at nonuniversity hospitals, with adjustments for confounders using multivariate Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Of 10,455 patients who underwent gastrectomy in Finland between 1987 and 2016, most were treated in nonuniversity hospitals. Patients who underwent gastrectomy at university hospitals were generally younger and had more comorbidities and more advanced cancer stages. Of note, 30-day, 90-day, and 5-year survival rates were higher in university hospitals than in nonuniversity hospitals, although the differences in 90-day and 5-year survival rates were not statistically significant in more recent years.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that gastrectomy performed at university hospitals in Finland is associated with lower short-term and long-term mortality rates than gastrectomy performed at nonuniversity hospitals. In addition, our findings support the potential benefits of centralizing gastric cancer surgical procedures at university hospitals. However, further research is needed to explore the underlying reasons.

Clinical presentation and treatment outcomes of gastric adenocarcinoma patients: a retrospective study from Ain Shams Clinical Oncology Department

Background

Gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) has a different epidemiological profile in Egypt than in other countries. It ranks 11th in incidence, with 3,285 new cases and 10th in mortality, with 2,469 cases. This retrospective study aims to analyze gastric cancer epidemiology and clinical outcomes in Egyptian patients at Ain Shams University Clinical Oncology Department.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the complete medical records of patients with confirmed GAC at the Ain Shams University Clinical Oncology Department from January 2017 to December 2020.

Results

This study included 70 patients with GAC. The median age was 52.5 years, with nearly half of cases under 50 years and males representing 53% of the cohort. 70% of patients were from urban areas. Nearly one-third were smokers, with 57.1% having medical comorbidities, mainly diabetes mellitus, hypertension and viral hepatitis. Additionally, 25.7% had a positive family history of GAC. Most Common presenting symptoms were vomiting (42.9%) and abdominal pain (57.1%). 40% of tumours were in the gastric body, and 64.3% were diffuse-type GAC, with 64.3% classified as high grade (III). At presentation, the majority of cases were metastatic (55.7%), with 15.7% presenting with stage II disease and 28.6% with stage III. Most patients (72.8%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ≤2. Only 18.6% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, while 48.6% underwent surgical resection with adequate lymph node dissection in 55.9% of cases. Adjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation was administered to 19 patients. The median overall survival (OS) was 11 months, 36 months for stage II, 17 months for stage III and 7 months for stage IV. Univariate analysis indicated that female gender, higher stage (Stage III-IV), higher grade (G IV), absence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and intestinal type were significantly associated with increased mortality. However, multivariate analysis adjusting for these factors identified the advanced stage as a significant independent predictor of mortality.

Conclusion

This study identified the distinct GAC profile of Egyptian patients, younger age, aggressive tumours and frequent metastases. These factors contributed to lower OS. Further research and targeted interventions are needed to improve outcomes.

Impact of splenectomy on long-term outcomes after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

No national studies comparing long-term survival after total or partial gastrectomy with splenectomy due to injury or oncologic reasons or spleen preservation exist. This study aimed to examine the 5-year overall survival (OS) of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent total or partial gastrectomy with splenectomy due to injury or oncologic reasons or spleen preservation in a population-based nationwide setting.

METHODS

This study included all patients undergoing total or partial gastrectomy with splenectomy or spleen preservation for gastric adenocarcinoma in Finland from 2005 to 2016, with follow-up until December 31, 2019. A total of 2196 patients with gastric cancer diagnosis and total or partial gastrectomy were identified in the registries. Of these patients, 2118 were applicable for this study. Cox proportional hazard models provided hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs of 5-year OS. The results were adjusted for age, sex, year of operation, comorbidities, tumor location, pathologic stage, and neoadjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

The observed 5-year OS rates were 38.7% in patients with no or minor spleen injury, 39.7% in patients with splenectomy due to injury, and 30.8% in patients with splenectomy due to oncologic reasons (P = .032). Patients who underwent R0 gastrectomy with splenectomy due to oncologic reasons had higher 5-year mortality (the adjusted model HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.01-1.56) than patients who underwent spleen preservation.

CONCLUSION

The OS was worst in patients who underwent gastrectomy with splenectomy due to oncologic reasons, highlighting the poor prognosis in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Splenectomy due to injury does not compromise the prognosis.

Comparison of Postoperative Complications After Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer with Antecolic Versus Retrocolic Reconstruction: A Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to examine the rates of 90-day anastomotic complications and other postoperative complications after total or partial gastrectomy with antecolic versus retrocolic reconstruction in a population-based setting.

METHODS

This population-based nationwide retrospective cohort study included all patients undergoing total or partial gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in Finland in 2005-2016, with follow-up until 31 December 2019. Logistic regression provided odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of 90-day mortality. Results were adjusted for age, sex, year of the surgery, comorbidities, tumor locations, pathological stage, and neoadjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 2063 patients having gastrectomy with antecolic (n = 814) or retrocolic (n = 1249) reconstruction were identified from the registries. The anastomotic complication rate was 3.8% with antecolic reconstruction and 5.0% with retrocolic reconstruction. Antecolic reconstruction was not associated with a higher risk of anastomotic complications compared with retrocolic reconstruction in the adjusted analysis (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.44-1.09) of the whole cohort or in the predefined subgroups. The reoperation rate was 8.2% with antecolic reconstruction and 7.7% with retrocolic reconstruction, without statistical significance. In subgroup analysis of total gastrectomy patients, the risk of major complications was lower with antecolic reconstruction compared with retrocolic reconstruction (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.45-0.86).

