Diagnosis of cauda equina syndrome in the emergency department

Payer Status and Racial Disparities in Time to Surgery for Emergent Orthopaedic Procedures

INTRODUCTION

Delay in surgical management for orthopaedic emergencies and severe fracture types can result in notable morbidity and even mortality for patients. Disparities in various facets of orthopaedic care have been identified based on race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and payer status, but disparities in time to surgery have been poorly explored. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to investigate whether disparities exist in time to emergent orthopaedic surgery.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgery for hip fracture, femur fracture, pelvic fracture, septic knee, septic hip, or cauda equina syndrome over 2012 to 2020 were identified using national data. Multivariable linear regression models were constructed, controlling for age, sex, race/ethnicity, payer status, socioeconomic status, hospital setting, and comorbidities to examine the effect of payer status and race/ethnicity, on time to surgery.

RESULTS

Over 2012 to 2020, 247,370 patients underwent surgery for hip fracture, 64,827 for femur fracture, 14,130 for pelvic fracture, 14,979 for septic knee, 3,205 for septic hip, and 4,730 for cauda equina syndrome. On multivariable analysis, patients with Medicaid experienced significantly longer time to surgery for hip fracture, femur fracture, pelvic fracture, septic knee, and cauda equina syndrome ( P < 0.05 all). Black patients experienced longer time to surgery for hip fracture, femur fracture, septic knee, septic hip, and cauda equina syndrome, and Hispanic patients experienced longer time to surgery for hip fracture, femur fracture, pelvic fracture, and cauda equina syndrome ( P < 0.05 all).

DISCUSSION

The results of this study demonstrate that Medicaid-insured patients, and often minority patients, experience longer delays to surgery than privately insured and White patients. Future work should endeavor to identify causes of these disparities to promote creation of policies aimed at improving timely access to care for Medicaid-insured and minority patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Best Evidence Topic report: Is a CT head required for patients who present to the emergency department with a first seizure?

A short systematic review was undertaken to assess whether adult patients presenting to the ED with a first seizure require a CT head scan to rule out emergent intracranial pathology. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane and Google Scholar databases were searched. Seven relevant papers were identified. Study information, patient characteristics, key results and methodological weaknesses were tabulated. Our results indicate that adults presenting with a first seizure are a high-yield group for CT with a number needed to scan (NNS) between 10 and 19 for findings that would change management in ED, such as haemorrhage, infarction and tumours. We believe that this NNS is sufficiently low to justify the routine use of neuroimaging for these patients in emergency care.

A novel approach to expedite emergency investigation for suspected cauda equina syndrome referrals from community and primary care services: A service evaluation

INTRODUCTION

Although a rare spinal emergency, cauda equina syndrome (CES) can result in significant physical, emotional, and psychological sequalae. Introducing a CES pathway enhances diagnosis but may increase Radiology and Orthopaedic workload. To address this, one NHS hospital in England introduced a novel CES pathway. Utilising a criteria-led pathway, patients were referred directly from community/primary care, via the Emergency Department, for an emergency MRI scan.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes of patients referred via an original and redesigned Community and Primary Care CES pathway.

DESIGN

A retrospective service evaluation was undertaken of all emergency MRI scans investigating suspected CES via either pathway.

METHODS

Two 3-month time periods were analysed; pre-(original) and post-implementation of the redesigned pathway; time to surgery was reviewed over two 12-month periods.

RESULTS

Increased MRI scan utilisation was seen following the implementation of the redesigned pathway: original n = 50, redesigned n = 128, increasing Radiology workload. However, the redesigned pathway resulted in a reduction in time to MRI from 3h:01m to 1h:02m; reduction in time spent in ED 4h:55m to 3h:24m; reduction in time to surgery 18h:05m to 13h:38m; reduction in out-of-hour scanning from 10 to 2 patients during the evaluation period; and a reduction in on-call Orthopaedic involvement by 38%.

CONCLUSION

All timed outcomes were improved with the implementation of this novel pathway. This suggests expediting MRI scans can result in substantial downstream benefits; albeit while increasing MRI scan utilisation. This pathway aligns with the emergency management of suspected CES under the new national CES pathway in England.

How to assess the long-term recovery outcomes of patients with cauda equina syndrome before surgery: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Factors influencing recovery after decompression surgery for cauda equina syndrome (CES) are not completely identified. The authors aimed to investigate the most valuable predictors (MVPs) of poor postoperative recovery (PPR) in patients with CES and construct a nomogram for discerning those who will experience PPR.

METHODS

Three hundred fifty-six patients with CES secondary to lumbar degenerative diseases treated at Xijing Hospital were randomly divided into training ( N =238) and validation ( N =118) cohorts at a 2:1 ratio. Moreover, 92 patients from the 970 th Hospital composed the testing cohort. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression (LASSO) was used for selecting MVPs. The nomogram was developed by integrating coefficients of MVPs in the logistic regression, and its discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility were validated in all three cohorts.

RESULTS

After 3 to 5 years of follow-up, the residual rates of bladder dysfunction, bowel dysfunction, sexual dysfunction, and saddle anesthesia were 41.9, 44.1, 63.7, and 29.0%, respectively. MVPs included stress urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, low stream, difficult defecation, fecal incontinence, and saddle anesthesia in order. The discriminatory ability of the nomogram was up to 0.896, 0.919, and 0.848 in the training, validation, and testing cohorts, respectively. Besides, the nomogram showed good calibration and clinical utility in all cohorts. Furthermore, the optimal cutoff value of the nomogram score for distinguishing those who will experience PPR was 148.02, above which postoperative outcomes tend to be poor.

CONCLUSION

The first pretreatment nomogram for discerning CES patients who will experience PPR was developed and validated, which will aid clinicians in clinical decision-making.

Recovery with posterior decompression and dural suturing in a patient with cauda equina syndrome caused by lamina entrapment in an unstable burst fracture: A case report

INTRODUCTION

This report investigates Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES), a critical neurological condition from lumbar and sacral nerve root compression that arises from trauma, such as unstable burst fractures leading to interlaminar entrapment. This study highlights the effective management and recovery of a young woman with CES following a traumatic fall, offering new insights into the condition's treatment and recovery process.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 24-year-old female experienced severe lower back pain, bilateral lower limb weakness, saddle anesthesia, and bladder dysfunction after a 3-m fall. The neurological assessment showed reduced sensation and motor function in the lower extremities. Diagnostic imaging revealed an unstable L2 burst fracture with cauda equina entrapment. She underwent emergency posterior decompression and dural repair, followed by a tailored rehabilitation program, which is a novel aspect of this study.

DISCUSSION

This report underscores the critical need for immediate surgical intervention in CES to avert lasting neurological damage. The case represents the significance of early decompression for improving prognosis and explores the complexities of managing CES with unstable spinal fractures and dural tears. It demonstrates the challenges in surgical intervention and postoperative rehabilitation, offering a new perspective on the integrative approach to treatment.

CONCLUSION

This case exemplifies the imperative CES management post-spinal trauma. Despite severe initial deficits, an innovative multidisciplinary approach involving surgery and early rehabilitation resulted in remarkable functional recovery. This study contributes to a new understanding of CES management in acute trauma settings and calls for further research to advance treatment protocols and enhance predictive outcomes.