1
|
Storr M, Gross M, Madisch A, von Arnim U, Mönnikes H, Walters J, Krammer H, Keller J. Chologene Diarrhö, Stiefkind der chronischen Diarrhö
– Prävalenz, Diagnostik und Therapie. AKTUELLE ERNÄHRUNGSMEDIZIN 2022. [DOI: 10.1055/a-1923-0760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Die chologene Diarrhö ist eine der häufigsten nicht
diagnostizierten Ursachen der chronischen Diarrhö, der zahlreiche
verschiedene Pathophysiologien zugrunde liegen können. Auch nach
Ausschlussdiagnostik der häufigeren Ursachen verbleiben bis zu
5% der Bevölkerung von einer ungeklärten chronischen
Diarrhö betroffen. In diesem Kollektiv findet sich in bis zu 50%
als Ursache eine chologene Diarrhö.
Collapse
|
2
|
Westwood M, Ramos IC, Armstrong N, Ryczek E, Penton H, Holleman M, Noake C, Al M. SeHCAT (tauroselcholic [75selenium] acid) for the investigation of bile acid diarrhoea in adults: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess 2022. [DOI: 10.3310/jtfo0945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Tauroselcholic [75selenium] acid (SeHCAT™) (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) is a radiopharmaceutical that may be useful in diagnosing bile acid diarrhoea.
Objectives
To assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of SeHCAT for the investigation of adults with chronic unexplained diarrhoea, diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome or functional diarrhoea (suspected primary bile acid diarrhoea), and adults with chronic diarrhoea and Crohn’s disease who have not undergone ileal resection (suspected secondary bile acid diarrhoea).
Methods
Sixteen databases were searched to November 2020. The review process included measures to minimise error and bias. Results were summarised by primary or secondary bile acid diarrhoea and study quality was considered. The cost-effectiveness analysis combined a short-term (6-month) decision-analytic model (diagnosis and initial treatment response) and a lifetime Markov model comprising three health states (diarrhoea, no diarrhoea and death), with transitions determined by probabilities of response to treatment. Analyses were conducted from an NHS and Personal Social Services perspective.
Results
Twenty-four studies were included in this review. Of these, 21 were observational studies, reporting some outcome data for patients treated with bile acid sequestrants, and in which only patients with a positive SeHCAT test were offered bile acid sequestrants. The median rate of response to bile acid sequestrants, among patients with a 7-day SeHCAT retention value of ≤ 15%, was 68% (range 38–86%) (eight studies). The estimated sensitivity of SeHCAT (≤ 15% threshold) to predict positive response to colestyramine was 100% (95% confidence interval 54.1% to 100%) and the specificity estimate was 91.2% (95% confidence interval 76.3% to 98.1%) (one study). The median proportion of treated patients who were intolerant/discontinued bile acid sequestrants was 15% (range 4–27%) (eight studies). There was insufficient information to determine whether or not intolerance varied between colestyramine, colestipol and colesevelam. For both populations, the SeHCAT 15% (i.e. a SeHCAT retention value of ≤ 15%) strategy dominated other strategies or resulted in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of < £20,000–30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. For the suspected primary bile acid diarrhoea population, SeHCAT 15% was the strategy most likely to be cost-effective: 67% and 73% probability at threshold incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of £20,000 and £30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, respectively. For the Crohn’s disease population, these probabilities were 89% and 92% at £20,000 and £30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, respectively. Cost-effectiveness was mostly led by treatment response. SeHCAT 15% was the strategy with the highest response rate in the majority of scenarios explored.
Limitations and conclusions
There is a lack of evidence linking the use of SeHCAT testing to patient-relevant outcomes. The optimal SeHCAT threshold, to define bile acid diarrhoea and select patients for treatment with bile acid sequestrants, is uncertain. It is unclear whether or not patients with ‘borderline’ or ‘equivocal’ 7-day SeHCAT retention values (e.g. between 10% and 15%) and patients with values of > 15% could benefit from treatment with bile acid sequestrants. Although the results of the economic evaluation conducted for both populations indicated that the SeHCAT 15% strategy dominated the other two strategies or resulted in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios that were lower than the common thresholds of £20,000 or £30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, the paucity and poor quality of evidence mean that uncertainty is high.
Future work
The optimum study design would be a multiarm randomised controlled trial, in which participants meeting the inclusion criteria are randomised to receive colestyramine, colestipol, colesevelam or placebo, and all participants receive SeHCAT testing.
