Pharmacist prescribing in critical care: an evaluation of the introduction of pharmacist prescribing in a single large UK teaching hospital

A qualitative, theory-based exploration of facilitators and barriers for implementation of pharmacist prescribing in chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

While there is an accumulation of evidence that pharmacist prescribing is safe and effective, there is a lack of research on processes of implementation into practice, particularly for patients with complex clinical conditions such as chronic kidney disease (CKD).

AIM

The aim was to explore the facilitators and barriers to the implementation of pharmacist prescribing for patients with CKD in the United Kingdom (UK).

METHOD

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with UK Renal Pharmacy Group members who were independent prescribers. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) underpinned the interview schedule. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and independently coded by two researchers. A thematic approach was used for analysis, with data generation continuing until saturation of themes. Ethical approval was granted.

RESULTS

Data saturation was achieved following 14 interviews. Most interviewees were female (n = 11), all had secondary care as their main practice setting, and were highly experienced prescribers with 8 having 11 or more years of prescribing practice. Interviewees were positive regarding the development of their prescribing practice. Facilitators and barriers emerged across all 5 of the CFIR domains. Key facilitators were aspects of inner setting (e.g., organisational support and communication) while key barriers were also related to inner setting, specifically the need for adequate structural and financial resources.

CONCLUSION

This theory-based study has illuminated the facilitators and barriers for the implementation of pharmacist prescribing in CKD. There is a need to consider the resources required for implementation of prescribing practice at an early stage of planning and development.

Non-medical prescribing in critical care: A mixed methods study

BACKGROUND

Little is known about non-medical prescribers in critical care in the United Kingdom. In 2007, a small survey identified few non-medical prescribers; however, in the intervening years, there have been many changes to the Medicine Act 1968. It is likely that prescribing within the non-medical workforce in critical care has changed significantly.

AIM/S

This survey aimed to explore the breadth and diversity of prescribing practices of non-medical prescribers working within the wider critical care environment in the United Kingdom.

METHOD

Data were collected via an online questionnaire adapted from the 2007 version and distributed by the BACCN to their members between 26th October 2021 and 19th November 2021. Freedom of Information requests were made to the Nursing and Midwifery Council, The Health and Care Professions Council and the General Pharmaceutical Council to understand the number of non-medical prescribers.

RESULTS

The survey elicited 259 responses; 105 respondents identified themselves as non-medical prescribers, and 57 used Patient Group Directions only. In the ICU/HDU, 75 respondents identified as non-medical prescribers, with an additional 45 using Patient Group Directions.

CONCLUSION

Since the last survey, there has been a large increase in the number and representation across all professional groups identifying as a non-medical prescriber and/or utilising patient group directions across critical care. Many staff responded to this survey who were neither NMPs nor utilising PGDs; of these, a large proportion were interested in taking on this additional responsibility.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Many people working within critical care are interested in becoming non-medical prescribers. Assists with understanding characteristics of those working as non-medical prescribers within critical care. Shows variations in practice in respect to PGDs, authorising of blood products and prescribing.

A literature review of human factors and ergonomics within the pharmacy dispensing process

BACKGROUND

Within healthcare, Human Factors explores the fit between people and their working environment to improve safety, performance and wellbeing. The pharmacy setting is an area of particular interest considering the high-risk nature of the work activities in relation to dispensing errors. Internationally, the pharmacy setting is experiencing significant workforce changes, including the introduction of pharmacy technicians performing accuracy checks, and the adoption of novel technologies such as automated dispensing.

OBJECTIVE

A literature review was conducted to identify studies which have explored the pharmacy dispensing process from a Human Factors perspective.

METHODS

The databases Medline, EMBASE and PsycINFO were searched on the 27th of November 2018. All study designs were eligible for inclusion from community and hospital settings. Key study findings were extracted and reported using a descriptive narrative synthesis method.

RESULTS

Thirty-two studies were identified, with most published from 2010 onwards. The review identified that a myriad of aspects influence safety within the dispensing process; that the dispensing process is complex in nature and can be depicted in many different ways; and lastly, that deviations from intended practice appear commonplace. Most studies used two or more data collection sources, and various theories, models and frameworks were applied. Although the focus of all studies was within the wider domain of Human Factors, 14 studies did not explicitly refer to a Human Factors approach within the manuscript.

CONCLUSIONS

The complexity of the pharmacy dispensing setting suggests that adopting a Human Factors approach to explore this context is appropriate. Future Human Factors research should explore the implementation of new technology and services and focus on obtaining empirical evidence that adopting a Human Factors approach improves safety and/or efficiency within pharmacy practice. Clear guidance on how to apply the range of Human Factors approaches would help support such research and facilitate the development of sound theory.