Creating a culture of quality: our experience with providing feedback to frontline hospitalists

Improving promptness and quality of hospitalist-consultant interactions at an academic teaching hospital

Communication between consulting and consultant services is essential to provide high-value care. We implemented a collaborative project between hospital medicine (HM), emergency medicine (EM), and departmental leadership of the major consulting services to provide feedback regarding consultant communication, promptness, and follow-up planning. We conducted pre- and postintervention surveys of HM and EM clinicians and measured the mean turnaround time (TAT) from consult order to consultant note completion. Perceptions of consultant promptness and follow-up communication improved postintervention. Mean TAT was significantly reduced postintervention (1098 vs. 1011 min, p = .002, confidence interval [CI]: 30.7-143.3). A collaborative approach using interdepartmental feedback improved perceptions of the quality of interactions with consulting services.

Features and effectiveness of electronic audit and feedback for patient safety and quality of care in hospitals: A systematic review

Background: Increasing digitisation in healthcare is flowing through to quality improvement strategies, like audit and feedback. Objectives: To systematically review electronic audit and feedback (e-A&F) interventions in hospital settings, examining contemporary practices and quantitatively assessing the relationship between features and effectiveness. Methods: We performed a systematic review using a structured search strategy from 2011 to July 2022. Searches yielded a total of 5095 unique publications, with 152 included in a descriptive synthesis, reporting publication characteristics and practices, and 63 in the quantitative synthesis, to evaluate the effect size of intervention features. Results: The search returned publications across characteristics, including countries of origin, feedback topics, target health professionals, and study design types. We also identified an association with effectiveness for all but one of the features examined, with a Cohen's d ranging from above +0.8 (a large positive effect), to -0.67 (a medium negative effect). Socio-technical features related to supportive organisations and the involvement of engaged health professionals were most associated with effective interventions. Conclusion: Key findings have confirmed that a common set of features of e-A&F systems can influence effectiveness. Results provide practitioners with insight into where resources should be focused during the implementation of e-A&F.

Near real-time patient experience feedback with data relay to providers: a systematic review of its effectiveness

Near Real-Time Feedback (NRTF) on the patient's experience with care, coupled with data relay to providers, can inform quality-of-care improvements, including at the point of care. The objective is to systematically review contemporary literature on the impact of the use of NRTF and data relay to providers on standardized patient experience measures. Six scientific databases and five specialty journals were searched supplemented by snowballing search strategies, according to the registered study protocol. Eligibility included studies in English (2015-2023) assessing the impact of NRTF and data relay on standardized patient-reported experience measures as a primary outcome. Eligibility and quality appraisals were performed by two independent reviewers. An expert former patient (Patient and Family Advisory Council and communication sciences background) helped interpret the results. Eight papers met review eligibility criteria, including three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one non-randomized study. Three of these studies involved in-person NRTF prior to data relay (patient-level data for immediate corrective action or aggregated and peer-compared) and led to significantly better results in all or some of the experience measures. In turn, a kiosk-based NRTF achieved no better experience results. The remaining studies were pre-post designs with mixed or neutral results and greater risks of bias. In-person NRTF on the patient experience followed by rapid data relay to their providers, either patient-level or provider-level as peer-compared, can improve the patient experience of care. Reviewed kiosk-based or self-reported approaches combined with data relay were not effective. Further research should determine which approach (e.g. who conducts the in-person NRTF) will provide better, more efficient improvements and under which circumstances.