Study registration
This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42020223877.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (IHR) Evidence Synthesis programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 26, No. 45. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Isaac Corro Ramos
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Hannah Penton
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marscha Holleman
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Caro Noake
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK
| | - Maiwenn Al
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vijayvargiya P, Breen-Lyles M, Nord SL, Maselli D, Busciglio I, Boinpally R, Muslin A, Carrothers TJ, Camilleri M. Safety and Efficacy of Eluxadoline in Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Diarrhea With or Without Bile Acid Diarrhea: Open-Label Study. Dig Dis Sci 2022; 67:3911-3921. [PMID: 35122592 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-022-07379-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eluxadoline, a peripherally acting, mixed µ- and κ-opioid receptor (OR) agonist and δ-OR antagonist, is approved for treatment of adults with irritable bowel syndrome-diarrhea (IBS-D). About a third of IBS-D patients has bile acid diarrhea (BAD); opioids may stimulate TGR5 (bile acid) receptors. AIM To evaluate eluxadoline's efficacy on altered bowel functions and safety in IBS-D patients with or without BAD. METHODS In a single-center, phase 4, parallel-group, open-label study, patients with IBS-D (cohort 1) and patients with BAD were treated with eluxadoline, 100 mg tablets BID, with food for 4 weeks. Patients recorded bowel functions by electronic daily diary. BAD was based on fasting serum 7αC4 (> 52.5 ng/mL) or concurrent criteria of increased total or primary fecal BAs excreted in 48 h. We assessed efficacy on treatment compared to baseline in the two cohorts. Primary outcome measures were changes from baseline in average stool consistency Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) score (range 1-7) and safety. RESULTS Mean changes from baseline in cohorts 1 and 2 (data presented in this order) were similar for: BSFS score averaged over 4 weeks' treatment (- 1.25 and - 1.09); daily bowel movement frequency (- 1.48 and - 0.79); daily urgent bowel movements (- 0.52 and - 0.80); IBS-QoL (5.9 and 13.6); serum 7αC4 (- 5.59 and - 8.78 ng/mL). There were no deaths, serious treatment-emergent adverse events, or discontinuations due to adverse events during the study. CONCLUSION Eluxadoline is similarly efficacious in the treatment of IBS-D and BAD, and it appears to be safe and efficacious as documented in large clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priya Vijayvargiya
- Clinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research (CENTER), Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. S.W., Charlton Building, Rm. 8-110, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Margaret Breen-Lyles
- Clinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research (CENTER), Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. S.W., Charlton Building, Rm. 8-110, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Sara Linker Nord
- Clinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research (CENTER), Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. S.W., Charlton Building, Rm. 8-110, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Daniel Maselli
- Clinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research (CENTER), Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. S.W., Charlton Building, Rm. 8-110, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Irene Busciglio
- Clinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research (CENTER), Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. S.W., Charlton Building, Rm. 8-110, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Ramesh Boinpally
- Clinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research (CENTER), Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. S.W., Charlton Building, Rm. 8-110, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.,AbbVie Inc, Madison, NJ, USA
| | - Anna Muslin
- Clinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research (CENTER), Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. S.W., Charlton Building, Rm. 8-110, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.,AbbVie Inc, Madison, NJ, USA
| | | | - Michael Camilleri
- Clinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research (CENTER), Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. S.W., Charlton Building, Rm. 8-110, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Battat R, Sandborn WJ. Advances in the Comprehensive Management of Postoperative Crohn's Disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20:1436-1449. [PMID: 33819666 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.03.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 03/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Patients with postoperative Crohn's disease are difficult to manage because of their risk of experiencing a more severe course, multiple symptom confounders, and poor sensitivity of symptomatic remission to rule out intestinal inflammation. In this group, data are lacking on biologic therapeutic efficacy, and recommendations are lacking for those with multiple medication failures. Novel noninvasive testing can simultaneously exclude alternate causes of symptoms (serum C4, fecal fat, small intestinal bowel overgrowth breath testing) and assess intestinal inflammation (fecal calprotectin, endoscopic healing index). In addition, endoscopy-based disease activity assessment and management are required. Endoscopy should be performed within 6 months of surgery, and aggressive disease activity monitoring can be considered with colonoscopy every 1-2 years subsequently to ensure late recurrence is detected. Patients with multiple resections should be screened for short bowel syndrome. Predictive biomarkers are needed to guide medication selection in this high-risk population. Postoperative prophylactic biologic therapy is prudent for patients with preoperative biologic failure. However, there are no high-quality data to guide which agent should be selected. Selecting biologics with an alternative mechanism of action in those who had failed a biologic with adequate drug concentrations and selection of different agents in those with previous intolerance are reasonable. Significantly more study is required to assess the efficacy of therapies in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Battat
- Jill Roberts Center for IBD, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
| | - William J Sandborn
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sarchet D, Bold J. An opportunity for integrative approaches: bile acid diarrhoea and bile acid malabsorption. ADVANCES IN INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.aimed.2022.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
6
|