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of anastomotic complications did not differ after antecolic versus retrocolic reconstruction after total or partial gastrectomy. In total gastrectomies, the risk of major complications was lower after antecolic compared with retrocolic reconstruction.

Postoperative delayed emptying after total, subtotal, or distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to examine the rate of delayed emptying and other 90-day postoperative complications after total, subtotal, and distal gastrectomies for gastric adenocarcinoma in a population-based setting.

METHODS

This study included all patients who underwent total, subtotal, or distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer in Finland in 2005-2016, with follow-up until December 31, 2019. Logistic regression provided the odds ratios with 95% CIs of 90-day mortality. The results were adjusted for age, sex, year of surgery, comorbidities, pathologic stage, and neoadjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 2058 patients underwent total (n = 1227), subtotal (n = 450), or distal (n = 381) gastrectomy. In the total, subtotal, and distal gastrectomy groups, the rates of 90-day delayed emptying were 1.7%, 1.3%, and 2.1% in the whole cohort and 1.6%, 1.8%, and 3.5% in the subgroup analysis of R0 resections, respectively. The resection type was not associated with the risk of delayed emptying. Subtotal gastrectomy was associated with a lower risk of major complications and reoperations, whereas distal gastrectomy was associated with a lower risk of anastomotic complications.

CONCLUSION

The extent of resection did not affect delayed emptying, whereas fewer postoperative complications were observed after subtotal or distal gastrectomy than after total gastrectomy.

The impact of implementing current treatment modalities and female sex on gastric cancer outcomes, 2000-2016: a longitudinal nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND

The implementation of current treatment modalities and their impact on nationwide gastric cancer outcomes remain poorly understood. Biological differences between females and males could impact survival. We aimed to analyze rates of gastric surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy as well as changes in overall survival among gastric cancer patients diagnosed between 2000-2008 and 2009-2016, respectively, in Finland.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data on gastric cancer patients were collected from national registries. Cox regression analysis and the Kaplan-Meier method were used to analyze differences in survival.

RESULTS

We identified 9223 histologically confirmed gastric cancer patients. The rate of gastric surgery decreased from 44% (n = 2282) to 34% (n = 1368; p < 0.001). The proportion of gastric surgery patients who underwent preoperative oncological treatment increased from 0.5% (n = 12) to 16.2% (n = 222) between the calendar periods (p < 0.001) and stood at 30% in 2016. The median overall survival (OS) improved from 30 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 28-33] to 38 months (95%CI 33-42; p = 0.006) and the period 2009-2016 independently associated with a lower risk of death [hazard ratio (HR) 0.78, 95%CI 0.70-0.87] among patients who underwent gastric surgery. Females exhibited a lower risk of death (HR 0.88, 95%CI 0.81-0.97) among patients who underwent gastric surgery.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative oncological treatment was gradually introduced into clinical practice and OS among gastric surgery patients improved. Moreover, female surgical patients exhibited a better survival than male patients.

Survival trends in gastric cancer patients between 1987 and 2016: a population-based cohort study in Finland

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. There is a paucity of national studies examining gastric cancer mortality in relation to treatment status. This study evaluated the survival trends in gastric adenocarcinoma and all gastric cancers stratified by treatment in Finland during 1987-2016.

METHODS

This population-based, nationwide, retrospective cohort study included all gastric cancer patients registered in the Finnish Cancer Registry and Patient Registry. The survival rates were calculated for 1, 3, and 5 years, stratified by treatment. Prognostic factors were determined using Cox regression.

RESULTS

A total of 18,713 non-cardia gastric adenocarcinoma, and 3617 cardia adenocarcinoma patients were included. Surgical treatment decreased for non-cardia adenocarcinoma and remained constant for cardia adenocarcinoma. In non-cardia adenocarcinoma, the 5-year survival declined from 17% to 16% from 1987-1991 to 2012-2016. In surgically treated patients, survival increased from 29% to 38%, while an increase from 4% to 7% in those undergoing chemotherapy and decrease from 6% to 3% in those not receiving any treatment were observed. In cardia adenocarcinoma, the 5-year survival increased from 10% to 18% in all patients, 16% to 40% in surgical patients, 0% to 5% in patients receiving chemotherapy, and from 5% to 9% in patients receiving no treatment. Earlier calendar periods, older age, male sex, and higher comorbidity were risk factors for poor prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric non-cardia adenocarcinoma survival declined, limited to advanced stage patients not receiving any treatment. Gastric cardia cancer survival seems to have improved over time in Finland. This study evaluated survival trends of gastric cancer in Finland during 1987-2016 and established that the 5-year survival is declining in non-cardia adenocarcinoma but improving in all gastric cancers.