New Barrett's oesophagus surveillance guidelines: significant cost savings over the next 10 years on implementation

Developing patient-orientated Barrett's oesophagus services: the role of dedicated services

Introduction

Barrett’s oesophagus (BO) is common and is a precursor to oesophageal adenocarcinoma with a 0.33% per annum risk of progression. Surveillance and follow-up services for BO have been shown to be lacking, with studies showing inadequate adherence to guidelines and patients reporting a need for greater disease-specific knowledge. This review explores the emerging role of dedicated services for patients with BO.

Methods

A literature search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, HMIC, BNI, CiNAHL, AMED and PsycINFO in regard to dedicated BO care pathways was undertaken.

Results

Prospective multicentre and randomised trials were lacking. Published cohort data are encouraging with improvements in guideline adherence with dedicated services, with one published study showing significant improvements in dysplasia detection rates. Accuracy of allocation to surveillance endoscopy has been shown to hold cost savings, and a study of a dedicated clinic showed increased discharges from unnecessary surveillance. Training modalities for BO surveillance and dysplasia detection exist, which could be used to educate a BO workforce. Qualitative and quantitative studies have shown patients report high levels of cancer worry and poor disease-specific knowledge, but few studies have explored follow-up care models despite being a patient and clinician priority for research.

Conclusions

Cost–benefit analysis for dedicated services, considering both financial and environmental impacts, and more robust clinical data must be obtained to support this model of care in the wider health service. Greater understanding is needed of the root causes for poor guideline adherence, and disease-specific models of care should be designed around clinical and patient-reported outcomes to address the unmet needs of patients with BO.

Monitoring the premalignant potential of Barrett's oesophagus'

The landscape for patients with Barrett's oesophagus (BE) has changed significantly in the last decade. Research and new guidelines have helped gastroenterologists to better identify those patients with BE who are particularly at risk of developing oesophageal adenocarcinoma. In parallel, developments in endoscopic image enhancement technology and optical biopsy techniques have improved our ability to detect high-risk lesions. Once these lesions have been identified, the improvements in minimally invasive endoscopic therapies has meant that these patients can potentially be cured of early cancer and high-risk dysplastic lesions without the need for surgery, which still has a significant morbidity and mortality. The importance of reaching an accurate diagnosis of BE remains of paramount importance. More work is needed, however. The vast majority of those undergoing surveillance for their BE do not progress towards cancer and thus undergo a regular invasive procedure, which may impact on their psychological and physical well-being while incurring significant cost to the health service. New work that explores cheaper endoscopic or non-invasive ways to identify the at-risk individual provides exciting avenues for research. In future, the diagnosis and monitoring of patients with BE could move away from hospitals and into primary care.

Differences in intestinal metaplasia in Barrett's esophagus patients in an ethnically diverse south London population

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the replacement of any portion of the normal distal squamous epithelial mucosa by metaplastic columnar epithelium and is the only known precursor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. We undertook a study to identify ethnic differences for the presence of intestinal metaplasia (IM) in BE in patients in an ethnically diverse south London population. Retrospective analysis was done using the endoscopy database of St George's Hospital NHS Trust, which serves a large ethnically diverse London population. Gastroscopy records between 2009 and 2012 were retrieved, and patients with an endoscopic diagnosis of BE were identified. Patients of Indian subcontinent Asian origin (ISCA) were further identified. The presence of IM was retrieved from hospital pathology databases and was the primary outcome measured. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the odds of having IM by ethnic origin. ISCAs were 70% less likely to have IM compared to non-ISCAs (OR 0.32, 95% CI: 0.16-0.61, p = 0.001). This is the first study to identify differences in histological findings in ISCAs with BE living in the UK. Our findings may be useful for the future risk stratification of BE patients. Identification of environmental factors responsible for this difference would be of great therapeutic value.