Camilleri M, Nurko S. Bile Acid Diarrhea in Adults and Adolescents. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2022; 34:e14287. [PMID: 34751982 PMCID: PMC8957499 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Revised: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bile acids are central to enterohepatic signaling pathways activated through natural receptors, farnesoid X receptor [FXR mediates synthesis of fibroblast growth factor-19 (FGF-19)], and G protein-coupled bile acid receptor 1 (GPBAR1, also known as TGR5). Although bile acid diarrhea (BAD) is more commonly encountered in ileal resection or disease, there is evidence documenting "idiopathic" BAD in about 20% of adolescents and 30% of adults presenting with chronic, non-bloody diarrhea often attributed to irritable bowel syndrome. Mechanism(s) leading to increased hepatic synthesis and colonic bile acid levels in "idiopathic" BAD include reduced synthesis of FGF-19 by the ileal mucosa, or genetic variation in hepatocyte proteins klotho β and FGF receptor 4 (FGFR4) that mediate negative feedback of bile acid synthesis. PURPOSE The objective of this review is to summarize the diagnosis of BAD in adults and adolescents. In addition to 75 SeHCAT retention for diagnosis of BAD, studies have validated fasting serum 7αC4 and FGF-19, respectively, by-product and inhibitor of hepatic bile acid synthesis, as well as fecal bile acid measurements. These assays are widely available through reference laboratories, and they are being simplified (eg, measurement of primary fecal bile acids in a random stool sample). BAD has also been identified as a co-factor contributing to persistent diarrhea in other diseases in remission including inflammatory bowel disease, microscopic colitis, celiac disease, and neuroendocrine tumors. In summary, advances in diagnosis of BAD provide opportunities for generalists and pediatric and adult gastroenterologists to provide targeted treatment for BAD presenting as chronic non-bloody diarrhea.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Camilleri
- Clinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research (C.E.N.T.E.R.) and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA
| | - Samuel Nurko
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology Boston Children’s Hospital Boston MA USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Berti G, Rettura F, Lambiase C, Bellini M. Empirical trial or diagnostic tests for bile acid diarrhea? That is the question! J Dig Dis 2021; 22:557-558. [PMID: 34415680 DOI: 10.1111/1751-2980.13044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ginevra Berti
- Department of New Technologies and Translational Research in Medicine and Surgery, Gastroenterology Unit, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Francesco Rettura
- Department of New Technologies and Translational Research in Medicine and Surgery, Gastroenterology Unit, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Christian Lambiase
- Department of New Technologies and Translational Research in Medicine and Surgery, Gastroenterology Unit, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Massimo Bellini
- Department of New Technologies and Translational Research in Medicine and Surgery, Gastroenterology Unit, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Storr M, Gross M, Madisch A, von Arnim U, Mönnikes H, Walters J, Krammer H, Keller J. [Bile acid diarrhea, stepchild of chronic diarrhea - prevalence, diagnosis and treatment. Update 2021]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2021; 59:580-591. [PMID: 33634438 DOI: 10.1055/a-1378-9627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Bile acid diarrhea is one of the most frequently undiagnosed causes of chronic diarrhea. A variety of different pathophysiologic causes can underlie chronic diarrhea. Even after exclusion of the more frequent causes, up to 5 % of the population remains affected by unexplained chronic diarrhea. In up to 50 % within this cohort, bile acid diarrhea is the underlying cause.The various pathophysiologies leading to bile acid diarrhea are well characterized. In this way, bile acid diarrhea can be divided into primary, secondary and tertiary subtypes. Common to all causes is the increased amount of bile acids in the colon and in the faeces and the resulting secretory-osmotic diarrhea, in more severe forms in combination with steatorrhea. The diagnosis of bile acid diarrhea follows a clear algorithm which, in addition to the search for the cause and possibly a therapeutic trial, recognizes the 75SeHCAT test as the reference method for the detection of an increased loss of bile acids. In view of the chronic nature of the symptoms and the need for permanent, lifelong therapy, the use of a one-time, reliable diagnostic test is justified, though the test is currently only available at a few centers. In addition to the treatment of identifiable underlying diseases, the current treatment includes the use of drugs that bind bile acids, with additional nutritional recommendations and vitamin substitutions.The present review article summarizes the pathophysiology and importance of bile acid diarrhea and discusses the current approach towards diagnosis and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Manfred Gross
- Internistisches Klinikum München Süd, Klinik für Gastroenterologie, München
| | - Ahmed Madisch
- Klinikum Siloah, Gastroenterologie, interventionelle Endoskopie, Diabetologie und Akutgeriatrie, Hannover
| | - Ulrike von Arnim
- Universitätsklinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum, Magdeburg
| | - Hubert Mönnikes
- Klinik für Innere Medizin, Martin Luther Krankenhaus, Berlin
| | | | - Heiner Krammer
- Praxis für Gastroenterologie und Ernährungsmedizin am Deutschen End- und Dickdarmzentrum Mannheim
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Flores V, Martínez-Lozano H, Bighelli F, Orcajo J, García-Lledó J, Alonso-Farto JC, Menchén L. Prevalence of biliary acid malabsorption in patients with chronic diarrhoea of functional characteristics: a prospective study. BMC Gastroenterol 2021; 21:56. [PMID: 33563227 PMCID: PMC7871394 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-021-01637-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Bile acid malabsorption occurs in up to one third of patients with chronic diarrhoea of functional characteristics. The gold standard test for its diagnosis is the 75Selenium homocholic acid taurine (75SeHCAT) test. The aim of this work is to confirm previous data suggesting that bile acid malabsorption, diagnosed by 75Se-HCAT test, is the underlying cause of diarrhoea in a significant proportion of patients previously diagnosed with a functional disorder. In addition, we have analysed the clinical response of bile acid sequestrants in those patients with a bile acid diarrhoea diagnosis. Methods This is a prospective, single-centre study including consecutive adult patients diagnosed with chronic diarrhoea of unknown origin and with functional characteristics; systematic rule out of common causes of chronic diarrhoea was performed before bile acid malabsorption evaluation by 75SeHCAT scanning. A retention percentage less than 10% was considered positive. Clinical response to cholestyramine was further evaluated in those patients with a positive diagnosis of bile acid diarrhoea Results 38 patients (20 male, mean age 37.5 years) were finally included. Twenty (52.6%) patients included had a positive 75SeHCAT test. Median body mass index was significantly higher in those patients. We did not find significant differences in other clinical or biochemical variables 75SeHCAT-positive and 75SeHCAT-negative groups. Only 6 of 17 (35.3%) patients responded to cholestyramine treatment; 10 patients did not have response or withdraw the drug due to adverse events. Logistic regression analysis showed that none of the included variables was a predictor of clinical response to cholestyramine. Conclusions Bile acid malabsorption occurs in a high proportion of patients suffering from chronic diarrhoea with functional characteristics. Systematic investigation of bile acid malabsorption should be included in the diagnostic algorithms of patients with chronic watery diarrhoea in the routine clinical practice. Absence of response to cholestyramine does not rule out bile acid diarrhoea.