1
|
Schafer K, Goldschmidt E, Oostra D, Kaminski B, Mattin M, Lurie F. Defining the Role of Risk Stratification and Duplex Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Acute Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2022; 10:1021-1027. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2022.02.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
2
|
Jain N, Avanthika C, Singh A, Jhaveri S, De la Hoz I, Hassen G, Camacho L GP, Carrera KG. Deep Vein Thrombosis in Intravenous Drug Users: An Invisible Global Health Burden. Cureus 2021; 13:e18457. [PMID: 34745781 PMCID: PMC8563142 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.18457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The prevalence of intravenous drug use has increased in the past decade and it represents an important risk factor for deep vein thrombosis. Intravenous drug use is a global problem, with the main culprit being heroin. Peer pressure and poverty in high-risk groups such as sex workers, females, and young adults raise the risk of intravenous drug use, which expresses itself in the form of venous thromboembolism eventually. Deep vein thrombosis typically manifests itself eight years after the initial intravenous drug administration, rendering it a silent killer. Aiming to review and summarize existing articles in this context, we performed an exhaustive literature search online on PubMed and Google Scholar indexes using the keywords "Deep Venous Thrombosis (DVT)" and "Intravenous Drug Users (IVDU)." English articles that addressed epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, management, and outcomes of DVT, including those in IVDU, were selected and analyzed. The pathogenesis of DVT development in IVDU is mainly attributed to the interplay of trauma to the vessel by repeated injection and the injected drug itself. The right-sided femoral vein is the most common vein affected. Prevalent clinical presentations include local pain, swelling, and redness with typical systemic symptoms including fever, cough, dyspnea, and chest pain on top of addiction features. There appeared to be a delay in reporting symptoms, which was most likely due to the social stigma attached to IVDU. There are over 50 conditions that present with swollen and painful limbs comparable to DVT in IVDU, making precise diagnosis critical for timely treatment. Venous ultrasound is the method of choice for diagnosing DVT. Extended anticoagulant therapy with low-molecular-weight heparin combined with warfarin is the recommended treatment. Intravenous drug abusers having DVT are affected by multiple complications and poorer outcomes such as slower recovery, recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), and a longer hospital stay, which put them at higher risk of morbidity, mortality, reduced productivity, and economic burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nidhi Jain
- Medicine and Surgery, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Dehradun, IND
- Internal Medicine, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Delhi, IND
- Hematology and Oncology, Brooklyn Cancer Care, Brooklyn, USA
| | | | - Abhishek Singh
- Internal Medicine, Mount Sinai Morningside, New York, USA
| | - Sharan Jhaveri
- Internal Medicine, Smt. Nathiba Hargovandas Lakhmichand Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, IND
| | | | - Gashaw Hassen
- Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, ITA
- Medicine, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, ETH
- Progressive Care Unit, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, USA
| | - Genesis P Camacho L
- Division de Estudios para Graduados, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad del Zulia, Maracaibo, VEN
| | - Keila G Carrera
- Gastroenterology, Universidad de Oriente (VEN), Maturin, VEN
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kainz B, Heinrich MP, Makropoulos A, Oppenheimer J, Mandegaran R, Sankar S, Deane C, Mischkewitz S, Al-Noor F, Rawdin AC, Ruttloff A, Stevenson MD, Klein-Weigel P, Curry N. Non-invasive diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis from ultrasound imaging with machine learning. NPJ Digit Med 2021; 4:137. [PMID: 34526639 PMCID: PMC8443708 DOI: 10.1038/s41746-021-00503-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a blood clot most commonly found in the leg, which can lead to fatal pulmonary embolism (PE). Compression ultrasound of the legs is the diagnostic gold standard, leading to a definitive diagnosis. However, many patients with possible symptoms are not found to have a DVT, resulting in long referral waiting times for patients and a large clinical burden for specialists. Thus, diagnosis at the point of care by non-specialists is desired. We collect images in a pre-clinical study and investigate a deep learning approach for the automatic interpretation of compression ultrasound images. Our method provides guidance for free-hand ultrasound and aids non-specialists in detecting DVT. We train a deep learning algorithm on ultrasound videos from 255 volunteers and evaluate on a sample size of 53 prospectively enrolled patients from an NHS DVT diagnostic clinic and 30 prospectively enrolled patients from a German DVT clinic. Algorithmic DVT diagnosis performance results in a sensitivity within a 95% CI range of (0.82, 0.94), specificity of (0.70, 0.82), a positive predictive value of (0.65, 0.89), and a negative predictive value of (0.99, 1.00) when compared to the clinical gold standard. To assess the potential benefits of this technology in healthcare we evaluate the entire clinical DVT decision algorithm and provide cost analysis when integrating our approach into diagnostic pathways for DVT. Our approach is estimated to generate a positive net monetary benefit at costs up to £72 to £175 per software-supported examination, assuming a willingness to pay of £20,000/QALY.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernhard Kainz
- ThinkSono Ltd, London, UK.
