Implementation of a palliative care consultation trigger tool for hospitalised patients with acute decompensated heart failure

Identifying Palliative Care Needs in Heart Failure Patients With Nurse-Led Screening

Patients with heart failure benefit from specialty palliative care but are often not evaluated for these services. The lack of standardized screening tools and limited nurse training for assessing palliative care needs are contributing factors. This quality improvement project aimed to improve the identification of unmet palliative care needs in patients with heart failure admitted to a progressive care unit by implementing a standardized nurse-administered palliative care screening tool. The nursing staff administered the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS) tool. The number of palliative consultations before project implementation was compared with those during the project. Spearman ρ was assessed for correlation between screening tool score and New York Heart Association (NYHA) heart failure class. Thirty-eight patients completed the screening tool. NYHA class was documented in 29% of patients. Among all patients, those categorized as NYHA III with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction demonstrated the highest need scores. Spearman ρ indicated a nonsignificant ( P > .05), very weak negative correlation between the IPOS scores and NYHA class ( rs = -0.18, P = .60). Implementing a nurse-administered screening tool effectively identified unmet palliative care needs among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and NYHA III. Despite low rates of palliative consults, standardization using IPOS could increase screening, contribute to institutional triggering palliative consultations, and improve awareness of unmet needs.

Charting New Paths: The Nurse Practitioner's Role in Leading Specialty-Aligned Palliative Care Consult Teams

Palliative care has expanded beyond its traditional focus on the oncology population to meet the growing needs of patients with diverse diagnoses. A model of specialty-aligned palliative care has emerged as a means of integrating palliative care into various clinical specialties. Equipped with expert clinical skills, a holistic approach to patient care, and an emphasis on interprofessional collaboration, nurse practitioners are uniquely positioned to lead these teams. This article examines the role nurse practitioners play as leaders of 4 specialty-aligned palliative care teams at a major metropolitan academic medical center. It highlights key contributions to the successful integration of palliative care into oncology, cardiac, renal, and medical-surgical specialties. Although there are clear benefits of nurse practitioner-led specialty-aligned teams, further research and advocacy is needed to strengthen this model and increase access to quality palliative care.

Integration of Palliative Care into Heart Failure Care: Consensus-Based Recommendations from the Heart Failure Society of America

Heart failure (HF) is characterized by significant symptoms, compromised quality of life, frequent hospital admissions, and high mortality rates; palliative care (PC) is, therefore, highly relevant for patients with HF and their clinicians. Multiple guidelines and consensus statements recommend the provision of PC alongside HF management. However, few resources exist to guide the integration of PC into HF care, for both primary PC (provided by HF clinicians in the course of HF care) and specialty PC (provided by PC specialists). Through this consensus statement, the Heart Failure Society of America aims to provide a contemporary, practical guide for clinicians and institutions about how PC should be operationalized in the context of comprehensive HF care. Key components of high-quality, integrated HF-PC are described, with a focus on clinical and operational considerations for providing primary and specialty PC, quality measurement and value demonstration, reimbursement and incentive concerns, and the provision of hospice care.

Factors Associated With Early Palliative Care Among Patients With Heart Failure

Background: Heart failure (HF) is a progressive, life-limiting illness for which palliative care (PC) is considered standard of care. Among patients that do receive PC, consultation tends to occur late in the illness course. Objective: Our primary aim was to examine patient factors associated with receiving PC in HF. Secondarily, we sought to determine factors associated with early PC encounters. Design: This was a retrospective cohort study of U.S. Veterans with prior hospitalization who died between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2020. Setting/Subjects: Subjects were Veterans with HF who died with a prior admission to a Veterans Affairs hospital in the United States. Measurements: We calculated the time from PC encounter to death. We characterized HF patients who died without PC, with late PC (≤90 days before death), and with early PC (>90 days before death). Results: We identified 232,079 Veterans with a mean age of (76.5 ± 10.7) years. Within the cohort, 56.5% (n = 131,122) of Veterans died with no PC, 22.5% (n = 52,114) had PC <90 days before death, and 21.0% (n = 48,843) had PC >90 days before death. Veterans who died without PC tended to be younger with fewer comorbidities. Conclusions: While more than 20% of HF patients in our cohort had PC well in advance of death, more than half died without PC. PC involvement seemed to be driven by comorbidities rather than HF. Effective collaboration with Cardiology is needed to identify patients who would benefit from earlier PC involvement.

Best Practices in Caring for Seriously Ill Patients

Palliative care (PC) is the art and science of providing goal-concordant care, skillfully managing complex and refractory pain and nonpain symptoms, mitigating suffering, and augmenting quality of life for seriously ill patients throughout the course of the illness trajectory. The primary team should provide generalist PC for all seriously ill patients and know when to refer patients to specialist PC. Specialty-level PC services should be reserved for complex problems beyond the scope of primary PC. This article reviews principles and best practices to support patient-centered PC.