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Virginia Flores
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón - Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, C/ Dr. Esquerdo 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain
| | - Helena Martínez-Lozano
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón - Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, C/ Dr. Esquerdo 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain
| | - Federico Bighelli
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón - Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, C/ Dr. Esquerdo 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Orcajo
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón - Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier García-Lledó
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón - Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, C/ Dr. Esquerdo 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Carlos Alonso-Farto
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón - Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Menchén
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón - Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, C/ Dr. Esquerdo 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain. .,Departamento de Medicina, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas Y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. .,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas Y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Costa S, Gattoni S, Nicolardi ML, Costetti M, Maimaris S, Schiepatti A, Biagi F. Prevalence and clinical features of bile acid diarrhea in patients with chronic diarrhea. J Dig Dis 2021; 22:108-112. [PMID: 33438795 DOI: 10.1111/1751-2980.12969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Revised: 01/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Bile acid diarrhea is a form of chronic diarrhea caused by excessive bile reaching the colon. Conditions involving the terminal ileum and cholecystectomy are predisposing factors but an idiopathic form of bile acid diarrhea has also been described. In this study we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of bile acid diarrhea in patients consecutively evaluated for chronic diarrhea in an Outpatient Gastroenterology Clinic. METHODS Medical records of all patients admitted for chronic diarrhea (>4 weeks) between June 2018 and April 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Bile acid diarrhea was suspected in patients with ileal disease, cholecystectomy or post-prandial diarrhea. Patients' age at diagnosis, sex, presenting symptoms, results of main test and examinations, final diagnoses and date of last follow-up visit were also collected. Exclusion of chronic diarrhea of other causes and a 6-month clinical improvement with cholestyramine treatment confirmed the diagnosis of bile acid diarrhea. RESULTS In total, 139 patients aged 46 ± 20 years (76 women and 63 men) were included. Diarrhea due to an organic cause was diagnosed in 16 patients. A clinical response to cholestyramine persisting for more than 6 months led to a diagnosis of bile acid diarrhea in 39 (aged 52 ± 19 years) out of the remaining 123 patients with functional forms of diarrhea. Therefore, the prevalence of bile acid diarrhea was 28.1% (95% confidence interval 19.9%-38.4%) in patients with chronic diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS Bile acid diarrhea is a very common, yet under-recognized cause of chronic functional diarrhea. A therapeutic trial of cholestyramine is a valid diagnostic strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefania Costa
- Gastroenterology Unit of Pavia Institute, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Serena Gattoni
- Gastroenterology Unit of Pavia Institute, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Maria Luisa Nicolardi
- Gastroenterology Unit of Pavia Institute, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Martina Costetti
- Gastroenterology Unit of Pavia Institute, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Stiliano Maimaris
- Gastroenterology Unit of Pavia Institute, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Annalisa Schiepatti
- Gastroenterology Unit of Pavia Institute, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Federico Biagi
- Gastroenterology Unit of Pavia Institute, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
The overlap between irritable bowel syndrome and organic gastrointestinal diseases. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 6:139-148. [DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(20)30212-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Revised: 06/15/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
12
|
Camilleri M. Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Straightening the road from the Rome criteria. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2020; 32:e13957. [PMID: 32808411 PMCID: PMC7640950 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.13957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Revised: 06/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
A sequence of consensus-based Rome criteria for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) has been published since 1989. The fundamental definition based on abdominal pain in association with bowel dysfunction has been consistent. However, two major changes occurred in the Rome II and IV criteria. The former change involved "splitting off" of symptoms that were not consistently associated with pain, such as functional, constipation, diarrhea, and bloating. In Rome IV, the main changes were the exclusion of discomfort (in contrast to pain) and the more stringent frequency criteria for the pain to be eligible for diagnosis of IBS (specifically, on average, at least 1 day per week in the last 3 months). Validation studies of the consensus, symptom-based criteria have identified multiple deficiencies that question the rationale for "splitting" the different syndromes, and favor a simpler identification of the classical symptoms of abdominal pain, bowel dysfunction, and bloating, and exclusion of alarm symptoms. Advances in the identification of actionable biomarkers related to the symptoms suggestive of functional gastrointestinal disorders have the potential to usher a change in practice from positive diagnosis of symptom complexes followed by empirical treatment to identification of the mechanisms causing the symptoms and targeted therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Camilleri