- Imperial College London, London, UK.
- FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
- King's College London, London, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Andrew C Rawdin
- The University of Sheffield, School of Health and Related Research, Sheffield, UK
| | - Andreas Ruttloff
- Clinic of Angiology - Interdisciplinary Center of Vascular Medicine, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Matthew D Stevenson
- The University of Sheffield, School of Health and Related Research, Sheffield, UK
| | - Peter Klein-Weigel
- Clinic of Angiology - Interdisciplinary Center of Vascular Medicine, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Nicola Curry
- Oxford Haemophilia and Thrombosis Centre, Headington, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gaitini D, Khoury R, Israelit S, Beck-Razi N. Sparing ultrasound in emergency department patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis by using clinical scores and D-dimer testing. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND : JCU 2016; 44:231-239. [PMID: 26666631 DOI: 10.1002/jcu.22317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2015] [Revised: 09/11/2015] [Accepted: 09/22/2015] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate compliance with a management strategy for use in emergency department (ED) patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) based on Wells score (WS), D-dimer concentrations, and sonographic (US) examinations. METHODS Retrospective and prospective data on risk factors, physical examination findings, D-dimer concentrations, and US results were collected and reviewed. The prevalence of DVT for each WS category and D-dimer level was calculated. RESULTS In the retrospective part of the study, 475 consecutive patients were included. Patients' risk for DVT was scored as high (n = 129 [27.2%]), moderate (n = 95 [20%]), or low (n = 251 [52.8%]). D-Dimer test results were available for 34 (7.2%) of the patients. DVT was diagnosed in 105 (22.1%) patients: 99 (76.7%) at high, 4 (4.2%) at moderate, and 2 (0.8%) at low risk. The mean D-dimer concentration was 3,071.7 ng/ml in patients with DVT. In the prospective part of the study, 50 patients were enrolled. Their risk levels for DVT were scored as high (n = 23 [46%]), moderate (n = 7 [14%]), and low (n = 20 [40%]). D-Dimer testing was performed in all patients. The mean D-dimer concentration was 2,966.9 ng/ml in patients with DVT. DVT was diagnosed in 13 (26%) of these 50 patients: 12 (52.2%) at high and 1 (14.3%) at moderate risk for DVT. No patients in the low-risk group and with normal D-dimer concentrations had DVT. CONCLUSIONS We identified significant correlation between WS, D-dimer concentration, and diagnosis of DVT on US examination. DVT can be excluded with certainty in patients admitted to the ED with a low-risk score for DVT and a negative D-dimer concentration, thus avoiding the need for performing US examinations. A low level of compliance with this management strategy was found in our ED.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Gaitini
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rambam Health Care Center, Haifa, Israel
- Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Rasha Khoury
- Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Shlomo Israelit
- Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Rambam Health Care Center, Haifa, Israel
| | - Nira Beck-Razi
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rambam Health Care Center, Haifa, Israel
- Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schuur JD, Baugh CW, Hess EP, Hilton JA, Pines JM, Asplin BR. Critical pathways for post-emergency outpatient diagnosis and treatment: tools to improve the value of emergency care. Acad Emerg Med 2011; 18:e52-63. [PMID: 21676050 PMCID: PMC3717297 DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01096.