Increasing and sustaining discharges by noon - a multi-year process improvement project

High hospital occupancy degrades emergency department performance by increasing wait times, decreasing patient satisfaction, and increasing patient morbidity and mortality. Late discharges contribute to high hospital occupancy by increasing emergency department (ED) patient length of stay (LOS). We share our experience with increasing and sustaining early discharges at a 650-bed academic medical center in the United States. Our process improvement project followed the Institute of Medicine Model for Improvement of successive Plan‒Do‒Study‒Act cycles. We implemented multiple iterative interventions over 41 months. As a result, the proportion of discharge orders before 10 am increased from 8.7% at baseline to 22.2% (p < 0.001), and the proportion of discharges by noon (DBN) increased from 9.5% to 26.8% (p < 0.001). There was no increase in balancing metrics because of our interventions. RA-LOS (Risk Adjusted Length Of Stay) decreased from 1.16 to 1.09 (p = 0.01), RA-Mortality decreased from 0.65 to 0.61 (p = 0.62) and RA-Readmissions decreased from 0.92 to 0.74 (p < 0.001). Our study provides a roadmap to large academic facilities to increase and sustain the proportion of patients discharged by noon without negatively impacting LOS, 30-day readmissions, and mortality. Continuous performance evaluation, adaptability to changing resources, multidisciplinary engagement, and institutional buy-in were crucial drivers of our success.

Longitudinal evaluation of an electronic audit and feedback system for patient safety in a large tertiary hospital setting

Objective: This study sought to assess the impact of a novel electronic audit and feedback (e-A&F) system on patient outcomes. Methods: The e-A&F intervention was implemented in a tertiary hospital and involved near real-time feedback via web-based dashboards. We used a segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series. We modelled the pre-post change in outcomes for the (1) announcement of this priority list, and (2) implementation of the e-A&F intervention to have affected patient outcomes. Results: Across the study period there were 222,792 episodes of inpatient care, of which 13,904 episodes were found to contain one or more HACs, a risk of 6.24%. From the point of the first intervention until the end of the study the overall risk of a HAC reduced from 8.57% to 4.12% - a 51.93% reduction. Of this reduction the proportion attributed to each of these interventions was found to be 29.99% for the announcement of the priority list and 21.93% for the implementation of the e-A&F intervention. Discussion: Our findings lend evidence to a mechanism that the announcement of a measurement framework, at a national level, can lead to local strategies, such as e-A&F, that lead to significant continued improvements over time.

Nutrition and Food Literacy: Framing the Challenges to Health Communication

Nutrition and food literacy are two important concepts that are often used interchangeably, but they are not synonymous. Nutrition refers to the study of how food affects the body, while food literacy refers to the knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary to make informed decisions about food and its impact on health. Despite the growing awareness of the importance of food literacy, food illiteracy remains a global issue, affecting people of all ages, backgrounds, and socioeconomic status. Food illiteracy has serious health implications as it contributes to health inequities, particularly among vulnerable populations. In addition, food literacy is a complex and multidisciplinary field, and there are numerous challenges to health communication that must be addressed to effectively promote food literacy and improve health outcomes. Addressing food illiteracy and the challenges to health communication is essential to promote health equity and improve health outcomes for all populations.

Effect of a Performance Feedback Dashboard on Hospitalist Laboratory Test Utilization

BACKGROUND

Healthcare spending continues to be an area of improvement across all forms of medicine. Overtreatment or low-value care, including overutilization of laboratory testing, has an estimated annual cost of waste of $75.7-$101.2 billion annually. Providing performance feedback to hospitalists has been shown to be an effective way to encourage the practice of quality-improvement-focused medicine. There remains limited data regarding the implementation of performance feedback and direct results on hospital laboratory testing spending in the short term.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this project was to identify whether performance-based feedback on laboratory utilization between both hospitalists and resident teams results in more conservative utilization of laboratory testing.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS

This quality improvement project was conducted at a tertiary academic medical center, including both direct-care and house-staff teams.

INTERVENTION OR EXPOSURE

A weekly performance feedback report was generated and distributed to providers detailing laboratory test utilization by all hospitalists in a ranked system, normalized by the census of patients, for 3 months.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The outcome measure was cumulative laboratory utilization during the intervention period compared to baseline utilization during the corresponding 3 months in the year prior and the weekly trend in laboratory utilization over 52 weeks. The aggregate laboratory utilization rate during intervention and control time periods was defined as the total number of laboratory tests ordered divided by the total number of patient encounters. Additionally, the cost difference was averaged per quarter and reported. The week-by-week trend in laboratory utilization was evaluated using a statistical process control (SPC) chart.