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Clinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research (CENTER), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Vijayvargiya P, Camilleri M, Taylor A, Busciglio I, Loftus EV, Donato LJ. Combined Fasting Serum C4 and Primary Bile Acids From a Single Stool Sample to Diagnose Bile Acid Diarrhea. Gastroenterology 2020; 159:1952-1954.e2. [PMID: 32645316 PMCID: PMC7680346 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Revised: 06/19/2020] [Accepted: 07/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Priya Vijayvargiya
- Clinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research (C.E.N.T.E.R.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Michael Camilleri
- Clinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research (C.E.N.T.E.R.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| | - Ann Taylor
- Clinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research (C.E.N.T.E.R.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Irene Busciglio
- Clinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research (C.E.N.T.E.R.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Edward V. Loftus
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Leslie J. Donato
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Bile acids (BAs) are the central signals in enterohepatic communication, and they also integrate microbiota-derived signals into enterohepatic signaling. The tissue distribution and signaling pathways activated by BAs through natural receptors, farsenoid X receptor and G protein-coupled BA receptor 1 (GPBAR1, also known as Takeda G-coupled receptor 5), have led to a greater understanding of the mechanisms and potential therapeutic agents. BA diarrhea is most commonly encountered in ileal resection or disease, in idiopathic disorders (with presentation similar to functional diarrhea or irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea), and in association with malabsorption such as chronic pancreatitis or celiac disease. Diagnosis of BA diarrhea is based on Se-homocholic acid taurine retention, 48-hour fecal BA excretion, or serum 7αC4; the latter being a marker of hepatic BA synthesis. BA diarrhea tends to be associated with higher body mass index, increased stool weight and stool fat, and acceleration of colonic transit. Biochemical markers of increased BA synthesis or excretion are available through reference laboratories. Current treatment of BA diarrhea is based on BA sequestrants, and, in the future, it is anticipated that farsenoid X receptor agonists may also be effective. The optimal conditions for an empiric trial with BA sequestrants as a diagnostic test are still unclear. However, such therapeutic trials are widely used in clinical practice. Some national guidelines recommend definitive diagnosis of BA diarrhea over empirical trial.
Collapse
|
15
|
Camilleri M, Chedid V. Actionable biomarkers: the key to resolving disorders of gastrointestinal function. Gut 2020; 69:1730-1737. [PMID: 32269066 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-320325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2019] [Revised: 02/12/2020] [Accepted: 02/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Camilleri
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Victor Chedid
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
There are ten good reasons why it is important to think about abnormalities in bile acid control in inflammatory bowel disease. Before reviewing these reasons, it is relevant to review essential elements in the enterohepatic circulation, synthesis and actions of bile acids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Camilleri
- Clinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research (CENTER), Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA,Corresponding author: Michael Camilleri, MD, Mayo Clinic, Charlton 8–110, 200 First St. S.W., Rochester, MN 55905, USA. Tel: 507-266-2305;
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Shiha MG, Ashgar Z, Fraser EM, Kurien M, Aziz I. High prevalence of primary bile acid diarrhoea in patients with functional diarrhoea and irritable bowel syndrome-diarrhoea, based on Rome III and Rome IV criteria. EClinicalMedicine 2020; 25:100465. [PMID: 32954237 PMCID: PMC7486326 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Revised: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A high prevalence of primary bile acid diarrhoea (BAD) has been reported for Rome III defined irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)-diarrhoea and functional diarrhoea. We determined whether this still applies under the contemporaneous Rome IV criteria, given that the latter characterises IBS-diarrhoea as having more frequent abdominal pain compared with previous iterations, whilst no longer recognising abdominal discomfort. METHODS Patients referred for a 75SeHCAT test completed a baseline questionnaire comprising, i) demographic data, ii) risk factors for BAD (inflammatory bowel disease, bowel resection, cholecystectomy, microscopic colitis, celiac disease, abdominal-pelvic radiotherapy), iii) the Rome III and IV bowel disorder questionnaire, and iv) mood and somatisation scores. A diagnosis of BAD constituted a 75SeHCAT of ≤15%, with moderate to severe disease being defined as ≤10% and ≤5%, respectively. FINDINGS Of 300 patients with complete dataset, 184 had no risk factors for BAD and fulfilled criteria for either IBS-diarrhoea or functional diarrhoea. The prevalence of primary BAD was 38% (n = 70/184), with almost half having moderate (n = 16) to severe (n = 17) disease. Using the Rome III criteria, the prevalence of primary BAD was 36% in IBS-diarrhoea (n = 63/173) and 64% (n = 7/11) in functional diarrhoea; p = 0.11. Using the Rome IV criteria, the prevalence of primary BAD was 38% (n = 53/139) in IBS-diarrhoea and 38% (n = 17/45) in functional diarrhoea; p = 0.97. Patients with primary BAD experienced more frequent loose stools (p = 0.01) and had a higher body mass index (p<0.0001) compared to those without BAD, but otherwise no significant differences were seen in age, gender, mood, somatisation, or abdominal pain. The presence of primary BAD in patients classified as overweight or obese was approximately 40% and 60%, respectively. INTERPRETATION Over a third of patients with Rome IV IBS-diarrhoea or functional diarrhoea have primary BAD, similar to Rome III. We therefore recommend that, in secondary care settings, generic testing for primary BAD should be considered in patients presenting with chronic diarrhoea of presumed functional origin regardless of concomitant abdominal pain. Centres that lack tests for primary BAD, and who empirically treat instead, may consider targeting patients who are overweight or obese.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed G. Shiha
