Recent advances in neonatology

Impact of comprehensive quality improvement program on outcomes in very-low-birth-weight infants: A cluster-randomized controlled trial in Japan

BACKGROUND

Differences in outcomes among neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in Japan have been noted, prompting the need for quality improvement.

AIM

To assess a comprehensive quality improvement program on outcomes in very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants.

STUDY DESIGN

A cluster-randomized clinical trial.

SUBJECTS

Forty hospitals and VLBW infants born in 2012-2014 and admitted to those hospitals were study subjects.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The intervention group (IG) received a comprehensive quality improvement program involving clinical practice guidelines, educational outreach visits, workshops, opinion leader training, audits, and feedback. The control group (CG) was provided only with the guidelines. The primary outcome was survival without neurological impairment at three years of age.

RESULTS

IG consisted of 19 hospitals and 1735 infants, while CG included 21 hospitals and 1700 infants. There were no significant differences in gestational weeks, 29.1(26.9-31.3) vs. 29.1(26.7-31.1) or birth weights (g), 1054(789-1298) vs. 1084(810-1309) between the two groups. Both groups showed survival rates without neurological impairment of 67.2 % (1166) and 66.9 % (1137), respectively, without a significant difference. There was no significant difference in mortalities at NICU discharge between the groups, with rates of 4.0 % (70) and 4.2 % (72) respectively. Several clinically relevant improvements were observed in IG, including reduced rates of sepsis, adrenal insufficiency, transfusion for anemia, and a shorter interval to achieve full enteral feeding. However, these did not lead to improvements in the primary outcome.

CONCLUSION

The comprehensive quality improvement program to Japanese NICUs did not result in a significant improvement in survival without neurological impairment in VLBW infants.

Prevalence, Cost, and Variation in Cost of Pediatric Hospitalizations in Ontario, Canada

IMPORTANCE

Identifying conditions that could be prioritized for research based on health care system burden is important for developing a research agenda for the care of hospitalized children. However, existing prioritization studies are decades old or do not include data from both pediatric and general hospitals.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prevalence, cost, and variation in cost of pediatric hospitalizations at all general and pediatric hospitals in Ontario, Canada, with the aim of identifying conditions that could be prioritized for future research.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This population-based cross-sectional study used health administrative data from 165 general and pediatric hospitals in Ontario, Canada. Children younger than 18 years with an inpatient hospital encounter between April 1, 2014, and March 31, 2019, were included.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Condition-specific prevalence, cost of pediatric hospitalizations, and condition-specific variation in cost per inpatient encounter across hospitals. Variation in cost was evaluated using (1) intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and (2) number of outlier hospitals. Costs were adjusted for inflation to 2018 US dollars.

RESULTS

Overall, 627 314 inpatient hospital encounters (44.8% among children younger than 30 days and 53.0% among boys) at 165 hospitals (157 general and 8 pediatric) costing $3.3 billion were identified. A total of 408 003 hospitalizations (65.0%) and $1.4 billion (43.8%) in total costs occurred at general hospitals. Among the 50 most prevalent and 50 most costly conditions (of 68 total conditions), the top 10 highest-cost conditions accounted for 55.5% of all costs and 48.6% of all encounters. The conditions with highest prevalence and cost included low birth weight (86.2 per 1000 encounters; $676.3 million), preterm newborn (38.0 per 1000 encounters; $137.4 million), major depressive disorder (20.7 per 1000 encounters; $78.3 million), pneumonia (27.3 per 1000 encounters; $71.6 million), other perinatal conditions (68.0 per 1000 encounters; $65.8 million), bronchiolitis (25.4 per 1000 encounters; $54.6 million), and neonatal hyperbilirubinemia (47.9 per 1000 encounters; $46.7 million). The highest variation in cost per encounter among the most costly medical conditions was observed for 2 mental health conditions (other mental health disorders [ICC, 0.28] and anxiety disorders [ICC, 0.19]) and 3 newborn conditions (intrauterine hypoxia and birth asphyxia [ICC, 0.27], other perinatal conditions [ICC, 0.17], and surfactant deficiency disorder [ICC, 0.17]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This population-based cross-sectional study of hospitalized children identified several newborn and mental health conditions as having the highest prevalence, cost, and variation in cost across hospitals. Findings of this study can be used to develop a research agenda for the care of hospitalized children that includes general hospitals and to ultimately build a more substantial evidence base and improve patient outcomes.

Functional outcomes in self-care, mobility, communication, and learning in extremely low-birth weight infants

Gaps have existed in specifying degrees of severity of cerebral palsy assessment of self-care and communicative competencies, and specifying age-appropriate preschool educational and behavioral competencies. Imbedded in the concept of measuring functional status is the interaction between health and neurologic impairments, developmental challenges and competencies, family resources and disadvantages, and the child's current status. In reviewing historic outcomes of severe ROP over the past 40 years, it was noted that severe ROP caused blindness in 2% to 11% of survivors. There was a constant observation that approximately 50% of severe ROP survivors with blindness had multiple functional and developmental challenges beyond blindness alone. Similarly, in reviewing outcomes of cerebral palsy, it is imperative to describe the severity of cerebral palsy and functional consequences in motor, selfcare, communication, and learning. The reason to measure the functional status of children with neurodevelopmental impairments before first grade is that the degrees of severity of these disorders can be specified before attending school with peers. Subtler aspects of neurodevelopmental impairments need to assess impact on literacy, information learning, written language, social competencies with peers, and recreational and community participation. In this way, we can understand the vulnerabilities and resiliences of children and families of VLBW and ELBW status. This is a critical step in understanding long-term quality of life and independent living issues. In addition, our efforts can address those factors and pathways whereby multiple disabilities and multiple functional limitations cluster. Our biomedical intervention can prioritize strategies that lessen severe multiple disabilities and simultaneously support families, when despite our best efforts functional challenges are life long.