Intensive insulin therapy in hospitalised patients increases the risk of hypoglycaemia and has no effect on mortality, infection risk or length of stay

Efficacy and tolerability of sitagliptin and metformin compared with insulin as an initial therapy for newly diagnosed diabetic patients with severe hyperglycaemia

The safety and efficacy of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in patients newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with severe hyperglycaemia have remained to be sufficiently demonstrated. The aim of the present study was to determine whether sitagliptin combined with metformin as an initial treatment had non-inferior outcomes with regards to glycaemic remission and β-cell function recovery to those of standard insulin therapy in this patient group. A prospective observational study was performed comparing the effects of sitagliptin combined with metformin and insulin therapy in a real-world clinical setting. A total of 168 participants were enrolled and received sitagliptin combined with metformin (Sig) or insulin (Ins) for almost 4 weeks. In addition, each group was further stratified into three subgroups, according to glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels (<10, 10-12 and >12%). The primary outcomes were β-cell function and changes in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and HbA1c at the 3-month follow-up. Both insulin and sitagliptin combined with metformin reduced hyperglycaemia and achieved similar glycaemic outcomes, and no significant differences in FPG and HbA1c levels were obtained. No significant changes were observed in β-cell function concomitant with the glucose-lowering effects of the treatments. Of note, participants in the Ins group exhibited weight gain, whereas those in the Sig group had weight loss, with significant differences becoming evident after 1 month, particularly in the HbA1c <10% subgroup. As compared with insulin injection, early treatment with sitagliptin combined with metformin in newly diagnosed patients with T2DM and severe hyperglycaemia produced non-inferior outcomes with regards to glycaemic remission. Therefore, combination of sitagliptin and metformin may be a viable initial treatment option for patients who prefer an alternative to insulin injection. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov under no. NCT03180281.

Efficacy of Vildagliptin Added to Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion (CSII) in Hospitalized Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of vildagliptin as add-on therapy to short-term continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) with CSII monotherapy in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS

A total of 200 hospitalized patients with inadequately controlled T2DM were randomized into groups, with one group receiving CSII monotherapy (CSII group, n =100) and the other group receiving CSII plus vildagliptin as add-on (CSII + Vig group, n = 100). Of these, 191 completed the 7-day trial (CSII group, n = 99; CSII + Vig group, n = 92) and included in the analysis. The glycemic control and variability of the patients were measured using all-day capillary blood glucose (BG) monitoring. Weight and fasting C-peptide levels were evaluated before and after the interventions.

RESULTS

Mean BG concentrations during the whole treatment period were lower and the time to reach target BG was reduced in the CSII + Vig group compared with the CSII group (9.89 ± 3.37 vs. 9.46 ± 3.23 mmol/L, P < 0.01; 129 ± 4 vs. 94 ± 5 h, P < 0.01, respectively). Similarly, the indicators of glycemic variability, namely the standard deviation of BG and the largest amplitude of glycemic excursion, were significantly decreased in the CSII + Vig group compared with the CSII group (2.68 ± 1.05 vs. 2.39 ± 1.00 mmol/L, P < 0.01; 7.19 ± 2.86 vs. 6.23 ± 2.73 mmol/L, P < 0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term CSII with vildagliptin as add-on therapy may be an optimized treatment for hospitalized patients with T2DM compared with short-term CSII monotherapy.

Comparison of the Effects of Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion and Add-On Therapy with Sitagliptin in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

To identify a new regimen to optimize treatment for patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (T2DM) by short-term continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) alone. Methods. 60 patients with newly diagnosed T2DM were randomized into two groups (n = 30 each) and treated for 2 weeks with CSII alone (CSII group) or with CSII plus sitagliptin (CSII + Sig group). The glycemic variability of the patients was measured using a continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) for the last 72 hours. A standard meal test was performed before and after the interventions, and the levels of glycated albumin, fasting glucose, fasting C-peptide, postprandial 2 h blood glucose, and postprandial 2 h C-peptide were examined. Results. Compared with the CSII group, the indicators of glycemic variability, such as the mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (MAGE) and the standard deviation of blood glucose (SDBG), were decreased significantly in the CSII + Sig group. The changes before and after treatment in the C-peptide reactivity index (ΔCPI) and the secretory unit of islet in transplantation index (ΔSUIT) indicated a significant improvement in the CSII + Sig group. Conclusions. Add-on therapy with sitagliptin may be an optimized treatment for patients with newly diagnosed T2DM compared with short-term CSII alone.