- Academic Department of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Zohaib Ashgar
- Academic Department of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, United Kingdom
- Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Ellen M. Fraser
- Academic Department of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Kurien
- Academic Department of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, United Kingdom
- Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Imran Aziz
- Academic Department of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, United Kingdom
- Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Vijayvargiya P, Gonzalez Izundegui D, Calderon G, Tawfic S, Batbold S, Camilleri M. Fecal Bile Acid Testing in Assessing Patients With Chronic Unexplained Diarrhea: Implications for Healthcare Utilization. Am J Gastroenterol 2020; 115:1094-1102. [PMID: 32618660 PMCID: PMC7680261 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Bile acid (BA) diarrhea is the cause in ∼26% of chronic unexplained (nonbloody) diarrhea (CUD) based on SeHCAT testing. To assess fecal BA excretion and healthcare utilization in patients with CUD. METHODS In a retrospective review of 1,071 consecutive patients with CUD who completed 48-hour fecal BA testing, we analyzed the symptoms, diagnostic tests performed, and final diagnoses. RESULTS After 135 patients were excluded because of mucosal diseases, increased BA excretion was identified in 476 (51%) of the 936 patients with CUD: 29% with selective increase in primary BA and 22% with increased total BA excretion (35% with normal primary BA excretion). There were no differences in demographics, clinical symptoms, or history of cholecystectomy in patients with elevated total or selective primary fecal BA excretion compared with patients with normal excretion. Before the 48-hour fecal BA excretion test was performed, patients completed on average 1.2 transaxial imaging, 2.6 endoscopic procedures, and 1.6 miscellaneous tests/person. Less than 10% of these tests identified the etiology of CUD. Total fecal BAs >3,033 µmol/48 hour or primary BAs >25% had a 93% negative predictive value to exclude mucosal disease. Among patients with increased fecal BA excretion, >70% reported diarrhea improved with BA sequestrant compared with 26% with normal fecal BA excretion. Patients with selective elevation in primary fecal BAs were 3.1 times (95% confidence interval, 1.5-6.63) more likely to respond to BA sequestrant therapy compared with those with elevated total fecal BAs. DISCUSSION Increased fecal BA excretion is frequent (51%) in patients with CUD. Early 48-hour fecal BA evaluation has the potential to decrease healthcare utilization in CUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priya Vijayvargiya
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Clinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research (CENTER), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Daniel Gonzalez Izundegui
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Clinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research (CENTER), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Gerardo Calderon
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Sarah Tawfic
- Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Sarah Batbold
- Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Michael Camilleri
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Clinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research (CENTER), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Weaver MJ, McHenry SA, Sayuk GS, Gyawali CP, Davidson NO. Bile Acid Diarrhea and NAFLD: Shared Pathways for Distinct Phenotypes. Hepatol Commun 2020; 4:493-503. [PMID: 32258945 PMCID: PMC7109338 DOI: 10.1002/hep4.1485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2019] [Accepted: 01/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) and NAFLD are both common conditions that may be influenced by shared pathways of altered bile acid (BA) signaling and homeostatic regulation. Pathophysiological links between IBS-D and altered BA metabolism include altered signaling through the ileal enterokine and fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19) as well as increased circulating levels of 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one, a metabolic intermediate that denotes increased hepatic BA production from cholesterol. Defective production or release of FGF19 is associated with increased BA production and BA diarrhea in some IBS-D patients. FGF19 functions as a negative regulator of hepatic cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase; therefore, reduced serum FGF19 effectively de-represses hepatic BA production in a subset of IBS-D patients, causing BA diarrhea. In addition, FGF19 modulates hepatic metabolic homeostatic response signaling by means of the fibroblast growth factor receptor 4/klotho beta receptor to activate cascades involved in hepatic lipogenesis, fatty acid oxidation, and insulin sensitivity. Emerging evidence of low circulating FGF19 levels in subsets of patients with pediatric and adult NAFLD demonstrates altered enterohepatic BA homeostasis in NAFLD. Conclusion: Here we outline how understanding of shared pathways of aberrant BA homeostatic signaling may guide targeted therapies in some patients with IBS-D and subsets of patients with NAFLD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J. Weaver
- Division of GastroenterologyWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMO
| | - Scott A. McHenry
- Division of GastroenterologyWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMO
| | - Gregory S. Sayuk
- Division of GastroenterologyWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMO
- U.S. Department of Veterans AffairsVA St. Louis Health Care SystemJohn Cochran DivisionSt. LouisMO
| | - C. Prakash Gyawali
- Division of GastroenterologyWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMO
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Affiliation(s)
- Lawrence R Schiller
- Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Texas A&M University College of Medicine, Dallas Campus, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Walters JRF, Arasaradnam R, Andreyev HJN. Diagnosis and management of bile acid diarrhoea: a survey of UK expert opinion and practice. Frontline Gastroenterol 2019; 11:358-363. [PMID: 32879719 PMCID: PMC7447276 DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2019-101301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2019] [Revised: 08/16/2019] [Accepted: 09/02/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Bile acid diarrhoea (BAD), which includes bile acid malabsorption, causes a variety of digestive symptoms. Diagnostic rates and management vary considerably. We conducted a survey of current practice to review expert opinion and provide guidance on diagnosis and management. DESIGN/METHOD An online survey was conducted of clinical members of the UK Bile Acid Related Diarrhoea Network, who had all published research on BAD (n=21). Most were National Health Service consultants who had diagnosed over 50 patients with the condition. RESULTS The preferred terminology was to use BAD, with primary and secondary to classify causes. A wide range of presenting symptoms and associated conditions were recognised. SeHCAT (tauroselcholic acid) was the preferred diagnostic test, and 50% of respondents thought general practitioners should have access to this. Patients who met the Rome IV diagnostic criteria for functional diarrhoea, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with predominant diarrhoea or postcholecystectomy diarrhoea were usually investigated by SeHCAT, which was used sometimes in other types of IBS. Treatment with a bile acid sequestrant was offered to patients with low SeHCAT values, with expected response rates >70% in the most severe. Colestyramine was the usual sequestrant, starting between 2 g and 8 g daily; colesevelam was an alternative. In patients who had an incomplete response, increasing the dose, changing to an alternative sequestrant, use of loperamide and a low fat diet were suggested. Recommendations for follow-up and to improve the overall patient experience were made. CONCLUSION This expert survey indicates current best practice in the diagnosis and management of BAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian R F Walters
- Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK,Division of Digestive Diseases, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ramesh Arasaradnam
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - H Jervoise N Andreyev
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lincoln County Hospital, Lincoln, UK,School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Baena García A, Partida Palma F, García Martínez S, de Bonilla Candau M, Pajares Vinardell M. 75Se-Homocholic acid taurine scintigraphy (75SeHCAT®), a standard benchmark test in bile acid malabsorption? Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.remnie.2019.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
23
|
Lim SJ, Gracie DJ, Kane JS, Mumtaz S, Scarsbrook AF, Chowdhury FU, Ford AC, Black CJ. Prevalence of, and predictors of, bile acid diarrhea in outpatients with chronic diarrhea: A follow-up study. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2019; 31:e13666. [PMID: 31225936 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.13666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2019] [Revised: 06/04/2019] [Accepted: 06/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND 23-seleno-25-homo-tauro-cholic acid (SeHCAT) scanning to rule out bile acid diarrhea (BAD) in patients with chronic diarrhea has a high yield. Our previous study showed that patients with terminal ileal (TI) Crohn's disease, TI resection, or cholecystectomy were highly likely to have an abnormal scan. As a result, we encouraged clinicians to use a therapeutic trial of a bile acid sequestrant in these patients, instead of scanning. This may have reduced diagnostic yield of the test, so we examined this issue, as well as factors predicting an abnormal scan, in a large cohort of patients referred subsequently. METHODS We retrospectively identified 1,071 consecutive patients with chronic diarrhea undergoing SeHCAT scanning at Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust from 2012 to 2016. We reviewed electronic patient records to obtain information on presenting gastrointestinal symptoms and any proposed risk factors for BAD. BAD was categorized according to subtype and severity. KEY RESULTS As expected, indications for scanning changed between 2012 and 2016, with a significant reduction in referrals with TI Crohn's disease or resection year-on-year (P < 0.001). Despite this, 457 (42.7%) patients had BAD and there was no downward trend in yield of SeHCAT during the 5 year period (P = 0.39). Overall, 51.6% had type II BAD, 36.1% type III, and 12.3% type I. BAD was mild in 31.7%, moderate in 34.4%, and severe in 33.9%. In total, 653 (61.0%) patients had no known risk factors, other than chronic diarrhea, but 233 (35.7%) of these individuals had BAD, and in 143 (61.4%), this was moderate or severe. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES Despite reduced referrals for SeHCAT scanning in those with clear risk factors for BAD, the yield remained > 40%. One-third of those without known risk factors had BAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shujing Jane Lim
- Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - David J Gracie
- Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.,Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - John S Kane
- Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Saqib Mumtaz
- Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Fahmid U Chowdhury
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Alexander C Ford
- Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.,Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Christopher J Black
- Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.,Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Baena García A, Partida Palma F, García Martínez S, de Bonilla Candau M, Pajares Vinardell M. 75Se-Homocholic acid taurine scintigraphy ( 75SeHCAT ®), a standard benchmark test in bile acid malabsorption? Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2019; 38:305-311. [PMID: 30745130 DOI: 10.1016/j.remn.2018.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2018] [Revised: 12/11/2018] [Accepted: 12/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Chronic diarrhoea due to bile acid malabsorption (BAM) is an underdiagnosed pathology. Different diagnostic tools are available. However, there is currently no consensus on which of these would be the benchmark test or gold standard. This review evaluates the possibility of using 75Se-taurocholic acid (75SeHCAT®) scintigraphy as a benchmark diagnostic test and its perspective for the future. A literature review was conducted in Pubmed and OVID obtaining a total of 57 papers, 26 of which were finally used after being selected under the concepts of gold standard, diagnostic accuracy and other biomarkers. We evaluated the advantages and disadvantages of the different diagnostic tools: 14C-glycocholate, measurement of bile acids in faeces, C4 in serum, FGF19 in serum, cholestyramine, and 75Se-tauroselcolic acid scintigraphy. We consider that the 75SeHCAT® scan is the most recommended diagnostic test in Europe for diagnosing BAM as it presents the highest values of sensitivity and specificity. It has a significant cost-benefit ratio, making it the test with the highest degree of recommendation. However, it is still not possible to use it in a recognised way as a gold standard due to the lack of studies that provide conclusive data that allow consensus. In the meantime, the combined use of cholestyramine testing in all patients we want to evaluate, regardless of the scintigraphy result, could be encouraged as a benchmark standard.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Baena García
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, España.