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The decision to admit a patient to the hospital after an emergency department (ED) visit is expensive, frequently not evidence-based, and variable. Outpatient critical pathways are a promising approach to reduce hospital admission after emergency care. Critical pathways exist to risk stratify patients for potentially serious diagnoses (e.g., acute myocardial infarction [AMI]) or evaluate response to therapy (e.g., community-acquired pneumonia) within a short time period (i.e., less than 36 hours), to determine if further hospital-based acute care is needed. Yet, such pathways are variably used while many patients are admitted for conditions for which they could be treated as outpatients. In this article, the authors propose a model of post-ED critical pathways, describe their role in emergency care, list common diagnoses that are amenable to critical pathways in the outpatient setting, and propose a research agenda to address barriers and solutions to increase the use of outpatient critical pathways. If emergency providers are to routinely conduct rapid evaluations in outpatient or observation settings, they must have several conditions at their disposal: 1) evidence-based tools to accurately risk stratify patients for protocolized care, 2) systems of care that reliably facilitate workup in the outpatient setting, and 3) a medical environment conducive to noninpatient pathways, with aligned risks and incentives among patients, providers, and payers. Increased use of critical pathways after emergency care is a potential way to improve the value of emergency care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremiah D Schuur
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
van der Velde EF, Toll DB, Ten Cate-Hoek AJ, Oudega R, Stoffers HEJH, Bossuyt PM, Büller HR, Prins MH, Hoes AW, Moons KGM, van Weert HCPM. Comparing the diagnostic performance of 2 clinical decision rules to rule out deep vein thrombosis in primary care patients. Ann Fam Med 2011; 9:31-6. [PMID: 21242558 PMCID: PMC3022042 DOI: 10.1370/afm.1198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The Wells rule is widely used for clinical assessment of patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT), especially in the secondary care setting. Recently a new clinical decision rule for primary care patients (the primary care rule) has been proposed, because the Wells rule is not sufficient to rule out DVT in this setting. The objective was to compare the ability of both rules to safely rule out DVT and to efficiently reduce the number of referrals for leg ultrasound investigation that would result in a negative finding. METHODS Family physicians collected data on 1,086 patients to calculate the scores for both decision rules before leg ultrasonography was performed. In all patients D-dimer (dimerized plasmin fragment D) testing was performed using a rapid point-of-care assay. Patients were stratified into risk categories defined by each rule and the D-dimer result. Outcomes were DVT (diagnosed by ultrasonography) and venous thromboembolic complications or death caused by a possible thromboembolic event during a 90-day follow-up period. We calculated the differences between the 2 rules in the number of missed diagnoses and the proportions of patients that needed ultrasound testing. RESULTS Data from 1,002 eligible patients were used for this analysis. A venous thromboembolic event occurred during follow-up in 7 patients with a low score and negative D-dimer finding, both with the Wells rule (7 of 447; 1.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7%-3.3% ) and the primary care rule (7 of 495; 1.4%; 95% CI, 0.6%-3.0%). Using the Wells rule, 447 patients (45%) would not need referral for further testing compared with 495 patients (49%) when using the primary care rule (McNemar P <.001). CONCLUSIONS In primary care, suspected DVT can safely be ruled out using either of the 2 rules in combination with a point-of-care D-dimer test. Both rules can reduce unnecessary referrals for compression ultrasonography by about 50%, though the primary care rule reduces it slightly more.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eit Frits van der Velde
- Department of General Practice, Vascular Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
AIMS To identify the proportion of patients testing positive for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) who are injecting drug users (IDUs), and examine differences in the investigation and management of this group compared with non-IDUs. METHODS Analysis of data collected from emergency department records and a review of patient notes. RESULTS All patients in this study who were known to inject recreational drugs tested positive for DVT on Doppler ultrasound scan. CONCLUSIONS IDUs should be considered at high risk of developing DVT and should be investigated accordingly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V A Cooke
- The Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK. [corrected]