RESULTS

We found that following intervention during January-March 2020, the cumulative complete blood count utilization rate decreased from 5.54 to 4.83 per patient encounter and the basic metabolic panels/CMP utilization rate decreased from 6.65 to 6.11 per patient encounter compared with January-March 2019. This equated to cost savings of ~$42,700 in total for the quarter. Nonrandom variation was seen on SPC charts in weekly laboratory utilization rates for common laboratory tests during the intervention period.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that our intervention did result in a decrease in laboratory test utilization rates across direct-care and house-staff teams. This study lays promising groundwork for one tool that can be used to eliminate a source of hospital waste and improve the quality and efficiency of patient care.

Qualitative study of international key informants' perspectives on the current and future state of healthcare quality measurement and feedback

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to explore the current and future state of quality measurement and feedback and identify factors influencing measurement feedback systems, including the barriers and enablers to their effective design, implementation, use and translation into quality improvement.

DESIGN

This qualitative study used semistructured interviews with key informants. A deductive framework analysis was conducted to code transcripts to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). An inductive analysis was used to produce subthemes and belief statements within each TDF domain.

SETTING

All interviews were conducted by videoconference and audio-recorded.

PARTICIPANTS

Key informants were purposively sampled experts in quality measurement and feedback, including clinical (n=5), government (n=5), research (n=4) and health service leaders (n=3) from Australia (n=7), the USA (n=4), the UK (n=2), Canada (n=2) and Sweden (n=2).

RESULTS

A total of 17 key informants participated in the study. The interview length ranged from 48 to 66 min. 12 theoretical domains populated by 38 subthemes were identified as relevant to measurement feedback systems. The most populous domains included environmental context and resources, memory, attention and decision-making, and social influences. The most populous subthemes included 'quality improvement culture', 'financial and human resource support' and 'patient-centred measurement'. There were minimal conflicting beliefs outside of 'data quality and completeness'. Conflicting beliefs in these subthemes were predominantly between government and clinical leaders.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple factors were found to influence measurement feedback systems and future considerations are presented within this manuscript. The barriers and enablers that impact these systems are complex. While there are some clear modifiable factors in the design of measurement and feedback processes, influential factors described by key informants were largely socioenvironmental. Evidence-based design and implementation, coupled with a deeper understanding of the implementation context, may lead to enhanced quality measurement feedback systems and ultimately improved care delivery and patient outcomes.

The Impact of Dynamic Real-Time Feedback on Patient Satisfaction Scores

INTRODUCTION

Providers' communication skills have a significant impact on patients' satisfaction. Improved patients' satisfaction has been positively correlated with various healthcare and financial outcomes. Patients' satisfaction in the inpatient setting is measured using the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey. In this study, we evaluated the impact of dynamic real-time feedback to the providers on the HCAHPS scores.

METHODS

This was a randomized study conducted at our 550-bed level-1 tertiary care center. Twenty-six out of 27 hospitalists staffing our 12 medicine teams (including teams containing advanced practice providers (APPs) and house-staff teams) were randomized into intervention and control groups. Our research assistant interviewed 1110 patients over a period of 7 months and asked them the three provider communication-specific questions from the HCAHPS survey. Our intervention was a daily computer-generated email which alerted providers to their performance on HCAHPS questions (proportions of "always" responses) along with the performance of their peers and Medicare benchmarks.

RESULTS

The intervention and control groups were similar with regard to baseline HCAHPS scores and clinical experience. The proportion of "always" responses to the three questions related to provider communication was statistically significantly higher in the intervention group compared to the control group (86% vs 80.5%, p-value 0.00001). It was also noted that the HCAHPS scores were overall lower on the house-staff teams and higher on the teams with APPs.

CONCLUSION

Real-time patients' feedback to inpatient providers with peer comparison via email has a positive impact on the provider-specific HCAHPS scores.