| | - F Partida Palma
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, España
| | - S García Martínez
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, España
| | - M de Bonilla Candau
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, España
| | - M Pajares Vinardell
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, España
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Fernandes DCR, Poon D, White LL, Andreyev HJN. What is the cost of delayed diagnosis of bile acid malabsorption and bile acid diarrhoea? Frontline Gastroenterol 2019; 10:72-76. [PMID: 30651961 PMCID: PMC6319159 DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2018-101011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2018] [Revised: 06/20/2018] [Accepted: 07/09/2018] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION 75Selenium taurocholic acid (SeHCAT) scanning diagnoses bile acid malabsorption/bile acid diarrhoea (BAM/BAD) and defines optimal treatment. Approximately 2% of the population have BAM/BAD. AIM To evaluate the cost of delayed diagnosis of BAM/BAD. METHODS Patients' notes who underwent SeHCAT scanning in three hospitals over a 1-year period were reviewed retrospectively. Scan results and treatment response were recorded. Package-of-care costs were calculated using costing tools from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence and from United Lincolnshire Hospitals Trust business unit. RESULTS Between June 2016 and May 2017, 19 men and 37 women (median age 58 (range 19-83)) of 3860 new patients seen in gastroenterology clinics were referred for SeHCAT scanning. Sixty-four per cent of scans were abnormal: 13 demonstrated severe (<5% 7-day SeHCAT retention), 13 moderate (5%-10%), 5 mild (10%-15%) and 5 borderline (15%-20%) BAD/BAM. Likely causes included primary BAD (n=16), cholecystectomy (n=13), inflammatory bowel disease (n=4) and other (n=3). If SeHCAT scanning was ordered at first consultation (n=11), patients reported 24 months (median) of symptoms (range 6-360) and the median diagnostic package-of-care cost was £811.40 (95% CI £625.59 to £1508.20). If SeHCAT scanning was booked later (n=25), patients reported symptoms for 30 months (median, range 0.5-360) and the cost was £1568.31 (95% CI £1200.55 to £1713.18). Following diagnosis, treatment led to symptom improvement (n=24), no change/deterioration (n=3) and not reported (n=9). CONCLUSIONS SeHCAT is underused. Late diagnosis leads to unnecessary demands for other services and treatment delay. Early diagnosis achieves health benefits while reducing costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dennis Poon
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lincoln County Hospital, Lincoln, UK
| | - Laura L White
- Department of Medical Diagnostics, Lincoln County Hospital, Lincoln, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Arasaradnam RP, Brown S, Forbes A, Fox MR, Hungin P, Kelman L, Major G, O'Connor M, Sanders DS, Sinha R, Smith SC, Thomas P, Walters JRF. Guidelines for the investigation of chronic diarrhoea in adults: British Society of Gastroenterology, 3rd edition. Gut 2018; 67:1380-1399. [PMID: 29653941 PMCID: PMC6204957 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 164] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2017] [Revised: 02/28/2018] [Accepted: 03/11/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Chronic diarrhoea is a common problem, hence clear guidance on investigations is required. This is an updated guideline from 2003 for the investigations of chronic diarrhoea commissioned by the Clinical Services and Standards Committee of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG). This document has undergone significant revision in content through input by 13 members of the Guideline Development Group (GDG) representing various institutions. The GRADE system was used to appraise the quality of evidence and grading of recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramesh P Arasaradnam
- University Hospital Coventry, Coventry, UK
- Department of Applied Biological Sciences, University of Coventry, Coventry, UK
- Clinical Sciences Research Institute, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK
| | | | - Alastair Forbes
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Mark R Fox
- University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
- Abdominal Centre, St Claraspital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Pali Hungin
- School of Medicine, Pharmacy & Health, University of Durham, Durham, UK
| | | | - Giles Major
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | | | - Rakesh Sinha
- Department of Radiology, South Warwickshire Hospitals, Warwick, UK
| | - Stephen Charles Smith
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Midlands and NW Bowel Cancer Screening Hub, Rugby, UK
| | - Paul Thomas
- Department of Gastroenterology, Musgrave Park Hospital, Taunton, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|