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Duriseti RS, Shachter RD, Brandeau ML. Value of quantitative D-dimer assays in identifying pulmonary embolism: implications from a sequential decision model. Acad Emerg Med 2006; 13:755-66. [PMID: 16723725 DOI: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine the cost-effectiveness of a quantitative D-dimer assay for the evaluation of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) in an urban emergency department (ED). METHODS The authors analyzed different diagnostic strategies over pretest risk categories on the basis of Wells criteria by using the performance profile of the ELISA D-dimer assay (over five cutoff values) and imaging strategies used in the ED for PE: compression ultrasound (CUS), ventilation-perfusion (VQ) scan (over three cutoff values), CUS with VQ (over three cutoff values), computed tomography (CT) angiogram (CTA) with pulmonary portion (CTP) and lower-extremity venous portion, and CUS with CTP. Data used in the analysis were based on literature review. Incremental costs and quality-adjusted-life-years were the outcomes measured. RESULTS Computed tomography angiogram with pulmonary portion and lower-extremity venous portion without D-dimer was the preferred strategy. CUS-VQ scanning always was dominated by CT-based strategies. When CTA was infeasible, the dominant strategy was D-dimer with CUS-VQ in moderate- and high-Wells patients and was D-dimer with CUS for low-Wells patients. When CTP specificity falls below 80%, or if its overall performance is markedly degraded, preferred strategies include D-dimer testing. Sensitivity analyses suggest that pessimistic assessments of CTP accuracy alter the results only at extremes of parameter settings. CONCLUSIONS In patients in whom PE is suspected, when CTA is available, even the most sensitive quantitative D-dimer assay is not likely to be cost-effective. When CTA is not available or if its performance is markedly degraded, use of the D-dimer assay has value in combination with CUS and a pulmonary imaging study. These conclusions may not hold for the larger domain of patients presenting to the ED with chest pain or shortness of breath in whom PE is one of many competing diagnoses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ram S Duriseti
- Department of Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, CA 94304, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Goodacre S, Sampson FC, Sutton AJ, Mason S, Morris F. Variation in the diagnostic performance of D-dimer for suspected deep vein thrombosis. QJM 2005; 98:513-27. [PMID: 15955795 DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hci085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Numerous studies have evaluated the accuracy of D-dimer in diagnosing suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT), but results are conflicting. AIM To overview estimates of the diagnostic accuracy of D-dimer and identify causes of variation. DESIGN Systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. METHODS We searched Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Database of Reviews of Effectiveness, the ACP Journal Club, citation lists, and contacted manufacturers. We selected studies that compared D-dimer to a reference standard in patients with suspected DVT. Data were analysed by random effects meta-analysis and meta-regression. RESULTS We included 97 studies reporting 198 assays in 99 different patient groups. Overall estimated sensitivity and specificity of D-dimer were 90.5% and 54.7%, but both estimates were subject to significant heterogeneity (p < 0.001). Meta-regression identified that some heterogeneity was explained by study setting, exclusion criteria, whether recruitment was consecutive or the study prospective, whether D-dimer and the reference standard were measured blind, and whether the D-dimer threshold was determined a priori. Sensitivity and specificity also varied between ELISA (94% and 45% respectively), latex (89% and 55%) and whole blood agglutination assays (87% and 68%). Sensitivity was higher for proximal than distal DVT. Specificity was dependent upon whether clinical probability of DVT was high (specificity 51%), intermediate (67%) or low (78%). DISCUSSION D-dimer has good sensitivity, but poor specificity, for DVT. Estimates are subject to substantial heterogeneity from various sources. D-dimer specificity appears to be strongly dependent upon the pre-test clinical probability of DVT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Goodacre
- Medical Care Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|